Proof of LORD Almighty GOD: satan made to look the fool that he is.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/8d918e9aef121e2b?
"In addition to that, your copious references to your distorted view
of
science, medicine, religion and reality generally also constitute a
severe embarrassment to Emory University, and it is notable that your
site carries no verifiable endorsements from Emory or any individual
who works there." -- satan hissing via a sockpuppet
Being openly Christian is not a distorted view but a choice.
Emory University being a Christian institution of higher learning
would be embarrassed if shown intolerant of this choice:
http://EmoryHistory.Emory.edu/
Truth is simple.
Once more, you have been soundly rebuked and shown to be the fool, in
the awesome name of LORD Jesus Christ, my Messiah and Savior.
Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Lawful steward of http://EmoryCardiology.com
Bondservant to the KING of kings and LORD of lords.
cc: Emory University :-)
The Rev Dr. Hugh Jarse NLAHN.
> Bondservant to the KING of kings and LORD of lords.
>
> cc: Emory University :-)
Go ahead. Make my day!
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> > Behold in wide-eyed wonder and amazement:
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/8d918e9aef121e2b?
> >
> > "In addition to that, your copious references to your distorted view
> > of science, medicine, religion and reality generally also constitute a
> > severe embarrassment to Emory University, and it is notable that your
> > site carries no verifiable endorsements from Emory or any individual
> > who works there." -- satan hissing via a sockpuppet
> >
> > Being openly Christian is not a distorted view but a choice.
> >
> > Emory University being a Christian institution of higher learning
> > would be embarrassed if shown intolerant of this choice:
> >
> > http://EmoryHistory.Emory.edu/
> >
> > Truth is simple.
> >
> > Once more, you have been soundly rebuked and shown to be the fool, in
> > the awesome name of LORD Jesus Christ, my Messiah and Savior.
> >
> > Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
> >
> > Andrew <><
>
Your day is over.
In the holy name of LORD Jesus Christ, my Messiah and Savior, I rebuke
you yet again, satan.
Prayerfully in the unfathomable power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
The Rev Dr. Hugh Jarse NLAHN.
Without sanity, your identifications are meaningless (One Flew Over
The Cuckoo's Nest).
>
>
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> > > Behold in wide-eyed wonder and amazement:
>
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/8d918e9aef121e2b?
>
> > > "In addition to that, your copious references to your distorted view
> > > of science, medicine, religion and reality generally also constitute a
> > > severe embarrassment to Emory University, and it is notable that your
> > > site carries no verifiable endorsements from Emory or any individual
> > > who works there." -- satan hissing via a sockpuppet
>
> > > Being openly Christian is not a distorted view but a choice.
>
> > > Emory University being a Christian institution of higher learning
> > > would be embarrassed if shown intolerant of this choice:
>
> > >http://EmoryHistory.Emory.edu/
>
> > > Truth is simple.
>
> > > Once more, you have been soundly rebuked and shown to be the fool, in
> > > the awesome name of LORD Jesus Christ, my Messiah and Savior.
>
> > > Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
>
> > > Andrew <><
>
> > Go ahead. Make my day!
>
> Your day is over.
>
No. Your stupid games are, thanks to your attempts to extort money
from your Alma Mater.
> In the holy name of LORD Jesus Christ, my Messiah and Savior, I rebuke
> you yet again, satan.
>
> Prayerfully in the unfathomable power and might of the Holy Spirit,
>
> Andrew <><
> --
> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Raving nutcase
The game is up. Your demands for $550,000 are the last desperate act
of a rogue doctor on his way to some form of non-voluntary custody.
flyingrat
heart...@emorycardiology.com says...
> Behold in wide-eyed wonder and amazement:
Andrew Chung:
Is a frequent and proven liar (evidence archived forever on Google)
Has lost numerous NNTP accounts with supernews and others, has had many
Google accounts nuked, and his vanity domain heartmdphd.com is now
banned from setting up accounts. He is instead using multiple Google
sock accounts and email addresses in the format love#@thetruth.com (#
being a number)
Is unemployed after being sacked with cause from his one and only job
after just over 80 days
Fled the state of Florida, and now claims to practice in Georgia despite
having no admission priveliges in the State's hospitals
Runs a phony foundation with a total declared income of circa $200, the
ownership and contact details of which are obfuscated on its website
Makes failed prophecies concerning earthquakes with areas and dates,
which don't happen (remember the bible quotes about false prophets)
Performed a public attempt at 'exorcising' a Malaysian sock on usenet,
then denied doing it. He has recently reversed position again and admits
to practicing exorcism by usenet, proving himself a liar in the process.
Promotes a dangerous diet, with a million dollar guarantee that he
demands thirty dollars to access details of. This despite being
unemployed. His soliciting and spamming for donations looks to be
similar to the Nigerian Advance Fee Fraud, where victims pay money
upfront in the hope of coming into riches but find they have merely
bought into a lie. Part of his advice is to pour nail polish remover onto food.
Declares he has a cardiology practice despite posting night and day from
the same IP address (his home presumably) or a coffee shop internet cafe
Makes further false prophecies that we should now be all dying in a bird
flu pandemic. When these fail to happen, he does them all over again and
changes the dates. Nuclear war is another Chung spciality, which
naturally doesn't happen when he says it is going to.
Worships evil hatemonger Fred Phelps and will not denounce the acts of
Westboro's congregation. He even accuses someone with the name Phelps of
being Fred's son and refuses to accept he is completely wrong.
Uses the same patter as Pat Robertson, indicating his religious activity
is confined to watching cable TV. No evidence Chung has ever attended a
church.
Has a tendency to cyberstalk, particularly women. His wife fled some
time ago to another state, an act which Chung tries to pass off as "being
on vacation".
Frequently passes himself off as being qualified in areas such as
endocrinology, despite making incredibly fundamental blunders in his
'advice'. It is no wonder the Florida heart facility terminated him, and
has publicly denounced his version of events. Again archived on Google.
Don't forget the fake fast, where he didn't lose any weight, as well as
the infamous 666 stamping fiasco. His latest vile trick is spamming the
blogs of dying cancer patients and then crowing triumphantly when they
pass away.
flyingrat
heart...@emorycardiology.com says...
> In the holy name of LORD Jesus Christ, my Messiah and Savior, I rebuke
> you yet again, satan.
Hell hath no fury like a cardiologist without patients
tr...@is-best.com
> of science, medicine, religion and reality generally also constitute a
> severe embarrassment to Emory University, and it is notable that your
> site carries no verifiable endorsements from Emory or any individual
> who works there."
"Being openly Christian is not a distorted view but a choice.
Emory University being a Christian institution of higher learning
would be embarrassed if shown intolerant of this choice:"
Another strawman and red herring, this failure of logic another
embarisment for emory.
He said nothing of your proclamation of faith but the clear poor
examples of validity in science and medicine and religion. "Religion"
in this case meaning the false teachings in the sense of theology you
present. I too have been doing this very thing also for some time. To
correct you and to warn others not to be taken in by the mistakes is a
worthy goal.
Proclaim your faith all you wish, no one is stopping you. But just as
freely we will proclaim your failures in science and medicine and
religion.
God bless.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > satan via a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) hissed:
> >
> > > > Behold in wide-eyed wonder and amazement:
> >
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/8d918e9aef121e2b?
> >
> > > > "In addition to that, your copious references to your distorted view
> > > > of science, medicine, religion and reality generally also constitute a
> > > > severe embarrassment to Emory University, and it is notable that your
> > > > site carries no verifiable endorsements from Emory or any individual
> > > > who works there." -- satan hissing via a sockpuppet
> >
> > > > Being openly Christian is not a distorted view but a choice.
> >
> > > > Emory University being a Christian institution of higher learning
> > > > would be embarrassed if shown intolerant of this choice:
> >
> > > >http://EmoryHistory.Emory.edu/
> >
> > > > Truth is simple.
> >
> > > > Once more, you have been soundly rebuked and shown to be the fool, in
> > > > the awesome name of LORD Jesus Christ, my Messiah and Savior.
> >
> > > > Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
> >
> > > > Andrew <><
> >
> > > Go ahead. Make my day!
> >
> > Your day is over.
>
> No.
That has not stopped the lake of fire being readied for you.
In the Holy and precious name of LORD Jesus Christ, my Messiah and
Saviour, I soundly rebuke you again, satan.
Prayerfully in the fantastic power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Lawful steward of http://EmoryCardiology.com
The Rev Dr. Hugh Jarse NLAHN.
<heartdo...@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Lawful steward ofhttp://EmoryCardiology.com
Here's the W3C validation output for the main frame:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Validation Output: 17 Errors
1. Error Line 1, Column 0: no document type declaration; implying
"<!DOCTYPE HTML SYSTEM>".
<html>
The checked page did not contain a document type ("DOCTYPE")
declaration. The Validator has tried to validate with a fallback DTD,
but this is quite likely to be incorrect and will generate a large
number of incorrect error messages. It is highly recommended that you
insert the proper DOCTYPE declaration in your document -- instructions
for doing this are given above -- and it is necessary to have this
declaration before the page can be declared to be valid.
2. Error Line 18, Column 14: required attribute "ALT" not
specified.
<img src=http://HeartMDPhD.com/gifs/owl.gif alt="HeartMDPhD
Logo" border=0 heigh
The attribute given above is required for an element that you've
used, but you have omitted it. For instance, in most HTML and XHTML
document types the "type" attribute is required on the "script"
element and the "alt" attribute is required for the "img" element.
Typical values for type are type="text/css" for <style> and
type="text/javascript" for <script>.
3. Error Line 23, Column 26: an attribute value must be a literal
unless it contains only name characters.
<p><h1><STRONG><font SIZE=+4>Tribute to Emory Cardiology</font></
STRONG></h1><...
You have used a character that is not considered a "name
character" in an attribute value. Which characters are considered
"name characters" varies between the different document types, but a
good rule of thumb is that unless the value contains only lower or
upper case letters in the range a-z you must put quotation marks
around the value. In fact, unless you have extreme file size
requirements it is a very very good idea to always put quote marks
around your attribute values. It is never wrong to do so, and very
often it is absolutely necessary.
