In the above discussion about refraction at aspheric surfaces, I had
derived eccentricity = refractive index for Plano-hyperbolic lens for
constant path length from reference planar section to the other focus
in vacuum. By the same token, a Plano-concave lens should radiate rays
as if emerging from first focus of denser medium. Right?
Now parabolic case is special to the hyperbolic, in that its
eccentricity = 1.
Does this mean that incident rays suffer no defection at all? And the
Plano-convex Parabolic Lens and Plano-concave Parabolic Lens behave
just like a normal incidence thick parallel faced plate? And this was
known from Descartes times? Where could be an error?
Among others, may I request participants in that thread to comment here
also? TIA
Narasimham