Yes, "Federal Officials" "are above the law," especially "judges."
Mort Zuckerman
Durlan...@yale.edu, Aa...@columbia.edu, gary_w...@nymc.edu,
scientifi...@ostp.gov, pkru...@princeton.edu,
Stanle...@fiu.edu, emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com,
harol...@yale.edu, sedm...@nswbc.org, rrmcg...@aol.com,
fr...@nytimes.com, dpr...@stmartin.edu
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, criminal...@usdoj.gov,
karla.d...@usdoj.gov, christophe...@usdoj.gov,
richar...@yale.edu, harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu,
inq...@aldf.com, ly...@idsociety.org, meganm...@theatlantic.com
Subject: Yes, "Federal Officials" "are above the law," especially
"judges."
Date: Apr 5, 2010 8:46 AM
ARTICLE BELOW
===================================
Yes. That is the point of having
"federal officials."
Their purpose is: "To Protect and
Defend US Multinational Lawbreakers":
http://www.actionlyme.org/090228.htm
The result is lost innovation, discovery,
intelligence and in essence, US Commerce
http://www.actionlyme.org/080430_RICO_CABAL_CAVES.htm
BLUMENTHAL:
"The IDSA's 2006 Lyme disease guideline panel undercut its credibility
by allowing individuals with financial interests -- in drug companies,
Lyme disease diagnostic tests, patents and consulting arrangements
with insurance companies -- to exclude divergent medical evidence and
opinion. In today's healthcare system, clinical practice guidelines
have tremendous influence on the marketing of medical services and
products, insurance reimbursements and treatment decisions. As a
result, medical societies that publish such guidelines have a legal
and moral duty to use exacting safeguards and scientific standards.
- - -
That's why CT "judges" don't know the
first thing about the law, and many have
never even set foot in a Corrupticourt,
much less tried a case in one.
This is true testimony from the Corrupticut
Legislators' March 2006 Judge Approval
Hearings:
"DO YOU HAVE ZERO EXPERIENCE WITH
THE CORRUPTICOURTS?"
"YES"
"YOU'RE HIRED!!"
http://www.actionlyme.org/VIKING_INTERVIEWS.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/080924.htm
("Whereupon... we shut off the tape
recorder."
In this way, for instance, in the
instances where vaccines cause intracranial
hemorrhage ("Shaken Baby"), the CEOs can
tell the judges: "The Following Evidence
Will Not Be Allowed..."
http://www.actionlyme.org/index.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/BRAINDAMAGE.htm
To our knowledge, they're all also
Peniologists, like psychiatry (Masons):
"You jerk me off, I'll jerk you":
http://www.actionlyme.org/EXORCISMS.htm
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2748614967389038944#
◄ "Most 'judges' and Mormons are Penis-Loving
Freemasons"- Bill Schnoebelen
http://www.viddler.com/explore/babylonfalling/videos/14/
"Freemasons worship penises" - Doc Marquis.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAsmyQk3P3c
"Freemasons worship sex/penises" - Leo Zagami.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANooGJj6Ng8&feature=related
"Freemasons are the only enemies of the Catholic Church and
are behind the Vatican II Corruption Conspiracy"
- Fr. Malachi Martin
http://www.viddler.com/explore/babylonfalling/videos/15/
"Freemasons/Illuminati wants a world religion where we all worship
Lucifer, as do the Freemasons"- Doc Maquis.
- - - -
It's *like* that. It's a *real* circle
jerk, like Bohomian Grove. That's why
the self-alleged courts still allow
the crazies who call themselves brain
experts, psychiatry, to get up there in
the nitwitness box and say things like
http://www.actionlyme.org/andersonpenisbiter.htm
"Andrea Yates watched an episode of
Law and Order..." that not only did not
exist, but was never even conceived by
the producers,... and not be called
"psychotic" himself, for making up his own
BS and then convincing himself it was true.
For another instance, the real disease
that Yale does not want discovered is
Post-LYMErix-Syndrome, despite the fact
that the entire rest of the scientific
world is taking that data and running
wid it to the US and European Patent
Databases, faster than anyone can say,
"fung..."
Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
==========================================
http://www.fff.org/blog/jghblog2010-04-02.asp
Are Federal Officials Above the Law?
by Jacob G. Hornberger
A federal judge’s ruling in a case challenging the Bush
administration’s infamous and illegal domestic surveillance case will
likely demonstrate, once again, the hypocrisy and deceit of Barack
Obama and his merry band of liberal statists.
When Obama was a presidential candidate, he emphasized to American
voters that President Bush’s warrantless surveillance of Americans was
“unconstitutional and illegal.”
But once Obama got into office, he silenced his tune, especially in
lawsuits that were brought by victims of this criminal action. Like
Bush’s Justice Department, Obama’s Justice Department took the
position that people’s lawsuits should be dismissed on grounds of
“national security” because, they said, if such cases were allowed to
proceed, national-security secrets would be revealed.
Yeah, such secrets as the identities of federal agents who violated
federal criminal statutes as well as the identities of the federal
higher-ups who ordered them to do so! Can’t you just see the entire
nation collapsing if information like that were to be disclosed to the
public?
How convenient is that? All one has to do to protect federal criminals
is simply cite the magic term “national security” and all the criminal
dirt is swept under the carpet. Too bad Richard Nixon and the other
Watergate conspirators didn’t claim “national security” to keep their
criminal wrongdoing secret. Or did they?
In any event, this week a federal judge in one of the surveillance
cases declared Bush’s surveillance scheme unlawful, a ruling that
places Barack Obama and his Justice Department in an interesting
position.
Do they let the ruling stand? Doing so would be consistent with
Obama’s campaign position, which mirrored that of the judge.
Or do they appeal the ruling, thereby exposing, once again, the rank
hypocrisy of the Obama administration?
Of course, all this is occurring in the context of a civil suit. The
question with respect to the criminal-justice system is: Why isn’t the
Justice Department securing federal grand-jury indictments against
federal officials who, everyone concedes, violated federal criminal
statutes?
After all, the Justice Department is always overeager to enforce such
stupid laws as antitrust, insider-trading, and possession and
distribution of illicit drugs against the American people. Why do
federal officials who committed felonies with an illegal surveillance
program get a pass? Are federal officials considered better than
ordinary Americans?
For once, the Obama administration should do the right thing. Not only
should it not appeal the adverse ruling in the surveillance case, it
should also take the side of all other victims of such illegal
conduct, arguing that they are entitled to full relief in the courts.
If Bush, Cheney, and any their cronies wish to intervene in such suits
to defend their illegal scheme, so be it, but this would be a good
place for Obama to finally begin breaking away from Bush’s massive
infringements on civil liberties.
Equally important, Obama’s Justice Department should initiate a
federal grand jury investigation into the entire illegal surveillance
scheme, subpoenaing all the records of those who committed the
offenses and all the records showing who was victimized. Grand jury
indictments and federal criminal prosecutions should ensue. What
better opportunity to show that no one, not even powerful and
influential federal officials, is above the law?
Jacob Hornberger is founder and president of The Future of Freedom
Foundation. Send him email.
"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci