Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Sexual / Physical / Emotional Abuse in "Foster Care" "News" (Courant)
5 views
Skip to first unread message
Mort Zuckerman
Dec 3, 2011, 5:41:10 AM12/3/11
to
To: kathleen...@hhs.gov, francis...@nih.hhs.gov,
margaret...@fda.hhs.gov, dwh...@forbes.com,
ca...@drcarolgoodheart.com, lPick...@cdc.gov, Durlan...@yale.edu,
Aa...@columbia.edu, gary_w...@nymc.edu,
scientifi...@ostp.gov, pkru...@princeton.edu,
Stanle...@fiu.edu, margaret...@hhs.fds.gov,
emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@ct.gov, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@ct.gov, kur...@washpost.com, georg...@washpost.com,
p...@allegorypress.com, commissi...@po.state.ct.us,
brans...@comcast.net, vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us,
freet...@charter.net, scott....@po.state.ct.us,
govern...@po.state.ct.us, attorney...@ct.gov,
randall...@usdoj.gov, Robert....@yale.edu, editor@greenwich-
post.com, harol...@yale.edu, sedm...@nswbc.org, rrmcg...@aol.com,
fr...@nytimes.com, saint....@sbcglobal.net
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com,
rast...@aol.com, billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com,
rjmu...@aol.com, paulcrai...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, richar...@yale.edu,
harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu, inq...@aldf.com,
ly...@idsociety.org, meganm...@theatlantic.com
Subject: Sexual / Physical / Emotional Abuse in "Foster Care"
"News" (Courant)
Date: Dec 3, 2011 5:36 AM
Well, well, well. It finally comes out.
http://www.actionlyme.org
http://www.courant.com/community/glastonbury/hc-ap-ct-adoptiveparents-adec01,0,479829.story
and
http://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-glastonbury-abuse-1203-20111202,0,6033880.story
The lawsuit against me for reporting multiple lines of evidence of
abuse against multiple children in foster care in New London, CT (the
children reported it to me, and then I got my video camera, so please
see the testimony of the children, here) which the New London Police
and DCF refused to investigate in 2006:
http://www.actionlyme.org/andersonpenisbiter.htm
The woman/abuser/foster "carer" lost her house and filed for
bankruptcy because DCF no longer provided her with pediatric bodies to
feed the mortgage company.
http://www.actionlyme.org/110504_PENISBITER_MOTION.htm
But they did not formally prosecute her.
Why?
Because they knew about it. The DCF deliberately lied in court and
blamed the injuries on the real mother in "court," knowing the
children were with this abuser, Annette Anderson, for 11 days by the
time the babies were brought to the doctor (Dr. Dennis Long, "Gales
Ferry, CT, Pediatrics").
CT Assistant Attorney General William Wholean ("prosecutor")
orchestrated the perjury with this foster abuser, Anderson, such that
the genital injuries were blamed on the biological mother. But the
children were with the foster abuser (who sued me for reporting her to
the authorities) for the preceding 11 days.
The father of the abused children has filed a motion to be a party to
the case.
http://www.actionlyme.org/111117_ANDERSON_INKEL_MOTION.html or
(UPDATE to the penisbiter's lawsuit against me for reporting her
penisbiting to police and DCF, Nov 20, 2011; Motion to countersue
Annette Anderson by the Inkel Family is copied in below.)
The Child Protective Services is a totally "political" (means "secret,
criminal") organization like the Food and Drug Administration and the
National Institutes of Health. They do nothing based on facts or
merit. It's all for show, and it's all about themselves.
They only make a big ta-do in the press when they get caught.
Now would be a good time to brush up on your spiritual training
because you'd have to wonder how the hell such crime and debauchery as
the illegal Iraq/Oil wars, the fake federal "judges" Mukasy and John
M. Walker of the Walker-Bush Family of Killingworth, CT,
http://www.actionlyme.org/LYME_CORRUPTICUT.htm
the Israelis infiltrating Yale (How Private Warmongers and the US
Military Infiltrated American Universities | Truthout
http://www.truth-out.org/how-private-warmongers-and-us-military-infiltrated-american-universities/1321396333
) thinking up stupidiological ideas like "Lyme is a bad knee" and
"Iraq will be throwing flowers and oil at us within 6 weeks of the
March 2003 invasion," ...
... the Yale psychiatric pervert agenda where "Sex Cures All
Diseases,... which are to be blamed on the victims in the first
place, ...
http://www.actionlyme.org/PHILLIPS_JE_PERVERT.htm
... the fake vaccine UConn/Yale tested out on Czech children guinea
pigs, were there were 22% "severe" adverse events, not to mention the
fact that there is none of Yale's LYMErix kind of Lyme in Europe
http://www.actionlyme.org/UCONNS_ABUSE_OF_CZECH_CHILDREN.htm
), ...
... and this pandemic kidnapping and kidnappee (and parent) abuses
could be taking place in one small place, Connecticut.
Read what one of its victims says about Life With DCF, recently:
"Carlos Harasz, a student at Central Connecticut State University,
said that he and his siblings were shuffled among foster families and
were suffering from ***"reactive attachment disorder," which is common
among children who have been passed from home to home or who have been
removed from their parents' homes.***
"***The condition can be lifelong,*** and its symptoms include
withdrawal, aggression, lying, stealing and pushing away adults who
attempt a lasting emotional connection.
"The allegations against Harasz and Wirth were directly attributable
to reactive attachment disorder, Carlos Harasz said.
"'When you go through foster care, you have a lot of issues,' he said.
'When you've been with 20 other families who've done you wrong,
***somebody has to take the blame.*** It doesn't have to be the people
who saved our lives.'"
From: http://www.courant.com/community/glastonbury/hc-glastonbury-abuse-1201-20111130,0,1281866.story
(The boy said that in defense of the sex-abuser foster parents, but
perhaps this one was too old to abuse at the time, in the foster-
abusers' minds.)
But, ...
...the "somebody who takes the blame" usually is the kids themselves
(and who are then drugged, since victim-blaming is what psychiatry
does with their "diagnoses,"
http://www.actionlyme.org/BRAINDAMAGE.htm
) but also the biological parents.
See in detail what kind of abuse the Inkel children had to suffer:
http://www.actionlyme.org/111117_ANDERSON_INKEL_MOTION.html
It's quite outrageous. From being forced to eat garbage to "Military
type stress positions" - a punishment ordered by the foster-carer's
alleged boyfriend...
This ▲ motion/report, above, by the biological parents is quite
graphic and details some of what took place over the long term, and
repeatedly.
And it was repeatedly covered up by a New London County, CT,
pediatrician who had to repeatedly treat the genital injuries to the
multiple children, but he never reported the abuser, Anderson, to the
DCF or the police.
This is how these things get out of hand. DCF repeatedly lies to
cover for itself, and they repeatedly blame the victims of their own
crimes. And that is exactly what Yale/UConn does re anything.
'Regarding any illness or condition, 'Regarding any health or life
matter.
'Regarding all human needs.
Why?
Connecticut is evil and stupid. The residents and the "State
employees" are greedy, stupid, and evil. There is no expertise, here,
in Connecticut, of any kind, and there is no "Justice Department"
representation by Uncle Washington Sam.
Connecticut citizens are the most insincere, phony, cynical, miserly
and greedy people in the world. Connecticut is the lead New World
Order state.
That means you will not find one decent lawyer or judge who performs
any work or action based on the situation's merit. It is as bad in
Connecticut - worse, because of the Gestapo/KGB's per capita density
in Connecticut - as it ever was in Stalin's Russia or NAZI Germany.
Mr. Richard Blumenthal went to Washington and we never heard from him
again.
111203, kmdickson
------------------------
http://www.actionlyme.org/111117_ANDERSON_INKEL_MOTION.html
Docket Nos. KNL-CV-08-5008286S
ANDERSON, ANNETTE vs. DICKSON,KATHLEEN
CONNECTICUT SUPERIOR COURT
70 Huntington Street
New London, CT
KNL-CV-08-5008286S
and
KNL-CV09-6001587S
NOVEMBER, 17, 2011
MOTION BY AN INTERESTED NON PARTY TO BECOME APARTY.
The Movants PHILIP INKEL, et aL, respectfully move the court for an
order to allow the NON PARTY MOVANTS NAMED HEREIN to be made parties
in the above captioned matter as Plaintiffs pursuant to C. G. S.
52-102 and 52-101. Movants have interest intimately related to the
nature of this case.
The facts described herein are relied upon by Movants to join this
Action.
1) ANNETTE ANDERSON through her ATTORNEY KENNETH LEARY have
brought about this action in the CONNECTICUT Superior Court against
KATHLEEN DICKSON, suing for defamation of character, accusing KATHLEEN
DICKSON of falsely and publically stating to the world via the
internet and other communication devices that ANNETTE ANDERSON working
on behalf of a corrupt and unlawful administration of Connecticut
State government engaged in dishonesty, perjury, and multiple acts of
child abuse, child battery, and sexual offenses to children.
In addition, Kathleen Dixon publically states ANNETTE ANDERSON is
accused of conspiring with said corrupt administration and ASSISTANT
ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM WHOLEAN, ATTORNEY VALERIE ALEXANDER,
ATTORNEY KENNETH LEARY, and JUDGE STUART DAVID BEAR, JUDGE CARL
TAYLOR the defraud the Connecticut Superior Court and the U.S.Court,
District of Connecticut, in various cases regarding the MOVANTS in
those courts in order to obstruct justice and to protect a
racketeering enterprise.
Specifically, said perpetrators participated in a scheme to obstruct
justice in this matter to cover up said abuses and other crimes and
unlawful conduct engaged in by the said perpetrators and other persons
working on behalf of said governing authority by engaging in practices
of administrating dishonesty in governmental and judicial services.
Said individuals have all collectively and individually prepared false
governmental and judicial documentation and have applied them to the
public record and governmental work products as they relateto this
case. Said individuals have further conspired to obstruct state and
federal justice and to violate the STATE OF CONNECTICUT’S mandatory
reporting of suspected child abuse laws.
2) ANNETTE ANDERSON seeks an order silencing KATHLEEN
DICKSON from further disseminating said speech to any other personsand
entities and to take from her compensation for unspecified claimed
damages.
2) PHILIP INKEL and MEREDITH INKEL are the parents of minor children
ALEXANDER, ANDREW, and ANASTASIA INKEL.
3) Specifically, REGARDING CHILD ABUSE, ANNETTE ANDERSON claims that
KATHLEEN DICKSON did falsely broadcast to the world population that,
inter alia, ANNETTE ANDERSON with the knowledge and consent of the
aforementioned persons and entities did cruelly,
physically,emotionally, sexually and violently did abuse, batter and
torture repetitively from Nov 3, 2003 to early August, 2004 ANASTASIA
INKEL. And then, from on or about October 6th, 2004 continuing to
approximately June, 2005 Annette Anderson did the same abuse again to
ALEXANDER, ANDREW, and ANASTASIA INKEL.