4. Error Line 23, Column 80: end tag for element "P" which is not
open.
...ry Cardiology</font></STRONG></h1></p>
The Validator found an end tag for the above element, but that
element is not currently open. This is often caused by a leftover end
tag from an element that was removed during editing, or by an
implicitly closed element (if you have an error related to an element
being used where it is not allowed, this is almost certainly the
case). In the latter case this error will disappear as soon as you fix
the original problem.
If this error occurred in a script section of your document, you
should probably read this FAQ entry.
5. Warning Line 73, Column 71: cannot generate system identifier
for general entity "i".
.../guest/control.guest?u=drandrewchung&i=1002&a=view"><IMG SRC="./
gifs/guestboo
An entity reference was found in the document, but there is no
reference by that name defined. Often this is caused by misspelling
the reference name, unencoded ampersands, or by leaving off the
trailing semicolon (;). The most common cause of this error is
unencoded ampersands in URLs as described by the WDG in "Ampersands in
URLs".
Entity references start with an ampersand (&) and end with a
semicolon (;). If you want to use a literal ampersand in your document
you must encode it as "&" (even inside URLs!). Be careful to end
entity references with a semicolon or your entity reference may get
interpreted in connection with the following text. Also keep in mind
that named entity references are case-sensitive; &Aelig; and æ
are different characters.
If this error appears in some markup generated by PHP's session
handling code, this article has explanations and solutions to your
problem.
Note that in most documents, errors related to entity references
will trigger up to 5 separate messages from the Validator. Usually
these will all disappear when the original problem is fixed.
6. Error Line 73, Column 71: general entity "i" not defined and no
default entity.
.../guest/control.guest?u=drandrewchung&i=1002&a=view"><IMG SRC="./
gifs/guestboo
This is usually a cascading error caused by a an undefined
entity reference or use of an unencoded ampersand (&) in an URL or
body text. See the previous message for further details.
7. Error Line 73, Column 72: reference to entity "i" for which no
system identifier could be generated.
...guest/control.guest?u=drandrewchung&i=1002&a=view"><IMG SRC="./
gifs/guestbook
This is usually a cascading error caused by a an undefined
entity reference or use of an unencoded ampersand (&) in an URL or
body text. See the previous message for further details.
8. Info Line 73, Column 70: entity was defined here.
...m/guest/control.guest?u=drandrewchung&i=1002&a=view"><IMG
SRC="./gifs/guestbo
9. Warning Line 73, Column 78: cannot generate system identifier
for general entity "a".
...control.guest?u=drandrewchung&i=1002&a=view"><IMG SRC="./gifs/
guestbook.butto
An entity reference was found in the document, but there is no
reference by that name defined. Often this is caused by misspelling
the reference name, unencoded ampersands, or by leaving off the
trailing semicolon (;). The most common cause of this error is
unencoded ampersands in URLs as described by the WDG in "Ampersands in
URLs".
Entity references start with an ampersand (&) and end with a
semicolon (;). If you want to use a literal ampersand in your document
you must encode it as "&" (even inside URLs!). Be careful to end
entity references with a semicolon or your entity reference may get
interpreted in connection with the following text. Also keep in mind
that named entity references are case-sensitive; &Aelig; and æ
are different characters.
If this error appears in some markup generated by PHP's session
handling code, this article has explanations and solutions to your
problem.
Note that in most documents, errors related to entity references
will trigger up to 5 separate messages from the Validator. Usually
these will all disappear when the original problem is fixed.
10. Error Line 73, Column 78: general entity "a" not defined and no
default entity.
...control.guest?u=drandrewchung&i=1002&a=view"><IMG SRC="./gifs/
guestbook.butto
This is usually a cascading error caused by a an undefined
entity reference or use of an unencoded ampersand (&) in an URL or
body text. See the previous message for further details.
11. Error Line 73, Column 79: reference to entity "a" for which no
system identifier could be generated.
...ontrol.guest?u=drandrewchung&i=1002&a=view"><IMG SRC="./gifs/
guestbook.button
This is usually a cascading error caused by a an undefined
entity reference or use of an unencoded ampersand (&) in an URL or
body text. See the previous message for further details.
12. Info Line 73, Column 77: entity was defined here.
.../control.guest?u=drandrewchung&i=1002&a=view"><IMG SRC="./gifs/
guestbook.butt
13. Error Line 92, Column 2: document type does not allow element
"P" here; missing one of "APPLET", "OBJECT", "MAP", "IFRAME", "BUTTON"
start-tag.
<p><IMG hspace=10 align=left width=84 height=116 SRC='./gifs/
clock.gif' alt='Th
The mentioned element is not allowed to appear in the context in
which you've placed it; the other mentioned elements are the only ones
that are both allowed there and can contain the element mentioned.
This might mean that you need a containing element, or possibly that
you've forgotten to close a previous element.
One possible cause for this message is that you have attempted
to put a block-level element (such as "<p>" or "<table>") inside an
inline element (such as "<a>", "<span>", or "<font>").
14. Error Line 106, Column 81: end tag for element "A" which is not
open.
...html target="_blank">COURAGE Trial</a>
The Validator found an end tag for the above element, but that
element is not currently open. This is often caused by a leftover end
tag from an element that was removed during editing, or by an
implicitly closed element (if you have an error related to an element
being used where it is not allowed, this is almost certainly the
case). In the latter case this error will disappear as soon as you fix
the original problem.
If this error occurred in a script section of your document, you
should probably read this FAQ entry.
15. Error Line 110, Column 79: end tag for element "A" which is not
open.
...et="_blank">Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD</a><br>
The Validator found an end tag for the above element, but that
element is not currently open. This is often caused by a leftover end
tag from an element that was removed during editing, or by an
implicitly closed element (if you have an error related to an element
being used where it is not allowed, this is almost certainly the
case). In the latter case this error will disappear as soon as you fix
the original problem.
If this error occurred in a script section of your document, you
should probably read this FAQ entry.
16. Error Line 112, Column 80: end tag for element "A" which is not
open.
...BeHungry target="_blank">Be Hungry</a></b> (now in its second
printing!)<br>
The Validator found an end tag for the above element, but that
element is not currently open. This is often caused by a leftover end
tag from an element that was removed during editing, or by an
implicitly closed element (if you have an error related to an element
being used where it is not allowed, this is almost certainly the
case). In the latter case this error will disappear as soon as you fix
the original problem.
If this error occurred in a script section of your document, you
should probably read this FAQ entry.
17. Error Line 114, Column 3: end tag for element "P" which is not
open.
</p>
The Validator found an end tag for the above element, but that
element is not currently open. This is often caused by a leftover end
tag from an element that was removed during editing, or by an
implicitly closed element (if you have an error related to an element
being used where it is not allowed, this is almost certainly the
case). In the latter case this error will disappear as soon as you fix
the original problem.
If this error occurred in a script section of your document, you
should probably read this FAQ entry.
18. Error Line 154, Column 64: an attribute value must be a literal
unless it contains only name characters.
...mall>You are visitor number <img src=/cgi-bin/counter.exe?-
f0000FF+-t0+index.
You have used a character that is not considered a "name
character" in an attribute value. Which characters are considered
"name characters" varies between the different document types, but a
good rule of thumb is that unless the value contains only lower or
upper case letters in the range a-z you must put quotation marks
around the value. In fact, unless you have extreme file size
requirements it is a very very good idea to always put quote marks
around your attribute values. It is never wrong to do so, and very
often it is absolutely necessary.
19. Error Line 154, Column 122: value of attribute "ALIGN" cannot be
"CENTER"; must be one of "TOP", "MIDDLE", "BOTTOM", "LEFT", "RIGHT".
...-f0000FF+-t0+index.html align="center"> since February 3rd,
2007.</small></sm
The value of the attribute is defined to be one of a list of
possible values but in the document it contained something that is not
allowed for that type of attribute. For instance, the "selected"
attribute must be either minimized as "selected" or spelled out in
full as "selected="selected""; a value like "selected="true"" is not
allowed.
20. Error Line 154, Column 123: required attribute "ALT" not
specified.
...f0000FF+-t0+index.html align="center"> since February 3rd,
2007.</small></sma
The attribute given above is required for an element that you've
used, but you have omitted it. For instance, in most HTML and XHTML
document types the "type" attribute is required on the "script"
element and the "alt" attribute is required for the "img" element.
Typical values for type are type="text/css" for <style> and
type="text/javascript" for <script>.
21. Error Line 197, Column 11: end tag for element "P" which is not
open.
</TABLE></p>
The Validator found an end tag for the above element, but that
element is not currently open. This is often caused by a leftover end
tag from an element that was removed during editing, or by an
implicitly closed element (if you have an error related to an element
being used where it is not allowed, this is almost certainly the
case). In the latter case this error will disappear as soon as you fix
the original problem.
If this error occurred in a script section of your document, you
should probably read this FAQ entry.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bottomline: the stewardship of this domain name has been handled with
breathtaking incompetence.
JESUS WAS A COCKSUCKER!
"The Rev Dr. Hugh Jarse NLAHN." <hugh....@heathens.org.uk> wrote in
message news:1190491881....@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
Don Kirkman
article <1190454685....@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com>:
>Emory University being a Christian institution of higher learning
>would be embarrassed if shown intolerant of this choice:
>http://EmoryHistory.Emory.edu/
>Truth is simple.
The simple truth is that the Wesleys, the founders of Methodism, would
be outraged at your version of Christianity. So would the faculty of
Emory's School of Theology, even though it was the birthplace of the now
almost forgotten "death of God" theological fad. You could have saved
yourself much abuse in newsgroups, as well as much wandering in the
theological deserts and wildernesses, if you had chatted with some of
the professors in the University about these matters. Ignorance is
seldom bliss.
--
Don Kirkman
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> >would be embarrassed if shown intolerant of this choice:
>
> >http://EmoryHistory.Emory.edu/
>
> >Truth is simple.
>
> The simple truth is that the Wesleys, the founders of Methodism, would
> be outraged at your version of Christianity.
Incorrect.
They were just as evangelical and led by the Holy Spirit to preach to
the native American Indians here in Georgia.
http://gbgm-umc.org/umw/wesley/shorthistory.stm
Similarly, I have been led by the Holy Spirit to inform folks as a
physician about the wisdom of placing ones faith in LORD Jesus Christ
to receive HIS salvation:
> So would the faculty of
> Emory's School of Theology, even though it was the birthplace of the now
> almost forgotten "death of God" theological fad.
They remain tolerant of each person's walk with Christ or even walk
without Christ as the case is for the Dalai Lama:
http://www.dalailama.emory.edu/
> You could have saved
> yourself much abuse in newsgroups, as well as much wandering in the
> theological deserts and wildernesses, if you had chatted with some of
> the professors in the University about these matters.
You make the erroneous assumption that I have not.
Such is the spirit of error (self) that guides you.
> Ignorance is seldom bliss.
Indeed.
Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for HIS compelling
you to unwittingly gaze into the mirror at your own reflection.
Many times GOD also compelled dearly departed Bob Pastorio to peer
into the mirror at his own reflection:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/libel.asp
Bob definitely knows Who is the truth now just as you will know in
time:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/Bob
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:
http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/PressRelease
Cary Kittrell
> Behold in wide-eyed wonder and amazement:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/8d918e9aef121e2b?
>
> "In addition to that, your copious references to your distorted view
> of
> science, medicine, religion and reality generally also constitute a
> severe embarrassment to Emory University, and it is notable that your
> site carries no verifiable endorsements from Emory or any individual
> who works there." -- satan hissing via a sockpuppet
>
> Being openly Christian is not a distorted view but a choice.
>
> Emory University being a Christian institution of higher learning
> would be embarrassed if shown intolerant of this choice:
>
> http://EmoryHistory.Emory.edu/
>
> Truth is simple.
>
> Once more, you have been soundly rebuked
If he truly had been "soundly rebuked", once would
have sufficed.
-- cary
Cary Kittrell
WHAT?
Dr. Hugh? Is that you?
But...but...but... you've been "soundly rebuked". However is
it possible that you're still here? That just cannot be!
Are we imagining you?
It's a miracle, folks, a bona fide miracle.
-- cary
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/8d918e9aef121e2b?
> >
> > "In addition to that, your copious references to your distorted view
> > of
> > science, medicine, religion and reality generally also constitute a
> > severe embarrassment to Emory University, and it is notable that your
> > site carries no verifiable endorsements from Emory or any individual
> > who works there." -- satan hissing via a sockpuppet
> >
> > Being openly Christian is not a distorted view but a choice.
> >
> > Emory University being a Christian institution of higher learning
> > would be embarrassed if shown intolerant of this choice:
> >
> > http://EmoryHistory.Emory.edu/
> >
> > Truth is simple.
> >
> > Once more, you have been soundly rebuked
>
> If he truly had been "soundly rebuked", once would
> have sufficed.
That would be the case for being annihilated rather than being rebuked
soundly or otherwise.
This simply shows that the Holy Spirit is absolutely right to convict
you:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:
http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/PressRelease
Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Lawful steward of http://EmoryCardiology.com
Bondservant to the KING of kings and LORD of lords.
>
> -- cary
Don Kirkman
>convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
>> The simple truth is that the Wesleys, the founders of Methodism, would
>> be outraged at your version of Christianity.
>Incorrect.
>They were just as evangelical and led by the Holy Spirit to preach to
>the native American Indians here in Georgia.
Half credit. They were indeed "evangelical," and were very strict about
getting the theology right. Even some fellow Methodists found it hard
to persuade the Wesleys of their own orthodoxy. By Wesley standards you
are not evangelical but heretical.
>http://gbgm-umc.org/umw/wesley/shorthistory.stm
>Similarly, I have been led by the Holy Spirit to inform folks as a
>physician about the wisdom of placing ones faith in LORD Jesus Christ
>to receive HIS salvation:
Your information is quite different from what the Wesleys and other
great Methodist leaders taught. I stand by my statement.
>> So would the faculty of
>> Emory's School of Theology, even though it was the birthplace of the now
>> almost forgotten "death of God" theological fad.
>They remain tolerant of each person's walk with Christ or even walk
>without Christ as the case is for the Dalai Lama:
Irrelevant. They did not tolerate the Dalai Lama because he felt called
by the Holy Spirit to "inform" the unwilling willy nilly, but because an
openness to the teachings of others can edify; this is another area in
which you fall short.
>> You could have saved
>> yourself much abuse in newsgroups, as well as much wandering in the
>> theological deserts and wildernesses, if you had chatted with some of
>> the professors in the University about these matters.
>You make the erroneous assumption that I have not.
If you had you would not be so far from current Christian theology in
your subjective "informing" endeavors.
--
Don Kirkman
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
>
> >> The simple truth is that the Wesleys, the founders of Methodism, would
> >> be outraged at your version of Christianity.
>
> >Incorrect.
