Accelerator- Analogy Invention- for sale

[Douglas Eagleson]

I was always interested in accelerators and so I made a small one once
to play with. I used a computer screen and magnets to alter the
display. Normally a useless pastime because a scanning coil made for
higly complex outcome inference.

A south pole placed in the correct location was a scan effect.
Meaning it would alter the displayed image. Alter as a place
distortion the letters on the screen for instance. All that was
required would be a strong magnet. So a little tv screen in a tv
screen scanning coil was invented.

A small coil set to stick to the screen. So everytime the electron
beam hit the center a new image could be formed.

Having only a small magnetic field I found it only hardly working. A
large distance was required to alter effectivly the electron beam.

So my invention sort of failed. A little tv in a tv would have to
wait for a strong coil system. I am a adept analogy user and searched
for usages as a theoretical image intensifier. A beam strength as a
final electron energy was a certain coil parameter. So the scanned
screen would develop a bright spot.

Analogy means to generalize a topic in the abstract.

So a scan? So I thunk a while.

And here is the invention. An LED light can irradiate. And the idea
was to find a simple device in analogy. So LED light casuing the LED
light appeared the invention. A small sensor to power the LED could
be LED powered.

So a beam in a beam would happen. An enclosed beam.

A simple question might be where appeared the useful beam,beam?

So here was the outcome. IN analogy to beam beams we can develop a
model. A useful technology was the missle interceptor.

Now hitting the high flying missle is a General Relativistic
nighmire. Exact calculation of interceptor orbital changes is hard
work.

So a special analogy gravity, gravity sensor would assist the
interception calculation. A special clock-gravity calculator sensor
would allow easy,easy,easy GR correct orbital inference.

A weight scale to drive a clock. A boost acceleration would have to be
then the cause as time measure!! I slightly subjectively effect,
normally not allowed, but for calculational reasons functional. A
force as an accelerating interceptor can also sense the earth's field.
A force was always the combined effect of thrust and earth place
location.

So A clock powered by force was to be the analogy invention. As a
rate increased a clock would do acceleration effect inferrence
automatically. A signal from the clock could be cause to thrust
change and angle change.

So to correctly apply the beam beam we seek a solution to the 4-D GR
two body problem. SO thunka gain.

And here appears the react as clock force effect. A triple beam was
to be the computer screen in analogy. A target on a screen, a
distance(from ground radar), and the sensor(gravity-clock), a triple
beamie.

Now all the hard part is done. A clock invention does function to
exactly target. NO ground computers are required except for the target
distance measure.

Here is the function:

time = distance.

A clock was to place the force as required for interception. Now an
assumption was to use a powered rocket only so boosted
interceptionalways occurs. Simplifying the functional method.

A straight hit. SO all the low altitude calculations would happen on
another computer.
Once the low altitude lock on happens a stright attack force was to be
calculatable.

Decrease force, means slow down. Increase force means speed up.

So the rocket has a nose motor to slow it down if necessary! A clock
then directs. Two intersecting orbits appears the task. A homing
sensor only sets the inferred clock. A continual update of force of
thtust.

distance= time rate

clock initial setting = accelerator.

A ground station must maintain absolute time measure. All next thrust
inference was distance. Projected distance to interception is a mear
orbit intersection. So place intime orbit attacks the incoming missle.

All you have to do was to buy the technology. These special sensors
as clock rate with updated initial settings are real new costly
devices.

If you understand the benifit what is a good sensor worth?

A single inference hides the tehcnology so a good GR specialist is
allowed to understand. Direction of GR orbit altitude was always a
simple function as a one tensor. Never never do anything but solve for
the exact tensor.

I figure it is worth $100K and apiece of the missle percentage.

And so it was sold to the opposition.