"Sickened by an Engineered Virus?. In the Pipeline:"
Mort Zuckerman
Durlan...@yale.edu, Aa...@columbia.edu, gary_w...@nymc.edu,
scientifi...@ostp.gov, pkru...@princeton.edu,
Stanle...@fiu.edu, emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com,
harol...@yale.edu, sedm...@nswbc.org, rrmcg...@aol.com,
fr...@nytimes.com, dpr...@stmartin.edu, saint....@sbcglobal.net
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, criminal...@usdoj.gov,
karla.d...@usdoj.gov, christophe...@usdoj.gov,
richar...@yale.edu, harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu,
inq...@aldf.com, ly...@idsociety.org, meganm...@theatlantic.com
Subject: "Sickened by an Engineered Virus?. In the Pipeline:"
Date: Apr 5, 2010 6:54 PM
ARTICLE BELOW
=================================
There are 3 very important
points here, and the last one
isn't clear, but is very important
nonetheless.
1) The DNA code for at least parts
of the virus were discoverable in the
US patent database. (Pfizer, Assignee
Name, Lentivirus, Abstract)
2) Yes, the usual trick is to deploy
psychiatrists which is long for
mysogynist.
Clue: investigate "matrix-metalloproteinases
and female hormones" [PubMed] and you will see
that the female hormones activate these connective
tissue-degrading enzymes, exacerbating
symptoms in females. ERGO, the conclusion
is that women *do* *suffer* (keyword) more these
"autoimmune diseases," which I have renamed
Duray-Philipp Dysimmunity:
http://www.actionlyme.org/index.htm
It's easy enough to accept that females
are women and suffer the female aspect
of their physiology. In other words,
this is real.
3) But the third aspect of the abuse
of the chronically ill, is that, indeed,
there are some whiners and drugabuser-opportunists
out there who are A) For-real suffering real
Dysimmunity, but B) become hooked on the
drugs.
And then it becomes "all about the drugs."
And this is an epidemic in the Lyme community
that, amazingly, the bad guys aren't mentioning.
So, I will mention it:
Many, many Lyme victims are hooked on
pain killers and opiates and narcotics,
etc, and on and on and on, all day long
for hours... they go on and on about
their symptoms [Zzzzz, they drive me nuts],
and they go on and on about their drugs.
- - - - - - - -
Yes, Pfizer owns some DNA from lentivirus
regardless of whether or not it's just code
or modified code, or spliced code or whatever,
and Yes, BigPharma *always* blames their victims.
Nobody stands up to psychiatry. Nobody
puts them on the nitwitness stand and aks
them about the difference between discrimination
and a DSM diagnoses.
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/discrimination
"They also proscribe discrimination on the basis of race, age, sex,
nationality, disability, or religion."
Cognitive abilities and religion
or belief systems... could be
a DSM "symptom set," and the likes
of "Clinical Psychiatry" outright defies
the Psych.org's rules on ruling out
scientifically valid physiological
challenges to cognition.
AND FINALLY, now we know the authors
of the Psychiatric Imaginory of Wimmins
Patticula Diseases - IDSA - the entity
sued by AG Richard Blumenthal,
http://www.actionlyme.org/080430_RICO_CABAL_CAVES.htm
has finally admitted that their lies about
Lyme, Fibrofeminowooby-itis and Chronic Fatigue
Syndrome have been inhibiting discovery in
Tuberculosis and HIV.
I think the EU and the WHO forced
them into it.
They can't any longer deny that OspA
or fungal antigens activate viruses.
So, you're talking one virus exposure in
a BigPharma lab. We're talking a tick
bite and Borrelia, Ehrlichia, Mycoplasma,
Epstein-Barr, Cytomegalovirus, and funnest
of all, we'd become carriers for the
likes of Tuberculosis due to this
crime and harassment.
We're good, though. A pandemic flu
would not kill us from the resultant
pneumonia or tuberculosis.
Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
http://www.relapsingfever.org
===================================
From: Steve Zeltzer <lv...@igc.org> [Add to Address Book]
To: Undisclosed-recipients@null, , null@null
Subject: Sickened by an Engineered Virus?. In the Pipeline:
Date: Apr 5, 2010 6:12 PM
Attachments: title.gif email.gif ir.gif
Sickened by an Engineered Virus?. In the Pipeline:
http://pipeline.corante.com/archives/2010/04/05/sickened_by_an_engineered_virus.php
« Day Off | Main | Rapamycin for Alzheimer's? »
April 5, 2010
Sickened by an Engineered Virus?
Posted by Derek
What to make of the case of Becky McClain? She's a former Pfizer
scientist who sued the company, claiming that she had been injured by
exposure to engineered biological materials at work. She's just won
her case in court, although Pfizer may well appeal the verdict. It's
important to note that her most damaging claim, that the company
engaged in willful misconduct, was thrown out at the beginning. The
jury found that Pfizer had violated whistleblower laws and wrongfully
terminated McClain as an employee.
But what I'd most like to know is whether the claim at the core of her
case is true, and I don't think anyone knows that yet. McClain says
that she was exposed to embryonic stem cells and to various engineered
lentiviruses (due to poor lab technique on the part of co-workers, if
I'm following the story correctly), and that this gave her a chronic,
debilitating condition that has led to intermittent paralysis. More
specifically, the theory that I've seen her legal team floating is
that the lentivirus caused her tissues to express a new potassium
channel, and that she has improved after taking "massive doses" of
potassium. (Query: how massive are we talking here?).
Now, that's a potentially alarming thing. But that should also be
potentially subject to scientific proof. This trial didn't address any
of these issues, and McClain has been unable to get any traction with
the court system or with OSHA on these claims. Looking around the
internet, you find that some people are convinced that this is a cover-
up, but (having seen OSHA in action) I'm more likely to think that if
you can't get them to bite, then you probably don't have much for them
to get their teeth into. I also note that the symptoms that have been
described in this case are similar to many that have been ascribed in
the past to psychosomatic illness. I can't say that that's what's
going on here, of course, but it does complicate the issue.
The other problem I have is that such human illness from a biotech
viral vector is actually a very rare event, with every case that I can
think of being a deliberate attempt at gene therapy. Industry
scientists don't work with human-infectious viruses without good
cause, but there's still an awful lot of work that goes on with agents
that most certainly can infect people (hepatitis and so on). And
although I'm sure that there have been cases (accidental needle sticks
and the like), I don't know of any research infections with wild-type
viruses, much less engineered ones.
Well, we may yet hear more about this, and I'll rethink the issue if
more information becomes available. But for now, I have to say,
whatever the other issues in the case, I'm inclined to doubt the
engineered-viral-infection part of this story.
"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci