9/11?
The User Name That Says BAD_MOTHERFUCKER On It
news:dontemailme-13...@cs666878-71.austin.rr.com:
> In article <20030712132013...@mb-m05.aol.com>,
> miken...@aol.commonjunk (Big Mike) wrote:
>
>> >No credible evidence that a 757 hit the Pentagon, for that matter.
>>
>> That's something I wonderred about. I mean that morning on tv when
>> they showed the Pentagon on tv there didn't seem to be any large
>> pieces of wing or fuselage. Now I know the pentagon is a big
>> building, but it seems like something would have broken off of the
>> plane into the grass outside.
The small hole it made couldn't encompass an entire 757. The hole was 10-
12 feet across, and much of the other damage was the facade.
Doesn't anyone ever wonder why there are so few photos of these events?
Plus, that video of the Pentagon is a sad joke. There's your proof of
conspiracy, right there. What morons.
>
> Not if it nose-dived straight down.
>
Most of all if it had nose-dived straight down. Do you even think before
you post? Furthermore, it didn't. It did a fairly impossible manouver,
behaving more like a small fighter jet.
It went from an overpass height to ground level in seconds. 757s can't do
that.
>>
>> Big Mike
>> "Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of
>> chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course
>> others may take, but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death!"
>> -Patrick Henry
--
Can I borrow a feeling?
http://www.mp3.com/gortician
Bass for your anus:
http://www.mp3.com/manticore
http://www.mp3.com/meterversusyard
http://www.mp3.com/highc
http://www.mp3.com/measurerecs.
"[The artwork of Andrew Penland] is REAL...what I mean by "real" is that
it made NEW THOUGHTS occur in my head, which would have never otherwise
occurred." --Full Force Frank
Rich Ahrens
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:22:21 GMT, "The User Name That Says
> BAD_MOTHERFUCKER On It" <spamsp...@spam.spam> wrote in
> alt.disasters.aviation:
>
>
>>donte...@thisaddress.com ([OverTiME]) wrote in
>>news:dontemailme-13...@cs666878-71.austin.rr.com:
>>
>>
>>>In article <20030712132013...@mb-m05.aol.com>,
>>>miken...@aol.commonjunk (Big Mike) wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>No credible evidence that a 757 hit the Pentagon, for that matter.
>>>>
>>>>That's something I wonderred about. I mean that morning on tv when
>>>>they showed the Pentagon on tv there didn't seem to be any large
>>>>pieces of wing or fuselage. Now I know the pentagon is a big
>>>>building, but it seems like something would have broken off of the
>>>>plane into the grass outside.
>>
>>
>>The small hole it made couldn't encompass an entire 757. The hole was 10-
>>12 feet across, and much of the other damage was the facade.
>>
>>
>>Doesn't anyone ever wonder why there are so few photos of these events?
>>Plus, that video of the Pentagon is a sad joke. There's your proof of
>>conspiracy, right there. What morons.
>>
>>
>>>Not if it nose-dived straight down.
>>>
>>
>>Most of all if it had nose-dived straight down. Do you even think before
>>you post? Furthermore, it didn't. It did a fairly impossible manouver,
>>behaving more like a small fighter jet.
>>
>>It went from an overpass height to ground level in seconds. 757s can't do
>>that.
>
>
No, that would be his drivers license.
The User Name That Says BAD_MOTHERFUCKER On It
news:f4c5hvcaiuncsusiv...@4ax.com:
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:22:21 GMT, "The User Name That Says
> BAD_MOTHERFUCKER On It" <spamsp...@spam.spam> wrote in
> alt.disasters.aviation:
>
>>donte...@thisaddress.com ([OverTiME]) wrote in
>>news:dontemailme-13...@cs666878-71.austin.rr.com:
>>
>>> In article <20030712132013...@mb-m05.aol.com>,
>>> miken...@aol.commonjunk (Big Mike) wrote:
>>>
>>>> >No credible evidence that a 757 hit the Pentagon, for that matter.
>>>>
>>>> That's something I wonderred about. I mean that morning on tv when
>>>> they showed the Pentagon on tv there didn't seem to be any large
>>>> pieces of wing or fuselage. Now I know the pentagon is a big
>>>> building, but it seems like something would have broken off of the
>>>> plane into the grass outside.
>>
>>
>>The small hole it made couldn't encompass an entire 757. The hole was
>>10- 12 feet across, and much of the other damage was the facade.
>>
Coward...
>>
>>Doesn't anyone ever wonder why there are so few photos of these
>>events? Plus, that video of the Pentagon is a sad joke. There's your
>>proof of conspiracy, right there. What morons.
>>
Coward...
>>>
>>> Not if it nose-dived straight down.
>>>
>>
>>Most of all if it had nose-dived straight down. Do you even think
>>before you post? Furthermore, it didn't. It did a fairly impossible
>>manouver, behaving more like a small fighter jet.
>>
>>It went from an overpass height to ground level in seconds. 757s can't
>>do that.
>
Coward...
> You sure your sign doesn't say "STUPID_MOTHERFUCKER" on it?
>
>
> Jerry
>
What a witty rejoinder!
The User Name That Says BAD_MOTHERFUCKER On It
news:3f12b63a$0$165$a186...@authen.newsreader.visi.com:
So neither of you have a leg to stand on, in other words.
Bertie the Bunyip
And you do?
Bertie
Bertie the Bunyip
They can actually.
A 757 can do anything any other aircraft can do within the bounds of it's
power to weigth ratio and that in itself is pretty considerable and not a
factor here, so you'r talking out of your ass.
>>
>
>
> Coward...
Fjuckwit.
>
>
>
>> You sure your sign doesn't say "STUPID_MOTHERFUCKER" on it?
>>
>>
>> Jerry
>>
>
> What a witty rejoinder!
So was that.
Bertie
This is 1938 Berlin
news:u5gchvc8e8gvnk4k9...@4ax.com:
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 23:50:49 GMT, This is 1938 Berlin
> <spamsp...@spam.spam> wrote:
>
>>Phil Miller <phi...@REMOVEoptusnet.com.au> wrote in
>>news:rcobhvkbk8k3tkq4t...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 21:01:13 GMT, This is 1938 Berlin
>>> <spamsp...@spam.spam> wrote:
>
>>>>If I was going to do it, I would have painted a winged cruise missile
>>of
>>>>some sort to look like an AA jet. It would get the job done, and fool
>>>>just about anyone.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/smart/bgm-109.htm
>>> BGM-109 Tomahawk
>>>
>>> Length:
>>> 18 feet 3 inches (5.56 meters); with booster: 20 feet 6 inches (6.25
>>> meters)
>>> Weight:
>>> 2,650 pounds (1192.5 kg); 3,200 pounds (1440 kg) with booster
>>> Diameter:
>>> 20.4 inches (51.81 cm)
>>> Wing Span:
>>> 8 feet 9 inches (2.67 meters)
>>>
>>> http://www.boeing.com/commercial/757family/technical.html
>>> Boeing 757-300
>>>
>>> Length:
>>> 178 feet 7 inches (54.5 meters)
>>> Weight:
>>> 272,500 pounds (123,600 kg)
>>> Width:
>>> 12 feet 4 inches (3.7 meters)
>>> Wing Span:
>>> 124 feet 10 inches (38.05 meters)
>>>
>>>
>>> Fool just about anyone!? Sure.
>>>
>>
>>Can I get one in red?
>
> You can have one in any colour you like. The hard part will be getting
> Federal Express to deliver it to the planet you are inhabiting. What
> colour is the sky there?
>
> Paint a cruise missile in airline colours to confuse eyewitnesses!?
> Bwahahaha!
>
> Phil
> --
> Reality-ometer: [\........] Humph! Thought so...
>
Phil, who thinks a security camera means still photos, is that the
biggest cruise missile in the world? How about drones? Anything else
similar to those two?
I'm not really a Jane's whore/Clancy-ite.