#31 gravity as Displacement Magnetism in Faraday Law provides a explanation of the concept of "center of gravity" ;monograph-book: UNIFICATION OF THE FORCES OF PHYSICS AS A COULOMB UNIFICATION
plutonium....@gmail.com
> plutonium.archime...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > (snipped)
> > >
> > > Already I am thinking of how to set up an experiment to verify that in
> > > Faraday's Induction, we alter the
> > > Space around the experiment that includes the positron "backdrop
> > > space". So as the induction yields
> > > a current in the closed loop, the induction also changes the Space
> > > surrounding the experiment.
> > >
> > > It is going to be tough to measure that "displacement magnetism"
> > > because it is on the order of 10^-40
> > > weaker than the current produced in Faraday Induction. But I am
> > > optimistic that such experiments
> > > are easy to set up because of the past history of very delicate
> > > experimental measures.
> > >
> > > So, has any physicist in the past history ever looked for a slight
> > > change in the Faraday's Induction
> > > experiment, a change of gravity? I like to call it Displacement
> > > Magnetism.
> > >
> > > So the new added term to Faraday's Law will be a Displacement
> > > Magnetism and make the Faraday
> > > and Ampere laws symmetrical.
> > >
> >
> > Maybe I am in a bit of luck here. I do remember that several of the
> > planets such as
> > Mercury, or Venus or Mars or the satellites of various planets have a
> > tiny and weak
> > magnetic field yet they have no dynamo mechanism inside those bodies
> > to produce
> > a magnetic field. But as these planets or satellites have small
> > electrical storms or
> > currents and as their motion through space, would set up a
> > "Displacement Magnetism".
> >
> > So, perhaps the magnetism of Mercury is just what the doctor ordered.
> > And if true, then
> > all astro bodies have a small and tiny magnetism since they all have
> > electric currents.
> >
> > So, has anyone measured what the electric currents on Mercury would
> > be? And if so, we
> > plug that data into a Faraday's Law encompassing the entire planet
> > Mercury and compute
> > what its Displacement Magnetism should be. If it matches the current
> > data, we have
> > found proof of Displacement Magnetism.
> >
> > Some other bodies such as Europa and Io maybe even better measuring
> > sites.
> >
>
> Here is a case where scientists have not provided adequate data. A
> website that lists
> all the current planet and satellite magnetic fields. A table that
> lists all the magnetic fields.
>
> Here is a website that speaks of the Moon's magnetic field
> http://www-ssc.igpp.ucla.edu/personnel/russell/papers/measure(9)/
> -4.23 x 10^22 Gauss-cm^3
>
> I found alot of websites talking about Mercury's magnetic field but
> none that state
> what it actually is.
>
> Apparently the magnetic field of Mercury is anomalous for Mercury
> rotates about 60 times
> slower than Earth.
>
> Here is a website that talks of the anomaly of gas giant planet's
> magnetic field.
> --- quoting from http://www.phy6.org/earthmag/planetmg.htm ---
> The magnetic axes of Uranus and Neptune, on the other hand, are
> inclined by about 60� to their rotation axes. The shape and properties
> of a planetary magnetosphere depends on the angle between the flow of
> the solar wind (i.e. the direction from the Sun) and the magnetic
> axis, and for those two planets, that angle is rapidly changing all
> the time. As a result, their magnetospheres undergo wild variations
> during each rotation, although both manage to contain trapped
> particles. The origin of all those field is unknown: Saturn is big
> enough to produce metallic hydrogen in its core, but Uranus and
> Neptune are not.
> --- end quoting ---
>
> So here maybe this added term to the Faraday Law can clear up and
> clear out all these anomalies.
>
> Consider that the Moon is like a loop in Faraday Induction where the
> magnet is planet Earth. So that
> Earth creates not only a current but also a magnetic field center at
> the Moon's center.
>
> As for the gas giants, the solar wind or the magnetosphere of Jupiter
> can be the magnet of Faraday's
> Law causing a Displacement Magnetism in the center of gas giants.
>
> As for Mercury, that really is anomalous for the Dynamo theory people.
> However, if you consider Mercury's
> magnetic field as due to the extra term in Faraday's Law of a
> Displacement Magnetism caused by the
> Sun as the magnet of Faraday's Law, then the explanation of how astro
> bodies with no apparent
> dynamo is given.
>
> Even Mars has a larger magnetic field than it is supposed to have. But
> if you take the solar winds as
> the magnet, or even the nearby Jupiter's magnetosphere as the magnet
> of Faraday's Law would induce
> not only a current in Faraday's Law but a Displacement Magnetism
> centered in the center of Mars.
>
> So this added term to Faraday's Law now gives astronomers two means of
> accounting for astro body
> magnetic moment. Either created by Dynamo means or created as a result
> of the added term in
> Faraday's Law-- Displacement Magnetism.
>
> The Moon's puzzling magnetism is thus easily explained. Not because of
> an iron or ironsulfide
> core for the Moon, but simply because of the Moon's acting as the loop
> in Faraday Law and Earth
> acting as the moving bar magnet in Faraday's Law setting up a current
> but also a permanent magnetic
> moment at the center of the Moon.
>
> Now, does this number : -4.23 x 10^22 Gauss-cm^3 look about correct
> for a Displacement-Magnetism
> for the Moon with Earth as the bar-magnet in Faraday's Law. It looks
> about right to me.
>
> I wonder if I can do a Ampere-Maxwell Law on Jupiter and its moon of
> Io and see if the magnetic moment
> of Io would agree with the Displacement Current, not Displacement
> Magnetism, but Displacement
> Current of Ampere-Maxwell Law.
>
> In other words, a checking of the added terms for Faraday Law and
> Ampere Law.
Newsgroups: sci.physics, sci.math, sci.astro
From: a_plutonium <a_pluton...@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:59:40 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Jan 17 2008 9:59 pm
Subject: #17 recent news of antimatter in Milky Way galactic center;
monograph-book: UNIFICATION OF THE FORCES OF PHYSICS AS A COULOMB
UNIFICATION
Last time I wrote on the Unification book was back in January. But
with my recent writings
of the past few days, it looks as though that number has risen from
#17 to that of #31.
I should start another new book titled : Revised Maxwell Equations. In
the future they will be
known as the AP-Maxwell Equations due to the amount of changing I
make.
Never before in the history of physics were we able to explain the
concept of center of gravity. Why
does gravity act such that it is all pulled into a center-point? Up
until now there never was a
satisfactory explanation. With Dirac's Ocean of Positrons as Space
itself, provides us with the
most clearest of explanations as to why gravity is all at the center
of Earth. Because the magnetic
pull of the Positrons Antimatter is all focused on the center of
Earth.
The Maxwell Equations:
curl E = -dB
curl B = dE + J
div E = k
div B = 0
These are the AP-Maxwell Equations:
curl E = -dB - M
curl B = dE + J
div E = k
div B = k'
Maxwell's displacement current J. As for M; it is a Displacement-
Magnetism in Faraday's Law
and it makes the Ampere and Faraday Laws symmetrical.
Note: at this moment I am not sure of the sign of M, whether it is
negative or positive. I suspect it
is negative just as -dB is negative. But the sign for a Displacement
Magnetism is merely an indication
of direction of the magnetic field.
Note: the new term k' in Gauss's law of magnetism is dependent on the
idea that the Universe contains
at least one magnetic monopole, so it can no longer be zero valued.
But the monopole is dependent
on the quantization of electric charge. So there is a dependency of
Coulomb's law with monopole existence.
Because the Universe is an Atom Totality, there exists one monopole--
the Universe itself and so
Gauss's law of magnetism is no longer a 0 value but has a value
symmetrical with the Coulomb law.
I definetly have to write a new separate book on the Revised Maxwell
Equations. I have reached an
annoying part in my researches of science where everything is blended
and has implications for my
other theories. Annoying because it is hard to keep them separated.
The most beautiful aspect of Displacement Magnetism is that we no
longer view gravity as we did
before. We no longer see gravity as a bending of space and mass
following the curvature of that
bent space. We see gravity now as the idea that given a massive object
such as the Earth and
a apple on a tree. That Earth is representated by a Positron
(background) Space. So the Space
that Earth occupies is also occupied by Positron Antimatter. We can
say that Space is this
positron-antimatter. And thus, when the apple falls from the tree, the
reason it takes flight towards
the center of Earth is because all the Positron-antimatter has a
magnetic pull of that apple and those
positrons are focused on the center of Earth.
Newton and all the followers of Newton, even General Relativity could
never explain satisfactorily why
gravity force originates from the center of Earth. Because gravity is
the magnetic pull of positrons
to matter is the explanation why gravity is focused from the center of
Earth.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
Uncle Al
>
> plutonium.archime...@gmail.com wrote:
> > plutonium.archime...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Archimedes Plutonium
[snip more crap]
> whole entire Universe is just one big atom
> where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
I cannot believe how incredibly stupid Archie-Poo is. I mean
rock-hard stupid. Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid. Surface
of Venus under 80 atmospheres of red hot carbon dioxide and sulfuric
acid vapor dehydrated for 300 million years rock-hard stupid. Stupid
so stupid that it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole
different sensorium of stupid. Archie-Poo is trans-stupid stupid.
Meta-stupid. Stupid so collapsed upon itself that it is within its
own Schwarzschild radius. Black hole stupid. Stupid gotten so dense
and massive that no intellect can escape. Singularity stupid.
Archie-Poo emits more stupid/second than our entire galaxy otherwise
emits stupid/year. Quasar stupid. Nothing else in the universe can
be this stupid. Archie-Poo is an oozingly putrescent primordial
fragment from the original Big Bang of Stupid, a pure essence of
stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond the laws of
physics that define maximally extrapolated hypergeometric
n-dimensional backgroundless stupid as we can imagine it. Archie-Poo
is Planck stupid, a quantum foam of stupid, a vacuum decay of stupid,
a grand unified theory of stupid.
Archie-Poo is the epiphany of stupid. Archie-poo is stooopid.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
hostlocal
"Uncle Al" <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:48AA015F...@hate.spam.net...
Thanks UA, for your excellent use of the language. OBW, AP has a site on
MySpace, says he's a girlie now.