No ("Is Anyone Telling Us The Truth?")
Mort Zuckerman
gary_w...@nymc.edu, scientifi...@ostp.gov,
pkru...@princeton.edu, Stanle...@fiu.edu,
emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com,
harol...@yale.edu, sedm...@nswbc.org, rrmcg...@aol.com,
fr...@nytimes.com, dpr...@stmartin.edu
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, richar...@yale.edu,
harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu, inq...@aldf.com,
ly...@idsociety.org, meganm...@theatlantic.com
Subject: No ("Is Anyone Telling Us The Truth?")
Date: Jan 8, 2010 9:00 AM
No.
There is only one truth and that
WTC7 fell at the acceleration due
to gravity is it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0GHVEKrhng
If the building fell due to the
pressure from one floor collapsing
upon another, it would not have fallen
at the acceleration due to gravity.
There was no resistance in the lower
floors because it had been removed
via controlled thermate demolition:
http://www.actionlyme.org/911_HOAX.htm
http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_apc.pdf
FEMA: There is no explanation for the sulphur. It could
have occurred as part of the process which initiated the
collapse. (See page 13, the conclusions).
This supports the assertion that thermate was used.
Add this data to the 47 floors in under 7 seconds
non-hypothesis (fact) that the WTC7 was pre-loaded
with explosives on 10 Sep 01.
That the "US Government" can't produce
any science surprises no one. The role
of the MSM is to motivate Americans to
do the Chicken Dance.
KMDickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
=============================
http://vdare.com/roberts/100107_truth.htm
January 07, 2010
Is Anyone Telling Us The Truth?
By Paul Craig Roberts
What are we to make of the failed Underwear Bomber plot, the
Toothpaste, Shampoo, and Bottled Water Bomber plot, and the Shoe
Bomber plot? These blundering and implausible plots to bring down an
airliner seem far removed from al-Qaida’s expertise in pulling off
9/11.
If we are to believe the U.S. government, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the
alleged al-Qaida "mastermind" behind 9/11, outwitted the CIA, the NSA,
indeed all 16 U.S. intelligence agencies as well as those of all U.S.
allies including Mossad, the National Security Council, NORAD, Air
Traffic Control, Airport Security four times on one morning, and Dick
Cheney, and with untrained and inexperienced pilots pulled off skilled
piloting feats of crashing hijacked airliners into the World Trade
Center towers, and the Pentagon, where a battery of state of the art
air defenses somehow failed to function.
After such amazing success, al-Qaida would have attracted the best
minds in the business, but, instead, it has been reduced to amateur
stunts.
The Underwear Bomb plot is being played to the hilt on the TV media
and especially on Fox "news." After reading recently that The
Washington Post allowed a lobbyist to write a news story that preached
the lobbyist’s interest, I wondered if the manufacturers of full body
scanners were behind the heavy coverage of the Underwear Bomber, if
not behind the plot itself. In America, everything is for sale.
Integrity is gone with the wind.
Recently I read a column by an author who has a "convenience theory"
about the Underwear Bomber being a Nigerian allegedly trained by al-
Qaida in Yemen. As the U.S. is involved in an undeclared war in
Yemen, about which neither the American public nor Congress were
informed or consulted, the Underwear Bomb plot provided a convenient
excuse for Washington’s new war, regardless of whether it was a real
attack or a put-up job.
Once you start to ask yourself about whose agenda is served by events
and their news spin, other things come to mind. For example, last
July there was a news report that the government in Yemen had
disbanded a terrorist cell, which was operating under the supervision
of Israeli intelligence services. According to the news report, Yemeni
President Ali Abdullah Saleh told Saba news agency that a terrorist
cell was arrested and that the case was referred to judicial
authorities "for its links with the Israeli intelligence services."
Could the Underwear Bomber have been one of the Israeli terrorist
recruits? Certainly Israel has an interest in keeping the US fully
engaged militarily against all potential foes of Israel’s territorial
expansion.
The thought brought back memory of my Russian studies at Oxford
University where I learned that the Tsar’s secret police set off bombs
so that they could blame those whom they wanted to arrest.
I next remembered that Francesco Cossiga, the president of Italy from
1985-1992, revealed the existence of Operation Gladio, a false flag
operation under NATO auspices that carried out bombings across Europe
in the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s. The bombings were blamed on
communists and were used to discredit communist parties in elections.
An Italian parliamentary investigation unearthed the fact that the
attacks were overseen by the CIA. Gladio agent Vincenzo Vinciguerra
stated in sworn testimony that the attacks targeted innocent
civilians, including women and children, in order "to force the public
to turn to the state to ask for greater security."
What a coincidence. That is exactly what 9/11 succeeded in
accomplishing in the U.S.
Among the well-meaning and the gullible in the West, the supposition
still exists that government represents the public interest.
Political parties keep this myth alive by fighting over which party
best represents the public’s interest. In truth, government
represents private interests, those of the office holders themselves
and those of the lobby groups that finance their political campaigns.
The public is in the dark as to the real agendas.
The U.S. and its puppet state allies were led to war in the Middle
East and Afghanistan entirely on the basis of lies and deception.
Iraqi weapons of mass destruction did not exist and were known by the
U.S. and British governments not to exist. Forged documents, such as
the "yellowcake documents," were leaked to newspapers in order to
create news reporting that would bring the public along with the
government’s war agenda.
Now the same thing is happening in regard to the nonexistent Iranian
nuclear weapons program. Forged documents leaked to The Times
(London) that indicated Iran was developing a "nuclear trigger"
mechanism have been revealed as forgeries.
Who benefits? Clearly, attacking Iran is on the Israeli-U.S. agenda,
and someone is creating the "evidence" to support the case, just as
the leaked secret “Downing Street Memo” to the British cabinet
informed Prime Minister Tony Blair’s government that President Bush
had already made the decision to invade Iraq and "the intelligence and
facts were being fixed around the policy."
The willingness of people to believe their rulers and the propaganda
ministries that serve the rulers is astonishing. Many Americans
believe Iran has a nuclear weapons program despite the unanimous
conclusion of 16 U.S. intelligence agencies to the contrary.
Vice President Dick Cheney and the neoconservatives fought hard with
limited success to change the CIA’s role from intelligence agency to a
political agency that manufactures facts in support of the
neoconservative agenda. For the Bush Regime creating “new realities”
was more important than knowing the facts.
Recently I read a proposal from a person purporting to favor an
independent media that stated that we must save the print media from
financial failure with government subsidies. Such a subsidy would
complete the subservience of the media to government.
Even in Stalinist Russia, a totalitarian political system where
everyone knew that there was no free press, a gullible or intimidated
public and Communist Party enabled Joseph Stalin to put the heroes of
the Bolshevik Revolution on show trial and execute them as capitalist
spies.
In the U.S. we are developing our own show trials. Sheikh Mohammed’s
will be a big one. As Chris Hedges recently pointed out, once
government uses demonized Muslims to get the new justice (sic) system
going, the rest of us will be next.
Paul Craig Roberts [email him] was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury
during President Reagan’s first term. He was Associate Editor of the
Wall Street Journal. He has held numerous academic appointments,
including the William E. Simon Chair, Center for Strategic and
International Studies, Georgetown University, and Senior Research
Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University. He was awarded the
Legion of Honor by French President Francois Mitterrand. He is the
author of Supply-Side Revolution : An Insider's Account of
Policymaking in Washington; Alienation and the Soviet Economy and
Meltdown: Inside the Soviet Economy, and is the co-author with
Lawrence M. Stratton of The Tyranny of Good Intentions : How
Prosecutors and Bureaucrats Are Trampling the Constitution in the Name
of Justice. Click here for Peter Brimelow’s Forbes Magazine interview
with Roberts about the recent epidemic of prosecutorial misconduct.
"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci