Plutonium-antiCavendish Experiment that proves EM-gravity #154 New Physics #263 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Alright, I modified and repeated the Cavendish Experiment.

wire cable
|
|
|----| |__|
1 2

What is shown are two 50 lb steel weights, numbered 1 and 2, one (2)
stationary on the floor and the other (1) is suspended in air by a
wire cable.

The distance of the gap between them is 5 mm. The 5mm is achieved by
keeping 1 stationary in air and then moving 2 over until the gap is
5mm.

Then it is looked to see if a attraction occurs for the masses. But
there is
some motion due to the ambient environment. Difficult to say whether
it is from Plate Tectonics of the ground, or air currents of even the
EM attraction of the masses. Anyway there is vibrations such that the
suspended weight never seems to stop and be fully stationary.

For the life of me, I do not know how Cavendish in 1797 ever had his
torsion bar in the air become stationary.

Anyway, I waited 1/2 hour to see if the mass 1 closed the gap with
mass 2. It never occurred but the swinging never stopped and the
swinging never touched mass 2.

Now I fetched two strong magnets and placed one near the center side
of
1 to see if the gap would close. I let it swing for 1/2 hour and came
back to find that the swinging did not stop but that the gap was
smaller but still open.

Finally I put the second magnet on mass 2 and waited but the gap would
not close.

I need to refine this experiment, by knowing what strength of magnets
I have. At some particular strength the gap should be closed.

Now assessing that experience with the actual Cavendish Experiment
where there are two suspensions, one of the two smaller lead balls and
one for the
two large lead balls. Now if I could not get the vibrations out of my
suspended 50 lb weight, I see no hope in Cavendish removing the
vibrations from his experiment and what he thought were gravity
attraction by about 1/4 turn, is likely to be just the imperfections
of the entire set-up where the beams are never balanced, where the
weights are never equal and where the
torsion bars are always vibrating. So that the alleged 1/4 turn is all
due to the fact of imbalance and vibrations.

The important thing is that Cavendish Experiment needs to be immersed
in EM, and numbers from EM to see if there is a force of Newtonian
attraction.
More than likely there never was a mass gravity attracting other mass,
but rather, there was the EM of a body attracting the EM of a
neighboring body.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

[Archimedes Plutonium]

On Jan 31, 9:13 pm, Archimedes Plutonium

Sorry, I have something very odd to report, something that defies my
sensibility
about the above experiment. In that I cannot seem to ever get the
suspended 50 lb
steel weight next to the stationary steel weight separated by 5mm to
ever be stationary
itself. I went back to the experiment and tried to hold it stationary
but the moment I let go
it resumed to vibrate. I placed a card at one end and another card at
the other to hold stationary but it resumed to vibrate.

So I wonder if anyone who has completed the Cavendish Experiment,
whether they could
ever get the weights or the torsion bar or the torque measure to stop
vibrating?

So I am skeptical that the Cavendish Experiment is ever measure of
gravity with a constant vibration throughout the system.

I looked to see if any famous repeats of the experiment in recent
times has taken place, and it looks as though no-one is addressing the
constant vibration problem, however I do see where the laser
attachment is used. So perhaps the laser attachment is causing the
modern experiment to overlook the fact of a constant vibration.

In one report, I remember the author talking about Cavendish's own
experiment complaining that he had to install special reeds for the
reading of torque, and how the torque continued to oscillate.

Has this experiment become a legend and no longer science and accurate
science? We tend to overlook experiments that have become famous, as
to their shoddiness of logic and reason and perhaps the Cavendish is
an example.

In EM-gravity, the claim of the Cavendish Experiment is put to the
test as never before. In EM-gravity, if there is any attraction, it is
not due to mass of the objects, but due rather instead to the fact
that both objects or all four objects have electric charge and
magnetism inside them.

So the constant vibration, maybe due to the repulsion of uneven
charge, because we all remember that as you have north pole to north
pole of magnets they repulse and not attract.

So that the constant oscillation that Cavendish noticed was those
uneven charge distributions, one moment you have attraction, the next
you have repulsion.

Anyway, we need to reopen the case of the Cavendish Experiment, for it
is probably the first time that the experiment was given a true run of
what is going on, not what everyone expects and wants to see, but
rather, the true inner workings.

I am going to see if I can stop the vibrations of the suspended weight
by removal of the other weight.