It was Jonathan Bush- cousin of the cop-killer judge John M. Walker (of the Walker-Bush family)
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
Chron...@yahoogroups.com, coh...@washpost.com, jdr...@nejm.org,
let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov, len...@courant.com,
we...@xplornet.com, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, the-...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com,
for...@nytimes.com, me...@nytimes.com, nati...@nytimes.com,
spo...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, ubi...@courant.com, ma...@concentric.net,
camp...@courant.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
edi...@commondreams.org, kur...@washpost.com, georg...@washpost.com,
hor...@courant.com, commissi...@po.state.ct.us,
cohen...@aol.com, leonar...@po.state.ct.us, FalN...@aol.com,
brans...@comcast.net, vts...@comcast.net, mcne...@aol.com,
o...@po.state.ct.us, da...@davila-dilzer.com,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
patrick....@jud.state.ct.us
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, hor...@courant.com,
bmi...@newstimes.com, eliot....@oag.state.ny.us,
tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com, billc...@gmail.com,
thomas...@usdoj.gov, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov
Subject: It was Jonathan Bush- cousin of the cop-killer judge John
M. Walker (of the Walker-Bush family)
Date: Mar 25, 2007 12:51 PM
RESPONDING TO THE OP-ED BELOW
----------------------
It was Jonathan Bush who handled the Saudi money for the 9/11
hijackers, just like
he laundered Pinochet's money, THROUGH THE RIGGS BANK, which is the
Bush family's
personal CIA Spook Bank:
http://www.actionlyme.org/LYME_CORRUPTICUT.htm
Jon Bush lives in the appropriately-named Killingworth, Corrupticut,
as does the
cop-killer lame-ass Judge John M. Walker, Chief Justice of the second
circuit (for
Corrupticut), both of whom also are still associated with Yale, which
was why I
filed the class action against the State of Corrupticut in Rhode
Island- so we
could avoid the Bushie-Yalie-Fraud-Banker-USCorruptiCourts.
The man here in the story below says the 9/11 Commission did not know
how the hijackers
got the Saudi cash to operate their little flight school thang. I'm
answering.
It was the Bush family bankers.
9/11 was probably a CIA sting- the hijackers were probably helped all
along by CIA
BushCo even more deliberately than through the Bush bankers. (I assume
everyone
knows Bush 41 was *always* in the CIA, since the end of WWII.)
Additionally, we should mention the FEMA report where they found
sulfur in the molten
metal. The FEMA report is linked from this page:
http://www.actionlyme.org/911_HOAX.htm
FEMA said they don't know where the sulfur came from, but that it
"probably
was involved in the process" that led to the WTC collapses.
THAT's WHAT *FEMA* SAID, OKay? Read it with your own eyeballs.
Sulfur is a *soft* metal and is used in explosives- AND NOT IN HARD
METALS. Think
about it.
The whole world knows about 9/11. Now Putin is *pissed* that he
allowed the US
to have military bases in Russia's former eastern- and southern
Eurasian- colonies.
The whole world is pissed because the whole world knows 9/11 was a
stunt for the
PNAC Oily- Israely Hegemony. 'For the PNAC "forward bases," that
so excites Dick Cheney that his BP is 10000 over 9000. You are
watching, folks,
the physiological expression of blood-curdling fear in combination
with greed in
Dick-with-the-red-face-and-the-blue-hands.
Ohhh Nooo!! We might have to *SHARE* the *OIL* (we don't own)!!!!
'Like a kid who quits the game and takes his ball home if the rest of
the kids
won't play by the ball-owner's rules. US "foreign policy" is
*that* frickin juvenile.
The 1993 WTC bombing was a sting operation too. Just ask Pat
Fitzgerald or Michael
Chertoff.
Kathleen M. Dickson
ActionLyme.org
==================================================
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_joe_plum_070324_the_9_2f11_lie_is_in_c.htm
March 24, 2007 at 09:09:54
The 9/11 Lie is in Critical Condition
by Joe Plummer
Tell A Friend
There was a time, not long ago, when daring to question the official
account of
9/11 was risky business. One was almost guaranteed to be attacked as a
"crazy
person" or a "traitor" or a "terrorist sympathizer." Times
have changed. At this point, less than 20% of the population believes
they were
given the full truth regarding 9/11. Logically one might ask: "Why is
that?"
It wasn't for lack of trying that the government failed in its
propaganda campaign.
It wasn't for lack of "helping hands" in the mainstream media. (Though
even that support has begun to fall apart.) No, it was one thing and
one thing only
that caused hundreds of millions of American citizens to openly
question the official
account of 9/11; the evidence.
In short, the evidence that we have been shamelessly lied to regarding
the events
of 9/11 is irrefutable. There is an enormous body of circumstantial
evidence, there
is an enormous body of physical evidence, and there is an enormous
body of historical
evidence. Perhaps most damning (at this point) is the ongoing cover up
itself. -The
deliberate attempt to obstruct an open discussion of the facts.
Evidence of that
grows by the hour, but not to worry...
If you want to see how the investigation into the attacks of 9/11 was
obstructed
at every turn; simply watch 9/11 Press for Truth.
If you want to learn the history of government sponsored "false flag"
terrorism, simply watch Terrorstorm.
If you want to see the evidence of controlled demolition (all of which
has been
completely ignored by the mainstream media and government talking
heads) check out
September 11 Revisited, or this segment of 911 Mysteries, or this
segment from Rise
of the Police State.
If you want to know what an absolute fraud the "investigation" we
finally
got was, you can get started with just a handful of issues. Like:
1. One of the most damning pieces of physical evidence regarding
the events
of 9/11 (the collapse of WTC 7) wasn't even mentioned in the 9/11
Commission
Report. How could any report claiming to provide "the fullest possible
account"
of the events of 9/11 ignore the unexpected free-fall collapse of a 47
story office
tower? Is it because, to this day, nobody can explain how it fell? Is
it because
it wasn't struck by any planes or burned with any jet fuel (the magic
formula
that supposedly brought down the twin towers?) Is it because pools of
molten metal
remained in its basement for weeks and partially evaporated steel
beams were found
in its wreckage? (It is physically impossible for burning office
materials and diesel
fuel to liquefy structural steel; let alone evaporate it into a gas.)
How did "The
Commission" deal with these smoking gun issues that clearly contradict
the
official account? Simple; they ignored them.
2. How about those towers? You know, the two 110 story buildings
constructed
with an outer shell of perimeter columns and an ENORMOUS inner array
of core columns
that supported the buildings' vertical loads. Of those towers, the
commission
report claimed "exterior walls bore most of the weight of the
building. The
interior core of the buildings was a hollow steel shaft." This is an
inexcusable
inaccuracy that any "investigator" with an Internet connection and 5
minutes
can easily prove wrong. And it should be noted; any claim or "theory"
of how the towers collapsed based on this erroneous "hollow shaft"
model
is fatally flawed. Who in their right mind can take an "official
report"
like this seriously? If they got something this simple wrong, what
else did they
miss?
3. Lets not forget "The Commission" said there was "no credible
evidence that any person in the United States gave the hijackers
substantial financial
assistance. Similarly, we have seen no evidence that any foreign
government-or foreign
government official-supplied any funding." Hmm, interesting. How about
the
Pakistani ISI chief who wired $100,000 to the alleged "lead hijacker"
Mohamed Atta? Indian intelligence has verified this. And there has
been no evidence
to refute it. Is that worth looking into? -And how about Sibel
Edmonds? Why was
she ignored and then gagged under the veil of "National Security."
Better
yet, how about we just have her testify in open hearings about "money
trails"
and where they lead to in our government?
And if all this isn't enough, maybe the few remaining skeptics would
like to
hear from some Senior Military, Intelligence, Law Enforcement, and
Government Officials
who question the validity of the 9/11 Commission Report. No problem.
Start here.
-So it's true. Times have changed and the people (for good reason) no
longer
believe the lies they've been fed about 9/11. We've woken up to the
level
of corruption in our government and the official lie (by all practical
means of
determination) is in critical condition and not expected to recover.
This can only mean one thing. An Independent investigation into the
attacks of 9/11
WILL BE conducted. And this time, it isn't going to be handful of
citizens asking
questions and demanding answers; it's going to be 80% of the country.
And this
time, you won't so easily ignore and whitewash the sensitive issues,
because
an educated citizenry is not so easily fooled. And this time, those
who have stonewalled,
lied, manipulated, covered up and acted in a criminally negligent
manner will be
held accountable for their actions.
To those in power who've forgotten the reality of their position in
government,
YOU SERVE AT THE PLEASURE OF THE CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA. Once
again, you're on notice to stop ignoring our demands for a new
investigation.
This issue isn't going to go away, and your refusal to address it will
cost
you dearly.
And to those of you with something to hide; perhaps now would be a
good time to
"lawyer up" and "cut a deal." The game is over.
Joe Plummer is a man who aims to destroy the Criminal Elite's system
of exploitation.
When not figuring out ways to do so, he enjoys relaxing in the
mountains of New
Hampshire with his wife and dogs.
Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author