Open Letter to Editors of PRAVDA in Moscow on WMD
Jack Sarfatti
To the editors of PRAVDA
re: your online article
http://english.pravda.ru/science/19/94/379/12737_weapons.html
American military is pursuing new types of exotic weapons
05/11/2004 12:43
Gary Bekkum mentions my name and ideas extensively in your article. Much
of his material is taken from previous documents I have shared with him
over the past years that are collected in the open public directories:
http://stardrive.org/
http://stardrive.org/Jack/
http://qedcorp.com/APS/
http://qedcorp.com/London/
http://qedcorp.com/destiny/
the latter directory includes a free online copy of my latest book
"Super Cosmos" soon to be published
Two previous books from 2002 "Destiny Matrix" and "Space-Time and Beyond
II" give many background details to Gary Bekkum's article.
They are available from http://amazon.com et-al
Some key comments on Gary's article:
As far as I know I am the only physicist so far to claim:
" that the invisible gravitating dark matter could be the other side of
the invisible dark energy coin, and that suggests the possibility of
manipulating the vacuum for energy release. If a controllable parameter
could be found to mediate the balance between the invisible dark forces,
the result would unleash the vacuum energy of creation in all of its
awful power and majesty. If it were possible to control the dark sides
of the force then spacetime, the arena where everything we know takes
place, could be bent and twisted with infinitely greater ease than was
ever suspected. This would open Pandora's box to everything from vacuum
energy weapons of mass destruction (capable of destroying the universe!)
to spacetime warp drives and time machines."
Gary claims "some physicists." That's news to me. Who are the others?
My unique and original claim, documented in my two books from 2002, is
that both anti-gravitating dark energy and gravitating dark matter are
forms of exotic quantum vacuum of differing degrees of coherence of
negative and positive zero point pressure respectively. Control of the
quantum pressure field distribution permits "Alcubierre" time-like
geodesic zero g-force "acceleration field" (Paul Hill's book
"Unconventional Flying Objects") "G-Engine" (George Trimble, 1956
described in Nick Cook's book "The Hunt for Zero Point"), "negative
matter propulsion" of Herman Bondi and Stalin's WWII physics spy master
Yakov Petrovich Terletsky. Note that I am interviewed on Niels Bohr and
Terletsky in Pavel and Anatoli Sudoplatov's "Special Tasks" - the later
"Updated Edition with "New Foreword by Robert Conquest of the Stanford
Hoover Institution pp.483-4
My theory of dark matter as a virtual process, unlike all the competing
theories of exotic super symmetry partner particles predicts that no
dark matter detector will "click" with the right stuff, only with false
positives as recently shown in
http://www.nature.com/nsu/040503/040503-7.html showing that recent
Italian claims of dark matter particles are wrong.
The dark matter detectors will show a null result just as the
Michelson-Morley interferometer failed to show the motion of the Earth
through the "aether." See also "The Waiting Game" by Geoff Brumfiel,
Nature, 6 May 2004, pp.10-11
"The ... Cryogenic Dark Matter Search has run for 14 years, the latest
detector ... have found no new particles."
They never will if my unique original theory is correct. I am not aware
of any other physicist making that strong falsifiable prediction based
on a coherent picture of the emergent origin of Einstein's gravitational
field.
Also, I am, to my knowledge the first to suggest the possibility of
exotic gamma ray weapons using nuclear isomer transitions way back in
1962-64 from my work with George Parrent, Jr at Tech/Ops in Lexington,
Mass in same building with Mitre Corporation back then. I worked on the
concept with Hans Bethe at Cornell's on the third floor of the Newman
Laboratory for Nuclear Studies in that time period as well. Bethe
discouraged my idea of making a "gamma ray laser" saying that the "cross
section numbers were not good enough." I had previously worked with
Bethe in my senior year at Cornell 1960 on fixing an error in
Schwinger's calculation of the polarization of synchrotron radiation off
the plane of the electron orbits. I discovered the error as part of the
Bethe's senior honors seminar in experimental tests of special
relativity. Peter Goldreich was also in that small seminar of maybe six
students. Also I should add that George Chapline, Jr. and I knew each
other in La Jolla, CA in 1966-67. We were part of the group that Greg
Benford describes in his sci-fi book "Timescape" dealing with the
physics of “signal nonlocality” from future to past that is very much a
part of my post-quantum physics of Dick Bierman’s “presponse” beyond
orthodox micro-quantum theory. Post-quantum (AKA “macro-quantum”)
theory is a covering theory of micro-quantum theory. Covering theories
are like the New Testament compared to the Old Testament – new wine in
new bottles. What is not possible in the theory, may be possible in the
covering theory and vice versa. Einstein’s general relativity of
gravity from 1915 is a covering theory of his special relativity from
1905. It is not possible to describe gravity only with special
relativity. That is why Hal Puthoff’s “PV” theory of metric engineering
is wrong. It is possible to have global inertial frames (GIF) in
special relativity, but they are not possible in general relativity
where they are replaced by local inertial frames (LIF) that do not
rotate and move along free float weightless zero g-force “timelike
geodesics,” which are the straightest paths in curved space-time inside
the local light cone at each point and moment on the path. This is the
significant difference that curvature makes. Similarly, micro-quantum
theory obeys “signal locality” so that you, for example, cannot clone a
photon. You cannot use the nonlocal entanglement of the
Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen effect for a stand-alone untappable
command-control-communication (C3) system. You always need a second
classical signal as the “key” to unlock the coded message hidden and
stored in the nonlocal entanglement beyond space-time. You can code the
message nonlocally but you cannot decode it locally. This quantum
cryptography/teleportation game changes dramatically when we leave the
domain of validity of micro-quantum theory and go to the broader domain
of macro or post-quantum theory where we now get stand-alone “signal
nonlocality” necessary for our own inner consciousness as well as the
paranormal phenomena like the CIA study of “remote viewing” by Puthoff
and Targ at SRI in the 1970’s. Antony Valentini has shown that the
domain of post-quantum theory is that of “sub-quantum nonequilibrium” in
the sense of Bohm’s hidden variable pilot wave theory extended by J.P.
Vigier. This new development also may mean that Lenny Susskind loses
his debate with Stephen Hawking on information loss down a black hole
real or imaginary? Hawking says “real”, Susskind says “imaginary,” i.e.
the information is not really lost.
I was the senior physicist at Joe Firmage's ISSO that Bekkum mentions
and I introduced Creon Levit to Joe and encouraged him to take a leave
from NASA to direct ISSO Science for Joe.
Finally Bekkum writes:
"Some French, Serbian and Ukrainian physicists have been working on new
theories of extended electrons and solitons, so perhaps a sub-quantum
bomb is not entirely out of the question."
Bekkum fails to acknowledge J.P. Vigier as the leader of this project.
Vigier, long time assistant to Louis DeBroglie and Hero of The French
Resistance and member of the French Communist Party, died in Paris only
a few days ago. The idea of "tight atomic electron states" from a
spatially extended electron "Bohm hidden variable" is Vigier's. Serbian
physicists in Beograd were testing Vigier's idea 1999-2000. I am not
sure if the Ukranians were in touch with Vigier? Vigier came to ISSO
here in San Francisco several times. There are photos of those visits in
my autobiography "Destiny Matrix." I am still actively working on
Vigier's ideas and I suspect there is something to it. More details are
in my book "Super Cosmos" on the idea G* ~ 1040G on scale of 1 fermi
explaining the unsolved problem of the stability of the electron. In my
theory of the dark matter as gravitating exotic vacuum with positive
zero point pressure, the single spatially extended electron of Vigier’s
theory of tight atomic states is stable against its self-electric charge
for the same reason that the stars in our galaxy do not fly off into
space - from the fall of Newton's apple to Kepler’s elliptical motion of
the planets round the Sun out beyond to the Galactic Halo and then zoom
in with a wavelet transform to the interior of a single electron whose
positive zero point pressure prevents the electric charge from
exploding. As the Techgnostic Hermetic Alchemist Kabbalahists say "As
Above, So Below."