The Wrong Word
Joe Klein
Over at the Commentary blog, Max Boot notes
(http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/boot/178391)
that even the gung-ho U.S. special forces seem "a bit worn down and
pessimistic" in recent conversations he's had with them about the
situation in Afghanistan. I've had similar conversations with rank-and-
file members of the U.S. military recently--in part, because they're
not sure that this mission can actually be accomplished (very unusual
for our can-do military), but also because they're exhausted and
overstretched after eight years of combat, in the necessary Afghan
action and the unnecessary war of choice in Iraq.
Boot's prescription is as predictable as it is lame...
He thinks morale would improve markedly if the President uses the word
"victory" in his Afghanistan rollout next week. But "victory" is a
word that was never used by David Petraeus in Iraq--it was only used
by unsophisticated bully-raggers like John McCain--and it is a word
that would be laughable if applied to Afghanistan (just as it remains
fairly implausible when applied to Iraq). Success is a better word
than "victory," less bellicose, more in keeping with the spirit of
counter-insurgency doctrine.
Boot is on firmer ground when he suggests that morale would improve
if Obama hews to the McChrystal recommendation of 40,000 troops, but I
think a much stronger morale booster would be if the President conveys
a firm, reasonable sense of what can actually be accomplished in
Afghanistan (and the region), and why it must be accomplished--no
matter the number of troops he is sending. A plausible sense of
mission needs to be re-established...and it would be a nice morale
booster if he reinforced this message to the troops by (a) finding a
way to deliver it personally in Afghanistan for the holidays and (b)
spending either Thanksgiving or Christmas with his family at either
Fort Hood or Fort Lewis here, with the families of troops either
returning from deployments or rotating downrange.
But there is one further step the President should take. In almost
every conversation I've had with members of the military who have been
deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan, the most powerful morale buster is
the sense that they're in this all alone--that the rest of the country
expresses "support" for the troops but isn't really involved,
individually or emotionally, in the war effort. ("Thank you for your
service" is the punch line for more than a few jokes and sardonic
quips.)
If the President really wants to raise flagging morale, he can get the
rest of us involved in Afghanistan when he makes his speech next
Tuesday. He can name some charities--like Greg Mortenson's project to
build schools or Matt Damon's efforts to provide clean water (in
Africa now, but it could be expanded to Afghanistan and Pakistan)--
that people should be supporting in the war zone. He can ask people to
donate clothing for Afghan children or seeds for Afghan farmers. He
could set up an office--yes, Glenn Beck, a czar--to coordinate this
effort. As I wrote yesterday, I'd favor something even more tangible--
a tax to fund the war effort--but I'm not holding my breath.
It has been a privilege for me to spend time with our military these
past eight years since September 11, 2001. The culture of service and
sacrifice--and the reciprocal provision, by the government, of gold-
plated social services that would thrill any liberal--represents the
best we can be as a society. In fact, the President should
appropriate the old Army slogan and say that it is time for us, as a
nation, to Be All We Can Be...in support of the Afghan war effort and
make some specific suggestions about how that can be done. It'll
produce a morale surge among the troops--and, I suspect, an endorphin-
laden feeling of solidarity among the rest of us as well.
Read more: http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/11/24/the-wrong-word/#more-18780#ixzz0XnyELyLm
what can we accomplish? nothing. more than the government is corrupt.
the country is made up of several ethnic groups who don't exactly get along.
all that's left is to get out.
A free and democratic Afghanistan can be a reality....btw, how is
our action in Afghanistan impacting your life? I'd say not at all, so
don't you fret.....
Mark
Word up. Remember a couple years ago when people said Iraq would
probably go to Al Quaeda and the cause of the government there was
doomed.
It is a reality, and it can be achieved on the ground, it is only a
question of will to do so, and with additional numbers available as
more Iraqi forces ramp up and free up allied forces it shouldn't be a
question. Heck even Obama said it was doable when he ran for
President.
yes, lets throw good money after bad.
can't have those who died did so in vain, so lets get thousands more killed.
after all. its just a matter of true belief and sincerity,. those two values
won WWII for the Germans after all.
==================================================================================
reality is bombs are going off in Iraq and nothing is settled there at all.
And you want MORE people to die for nothing?
> A free and democratic Afghanistan can be a reality....btw, how is
> our action in Afghanistan impacting your life? I'd say not at all, so
> don't you fret.....
It is affecting my pocketbook quite significantly.
Dan
the time to put a fire out is when its just starting, not when the house is
fully engulfed.
lots could have been domne then, but your hero the Chimperor chose not to do
it.
there was more money to be made with OBL alive than if he was dead.
the entire Iraq scam would have been impossible to connect to him and 9/11
if he had been caught.
you are a clueless git Fred. you'd have been with Hitler in the
Fuhrerbunker moving imaginary divisions on maps and wondering why you
weren't winning.
The object was to get OBL and crush Al Qaeda. now we are involved in nation
building and fighting the Taliban
OBL and Al Qaeda have moved on.
We were on the verge of winning when your hero the chimpler lost focus{with
your apparent approval}
BDS is a chronic condition and is obviously untreatable. Attacks of
BDS are mostly brought on by exposure to reality. The only known
treatment is exposure to a plethora of Paul Krugman columns or old
copies of the NYT.
That last sentence would be ruled as unconstitutional on the grounds
of cruel and unusual punishment. Krugman should have lived in the
USSR with the rest of the Central Committee.
===========================================================================
so Bush calling off the pursuit of OBL and the war against Al Qaeda is my
fault? lol
yeah nothing is ever the chimps fault.
you're like his ex-press secratary on TV last week saying how there were NO
terrorist attacks on America under Bush{9/11 anybody?}
you can toss all the lies you want. Bush fucked up everything. its not
derangement to notice, but it is to try to ignore it.
and how come you stopped giving us the daily updates on the stock market? is
it because its been stabilized and has recovered from the nose dive the
chimpler put it in?
Ray: Calm down and wipe the spittle off the screen. OBAMA is
president now. He is the decider. If he decides wrong, it is his
fault. Obama could end the war in Iraq immediately if he wanted but
you notice he has not done so. So far, the market is still down and
unemployment is waaaaaaay up.
Oh, where was the Dow when he took office? Where is it now?
7949 and 10,293 as of 1:41 EST
I suspect tthat Bush was successful in Iraq and Afghanistan because he
is competent. Obama is failing in Afghanistan because he is
incompetent. So far, Obama has failed at most actual things he has
tried to do except running for office.