Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
The Anti-Vaccine Science is Real; So say Fauci, the CDC, the NIH, et al
4 views
Skip to first unread message
Mort Zuckerman
Jan 18, 2012, 10:06:52 AM1/18/12
to
To: kathleen...@hhs.gov, francis...@nih.hhs.gov,
margaret...@fda.hhs.gov, dwh...@forbes.com,
ca...@drcarolgoodheart.com, lPick...@cdc.gov, Durlan...@yale.edu,
Aa...@columbia.edu, gary_w...@nymc.edu,
scientifi...@ostp.gov, pkru...@princeton.edu,
Stanle...@fiu.edu, margaret...@hhs.fds.gov,
emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@ct.gov, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@ct.gov, kur...@washpost.com, georg...@washpost.com,
p...@allegorypress.com, commissi...@po.state.ct.us,
brans...@comcast.net, vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us,
freet...@charter.net, scott....@po.state.ct.us,
govern...@po.state.ct.us, attorney...@ct.gov,
randall...@usdoj.gov, Robert....@yale.edu, editor@greenwich-
post.com, harol...@yale.edu, sedm...@nswbc.org, rrmcg...@aol.com,
saint....@sbcglobal.net
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com,
rast...@aol.com, billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com,
rjmu...@aol.com, paulcrai...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, richar...@yale.edu,
harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu, inq...@aldf.com,
ly...@idsociety.org, meganm...@theatlantic.com
Subject: The Anti-Vaccine Science is Real; So say Fauci, the CDC, the
NIH, et al
Date: Jan 18, 2012 9:13 AM
ARTICLE BELOW
==============================
Uh, no.
There is plenty of evidence that children who
are immunosuppressed should not be getting the
live, attenuated viruses in vaccines. And children
should not also be getting vaccines contaminated
with immunosuppressing mycoplasma. We learned
that from LYMErix-Disease.
Nobody pretests children or vaccines for immunosuppression
or mycoplasmal contamination.
See
http://www.actionlyme.org/SEBELIUS_TARDCARE_CRIME.htm
We learned all ^^ that from LYMErix, TB, the
failed MRSA TLR2 agonist non-vaccines and
the failed Pam3Cys HIV vaccine.
===============
Here it is:
http://www.actionlyme.org/SEBELIUS_TARDCARE_CRIME.htm
Update, 120106: Whoops the REtards at the top have made an
announcement:
Well, what the hell is she (Kathleen Sebelius, head of HHS.gov writes
an article in WaPo about "Affordable Healthcare") talking about.
Something like early detection of Lyme (MS, Lupus, ALS, and Cancer are
all caused by Lyme-EBV) and similar fungal infections would save
billions - not to mention misery.
The Affordable Care Act, helping Americans curb health-care costs
www.washingtonpost.com
Why does this ▲ nitwit bother to talk?
We said we wanted "protection against insurance companies writing
diagnosis and treatment guidelines."
And we want protection against BigPharma hiding bad data, creating
diseases to fit the drugs, persecuting their victims, using "Child
Protective Services" (who we have just seen admonished by the NIH for
being "delusional" or "mentally incompetent" or not dealing with
reality) against the parents of drug- and vaccine-injured children,
and the like.
Regulation from the DHHS.gov, in a word.
Welp, she *MUST* be a stupid person since she works for Uncle Sam.
There are no other kind. A degree in "Public Health" is the same
thing as a certificate from The Reverend Jim Jones Seminary.
New Gingrich also whores for the Bigs. He "worked" for the Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ.gov), which is run by
BigInsurance.
The AHRQ.gov tried to create legislation where a doctor - an expert -
could not state under oath, as a medical expert in a malpractice or
other legal proceedings, what was his own expert opinion, if that
opinion was against any established "guidelines." That tells you for
whom the AHRQ.gov works. That tells you there is an entire dot gov
agency dedicated to whoring for the Bigs.
Meanwhile, the NIH has published: A) that OspA could never be a
vaccine, B) that since the HIV vaccine was LYMErix (OspA), it produced
the same results as the failed OspA/Tuberculosis (Pam3Cys or TLR2
agonist) vaccines, and C) the NIH just ordered social-worker-sex-
workers and their pimps, psychiatrists, to go back to school and start
learning about science and similar reality-based (non-psychiatric, non-
cult-like, non-delusional-type DSM-Dogma and -Isms) realities:
A) NIH: "OspA suppresses & reprograms immunity" (wins Nobel; means:
1) Dearborn is a lie, as are the 2) "Lyme" "guidelines")
B) PubMed: "Endotoxin Tolerance and TLR2" ( means: A) LYMErix was not
a vaccine, B) Dearborn is a lie, Borrelial antigens are
immunosuppressive as TLR2 agonists.)
and
C) NIH launches first online genetics course for social and behavioral
scientists, January 3, 2012 News
www.nih.gov
A new genetics educational program(http://www.nchpeg.org/bssr/) will
provide social and behavioral scientists with sufficient genetics
background to allow them to engage effectively in interdisciplinary
research with genetics researchers. The Office of Behavioral and
Social Sciences Research (OBSSR...
Let me ask this question:
If we know that, according to Allen Steere and the CDC officers who
have patents in Europe with SmithKline, there are two types of people:
1) those with Steere's "HLA-linked disease of the knee" (never
scientifically explained by Steere, but explained by Case Western
Reserve's Clifford Harding to be the result of chronic infection with
organisms like mycoplasma and mycobacteria that shed TLR2-agonist-
bearing "vesicles" which are discharged as an HLA-antigen complex,
thus negating the IDSA/Lenny Sigal theory that ChronicKneeLyme - this
ongoing inflammation of the knee-only - is due to shed, unconsumed
DNA) 2) those without the HLA-linked hypersensitivity response,
and if we know that rather than Lyme and LYMErix being generally
hypersensitivity responses (HLA-linked Steere cases of "bad knee"),
they result in immunosuppression - the immunosuppression now famous
for causing antibiotic resistance (MRSA deaths) and the exemption from
pneumonia deaths for people like us Chronic Lyme victims (See the WaPo
article, 120102, below),
and if we know that the MRSA, the HIV, the Tuberculosis vaccines all
failed for the same reason LYMErix failed - because they were all like
LYMErix or were TLR2 agonists, ...
These vaccines DIDN'T produce antibodies and they made existing
infections (like EBV and mycoplasma) worse - See Anthony Fauci on the
failed HIV LYMErix vaccine (next article snippet), but first look at
this report and the structure of HIV and Simian-IVgp120: HIV-Pam3Cys/
LYMErix ◄ It is LYMErix or Pam3Cys in triplicate, duh. (See
PAM3CYS_IMMUNE_SUPPRESSION.htm also, but that is a 2007 summary)
FAUCI: "The initial empirical approach of immunizing with VaxGen's
AIDSVax, a recombinant form of the outer glycoprotein-120 (gp120)
portion of the HIV envelope, which was based on a strategy that was
successful with hepatitis B, failed to protect volunteers from
infection, apparently because the vaccine did not induce broadly
neutralizing antibodies.3"
and
"Both trials were terminated ahead of schedule when data from the STEP
trial showed that the vaccine failed to prevent HIV infection and
failed to lower virus levels in vaccinated volunteers who became
infected. Unexpectedly, post hoc analyses of the STEP trial also found
a trend toward a greater number of new infections among vaccine
recipients than among placebo recipients. The highest relative risk of
HIV infection among vaccinees appeared to be among men who, at
enrollment, were both uncircumcised and had naturally acquired
neutralizing antibodies against the vaccine vector, adenovirus type 5
— whereas no apparent increased risk of HIV acquisition was observed
among circumcised men with no neutralizing antibodies against the
adenovirus at enrollment." http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp0806162
Something ▲that might have been discovered earlier, had Yale - earlier
than 1998 - not lied about the outcome of LYMErix:
EU has Antibiotic-Resistance Hysteria? But Yale and SmithKline (a UK
company) own the proprietary antibiotic-resistance data because
resistance (TLR2 tolerance) is caused by Lyme and LYMErix; they
admitted they knew this at the 1998 FDA meeting!
see the Tb vaccine failure data, and see why the FDA told Merck to
halt the MRSA vaccine trial),
and if DARPA will now work with the FDA and NIH to - finally - use the
latest sensitive technologies to detect diseases, leaving the CDC out
of the loop (CDC just creates diseases, now; they don't any longer do
"surveillance," which is in itself a hazard to DARPA as we have seen
in the past: "Lyme Disease")
then Lyme isn't the only case where the entire DHHS.gov did not know
what they were talking about, scientifically, and should not be
speaking authoritatively about any diseases or policy.
Also, it might be possible that antigens, mycoplasmal contamination,
and carriers in childhood vaccinations - on top of existing infections
that children may already have that they aren't pre-screened for
(DARPA and the FDA have just thunk-up that they may want to use the
best science to detect the earliest cases of new infections) could be
working together to create brain damage.
See the NIH on that Borna-virus/vaccine brain damage connection:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=borna%5BAll%20Fields%5D%20AND%20%28%22viruses%22%5BMeSH%20Terms%5D%20OR%20%22viruses%22%5BAll%20Fields%5D%20OR%20%22virus%22%5BAll%20Fields%5D%29%20AND%20%28%22autistic%20disorder%22%5BMeSH%20Terms%5D%20OR%20%28%22autistic%22%5BAll%20Fields%5D%20AND%20%22disorder%22%5BAll%20Fields%5D%29%20OR%20%22autistic%20disorder%22%5BAll%20Fields%5D%20OR%20%22autism%22%5BAll%20Fields%5D%29&cmd=DetailsSearch
And see where the actual standard for vaccinating immunosuppressed
children with live attenuated viruses is DON'T:
Measles, Mumps, and Rubella -- Vaccine Use and Strategies for
Elimination of Measles, Rubella, and Congenital Rubella Syndrome and
Control of Mumps: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on
Immunization Practices (ACIP) http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00053391.htm
"Updated information on adverse events and contraindications,
particularly for persons with severe HIV infection, persons with a
history of egg allergy or gelatin allergy, persons with a history of
thrombocytopenia, and persons receiving steroid therapy." [are
immunosuppressed- KMD]
Remember, now, it has just been admitted that MS is caused by Epstein-
Barr, in most cases, and that Epstein-Barr antibodies in the
peripheral blood during active brain disease process in MS/related,
won't be there. That means all Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFIDS)
studies which relied on antibody testing for herpesviruses have to be
thrown out.
There will be no antibodies against these chronic active brain
infections in the blood. Therefore, we have to throw out half a
century of published journal articles where the associations were made
between disease or illness status and antibodies in the blood, not
just with CFIDS, but with all other "autoimmune" diseases (EBV in MS
is active in the lesions:
Latent Virus Sparks Inflammation in MS
3, 2012 (MedPage Today) — Epstein-Barr virus may play a role in
multiple sclerosis (MS) by activating innate immune responses,
researchers found.
And that applies to all the vaccine trials as well. Thrown out.
Garbage.
Some vaccine vials may have been contaminated with mycoplasma, and if
that is the case, then the children are getting LYMErix-like
immunosuppression plus the live (attenuated) viruses:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%28%22mycoplasma%22%5BMeSH%20Terms%5D%20OR%20%22mycoplasma%22%5BAll%20Fields%5D%29%20AND%20contamination%5BAll%20Fields%5D%20AND%20%28%22vaccines%22%5BMeSH%20Terms%5D%20OR%20%22vaccines%22%5BAll%20Fields%5D%29&cmd=DetailsSearch
Get it?
You have the active-virus-in-the-brain-from-fungal-antigen-induced-
immunosuppression in a can.
'In a vaccine vial.
'Do-Overs of LYMErix Disease by the millions, in children. Children
who now will be institutionalized in adulthood and who will be subject
to pervert molestations by the likes of DCF's "penis-biter" "carers"
and TSA Agent crotch-groper-and-voyeur Wannabees, in their millions,
too!
And this is all sanctioned by the idiots we pay $1-300,000 a year to
be experts?
Every aspect of human health and care, failed. Not just failed, has
been permanently damaging and lethal. And not just permanently
damaging and lethal, but you will have no government protection - no
legal protection - if you blow the whistle on the Bigs or their
prostitutes at the DHHS.gov, any local gov prostitutes, or the Bigs'
prostitute politicians like Newt Gingrich or Wall-Street-and-Henry-
Kissinger's whorey little totalitarian, warmongering bitch, Mitt
Romney. You'll get the Dickson/Manning treatment.
This is the democracy we intend to export by violence. This is the
New World Order, where the corporations and the CEOs and the rich
people are smarter thinkers than the rest of us. They know what is
best for us'n poor-people serfs.
And the Bigs know what's best for the military dogs who serve them:
If you don't make the genetics cut via this vaccines and drugs parsing
and culling,... you're dead. Physically dead or silenced in one of
the USA's global dungeons.
Other Questions:
Do we know of an instance where one of the Bigs (Pharma or Insurance)
knew of the damaging results of their vaccine and did not report it to
the FDA or the NIH?
Do we know of instances where the FDA Vaccine Committee members knew
about the damage from the drug or where the disease was spun to suit
the manufacturer's/patent holder's bottom line?
Do we know of instances where a criminal biotech organization
recruited someone from inside the NIH to funnel money into their
private ALDF.com enterprise in order to support their product-based or
BigInsurance's claim-denial based position?
Do we know of instances where such notorious crooks have not been
prosecuted to "send a message?"
Has the BMJ just asserted such should happen?
"Discipline?"
I think that in response to the "Discipline for Scientific Garbage"
just suggested by BMJ was the reason Kathleen Sebelius just puked up
this nonsensical, side-stepping response in WaPo.
BMJ: Discipline Researchers Who Withhold Research Results
Vs: The Affordable Care Act, helping Americans curb health-care costs
- Kathleen Sebelius in WaPo.
Vs: Death to Non-LYMErix Disease victims: Flu’s lethality is
attributed to immune systems overreacting to the virus
A formulary ▲well known, here at ActionLyme, since it is the thing I
have been screaming about since I said it to the FDA Vaccine Committee
in person, showing the actual data regarding what happened at Dearborn
and reporting the IMMUNE SUPPRESSION science 11 years ago Jan 31:
I mentioned this Dattwyler's NK-cell immunosuppression due to LYMErix
(as well as the production of the immunosuppressive cytokine IL-10) to
the FDA Vaccine Committee in Jan, 2001: http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/slides/3680s2_11.pdf
How effing retarded.
But, that's what we get, in America.
Guess what, Kathleen Sebelius? I am paid NOTHING for this work and
never was.
Who the hell are you to get published in WaPo for saying NOTHING that
is comprehensive about health and the Bigs' crimes?
Even the BMJ could do it, but you can't?
You can't speak for us, while getting paid to speak for us, Kathleen
Sebelius?
What do you call it when you pay for debased service?
What do we call it, when someone pretends to be an expert so they can
make over $100,000 a year for having no real talent and offering no
real help or real solutions (or prosecutions)?
Why federal experts command , and deserve , high salaries
Federal Times - 5 days ago
I also recall there was concern about NIH salaries in the 1980s.
Researchers were leaving for university research centers where they
were paid higher ...
"They [blank] man, they [blank]"
We want prosecutions. And compensation, obviously.
We want Uncle "Justice" Sam to "send a message" to corporate crooks.
Until he does, Uncle Sam has no nuts.
Uncle Sam is a eunuch for all his international "human rights" and
"democracy" blowhardery.
-------- 120106; Kathleen Dickson
==============
==============
So, you get the big picture.
No one in the "American" "Government" has a scientific
leg to stand on and have no authority - medical, scientific,.
moral or legal - to be issuing any diktats on "care" of
any sort.
There is so much FRAUD *and incompetence* that there is
an open rebellion going on, globally, in the scientific
community - and even in the lamestream publications
about this RESEARCH FRAUD.
http://www.actionlyme.org
The world watches this. The USA has no standing to
be saying anything about medical science. It's a free-
for-all.
For all of this self-alleged brain expertise issued
from Yale, none of their employees knew a single thing
about integrity. See how it all blew up in their faces.
KMDickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
===================================
http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2011/12/jenny_mccarthy_plans_to_promote_antivaccine.php
Here we go again.
In fact, I think I'm starting to see a pattern here among antivaccine
organizations. You might remember that in November 2010, the
antivaccine group SafeMinds bought ad space in AMC Theaters over the
Thanksgiving holiday weekend, one of the heaviest moviegoing time
periods of the year. This use of pre-movie time to promote antivaccine
propaganda resulted in a campaign by skeptics to try to persuade AMC
to see the error of its ways, a campaign that was successful.
Then, a few months later, the the grande dame of the antivaccine
movement, arguably the woman who started the most recent incarnation
of that hoary old anti-science movement back in the 1980s, Barbara Loe
Fisher, decided to start advertising the antivaccine message she
promotes through her group, the Orwellian-named National Vaccine
Information Center (NVIC) using the JumboTron in Times Square.
Unfortunately, despite protests from the American Academy of
Pediatrics, promoters of science-based medicine, and skeptics, the ads
apparently aired for the full buy.
Then, a few months later (just last month, in fact), somehow the NVIC
managed to dupe Delta Airlines, through its video provider In-Flight
Media into airing a more subtle "public service announcement" whose
antivaccine message was cleverly muted so that it wasn't so obvious,
except to those of us who knew the NVIC (and, of course, the buzzwords
used by the antivaccine movement) that its message was antivaccine. Of
course, it also didn't help that the PSA urged viewers to go to the
NVIC website, which, as I've described many times before, is a font of
misinformation, pseudoscience, and antivaccine propaganda. (Just type
"NVIC" into this blog's search box to see.) At least Fisher's response
of crying "repression" in response to the AAP's complaint to Delta Air
Lines was good for a chuckle or two. Unfortunately, the NVIC
advertorials aired through the entire buy. Meanwhile, this fall a
major dump of antivaccine propaganda was circulating around the
country in various film festivals in the form of an antivaccine
propaganda movie called The Greater Good, whose manipulativeness and
misinformation would make a North Korean propagandists planning state
media coverage of Kim Jong-il's funeral blush.
Now, it would appear, the NVIC wants to close out 2011 and ring in
2012 with a new round of antivaccine propaganda, this time revisiting
Times Square at the heart of the New Years Eve celebration, an effort
it's trumpeting through a press release entitled National Vaccine
Information Center (NVIC) Educates One Million Plus in Times Square on
New Year's Eve. Here, Barbara, I'll fix that for you. It should read
"National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) Mis-Educates One Million
Plus in Times Square on New Year's Eve."
There, that's better.
Interestingly, the ad is not airing on the JumboTron (perhaps CBS
turned the NVIC down). This time, it's airing on the TSQdigital
display right by the TKTS Broadway Ticket Booth. But what, exactly, is
the NVIC airing? Well, here's the description from the press release:
The non-profit National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) is
sponsoring a vaccine education message during the New Year's Eve
celebration in Times Square on the 5,000 square-foot TSQ Digital
screen at 47th St. and 7th Avenue in New York City. The 15-second ad,
which encourages informed decision-making, has been shown on the
megatron twice an hour for 21 hours a day since Dec. 16, 2011.
"Everyone has the right to know about the benefits and risks of
products and choose the kind of preventive health care they want for
themselves and their children."
"In 2012, NVIC will mark our 30th year of public education and
consumer empowerment," said NVIC co-founder and president Barbara Loe
Fisher. "With so many health care options available today, becoming an
educated health care consumer is essential and our pro-informed
consent message will be seen by millions on New Year's Eve."
The full-color LED screen on which NVIC's ad is appearing is located
near the Times Square Information Center in the heart of the Broadway
district and is one of the largest digital display screens in the
Times Square area. An estimated one million people pack the Times
Square area during New Year's Eve and the celebration is viewed on
television by billions of people around the world.
NVIC co-sponsored a similar vaccine education message with Mercola.com
last spring on another display in Times Square. During November, NVIC
sponsored a flu prevention video on Delta Air Line's in-flight
programming that encouraged consumers to become informed about how to
stay well during the flu season and all year-around.
"Knowledge is the key to informed consumer decision-making," said
Fisher. "Everyone has the right to know about the benefits and risks
of products and choose the kind of preventive health care they want
for themselves and their children."
As I said, NVIC has the Orwellian language down pat. It wraps up its
antivaccine message in a cloak of "informed consent" and "educating
the consumer," and who could argue with that? Of course, it all comes
down to what specifically is meant by "informed consent" and
"educating the consumer." As I described in detail, when an
antivaccine propagandist like Barbara Loe Fisher refers to "informed
consent," what she is really referring to is "misinformed consent," in
which consumers are subjected to misinformation about vaccines that
vastly overestimates the risks and vastly downplays the benefits or
try to cast the benefits in a manner that makes them seem
inconsequential, sometimes in hilariously stupid ways. Often,
antivaccine activists use even more hilariously bad science to bolster
their misinformed arguments. Or the bad science would be hilarious if
the consequences of its use weren't so potentially deadly.
Anyway, let's look at the video:
It would appear that the NVIC has--shall we say?--simplified its
message for Times Square. Basically, the video consists of a picture
of a mother holding a baby (which is a favorite image of the
antivaccine movement, of course) with the NVIC logo and website URL in
the lower left hand corner. It then flashes the words "Vaccines: Know
the risks" followed by "Vaccination: Your Health. Your Family. Your
Choice," the latter superimposed over a graphic of the Statue of
Liberty.
Subtle, isn't it?
Those not familiar with the NVIC would ask: What on earth is wrong
with this message? Don't you want parents to know the risks of
vaccination? Don't you think that personal freedom is important? Let's
go back to the concept of misinformed consent. If you know, as I do,
that the NVIC website is a cesspit of pseudoscience, fear mongering,
and misinformation about vaccines (again, type "NVIC" into the search
box of this blog for examples), then this video starts to look a lot
less benign. The reason, of course, is that it's not the purpose of
the NVIC to provide parents with an evidence- and science-based
assessment of vaccine risks and benefits. The purpose of the NVIC is
to scare parents into not vaccinating.
Barbara Loe Fisher will strenuously deny that she is antivaccine and
claim that she is pro-vaccine safety. There might, in fact, have been
a time when this might arguably have been true, but Fisher long ago
passed from being a vaccine safety activist into the realm of
antivaccine nuttery, as her website demonstrates so strongly. I think
it would be really interesting one day to ask Fisher a simple
question: "If you're not 'antivaccine,' then please tell us which
vaccines you consider safe and effective. Which vaccines should be on
the pediatric vaccine schedule?" I've yet to find a statement by
Fisher in the last decade supporting the use of any vaccine. Of
course, Fisher, being the seasoned PR flack for the antivaccine
movement that she's become over the last 30 years, probably has a pat
answer to that question that hides her antivaccine agenda, at least to
the unknowing. It's still a good question to ask any antivaccine
activist very insistently. The answer often reveals much. In fact, if
you want to see an example of this very technique in action, check out
the comments after this post on the anti vaccine propaganda blog Age
of Autism in which a commenter asks Jake Crosby which vaccine(s) he
finds acceptable. John Stone responds with some blather about
"parental choice" (completely dodging the question) and Jake responds
thusly:
No, I don't "care to explain." I don't have to explain anything. The
people who are anti-vaccine are the people who say they are anti-
vaccine - not the people who say vaccines cause autism - although I am
sure the latter understandably includes some of the former.
Brilliant reply, Jake! Ya think? Barbara Loe Fisher is, of course,
less clumsy at dancing around difficult questions than the Boy Wonder
of the antivaccine movement. Unfortunately, he'll no doubt get better
with practice. He is, after all, very young and inexperienced in
propaganda, and it shows. In any case, the purpose of this Times
Square ad is clearly to get people to go to the NVIC website and drink
of the antivaccine crazy therein, and it's apparently been airing for
nearly two weeks. It will be airing on New Years Eve.
And Jenny McCarthy will be promoting it on Dick Clark's Rockin' New
Year's Eve. At least, she plans to try.
Take a look at the the Facebook page of the propaganda arm of the
antivaccine group Generation Rescue (screenshot sent to me by a
reader):
margaret...@fda.hhs.gov, dwh...@forbes.com,
ca...@drcarolgoodheart.com, lPick...@cdc.gov, Durlan...@yale.edu,
Aa...@columbia.edu, gary_w...@nymc.edu,
scientifi...@ostp.gov, pkru...@princeton.edu,
Stanle...@fiu.edu, margaret...@hhs.fds.gov,
emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@ct.gov, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@ct.gov, kur...@washpost.com, georg...@washpost.com,
p...@allegorypress.com, commissi...@po.state.ct.us,
brans...@comcast.net, vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us,
freet...@charter.net, scott....@po.state.ct.us,
govern...@po.state.ct.us, attorney...@ct.gov,
randall...@usdoj.gov, Robert....@yale.edu, editor@greenwich-
post.com, harol...@yale.edu, sedm...@nswbc.org, rrmcg...@aol.com,
saint....@sbcglobal.net
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com,
rast...@aol.com, billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com,
rjmu...@aol.com, paulcrai...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, richar...@yale.edu,
harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu, inq...@aldf.com,
ly...@idsociety.org, meganm...@theatlantic.com
Subject: The Anti-Vaccine Science is Real; So say Fauci, the CDC, the
NIH, et al
Date: Jan 18, 2012 9:13 AM
ARTICLE BELOW
==============================
Uh, no.
There is plenty of evidence that children who
are immunosuppressed should not be getting the
live, attenuated viruses in vaccines. And children
should not also be getting vaccines contaminated
with immunosuppressing mycoplasma. We learned
that from LYMErix-Disease.
Nobody pretests children or vaccines for immunosuppression
or mycoplasmal contamination.
See
http://www.actionlyme.org/SEBELIUS_TARDCARE_CRIME.htm
We learned all ^^ that from LYMErix, TB, the
failed MRSA TLR2 agonist non-vaccines and
the failed Pam3Cys HIV vaccine.
===============
Here it is:
http://www.actionlyme.org/SEBELIUS_TARDCARE_CRIME.htm
Update, 120106: Whoops the REtards at the top have made an
announcement:
Well, what the hell is she (Kathleen Sebelius, head of HHS.gov writes
an article in WaPo about "Affordable Healthcare") talking about.
Something like early detection of Lyme (MS, Lupus, ALS, and Cancer are
all caused by Lyme-EBV) and similar fungal infections would save
billions - not to mention misery.
The Affordable Care Act, helping Americans curb health-care costs
www.washingtonpost.com
Why does this ▲ nitwit bother to talk?
We said we wanted "protection against insurance companies writing
diagnosis and treatment guidelines."
And we want protection against BigPharma hiding bad data, creating
diseases to fit the drugs, persecuting their victims, using "Child
Protective Services" (who we have just seen admonished by the NIH for
being "delusional" or "mentally incompetent" or not dealing with
reality) against the parents of drug- and vaccine-injured children,
and the like.
Regulation from the DHHS.gov, in a word.
Welp, she *MUST* be a stupid person since she works for Uncle Sam.
There are no other kind. A degree in "Public Health" is the same
thing as a certificate from The Reverend Jim Jones Seminary.
New Gingrich also whores for the Bigs. He "worked" for the Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ.gov), which is run by
BigInsurance.
The AHRQ.gov tried to create legislation where a doctor - an expert -
could not state under oath, as a medical expert in a malpractice or
other legal proceedings, what was his own expert opinion, if that
opinion was against any established "guidelines." That tells you for
whom the AHRQ.gov works. That tells you there is an entire dot gov
agency dedicated to whoring for the Bigs.
Meanwhile, the NIH has published: A) that OspA could never be a
vaccine, B) that since the HIV vaccine was LYMErix (OspA), it produced
the same results as the failed OspA/Tuberculosis (Pam3Cys or TLR2
agonist) vaccines, and C) the NIH just ordered social-worker-sex-
workers and their pimps, psychiatrists, to go back to school and start
learning about science and similar reality-based (non-psychiatric, non-
cult-like, non-delusional-type DSM-Dogma and -Isms) realities:
A) NIH: "OspA suppresses & reprograms immunity" (wins Nobel; means:
1) Dearborn is a lie, as are the 2) "Lyme" "guidelines")
B) PubMed: "Endotoxin Tolerance and TLR2" ( means: A) LYMErix was not
a vaccine, B) Dearborn is a lie, Borrelial antigens are
immunosuppressive as TLR2 agonists.)
and
C) NIH launches first online genetics course for social and behavioral
scientists, January 3, 2012 News
www.nih.gov
A new genetics educational program(http://www.nchpeg.org/bssr/) will
provide social and behavioral scientists with sufficient genetics
background to allow them to engage effectively in interdisciplinary
research with genetics researchers. The Office of Behavioral and
Social Sciences Research (OBSSR...
Let me ask this question:
If we know that, according to Allen Steere and the CDC officers who
have patents in Europe with SmithKline, there are two types of people:
1) those with Steere's "HLA-linked disease of the knee" (never
scientifically explained by Steere, but explained by Case Western
Reserve's Clifford Harding to be the result of chronic infection with
organisms like mycoplasma and mycobacteria that shed TLR2-agonist-
bearing "vesicles" which are discharged as an HLA-antigen complex,
thus negating the IDSA/Lenny Sigal theory that ChronicKneeLyme - this
ongoing inflammation of the knee-only - is due to shed, unconsumed
DNA) 2) those without the HLA-linked hypersensitivity response,
and if we know that rather than Lyme and LYMErix being generally
hypersensitivity responses (HLA-linked Steere cases of "bad knee"),
they result in immunosuppression - the immunosuppression now famous
for causing antibiotic resistance (MRSA deaths) and the exemption from
pneumonia deaths for people like us Chronic Lyme victims (See the WaPo
article, 120102, below),
and if we know that the MRSA, the HIV, the Tuberculosis vaccines all
failed for the same reason LYMErix failed - because they were all like
LYMErix or were TLR2 agonists, ...
These vaccines DIDN'T produce antibodies and they made existing
infections (like EBV and mycoplasma) worse - See Anthony Fauci on the
failed HIV LYMErix vaccine (next article snippet), but first look at
this report and the structure of HIV and Simian-IVgp120: HIV-Pam3Cys/
LYMErix ◄ It is LYMErix or Pam3Cys in triplicate, duh. (See
PAM3CYS_IMMUNE_SUPPRESSION.htm also, but that is a 2007 summary)
FAUCI: "The initial empirical approach of immunizing with VaxGen's
AIDSVax, a recombinant form of the outer glycoprotein-120 (gp120)
portion of the HIV envelope, which was based on a strategy that was
successful with hepatitis B, failed to protect volunteers from
infection, apparently because the vaccine did not induce broadly
neutralizing antibodies.3"
and
"Both trials were terminated ahead of schedule when data from the STEP
trial showed that the vaccine failed to prevent HIV infection and
failed to lower virus levels in vaccinated volunteers who became
infected. Unexpectedly, post hoc analyses of the STEP trial also found
a trend toward a greater number of new infections among vaccine
recipients than among placebo recipients. The highest relative risk of
HIV infection among vaccinees appeared to be among men who, at
enrollment, were both uncircumcised and had naturally acquired
neutralizing antibodies against the vaccine vector, adenovirus type 5
— whereas no apparent increased risk of HIV acquisition was observed
among circumcised men with no neutralizing antibodies against the
adenovirus at enrollment." http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp0806162
Something ▲that might have been discovered earlier, had Yale - earlier
than 1998 - not lied about the outcome of LYMErix:
EU has Antibiotic-Resistance Hysteria? But Yale and SmithKline (a UK
company) own the proprietary antibiotic-resistance data because
resistance (TLR2 tolerance) is caused by Lyme and LYMErix; they
admitted they knew this at the 1998 FDA meeting!
see the Tb vaccine failure data, and see why the FDA told Merck to
halt the MRSA vaccine trial),
and if DARPA will now work with the FDA and NIH to - finally - use the
latest sensitive technologies to detect diseases, leaving the CDC out
of the loop (CDC just creates diseases, now; they don't any longer do
"surveillance," which is in itself a hazard to DARPA as we have seen
in the past: "Lyme Disease")
then Lyme isn't the only case where the entire DHHS.gov did not know
what they were talking about, scientifically, and should not be
speaking authoritatively about any diseases or policy.
Also, it might be possible that antigens, mycoplasmal contamination,
and carriers in childhood vaccinations - on top of existing infections
that children may already have that they aren't pre-screened for
(DARPA and the FDA have just thunk-up that they may want to use the
best science to detect the earliest cases of new infections) could be
working together to create brain damage.
See the NIH on that Borna-virus/vaccine brain damage connection:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=borna%5BAll%20Fields%5D%20AND%20%28%22viruses%22%5BMeSH%20Terms%5D%20OR%20%22viruses%22%5BAll%20Fields%5D%20OR%20%22virus%22%5BAll%20Fields%5D%29%20AND%20%28%22autistic%20disorder%22%5BMeSH%20Terms%5D%20OR%20%28%22autistic%22%5BAll%20Fields%5D%20AND%20%22disorder%22%5BAll%20Fields%5D%29%20OR%20%22autistic%20disorder%22%5BAll%20Fields%5D%20OR%20%22autism%22%5BAll%20Fields%5D%29&cmd=DetailsSearch
And see where the actual standard for vaccinating immunosuppressed
children with live attenuated viruses is DON'T:
Measles, Mumps, and Rubella -- Vaccine Use and Strategies for
Elimination of Measles, Rubella, and Congenital Rubella Syndrome and
Control of Mumps: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on
Immunization Practices (ACIP) http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00053391.htm
"Updated information on adverse events and contraindications,
particularly for persons with severe HIV infection, persons with a
history of egg allergy or gelatin allergy, persons with a history of
thrombocytopenia, and persons receiving steroid therapy." [are
immunosuppressed- KMD]
Remember, now, it has just been admitted that MS is caused by Epstein-
Barr, in most cases, and that Epstein-Barr antibodies in the
peripheral blood during active brain disease process in MS/related,
won't be there. That means all Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFIDS)
studies which relied on antibody testing for herpesviruses have to be
thrown out.
There will be no antibodies against these chronic active brain
infections in the blood. Therefore, we have to throw out half a
century of published journal articles where the associations were made
between disease or illness status and antibodies in the blood, not
just with CFIDS, but with all other "autoimmune" diseases (EBV in MS
is active in the lesions:
Latent Virus Sparks Inflammation in MS
3, 2012 (MedPage Today) — Epstein-Barr virus may play a role in
multiple sclerosis (MS) by activating innate immune responses,
researchers found.
And that applies to all the vaccine trials as well. Thrown out.
Garbage.
Some vaccine vials may have been contaminated with mycoplasma, and if
that is the case, then the children are getting LYMErix-like
immunosuppression plus the live (attenuated) viruses:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=%28%22mycoplasma%22%5BMeSH%20Terms%5D%20OR%20%22mycoplasma%22%5BAll%20Fields%5D%29%20AND%20contamination%5BAll%20Fields%5D%20AND%20%28%22vaccines%22%5BMeSH%20Terms%5D%20OR%20%22vaccines%22%5BAll%20Fields%5D%29&cmd=DetailsSearch
Get it?
You have the active-virus-in-the-brain-from-fungal-antigen-induced-
immunosuppression in a can.
'In a vaccine vial.
'Do-Overs of LYMErix Disease by the millions, in children. Children
who now will be institutionalized in adulthood and who will be subject
to pervert molestations by the likes of DCF's "penis-biter" "carers"
and TSA Agent crotch-groper-and-voyeur Wannabees, in their millions,
too!
And this is all sanctioned by the idiots we pay $1-300,000 a year to
be experts?
Every aspect of human health and care, failed. Not just failed, has
been permanently damaging and lethal. And not just permanently
damaging and lethal, but you will have no government protection - no
legal protection - if you blow the whistle on the Bigs or their
prostitutes at the DHHS.gov, any local gov prostitutes, or the Bigs'
prostitute politicians like Newt Gingrich or Wall-Street-and-Henry-
Kissinger's whorey little totalitarian, warmongering bitch, Mitt
Romney. You'll get the Dickson/Manning treatment.
This is the democracy we intend to export by violence. This is the
New World Order, where the corporations and the CEOs and the rich
people are smarter thinkers than the rest of us. They know what is
best for us'n poor-people serfs.
And the Bigs know what's best for the military dogs who serve them:
If you don't make the genetics cut via this vaccines and drugs parsing
and culling,... you're dead. Physically dead or silenced in one of
the USA's global dungeons.
Other Questions:
Do we know of an instance where one of the Bigs (Pharma or Insurance)
knew of the damaging results of their vaccine and did not report it to
the FDA or the NIH?
Do we know of instances where the FDA Vaccine Committee members knew
about the damage from the drug or where the disease was spun to suit
the manufacturer's/patent holder's bottom line?
Do we know of instances where a criminal biotech organization
recruited someone from inside the NIH to funnel money into their
private ALDF.com enterprise in order to support their product-based or
BigInsurance's claim-denial based position?
Do we know of instances where such notorious crooks have not been
prosecuted to "send a message?"
Has the BMJ just asserted such should happen?
"Discipline?"
I think that in response to the "Discipline for Scientific Garbage"
just suggested by BMJ was the reason Kathleen Sebelius just puked up
this nonsensical, side-stepping response in WaPo.
BMJ: Discipline Researchers Who Withhold Research Results
Vs: The Affordable Care Act, helping Americans curb health-care costs
- Kathleen Sebelius in WaPo.
Vs: Death to Non-LYMErix Disease victims: Flu’s lethality is
attributed to immune systems overreacting to the virus
A formulary ▲well known, here at ActionLyme, since it is the thing I
have been screaming about since I said it to the FDA Vaccine Committee
in person, showing the actual data regarding what happened at Dearborn
and reporting the IMMUNE SUPPRESSION science 11 years ago Jan 31:
I mentioned this Dattwyler's NK-cell immunosuppression due to LYMErix
(as well as the production of the immunosuppressive cytokine IL-10) to
the FDA Vaccine Committee in Jan, 2001: http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/slides/3680s2_11.pdf
How effing retarded.
But, that's what we get, in America.
Guess what, Kathleen Sebelius? I am paid NOTHING for this work and
never was.
Who the hell are you to get published in WaPo for saying NOTHING that
is comprehensive about health and the Bigs' crimes?
Even the BMJ could do it, but you can't?
You can't speak for us, while getting paid to speak for us, Kathleen
Sebelius?
What do you call it when you pay for debased service?
What do we call it, when someone pretends to be an expert so they can
make over $100,000 a year for having no real talent and offering no
real help or real solutions (or prosecutions)?
Why federal experts command , and deserve , high salaries
Federal Times - 5 days ago
I also recall there was concern about NIH salaries in the 1980s.
Researchers were leaving for university research centers where they
were paid higher ...
"They [blank] man, they [blank]"
We want prosecutions. And compensation, obviously.
We want Uncle "Justice" Sam to "send a message" to corporate crooks.
Until he does, Uncle Sam has no nuts.
Uncle Sam is a eunuch for all his international "human rights" and
"democracy" blowhardery.
-------- 120106; Kathleen Dickson
==============
==============
So, you get the big picture.
No one in the "American" "Government" has a scientific
leg to stand on and have no authority - medical, scientific,.
moral or legal - to be issuing any diktats on "care" of
any sort.
There is so much FRAUD *and incompetence* that there is
an open rebellion going on, globally, in the scientific
community - and even in the lamestream publications
about this RESEARCH FRAUD.
http://www.actionlyme.org
The world watches this. The USA has no standing to
be saying anything about medical science. It's a free-
for-all.
For all of this self-alleged brain expertise issued
from Yale, none of their employees knew a single thing
about integrity. See how it all blew up in their faces.
KMDickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
===================================
http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2011/12/jenny_mccarthy_plans_to_promote_antivaccine.php
Here we go again.
In fact, I think I'm starting to see a pattern here among antivaccine
organizations. You might remember that in November 2010, the
antivaccine group SafeMinds bought ad space in AMC Theaters over the
Thanksgiving holiday weekend, one of the heaviest moviegoing time
periods of the year. This use of pre-movie time to promote antivaccine
propaganda resulted in a campaign by skeptics to try to persuade AMC
to see the error of its ways, a campaign that was successful.
Then, a few months later, the the grande dame of the antivaccine
movement, arguably the woman who started the most recent incarnation
of that hoary old anti-science movement back in the 1980s, Barbara Loe
Fisher, decided to start advertising the antivaccine message she
promotes through her group, the Orwellian-named National Vaccine
Information Center (NVIC) using the JumboTron in Times Square.
Unfortunately, despite protests from the American Academy of
Pediatrics, promoters of science-based medicine, and skeptics, the ads
apparently aired for the full buy.
Then, a few months later (just last month, in fact), somehow the NVIC
managed to dupe Delta Airlines, through its video provider In-Flight
Media into airing a more subtle "public service announcement" whose
antivaccine message was cleverly muted so that it wasn't so obvious,
except to those of us who knew the NVIC (and, of course, the buzzwords
used by the antivaccine movement) that its message was antivaccine. Of
course, it also didn't help that the PSA urged viewers to go to the
NVIC website, which, as I've described many times before, is a font of
misinformation, pseudoscience, and antivaccine propaganda. (Just type
"NVIC" into this blog's search box to see.) At least Fisher's response
of crying "repression" in response to the AAP's complaint to Delta Air
Lines was good for a chuckle or two. Unfortunately, the NVIC
advertorials aired through the entire buy. Meanwhile, this fall a
major dump of antivaccine propaganda was circulating around the
country in various film festivals in the form of an antivaccine
propaganda movie called The Greater Good, whose manipulativeness and
misinformation would make a North Korean propagandists planning state
media coverage of Kim Jong-il's funeral blush.
Now, it would appear, the NVIC wants to close out 2011 and ring in
2012 with a new round of antivaccine propaganda, this time revisiting
Times Square at the heart of the New Years Eve celebration, an effort
it's trumpeting through a press release entitled National Vaccine
Information Center (NVIC) Educates One Million Plus in Times Square on
New Year's Eve. Here, Barbara, I'll fix that for you. It should read
"National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) Mis-Educates One Million
Plus in Times Square on New Year's Eve."
There, that's better.
Interestingly, the ad is not airing on the JumboTron (perhaps CBS
turned the NVIC down). This time, it's airing on the TSQdigital
display right by the TKTS Broadway Ticket Booth. But what, exactly, is
the NVIC airing? Well, here's the description from the press release:
The non-profit National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) is
sponsoring a vaccine education message during the New Year's Eve
celebration in Times Square on the 5,000 square-foot TSQ Digital
screen at 47th St. and 7th Avenue in New York City. The 15-second ad,
which encourages informed decision-making, has been shown on the
megatron twice an hour for 21 hours a day since Dec. 16, 2011.
"Everyone has the right to know about the benefits and risks of
products and choose the kind of preventive health care they want for
themselves and their children."
"In 2012, NVIC will mark our 30th year of public education and
consumer empowerment," said NVIC co-founder and president Barbara Loe
Fisher. "With so many health care options available today, becoming an
educated health care consumer is essential and our pro-informed
consent message will be seen by millions on New Year's Eve."
The full-color LED screen on which NVIC's ad is appearing is located
near the Times Square Information Center in the heart of the Broadway
district and is one of the largest digital display screens in the
Times Square area. An estimated one million people pack the Times
Square area during New Year's Eve and the celebration is viewed on
television by billions of people around the world.
NVIC co-sponsored a similar vaccine education message with Mercola.com
last spring on another display in Times Square. During November, NVIC
sponsored a flu prevention video on Delta Air Line's in-flight
programming that encouraged consumers to become informed about how to
stay well during the flu season and all year-around.
"Knowledge is the key to informed consumer decision-making," said
Fisher. "Everyone has the right to know about the benefits and risks
of products and choose the kind of preventive health care they want
for themselves and their children."
As I said, NVIC has the Orwellian language down pat. It wraps up its
antivaccine message in a cloak of "informed consent" and "educating
the consumer," and who could argue with that? Of course, it all comes
down to what specifically is meant by "informed consent" and
"educating the consumer." As I described in detail, when an
antivaccine propagandist like Barbara Loe Fisher refers to "informed
consent," what she is really referring to is "misinformed consent," in
which consumers are subjected to misinformation about vaccines that
vastly overestimates the risks and vastly downplays the benefits or
try to cast the benefits in a manner that makes them seem
inconsequential, sometimes in hilariously stupid ways. Often,
antivaccine activists use even more hilariously bad science to bolster
their misinformed arguments. Or the bad science would be hilarious if
the consequences of its use weren't so potentially deadly.
Anyway, let's look at the video:
It would appear that the NVIC has--shall we say?--simplified its
message for Times Square. Basically, the video consists of a picture
of a mother holding a baby (which is a favorite image of the
antivaccine movement, of course) with the NVIC logo and website URL in
the lower left hand corner. It then flashes the words "Vaccines: Know
the risks" followed by "Vaccination: Your Health. Your Family. Your
Choice," the latter superimposed over a graphic of the Statue of
Liberty.
Subtle, isn't it?
Those not familiar with the NVIC would ask: What on earth is wrong
with this message? Don't you want parents to know the risks of
vaccination? Don't you think that personal freedom is important? Let's
go back to the concept of misinformed consent. If you know, as I do,
that the NVIC website is a cesspit of pseudoscience, fear mongering,
and misinformation about vaccines (again, type "NVIC" into the search
box of this blog for examples), then this video starts to look a lot
less benign. The reason, of course, is that it's not the purpose of
the NVIC to provide parents with an evidence- and science-based
assessment of vaccine risks and benefits. The purpose of the NVIC is
to scare parents into not vaccinating.
Barbara Loe Fisher will strenuously deny that she is antivaccine and
claim that she is pro-vaccine safety. There might, in fact, have been
a time when this might arguably have been true, but Fisher long ago
passed from being a vaccine safety activist into the realm of
antivaccine nuttery, as her website demonstrates so strongly. I think
it would be really interesting one day to ask Fisher a simple
question: "If you're not 'antivaccine,' then please tell us which
vaccines you consider safe and effective. Which vaccines should be on
the pediatric vaccine schedule?" I've yet to find a statement by
Fisher in the last decade supporting the use of any vaccine. Of
course, Fisher, being the seasoned PR flack for the antivaccine
movement that she's become over the last 30 years, probably has a pat
answer to that question that hides her antivaccine agenda, at least to
the unknowing. It's still a good question to ask any antivaccine
activist very insistently. The answer often reveals much. In fact, if
you want to see an example of this very technique in action, check out
the comments after this post on the anti vaccine propaganda blog Age
of Autism in which a commenter asks Jake Crosby which vaccine(s) he
finds acceptable. John Stone responds with some blather about
"parental choice" (completely dodging the question) and Jake responds
thusly:
No, I don't "care to explain." I don't have to explain anything. The
people who are anti-vaccine are the people who say they are anti-
vaccine - not the people who say vaccines cause autism - although I am
sure the latter understandably includes some of the former.
Brilliant reply, Jake! Ya think? Barbara Loe Fisher is, of course,
less clumsy at dancing around difficult questions than the Boy Wonder
of the antivaccine movement. Unfortunately, he'll no doubt get better
with practice. He is, after all, very young and inexperienced in
propaganda, and it shows. In any case, the purpose of this Times
Square ad is clearly to get people to go to the NVIC website and drink
of the antivaccine crazy therein, and it's apparently been airing for
nearly two weeks. It will be airing on New Years Eve.
And Jenny McCarthy will be promoting it on Dick Clark's Rockin' New
Year's Eve. At least, she plans to try.
Take a look at the the Facebook page of the propaganda arm of the
antivaccine group Generation Rescue (screenshot sent to me by a
reader):
0 new messages