Agnosticism is more LOGICAL
Bill Gates
"Wen-King Su" <wen-...@myri.com> wrote in message
news:beccj4$k...@neptune.myri-local.com...
> In a previous article "Bill Gates" <bi...@microsaused.com> writes:
> :
> ;
> :"Wen-King Su" <wen-...@myri.com> wrote in message
> ;news:bec6gk$i...@neptune.myri-local.com...
> :> In a previous article "Bill Gates" <bi...@microsaused.com> writes:
> ;>
> :> ;> You're certainly claiming that *someone* is able to falsify "There
is
> ;> :> no X" in any case.
> :> ;
> ;> :That is not what is being said, knucklehead.
> :>
> ;> What is being said, of course, is that every X has demonstrateable
> :> characteristcs.
> ;
> :Not at all, since some X do not exist, they are just part of somebody's
> ;delusional disorder, so they do not have any "demonstrateable
> :characteristics" [sic] at all.
>
> Bad logic. Prove that because some X do not exist as they are part of
> somebody's delusional disorder, it must be that all X that is not
> somebody's delusional disorder must have demonstratable characteristics.
Well duh! If a thing exists, it exists as everything else exists, as part of
the web of relationships between everything that exists, eh?
Wen-King Su
:
;
:"Wen-King Su" <wen-...@myri.com> wrote in message
That is not what was asked. Prove that because some X do not exist as
Virgil
bi...@microsaused.com wrote on 7/7/03 12:58:
> Well duh!
The quality of intellect represented by that remark is typical of its
author.
Bill Gates
the web of relationships between everything that exists, eh? If you cannot
demonstrate your particular hypothetical X so that "There is no X is
falsifiED that is not my problem, it is yours. That does not alter the fact
that "There is no X is falsifiABLE" in any case. Just demonstrate your X.
Why would you object to that if you know that your particular X is something
real, something about which you can demonstrate how you know it exists?
Wen-King Su
:
;
:"Wen-King Su" <wen-...@myri.com> wrote in message
Again, that is not what is asked. You made an assertion that required
proof. Prove that because some X do not exist as they are part of