Opinions expressed herein are my own and may not represent those of my employer.
I am certain that the width is determined by the isotope shifts rather than
the more common broadening mechanisms like pressure, Doppler, or
self-absorption.
Bret Cannon
Steve Eckhardt <skeck...@mmm.com.deletethis> wrote in message
news:a6jdh2$43p$1...@magnum.mmm.com...
> Edmund Scientific sells monochromatic light sources that consist of a mercury
> lamp, a diffuser and a green narrow-band filter. Does anyone know what the
> coherence length of such a device might be? (What's the spectral width of this
> peak for a low pressure Hg lamp?)
We are using a high-pressure Hg arc for microscope-based interferometry. In my
experience, the "raw" peak (<5 nm FWHM, I think) gives a coherence length less than
0.5 mm. Which is good, because we don't get secondary fringes from the microsope
optics themselves...
Don't know what the difference would be between the high- and low-pressure arcs. I
don't think the high pressure arc is high enough to cause pressure broadening.
If the filter is narrower than the Hg line, you get a proportional increase in the
coherence length at a decrease in output intensity.
I think the main use for the above instrument is for Newton's rings or Fizeau-type
fringes between two glass surfaces. As long as the space is small (and it usually
is for flats and large curvature lenses) it's great - some guys in the next lab over
have one.
--
Andy Resnick, Ph.D.
Optical Physicist
Northrop Grumman