CanLyme's Response to Sci-Med Jerks (OspA is in the HIV virus/vaccine- see for yourself)
Mort Zuckerman
lPick...@cdc.gov, Durlan...@yale.edu, Aa...@columbia.edu,
gary_w...@nymc.edu, scientifi...@ostp.gov,
pkru...@princeton.edu, Stanle...@fiu.edu,
emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com,
harol...@yale.edu, sedm...@nswbc.org, rrmcg...@aol.com,
fr...@nytimes.com, dpr...@stmartin.edu, saint....@sbcglobal.net
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, criminal...@usdoj.gov,
karla.d...@usdoj.gov, christophe...@usdoj.gov,
richar...@yale.edu, harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu,
inq...@aldf.com, ly...@idsociety.org, meganm...@theatlantic.com
Subject: CanLyme's Response to Sci-Med Jerks (OspA is in the HIV virus/
vaccine- see for yourself)
Date: Jun 13, 2010 11:34 AM
ARTICLE BELOW
===================================
1) Jus aks em what OspA is.
If they can't answer that it's
the failed Tb and the failed
HIV vaccines, they can't claim
to know anything about infectious
diseases.
2) Aks em why Borrelia are ordered
by their differences in flagellin
3) and then ask, "Are these flagellar
filaments variable antigens, like the
outer surface proteins?"
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627965/pdf/10998374.pdf
"By convergent evolution, bacterial and protozoal vector-borne
pathogens have acquired similar genetic mechanisms for successful
antigenic variation. Borrelia spp. and Anaplasma marginale (among
bacteria) and African trypanosomes, Plasmodium falciparum, and Babesia
bovis (among parasites) are examples of pathogens using these
mechanisms. ***Antigenic variation poses a challenge in the
development of vaccines against vector-borne pathogens.***"
[" Uuuum. Id dat true for da
diagnosticals an vaccinicals to? "]
No one needs to pay to see any
physicians who cannot answer these
questions. There is no such thing
as "Lyme Disease."
"Lyme Disease," is as shown by this
graphic:
http://www.relapsingfever.org
taken out of the Dressler/Steere
report that is the basis for the
Dearborn "2-tiered" and antibody panel
http://www.actionlyme.org/ELISA_ARBITRARY_CUTOFF.htm
is like saying: "you need too-many T
cells" to have a "case" of AIDS.
"Lyme Disease" is an imaginary event
that took place in Europe in 1992:
http://www.actionlyme.org/STEERE_IN_EUROPE.htm
That's all it is. A name change
to go with LYMErix - the failed
Tb and HIV vaccines.
See page 3881, here:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC525594/pdf/pnas01083-0219.pdf
It's OspA ^^^ stuck on an HIV vaccine.
And here it is again:
http://journal.kcsnet.or.kr/main/j_search/j_download.htm?code=B961118
It's ^^^ OspA/HIV gp120.
http://www.actionlyme.org/Pam3Cys_Version15.htm
"We ^^^are currently using several mass
spectra techniques to characterize the
protein sequence of the Pam3Cys found
in the envelope protein of the Simian
and HIV-1. We can't use HPLC to assay
because of their tendency to aggregate
accounting for the Western Blot Smudging
seen in the failed OspA vaccine trials
and reported by allin us IDSociety.org
crooks:
http://www.actionlyme.org/DICKSON_FDA_SUBMISSION_FULL.htm
"We can't ^^^ read our Western Blots
because they're all smudged, but
take this vaccine anyway for the
dangerous, dangerous non-disease,
"Lyme Disease," that causes gliosis
or the destruction of glial cells
in the brain." - Yale's Robert Schoen:
http://www.annals.org/content/132/8/661.full.pdf+html
"...[imaginary, hysteria-induced] neuropathies
and [imaginary, hysteria-induced] Lyme meningitis
are also seen at this stage. In late-stage disease,
the central nervous [not found in wimmins because
of the Twilight Zone] system may be involved.
A new diagnostic test measuring glial fibrillary
acidic protein in cerebrospinal fluid may prove to
be a useful tool for measuring such involvement (20).
such as Mark Klempner's non-study
http://www.actionlyme.org/MKLEMPNER.htm "
These people are nuts.
Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
==========================================
http://www.fosters.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100613/GJOPINION_0102/706139997/-1/FOSOPINION
A disagreement of Lyme disease legislation
By Jim M. Wilson
President CanLyme West Kelowna, BC Canada
Sunday, June 13, 2010
This is in response to a column on Lyme disease medical legislation by
David Itkin, MD, Portsmouth, Sunday, June 6.
Although Dr. Itkin recognizes the limitations of classifying a
diagnosis into a clean definition, he still supports his society (the
Infectious Disease Society of America, IDSA) guidelines for the
diagnosis and treatment of Lyme disease that narrowly define the
illness. Of course he feels this away. He has been applying the
guidelines in his practice and may be held accountable if these
guidelines were found faulty (as they were during a two-year
investigation).
Not only do the IDSA guidelines define many of the disabling symptoms
of chronic Lyme disease as the aches and pains of daily living, they
use unsupported evidence to propose a "post" disease syndrome implying
that the infection was cured by the antibiotics, and anything left
over is simply an untreatable possible auto-immune disorder. That is
reprehensible in terms of acceptable science practices. Unsupported or
poor evidence abounds throughout the guidelines document.
Dr. Itkin further states that he does not believe legislation is
needed to allow doctors to use their best judgment. If the medical
policing bodies/licensing boards were not abusing their granted
privilege of self-policing, the laws would not be needed. However, the
abuse of the privilege is at the heart of why such legislation is
needed, to peel away some of those privileges that are being abused.
Those privileges were granted in good faith, and that good faith has
not been maintained.
Nowhere did Dr. Itkin mention that a presentation given at his
society's own conference last year showed the entire body of 68
guidelines (not only the Lyme disease guidelines) the IDSA produce has
acceptable evidence supporting the positions stated only 15% of the
time drawing into the question the entire relevancy of the IDSA as a
legitimate society.
http://www.canlyme.com/medscape_IDSA_guidelines_lack_09.html
The fact that his society self-reviewed their Lyme guidelines and
found them to be just fine, after reviewing all the evidence, is mind
boggling to those in other respected scientific organizations. This is
the exact reason legislation is needed. The IDSA dominate access to
all medical educational material on the issue of Lyme disease as
evidenced by the material taught at the medical schools, and published
by the US CDC. Legislation is the only way and means to take some of
this power away from his society.
Editor's note: The headline appearing above the commentary referred to
above was incorrect. It should have read: Lyme disease medical
legislation is the wrong choice
"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci