New ideas for time, space, and matter in discrete models

[Mike Helland]

Hello,

I've been working on some ideas that deal with a discrete nature but
the role of time is very different in this model.

Instead of time acting as a medium or dimension of some kind, time
exists in the context of multiple states.

For example, you have state A. You also have state B. When viewed on
their own state A and state B are timeless, but when analyzed
together, a discrete change of state is viewed as an instant. A
before, an after, and nothing in between.

Similar reasoning is applied to matter and space.

This ideas are *very* difficult to understand unless you are ready to
unlearn everything you know about time and space. But I think the
rewards are clear:

A discrete view of nature that easily explains the most difficult
concepts of physics, such as time dilation and the wave-particle
duality.

Please let me know what you think:
http://www.techmocracy.net/science/nature.htm

Mike Helland

[valentin tihomirov]

I have read through the paper with great interest. Existance of the
fundamental unobservable Universe emulating interactions in our world is
well grounded. However, you tell "It is important to note that because
fundamental nature lies beyond our own nature we shall try to say as little
as possible about fundamental nature". From one point of view, your manifest
against any speculations shoud be welcomed. There are other purely
theoretical hypotesis which can be unified by a single attribute - they all
insight the (infinite?) loop of supernatures: the digital physics tells that
the Universe is modeled on a supercomputer; another TOE tells that
everything was created by god who lives inside everything. The discouraging
point in all these conjenctures is: aren't they simply describe everything
and nothing at the same time because the cardinal question "who created the
god itself" is not addressed? Some argue that life could not concieve itself
on the Earth so quickly; obsiously, we are the aliens came from another
planet -- this does not answer the question about origin of life. My
interest remains unsatisfied. If the study is purely theoretical, can it
suggest the ultimate view of the nature?