Christopher Brauchli on (CDC's) Tobacco Science
borg...@yahoo.com
kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com, patrick.f...@usdoj.gov,
model...@sbcglobal.net, jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com,
Jgerb...@cdc.gov, len...@courant.com, michae...@po.state.ct.us,
con...@po.state.ct.us, executiv...@nytimes.com, managing-
edi...@nytimes.com, news...@nytimes.com, the-...@nytimes.com,
biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com, me...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, ubi...@courant.com, ma...@concentric.net,
camp...@courant.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, hor...@courant.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, cohen...@aol.com,
FalN...@aol.com, brans...@comcast.net, vts...@comcast.net,
o...@po.state.ct.us, da...@davila-dilzer.com,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, hor...@courant.com,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, thomas...@usdoj.gov, amcg...@rms-law.com,
rjmu...@aol.com, paulcrai...@yahoo.com,
sidney_b...@yahoo.com, criminal...@usdoj.gov,
karla.d...@usdoj.gov, christophe...@usdoj.gov
Subject: Christopher Brauchli on (CDC's) Tobacco Science
Date: Feb 10, 2008 12:40 AM
ARTICLE BELOW
-------------------------
Philip Morris and Lyme Tobacco Science:
Deceptive advertising, saying, "It is a matter of opinion whether or
not cigarettes
have nicotine and nicotine as a stimulant is addicting." (It
actually, scientifically
proven, to act like an opiate, which is smoking was always considered
a "nervous
habit," like nail-biting. It could be perceived to be an outcome of
deprivation,
like what happens to children in Corrupticut's prisons:
http://www.actionlyme.org/CHRIS_PITTMAN.htm
None of these problems are solvable by psychiatry, because they blame
their victims
and always make their victims worse. These matters of transferring
obvious primate
behavior interferes with psychiatrists' generalized penis-addiction.
Why look
at the facts when for over 100 years of this perverted nutcase entity
where opinion
trumps facts? Because lawyers and psychiatrists have the same Lying-
brain type.
They're all like Karl Rove. Whatever slithery nonsense with flies
with the
ignorant is acceptable. They accuse others of their own same
delusions. For example,
psychiatrists diagnose as delusional, what they themselves do, when
they invent
for one of their victims, that the whole world revolves around sex.
Here we see
(in the Chris Pittman complaint) with the monkey deprivation and the
children in
jails studies, that nothing has anything to do with sex. Sex is
nothing more than
a passtime, and often the OBJECT of women in that we women have to
keep men focused
on other topics. That is our job. We have to encourage men to have
other topics.
This is why men should be kept out of the health field. They have
innate capacity
to "care" for or about others and are generally brainless.
Lyme Tobacco Scientists say, "It is a matter of opinion whether or not
Lyme
is a borreliosis, permanent brain infection, and incurable with
anything."
It is not anyone's opinion, but rather the very evidence of the people
who say
Lyme is not a borreliosis, that Lyme is a borreliosis, which is why
the Borrelia-cigarette
companies, try to sell a vaccine for a disease that is so non-existent
that they
simultaneously claim that it needs no treatment.
This same opinion - which is actually not opinion but the science - is
the same
opinion the Lyme criminals refuse to turn over to the CT Attorney
General, because
it is so self-indicting:
http://www.actionlyme.org/LYME_IS_A_PERMANENT_BRAIN_INFECTION.htm
So, that's about 20 articles by the crooks, who are also playing a DNA
primers
shell game.
http://www.actionlyme.org/PRIMERSHELLGAME.htm
Here is Philip Morris hanging wid duh Lyme cabal:
http://www.actionlyme.org/OTHER_ALDF_SPONSORS.htm
You may ask yourselves, what does Lyme have to do with tobacco?
Ask the CDC since they're involved in the Lyme crimes:
http://www.actionlyme.org/CDCS_PARTICIPATION_IN_LYME_CRIMES.htm
CDC supports both Lyme Tobacco Science and plain old regular Tobacco
Science, by
all evidence, since not only does the CDC staff have patents with
SmithKline in
Europe, Allen Steere, Alan Barbour, and Mark Klempner are CDC
"officers:"
http://www.actionlyme.org/CRYME_DISEASE.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/CRYMEDISEASE_CHP3.htm
Look how many of the "persistence of the Lyme spirochete past any
number of
antibiotic therapies and treatments studies" are studies published by
CDC officers:
http://www.actionlyme.org/LYME_IS_A_PERMANENT_BRAIN_INFECTION.htm
Almost all of those 20 articles.
