Subject: CT Rich People Are Taking "Security" Action (PCRoberts on the
Globalists' Abattoir)
Date: Nov 13, 2009 2:36 AM
ARTICLES BELOW
===========================
Well, there is a lot you can learn
from having a fake Psy-Ops website,
like the one subpoenaed by the USDOJ
for its IP addresses and bank accounts
etc logs (indymedia.us) or mine.
The-Rich-People-For-Whom-the-Snob, -
Whore, and StupidSlut-For-the-Bigs-Jodi
-Rell-Works ***are hiring the likes of utc.com
(Hartford, CT) who just purchased GE's
(Stamford, CT) Security Wing, and the likes
of drs-ss.com*** to protect themselves from
the witless masses who *might* one day
decide to perform a do-over of what
happened to the White Russians as
seen in Dr. Zhivago- move in, take
their property, chop up the furniture
for firewood...
http://www.actionlyme.org/091112.htm
So, some people (maybe 10) find the
US Slaughter to be offensive on moral
grounds (Cooper, PCRoberts), but the
rest, we know, don't care because it is
painful to one's brain and even *excruciating*
to people with TV-induced ADHD (99.9% of
Americans), which is something you can
see with your own eyes, when you attempt
to begin the Overall Discussion:
They run away. They turn sideways and
lean away, as if "Oh, the phone's ringing,
Gotta Go!"
It hurts to think. The US vanity-driven
brainscramble actually physically pains the
brain after years of TV addiction.
Or: They sneer with cold, black eyes- with
the deepest, sincerest hatred:
http://www.actionlyme.org/PHILLIPS_JE_PERVERT.htm
You can see it clearly in their eyes
once cornered with the truth. It's
black-eyed and unblinking. FIERCE
HATRED, as if to say, "Mention it again
and I will crucify you"
http://www.jesus-passion.com/THE_PASSION_3.5.htm#CHAPTER%20XXXVIII
‘He will not stretch himself out, but we will help him;’
You can't rally the masses. Each
individual will be on his or her
own. Nothing warns them. If I told
everyone, "Ya know, the Bigs and their
pimps-n-whores in politics and in the
dot.gov unions are preparing to kill you
if you react to the homelessness and
starvation, and they already know
what you're thinking and planning
before you even think it or plan it.
'Like the day you realize 16 dollar
a gallon gasoline won't get you to
work, if you *have* work," no one
would lift a finger until that day
comes and then they're dead or in
one of the gulags that have been
built across the country for this very
purpose.
The Bigs moved. The Rich People in
Corrupticut moved.
This week.
They did something *THIS* *WEEK* about
the TV-ADHD masses. They've made sure.
They're ready.
Who do you think Jodi Rell is working
for?
http://www.actionlyme.org/KISSINGER_TERROR.htm
He lives here, remember?
So do the Bushie-Walker Banksters and
Judges:
http://www.actionlyme.org/LYME_CORRUPTICUT.htm
http://www.courant.com/business/hc-utc-ge-security.artnov13,0,7299001.story
"In 2002, United Technologies Corp.'s security business didn't exist,
and so the conglomerate's new deal with General Electric would have
come as a shock at the time.
"Since then, UTC has invested more than $7 billion to assemble its
Farmington-based Fire & Security unit, which sells a wide variety of
equipment, from safes to safety equipment and controls for access and
***surveillance.***"
Hired by whom?
http://www.actionlyme.org/091112.htm
KMDickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
http://www.relapsingfever.org
=====================================
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/11/12
http://original.antiwar.com/roberts/2009/11/12/myths-of-our-time/
Myths of Our Time
Posted By Paul Craig Roberts On November 12, 2009 @ 11:00 pm In
Uncategorized | 1 Comment
It is conventional wisdom that it was the draft that ended the Vietnam
war. According to this explanation, cowardly college students subject
to the draft and their unpatriotic families, forced an end to the
war. This is Karl Marx’s explanation. Material interests, not empty
morality, are said to have brought the war to an end.
The fact that in those days the US still had an independent media of
sorts that sometimes framed the war in moral terms is ignored. Are we
sure, for example, that the film of the naked little girl running in
terror down the road burning with napalm was ineffectual in arousing
moral opposition to the war? Are we certain that it wasn’t an aroused
moral conscience that brought about the end of the war but was
college students’ fears for their lives and limbs?
If we ascribe ending the war to material interests, it makes ending
the war look as unworthy as the war itself.
Yet, virtually every conservative columnist, commentator, newsperson
and politician, as well as today’s antiwar protesters and apparently
the Pentagon, believes that a military draft would reduce Americans’
toleration for wars because of body bags coming home to middle and
upper class parents. Apparently, the lower class doesn’t mind its kids
coming back in body bags.
Those in thrall to this explanation, which derives from Marx’s
materialist explanation of history, do not notice that Vietnam was our
longest war. It apparently took almost forever for the material
interest of students and their parents to realize itself and stop the
war.
Why are we afraid to say that the war stopped because American troops
and the American population got tired, offended even, from killing
women, children and noncombatants? Vietnam had not attacked the US.
The US had interjected itself into a civil war in a far off place, as
it has done in Afghanistan.
By invading Iraq the US started a civil war between Sunni and
Shi’ite. In Pakistan the US has started a civil war between the
religious tribal population and the secular US puppet state. In
Palestine the US started a civil war between Fatah and Hamas.
One continuously reads from those Americans opposed to America’s wars
of aggression that the wars are possible because they don’t affect
Americans, just those few who sign up for the voluntary military.
Thus, there are insufficient material interests at stake to stop the
war. This is a common explanation for the weakness of the antiwar
movement.
One could argue instead that it is the triumph of Karl Marx’s
materialist thinking that has made moral protests impotent. What is
morality? You can’t weigh it, define it, measure it. It can be
dismissed as the whining of material interests. In contrast, material
interests, such as lives, limbs, and bank accounts are real.
For whatever the reason, morality has shown itself to be an impotent
force in 21st century America. Americans show no remorse at over one
million dead Iraqis and four million displaced Iraqis due entirely to
an American invasion based on lies and deception. The lies and
deception are now well proven. Yet, there has been no apology for the
horrors that Americans inflicted on Iraq.
Afghanistan is another example. Intentional lies conflated the
Taliban with al-Qaeda and "terrorists." The diverse peoples in
Afghanistan who were first ravaged by Soviet bombs are now ravaged by
American bombs. Weddings, funerals, children’s soccer games, people
waiting for fuel or food, people asleep in their homes, people
attending mosques have all been murdered and are murdered routinely by
US and its NATO puppets.
Each time civilians are murdered, the US denies it, only to be
contradicted every time by the evidence.
Why is the president of the United States contemplating sending yet
tens of thousands more US troops to kill people in Afghanistan?
The answer is that the United States is an immoral country, with an
immoral people and an immoral government. Americans no longer have a
moral conscience. They have gone over to the Dark Side.
Humanity has endeavored for millennia to control evil with morality.
In the American "superpower," this effort has collapsed and failed.
The United States needs to be censured for its immoral behavior, not
have that behavior rationalized as being in its material interests.
Read more by Paul Craig Roberts
"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci