Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Kodak Brushing Lacquer No. 4, Dull Black

369 views
Skip to first unread message

Jim Klein

unread,
Mar 9, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/9/99
to
Kodak used to sell the most durable black brushing lacquer on the
planet.

It could be used inside lens barrels to kill reflections and it could
be used to retouch semi-gloss black exterior camera parts by simply
burnishing the coating after it dried.

On a clean surface it was almost impossible to scratch with a finger
nail.

I found 4 bottles 5 years ago in a camera shop in Fort Bragg, Ca so I
have my lifetime supply.

Does anyone know why it was mysteriously pulled from production?

Does it cause birth defects or something because it was not pulled of
the market because it didn't work.

And NO, there are no model paints which even come close to being an a
reasonable substitue.

Jim Klein


RAnder3127

unread,
Mar 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/11/99
to
>Kodak used to sell the most durable black brushing lacquer on the
>planet.

One optics mfg. uses 40-grit garnet or
aluminum sandpaper painted with
Krylon Ultra Flat Black paint.
-Rich


"Let us strive to eliminate movies like Scream
and She's All That. Take it all, all the latte-sucking,
CD-selling, product-positioning JUNK that is this
movie genre and BURN it!"

Bram Vingerling

unread,
Mar 13, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/13/99
to
Jim,

The discussion about matte black paint is like a comet, coming again
every x-years. Nextel Black Velvet is still available and in many
people´s opinion
"the best there is".

It is produced by this German company:

Company : Mackiewicz GmbH in Hamburg, Germany
Telefon : +49-40-751030; Fax:+49-40-75103375
Lack : 81121,Nextel Velvet, Schwarz (black),1kg 5kg 25kg
Thinner : 8061, Nextel Thinner

Best Regards,
Bram Vingerling

Jim Klein schrieb:


>
> Kodak used to sell the most durable black brushing lacquer on the
> planet.
>

> It could be used inside lens barrels to kill reflections and it could
> be used to retouch semi-gloss black exterior camera parts by simply
> burnishing the coating after it dried.
>
> On a clean surface it was almost impossible to scratch with a finger
> nail.
>
> I found 4 bottles 5 years ago in a camera shop in Fort Bragg, Ca so I
> have my lifetime supply.
>
> Does anyone know why it was mysteriously pulled from production?
>
> Does it cause birth defects or something because it was not pulled of
> the market because it didn't work.
>
> And NO, there are no model paints which even come close to being an a
> reasonable substitue.
>
> Jim Klein

--
----------------------------------------------------------
IBV-Ing.Büro Vingerling Optical Thin Films
Production consultant for precision optics and ophthalmics
Schulgasse 2, D-35415 Pohlheim, Germany
Tel.:+49(0)641-48713 Fax:-47762 b.ving...@t-online.de
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/ibv_engineering/
----------------------------------------------------------

Jim Klein

unread,
Mar 13, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/13/99
to
kdpo...@kdpoptics.com (Jim Klein) wrote:

>Kodak used to sell the most durable black brushing lacquer on the
>planet.

>It could be used inside lens barrels to kill reflections and it could
>be used to retouch semi-gloss black exterior camera parts by simply
>burnishing the coating after it dried.

>On a clean surface it was almost impossible to scratch with a finger
>nail.

>I found 4 bottles 5 years ago in a camera shop in Fort Bragg, Ca so I
>have my lifetime supply.

>Does anyone know why it was mysteriously pulled from production?

>Does it cause birth defects or something because it was not pulled of
>the market because it didn't work.

>And NO, there are no model paints which even come close to being an a
>reasonable substitue.

>Jim Klein

Do the people answering these posts ever read the questions first?
Somehow I think not.

I know there are a lot of black materials out there. I never asked
about substitues, I was asking if anyone knew why this product
vanished? If you don't know, please don't reply. It wastes band width.

OK?

Jim Klein


Alan Shinn

unread,
Mar 13, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/13/99
to
Jim Klein wrote:

>
> Do the people answering these posts ever read the questions first?
> Somehow I think not.
>
> I know there are a lot of black materials out there. I never asked
> about substitues, I was asking if anyone knew why this product
> vanished? If you don't know, please don't reply. It wastes band width.
>
> OK?
>
> Jim Klein


Jim:
I sort of disagree with you. Frequently, as threads expand and evolve,
there seems to be much to learn.
However, it would probably be good to note the change in the subject
line.
--
Looking forward:
Alan Shinn


Experience the
beginnings of microscopy.
Make or buy your own replica
of one of Antony van Leeuwenhoek's microscopes.
visit http://www.sirius.com/~alshinn/


Bram Vingerling

unread,
Mar 13, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/13/99
to
Jim i did read your mail before answerring,

you wrote, I quote:


>And NO, there are no model paints which even come close to being an a
>reasonable substitue."

Well I don´t agree with that and I doubt you ever used or compared
Nextel with your Kodak stuff.

Bram

Jim Klein schrieb:
>......

Louis Boyd

unread,
Mar 14, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/14/99
to
Jim Klein wrote:
>
> Do the people answering these posts ever read the questions first?
> Somehow I think not.
>
> I know there are a lot of black materials out there. I never asked
> about substitues, I was asking if anyone knew why this product
> vanished? If you don't know, please don't reply. It wastes band width.
>
> OK?
>
> Jim Klein

Other people besides you read replys to your questions. I found the
response about Nextel Black Velvet to be the most useful response to
your question about why the Kodak product is scarce. Besides, compared
to all the .GIF files and advertising floating around on the internet
the entire set of postings to sci.optics since the Internet was formed
has used negligable bandwidth. Ease up.

Lou Boyd

Louis Boyd

unread,
Mar 14, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/14/99
to
Bram Vingerling wrote:
>
> Jim i did read your mail before answerring,
>
> you wrote, I quote:
> >And NO, there are no model paints which even come close to being an a
> >reasonable substitue."
>
> Well I don´t agree with that and I doubt you ever used or compared
> Nextel with your Kodak stuff.
>
> Bram
>
> Jim Klein schrieb:
> >......
> > Do the people answering these posts ever read the questions first?
> > Somehow I think not.
> >
> > I know there are a lot of black materials out there. I never asked
> > about substitues, I was asking if anyone knew why this product
> > vanished? If you don't know, please don't reply. It wastes band width.
> >
> > OK?
> >
> > Jim Klein

Does anyone know of a US distributor for the Nextel Velvet Black
product?

Lou Boyd
Fairborn Observatory

Jim Klein

unread,
Mar 14, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/14/99
to
So then I guess no one knows why the Kodak stuff is gone.

That's cool.

Jim


0 new messages