Mind in Super Cosmos
Jack Sarfatti
On Tuesday, November 18, 2003, at 12:42 PM, Barbara T..wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: Jack Sarfatti
To: Barbara Tacchi
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:43 AM
Subject: Re: physics and physiology
Physiology is an emergent macro-quantum process from the underlying
micro-quantum infrastructure.
Perception must be explained by physics not the other way around.
This is what every physicist thinks.
In the way physicists think it makes no sense to try to derive
objective physics from subjective inner experiences triggered by
our perceptions.
On Sunday, November 16, 2003, at 03:31 PM, Barbara wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: Jack Sarfatti
To: Barbara
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 11:59 PM
Subject: Re: physics and physiology
Yes. I was in Rome only a few weeks ago. I plan to return perhaps in
March for a few days.
My ideas on all this are in
http://qedcorp.com/APS/StarGate1.mov
and in other documents in
http://qedcorp.com/APS/
On Sunday, November 16, 2003, at 02:52 PM, Barbara wrote:
May I send a work on a new interpretation of the collapse of wave
function based on physiology?
... Roma
Dear Sarfatti
I will be glad to have your opinion. Every observer is behind a
physical apparatus of perception. No one can have more bit of
information than that transported from optic nerve that have about 1
million of axons. Every axon can transport only 200 bits in a second.
The fact that every observer is inside a particular apparatus have a
determinant role in physics. Saluti Oscar (I send you the work)
"Dear Sarfatti
There is nothing of subjective in a physical apparatus of perception."
Yes, of course. However modern experimental physics is not based upon
the complex structure of the human perceptual apparatus of which we know
very little especially at the level of the "hard problem" i.e. the
transduction of sensory nerve impulses, chemical messengers et-al into
the inner stream of self-awareness of our conscious knowledge such as
now when we are communicating. I have some definite ideas on how that
all works of course summarized in http://qedcorp.com/APS/StarGate1.mov
BTW do you know ... in Rome?
Back to what I was saying, our operational procedures are based on much
simpler electronic devices.
The whole idea of theoretical physics is objective invariance
independent of a particular frame of reference which in this case
includes the contingent details of the human perceptual apparatus. This
is a generalization of Plato's theory of forms and Einstein's notion
that coordinates are not important i.e. the map is not the territory in
Alfred Korzybskii's terms.
For example Einstein's local geometrodynamic field equation in stringy
notation including the exotic vacuum zero point energy density term for
"dark energy/matter" is
Guv(geometry) + /\(zero point energy density)guv(geometry)
= (string tension)^-1Tuv(ordinary matter/radiation)
Must be totally independent of the contingent evolutionary structure of
the the human perceptual apparatus, or any such apparatus.
There is a kind of intrinsic mental dimension to Super Cosmos that
Wheeler alludes to in his famous
"IT FROM BIT"
or
"Geometry-Matter" from "Cosmic Mind of God"
if you like
that has a more detailed implementation in Bohm's earlier BIT pilot wave
of "active information" +
IT "hidden variable", i.e. IT system point rolling on a BIT landscape.
I say inner consciousness is generated in any sufficiently complex open
system from adding
"BIT FROM IT"
IT FROM BIT + BIT FROM IT = Spontaneously conscious self-organization
i.e. the "system point" is no longer a passive "test particle" rolling
on a rigid landscape
but is an inseparable part of the organic active observer-participator
receiving its marching orders
from the BIT landscape whilst simultaneously modifying the shape of that
landscape, the whole
open system pumped off equilibrium at all levels and scales (macro and
micro) by the sensory
stream of chemical and electrical signals.
"Physics is made from an observer that stay behind this
apparatus.
However thankyou Oscar"