Kathleen M. Dickson
----------------------
Brauchli- Tobacco Science.
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/02/09/6944/
published on Saturday, February 9, 2008 by CommonDreams.org
The Cigarette
by Chrisotpher Brauchli
And a woman is only a woman,
But a good cigar is a smoke.
- Rudyard Kipling, The Betrothed, A poem inspired by an 1885 Breach of
Promise case
in which the plaintiff reportedly said: "You must choose between me
and your cigar."
It is not often I feel compelled to offer an apology to a corporation
but one is
required this week. Last week, in poking fun at Merck and Schering-
Plough for having
failed to disclose the results of their unfavorable tests of Vytorin
and Zetia,
I made fun of Phillip Morris for an ad that appeared in a 1943 issue
of The Saturday
Evening Post. The ad touted the virtues of its cigarettes and their
endorsement
by leading doctors. In describing the ad it might seem to some that I
was mocking
Phillip Morris and that was not my intention. I have nothing but
admiration for
the company and had an article in the Wall Street Journal appeared
just a few days
earlier the column would have been written differently. The WSJ
article described
all the things Phillip Morris International, (PMI) is doing to make
cigarette smoking
more attractive in those countries that have not yet concluded they
are harmful
to a smoker's health.
One of the cleverest ideas devised by Phillip Morris addresses the
undeniably difficult
problem posed for smokers in those countries where cigarette smoking
though not
frowned upon, is nonetheless not permitted with the confines of public
buildings,
thus forcing smokers to sneak outdoors to enjoy their pleasures. To
help those people,
Phillip Morris has come up with a cigarette that is the opposite of
the 1940's version
of Pall Mall cigarette. That cigarette bragged that it was 20% longer
than other
cigarettes and, therefore, healthier because, as its commercial said:
"Pall Mall's
greater length, filters the smoke on the way to your throat." No one
ever pointed
out to the maker that once the first half-inch had been smoked the
remaining length
was the same as that of its competitors and the filtering advantage
ceased to exist.
That omission was not important, however, since nothing about
cigarette advertising
is designed to appeal to reason.
The cigarette that is the opposite of the 1940's Pall Mall is called
Phillip Morris's
"Marlboro Intense." It is one-half inch shorter than ordinary
cigarettes but, according
to its advertising, packs the same carcinogenic punch (my words-not
Phillip Morris's)
as the longer variety because it is more heavily infused with whatever
it is that
gives the smoker simultaneously pleasure and cancer. According to news
of its advent
that cigarette is not only short but a bit fatter than ordinary
cigarettes. Its
advantage is that its pleasure and toxin can be inhaled in only 7
puffs whereas
ordinary cigarettes require 8 or 9 puffs to achieve the same result, a
definite
benefit for those who, being short on time, are eager to shorten their
lives as
well by getting the same effect a long cigarette would give them. That
is not the
only creativity displayed by the company. It has also created the
Heatbar, a smoke,
but also a pollution-reducing device.
Everyone knows that a by-product of smoking is a pollutant known as
"smoke." According
to the WSJ the Heatbar looks a bit like an electric toothbrush. The
cigarette is
inserted into the device and the smoker then inhales. Inhaling causes
the device
to heat up "delivering a flavored aerosol, without causing any tobacco
to burn."
It releases 90% less smoke into the atmosphere. Whether it is less
harmful to the
user is not disclosed in the article and the company's website has
distressingly
little information about what will surely be a big hit among the
environmentally
concerned smoking crowd. Although not the sort of device one would
expect to see
Humphrey Bogart pull out in To have and have not or any other films in
which he
starred, it hopes to find a place of honor in the smoker's world.
The foregoing is not intended to cast aspersions on PMI and its own
corporate site
would refute any attempt to do so. Under the rubric "Commitment to
Responsibility"
on its website, the company says it tracks "whether the company
measures up to society's
expectations of a major multinational company-and a tobacco company."
It says it
supports "strong and effective tobacco regulation for both its
products and the
industry", is "open about the health effects of smoking" and works "to
address society's
concerns about its products" and supports "minimum age laws" and
"youth smoking
prevention programs across the globe."
PMI is clearly a conscientious company and one can't fault it for
continuing to
market the only thing it knows how to make. One can only praise it for
its efforts
to improve the environment and accommodate its customers who have
found themselves
caught up in government regulations imposed by people who have never
appreciated
the pleasures that can be found in a well-timed smoke.
Christopher Brauchli
brauc...@post.harvard.edu
For political commentary see my web page