Amero-izing the Debt
Mort Zuckerman
scientifi...@ostp.gov, pkru...@princeton.edu,
Stanle...@fiu.edu, emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com,
harol...@yale.edu, sedm...@nswbc.org, rrmcg...@aol.com,
fr...@nytimes.com, dpr...@stmartin.edu
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, richar...@yale.edu,
harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu, inq...@aldf.com,
ly...@idsociety.org, meganm...@theatlantic.com
Subject: Amero-izing the Debt
Date: Nov 18, 2009 3:42 AM
ARTICLE BELOW
=====================
Okay.
I *got* it:
There had to all along have been an ActionPlan
and a contingency plan for the failed Israeli-
Pipeliners Wars, should the rest of the world
really dump the dollar and/or should America
decide they/we were never repaying their/our
debts. We simply adopt a new currency called
the Amero to go along with NAFTA. NAFTA would
be the New EU.
[There has to be a NAFTA, because as Henry
Kissinger sez, "Who ya gonna call?" when you
want to execute a global order?]
If there is an EU and an Mexamericanada, then
Mexamericanadian Banksters in cahoots with the
British-Israeli EU Banksters could maintain
itself with Mexi-slave labor and Canadian
resources, at least for a while.
So far, Canada is doing whatever Uncle Sam
and Mother Britain wishes of it. Mexico
has its instability maintained for it via
the CIA drug trade.
- - - - - - - -
ASIDE: "Drugs are good because 1) they put black
people in jail where they are less likely to
procreate; See Psychiatry, British, MKUltra:
http://www.actionlyme.org/BRITISH_PSYCHIATRY.htm
for more about putting 90% of all US abortion clinics
in black neighborhoods, and the AEI as re Custodial
Democracy, and 2) Stupid White People have to
have jobs, like jail guards:
http://www.aei.org/book/445
'Appendix 1: Statistics for People Who Are Sure
They Can't Learn Statistics'
"And just nevermind about White People Who *Can*
Actually Read, but don't understand statistics
or how one qualifies data. We have an appendix
for that."
- - - - - - - - - -
The alternative is for Americans to take
care of themselves! But then what does
that mean? It equates to the dangerous
scenario of autodetermination or democracy!
What would happen to all the rich people?
How would the Corporate Bigs continue to
pollute the planet but also continue to blame
global warming on poor people? The Useless
Eaters? The Overpopulated Dark People regions
of earth? !!
What if *THEY* got educated with their
natural resources wealth and decided to
do what we've done?
What would happen if - God Forbid - the
Chinese got their hands on Arab or African
resources? They're Communists!
And we know what Communists do to rich
people and the self-elected aristocracy...
The Communists take it *all* and enslave
people!
And they have no respect for life!!
Imagine what they would do to the likes
of weak-but-resource-wealthy countries,
like Iraq or Afghanistan if they got the
chance?
That's why we have to have new rules
for Canada and Mexico. In between are
the Americans but they're weak-willed
and slovenly. They'll go along with
anything.
So far, Americans haven't successfully
objected to the Whitie-tard Jailer-Jobs
(thanks also to the Racist Evangelitards;
the Mormons/Masons who believe black people
descended from Cain and are therefore
being punished by God - God made em all
stupid) and What-To-Do-with-the-Inferiors
like Dark-People-Breeders (Keep them off
the streets- help them with the CIA drug-
running).
And so far, Americans haven't successfully
objected to the fake "terror" wars.
- - - - - -
ASIDE: Now what if America really
had been a democracy all along? What
if the people had maintained access to
the press or the MSM? What would it
have evolved into, had we the people
maintained control of our country,
instead of all of the insanity we've
been dealt the past 30 years?
There would have been a lot more - to
borrow a David Brooksism - innovation.
It would have taken the *courage* to
face our own problems. But courage is
not what we learned. What we learned
was this:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/17/opinion/17brooks.html
"Don't do a damned thing for anyone else.
You don't want to become someone's
PATSY!!"
KMDickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
============================
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_5278.shtml
The US needs to be censured for its immoral behavior
By Paul Craig Roberts
Online Journal Contributing Writer
Nov 18, 2009, 00:17
Email this article
Printer friendly page
It is conventional wisdom that it was the draft that ended the Vietnam
war. According to this explanation, cowardly college students subject
to the draft and their unpatriotic families, forced an end to the war.
