Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Vasectomy&Prost

12 views
Skip to first unread message

Dave Goldenberg

unread,
Sep 1, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/1/97
to

If Dr. F wants to disregard the facts I have and can prove thats seems
to be his problem. I happen to have been apatient at Emory University
#10 in Urology in the Usd. Thet know what they are talking about. If
you have had a Vasectomy and you have had acute or chronic prostitits
and or epididymitis you have Post Vasectomy Syndrome. None of the
suggestions that have been posted here will help you get cured. You
need a Dr. that recognizes this is a new complication of Vasectomy and
needs to to treated in this matter. If you want the medical proof that
i have please E-mail. or any other help you need. Drs. are part of
this coverup and if this info got out to the public, which I hope it
will Urologists income will decrease alot. This is a very high profit
procedure.


pet...@cts.com

unread,
Sep 2, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/2/97
to

wyz...@mindspring.com (Dave Goldenberg) wrote:

Dave:

It would sure be nice if you would post your "proof" instead of
firing off this type of news article in this section. There's no real
point in saying "if you want proof e-mail me" when all of us are in
the same boat trying to find a cause for our pain regardless of the
basic reason for it. If you are willing to post what you believe to
be the truth then please do so. Otherwise please let us continue in
our quest for solutions. Thx.


pet...@cts.com

unread,
Sep 2, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/2/97
to

JetRobert

unread,
Sep 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/3/97
to

>pet...@cts.com writes

I would add that "proof" should be something more that anecdotal evidence.
Testing by reputable agencies using recognized procedures would be
preferred with documentation provided.

Robert................


Squizzly

unread,
Sep 7, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/7/97
to

>I would add that "proof" should be something more that anecdotal evidence.
> Testing by reputable agencies using recognized procedures would be
>preferred with documentation provided.

I like the anecdotal stuff, especially firsthand. Keep in mind that the
"reputable agencies" have been telling us that we're all a bunch of looneys
and whiners, and they have plenty of "tests" and "documentation" to prove
it. So Dave, if you've got a good anecdote to tell us, lets hear it.

JetRobert

unread,
Sep 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/8/97
to

I like the anecdotal stuff too as long as it is characterized as such.
Hearing peoples personal experiences can only be beneficial to others. But
when someone claims to have "proof", it should have something more to back
it up.

wyz...@mindspring.com

unread,
Sep 9, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/9/97
to

In article <19970908154...@ladder02.news.aol.com>,

I put 2 the e-mail addresses and the name of the Dr. that wrote the Post
Vasectomy Syndrome. If you get Post Vasectomy Syndrome, I guess you'll
find out why the Internet isn't full of information . The MEDICAL
COMMUNITY doesn't want anyone to know that it exists.Again
www.bpc.nl/uroweb/androweb/postvasectomy.html
www.graylab.ac.uk/cancernet/600326.htm

-------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====-----------------------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet

Dave

unread,
Sep 21, 1997, 3:00:00 AM9/21/97
to

squi...@aol.com (Squizzly) wrote:

>>I would add that "proof" should be something more that anecdotal evidence.
>> Testing by reputable agencies using recognized procedures would be
>>preferred with documentation provided.

>I like the anecdotal stuff, especially firsthand. Keep in mind that the
>"reputable agencies" have been telling us that we're all a bunch of looneys
>and whiners, and they have plenty of "tests" and "documentation" to prove
>it. So Dave, if you've got a good anecdote to tell us, lets hear it.

A vasovasectomy, a hernia operation and epididyectomy and 75 nerve
blocks and theres more!


0 new messages