flat sun theory - NOTSPAM
Baphomet
formation of rotating bodies as opposed to the close to linear rotation
we experience that relates more to the field of a disk (not cylinder)
--
Joann http://carpet.blog.com/
shy http://sheilafeistyshy.blogspot.com/
me - http://barphomet.blog.com/
1% - I give to law what law gives to me
N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)
"Baphomet" <dale....@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:ZKadnfbunfwWPzna...@comcast.com...
> if the sun was a sphere(ball) wouldn't you expect
> more of a shell formation of rotating bodies as
> opposed to the close to linear rotation we
> experience that relates more to the field of a disk
> (not cylinder)
Not unless you forget that orbits that are sometimes "above" some
common plane tend to intersect matter along the plane when they
try and swing "below", crash, alter momentum, and stay mostly in
plane. Orbits are not of bits of matter stuck inside some
rotating rigid shell(s).
David A. Smith
Jeckyl
> formation of rotating bodies as opposed to the close to linear rotation
> we experience that relates more to the field of a disk (not cylinder)
No .. its not spam .. its just utter nonsense.
Baphomet
> No .. its not spam .. its just utter nonsense.
serious, a sphere would have a shell force/flux and a shell formation of
planets not just a linear one
N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)
"Baphomet" <dale....@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:I_-dnc5htpirhjja...@comcast.com...
> serious, a sphere would have a shell force/flux
> and a shell formation of planets not just a linear
> one
It isn't linear. It closely approximates planar. It does so,
because the planets were formed from a diffuse cloud, which
disspated differential momentum above and below the "ecliptic".
Additonally, tidal forces tend to keep things dancing to the
Sun's tune. Tidal forces do not force things "out of plane".
David A. Smith
Jeckyl
> On Sun, 03 Feb 2008 09:47:01 +1100, Jeckyl wrote:
>
>> No .. its not spam .. its just utter nonsense.
>
> serious,
No .. you're not
> a sphere would have a shell force/flux and a shell formation of
> planets not just a linear one
Not if it is spinning.
slde...@aol.com
wrote:
> Dear Baphomet:
>
> "Baphomet" <dale.ke...@comcast.net> wrote in message
Baph Sphere looks like a circle at any angel Bert
Baphomet
> It isn't linear. It closely approximates planar. It does so, because
> the planets were formed from a diffuse cloud, which disspated
> differential momentum above and below the "ecliptic".
>
> Additonally, tidal forces tend to keep things dancing to the Sun's tune.
> Tidal forces do not force things "out of plane".
a stretch
N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)
"Baphomet" <dale....@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:OPudnQyO2vBrUTja...@comcast.com...
> On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 18:57:40 -0700, N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
> wrote:
>
>> It isn't linear. It closely approximates planar. It does
>> so, because the planets were formed from a diffuse
>> cloud, which disspated differential momentum above
>> and below the "ecliptic".
>>
>> Additonally, tidal forces tend to keep things dancing
>> to the Sun's tune. Tidal forces do not force things
>> "out of plane".
>
> a stretch
Tell your mommy that someone on the internet said it was OK to
sprinkle a half a cup of flour on a sheet of newspaper. Draw the
newspaper under a ruler, so that the flour is scraped up by the
ruler. Notice how the flour (a 2D sheet) piles up? From 2D to
3D.
The Sun is a ball, because it is the lowest energy state. If it
were a disc, it could collapse into a ball, and become smaller.
David A. Smith