A review of all those funny 9-11 coincidences. These little things when
viewed together tend to get people asking questions. This list will
expand gradually over the next few weeks. All these points have links or
references to mainstream news organisations or other reliable sources.
Anti-terrorism task-force takes out hundreds of Islamic websites just
days before Sept 11th. To keep them quiet after the attack?
San Francisco Mayor warned not to fly the night before the attacks
Jeb Bush amends an executive order giving emergency power to FEMA. He
changed it on September 7th 2001 to include terrorist attacks
John Ashcroft was not flying on commercial jets in July 2001 - only in
chartered jets due to a threat assessment. Funny that..
Rule that allowed pilots to carry guns in the cockpit was rescinded 2
months before 9-11 (had been in place since 1961) in spite of the fact
that warnings were given about potential hijackings in the same month....
Salman Rushdie (remember him?) was banned from taking internal flights in
US and Canada the week before the attack
Pentagon officials suddenly develop a fear of flying- on Sept 10th. We
didn't know! Sorry we forgot to increase security in the airports.
The Pentagon had been planning for a plane crashing into the building
The emergency plan for the unlikely event of a plane hitting the Pentagon
was drafted by the pilot of flight 77 (Former US Navy, Charles
Burlingame) which crashed into the Pentagon. (Washington Post 9/16/01)
On Sept 11th, about 4 miles from Dulles Airport where one of the hijacked
planes took off, the National Reconnaissance Office (linked to CIA) was
carrying out a disaster preparedness simulation of a plane crashing into
their building.
Operation Amalgam Virgo - a simulated multiple plane hijacking scenario
was planned prior to Sept 11th but carried out later on. The point being
"how could we have foreseen something like this?" is a lie.
A simulated terrorist attack was scheduled for Sept 12th. The Emergency
Command Centre in Building 7 was destroyed, but the comm centre
ultimately ended up on Pier 7, the site selected for the drill the next
day.
Naval Officer, Bernard Brown had a conversation with his son about not
being afraid of dying just before he put him on Flight 77, the plane that
crashed into the Pentagon. Had Bernard Brown been at work that day he
would have been killed as the plane carrying his son crashed into his
office at the Pentagon . Luckily he had taken a rare day off to play
golf.
Pakistani boy points at WTC on Sept 6th and says: "Those buildings will
not be there next week" Which means that someone, somewhere, knew for
certain that the buildings would definitely collapse. Which means there
were explosive devices in the building.
The invasion of Afghanistan was planned well in advance of Sept 11th and
some neighbouring countries were informed of these plans prior to the
attacks. (BBC)
Former FBI terrorism chief John O'Neill had become frustrated by his
investigations into Osama Bin Laden being thwarted by American oil
interests. He had told two French journalists that oil company
negotiations with the Taliban about access to the oil in central Asia
were preventing him from investigating Islamic terrorism. The
coincidence? He was killed on the second day of his new job as security
director in the World Trade Center, Sept 11th 2001.
X-files spin-off "The Lone Gunmen" aired in March 2001. The plot
involves government operatives crashing of a plane into the World Trade
Center using remote control technology. The plan to blame terrorists in
order to keep tensions high and increase arms sales.
People who were nearly in the World Trade Center on Sept 11th include:
Jackie Chan. He was scheduled to film on the roof early that morning but
it was cancelled due to a late script. The film featured a terrorist plot
to blow up the statue of liberty.
The Duchess of York, Sarah Ferguson was late for a scheduled meeting on
the 101st floor of one of the buildings at 8.45.
Jim Pierce, managing director of AON Corporation had arranged a meeting
on the 105th floor of the WTC. Due to the size of the group they moved to
the Millennium hotel across the street. He is George Bush's Cousin
(Ananova)
Warren Buffet (2nd richest man in the world) was holding a golf event on
Sept 11th, coincidentally at the U.S. Strategic Command headquarters
located at Offutt Air Force Base in Omaha. The first coincidence being
that this was where G.W.Bush was flown later that day "for safety." The
big coincidence being that a number of CEOs from big companies in the WTC
were present. Anne Tatlock of Fiduciary Trust was there, she would have
been killed as Flight 175 flew into her office.
A French Newspaper, Le Figaro, reported that Bin Laden was in Dubai for
Kidney treatment in July 2001. He was visited by the local CIA agent who
later bragged about the meeting. (Guardian)
A band called "I am the World Trade Center" released a CD in July 2001.
The eleventh track on the CD was titled "September."
"The Inner City Hustlers" released Time to Explode in July. Its cover
features two towers resembling the WTC buildings rocked by an explosion.
Rap group "The Coup" were scheduled to release an album in Nov. The
cover, designed in July depicted an explosion half way up the World Trade
Center. Metal band Dream Theater released its three-disc concert album,
Live Scenes From New York, Tuesday, the same day as the assault. The
album's cover features the Manhattan skyline -- including the Statue of
Liberty and World Trade Center -- engulfed in a fireball above a big
apple wrapped in twine. (Houston Chronicle)
Tele Trieste, German band released an album in Jun 2001 with the cover
shown below.
"Trade Center Defender" a macromedia game, was hosted for part of 2001
on Angelfire Arcade. (See image below) You had to shoot planes flying
towards a pair of office buildings which collapse if the planes get
through. The filename was WTC.EXE.
There was an unexplained surge of financial transactions in the WTC just
prior to the attacks. Over $100,000,000 were rushed through the
computers, but this was picked up by the German company Convar who were
recovering data from hard disks in the building.
Insider trading. A stock market term, "put" option is effectively a bet
that the value of a stock will decrease. There was a surge in "put"
options purchased for American Airlines, United Airlines and some
companies with offices in the WTC. CIA executive director "Buzzy"
Krongard managed the firm that handled "put" options on UAL
The father of the alleged hijacker ringleader Mohamed Atta, Mohamed El-
Amir, claims his son phoned him on Sept 12th. He is a respected Egyptian
business man.
Pakistani ISI chief General Mahmood Ahmed gives orders to wire $100,000
to Mohamed Atta in the summer of 2001. General Ahmad was meeting with CIA
Head George Tenet on the 4th to 9th Sept 2001. On Sept 11th he was at a
breakfast meeting at the Capitol with the chairmen of the House and
Senate Intelligence Committees Sen Bob Graham and Rep Porter Goss.
The man who actually wired the money to Mohamed Atta is called Ahmad Omar
Saeed Sheik. He was sentenced to death for the murder of American
journalist Daniel Pearl, who was in Pakistan investigating shoe-bomber
Richard Reid.
George W. Bush's brother was on the board of directors of a company that
handled security for the WTC, Dulles and United.
According to USA Today, the FAA operations manager, Ben Sliney gave the
order to clear the skies on 9-11. It was his first day on the job.
Only 189 people died in the Pentagon because Flight77 flew horizontally
into Wedge 1 just after its $258,000,000 strengthening program was
completed. 4600 workers were still out of their offices on that day.
Presumably the hijackers not only wanted to save as many lives as
possible but wanted to help the Pentagon by testing out the blast
resistant glass and steel reinforced concrete walls.
Tele Trieste Cover
Old list (now a bit out of date)
Coincidences and Other Anomalies
Something good to show people who will only believe what they read in
trashy tabloid newspapers. I use the term "coincidence" very loosely...
Pakistani boy points at WTC on Sept 6th and says: "Those buildings will
not be there next week"
After reading the above article it is well worth reading about the links
between the Pakistani ISI and the Sept 11th attacks
X-files spin-off "The Lone Gunmen" aired in March 2001.
"Byers goes back to his father's home and finds Bert there. Bert slaps
him and says he should not have gotten involved. The 12D plan is for a
small group of government operatives to crash a jetliner into New York
City in order to keep tensions high and increase arms sales."
"They realize that the airplane will be remote controlled, just like
Bert's car was. Talking by phone to the Gunmen's office, Byers asks
Langly and Frohike to hack into the aircraft controls. They do and
discover that the plane is programmed to crash into the World Trade
Center. Bert enters the cockpit and tries to warn the aircrew, but they
don't believe him. Making a lunge, he deactivates the autopilot and the
crew realizes that they are not in control. They have 22 minutes before
they hit the building. Langly can't break the encryption on the aircraft
control system --- his computer doesn't have the processing power and the
computer keeps freezing. Frohike slips next door to the firing range and
finds Yves there. He needs the Octium but she is not impressed by the
need to save people's lives. Frohike points out that her name is an
anagram for "Lee Harvey Oswald" and says he knows who she is. She uses
the Octium in her laptop to somehow assist Langly break the encryption
and give the pilots control of the aircraft again. The plane barely
misses the skyscraper."
If only these people were real.
Donald Rumsfeld's Psychic Powers
Rumsfeld magically predicts there will be another major event to justify
defense spending - minutes before the planes hit the WTC.
"Ironically, just moments before the Department of Defense was hit by a
suicide hijacker, Secretary Rumsfeld was describing to me why America
needs to abandon its decade-old two-major-war strategy, and focus on the
real threat facing us in the 21st century: terrorism, and the
unexpected. "
"And let me tell you, I've been around the block a few times. There will
be another event." He repeated it for emphasis: "There will be another
event."
Within minutes of that utterance, Rumsfeld's words proved
tragically prophetic.
Jeb Bush and his amazing Psychic Powers
Jeb created an executive order granting powers to the National Guard in
the event of an emergency in Florida. He decided to amend and reissue
this order on the 9th Sept 2001 to include terrorist attacks. What a
coincidence.
Dan Rather interview in which a FEMA spokesman claims to have arrived in
NYC the night before the attacks
Idiot monkey boy gives the game away. Bush appears to be saying he
watched the first plane hit the WTC live. It takes about 2 seconds of
thought to work out what is wrong with this picture.
San Francisco Mayor warned not to fly the night before the attacks
Ashcroft was not flying on commercial jets in July 2001 - only in
chartered jets due to a threat assessment. Funny that..
Four days BEFORE 9/11, the FBI raided and closed the primary Arab news
source on the web and refused to explain why
Something funny with www.archive.org?
Rule that allowed pilots to carry guns in the cockpit was rescinded 2
months before 9-11 (had been in place since 1961) in spite of the fact
that warnings were given about potential hijackings in the same month....
Salman Rushdie (remember him?) was banned from taking internal flights in
US and Canada the week before the attack
The original link has now gone
Here it is in the internet archive but just in case it disappears from
the archive I've saved a copy of it here
Pentagon officials suddenly develop a fear of flying- I would imagine top
psychic Donaldo Rumsfeldo probably read their tarot cards
<< On Sept. 10, NEWSWEEK has learned, a group of top Pentagon officials
suddenly cancelled travel plans for the next morning, apparently because
of security concerns. >>
Isn't it lucky that the Pentagon had been planning for a plane crashing
into the building (but nothing like this has ever happened before and we
had no warning and we couldn't have stopped it and we don't have any
protection or defences really, really honest..........etc.)
Israeli text messages warning of the attack 2 hours before - unknown
senders
Mossad warned CIA of impending attacks a month before- (oh yeah and Iraq
are involved - any chance of an invasion?)
If Mossad knew in advance (and to their credit, attempted to warn people)
is it possible that the early rumours of Israelis being absent from the
WTC on Sept 11th could in fact be true?
Booklet from 1999 suggests terrorists might crash a plane into the
Pentagon
> "=Ö§âmâ ßÃÅ„ GORTICIAN=" <g...@buh.cuh> wrote in message
He seemed pretty pleased with himself about it too.
The translation I heard had him saying that he didn't expect the towers to
fall - just either burn above the impact or maybe collapse to that point ?
The fact that the towers *did* fall may have been due to an unforseen design
'deficiency'. I think it was softening of the steelwork that ultimately caused
the collapse. Hard to say since I don't expect the designers expected that
kind of treatment.
Graham
> Ralph Nesbitt wrote:
>
>> "=Ö§âmâ ßÃñ GORTICIAN=" <g...@buh.cuh> wrote in message
>> news:Xns949FFA356...@216.168.3.44...
>> > http://www.the-movement.com/
>> >
>> > A review of all those funny 9-11 coincidences. These little things
>> > when viewed together tend to get people asking questions. This list
>> > will expand gradually over the next few weeks. All these points
>> > have links or references to mainstream news organisations or other
>> > reliable sources.
>>
>> You failed to include Osama Bin Laden taking credit for planning &
>> executeing the events of 9/11/01.
>> Ralph Nesbitt
>> Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type
>
> He seemed pretty pleased with himself about it too.
>
> The translation I heard had him saying that he didn't expect the
> towers to fall - just either burn above the impact or maybe collapse
> to that point ?
>
You mean the fake Osama, or the real one?
> The fact that the towers *did* fall may have been due to an unforseen
> design 'deficiency'. I think it was softening of the steelwork that
> ultimately caused the collapse. Hard to say since I don't expect the
> designers expected that kind of treatment.
>
>
> Graham
And of course, another building fell in the same manner, with no plane
hitting it...
Later said to have been 'pulled' by the NYFD and Larry Silverstein.
> You mean the fake Osama, or the real one?
Which do *you* mean ? How many Osama bin Ladens are there ?
You know the real one ? Prison for you sunshine :-)
Graham
>
> Don Dirk of Dowdawee wrote:
>
>> You mean the fake Osama, or the real one?
>
> Which do *you* mean ? How many Osama bin Ladens are there ?
There are two. See the videotapes for comparison.
> You know the real one ? Prison for you sunshine :-)
>
>
> Graham
You wish, GayBladE.
--
Troll my message board and I will beat your ass
http://www.latech.edu/tech/orgs/klpi/mboard/phpBB2/
yup seem to be a lot them huh!
the fake real one
Mugabe is the other one, but he was dealing with Tsvangari at the time
so couldnt make the party.
> Don Dirk of Dowdawee <sp...@snuhco.com> wrote in message
> news:<Xns949F8324C7A...@216.168.3.44>...
>> Pooh Bear <rabbitsfriend...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> news:40438362...@hotmail.com:
>>
>> > Ralph Nesbitt wrote:
>> >
>> >> "=Ö§âmâ ßÃñ GORTICIAN=" <g...@buh.cuh> wrote in message
>> >> news:Xns949FFA356...@216.168.3.44...
>> >> > http://www.the-movement.com/
>> >> >
>> >> > A review of all those funny 9-11 coincidences. These little
>> >> > things when viewed together tend to get people asking questions.
>> >> > This list will expand gradually over the next few weeks. All
>> >> > these points have links or references to mainstream news
>> >> > organisations or other reliable sources.
>> >>
>> >> You failed to include Osama Bin Laden taking credit for planning &
>> >> executeing the events of 9/11/01.
>> >> Ralph Nesbitt
>> >> Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type
>> >
>> > He seemed pretty pleased with himself about it too.
>> >
>> > The translation I heard had him saying that he didn't expect the
>> > towers to fall - just either burn above the impact or maybe
>> > collapse to that point ?
>> >
>>
>> You mean the fake Osama, or the real one?
>>
>
>
> the fake real one
Osama is apparently an ex CIA asset who has gone bad. Quite possibly he IS
either dead or dying of some type of disease and has gone down serving the
interests of his family and their global partners here and abroad. It is
ludicrous to think that a Saudi cave-man could have engineered 9/11 without
some help state-side.
--
Regards, UHD
Reading only in misc.survialism. alt.conspiracy, rec.outdoors.camping
The New World Order. Coming soon to a town near you.
www.infowars.com (Go Alex!)
> It is
> ludicrous to think that a Saudi cave-man could have engineered 9/11 without
> some help state-side.
You have to have a degree from Yale / whatever ? to realise that an airplane
full of fuel will do staggering damage to a large building ?
Get real.
Any fool could have thought of it.
Graham
Staggering damage? From witness accounts. The buildings merely swayed
slightly from the impact and then regained stability. Less movement than if
hit by a gale force wind which they were built to withstand.
Then theres the problem of how a hydrocarbon fire could produce enough heat
to melt steel beams. Then theres the problem of WTC-7. The list goes on and
on.
I won't stoop to name calling as so many here do. You are merely
uneducated.
what an ironic fuck hole.
its a well known fact that Bin Laden was funded by the CIA, during the
Afghan war with the Soviets. no news there then.. its been known
since the seventies.
he is on dialysis.
his family has fuck all to do with it.
hardly a saudi cave man. one of the richest men in the middle east.
of course he had help stateside. they were al quaeda islamists.
now fuck off back to your 'spiracy groups with your decades old
"ground breaking news"
> Ultimate Heat Death <R...@kidding.com> wrote in message
> news:<Xns949FE39...@216.168.3.44>...
>> Osama is apparently an ex CIA asset who has gone bad. Quite possibly
>> he IS either dead or dying of some type of disease and has gone down
>> serving the interests of his family and their global partners here
>> and abroad. It is ludicrous to think that a Saudi cave-man could have
>> engineered 9/11 without some help state-side.
>
> what an ironic fuck hole.
I suppose you meant to call me a MORONIC fuckhole(one word).
>
> its a well known fact that Bin Laden was funded by the CIA, during the
> Afghan war with the Soviets. no news there then.. its been known
> since the seventies.
I just said that. but there are new people who come into the groups who are
not as educated and polite as you.
> he is on dialysis.
>
> his family has fuck all to do with it.
Thats funny. From what I've heard the Bushes and Bin Ladens are very
chummy.
>
> hardly a saudi cave man. one of the richest men in the middle east.
> of course he had help stateside. they were al quaeda islamists.
You are talking about that group of losers who couldn't even fly a Cessna
4-seater properly and are supposed to have piloted jumbo jets with such
precision?
> now fuck off back to your 'spiracy groups with your decades old
> "ground breaking news"
I read an post to alt.conspiracy. This thread is cross-posted to several
groups.
Have a nice day.
The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan began on 27 December 1979, so
I think you probably mean the Eighties.
ljd
<snicker>
The inescapable conclusion is, naturally, unpopular, and not just in
America. It really is indecent to talk about it - drawing attention to the
weakness of the public, that they could be treated so badly by their
rulers - and it will generally be taken as an insult to do so. So I know
what an act of social gracelessness it is to be putting together lists of
information, with sources and links even, for this kind of purpose, and how
badly it is likely to be received. I shudder to think what kind of person I
am. C.L.
bwahahahhhahhhahahhahahhhhahhaha
what a cunt.
> Less movement than if
> hit by a gale force wind which they were built to withstand.
bwahahahahahahhahahhahhahahahahahh
what a cunt.
> Then theres the problem of how a hydrocarbon fire could produce enough heat
> to melt steel beams. Then theres the problem of WTC-7. The list goes on and
> on.
bwahahhahahahhahahhahhahhahhahhahhah
what a cunt.
> I won't stoop to name calling as so many here do. You are merely
> uneducated.
and you are cunt. cunt.
nope ironic. and fuck hole in the two word sense.
> >
> > its a well known fact that Bin Laden was funded by the CIA, during the
> > Afghan war with the Soviets. no news there then.. its been known
> > since the seventies.
>
> I just said that. but there are new people who come into the groups who are
> not as educated and polite as you.
well take your pathetic loon theories out of ADA, this theory was
debunked over two years ago, and several times since. if there are
new people to this moronic escapade of theory then they are even more
behind the power curve than you are and deserve to hear a cunt called
a cunt.
my courtesy extends to those grounded in reality.
now fuck off cunt.
>
> > he is on dialysis.
> >
> > his family has fuck all to do with it.
>
> Thats funny. From what I've heard the Bushes and Bin Ladens are very
> chummy.
yeah they have tea every wednesday, cucumber sandwiches too.
> >
> > hardly a saudi cave man. one of the richest men in the middle east.
> > of course he had help stateside. they were al quaeda islamists.
>
> You are talking about that group of losers who couldn't even fly a Cessna
> 4-seater properly and are supposed to have piloted jumbo jets with such
> precision?
you know fuck all about flying an aircraft so save your pathetic
speculation for other idiots that who are equally as clueless as you.
know what an INS is ?
they wern't jumbo jets you fucking ignoramus.
ever flown an aircraft?
nope ? then fuck off and save your crap for your houseplants.
cunt.
>
> > now fuck off back to your 'spiracy groups with your decades old
> > "ground breaking news"
>
> I read an post to alt.conspiracy. This thread is cross-posted to several
> groups.
well take fuck off back there, as you dont want to listen, learn or
educate yourself on aircraft. instead you all want to sit around in a
big circle jerk masturbating each other on your utter crap. you *WILL
NOT* accept anything factual that detracts from your craphouse
theories.
you have a choice. fuck off back to never never land and live in
complete fucking ignorance, or stick around in ADA and have a
formative discussion with those active in the aviation industry who
can educate you on the dynamics of aircraft (Tarver Excluded).
one choice will indicate your willingness to remain a clueless cunt
and continue with your little cirle jerk. the other you may actually
learn something.
of course we all know what the ultimate choice will be dont we. the
very reason why ADA has very little patiance for clueless cunts
banging on about conspiracy theories.
>
> Have a nice day.
you too in neverland.
You obviously have mental problems and a fixation with female genetalia.
You get in the killfile box! NOW!
plonk!!!
--
> aabbcc_running...@hotmail.com (running with scissors) obeyed
> the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics and wrote in
> news:d0fe9d08.04030...@posting.google.com:
>
> You obviously have mental problems and a fixation with female
genetalia.
> You get in the killfile box! NOW!
> plonk!!!
Heh. We *must* be the same person. I plonked him around the same time.
--
> Ultimate Heat Death <R...@kidding.com> wrote in news:Xns94A090BF6D026None@
> 216.168.3.44:
>
>> aabbcc_running...@hotmail.com (running with scissors) obeyed
>> the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics and wrote in
>> news:d0fe9d08.04030...@posting.google.com:
>>
>> You obviously have mental problems and a fixation with female
> genetalia.
>> You get in the killfile box! NOW!
>> plonk!!!
>
> Heh. We *must* be the same person. I plonked him around the same time.
A quantum uviverse. Thats my only explanation. Maybe you *are* me in a
different dimension!
Lets test this.
Are you:
1. Apolitical. IOW you don't care which political party runs the US down
the globalist turnpike to ruin.
2. A misogynist. You don't really like people, because its not just that
*mean* people suck, but that *most* people suck.
3. A believer. You see all the evil in the world, but hold out hope for a
better tomorrow after the smoke clears.
If you answered yes to any of the above, perhaps you ARE me.
--
Regards, UHD(anxiously waiting to possibly hear from myself)
> Don Dirk of Dowdawee <sp...@snuhco.com> obeyed the 2nd Law of
> Thermodynamics and wrote in
> news:Xns94A0A075AED...@216.168.3.44:
>
>> Ultimate Heat Death <R...@kidding.com> wrote in
>> news:Xns94A090BF6D026None@ 216.168.3.44:
>>
>>> aabbcc_running...@hotmail.com (running with scissors)
>>> obeyed the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics and wrote in
>>> news:d0fe9d08.04030...@posting.google.com:
>>>
>>> You obviously have mental problems and a fixation with female
>> genetalia.
>>> You get in the killfile box! NOW!
>>> plonk!!!
>>
>> Heh. We *must* be the same person. I plonked him around the same
>> time.
>
> A quantum uviverse. Thats my only explanation. Maybe you *are* me in a
> different dimension!
>
> Lets test this.
>
> Are you:
>
> 1. Apolitical. IOW you don't care which political party runs the US
> down the globalist turnpike to ruin.
As long as I gets mine.
> 2. A misogynist. You don't really like people, because its not just
> that *mean* people suck, but that *most* people suck.
And *they* can suck. It's their one saving grace.
> 3. A believer. You see all the evil in the world, but hold out hope
> for a better tomorrow after the smoke clears.
Yes. But I pray this smoke around here never clears.
> If you answered yes to any of the above, perhaps you ARE me.
I think that is now firmly established.
if i had stated the 80's someone would say it happened in the 70's
Too bad hundreds of fire-fighters died that day.
Too bad that over the course of the next several months, an assortment
people across the USA were removed from circulation by anthrax
terrorism.
Wonder if all the right people were in those buildings at the time
they collapsed.
It all boils down to: If you see acts of terrorism being committed,
count on someone coming to your rescue for a fee. Just bend over and
say "Yes sir, thank you sir, will you be taking my daughter now, sir?"
> My personal favorite is the movie clips of the tower
> collapsing, where you can just make out the demo charges
> going off. Also, the building-7 collapse was a
> well-executed demolition; straight down without injuring
> any other buildings. Nicely done, whoever did it. Lots of
> cameras on that one.
>
> Too bad hundreds of fire-fighters died that day.
Have you noticed that this fucking idiotic bullshit isn't
playing as well this time as it did the other dozen times some
stupid asshole brought it up? I hope you understand that this
doesn't mean it isn't one of the lamest and silliest conspiracy
stories ever contrived. It just got boring after being laughed
out of newsgroups so often. I feel sorry for those poor
bastards who made those elaborate websites with this mindless
horseshit and figured to make a career of it.
bwahahahahahhahahhahhahhahahhahahhahahhahah
yet another 'spiracy cunt.
> "AngleWyrm" <no_spam_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> My personal favorite is the movie clips of the tower
>> collapsing, where you can just make out the demo charges
>> going off. Also, the building-7 collapse was a
>> well-executed demolition; straight down without injuring
>> any other buildings. Nicely done, whoever did it. Lots of
>> cameras on that one.
>>
>> Too bad hundreds of fire-fighters died that day.
>
> Have you noticed that this fucking idiotic bullshit isn't
> playing as well this time as it did the other dozen times some
> stupid asshole brought it up? I hope you understand that this
> doesn't mean it isn't one of the lamest and silliest conspiracy
> stories ever contrived. It just got boring after being laughed
> out of newsgroups so often. I feel sorry for those poor
> bastards who made those elaborate websites with this mindless
> horseshit and figured to make a career of it.
>
The same three gasbag apologist whiners are here as before. But a lot more
people support the conspiratorial view now.
And your experience in building demolition is?
tim gueguen 101867
Greater than or equal to yours.
> tim gueguen 101867
I'm not asking you. We know your knowledge is lacking.
tim gueguen 101867
mmm and lot of people believe the holocaust didnt happen, that the world is flat.
you dont have a monopoly on fucking ignorance you stupid cunt.
The human race is in decline... that must be the same group of
people who believe in the tooth fairy and who think "The Hobbit"
is a true story.
> you dont have a monopoly on fucking ignorance you stupid
> cunt.
<snicker> It's really too bad you aren't bright enough to
appreciate things like that.
Step Three: Profit wrote:
> John Griffin <thathi...@yahooie.com> wrote in
> news:Xns94A11D8801222th...@130.133.1.4:
>
> > Have you noticed that this fucking idiotic bullshit isn't
> > playing as well this time as it did the other dozen times some
> > stupid asshole brought it up? I hope you understand that this
> > doesn't mean it isn't one of the lamest and silliest conspiracy
> > stories ever contrived. It just got boring after being laughed
> > out of newsgroups so often. I feel sorry for those poor
> > bastards who made those elaborate websites with this mindless
> > horseshit and figured to make a career of it.
> >
>
> The same three gasbag apologist whiners are here as before. But a lot more
> people support the conspiratorial view now.
You mean it's over a couple of dozen now ?
P.B.
> >
> > The same three gasbag apologist whiners are here as before. But a lot
more
> > people support the conspiratorial view now.
>
>
> mmm and lot of people believe the holocaust didnt happen, that the world
is flat.
Huh, many people believe the FEMA report on WTC 7 is conclusive also.
>
> you dont have a monopoly on fucking ignorance you stupid cunt.
Maybe the flag isn't as tightly wrapped on his noggin as originally thought.
fucking lying cunt.
That's "he", bonehead. Lick me.
So I ass-ume there's a video for this finely tuned jumble of
gobbledygook, yes? Because I don't believe anything that I don't see
in an 8-second video clip...Preferrably with a TV logo in the corner.
oh i appreciate your ignorance alright. its fucking hysterical.
now fuck off back to neverland you ignorant cunt.
bwahahaahhahhaha
fucking ignorant cunt.
this is true comedy.
no wonder the world is in such a shit state with fucking morons like
this allowed out in public unsupervised.
> John Griffin <thathi...@yahooie.com> wrote
>> An amazingly lame and stupid entity calling itself running
>> with scissors wrote:
>>
>> > you dont have a monopoly on fucking ignorance you stupid
>> > cunt.
>>
>> <snicker> It's really too bad you aren't bright enough to
>> appreciate things like that.
>
>
> oh i appreciate your ignorance alright. its fucking
> hysterical.
No, really, you have no idea what was so funny about your
fucking ignorant remark. Ask someone to explain the concept
called "irony."
> now fuck off back to neverland you ignorant cunt.
Very weak tantrum, mental dwarf. You're a complete failure.
Here's a fish for your performance...now say "you ignorant cunt"
again. Cretin.
Your bureaucratic world which you believe reports all and holds all
accountable is neverland.
Fucking half O'fag flaghead.
You really hate defending your bureaucratic world where everything is
reported on and all are held accountable don't you? <snicker>
stupid cunt.
Is that why I can trump you in any aspect of this discussion, and you offer
nothing but limp-wristed girl slaps in return?
> The obligatory gay lame! Bravooooohhhhh!
>
> Jerry
>
>
Can you better describe his ineffectualness?
bwahahahhahahahha
fucking stupid prick.
hows that
bwahahahahahhahh so way off the mark its hysterical. like everything you say
ignorant cunt.
> Fucking half O'fag flaghead.
'nuff said, ignorant cunt.
ignorant clueless cunt
stupid cunt.
> On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 00:05:59 -0000, Captain Pissy <piss.right@off>
> Admirable job of throttling your scrawny neck, is how I personally
would
> describe it. Of course, you appear to be numb from the sternum north,
> so...
>
> Jerry
>
>
So when are you two getting married?
> John Griffin <thathi...@yahooie.com> wrote
>> Now several hours more stupid, the imbecile calling itself
>> running with scissors) wrote:
>>
>> > John Griffin <thathi...@yahooie.com> wrote
>>
>> >> An amazingly lame and stupid entity calling itself
>> >> running with scissors wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > you dont have a monopoly on fucking ignorance you
>> >> > stupid cunt.
>> >>
>> >> <snicker> It's really too bad you aren't bright enough
>> >> to appreciate things like that.
>> >
>> >
>> > oh i appreciate your ignorance alright. its fucking
>> > hysterical.
>>
>> No, really, you have no idea what was so funny about your
>> fucking ignorant remark. Ask someone to explain the
>> concept called "irony."
>>
>> > now fuck off back to neverland you ignorant cunt.
>>
>> Very weak tantrum, mental dwarf. You're a complete
>> failure.
>>
>> Here's a fish for your performance...now say "you ignorant
>> cunt" again. Cretin.
>
>
> bwahahahhahahahha
>
> fucking stupid prick.
>
> hows that
It shows that you can't follow instructions. What a surprise.
Seriously, why do you do this to yourself?
> John Griffin <thathi...@yahooie.com> wrote
>> Now several hours more stupid, the imbecile calling itself
>> running with scissors) wrote:
>>
>> > John Griffin <thathi...@yahooie.com> wrote
>>
>> >> An amazingly lame and stupid entity calling itself
>> >> running with scissors wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > you dont have a monopoly on fucking ignorance you
>> >> > stupid cunt.
>> >>
>> >> <snicker> It's really too bad you aren't bright enough
>> >> to appreciate things like that.
>> >
>> >
>> > oh i appreciate your ignorance alright. its fucking
>> > hysterical.
>>
>> No, really, you have no idea what was so funny about your
>> fucking ignorant remark. Ask someone to explain the
>> concept called "irony."
>>
>> > now fuck off back to neverland you ignorant cunt.
>>
>> Very weak tantrum, mental dwarf. You're a complete
>> failure.
>>
>> Here's a fish for your performance...now say "you ignorant
>> cunt" again. Cretin.
>
> stupid cunt.
<snicker> The poor little guy tried twice and failed both
times.
I'm sorry, but even if I found such insults a turn on I have would have no
interest in dating you, being both straight and someone who finds trolls of
your nature dull and uncreative. Your attempts at a come on would be better
spent on someone else.
tim gueguen 101867
As long as you don't have to discuss 9/11, eh?
It's a leg up from Jerry Springer.
stupid cunt.
really? when ? stupid cunt.
> John Griffin <thathi...@yahooie.com> wrote
I'm betting that you can finish memorizing that within another
five or six repetitions, unless you fuck it up again and have to
start over.
did you think that up all by your little self or did you use your
'spiracy therory support group for help.
stupid cunt.
Ignoring of course, the fact that debris DID hit it and it burned for
several hours. (Also, it was of the same design as the Towers and
would be subject to the same defect if the supports were left to burn
for that length of time.)
As far as the NYFD and Larry Silverstein, it's been explained several
times on this NG that "pulled" means pulling firefighter support out
of the building because it's in danger of collapse, you would have to
show me that the NYFD has ever used "pulled" to mean "pulling the
building down."
I think the "irony" that you are missing is that you display your
ignorance in an attempt to insult someone else on their perceived
ignorance. It is actually funny, you never argue, you never debate the
issues or the answers given, you just wallow in the word "cunt" as if
it were some sort of magic phrase that silences your enemies.
I'm beginning to believe you think the planes hit the Towers and
caused the collapse. Well and good, on that we agree. But you might
want to consider using other keys on your keyboard once in awhile to
make your points.
I'm beginning to believe that he is describing an internal issue.
DDD has no understanding of fire issues & their effects re WTC buildings 1,
2, & 7 or the Pentagon. This individual refused to accept the multiple
complicating issues associated with containing, controlling, & extinguishing
a fire under the "Slate Built Up Composition Roof Deck System" on the
Pentagon after a through explanation.
This individual has also refused to accept the engineering reports for the
Pentagon & WTC 7 as being valid unbiased studies of the performance of these
structures under the conditions imposed by the 09/11/01 incidents.
The individual currently posting using the DDD sock has been posting in the
above described number under any number of "Socks" since shortly after
09/11/01. Many of the ADA regulars now ignore his senseless, stupid,
illogical, insulting posts/responses other than to refer to He/She/It in
less than flattering terms.
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type
Posting From ADA
stupid cunt.
well seeing as you are too fucking dumb to read the history. this
theory has been discussed in depth several times over the past two
years at least. the latest batch of spiracy theorists, like others
use fiction as the basis of aircraft operation, dynamics and so forth.
nothing is acceptable unless it can be encompassed in the 'spiracy
theory. any basis of fact is disregarded and those stating the facts
are called government shills, republicans, democrats, jew lovers, and
whole string of pathetic nonsense, including flagheads for crapping on
the theories and statements that are utter fiction and fantasy.
nit only myself and others have discussed and set forth, and attempted
to educate some these people on avaition matters. the answers are in
the threads, if you cant be bothered to read it, if you are too
fucking stupid to look it up, if you dont accept the FACTS then you
are a stupid cunt.
stupid cunt.
did that two years ago, and a couple of times since as plenty of
others have. its all in the ADA archives.
stupid cunt.
the irony is that you are missing the point.
> the irony is that you are missing the point.
<snicker> This pathetic little bastard is going to say
something like "I'm a troll. I'm so clever. I say 'stupid cunt'
and people laugh at me, just as I planned...and I call that a
'point.'"
If you can't find out what the word "point" means by this time
tomorrow, kill yourself.
no, really! you are a stupid cunt.
seeing as you are too fucking dumb, let me cut and paste one of the
previous posts :
QUOTE
well seeing as you are too fucking dumb to read the history. this
theory has been discussed in depth several times over the past two
years at least. the latest batch of spiracy theorists, like others
use fiction as the basis of aircraft operation, dynamics and so forth.
nothing is acceptable unless it can be encompassed in the 'spiracy
theory. any basis of fact is disregarded and those stating the facts
are called government shills, republicans, democrats, jew lovers, and
whole string of pathetic nonsense, including flagheads for crapping on
the theories and statements that are utter fiction and fantasy.
not only myself and others have discussed and set forth, and attempted
to educate some these people on avaition matters. the answers are in
the threads, if you cant be bothered to read it, if you are too
fucking stupid to look it up, if you dont accept the FACTS then you
are a stupid cunt.
ENDQUOTE
perhaps YOU should figure out *point* you stupid cunt. do the world a
favour and sit in your car in the garage with the engine running. one
would hope your genes havnt entered the gene pool.
<snicker> The poor little bastard decided to abandon his
pretense of being capable of being a troll, so he gave us a
sputtering little tantrum instead.
Little cretin, the shit you quoted had nothing to do with the
established fact that you're dumber than a horsebiscuit, but at
least it was incoherent. The fact that you think "stupid cunt"
is the point of it is the funniest part.
"uh, I know I'm gonna get rapped in the mouth for this but..."
What are the ADA archives?
whooosh
stupid cunt.
Maybe, why don't you try to explain the point instead of assuming that
everyone on this thread already knows what you've posted. (And don't
tell me to do a Google search! I've no desire to wade through multiple
"stupid cunt" responses to find something worthwhile.)
ADA is the group that this is being posted to, Alt.Disasters.Aviation
there are plenty of people in ADA who are extremely expereinced and
knowledgeable on aviation matters, some fruitcakes too, but that is
not difficult to determine. over past 2+ years the incidents that
occurred on on 9/11 have been discussed many a time. often some berk,
like dick eastman bounces into ADA spouting utter garbage about
aircraft and aviation that has the readers rolling the aisles. the
subsequent indignance of the claimer is even funnier.
basically, the point is this. when it comes to making statements
about aircraft, about aircraft operations and so on there are people
reading who have spent many hour in a day to day capacity involved in
exacxtly these functions. so when some poxy conspiracy theorist comes
bounding through the doors, spouting about aircraft operations and
aircraft dynamics they will recieve about an equivalent reception like
pack of dogs and a three legged cat.
you are welcome to join the discussions in ADA we welcome anyone,
though as a word of advice before you hit the key to post. think
about what you are asking. hissy fits about hijackers and transponder
codes, mystery planes circling and diving over the pentagon etc etc.
will recieve a suitable reaction. stupid statements will get a nasty
response. like i say, if you want to learn about aircraft and
aviation, people there are keen to share their knowledge.
i congratulate you on your insterest and posing a question in ADA like
that will elicit an educational response.
if you have an interest in ADA these will help, by the way grab a
coffee first:
ADA FAQ's
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~philmil/ADA_FAQ/ADA_FAQ.htm
http://www.blippie.org.uk/faq.htm
http://home.att.net/~j.knoyle/the_tarver_chronicles.html
these guys have done a stirling job in these FAQ's and the archives
can be found at deja.com
Yeah, I know...you're a troll and you think you have a point.
<snicker> What a fucking idiot.
