CTPost: Lyme Cryme, Blumenthal, Blanchard, and Nick Harris
Mort Zuckerman
lPick...@cdc.gov, Durlan...@yale.edu, Aa...@columbia.edu,
gary_w...@nymc.edu, scientifi...@ostp.gov,
pkru...@princeton.edu, Stanle...@fiu.edu,
emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com,
harol...@yale.edu, sedm...@nswbc.org, rrmcg...@aol.com,
fr...@nytimes.com, dpr...@stmartin.edu, saint....@sbcglobal.net
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, criminal...@usdoj.gov,
karla.d...@usdoj.gov, christophe...@usdoj.gov,
richar...@yale.edu, harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu,
inq...@aldf.com, ly...@idsociety.org, meganm...@theatlantic.com
Subject: CTPost: Lyme Cryme, Blumenthal, Blanchard, and Nick Harris
Date: May 15, 2010 5:25 AM
ARTICLE BELOW
===========================
Nick Harris of Igenex could have sued
the Yale/NYMC Lyme crooks for scientific
fraud. He has the expertise, was at Dearborn
http://www.actionlyme.org/Dearborn_Who_Approved.htm
and he certainly has the money
to bring a lawsuit:
http://www.actionlyme.org/HARRIS_IGENEX_DEARBORN.pdf
I have a simple timeline of the crime
on my homepage now, but also this one
for later use:
http://www.actionlyme.org/FALSIFIED_TESTING.htm
Harris doesn't sue because he has a
monopoly and a free PR firm called
ILADS.org, a volunteer for which is
Diane Blanchard through association with
Pat Smith of the lymediseaseassociation.org
who I previously mentioned, is
PsyOps - deliberately or not:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.diseases.lyme/browse_thread/thread/160f86bad217bc38?hl=en#
ILADS.org does not want to be investigated,
either. If they were investigated, it
would be found that a majority of them
are malpractice-treating Lyme brain with
psychotropics:
http://www.actionlyme.org/BRAIN_PERMANENT.htm
The Psych.org's guidelines on the treatment
of delirium (shown by SPECT scanning as
hypoperfusion or reduced blood flow to the
brain:
http://www.actionlyme.org/PHILLIPS_JE_PERVERT.htm )
say "it is malpractice in any case to
not treat a delirium medically (with
actual medicine as opposed to neurotoxic
neurotransmitter blockers)":
http://www.actionlyme.org/BUNNEY_YALE_BRAIN_DAMAGE.htm
That happens to be why Ely Lilly
was sued and fined $1.7 billion:
http://www.yoism.org/?q=node/274
ILADS.org does not dare instruct
their groupies in how to speak
"Scientific Validity." It would
then apply to all the psychiatrists
and psychologists in ILADS.org.
A really good way to see through
all of this is to watch several
episodes of A&E's "Criminal Minds."
In the end, the actors always refer
back to "Evil," rather than anything
in the DSM. The logic conflicts
appear... because Truth, um, "finds
a way."
Here again we see it emerging -
rearing its gorgeous head - and the
likes of ILADS hiding behind someone
completely uneducated to do their
PR work...
You do not see the president of ILADS.org
stating that "Dearborn was a scientific
hoax," "the diagnostic standard is scientifically
invalid," and "Klempner is scientifically invalid."
You do not see ILADS.org publishing
a paper in any journal refuting, line
by line, the entire IDSA "Guidelines."
The thing about psychiatry is that one
becomes so irrational, that they can't see
that remaining loyal to a hundred or so
colleagues will in the end injure and kill
millions. MDs are sworn, I believe, to
care for and protect sick humans.
http://www.actionlyme.org/DIABOLICAL_PERVERSION_PSYCHOANALYSIS.htm
The notion that "I gotta take care of
MEEeeee, FIRST!" - the thing brainwashed
into psychiatrists in psychiatry school -
does not quite jive with the likes of
what, say, real soldiers do.
No where in their vocabulary is the word
"oppression" - yet more than half the
world suffers it.
Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
http://www.relapsingfever.org
======================================
http://www.ctpost.com/local/article/Lyme-advocates-look-for-action-from-AG-after-487506.php
A local Lyme disease advocacy group is calling for Connecticut's
attorney general to continue the fight to alter controversial
treatment guidelines.
Greenwich-based Time for Lyme is circulating a petition urging
Attorney General Richard Blumenthal to look into the recent decision
by a special panel, formed as part of an antitrust investigation, to
allow the guidelines to remain unchanged.
The eight-member review panel issued its report three weeks ago,
unanimously agreeing to uphold the disease treatment guidelines
developed in 2006 by the Arlington, Va.-based Infectious Diseases
Society of America.
The guidelines, among other things, don't recommend treating Lyme
disease with antibiotics for more than a few weeks and say there is no
evidence that chronic Lyme disease exists.
Time for Lyme says it wants Blumenthal to hold the IDSA legally
accountable for violating the agreement with his office and to
vigorously investigate what the group says are voting and other
process irregularities.
"We feel there is unfinished business with the IDSA guidelines process
that was started by the AG," said Diane Blanchard, co-president of
Time for Lyme, a nonprofit group that advocates for better research
into and treatment of the disease. "This precedent-setting process may
have long-term implications for Lyme patients and in fact for all
patients who could be subject to standard-setting guidelines for any
disease."
While Blumenthal's investigation uncovered numerous conflicts of
interest on the guidelines panel, resulting in the guidelines review,
evidence shows the recent IDSA review process violated that agreement,
according to the petition.
Advocates note that the special panel didn't include professionals who
treat people with Lyme disease. Blanchard has said that an ombudsman
who screened all applicants to the panel for conflicts of interest,
such as a financial interest related to Lyme disease, was paid by the
IDSA.
"We are carefully and comprehensively assessing the final report and
the review process leading to that report to determine whether the
IDSA fulfilled the requirements of our settlement," Blumenthal said in
a statement Wednesday.
John Heys, a spokesman for the IDSA, said the review panel's final
report, which notes that the 2006 guidelines are based on the best
science available, "speak for themselves regarding the points raised
in the petition."
Earlier this year, Blumenthal wrote a letter to the IDSA saying he was
concerned that the review panel was not following proper procedure
stipulated in the settlement agreement.
Blumenthal noted that the panel should have voted on whether each of
the 2006 treatment recommendations were medically and scientifically
justified in light of the evidence presented at the July hearing.
Instead, based on information pertaining to the panel's voting, the
group had only voted on whether each of the guidelines should be
revised, rewritten or remain unchanged.
Heys said after the report was released that Blumenthal's concerns
about the voting process had been addressed by the panel.
Staff Writer Lisa Chamoff can be reached at lisa.c...@scni.com or
203-625-4439.
"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci