Not Criticizing Israel is a Self-Ass-Biting Proposal for the Christian Zionistas
Mort Zuckerman
Stanle...@fiu.edu, emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, the-...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com,
for...@nytimes.com, nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov,
brigidc...@optonline.net, tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com,
jle...@courant.com, tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org,
thomas...@usdoj.gov, thoma...@po.state.ct.us,
kur...@washpost.com, georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com,
harol...@yale.edu, rrmcg...@aol.com
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, richar...@yale.edu,
harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu, inq...@aldf.com,
ly...@idsociety.org
Subject: Not Criticizing Israel is a Self-Ass-Biting Proposal for the
Christian Zionistas
Date: May 14, 2009 12:14 AM
ARTICLE BELOW
=============================
Allow me to propose the logic:
Zionist Christians who support Israel (and trash
Palestinians) and who say things like "Jesus would
have approved of torture," and who claim that Israel
needs to build the third temple in order to hasten the
return of Christ, are, by definition, summoning
the AntiChrist, since AntiChrist dominion precedes
the return of Christ, correct?
Then if one is hastening the rise of the AntiChrist
one is assisting the AntiChrist, and would themselves
be a participant in the AntiChrist's scheming.
"Even the elect will be deceived."
I'm jes trying to figger out if the Churchamaholics
have a way to see how stupid they are. Or better still,
if *they* can figger out who is serving the Kool-Aid.
Now, here's my favorite flavor:
http://www.actionlyme.org/BRITISH_PSYCHIATRY.htm
“If we accept the position that human mood, motivation, and emotion
are reflections of a neurochemical state of the brain, then drugs can
provide a simple, rapid, expedient means to produce any desired
neurochemical state that we wish. *** “The sooner that we cease to
confuse scientific and moral statements about drug use, the sooner we
can rationally consider the types of neurochemical states that we wish
to be able to provide for people.”*** This is the historical thinking
of the British strategists who want to destroy the U.S. presidency and
the American republic. And this is the criminal apparatus with which
they have equipped themselves to do it."
"The sooner we can cease to confuse scientific
and moral statements...
"The sooner we can infuse psychiatric mumbo-jumbo
terminology [throwing a fog over morality, ie,;
get rid of guilt and say 'perverions are commonplace
and therefore 'normal' due to their scientifically
proven (statistical analysis of their prevalence)
frewuency into common language and therefore thinking...
"The sooner we can soften people up to perversions
or desensitize people to perversions by talking
about them all the time through the psychiatric
mumbojumbo and shoving perverted (TV) crap and
language into the livingrooms of the common plebes...
"The sooner we can say things like 'victims of evil
shall be called "Depression" or "Anxiety Disorders"
and the perpetrators of evil we'll call the other kind
of "mental illness," "personality disorders," making
EVIL disappear from the common language... the sooner
we can drug everyone into oblivion, since the point
is to turn people into zombies."
"And Zombies are good, because they then don't come
up with ideas like 'Freemasons are covens of devil
worshippers,'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2UDOMXjCtM&feature=related
'Zionist Christians are asking for a hell of a time by
supporting Israel to hastening the return of the AntiChrist,
and saying things like "Jesus would approve of torture,"'
and proving scientifically that all psychotropics are brain
damaging:
http://www.actionlyme.org/BRAINDAMAGE.htm "
"We have to get people believing that Satan and
his angels do not exist"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2UDOMXjCtM&feature=related
"We have to get total control of people's minds"
So, it just strikes me that the very same people
who thunk up Eugenicizing Jews, the Rockefellers
and the British Self-Elected Intellectual Elite,
would in the end have created a condition where
Israel could next claim to be a Superior Race
which then re-invites Eugenics, when we have to
read about how it will be illegal to criticize
Israel (BELOW).
The Chistian Zionists are doing that - criticizing
Israel - by saying that we should help them build
the third temple, ASAP.
- - - - - - -
Eugenics.
That's what I think is next after we are not
allowed to criticize Israel.
First we can't criticize Israelis,... then they're
superior to everyone else,... then us'n inferiors will
have no rights and be enslaved,... and then whole races
will be exterminated.
Don't get me wrong. I am not claiming that
Israelis are a race. Or that any races are
inherently bad, since it is pretty retarded to
claim that "people chose their genes before they
were born," which is technically what the Mormons and
other racists claim. The Askenazim are a genetic cluster
as has been proven scientifically with schizophrenia
frequencies and other genetic abnormalities. I also
oppose the notion that religion is a race. I only
oppose the cultural ideology of the Israelis:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/17/opinion/17brooks.html
"Moreover, the status system doesn’t really revolve around
money. It consists of trying to ***prove you are savvier than
everybody else,*** that above all you are nobody’s patsy.
^^^Because I think such racism in the culture invites
murder or Eugenics.
http://www.voicesofpalestine.org/quotes/
I think the Israelis call us Gentiles "goyem" or
"cattle" or "cockroaches" or "dirt eaters" or some such
nonsense.
Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
=====================================
http://www.voltairenet.org/article159977.html
Criminalizing criticism of Israel is the end of free speech
by Paul Craig Roberts*
As everybody was being distracted by the swine flu hysteria, the U.S.
House of Representatives voted in favor of the Local Law Enforcement
Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009. As soon as it is approved by the
Senate, it will serve as a mechanism to undermine free speech making
it a crime, inter alia, for any American to criticize Israel’s
colonialist policies and brutal treatment of Palestinians.
13 May 2009
On October 16, 2004, President George W. Bush signed the Israel
Lobby’s bill, the Global Anti-Semitism Review Act. This legislation
requires the US Department of State to monitor anti-Semitism
worldwide.
To monitor anti-Semitism, it has to be defined. What is the
definition? Basically, as defined by the Israel Lobby and Abe Foxman,
it boils down to any criticism of Israel or Jews.
Rahm Israel Emanuel hasn’t been mopping floors at the White House. As
soon as he gets the Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 passed, it will
become a crime for any American to tell the truth about Israel’s
treatment of Palestinians and theft of their lands.
It will be a crime for Christians to acknowledge the New Testament’s
account of Jews demanding the crucifixion of Jesus.
It will be a crime to report the extraordinary influence of the Israel
Lobby on the White House and Congress, such as the AIPAC-written
resolutions praising Israel for its war crimes against the
Palestinians in Gaza that were endorsed by 100 percent of the US
Senate and 99 per cent of the House of Representatives, while the rest
of the world condemned Israel for its barbarity.
It will be a crime to doubt the Holocaust.
It will become a crime to note the disproportionate representation of
Jews in the media, finance, and foreign policy.
In other words, it means the end of free speech, free inquiry, and the
First Amendment to the Constitution. Any facts or truths that cast
aspersion upon Israel will simply be banned.
Given the hubris of the US government, which leads Washington to apply
US law to every country and organization, what will happen to the
International Red Cross, the United Nations Commission on Human
Rights, and the various human rights organizations that have demanded
investigations of Israel’s military assault on Gaza’s civilian
population? Will they all be arrested for the hate crime of
“excessive” criticism of Israel?
This is a serious question.
A recent UN report, which is yet to be released in its entirety,
blames Israel for the deaths and injuries that occurred within the
United Nations premises in Gaza. The Israeli government has responded
by charging that the UN report is “tendentious, patently biased,”
which puts the UN report into the State Department’s category of
excessive criticism and strong anti-Israel sentiment.
Israel is getting away with its blatant use of the American government
to silence its critics despite the fact that the Israeli press and
Israeli soldiers have exposed the Israeli atrocities in Gaza and the
premeditated murder of women and children urged upon the Israeli
invaders by rabbis. These acts are clearly war crimes.
It was the Israeli press that published the pictures of the Israeli
soldiers’ T-shirts that indicate that the willful murder of women and
children is now the culture of the Israeli army. The T-shirts are
horrific expressions of barbarity. For example, one shows a pregnant
Palestinian woman with a crosshairs over her stomach and the slogan,
“One shot, two kills.” These T-shirts are an indication that Israel’s
policy toward the Palestinians is one of extermination.
It has been true for years that the most potent criticism of Israel’s
mistreatment of the Palestinians comes from the Israeli press and
Israeli peace groups. For example, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz and
Jeff Halper of ICAHD have shown a moral conscience that apparently
does not exist in the Western democracies where Israel’s crimes are
covered up and even praised.
Will the American hate crime bill be applied to Haaretz and Jeff
Halper? Will American commentators who say nothing themselves but
simply report what Haaretz and Halper have said be arrested for
“spreading hatred of Israel, an anti-Semitic act”?
Many Americans have been brainwashed by the propaganda that
Palestinians are terrorists who threaten innocent Israel. These
Americans will see the censorship as merely part of the necessary war
on terror. They will accept the demonization of fellow citizens who
report unpalatable facts about Israel and agree that such people
should be punished for aiding and abetting terrorists.
A massive push is underway to criminalize criticism of Israel.
American university professors have fallen victim to the well
organized attempt to eliminate all criticism of Israel. Norman
Finkelstein was denied tenure at a Catholic university because of the
power of the Israel Lobby. Now the Israel Lobby is after University of
California (at Santa Barbara,) Professor William Robinson. Robinson’s
crime: his course on global affairs included some reading assignments
critical of Israel’s invasion of Gaza.
The Israel Lobby apparently succeeded in convincing the Obama Justice
[sic] Department that it is anti-Semitic to accuse two Jewish AIPAC
officials, Steven Rosen and Keith Weissman, of spying. The Israel
Lobby succeeded in getting their trial delayed for four years, and now
Attorney General Eric Holder has dropped charges. Yet, Larry Franklin,
the Department of Defense official accused of giving secret material
to Rosen and Weissman, is serving 12 years and 7 months in prison.
The absurdity is extraordinary. The two Israeli agents are not guilty
of receiving secrets, but the American official is guilty of giving
secrets to them! If there is no spy in the story, how was Franklin
convicted of giving secrets to a spy?
Criminalizing criticism of Israel destroys any hope of America having
an independent foreign policy in the Middle East that serves American
rather than Israeli interests. It eliminates any prospect of Americans
escaping from their enculturation with Israeli propaganda.
To keep American minds captive, the Lobby is working to ban as anti-
Semitic any truth or disagreeable fact that pertains to Israel. It is
permissible to criticize every other country in the world, but it is
anti-Semitic to criticize Israel, and anti-Semitism will soon be a
universal hate-crime in the Western world.
Most of Europe has already criminalized doubting the Holocaust. It is
a crime even to confirm that it happened but to conclude that fewer
than 6 million Jews were murdered.
Why is the Holocaust a subject that is off limits to examination? How
could a case buttressed by hard facts possibly be endangered by kooks
and anti-Semitics? Surely the case doesn’t need to be protected by
thought control.
Imprisoning people for doubts is the antithesis of modernity.
Paul Craig Roberts
Paul Craig Roberts fue Secretario Adjunto del Tesoro en el gobierno de
Reagan. Fue Editor Asociado de la página editorial del Wall Street
Journal y editor colaborador de National Review. Es coautor de “The
Tyranny of Good Intentions.” [La tiranía de las buenas intenciones.]
Para contactos, escriba a: PaulCrai...@yahoo.com
"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci