Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

When Ya Have National Security Secrets (Disease)...

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Mort Zuckerman

unread,
Mar 13, 2009, 1:20:21 AM3/13/09
to
To: emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, the-...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com,
for...@nytimes.com, nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov,
brigidc...@optonline.net, tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com,
jle...@courant.com, tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org,
thomas...@usdoj.gov, thoma...@po.state.ct.us,
kur...@washpost.com, georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, richar...@yale.edu,
harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu, inq...@aldf.com,
ly...@idsociety.org

Subject: When Ya Have National Security Secrets (Disease)...

Date: Mar 13, 2009 1:16 AM

ARTICLE BELOW
=================================


Dave Persing gets an "NIH Biodefense" contract
for lying about what he knew about OspA
and LYMErix vaccine failure:
http://www.actionlyme.org/EMBASSIES_CORIXA_TLR_13_JULY_06.htm


http://patft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6045804.PN.&OS=PN/6045804&RS=PN/6045804

"Additional uncertainty may arise if the vaccines are not completely
protective; vaccinated patients with multisystem complaints
characteristic of ****later presentations of Lyme disease may be
difficult to distinguish from patients with vaccine failure.****
Vaccine failures have been occasionally noted in animal models (E.
Fikrig et al., Science, 250, 553-6 (1990)), and infection with
antigenically variant strains of B. burgdorferi, which are being
increasingly documented in the U.S., might still occur."


http://www.actionlyme.org/DICKSON_FDA_SUBMISSION.htm
(^^see that Persing published that he knew Western Blots
were unreadable in OspA-vaccinated people - 3 times)


Then his company was sold to SmithKline, a UK company.

So, did SmithKline get the insider info with the "NIH Biodefense
contract?"

And who gave Corixa the contract?

- - - - -

I was wondering, too, can a person catch
Israeli "race-specific bioweapons" PNAC-itis?
http://www.actionlyme.org/PNAC.pdf
(page 60)

I was wondering, because you know, about all
that Russian brain-scramble going on over
at New York Medical College wid da "non-intracellular
intracellular spirochetes:"
http://www.actionlyme.org/BOGUS_RUSSIAN_NYMC_ARTICLES.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/TREPONEMA_PERMANENT.htm
and on the other side of me, Boston, that kinda Mark
Klempner-Paranoid-Dementia on the other:
http://www.actionlyme.org/MarkKlempner_Fibroblasts.htm
with *HIS* "intracellular spirochetes," but also, all of
his crazy talk about "bullet proof vests" and
bad, bad autoreactive T cells that became autoreactive
against Myelin Oligodendrocyte Basic Protein from OspA,
LYMErix:
http://www.actionlyme.org/MKLEMPNER.htm

"T cells that react to OspA, OspC, and p22 epitopes also recognize
MOBP, SST-R1, and IL-R1, respectively, on neurons, possibly leading to
encephalopathy and radiculopathy. T cell recognition of synovial and
neuronal proteins can cause chronic symptoms for years after the
initial infection. It is not known whether the spirochete is still
present during this chronic stage, or whether symptoms are strictly
due to T cell autoimmunity."


Jeepers! I wouldn't want *THAT* disease!!!
I sure wouldn't want autoreactive T cells
from OspA against my MOBP !!! I better get
and OspA vaccine so I don't get that dangerous
disease!! If I go to New York I might have to deal
with "non-intracellular intracellular" spirochetes
just like in Boston, but if I don't get the OspA
vaccine I could get that dreaded OspA disease,
Lyme, but if I *do* get the vaccine I could get
autoreactive MOBP... which is a dot guv secret
disease that I can't talk about because it's Secret-
Israeli-Russian-PNAC-Intellectual.


Not only that, I have a secret CDC document
that I am not supposed to have, where the
CDC says Lyme is a Relapsing Fever organism:
http://www.actionlyme.org/CDC_DOCUMENTS_1990.htm

^^^Don't look at it or send it around, because
it's illegal.

And Intellectual.

And it doesn't belong to Americans, because this
is America and we paid for it.


For sure I have that Israeli PNAC Disease
because not only do I have circular brain-scramble,
I have illegal Intellectual documents.


Kathleen M. Dickson

================================================
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10195547-38.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-5
March 12, 2009 5:45 PM PDT
Obama White House: Copyright treaty is a 'national security' secret
by Declan McCullagh

* Font size
* Print
* E-mail
* Share
* 6 comments
* Yahoo! Buzz

Last September, the Bush administration defended the unusual secrecy
over an anti-counterfeiting treaty being negotiated by the U.S.
government, which some liberal groups worry could criminalize some
peer-to-peer file sharing that infringes copyrights.

Now President Obama's White House has tightened the cloak of
government secrecy still further, saying in a letter this week that a
discussion draft of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement and
related materials are "classified in the interest of national security
pursuant to Executive Order 12958."

The 1995 Executive Order 12958 allows material to be classified only
if disclosure would do "damage to the national security and the
original classification authority is able to identify or describe the
damage."

Jamie Love, director of the nonprofit group Knowledge Ecology
International, filed the Freedom of Information Act request that
resulted in this week's denial from the White House. The denial letter
(PDF) was sent to Love on Tuesday by Carmen Suro-Bredie, chief FOIA
officer in the White House's Office of the U.S. Trade Representative.

Love had written in his original request on January 31--submitted soon
after Obama's inauguration--that the documents "are being widely
circulated to corporate lobbyists in Europe, Japan, and the U.S. There
is no reason for them to be secret from the American public."

The White House appears to be continuing the secretive policy of the
Bush administration, which wrote to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
(PDF) on January 16 that out of 806 pages related to the treaty, all
but 10 were "classified in the interest of national security pursuant
to Executive Order 12958."

In one of his first acts as president, Obama signed a memo saying FOIA
"should be administered with a clear presumption: In the face of
doubt, openness prevails. The government should not keep information
confidential merely because public officials might be embarrassed by
disclosure."

Love's group believes that the U.S. and Japan want the treaty to say
that willful trademark and copyright infringement on a commercial
scale must be subject to criminal sanctions, including infringement
that has "no direct or indirect motivation of financial gain."

A June 2008 memo (PDF) from the International Chamber of Commerce,
signed by pro-copyright groups, says: "intellectual property theft is
no less a crime than physical property theft. An effective ACTA should
therefore establish clear and transparent standards for the
calculation and imposition of effective criminal penalties for IP
theft that...apply to both online and off-line IP transactions."
Similarly, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has called for "criminal
penalties for IP crimes, including online infringements."

Last fall, two senators--Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Arlen Specter (R-
Penn.)--known for their support of stringent intellectual property
laws, expressed concern that the ACTA could be too far-reaching.
Declan McCullagh, CNET News' chief political correspondent, chronicles
the intersection of politics and technology. He has covered politics,
technology, and Washington, D.C., for more than a decade, which has
turned him into an iconoclast and a skeptic of anyone who says, "We
oughta have a new federal law against this." E-mail Declan.


"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci

0 new messages