>
> >They were just as evangelical and led by the Holy Spirit to preach to
> >the native American Indians here in Georgia.
> >
>
> Half credit. They were indeed "evangelical," and were very strict about
> getting the theology right. Even some fellow Methodists found it hard
> to persuade the Wesleys of their own orthodoxy. By Wesley standards you
> are not evangelical but heretical.
Without the LORD, your opinion is meaningless (Ecclesiastes).
> >Similarly, I have been led by the Holy Spirit to inform folks as a
> >physician about the wisdom of placing ones faith in LORD Jesus Christ
> >to receive HIS salvation:
> >
> > http://HeartMDPhD.com/Healer
>
> Your information is quite different from what the Wesleys and other
> great Methodist leaders taught.
What the Holy Spirit guides us to teach is salvation through faith in
LORD Jesus Christ.
", they began to be convinced, that "by grace we are saved through
faith;" that justification by faith was the doctrine of the Church, as
well as of the Bible. As soon as they believed, they spake; salvation
by faith being now their standing topic. Indeed this implied three
things:
(1.) That men are all, by nature, "dead in sin," and, consequently,
"children of wrath."
(2.) That they are "justified by faith alone."
(3.) That faith produces inward and outward holiness: And these points
they insisted on day and night. In a short time they became popular
Preachers. The congregations were large wherever they preached. The
former name was then revived; and all these gentlemen, with their
followers, were entitled Methodists."
Source:
http://gbgm-umc.org/umw/wesley/shorthistory.stm
> I stand by my statement.
You don't have a leg to stand on without faith in LORD Jesus Christ.
Let there be no doubt that there is unity in the Holy Spirit for all
of Jesus' brethren irrespective of denomination.
> >> So would the faculty of
> >> Emory's School of Theology, even though it was the birthplace of the now
> >> almost forgotten "death of God" theological fad.
>
> > They remain tolerant of each person's walk with Christ or even walk
> > without Christ as the case is for the Dalai Lama:
> >
> > http://www.dalailama.emory.edu/
>
> Irrelevant.
Relevant to your claim that present-day Emory University is involved
in judging folks to be heretical.
> They did not tolerate the Dalai Lama because he felt called
> by the Holy Spirit to "inform" the unwilling willy nilly, but because an
> openness to the teachings of others can edify; this is another area in
> which you fall short.
Without the LORD, your opinion remains meaningless (Ecclesiates).
In the interim, it remains my choice to continue to receive the
guidance of the Holy Spirit in everything I say, do, and write.
To GOD belongs all the praise and glory for the good works HE planned
in advance for me to do, has guided and continues to guide me to
complete:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/PressRelease
> >> You could have saved
> >> yourself much abuse in newsgroups, as well as much wandering in the
> >> theological deserts and wildernesses, if you had chatted with some of
> >> the professors in the University about these matters.
>
> >You make the erroneous assumption that I have not.
>
> If you had you would not be so far from current Christian theology in
> your subjective "informing" endeavors.
It is clear that unity in the Holy Spirit is an alien concept to you.
"Just as I am not of this world, you are no longer of this world." --
LORD Jesus Christ to HIS brethren.
Amen.
Don Kirkman
>convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> >convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
>> >> The simple truth is that the Wesleys, the founders of Methodism, would
>> >> be outraged at your version of Christianity.
>> >Incorrect.
>> >They were just as evangelical and led by the Holy Spirit to preach to
>> >the native American Indians here in Georgia.
>> Half credit. They were indeed "evangelical," and were very strict about
>> getting the theology right. Even some fellow Methodists found it hard
>> to persuade the Wesleys of their own orthodoxy. By Wesley standards you
>> are not evangelical but heretical.
>Without the LORD, your opinion is meaningless (Ecclesiastes).
Out of the mists of time seems to come a lone voice crying "Without the
Lord your opinion is meaningless." It seems to me I've heard that
song before.
>> I stand by my statement.
>> >> So would the faculty of
>> >> Emory's School of Theology, even though it was the birthplace of the now
>> >> almost forgotten "death of God" theological fad.
>> > They remain tolerant of each person's walk with Christ or even walk
>> > without Christ as the case is for the Dalai Lama:
>> > http://www.dalailama.emory.edu/
>> Irrelevant.
>Relevant to your claim that present-day Emory University is involved
>in judging folks to be heretical.
I made no such claim; I said you are heretical by the standards of the
Wesleys.
>> They did not tolerate the Dalai Lama because he felt called
>> by the Holy Spirit to "inform" the unwilling willy nilly, but because an
>> openness to the teachings of others can edify; this is another area in
>> which you fall short.
>Without the LORD, your opinion remains meaningless (Ecclesiates).
The last refuge of a charlatan is endless rote repetition of meaningless
platitudes.
>In the interim, it remains my choice to continue to receive the
>guidance of the Holy Spirit in everything I say, do, and write.
>> If you had you would not be so far from current Christian theology in
>> your subjective "informing" endeavors.
>It is clear that unity in the Holy Spirit is an alien concept to you.
Not at all; it's just that there is no evidence in your theology or your
behavior as shown by events in Florida or in your superficial writings
that you have any part in "unity in the Holy Spirit."
--
Don Kirkman
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >> >convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
>
> >> >> The simple truth is that the Wesleys, the founders of Methodism, would
> >> >> be outraged at your version of Christianity.
>
> >> >Incorrect.
>
> >> >They were just as evangelical and led by the Holy Spirit to preach to
> >> >the native American Indians here in Georgia.
>
> >> Half credit. They were indeed "evangelical," and were very strict about
> >> getting the theology right. Even some fellow Methodists found it hard
> >> to persuade the Wesleys of their own orthodoxy. By Wesley standards you
> >> are not evangelical but heretical.
>
> >Without the LORD, your opinion is meaningless (Ecclesiastes).
>
> Out of the mists of time seems to come a lone voice crying "Without the
> Lord your opinion is meaningless." It seems to me I've heard that
> song before.
That would be your overactive imagination, which has been noted
earlier.
> >> I stand by my statement.
>
> >> >> So would the faculty of
> >> >> Emory's School of Theology, even though it was the birthplace of the now
> >> >> almost forgotten "death of God" theological fad.
>
> >> > They remain tolerant of each person's walk with Christ or even walk
> >> > without Christ as the case is for the Dalai Lama:
>
> >> > http://www.dalailama.emory.edu/
>
> >> Irrelevant.
>
> >Relevant to your claim that present-day Emory University is involved
> >in judging folks to be heretical.
>
> I made no such claim; I said you are heretical by the standards of the
> Wesleys.
Inferential claims are claims nonetheless.
> >> They did not tolerate the Dalai Lama because he felt called
> >> by the Holy Spirit to "inform" the unwilling willy nilly, but because an
> >> openness to the teachings of others can edify; this is another area in
> >> which you fall short.
>
> >Without the LORD, your opinion remains meaningless (Ecclesiastes).
>
> The last refuge of a charlatan is endless rote repetition of meaningless
> platitudes.
Irrelevant since I am not a charlatan and an understanding of
Ecclesiastes is not a meaningless platitude.
You keep reminding me of our dearly departed Bob Pastorio who died
inauspiciously on Fool's Day:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/libel.asp
> >In the interim, it remains my choice to continue to receive the
> >guidance of the Holy Spirit in everything I say, do, and write.
>
> >> If you had you would not be so far from current Christian theology in
> >> your subjective "informing" endeavors.
>
> >It is clear that unity in the Holy Spirit is an alien concept to you.
>
> Not at all;
It is for the discerning.
> it's just that there is no evidence in your theology or your
> behavior as shown by events in Florida
The Holy Spirit is after all the Spirit of Truth.
HE made me able to resist all employer demands to falsify the medical
records of my patients to the point of insubordination forcing
termination.
> or in your superficial writings
> that you have any part in "unity in the Holy Spirit."
Again, without the LORD, not only is your opinion meaningless but
every other aspect of your entire 80 years of life is meaningless
(Ecclesiastes).
You really do not have much longer, dear Don.
Would suggest you repent now:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/TheWay
The way of Bob (this one) Pastorio is clearly the wrong way:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/Bob
Cary Kittrell
>
> It seems to me I heard somewhere that Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote in
> article <1190684850.1...@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>:
>
> >convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >> >convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
>
> >> >> The simple truth is that the Wesleys, the founders of Methodism, would
> >> >> be outraged at your version of Christianity.
>
> >> >Incorrect.
>
> >> >They were just as evangelical and led by the Holy Spirit to preach to
> >> >the native American Indians here in Georgia.
>
> >> Half credit. They were indeed "evangelical," and were very strict about
> >> getting the theology right. Even some fellow Methodists found it hard
> >> to persuade the Wesleys of their own orthodoxy. By Wesley standards you
> >> are not evangelical but heretical.
>
> >Without the LORD, your opinion is meaningless (Ecclesiastes).
>
> Out of the mists of time seems to come a lone voice crying "Without the
> Lord your opinion is meaningless." It seems to me I've heard that
> song before.
Oh. No, I'm sorry, but you're almost certainly mistaken about that one.
Because, as it is written:
"My posts have not been repetitious" -- A.B. Chung, 2007
-- cary
Don Kirkman
>convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> >convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
>> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> >> >convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
>> >> >> The simple truth is that the Wesleys, the founders of Methodism, would
>> >> >> be outraged at your version of Christianity.
>> >> >Incorrect.
>> >> >They were just as evangelical and led by the Holy Spirit to preach to
>> >> >the native American Indians here in Georgia.
>> >> Half credit. They were indeed "evangelical," and were very strict about
>> >> getting the theology right. Even some fellow Methodists found it hard
>> >> to persuade the Wesleys of their own orthodoxy. By Wesley standards you
>> >> are not evangelical but heretical.
>> >Without the LORD, your opinion is meaningless (Ecclesiastes).
>> Out of the mists of time seems to come a lone voice crying "Without the
>> Lord your opinion is meaningless." It seems to me I've heard that
>> song before.
>That would be your overactive imagination, which has been noted
>earlier.
No, that would be your lack of imagination that prevents you from
recognizing a burlesque of your daily behavior.
>> >Relevant to your claim that present-day Emory University is involved
>> >in judging folks to be heretical.
>> I made no such claim; I said you are heretical by the standards of the
>> Wesleys.
>Inferential claims are claims nonetheless.
Yes, but the claims are untrue unless the inference is well-founded. You
lie and lose again.
>> >Without the LORD, your opinion remains meaningless (Ecclesiastes).
>> The last refuge of a charlatan is endless rote repetition of meaningless
>> platitudes.
>Irrelevant since I am not a charlatan and an understanding of
>Ecclesiastes is not a meaningless platitude.
No charlatan will admit it--that's part of the secret of his success.
And as you've been told repeatedly, you have no understanding of
Ecclesiastes. You have never answered requests for an exact citation to
the text of Ecclesiastes that says what you falsely claim it does.
>You keep reminding me of our dearly departed Bob Pastorio who died
>inauspiciously on Fool's Day:
And I've thanked you for mentioning that, since he was a principled,
thoughtful man who could not abide those who put forth corrupted science
and corrupted religion.
And to you he was never "dearly departed Bob Pastorio" until he died, as
the long record of clashes between the two of you shows. Bob stood up
to you with undeniable facts, and you despised him for it.
>http://HeartMDPhD.com/libel.asp
QED
>> >In the interim, it remains my choice to continue to receive the
>> >guidance of the Holy Spirit in everything I say, do, and write.
>> >> If you had you would not be so far from current Christian theology in
>> >> your subjective "informing" endeavors.
>> >It is clear that unity in the Holy Spirit is an alien concept to you.
>> Not at all; it's just that there is no evidence in your theology or your
>> behavior as shown by events in Florida
Or, as *I* wrote, "Not at all; it's just that there is no evidence in
your theology or your behavior as shown by events in Florida or in your
superficial writings that you have any part in "unity in the Holy
Spirit."
>The Holy Spirit is after all the Spirit of Truth.
Yes, but both truth and the Holy Spirit are strangers to you.
>HE made me able to resist all employer demands to falsify the medical
>records of my patients to the point of insubordination forcing
>termination.
Repeating the lie won't cut it.
>> or in your superficial writings
>> that you have any part in "unity in the Holy Spirit."
>Again, without the LORD, not only is your opinion meaningless but
>every other aspect of your entire 80 years of life is meaningless
>(Ecclesiastes).
Another lie.
>You really do not have much longer, dear Don.
I have as long as I'm allowed, and nothing you say or do can change
that.
>Would suggest you repent now:
Would suggest you butt out, since you know absolutely nothing about my
religious beliefs or practices.
>http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/TheWay
I'll take my theology from experts, not from a failed physician.
>The way of Bob (this one) Pastorio is clearly the wrong way:
>http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/Bob
Another exemplar of your petty and malicious self.
--
Don Kirkman
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >> >convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
> >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >> >> >convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
>
> >> >> >> The simple truth is that the Wesleys, the founders of Methodism, would
> >> >> >> be outraged at your version of Christianity.
>
> >> >> >Incorrect.
>
> >> >> >They were just as evangelical and led by the Holy Spirit to preach to
> >> >> >the native American Indians here in Georgia.
>
> >> >> Half credit. They were indeed "evangelical," and were very strict about
> >> >> getting the theology right. Even some fellow Methodists found it hard
> >> >> to persuade the Wesleys of their own orthodoxy. By Wesley standards you
> >> >> are not evangelical but heretical.
>
> >> >Without the LORD, your opinion is meaningless (Ecclesiastes).
>
> >> Out of the mists of time seems to come a lone voice crying "Without the
> >> Lord your opinion is meaningless." It seems to me I've heard that
> >> song before.
>
> >That would be your overactive imagination, which has been noted
> >earlier.
>
> No, that would be your lack of imagination that prevents you from
> recognizing a burlesque of your daily behavior.
It would be your bitterness that leads you to believe that your
burlesque is not a product of your own overactive imagination.
> >> >Relevant to your claim that present-day Emory University is involved
> >> >in judging folks to be heretical.
>
> >> I made no such claim; I said you are heretical by the standards of the
> >> Wesleys.
>
> >Inferential claims are claims nonetheless.
>
> Yes
Glad you agree.
>, but the claims are untrue unless the inference is well-founded.
Did not write that your claims were true.
> You lie and lose again.
Not for the discerning.
> >> >Without the LORD, your opinion remains meaningless (Ecclesiastes).
>
> >> The last refuge of a charlatan is endless rote repetition of meaningless
> >> platitudes.
>
> >Irrelevant since I am not a charlatan and an understanding of
> >Ecclesiastes is not a meaningless platitude.
>
> No charlatan will admit it-
Nor will a non-charlatan write that they are a charlatan.
> -that's part of the secret of his success.
It seems that you would be the expert here about being a charlatan
since between us, you are the one without a medical license.
Truth is simple.
This victory belongs to LORD Almighty GOD because HE made me a
physician and you a non-physician.
HE is the Author of all reality include the alternate ones, afterall.