Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Coherence length of Hg 546 nm line

371 views
Skip to first unread message

Steve Eckhardt

unread,
Mar 11, 2002, 6:10:26 PM3/11/02
to
Edmund Scientific sells monochromatic light sources that consist of a mercury
lamp, a diffuser and a green narrow-band filter. Does anyone know what the
coherence length of such a device might be? (What's the spectral width of this
peak for a low pressure Hg lamp?)
--
Best regards,
Steve Eckhardt (skeck...@mmm.com)

Opinions expressed herein are my own and may not represent those of my employer.

Bret Cannon

unread,
Mar 12, 2002, 12:17:29 AM3/12/02
to
Many years ago I worked in a lab that purchased at 1.5 meter monochromator
that could be double passed, and the acceptance test was to scan the green
line from a low pressure Hg lamp, resolve the different isotopic lines and
from the ratio of the measured width of a given peak to the distance between
a particular pair of the isotopic lines the resolution of the monochromator
was calculated. The minimum resolution for acceptance was 300,000. As I
recall, the full width of the hyperfine spectrum was about 10 times the
width of a single line, thus the linewidth was about 546 nm/30,000 = 0.02 nm
= 0.7 wavenumber.

I am certain that the width is determined by the isotope shifts rather than
the more common broadening mechanisms like pressure, Doppler, or
self-absorption.

Bret Cannon


Steve Eckhardt <skeck...@mmm.com.deletethis> wrote in message
news:a6jdh2$43p$1...@magnum.mmm.com...

Andy Resnick

unread,
Mar 12, 2002, 8:03:39 AM3/12/02
to
Steve Eckhardt wrote:

> Edmund Scientific sells monochromatic light sources that consist of a mercury
> lamp, a diffuser and a green narrow-band filter. Does anyone know what the
> coherence length of such a device might be? (What's the spectral width of this
> peak for a low pressure Hg lamp?)

We are using a high-pressure Hg arc for microscope-based interferometry. In my
experience, the "raw" peak (<5 nm FWHM, I think) gives a coherence length less than
0.5 mm. Which is good, because we don't get secondary fringes from the microsope
optics themselves...

Don't know what the difference would be between the high- and low-pressure arcs. I
don't think the high pressure arc is high enough to cause pressure broadening.

If the filter is narrower than the Hg line, you get a proportional increase in the
coherence length at a decrease in output intensity.

I think the main use for the above instrument is for Newton's rings or Fizeau-type
fringes between two glass surfaces. As long as the space is small (and it usually
is for flats and large curvature lenses) it's great - some guys in the next lab over
have one.

--
Andy Resnick, Ph.D.
Optical Physicist
Northrop Grumman


0 new messages