“Neurodegenerative Diseases and IDSA” = nothing to worry about for the long-term future.
Mort Zuckerman
lPick...@cdc.gov, Durlan...@yale.edu, Aa...@columbia.edu,
gary_w...@nymc.edu, scientifi...@ostp.gov,
pkru...@princeton.edu, Stanle...@fiu.edu,
emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com,
harol...@yale.edu, sedm...@nswbc.org, rrmcg...@aol.com,
fr...@nytimes.com, dpr...@stmartin.edu, saint....@sbcglobal.net
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, criminal...@usdoj.gov,
karla.d...@usdoj.gov, christophe...@usdoj.gov,
richar...@yale.edu, harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu,
inq...@aldf.com, ly...@idsociety.org, meganm...@theatlantic.com
Subject: “Neurodegenerative Diseases and IDSA” = nothing to worry
about for the long-term future.
Date: Jun 21, 2010 7:46 AM
ARTICLE BELOW
“Neurodegenerative Diseases and IDSA” =
nothing to worry about for the long-term future.
TLR2 agonism in humans (infections that
are regulated by TLR2 or that regulate its
expression) is the key to every major
human disease (cancer, ALS, Alzheimer's, Lupus,
MS, HIV...). You can confirm this by multiple
simple searches on MedLine:
Eg., TLR2 and Alzheimer's:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.govpubmed?term=tlr2[All%20Fields]%20AND20%2822alzheimer%20disease%22[MeSH%20Terms]%20OR%20%2822alzheimer%22[All%20Fields]%20AND20%22disease%22[All%20Fields]29%20OR%20%22alzheimer%20disease%22[All%20Fields]%20OR20%22alzheimer%27s%22[All%20Fields]%29&cmd=DetailsSearch
IDSA can't acknowledge this new direction
of research because OspA was a TLR2 agonist
and was the essence of the Great- and the
New Great- Imitator's mechanisms of disease.
You can confirm independently that IDSA does
not really participate in any kind of research.
They're a "society," which is like a lobby.
They have nothing going on scientifically.
They can't participate, any more, in science
even if they wanted to, without admitting that
they changed the diagnostic standard for this
Imitator by falsely claiming the antibody
response didn't become stealth - seronegative -
through spirochetal blebbing of TLR2 agonists;
the likes of OspA. Nearly all disease is a
consequence of that process (TLR2 agonism, the
vaccination with OspA).
This is a huge scientific medical error
and they have no other response but to bash
their, already, double-victims.
Unfortunately, again, the Camp B - ILADS.org
has no clue what's going on either. They never
speak to the exact, specific fraud in the testing:
http://www.actionlyme.org/SV_PPT_2_files/v3_document.htm
And they have never engaged the question of
what OspA is, either.
Just remember that IDSociety.org is a lobby,
nearly identical to AIPAC in every way:
John Bolton is Edward McSweegan.
Netanyayu is Durland Fish.
They stalk and trash their victims.
They steal US weapons secrets.
They lie.
They're cowards.
Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
http://www.relapsingfever.org
=========================================
http://www.fosters.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100620/GJOPINION_0102/706209841/-1/FOSOPINION
Don't try to convince the sick that they aren't sick
By Lucy Barnes
Director Lyme disease Education and Support Group of America
Centreville, Md.
Sunday, June 20, 2010
The commentary is in response to a one on Lyme disease and medical
legislation by David Itkin, MD of Portsmouth, published Sunday, June
6.
It was obvious by the cookie-cutter letter that Dr. Itkin wrote that
he is an Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) supporter. It's
shameful, but it appears the IDSA has enlisted another patsy to
promote their "we are the world" symphony to enlighten the uneducated
and try to convince the sick they aren't really sick after all.
Some members in the IDSA's camp, like Dr. Itkin, claim publicly to
have compassion for patients who remain ill after their recommended
"cost-effective", insurance friendly treatment protocol fails to cure
patients.
Rather than treat the sick, as the doctor admits he doesn't, he
instead offers them a 45-minute lecture telling them they are either
sick with something else (of course doctors can't be wrong), have
mysteriously become mentally ill after having a documented tick bite
and positive Lyme tests, or are gullible enough to simply think they
are benefiting from a placebo effect when they do get better with
appropriate treatment.
The doctor did share one thought most can agree with, "The patient-
doctor relationship should allow for an individualized approach, for
this or any illness." Yet in the same breath he is against a bill (not
sure he read it) that provides patients and the doctors treating them
a choice of treatment, unlike his beloved IDSA guidelines.
The bill does not promote a specific treatment; it only allows choices
for both doctors and patients, without fear of prosecution.
I truly wish those being sucked into the IDSA's web (for whatever
reason) would take the time to actually read the IDSA guidelines to
see how restrictive and ridiculous they actually are and read the
bills they continue to fight before they ring-a-ding-ding the old worn
out chant ... "I don't know what you have, but it isn't Lyme disease
and you don't need treatment for it."
They should also read the final report that indicates the IDSA was
being way too big for its britches when it wrote the guidelines and
states they need to knock down their ratings for their recommendations
or actually provide proof to support them.
If people only realized how unscientific, nonsensical, self-promoting
and full of conflicts of interest the IDSA guidelines were, they too
would back as far away as possible from the handful of guideline
authors who keep pushing them, least they go down with the ship too.
After all, if Camp A was right, there wouldn't be a Camp B.
"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci