Lyme crooks knew there could never be an OspA vaccine for Lyme
Mort Zuckerman
lPick...@cdc.gov, Durlan...@yale.edu, Aa...@columbia.edu,
gary_w...@nymc.edu, scientifi...@ostp.gov,
pkru...@princeton.edu, Stanle...@fiu.edu,
emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com,
harol...@yale.edu, sedm...@nswbc.org, rrmcg...@aol.com,
fr...@nytimes.com, dpr...@stmartin.edu, saint....@sbcglobal.net
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, criminal...@usdoj.gov,
karla.d...@usdoj.gov, christophe...@usdoj.gov,
richar...@yale.edu, harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu,
inq...@aldf.com, ly...@idsociety.org, meganm...@theatlantic.com
Subject: Lyme crooks knew there could never be an OspA vaccine for
Lyme
Date: Aug 31, 2010 7:11 AM
ARTICLE BELOW ON DEER CONTROL
========================================
The Lyme crooks knew there could never be an
OspA vaccine for Lyme (1992-1995).
Here CDC officer Alan Barbour says
OspA changes from selection pressure:
http://www.actionlyme.org/BARBOUR_MUTANTS_1992.htm
Here the owner of the LYMErix patent says
an OspA vaccine for Lyme would not work:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7729870
Here Robert Schoen reports that the
Western Blots in OspA-vaccinated persons
are unreadable (can't tell if LYMErix
prevented Lyme):
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8968914
Here is the patent (the main RICO patent)
which shows that Schoen and Persing knew
Western Blots in LYMErix-vaccinated people
were unreadable:
http://patft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6045804.PN.&OS=PN/6045804&RS=PN/6045804
Here are Persing and Sigal stating that
the Western Blots in OspA-vaccinated people
were unreadable:
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/313920
Here are Schoen and Sigal stating that their
OspA vaccines prevented Lyme, using the
Dearborn (fraud) method and MarDx Western
blot strips:
LYMErix results (76% "safe and effective"):
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/339/4/209
ImmuLyme results (92% "safe and effective"):
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/abstract/339/4/216
Why were they unreadable?
Why were the blots one big smudge?
The Korean Chemists who reveal that OspA
/Pam3Cys - and the same antigen as the
HIV gp120 (gp120 is a triplicate of OspA,
but with different amino acids) - tell us
that OspA sticks to itself, creating big blobs:
http://journal.kcsnet.or.kr/main/j_search/j_download.htm?code=B961118
"tendency to aggregate"
That ^^^ means the OspA molecules were not
properly micellized in the vial.
These Lyme bastards had no idea what they
were injecting people with, but they did not
care because they had intended to lie
about the results from the beginning - from
when Steere went to Europe alone to change
the diagnostic standard, such that Lyme
become undetectable.
If Lyme is undetectable, it is untreatable
and if you can't detect Lyme (this standard
misses 85% of teh cases according to Gary
Wormers and Steere's lab, Imugen), you can't
detect VACCINE FAILURE.
Then if the vaccines failed and the person
got Lyme disease after vaccination, it would
be considered a "non-case," and that data
could be thrown out of the vaccines trials
results. Which they were.
That is exactly how they qualified LYMErix.
By throwing out vaccine failure/vaccine damage
cases.
What to do with the sick people?
TRASH THEM, using unscientific bogus
psychiatric terminology as recorded
here:
http://www.actionlyme.org/UN_PETITION.htm
Bottom Line: These mass murderers did not
tell anyone there could never be a vaccine
for Relapsing Fever (antigenic variation
or selection pressure or changing its
antigens to thwart antibody attack) and that
therefore ***the only thing anyone could do
about Relapsing Fever was to get rid of the
deer.***
They knew the truth. They knew there could
never be a vaccine against "Lyme." That's
why they changed the diagnostic standard
http://www.actionlyme.org/STEERE_IN_EUROPE.htm
through scientific ^^^ fraud.
Kaiser Permanente and the other insurance
companies freaked out when IDSA published
this:
http://www.actionlyme.org/CHP_9_IDSA_REVIEWS.htm
They knew Lyme would be more expensive to
treat than AIDS.
There is no disease more expensive to treat
than relapsing fever because it is a permanent
brain infection, which requires repeat courses
of intravenous medication (to get a high enough
concentration of the drug into the brain).
Consider how many reports generated by
the CDC and IDSA themselves which showed
that Borreliosis was a permanent brain
infection:
http://www.actionlyme.org/BRAIN_PERMANENT.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/RICOCHRON.htm
This fact was "well known" and "well established"
in 1975 and 1944.
The crime is something no one wants to deal
with because the Israelis involved will blackmail
the US Government and reveal biowarfare activities
conducted before and after Nixon promised to shut
down the operation.
That's why no one has a problem with
McSweegan, either, and he can go wherever
he wants and visit Israeli bioweapons plants
at leisure and no one stops either his
abuse of us or his crooked activities.
http://www.actionlyme.org/GOLDWATER_LETTER.htm
Nevertheless, Lyme and the 911 stunt prove
http://www.actionlyme.org/070426.htm
to THE REST OF THE WORLD, that nothing the
United States says is to be believed, no
matter what the topic.
The mechanisms of illness induction via
immune dysregulation due to vaccines,
however, has now been blown wide open,
thanks to the LYMErix catastrophe.
The United States will no longer have
a say in global disease control (or
vaccines).
KMDickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
http://www.relapsingfever.org
=====================================================
http://www.acorn-online.com/joomla15/eastoncourier/news/localnews/68770-committee-says-study-demonstrates-massive-cost-of-deer-overpopulation.html
Committee says study demonstrates massive cost of deer overpopulation
Monday, 30 August 2010 19:15
A recent study concluded that annual costs of deer overpopulation in
Fairfield County are as high as $17 million per town and $1,520 per
household, according to a Fairfield County Municipal Deer Management
Alliance (the Alliance) press release.
Deer population control advocates are hoping lawmakers will enact more
effective deer management policies and that towns and landowners will
request state Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) assistance
in reducing local deer herds, the release stated.
The economic study found that deer overpopulation costs Fairfield
County municipalities from $1.9 million to $17 million a year — with
costs in some communities as high as $1,520 per household. The study
was conducted by Peter S. Arno and Deborah Viola of New York Medical
College and commissioned by the Alliance, the Connecticut Coalition to
End Lyme Disease, and the Connecticut Audubon Society.
The study used state and federal data to determine the costs of the
most prominent impacts of deer overpopulation, including the per-case
cost of Lyme disease and vehicle-deer collision damage, and the per-
capita cost of tick control efforts and vegetation damage.
Costs to individual towns were determined by multiplying the
respective per-case or per-capita cost by the number of cases or town
residents. Lyme disease costs per case were derived from the inflation-
adjusted findings of a 2006 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
study; motor vehicle costs per claim were calculated using average
costs reported by State Farm Insurance.
According to Alliance Chairman David Streit of Redding, deer
overpopulation results in both direct and indirect economic effects.
In addition to the direct costs to households and municipalities,
Streit said, “there are also increased taxes and health and auto
insurance premiums that are passed on to individuals, resulting in
additional fees of hundreds dollars a year.”
Stephen R. Patton, landscape programs director at the Nature
Conservancy, said this study is the first of its kind to document the
economic impact of deer overpopulation. “This study demonstrates the
broader need for a comprehensive effort, managed by the DEP, to bring
deer numbers down to levels that are healthy for our woodlands and for
people,” Patton said.
Susan Frechette, DEP deputy commissioner, said that successful deer
reduction is a “landowner-driven process” and that the DEP is “ready
to assist” households and municipalities interested in pro-active deer
reduction. Few, however, have taken advantage of this resource to
date, according to the Alliance release.
Research shows that stronger deer management policies in Fairfield
County towns would significantly reduce deer overpopulation and its
associated costs — especially those associated with Lyme disease, the
release stated.
Research confirmed by Connecticut State Entomologist Kirby Stafford
demonstrates that Lyme disease is rare in areas where deer population
density is naturally below, or has been reduced below, 10 to 12 deer
per square mile, as Lyme-carrying deer ticks require their last blood
meal from a large mammal — a role played almost exclusively by deer —
in order to reproduce and lay eggs.
The DEP recognizes the value of deer management in “reducing the risk
of contracting Lyme disease and its attendant costs” and encourages
residents to contact the DEP for deer reduction assistance, the
release stated.
“The many types of currently authorized deer hunting (bow and arrow,
shotgun, muzzleloader) have been effective at reducing and maintaining
deer populations in other areas of the state,” Frechette said. “The
DEP strongly encourages towns, nonprofits and private landowners,
especially those in Fairfield County, to allow hunting on their land
during the regulated deer seasons.”
Although deer reduction programs already exist in many Fairfield
County towns, such programs function far below their potential.
“Fairfield County municipalities still do not have a good grasp of
either the prevalence of Lyme or its economic consequences to society,
as evidenced by their failure to enact aggressive deer management
policies,” said Viola, one of the study’s researchers.
Deer reduction advocates hope this study will change that by
motivating citizens to demand action from local and state elected
officials. Without public support for deer management, deer
overpopulation and its costs will only increase in severity, according
to the Alliance release.
Concerned residents are encouraged to form or join town deer
management committees and pursue the DEP’s offer of deer control
assistance.
A second phase of the study beginning this summer will interview
residents of Fairfield County to more directly capture the costs
created by deer overpopulation, such as tick-borne illnesses in pets
and losses to farmers.
KMDickson