This is Karl Marx’s explanation. Material interests, not empty
morality, are said to have brought the war to an end.
That fact that in those days the US still had an independent media of
sorts that sometimes framed the war in moral terms is ignored. Are we
sure, for example, that the film of the naked little girl running in
terror down the road burning with napalm was ineffectual in arousing
moral opposition to the war? Are we certain that it wasn’t an aroused
moral conscience that brought about the end of the war but was college
students’ fears for their lives and limbs?
If we ascribe ending the war to material interests, it makes ending
the war look as unworthy as the war itself.
Yet, virtually every conservative columnist, commentator, newsperson
and politician, as well as today’s antiwar protesters and apparently
the Pentagon, believes that a military draft would reduce Americans’
toleration for wars because of body bags coming home to middle and
upper class parents. Apparently, the lower class doesn’t mind its kids
coming back in body bags.
Those in thrall to this explanation, which derives from Marx’s
materialist explanation of history, do not notice that Vietnam was our
longest war. It apparently took almost forever for the material
interest of students and their parents to realize itself and stop the
war.
Why are we afraid to say that the war stopped because American troops
and the American population got tired, offended even, from killing
women, children and noncombatants? Vietnam had not attacked the US.
The US had interjected itself into a civil war in a far off place, as
it has done in Afghanistan.
By invading Iraq the US started a civil war between Sunni and Shi’ite.
In Pakistan the US has started a civil war between the religious
tribal population and the secular US puppet state. In Palestine the US
started a civil war between Fatah and Hamas.
One continuously reads from those Americans opposed to America’s wars
of aggression that the wars are possible because they don’t affect
Americans, just those few who sign up for the voluntary military.
Thus, there are insufficient material interests at stake to stop the
war. This is a common explanation for the weakness of the antiwar
movement.
One could argue instead that it is the triumph of Karl Marx’s
materialist thinking that has made moral protests impotent. What is
morality? You can’t weigh it, define it, measure it. It can be
dismissed as the whining of material interests. In contrast, material
interests, such as lives, limbs, and bank accounts are real.
For whatever the reason, morality has shown itself to be an impotent
force in 21st century America. Americans show no remorse at over one
million dead Iraqis and 4 million displaced Iraqis due entirely to an
American invasion based on lies and deception. The lies and deception
are now well proven. Yet, there has been no apology for the horrors
that Americans inflicted on Iraq.
Afghanistan is another example. Intentional lies conflated the Taliban
with al Qaeda and “terrorists.” The diverse peoples in Afghanistan who
were first ravaged by Soviet bombs are now ravaged by American bombs.
Weddings, funerals, children’s soccer games, people waiting for fuel
or food, people asleep in their homes, people attending Mosques have
all been murdered and are murdered routinely by US and its NATO
puppets.
Each time civilians are murdered, the US denies it, only to be
contradicted every time by the evidence.
Why is the president of the United States contemplating sending yet
tens of thousands more US troops to kill people in Afghanistan?
The answer is that the United States is an immoral country, with an
immoral people and an immoral government. Americans no longer have a
moral conscience. They have gone over to the Dark Side.
Humanity has endeavored for millennia to control evil with morality.
In the American “superpower,” this effort has collapsed and failed.
The United States needs to be censured for its immoral behavior, not
have that behavior rationalized as being in its material interests.
Paul Craig Roberts [email him] was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury
during President Reagan’s first term. He was Associate Editor of the
Wall Street Journal. He has held numerous academic appointments,
including the William E. Simon Chair, Center for Strategic and
International Studies, Georgetown University, and Senior Research
Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University. He was awarded the
Legion of Honor by French President Francois Mitterrand. He is the
author of Supply-Side Revolution : An Insider’s Account of
Policymaking in Washington; Alienation and the Soviet Economy and
Meltdown: Inside the Soviet Economy, and is the co-author with
Lawrence M. Stratton of The Tyranny of Good Intentions : How
Prosecutors and Bureaucrats Are Trampling the Constitution in the Name
of Justice. Click here for Peter Brimelow’s Forbes Magazine interview
with Roberts about the recent epidemic of prosecutorial misconduct.
Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor
Top of Page
"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci