Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

FORCE -- What It REALLY IS !

0 views
Skip to first unread message

mcel...@visto.com

unread,
Sep 23, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/23/99
to


Physical FORCE -- What It REALLY IS !

Most orthodox physicists do NOT know what a force REALLY
IS. The best that they can do is to define it in terms of
what it DOES--accelerate a mass, (F = ma). Yet, they
ARROGANTLY use the terms "PSEUDO-FORCE" and "FICTIONAL FORCE"
to describe forces like CENTRIFUGAL FORCE and the CORIOLIS
FORCE. The physicists have FAILED to pick up the CLUE, about
what a force really IS, from the fact that these so-called
"pseudo-forces" result from MOTIONS.

According to the GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the physical
Universe developed by the late Physicist Dewey B. Larson,
each force is a MOTION, or a COMBINATION OF MOTIONS, or a
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MOTIONS, including INWARD and OUTWARD
SCALAR MOTIONS, in the form of TRANSLATIONAL, VIBRATIONAL,
ROTATIONAL, or ROTATIONAL-VIBRATIONAL motions.

For example, the expansion of the physical Universe is
simply an OUTWARD SCALAR MOTION, which is an INHERENT
PROPERTY of the Universe and NOT a result of a "big bang",
[which means that "Hubble's constant", whatever its correct
value, can NOT be used to determine the age of the physical
Universe.].

Gravitation is an INWARD SCALAR MOTION that obeys the
inverse square law. MOTION is what makes a homogeneous
gravitational field "EQUIVALENT" to a uniformly accelerated
reference frame, (which is in a certain kind of MOTION).

For objects moving at speeds close to the speed of
light, acceleration drops toward zero, (a = F/m), NOT because
"mass increases toward infinity" (mass really STAYS
CONSTANT), but because FORCE decreases toward ZERO (because
of the RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MOTIONS of the near-light speed
of the object and the OUTWARD SCALAR MOTION of light at the
speed of light).

In Larson's Theory, the "strong nuclear force" and the
"weak nuclear force" DO NOT EXIST. They are merely AD HOC
ASSUMPTIONS, resulting from an ERRONEOUS model of the atom.

A WEALTH of information about Physicist Dewey B.
Larson's GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the physical Universe,
("The Reciprocal System of Theory"), can now be found at the
web site http://www.randomc.com/~rs .

Robert E. McElwaine
B.S., Physics and Astronomy, UW-EC
http://www.angelfire.com/wi/mcelwaine

P.S.: PASS IT ON !


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

Edward Moyse

unread,
Sep 24, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/24/99
to
Omigod - he's on this newsgroup too!


<mcel...@visto.com> wrote in message news:7se516$q6k$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...


>
>
>
> Physical FORCE -- What It REALLY IS !
>
> Most orthodox physicists do NOT know what a force REALLY

(Snip - and probably fluah but I haven't really read it)

tjrathbun

unread,
Oct 3, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/3/99
to

mcel...@visto.com wrote in message <7se516$q6k$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>...

>
>
>
> Physical FORCE -- What It REALLY IS !
>
> Most orthodox physicists do NOT know what a force REALLY
> B.S., Physics and Astronomy, UW-EC
> http://www.angelfire.com/wi/mcelwaine
>
> P.S.: PASS IT ON !
>
>
>
>
>Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

You are correct. The following are values that may be of interest to you:

m=E/c2
E=mc2, which is complete as E=c2/hm or E=mc2/h. All forms of energy have an
ultimate value and then the value (relating to our existence) ceases.
c2=E/m, is the equation for earth's gravitational constant. This equation
relating to Newton's equation for gravitational attraction causes it to
become the following:

At present F = Gm1m2/d2 but it changes to F = G(m1Q2) x (m1Q2) / d2

Which means as the "Q" factor changes (heat energy) so does the
gravitational field. Were the "Q" factor to be zero, so would the
gravitational field.

D. Ertle South Haven, Mi.

duane...@hotmail.com

0 new messages