4) KATHLEEN DICKSON further reports and disseminates to the federal
and CONNECTICUT governments as well as the world population that
individuals employed in CONNECTICUT and UNITED STATES Government have
conspired to obstruct justice by concealing with ANNETTE ANDERSON the,
inter alia, said crimes against the STATE, ALEXANDER, ANDREW, and
ANASTASIA INKEL. Specifically she reports that Connecticut and Federal
administrators have failed to investigate, document, stop and
prosecute such offenses despite the facts of overwhelming evidence of
said crimes and continue to ignore and cover it up till time of this
writing.
5) MEREDITH INKEL, PHILLIP INKEL, ALEXANDER INKEL, ANDREW INKEL,
ANASTASIA INKEL have an interest adverse to ANNETTE ANDERSON in the
above matter in that ANNETTE ANDERSON DID ENGAGE IN THE AFOREMENTIONED
ACTS AND CONSPIRACIES and that she continues to conspire with
CONNECTICUT State employees to conceal said crimes.
6) MEREDITH and PHILIP INKEL also reasonably believe DR. DENNIS LONG
conspired with said party to conceal medical evidence of and the
existence of injuries and abuse of a serious nature to ALEXANDER,
ANDREW and ANASTASIA INKEL. ANASTASIA INKEL does not have
Neurofibromatosis or “café au lait” spots as claimed by DENNIS LONG.
Therefore the darkened tissue on ANASTASIA’S leg was probably a bruise
–consistent with the other bruises the children clearly acquired in
the “care”of ANNETTE ANDERSON. DENNIS LONG, MD., did not report to
“authorities” of any kind to our knowledge, that the INKEL CHILDREN
sustained genital injuries on 10/16/04 (ANASTASIA, who had been in
ANDERSON’S care for 10 or 11 days prior to this visit, having been
removed or kidnapped from the INKELS from the grounds of WATERFORD, CT
court house on or about 10/05/04).
7) In Evidence in this case[KNL-08-500868S], a photograph of ANDREW
INKEL’S black eye, obtained in ANNETTE ANDERSON’S “care”:
http://www.actionlyme.org/INKEL_MOTION_APPEARANCE_files/image008.jpg
8) For all relevant times andinstances, MERIDITH INKEL and PHILIP
INKEL rely upon medical reports of ALEXANDER, ANDREW and ANASTASIA
INKEL, each, of having facts that suggest sexual and physical abuse
occurred, and of ALEXANDER and ANDREW INKEL reporting verbally to
their parents on or about june 2004, that ANNETTE ANDERSON “bit”and
“pinched” their “peepees.” The following link is to the video of the
children giving this unsolicited testimony:
http://www.actionlyme.org/INKEL_ABUSE_FILE_RENDERED_31_JULY_06_2.wmv
9) ANNETTE ANDERSON and NANCY INKEL testified that ANASTASIA INKEL had
a severe diaper rash and both persons described it to be an untreated
“open and raw” wound from her vagina to her anus. All stated that
ANASTASIA INKEL was in a lot of pain as a result of the wound. The
wound as described was so severe and medically neglected that criminal
charges are and were required. DCF, said court officers and ANNETTE
ANDERSON conspired to attribute this “diaper rash” to MEREDITH
INKEL,however, ANASTASIA INKEL had been in the “care” of ANNETTE
ANDERSON for 10 or11 days prior to the office visit for treatment of
this genital wound as appears in the following link on DEFENDANT
DICKSON’S website:
http://www.actionlyme.org/INKEL_MOTION_APPEARANCE_files/image004.jpg
ANNETTE ANDERSON conspired with ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM
WHOLEAN,NANCY INKEL, and DCF employee JO-EL SUROVIAK to defraud the
court regarding this “diaper rash” incident.
10) MISTAKEN IDENTITY RUSE, #1:
Independently of all of this, ANNETTE ANDERSON brought another infant
to DR. DENNIS LONG on 8/30/04 who she claimed to be ANASTASIA INKEL
and who was not ANASTASIA INKEL, because ANASTASIA had been returned
to her biological parents, PHILIP and MEREDITH INKEL, before that date
(but removed again on or about 10/5/04), and unsurprisingly, this
unknown child,too, had genital injury/infection.
The doctor’s (DENNIS LONG) notesread:
http://www.actionlyme.org/INKEL_MOTION_APPEARANCE_files/image010.jpg
“Removed 8/18(2004) returned to parents. Court has removed K ?????
[stricken though, looks like it starts with the letter “K”]
has begin [sic] back to Mrs. Anderson.”
“PHYSICALEXAMINATION:
”URE
”BONE (or “Bows”)
”M…(unreadable) Vulvitis”
The medical evidence demonstrates that yet another child in the “care”
of ANNETTE ANDERSON has genital inflammation/injury problems.
That’s four different children with 4 different genital injuries
needing medical care, in the “care” of ANNETTE ANDERSON. The fifth
child injured/frightened by ANNETTE ANDERSON’S physical violence is
KIMBERLY GOSSELIN, as reported previously, and as in Evidence in this
case.
11) MEREDITH INKEL further relies upon, among other things, that both
GROTON, CT-based ATTORNEY VALERIE ALEXANDER and DEPARTMENT of CHILDREN
and FAMILIES’ (DCF’s) employee, JO-EL SUROVIAK refused to interview
the children regarding said statements of deliberate physical, sexual,
and emotional injury even though these persons were in the presence of
the children, when the children made these statements about PLAINTIFF
ANDERSON’S abuses to them. This is stated as fact by MEREDITH INKEL
in the online video interview of the INKEL FAMILY made June18, 2006,
Father’s Day (video file including this testimony autoplays from
KATHLEEN DICKSON’S website, Action Lyme.org, and is already in
Evidence in this case, on disk):
http://www.actionlyme.org/CRIMES_OF_CORRUPTICUT.htm and is
downloadable as:
http://www.actionlyme.org/INKEL_ABUSE_FILE_RENDERED_31_JULY_06_2.wmv
12) DCF employee LUCAS DANIELS, MEREDITH INKEL, and PHILIP INKEL
observed ANDREW INKEL as having a severe injury to his penis,
untreated and causing ANDREW pain and illness (fever). The penis
injury caused ANDREW pain and difficulty when urinating.
DCF employee LUCAS DANIELS and ____________ were aware of the serious
injuries to ANDREW INKEL’S penis at the time that it happened, when
the wound was observable, and when ANDREW had a fever from this
infection.
13) MEREDITH and PHILIP INKEL had observed puncture and scratch wounds
behind the ears made by fingernails to ANDREW INKEL, while in the
“care” of ANNETTE ANDERSON.
14) MEREDITH and PHILIP INKEL observed a long scab along the length of
ANDREW INKEL’S spine reported by ALEXANDER and ANDREW INKEL to be
caused by ANNETTE ANDERSON dragging ANDREW INKEL down a set of stairs
leading to a basement or downstairs or some other place of
punishment. See Item #15,next.
15) MISTAKEN IDENTITY RUSE #2:
Black and blue marks running down ANDREW INKEL’S spine were observed
by his biological parents at a “HOME VISIT? LIBRARY???, When the
NEW LONDON POLICE and DCF investigated, said investigators and ANNETTE
ANDERSON `falsely observed and reported ALEXANDER as ANDREW. ALEXANDER
does have a birthmark on his back. ANDREW does not. ANNETTE ANDERSON
reported that said black and blue injuries were not, in fact,observed,
and that “ANDREW,” instead, had “a birth mark,” when ALEXANDER had the
birthmark and the real ANDREW had the bruises down his spine.
16) The INKEL CHILDREN also reported to their parents (and KATHLEEN
DICKSON)other examples of emotional and verbal abuse by ANNETTE
ANDERSON to ALEXANDER,ANDREW and ANASTASIA - harsh and mean and cruel
punishments, refusing to provide a toilet, refusing to properly
nourish and bathe, etc. Specifically, the CHILDREN reported to their
parents that ANNETTE ANDERSON told the children that their “parents
were bad people,” that their “Mommy doesn’t love you,” that MEREDITH
INKEL was “not your Mommy,” and that she, ANNETTE ANDERSON, was their
Mommy.
The INKEL BOYS, ALEXANDER and ANDREW children reported being terrified
of ANNETTE ANDERSON – terrified of making ANDERSON angry.
17) Yet a fifth child, named KIMBERLY GOSSELIN reported to her
“counselor,” “AMY SIZER” (“CHILD and FAMILY AGENCY,” NEW LONDON, CT)
that ANNETTE ANDERSON brutalized her in the summer of 2004. The DCF
record of the call reads:
“Caller met with Kimberly for an individual therapy session this
morning. Kimberly said she urinated in her pull-up this morning and
the foster mother yelled at her. Caller said Kimberly has an ongoing
issue with bed wetting which is being addressed.
”Kimberly told caller [AMY SIZER] that the foster mother [ANDERSON]
has been smacking her in the head with an open hand. No marks or
bruises. Kimberly told caller that foster mother does spank her on the
behind. Kimberly said she is afraid of the foster mother when she gets
angry. Kimberly had some fears returning to her foster home.
”Kimberly told caller she had lobster for dinner and threw it into the
garbage. The foster mother took the lobster out of the garbage and
made her eat it. No other specifics of the incident unknown [sic].
”Caller had her supervisor speak to Kimberly. Kimberly could not
recall the last incident of foster mother hitting her. The foster
mother does not threaten to harm Kimberly today. Kimberly was sent
home with the foster mother. The foster mother is sometimes moody but
she did not appear angry with Kimberly today….”
The information contained in the body of this complaint demonstrates
that that the Movants named have interest deeply rooted in the above
captioned matter and definitely adverse to the plaintiff. Therefore
pursuant to the aforementioned statutes and the rule of law the
Movants respectfully motion the court for an order making the Movants
parties in this matter and to allow them to serve upon ANNETTE
ANDERSON complaint and summons consistent with the information
contained in this motion.
BY PHILLIP H INKEL ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL MOVANTS NAMED HEREIN
BY RIGHT.
