Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Libertarians hold the door open for terrorists...

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Scott Douglas

unread,
Jun 24, 2002, 9:28:12 PM6/24/02
to
> "Scott Douglas" <s_do...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> Mr Price argues that completely open borders and unrestricted
>> immigration to the U.S. - The perpetual demand of the Libertarian
>> party. would be more effective at stopping terrorists from entering
>> the U.S. than existing policy that has had successes.

"Michael Price" <nini...@yahoo.com> wrote
> No I didn't but let's not let one more lie from Scott deter us.

Well actually you did, and completely open bourders, and the unrestricted
flow of people between bourders without state control or oversite has
perpetually been one of the demands of the Libertarian party.

From your "let's not let ... Scot deter us." I take it that you are now
proposing or supporting the Libertarian pro-terrorist immigration policy?


Scott Douglas wrote:
>> I am constantly amazed at how mindless Libertarians actaully are when
>> they argue (perpetually) that the unconstrained and rampant progress
>> of every disease is better than a treatment that is not a perfect
>> cure.

Michael Price writes:
> And what evidence is there that present policies are even a
> band-aid?

Michael price asks a good question. If a crime has been prevented, how do
you know? Since no crime has take place there is no proof that it would
have.

Therefore why restrict immigration when there is no proof that crimes have
been prevented through immigration policy?

I sympathize.

I now ask Michael Price this question. If a car accident has been
prevented by slowing down a car that was about to be broadsided by another
car at an intersection, how does he know that the accident would have taken
place since no accident has occurred? There is no proof that the accident
would have happened.

Therefore why put breaks on cars when there is no proof that accidents are
prevented by them?


Michael Price writes:
> Present policies caused the anger that motivated 9/11 in the first
> place. They caused the stupidity and incompetence that allowed it to
> happen.

Shocking Libertarian price after demanding the opening of America's
bourders to terrorists is now blaming America for the terrorist act of 911.

Doesn't Mr. Price know that those people were "evil doers" and were
"motivated by an unjust hate for freedom."

Come on now Mr. Price. George Bush isn't lying to the american people
when he says such things.

You sound like you are working for the Taliban Mr. Price.

>> It is no coincidence that even now Libertarians of the ACLU are doing
>> their best to defend the terrorists who were captured after 911.

Michael Price writes:
> Damn right it's not.

Yes the motivation is all too clear. The Libertarian ideology is
fundamentally anti-american.


Michael Price writes:
> People have rights, not priveliges to be withdrawn
> once a bureaucrat cries terrorist.

"What's wrong with a little less freedom." - George Bush Jr.


Michael price writes:
> If you are so sure that restrictions on rights are the best way to
> combat terrorism go to Columbia where I'm sure they'll infringe your
> rights. Of course the terrorists might kill you but hell I don't
> care.

Columbia? Which side do you support Mr. Price? The socialist freedom
fighters, or the Fascist government that is supported by teh United States?


From the Libertarian party platform

Immigration

...

We welcome all refugees to our country and condemn the efforts of
U.S. officials to create a new "Berlin Wall" which would keep them
captive. We condemn the U.S. government's policy of barring
those
refugees from our country and preventing Americans from assisting
their passage to help them escape tyranny or improve their
economic prospects.

Undocumented non-citizens should not be denied the fundamental
freedom to labor and to move about unmolested. Furthermore,
immigration must not be restricted for reasons of race, religion,
political creed, age, or sexual preference.

We therefore call for the elimination of all restrictions
on immigration, the abolition of the Immigration and
Naturalization Service and the Border Patrol, and a declaration
of full amnesty for all people who have entered the country
illegally. We oppose government welfare and resettlement
payments to non-citizens just as we oppose government welfare
payments to all other persons.

0 new messages