By the way, you failed to find the meaning of "point," so it's
time to kill yourself. Do it now.
its not what "I" have posted, its what has been posted previously. its
the same names who crop up again and again spouting their little
'spiracy theories. in the past not just myself but other have
provided proffessional input and technical advice. we have had the
claiming that aircraft were fitted with remote control devices in
secret. that the lamp posts in front of the pentagon would have
stopped flt 77 hitting the building, it was the jews, the planes were
flown to a secret location where the passengers were killed and the
body parts thrown in the pentagon wreckage. we have had 'spiracy
theorists try and educate professional pilots on how to fly a plane.
how transponders work and so on and so on.
like you, i have no desire to wade through reams of garbage, i have
neither the time also. if you do an ADA search on "transponder",
"77", or any other host of subject matter, and go back to to 2001,
2002 and 2003 vintage there is enough there that has dealt with these
fantastical claims. ok, once, its fair to discuss these points. the
second time, fair enough. the third time it starts to get irritating,
the fourth, fifth and sixth time......
the funny thing is is that it is the same people coming back and
making these claims and statements every three or four months or so.
these characters bounce into ADA spounting utter garbage, claiming
fiction as fact for aircraft operation dynamics and so on, and they
are making these statements. claiming how aircraft fly and work and
the dynamics of, to, for example commercial pilots and mechanics.
because those who *DO* have a greater knowledge of these subjects dont
drop everything and say to the claimants of these theories "wow! man!
you are so intelligent. you are a prophet! we bow down to your
theory!", instead calling them on it, the response is typical.
when a 'spiracy theorist tries to tell a commercial pilot that a
boeing can be stoppe by a lamp post, that aircraft can be taken over
with secretly installed remote control devices, involving cockpit
cameras etc etc. a total fictional account of how a transpoder works
and the functioning of, let alone an INS, FMC or ADC. the response
will not be pleasant.
i must admit i am not the origniator of the "SC" response. that honor
goes to BtB in response to LadyPilot, who is equally deserving of the
response. however, as mentioned above, these issues have been
addressed three, four, five, six times previously. i, myself enjoy
entering into learned discussion. however, reiterating the same facts
to the same people time and time again is only worthy of one response.
these people will never "get it" they refuse to accept fact, they
prefer to revel in fiction and fantasy, distorted facts and figures.
levelled discussion is perfectly attainable, and seeing as you have
asked a question, i have elected to provide a response, and you will
agree that it is a word or two longer than a 2 word response.
the difference is this: if a post is made by someone truly inquisitive
with a specific question. it will elicit a response. you will note
that in a recent thread, a question was made regarding prop reverse,
and the post recieved suitable response.
asking "is it possible that a commercial aircraft could be fitted with
a system to externally override pilot control, if so how? and if not
why?" an informed response would be made.
by posting that "the aircraft were taken over by remote control" and
categorically stating this as fact despite the responses, and claiming
that everyone who disagrees is a government shill, part of the
conspiracy, a jew lover, holohugger, a flag head or whatever only gets
what he deserves. indeed some of the discussions evolved into
holocaust denial by the 'spiracy theorist.
no one expects a new poster to ADA to be privvy to the history of ADA,
but the reality is, there is no short resolve to this. the regs in ADA
know the other regs and the occaisional visitor *will not get it*
lurking, reading the FAQ's or the archives should give a little
grounding into the history, but as i said, seeing as you asked a
question, i can take the time to provide a formative response.
LENSMAN WROTE FOR GOOD REASON
> > > > I'm beginning to believe you think the planes hit the Towers and
> > > > caused the collapse. Well and good, on that we agree. But you might
> > > > want to consider using other keys on your keyboard once in awhile to
> > > > make your points.
> > >
> > >
> > > did that two years ago, and a couple of times since as plenty of
> > > others have. its all in the ADA archives.
> >
> > "uh, I know I'm gonna get rapped in the mouth for this but..."
> > What are the ADA archives?
>
> ADA is the group that this is being posted to, Alt.Disasters.Aviation
> there are plenty of people in ADA who are extremely expereinced and
> knowledgeable on aviation matters, some fruitcakes too, but that is
> not difficult to determine. over past 2+ years the incidents that
> occurred on on 9/11 have been discussed many a time. often some berk,
> like dick eastman bounces into ADA spouting utter garbage about
> aircraft and aviation that has the readers rolling the aisles. the
> subsequent indignance of the claimer is even funnier.
The official 9/11 story is just as convoluted and filled with lunacy as the
others, half a fag flaghead.
>
> basically, the point is this. when it comes to making statements
> about aircraft, about aircraft operations and so on there are people
> reading who have spent many hour in a day to day capacity involved in
> exacxtly these functions.
And others whom were actually involved that day and have been silenced from
speaking, half O'fag flaghead.
> bounding through the doors, spouting about aircraft operations and
> aircraft dynamics they will recieve about an equivalent reception like
> pack of dogs and a three legged cat.
Huh, you welcome all kind of loons over there yet...
>
> you are welcome to join the discussions in ADA we welcome anyone,
<snicker> they're better than those loons at A.C. Just ask Bertie or stupid
cunt man.
> though as a word of advice before you hit the key to post. think
> about what you are asking. hissy fits about hijackers and transponder
> codes, mystery planes circling and diving over the pentagon etc etc.
> will recieve a suitable reaction. stupid statements will get a nasty
> response. like i say, if you want to learn about aircraft and
> aviation, people there are keen to share their knowledge.
And they really know about 9/11 too.
>
> i congratulate you on your insterest and posing a question in ADA like
> that will elicit an educational response.
>
> if you have an interest in ADA these will help, by the way grab a
> coffee first:
stupid cunt.
perfect response for a stupid cunt.
> By the way, you failed to find the meaning of "point," so it's
> time to kill yourself. Do it now.
see above, stupid cunt.
Ask me why I made you say that.
its simple. you are a stupid cunt.
stupid cunt.
>
>
> >
> > basically, the point is this. when it comes to making statements
> > about aircraft, about aircraft operations and so on there are people
> > reading who have spent many hour in a day to day capacity involved in
> > exacxtly these functions.
>
>
> And others whom were actually involved that day and have been silenced from
> speaking, half O'fag flaghead.
stupid cunt.
>
>
> > bounding through the doors, spouting about aircraft operations and
> > aircraft dynamics they will recieve about an equivalent reception like
> > pack of dogs and a three legged cat.
>
> Huh, you welcome all kind of loons over there yet...
stupid cunt.
>
>
> >
> > you are welcome to join the discussions in ADA we welcome anyone,
>
> <snicker> they're better than those loons at A.C. Just ask Bertie or stupid
> cunt man.
stupid cunt.
>
>
> > though as a word of advice before you hit the key to post. think
> > about what you are asking. hissy fits about hijackers and transponder
> > codes, mystery planes circling and diving over the pentagon etc etc.
> > will recieve a suitable reaction. stupid statements will get a nasty
> > response. like i say, if you want to learn about aircraft and
> > aviation, people there are keen to share their knowledge.
>
> And they really know about 9/11 too.
stupid cunt
>
>
> >
> > i congratulate you on your insterest and posing a question in ADA like
> > that will elicit an educational response.
> >
> > if you have an interest in ADA these will help, by the way grab a
> > coffee first:
>
> stupid cunt.
stupid cunt.
<stuff snipped for brevity>
OK, running, I see where you're response is coming from now. I [have]
read the "remote control" theories, the idea that the Boeing couldn't
have hit the Pentagon because the wings didn't leave holes (that's a
favorite of mine) and the idea that someone leaked the whole plan as a
synopsis for the pilot of "The Lone Gunman." Nothing changes. It's
exactly the same way with the Moon hoax theories and Ed "somebody" who
insists that man is older than coal because fossils were found
[between] two coal beds. (I've tried explaining to him that the "two"
coal beds are probably ONE coal bed folded over, he ignores me.)
I hear your frustration, but "stupid cunt" doesn't help the argument
and really makes you look stupid!
I've never been on alt.disasters.aviation... I've been reading this
thread on alt.conspiracy (always good for a major laugh)!
and you wonder why you have been laughed out of the aviation groups so many times.
stupid cunt.
warum so vage
> John Griffin <thathi...@yahooie.com> wrote
>> aabbcc_running...@hotmail.com (running with
>> scissors) wrote:
>>
>> > John Griffin <thathi...@yahooie.com> wrote
>> >> aabbcc_running...@hotmail.com (running with
>> >> scissors) wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > John Griffin <thathi...@yahooie.com> wrote
That's the sort of imbecilic wild guess that would be expected
from a simple, stupid cunt. I suspect that by now there are very
few readers of these newsgroups who think you're anything more
than that, and even then it's only because they haven't read two
or more of your childish little squeals.
I saw your hysterical and barely coherent attempt to justify
yourself. You are a fucking idiot. Apparently you're bothered
by typical, everyday newsgroup traffic, i.e., you don't meet the
minimum standards required to engage in meaningless bickering.
(I noticed that you're so fucking stupid that you don't
understand that all of these articles are appearing in several
newsgroups.)
You seemed to be saying that it's up to you to chase away those
fucking idiots who don't understand the obvious fact that
Mohammed's Zombie Army conspired to snag some airplanes and
crash them into buildings, and that that burden is the thing
that made you the beaten down little laughingstock you are
today. The most amusing part was that you think you're among
the best qualified to kick those stupid bastards' asses. Be
assured, little harlequin, that you can comfortably retire from
your Mission From God in the assurance that there are literally
thousands of people who can do a far better job than you do at
engaging the fools who think the 9/11 crashes were a U.S.
government conspiracy. You're way to hysterical and way to
dense. They'd end up kicking your ass and causing you to squeal
like a hog being castrated. Also, note that even if your
questionable "help" were required, you still have the option of
shying away from any newsgroup article or thread that causes you
to make such a humiliating display of yourself, you fucking
idiotic little moron.
It's really too bad you raved about the newsgroup where you've
been reading this stuff. I just hope your childish display
doesn't cause people to think the adults there are anything like
you, and I hope they don't let you embarrass them.
Try to get a job.
not half ! you should see some the discussions that go on over here.
the FAQ's should give an insight into the hilarity. you should stop
by some time and enjoy.
thanks for the response. what i should point out is that "SC" is not
an indication of fustration, i really dont care what these people
think, they will not accept any fact, even if drummed in with a 2x4.
it is purely dismissive. i dont care what they say, what they think,
what their opinions are. they are profoundly stupid and irrelevant to
anything but their little circle jerk buddies, who want to sit around
and jerk off to ever wilder theories. the fact is who is more stupid.
the moron or the person who tries to argue with a moron. as we all
understand, these people will not accept fact. they prefer instead to
base their views and opinions and politics on fiction and fantasy.
its no small wonder why a lot of the berks in political power are in
that offcie of political power. these people instead to prefer brand
everyone who does not correspond with their views as flagheads,
holohuggers, jew lovers.. whatever. these people eventually highlight
underscore and capitalize their ignorance and stupidity. but they
cant see it. again, they wont accept it.
as you understand, when these idiots, bounce into a group that does
have professional people who are there to discuss actual matters from
a professional standpoint, the desire to entertain thier fantasy
worlds is pretty much limited. its always the same old names
expounding their crap theories, refusing to accept any fact and
claiming victory in a resounding defeat. sometimes they change their
alias but the sig line and mental defect remains.
"SC" is therefore a dismissive term that has been earned by those
recieving the response. there is no discussion. there never will be
any discussion. why bother argue with a moron. it is simply an
indicator of what these people are. the mentality is not unlike those
who cut you off on the freeway and flip you off for it, or the
mentality that tries to sue a gun maker because their six year old
found a gun in the house blew their sibling away.
CSNY 4 Way ST...
they are profoundly stupid and irrelevant to
> anything but their little circle jerk buddies, who want to sit around
> and jerk off to ever wilder theories.
That would be you and the 9/11 coincidence theary, half a fag flaghead...
the fact is who is more stupid.
Multiple choice?
> the moron or the person who tries to argue with a moron. as we all
> understand, these people will not accept fact.
What fact...the 9/11 fairytale is just that...
they prefer instead to
> base their views and opinions and politics on fiction and fantasy.
that would be your ilk, flaghead...
> its no small wonder why a lot of the berks in political power are in
> that offcie of political power. these people instead to prefer brand
> everyone who does not correspond with their views as flagheads,
True...so true.
> holohuggers, jew lovers.. whatever. these people eventually highlight
> underscore and capitalize their ignorance and stupidity. but they
> cant see it. again, they wont accept it
Painting with a very wide brush, eh...
>
> as you understand, when these idiots, bounce into a group that does
> have professional people who are there to discuss actual matters from
> a professional standpoint, the desire to entertain thier fantasy
> worlds is pretty much limited.
I see, ada has solved the complete failure on 9/11... what an cocksucker you
are...
its always the same old names
> expounding their crap theories, refusing to accept any fact and
> claiming victory in a resounding defeat.
<snicker>
fact, huh...flaghead could be beaten to death with a fact and he wins...
sometimes they change their
> alias but the sig line and mental defect remains.
i.e. stupid cunt...
>
> "SC" is therefore a dismissive term that has been earned by those
> recieving the response. there is no discussion.
bwahahahahah, pussy...flaghead doesn't want discussion.
there never will be
> any discussion.
yes this is true.. i.e. stupid cunt..you see I won that lack of debate...
why bother argue with a moron.
You have never argued aany facts surrounding the 9/11 fairytale...
it is simply an
> indicator of what these people are.
patriots fighting the lobotomized flagheads...
the mentality is not unlike those
> who cut you off on the freeway and flip you off for it,
or the ones that do the same only to shriek stupid cunt...
or the
> mentality that tries to sue a gun maker because their six year old
> found a gun in the house blew their sibling away.
or not...flaghead
I'll see.