PHILLIP H INKEL
259 INJUN HOLLW ROAD
HADDAM NECK, CONNECTICUT
06424
860 301 4461
inkel...@gmail.com
WHEREFORE THE COURT HAVING HEARD THIS MOTION HEREBY
DENIES
GRANTS
JUDGE
DATE
CERTIFICATION: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THIS MOTION WAS
Faxed OR MAILED on NOVEMBER 17, 2011 TO ALL PARTIES OF RECORD
Superior Court
70 Huntington Street,
New London, CT
Fax 860-442-7703
Kenneth A. Leary
165 State Street, Suite 405
New London, CT 06320
Fax 860-444-6879
Attorney for Plaintiff
Certified Mail
---------------------------------------------------PhilipInkel
259 INJUN HOLLOW ROAD
HADDAM NECK, CT, 06424
TELEPHONE 860 301 4461
KMDickson
margaret...@fda.hhs.gov, dwh...@forbes.com,
ca...@drcarolgoodheart.com, lPick...@cdc.gov, Durlan...@yale.edu,
Aa...@columbia.edu, gary_w...@nymc.edu,
scientifi...@ostp.gov, pkru...@princeton.edu,
Stanle...@fiu.edu, margaret...@hhs.fds.gov,
emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@ct.gov, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@ct.gov, kur...@washpost.com, georg...@washpost.com,
p...@allegorypress.com, commissi...@po.state.ct.us,
brans...@comcast.net, vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us,
freet...@charter.net, scott....@po.state.ct.us,
govern...@po.state.ct.us, attorney...@ct.gov,
randall...@usdoj.gov, Robert....@yale.edu, editor@greenwich-
post.com, harol...@yale.edu, sedm...@nswbc.org, rrmcg...@aol.com,
fr...@nytimes.com, saint....@sbcglobal.net
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com,
rast...@aol.com, billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com,
rjmu...@aol.com, paulcrai...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, richar...@yale.edu,
harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu, inq...@aldf.com,
ly...@idsociety.org, meganm...@theatlantic.com
Subject: Sexual / Physical / Emotional Abuse in "Foster Care"
"News" (Courant)
Date: Dec 3, 2011 5:36 AM
Well, well, well. It finally comes out.
http://www.actionlyme.org
http://www.courant.com/community/glastonbury/hc-ap-ct-adoptiveparents-adec01,0,479829.story
and
http://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-glastonbury-abuse-1203-20111202,0,6033880.story
The lawsuit against me for reporting multiple lines of evidence of
abuse against multiple children in foster care in New London, CT (the
children reported it to me, and then I got my video camera, so please
see the testimony of the children, here) which the New London Police
and DCF refused to investigate in 2006:
http://www.actionlyme.org/andersonpenisbiter.htm
The woman/abuser/foster "carer" lost her house and filed for
bankruptcy because DCF no longer provided her with pediatric bodies to
feed the mortgage company.
http://www.actionlyme.org/110504_PENISBITER_MOTION.htm
But they did not formally prosecute her.
Why?
Because they knew about it. The DCF deliberately lied in court and
blamed the injuries on the real mother in "court," knowing the
children were with this abuser, Annette Anderson, for 11 days by the
time the babies were brought to the doctor (Dr. Dennis Long, "Gales
Ferry, CT, Pediatrics").
CT Assistant Attorney General William Wholean ("prosecutor")
orchestrated the perjury with this foster abuser, Anderson, such that
the genital injuries were blamed on the biological mother. But the
children were with the foster abuser (who sued me for reporting her to
the authorities) for the preceding 11 days.
The father of the abused children has filed a motion to be a party to
the case.
http://www.actionlyme.org/111117_ANDERSON_INKEL_MOTION.html or
(UPDATE to the penisbiter's lawsuit against me for reporting her
penisbiting to police and DCF, Nov 20, 2011; Motion to countersue
Annette Anderson by the Inkel Family is copied in below.)
The Child Protective Services is a totally "political" (means "secret,
criminal") organization like the Food and Drug Administration and the
National Institutes of Health. They do nothing based on facts or
merit. It's all for show, and it's all about themselves.
They only make a big ta-do in the press when they get caught.
Now would be a good time to brush up on your spiritual training
because you'd have to wonder how the hell such crime and debauchery as
the illegal Iraq/Oil wars, the fake federal "judges" Mukasy and John
M. Walker of the Walker-Bush Family of Killingworth, CT,
http://www.actionlyme.org/LYME_CORRUPTICUT.htm
the Israelis infiltrating Yale (How Private Warmongers and the US
Military Infiltrated American Universities | Truthout
http://www.truth-out.org/how-private-warmongers-and-us-military-infiltrated-american-universities/1321396333
) thinking up stupidiological ideas like "Lyme is a bad knee" and
"Iraq will be throwing flowers and oil at us within 6 weeks of the
March 2003 invasion," ...
... the Yale psychiatric pervert agenda where "Sex Cures All
Diseases,... which are to be blamed on the victims in the first
place, ...
http://www.actionlyme.org/PHILLIPS_JE_PERVERT.htm
... the fake vaccine UConn/Yale tested out on Czech children guinea
pigs, were there were 22% "severe" adverse events, not to mention the
fact that there is none of Yale's LYMErix kind of Lyme in Europe
http://www.actionlyme.org/UCONNS_ABUSE_OF_CZECH_CHILDREN.htm
), ...
... and this pandemic kidnapping and kidnappee (and parent) abuses
could be taking place in one small place, Connecticut.
Read what one of its victims says about Life With DCF, recently:
"Carlos Harasz, a student at Central Connecticut State University,
said that he and his siblings were shuffled among foster families and
were suffering from ***"reactive attachment disorder," which is common
among children who have been passed from home to home or who have been
removed from their parents' homes.***
"***The condition can be lifelong,*** and its symptoms include
withdrawal, aggression, lying, stealing and pushing away adults who
attempt a lasting emotional connection.
"The allegations against Harasz and Wirth were directly attributable
to reactive attachment disorder, Carlos Harasz said.
"'When you go through foster care, you have a lot of issues,' he said.
'When you've been with 20 other families who've done you wrong,
***somebody has to take the blame.*** It doesn't have to be the people
who saved our lives.'"
From: http://www.courant.com/community/glastonbury/hc-glastonbury-abuse-1201-20111130,0,1281866.story
(The boy said that in defense of the sex-abuser foster parents, but
perhaps this one was too old to abuse at the time, in the foster-
abusers' minds.)
But, ...
...the "somebody who takes the blame" usually is the kids themselves
(and who are then drugged, since victim-blaming is what psychiatry
does with their "diagnoses,"
http://www.actionlyme.org/BRAINDAMAGE.htm
) but also the biological parents.
See in detail what kind of abuse the Inkel children had to suffer:
http://www.actionlyme.org/111117_ANDERSON_INKEL_MOTION.html
It's quite outrageous. From being forced to eat garbage to "Military
type stress positions" - a punishment ordered by the foster-carer's
alleged boyfriend...
This ▲ motion/report, above, by the biological parents is quite
graphic and details some of what took place over the long term, and
repeatedly.
And it was repeatedly covered up by a New London County, CT,
pediatrician who had to repeatedly treat the genital injuries to the
multiple children, but he never reported the abuser, Anderson, to the
DCF or the police.
This is how these things get out of hand. DCF repeatedly lies to
cover for itself, and they repeatedly blame the victims of their own
crimes. And that is exactly what Yale/UConn does re anything.
'Regarding any illness or condition, 'Regarding any health or life
matter.
'Regarding all human needs.
Why?
Connecticut is evil and stupid. The residents and the "State
employees" are greedy, stupid, and evil. There is no expertise, here,
in Connecticut, of any kind, and there is no "Justice Department"
representation by Uncle Washington Sam.
Connecticut citizens are the most insincere, phony, cynical, miserly
and greedy people in the world. Connecticut is the lead New World
Order state.
That means you will not find one decent lawyer or judge who performs
any work or action based on the situation's merit. It is as bad in
Connecticut - worse, because of the Gestapo/KGB's per capita density
in Connecticut - as it ever was in Stalin's Russia or NAZI Germany.
Mr. Richard Blumenthal went to Washington and we never heard from him
again.
111203, kmdickson
------------------------
http://www.actionlyme.org/111117_ANDERSON_INKEL_MOTION.html
Docket Nos. KNL-CV-08-5008286S
ANDERSON, ANNETTE vs. DICKSON,KATHLEEN
CONNECTICUT SUPERIOR COURT
70 Huntington Street
New London, CT
KNL-CV-08-5008286S
and
KNL-CV09-6001587S
NOVEMBER, 17, 2011
MOTION BY AN INTERESTED NON PARTY TO BECOME APARTY.
The Movants PHILIP INKEL, et aL, respectfully move the court for an
order to allow the NON PARTY MOVANTS NAMED HEREIN to be made parties
in the above captioned matter as Plaintiffs pursuant to C. G. S.
52-102 and 52-101. Movants have interest intimately related to the
nature of this case.
The facts described herein are relied upon by Movants to join this
Action.
1) ANNETTE ANDERSON through her ATTORNEY KENNETH LEARY have
brought about this action in the CONNECTICUT Superior Court against
KATHLEEN DICKSON, suing for defamation of character, accusing KATHLEEN
DICKSON of falsely and publically stating to the world via the
internet and other communication devices that ANNETTE ANDERSON working
on behalf of a corrupt and unlawful administration of Connecticut
State government engaged in dishonesty, perjury, and multiple acts of
child abuse, child battery, and sexual offenses to children.
In addition, Kathleen Dixon publically states ANNETTE ANDERSON is
accused of conspiring with said corrupt administration and ASSISTANT
ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM WHOLEAN, ATTORNEY VALERIE ALEXANDER,
ATTORNEY KENNETH LEARY, and JUDGE STUART DAVID BEAR, JUDGE CARL
TAYLOR the defraud the Connecticut Superior Court and the U.S.Court,
District of Connecticut, in various cases regarding the MOVANTS in
those courts in order to obstruct justice and to protect a
racketeering enterprise.
Specifically, said perpetrators participated in a scheme to obstruct
justice in this matter to cover up said abuses and other crimes and
unlawful conduct engaged in by the said perpetrators and other persons
working on behalf of said governing authority by engaging in practices
of administrating dishonesty in governmental and judicial services.
Said individuals have all collectively and individually prepared false
governmental and judicial documentation and have applied them to the
public record and governmental work products as they relateto this
case. Said individuals have further conspired to obstruct state and
federal justice and to violate the STATE OF CONNECTICUT’S mandatory
reporting of suspected child abuse laws.
2) ANNETTE ANDERSON seeks an order silencing KATHLEEN
DICKSON from further disseminating said speech to any other personsand
entities and to take from her compensation for unspecified claimed
damages.
2) PHILIP INKEL and MEREDITH INKEL are the parents of minor children
ALEXANDER, ANDREW, and ANASTASIA INKEL.
3) Specifically, REGARDING CHILD ABUSE, ANNETTE ANDERSON claims that
KATHLEEN DICKSON did falsely broadcast to the world population that,
inter alia, ANNETTE ANDERSON with the knowledge and consent of the
aforementioned persons and entities did cruelly,
physically,emotionally, sexually and violently did abuse, batter and
torture repetitively from Nov 3, 2003 to early August, 2004 ANASTASIA
INKEL. And then, from on or about October 6th, 2004 continuing to
approximately June, 2005 Annette Anderson did the same abuse again to
ALEXANDER, ANDREW, and ANASTASIA INKEL.
4) KATHLEEN DICKSON further reports and disseminates to the federal
and CONNECTICUT governments as well as the world population that
individuals employed in CONNECTICUT and UNITED STATES Government have
conspired to obstruct justice by concealing with ANNETTE ANDERSON the,
inter alia, said crimes against the STATE, ALEXANDER, ANDREW, and
ANASTASIA INKEL. Specifically she reports that Connecticut and Federal
administrators have failed to investigate, document, stop and
prosecute such offenses despite the facts of overwhelming evidence of
said crimes and continue to ignore and cover it up till time of this
writing.
5) MEREDITH INKEL, PHILLIP INKEL, ALEXANDER INKEL, ANDREW INKEL,
ANASTASIA INKEL have an interest adverse to ANNETTE ANDERSON in the
above matter in that ANNETTE ANDERSON DID ENGAGE IN THE AFOREMENTIONED
ACTS AND CONSPIRACIES and that she continues to conspire with
CONNECTICUT State employees to conceal said crimes.
6) MEREDITH and PHILIP INKEL also reasonably believe DR. DENNIS LONG
conspired with said party to conceal medical evidence of and the
existence of injuries and abuse of a serious nature to ALEXANDER,
ANDREW and ANASTASIA INKEL. ANASTASIA INKEL does not have
Neurofibromatosis or “café au lait” spots as claimed by DENNIS LONG.
Therefore the darkened tissue on ANASTASIA’S leg was probably a bruise
–consistent with the other bruises the children clearly acquired in
the “care”of ANNETTE ANDERSON. DENNIS LONG, MD., did not report to
“authorities” of any kind to our knowledge, that the INKEL CHILDREN
sustained genital injuries on 10/16/04 (ANASTASIA, who had been in
ANDERSON’S care for 10 or 11 days prior to this visit, having been
removed or kidnapped from the INKELS from the grounds of WATERFORD, CT
court house on or about 10/05/04).
7) In Evidence in this case[KNL-08-500868S], a photograph of ANDREW
INKEL’S black eye, obtained in ANNETTE ANDERSON’S “care”:
http://www.actionlyme.org/INKEL_MOTION_APPEARANCE_files/image008.jpg
8) For all relevant times andinstances, MERIDITH INKEL and PHILIP
INKEL rely upon medical reports of ALEXANDER, ANDREW and ANASTASIA
INKEL, each, of having facts that suggest sexual and physical abuse
occurred, and of ALEXANDER and ANDREW INKEL reporting verbally to
their parents on or about june 2004, that ANNETTE ANDERSON “bit”and
“pinched” their “peepees.” The following link is to the video of the
children giving this unsolicited testimony:
http://www.actionlyme.org/INKEL_ABUSE_FILE_RENDERED_31_JULY_06_2.wmv
9) ANNETTE ANDERSON and NANCY INKEL testified that ANASTASIA INKEL had
a severe diaper rash and both persons described it to be an untreated
“open and raw” wound from her vagina to her anus. All stated that
ANASTASIA INKEL was in a lot of pain as a result of the wound. The
wound as described was so severe and medically neglected that criminal
charges are and were required. DCF, said court officers and ANNETTE
ANDERSON conspired to attribute this “diaper rash” to MEREDITH
INKEL,however, ANASTASIA INKEL had been in the “care” of ANNETTE
ANDERSON for 10 or11 days prior to the office visit for treatment of
this genital wound as appears in the following link on DEFENDANT
DICKSON’S website:
http://www.actionlyme.org/INKEL_MOTION_APPEARANCE_files/image004.jpg
ANNETTE ANDERSON conspired with ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM
WHOLEAN,NANCY INKEL, and DCF employee JO-EL SUROVIAK to defraud the
court regarding this “diaper rash” incident.
10) MISTAKEN IDENTITY RUSE, #1:
Independently of all of this, ANNETTE ANDERSON brought another infant
to DR. DENNIS LONG on 8/30/04 who she claimed to be ANASTASIA INKEL
and who was not ANASTASIA INKEL, because ANASTASIA had been returned
to her biological parents, PHILIP and MEREDITH INKEL, before that date
(but removed again on or about 10/5/04), and unsurprisingly, this
unknown child,too, had genital injury/infection.
The doctor’s (DENNIS LONG) notesread:
http://www.actionlyme.org/INKEL_MOTION_APPEARANCE_files/image010.jpg
“Removed 8/18(2004) returned to parents. Court has removed K ?????
[stricken though, looks like it starts with the letter “K”]
has begin [sic] back to Mrs. Anderson.”
“PHYSICALEXAMINATION:
”URE
”BONE (or “Bows”)
”M…(unreadable) Vulvitis”
The medical evidence demonstrates that yet another child in the “care”
of ANNETTE ANDERSON has genital inflammation/injury problems.
That’s four different children with 4 different genital injuries
needing medical care, in the “care” of ANNETTE ANDERSON. The fifth
child injured/frightened by ANNETTE ANDERSON’S physical violence is
KIMBERLY GOSSELIN, as reported previously, and as in Evidence in this
case.
11) MEREDITH INKEL further relies upon, among other things, that both
GROTON, CT-based ATTORNEY VALERIE ALEXANDER and DEPARTMENT of CHILDREN
and FAMILIES’ (DCF’s) employee, JO-EL SUROVIAK refused to interview
the children regarding said statements of deliberate physical, sexual,
and emotional injury even though these persons were in the presence of
the children, when the children made these statements about PLAINTIFF
ANDERSON’S abuses to them. This is stated as fact by MEREDITH INKEL
in the online video interview of the INKEL FAMILY made June18, 2006,
Father’s Day (video file including this testimony autoplays from
KATHLEEN DICKSON’S website, Action Lyme.org, and is already in
Evidence in this case, on disk):
http://www.actionlyme.org/CRIMES_OF_CORRUPTICUT.htm and is
downloadable as:
http://www.actionlyme.org/INKEL_ABUSE_FILE_RENDERED_31_JULY_06_2.wmv
12) DCF employee LUCAS DANIELS, MEREDITH INKEL, and PHILIP INKEL
observed ANDREW INKEL as having a severe injury to his penis,
untreated and causing ANDREW pain and illness (fever). The penis
injury caused ANDREW pain and difficulty when urinating.
DCF employee LUCAS DANIELS and ____________ were aware of the serious
injuries to ANDREW INKEL’S penis at the time that it happened, when
the wound was observable, and when ANDREW had a fever from this
infection.
13) MEREDITH and PHILIP INKEL had observed puncture and scratch wounds
behind the ears made by fingernails to ANDREW INKEL, while in the
“care” of ANNETTE ANDERSON.
14) MEREDITH and PHILIP INKEL observed a long scab along the length of
ANDREW INKEL’S spine reported by ALEXANDER and ANDREW INKEL to be
caused by ANNETTE ANDERSON dragging ANDREW INKEL down a set of stairs
leading to a basement or downstairs or some other place of
punishment. See Item #15,next.
15) MISTAKEN IDENTITY RUSE #2:
Black and blue marks running down ANDREW INKEL’S spine were observed
by his biological parents at a “HOME VISIT? LIBRARY???, When the
NEW LONDON POLICE and DCF investigated, said investigators and ANNETTE
ANDERSON `falsely observed and reported ALEXANDER as ANDREW. ALEXANDER
does have a birthmark on his back. ANDREW does not. ANNETTE ANDERSON
reported that said black and blue injuries were not, in fact,observed,
and that “ANDREW,” instead, had “a birth mark,” when ALEXANDER had the
birthmark and the real ANDREW had the bruises down his spine.
16) The INKEL CHILDREN also reported to their parents (and KATHLEEN
DICKSON)other examples of emotional and verbal abuse by ANNETTE
ANDERSON to ALEXANDER,ANDREW and ANASTASIA - harsh and mean and cruel
punishments, refusing to provide a toilet, refusing to properly
nourish and bathe, etc. Specifically, the CHILDREN reported to their
parents that ANNETTE ANDERSON told the children that their “parents
were bad people,” that their “Mommy doesn’t love you,” that MEREDITH
INKEL was “not your Mommy,” and that she, ANNETTE ANDERSON, was their
Mommy.
The INKEL BOYS, ALEXANDER and ANDREW children reported being terrified
of ANNETTE ANDERSON – terrified of making ANDERSON angry.
17) Yet a fifth child, named KIMBERLY GOSSELIN reported to her
“counselor,” “AMY SIZER” (“CHILD and FAMILY AGENCY,” NEW LONDON, CT)
that ANNETTE ANDERSON brutalized her in the summer of 2004. The DCF
record of the call reads:
“Caller met with Kimberly for an individual therapy session this
morning. Kimberly said she urinated in her pull-up this morning and
the foster mother yelled at her. Caller said Kimberly has an ongoing
issue with bed wetting which is being addressed.
”Kimberly told caller [AMY SIZER] that the foster mother [ANDERSON]
has been smacking her in the head with an open hand. No marks or
bruises. Kimberly told caller that foster mother does spank her on the
behind. Kimberly said she is afraid of the foster mother when she gets
angry. Kimberly had some fears returning to her foster home.
”Kimberly told caller she had lobster for dinner and threw it into the
garbage. The foster mother took the lobster out of the garbage and
made her eat it. No other specifics of the incident unknown [sic].
”Caller had her supervisor speak to Kimberly. Kimberly could not
recall the last incident of foster mother hitting her. The foster
mother does not threaten to harm Kimberly today. Kimberly was sent
home with the foster mother. The foster mother is sometimes moody but
she did not appear angry with Kimberly today….”
The information contained in the body of this complaint demonstrates
that that the Movants named have interest deeply rooted in the above
captioned matter and definitely adverse to the plaintiff. Therefore
pursuant to the aforementioned statutes and the rule of law the
Movants respectfully motion the court for an order making the Movants
parties in this matter and to allow them to serve upon ANNETTE
ANDERSON complaint and summons consistent with the information
contained in this motion.
BY PHILLIP H INKEL ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL MOVANTS NAMED HEREIN
BY RIGHT.
PHILLIP H INKEL
259 INJUN HOLLW ROAD
HADDAM NECK, CONNECTICUT
06424
860 301 4461
inkel...@gmail.com
WHEREFORE THE COURT HAVING HEARD THIS MOTION HEREBY
DENIES
GRANTS
JUDGE
DATE
CERTIFICATION: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THIS MOTION WAS
Faxed OR MAILED on NOVEMBER 17, 2011 TO ALL PARTIES OF RECORD
Superior Court
70 Huntington Street,
New London, CT
Fax 860-442-7703
Kenneth A. Leary
165 State Street, Suite 405
New London, CT 06320
Fax 860-444-6879
Attorney for Plaintiff
Certified Mail
---------------------------------------------------PhilipInkel
259 INJUN HOLLOW ROAD
HADDAM NECK, CT, 06424
TELEPHONE 860 301 4461
KMDickson
0 new messages