info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
SAGE models were too 'scary' and held too much weight... says lockdown architect behind them!
8 views
Skip to first unread message
Michael Ejercito
May 11, 2022, 11:48:49 PM5/11/22
to
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10804993/SAGE-models-scary-held-weight-says-lockdown-architect-them.html
SAGE models were too 'scary' and held too much weight... says lockdown
architect behind them! No10 Covid expert admits death forecasts were
'eye watering' and should have considered economy
Professor John Edmunds said Covid models were only supposed to be 'one
component' of decision-making
He accepted models failed to account for the economic and health harms
that Covid lockdowns caused
SAGE member admitted these harms 'in principle' could have been factored
in 'but in practice they were not'
By EMILY CRAIG HEALTH REPORTER FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 11:20 EDT, 11 May 2022 | UPDATED: 12:59 EDT, 11 May 2022
e-mail
575
shares
487
View comments
Professor John Edmunds (pictured), a SAGE modeller, said scientists'
projections of Covid infections, hospitalisations and deaths was only
'one component' of decision-making but were leaned on too much by ministers
+5
View gallery
Professor John Edmunds (pictured), a SAGE modeller, said scientists'
projections of Covid infections, hospitalisations and deaths was only
'one component' of decision-making but were leaned on too much by ministers
Britain relied too much on 'very scary' SAGE models to decide on
lockdowns, according to the man behind some of those very projections.
Just months after SAGE predicted 6,000 deaths per day and called for a
Christmas lockdown in response to Omicron, Professor John Edmunds said
the models were only supposed to be 'one component' of decision-making
but were leaned on too much by ministers.
He accepted the models failed to account for the economic harm and the
knock-on health effects that lockdowns caused.
Professor Edmunds admitted that these harms 'in principle' could have
been factored into models 'but in practice they were not'.
His remarks come as Britons face the harsh reality of two years' of
shutting down the economy and health service, with the NHS grappling a
backlog crisis that has seen one in nine people in England stuck on an
NHS waiting list for treatment and inflation at its highest point in 30
years.
The epidemiologist, who was among the most outspoken members of SAGE,
said some of the death projections in the model were 'truly eye-watering'.
Speaking at a medical conference on Tuesday, he said: 'The
epidemiological model is only one component [of decision-making] and I
wondered and I worried that we’d had too much weight.'
READ MORE
He added: 'There is of course an enormous economic impact from many of
the interventions and other indirect impacts on psychological health and
so on. Now these in principle could be included but in practice they
were not.'
Professor Edmunds called for the first lockdown to be extended in summer
2021, warning Britain was 'taking a risk' by unlocking while still
logging 8,000 cases per day and that the decision was 'clearly' political.
And he warned against easing the third national lockdown in early 2021,
warning it would be a 'disaster' and put 'enormous pressure' on the
health service.
Professor Edmunds' team at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical
Medicine were among four modelling groups that fed into Government
recommendations.
Professor Neil Ferguson - dubbed Professor Lockdown for his gloomy
forecasts - worked within another modelling team at Imperial College
London.
The chair of the SPI-M modelling group has previously admitted the
groups did not consider optimistic scenarios because 'that doesn't get
decisions made'.
SAGE's modelling team at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical
Medicine presented projections on infections (purple), hospitalisations
(red) and deaths (black) under different scenarios between now and
August 2022. The top graph shows hospital admissions from the beginning
from the pandemic. They estimated there could be 10,400 hospitalisations
in England per day at the peak of the outbreak in February in a
worst-case scenario (far right red graph), if Omicron escapes immunity
from vaccines and previous infection and the boosters have a low
efficacy. They assumed that Omicron will continue to grow exponentially
even under Plan B curbs, two jabs offer just 50 per cent protection
against severe disease from the mutant strain and boosters just 80 per cent
+5
View gallery
SAGE's modelling team at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical
Medicine presented projections on infections (purple), hospitalisations
(red) and deaths (black) under different scenarios between now and
August 2022. The top graph shows hospital admissions from the beginning
from the pandemic. They estimated there could be 10,400 hospitalisations
in England per day at the peak of the outbreak in February in a
worst-case scenario (far right red graph), if Omicron escapes immunity
from vaccines and previous infection and the boosters have a low
efficacy. They assumed that Omicron will continue to grow exponentially
even under Plan B curbs, two jabs offer just 50 per cent protection
against severe disease from the mutant strain and boosters just 80 per cent
Imperial College London modelling from March 2020 showed Covid
restrictions individually were insufficient to bring down virus
hospitalisations to a level that hospitals could cope with
+5
View gallery
Imperial College London modelling from March 2020 showed Covid
restrictions individually were insufficient to bring down virus
hospitalisations to a level that hospitals could cope with
Warwick University scientists calculated there would be 6,000 deaths a
day if Plan B alone remains implemented and there is 'extreme pressure'
on the NHS. The graph shows death estimates if Plan B has low
effectiveness (top row of graphs) to high effectiveness (bottom row),
while the columns show death projections based on Omicron's severity
(low to high, left to right)
+5
View gallery
Warwick University scientists calculated there would be 6,000 deaths a
day if Plan B alone remains implemented and there is 'extreme pressure'
on the NHS. The graph shows death estimates if Plan B has low
effectiveness (top row of graphs) to high effectiveness (bottom row),
while the columns show death projections based on Omicron's severity
(low to high, left to right)
RELATED ARTICLES
Previous
1
Next
Children grow faster during the school year: Year 1s gain...
'How on earth would this help?' GPs vote AGAINST surgeries...
Frozen testicular tissue can still make sperm after 2...
Teenager is so allergic to water she can't CRY or SHOWER due...
New treatment offers hope for asbestos cancer patients that...
Why a black filter is safer than a flat white... but only if...
SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Share
575 shares
Most recently, in the winter Omicron surge, the teams warned that daily
hospitalisations could reach 10,000 — more than four times higher than
actual peak of around 2,400. Deaths peaked 20-times lower than the
experts' worst-case scenario.
Ahead of Freedom Day last July, SAGE modelling suggested there could be
another 200,000 UK deaths in the year June 2022 in a worst-case
scenario, which was quickly disputed by other scientists who said it
underestimated the power of the vaccines.
And ahead of the winter 2020 surge, they warned deaths could hit 4,000
per day. A peak of 1,820 was logged.
Speaking at the European Society for Paediatric Infectious Diseases 40th
annual conference, which is taking place in Athens this week, Professor
Edmunds admitted there are weaknesses to scientific models.
WHO chief slams China's for its 'unsustainable' zero Covid policy
The head of the World Health Organization has finally criticised China's
Zero Covid strategy and urged it to change its policy, as millions in
Shanghai enter their seventh and most brutal week of lockdown yet.
In a rare rebuke of the Communist party, which is one of the biggest
financial contributors to the health agency, WHO director-general Tedros
Adhanom Ghebreyesus said the strategy was unsustainable.
'As we all know, the virus is evolving, changing its behaviours,
becoming more transmissible,' he said. 'With that changing behaviour,
changing your measures will be very important.
'When we talk about the zero-Covid strategy, we don't think it's
sustainable.' He added: 'Considering the behaviour of the virus I think
a shift [in China's strategy] will be very important.'
The WHO had previously been slammed as too 'China-centric' during the
pandemic and was accused of failing to publicly challenge Chinese
misinformation in early 2020.
Chinese censors have already censored Dr Tedros' comments, with searches
for the hashtags 'Tedros' and 'WHO' on the popular Weibo social media
platform displaying no results.
Users of the WeChat app have also been unable to share articles posted
on an official United Nations health agency's account.
Official Chinese modelling used to justify sticking to Zero Covid has
warned that ditching it now would unleash a 'tsunami' of infections and
kill 1.6million people this summer.
He said: 'One of the issues is that it’s only one component in
decision-making. So the epidemiological model is only one component and
I wondered and I worried that we’d had too much weight.'
There was an 'enormous economic impact' as well as harm to mental health
from lockdowns, which saw people unable to mix outside their household,
schools close and mandatory working from home.
He said they were left out because the link between Covid cases and
damage to the economy was 'really unclear'.
And the social and psychological impact of the restrictions are 'still
not clear' and were 'certainly not clear ahead of time', Professor
Edmunds said.
He added: 'So these things were not included. And I actually think in
many respects it was a great failure of health economics to not really
contribute to this field during the epidemic.'
Yet dozens of scientists warned throughout the pandemic about the toll
of lockdowns and restrictions on mental and physical health, as well as
the economy.
Professor Edmunds noted that Covid models fail to include factors that
are 'unknowable at the time' such as the severity of Omicron when it
emerged.
During the winter Omicron wave, SAGE models did not take account of the
variant's reduced severity, despite real-world data from South Africa
showing the strain caused milder illness.
He also noted that it is not possible to accurately predict how the
public will act in an outbreak.
Professor Edmunds has previously hit out at the Government for not going
into lockdowns earlier and easing restrictions too quickly, including
the scrapping of mandatory self-isolation.
He was one of the leading scientific voices when the first lockdown was
imposed in early 2020.
Detailing the response to the first wave, Professor Edmunds said: 'We
looked at different interventions and came out with truly eye watering,
very scary results, in terms of deaths, perhaps 300 to 4,000 [daily]
deaths in the UK alone if we just let the epidemic run its course.
'That’s of course without changing behaviour.
'Probably, the individual would have changed their behaviour anyway. But
huge numbers of deaths, huge numbers of intensive care beds usage.'
But Professor Edmunds said there are questions around how much modelling
helped in the UK's initial response, as the UK brought in the
stay-at-home order later than other nations.
He said: 'It certainly didn’t help us move very fast here and, in fact,
I wonder whether because we had these tools and policymakers could ask
us questions — "what about if we did this and what about if we did that"
— that that might have actually contributed to us actually making a
decision quite slowly.
'And in fact the speed of that lockdown was certainly the biggest
contributing factor to total numbers of deaths in the first wave.'
SAGE scientists have previously claimed their official projections have
not come to fruition due to behavioural changes among the population,
who cut their contacts when cases are on the rise, as well as high
levels of immunity following multiple waves.
The models have come under fire from other experts, who have criticised
SAGE for failing to talk to sociologist and economists when doing their
modelling, meaning they failed to incorporate 'things other people know
about'.
Professor Graham Medley, who chairs Spi-M, a modelling group that feeds
into SAGE, admitted modelling has failed to reflect the reality of how
waves unfold because they do not factor in behaviour changes, one of the
Government's chief pandemic advisers has admitted.
'The epidemic is dynamic,' he said. 'People's responses to the situation
in March 2020 were very different to those in November 2020 and very
different again in January 2021.'
Professor Medley, based at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical
Medicine, added: 'The modelling is there to understand the process and
what's going on. We know we cannot accurately predict the numbers but we
can give insight into the processes that determine the outcomes.'
Professor Edmunds echoed his comments at the conference yesterday,
noting it is 'not currently possible' to accurately take people's
behaviours into account in scientific models.
ADVERTISEMENT
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
SAGE models were too 'scary' and held too much weight... says lockdown
architect behind them! No10 Covid expert admits death forecasts were
'eye watering' and should have considered economy
Professor John Edmunds said Covid models were only supposed to be 'one
component' of decision-making
He accepted models failed to account for the economic and health harms
that Covid lockdowns caused
SAGE member admitted these harms 'in principle' could have been factored
in 'but in practice they were not'
By EMILY CRAIG HEALTH REPORTER FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 11:20 EDT, 11 May 2022 | UPDATED: 12:59 EDT, 11 May 2022
575
shares
487
View comments
Professor John Edmunds (pictured), a SAGE modeller, said scientists'
projections of Covid infections, hospitalisations and deaths was only
'one component' of decision-making but were leaned on too much by ministers
+5
View gallery
Professor John Edmunds (pictured), a SAGE modeller, said scientists'
projections of Covid infections, hospitalisations and deaths was only
'one component' of decision-making but were leaned on too much by ministers
Britain relied too much on 'very scary' SAGE models to decide on
lockdowns, according to the man behind some of those very projections.
Just months after SAGE predicted 6,000 deaths per day and called for a
Christmas lockdown in response to Omicron, Professor John Edmunds said
the models were only supposed to be 'one component' of decision-making
but were leaned on too much by ministers.
He accepted the models failed to account for the economic harm and the
knock-on health effects that lockdowns caused.
Professor Edmunds admitted that these harms 'in principle' could have
been factored into models 'but in practice they were not'.
His remarks come as Britons face the harsh reality of two years' of
shutting down the economy and health service, with the NHS grappling a
backlog crisis that has seen one in nine people in England stuck on an
NHS waiting list for treatment and inflation at its highest point in 30
years.
The epidemiologist, who was among the most outspoken members of SAGE,
said some of the death projections in the model were 'truly eye-watering'.
Speaking at a medical conference on Tuesday, he said: 'The
epidemiological model is only one component [of decision-making] and I
wondered and I worried that we’d had too much weight.'
READ MORE
He added: 'There is of course an enormous economic impact from many of
the interventions and other indirect impacts on psychological health and
so on. Now these in principle could be included but in practice they
were not.'
Professor Edmunds called for the first lockdown to be extended in summer
2021, warning Britain was 'taking a risk' by unlocking while still
logging 8,000 cases per day and that the decision was 'clearly' political.
And he warned against easing the third national lockdown in early 2021,
warning it would be a 'disaster' and put 'enormous pressure' on the
health service.
Professor Edmunds' team at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical
Medicine were among four modelling groups that fed into Government
recommendations.
Professor Neil Ferguson - dubbed Professor Lockdown for his gloomy
forecasts - worked within another modelling team at Imperial College
London.
The chair of the SPI-M modelling group has previously admitted the
groups did not consider optimistic scenarios because 'that doesn't get
decisions made'.
SAGE's modelling team at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical
Medicine presented projections on infections (purple), hospitalisations
(red) and deaths (black) under different scenarios between now and
August 2022. The top graph shows hospital admissions from the beginning
from the pandemic. They estimated there could be 10,400 hospitalisations
in England per day at the peak of the outbreak in February in a
worst-case scenario (far right red graph), if Omicron escapes immunity
from vaccines and previous infection and the boosters have a low
efficacy. They assumed that Omicron will continue to grow exponentially
even under Plan B curbs, two jabs offer just 50 per cent protection
against severe disease from the mutant strain and boosters just 80 per cent
+5
View gallery
SAGE's modelling team at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical
Medicine presented projections on infections (purple), hospitalisations
(red) and deaths (black) under different scenarios between now and
August 2022. The top graph shows hospital admissions from the beginning
from the pandemic. They estimated there could be 10,400 hospitalisations
in England per day at the peak of the outbreak in February in a
worst-case scenario (far right red graph), if Omicron escapes immunity
from vaccines and previous infection and the boosters have a low
efficacy. They assumed that Omicron will continue to grow exponentially
even under Plan B curbs, two jabs offer just 50 per cent protection
against severe disease from the mutant strain and boosters just 80 per cent
Imperial College London modelling from March 2020 showed Covid
restrictions individually were insufficient to bring down virus
hospitalisations to a level that hospitals could cope with
+5
View gallery
Imperial College London modelling from March 2020 showed Covid
restrictions individually were insufficient to bring down virus
hospitalisations to a level that hospitals could cope with
Warwick University scientists calculated there would be 6,000 deaths a
day if Plan B alone remains implemented and there is 'extreme pressure'
on the NHS. The graph shows death estimates if Plan B has low
effectiveness (top row of graphs) to high effectiveness (bottom row),
while the columns show death projections based on Omicron's severity
(low to high, left to right)
+5
View gallery
Warwick University scientists calculated there would be 6,000 deaths a
day if Plan B alone remains implemented and there is 'extreme pressure'
on the NHS. The graph shows death estimates if Plan B has low
effectiveness (top row of graphs) to high effectiveness (bottom row),
while the columns show death projections based on Omicron's severity
(low to high, left to right)
RELATED ARTICLES
Previous
1
Next
Children grow faster during the school year: Year 1s gain...
'How on earth would this help?' GPs vote AGAINST surgeries...
Frozen testicular tissue can still make sperm after 2...
Teenager is so allergic to water she can't CRY or SHOWER due...
New treatment offers hope for asbestos cancer patients that...
Why a black filter is safer than a flat white... but only if...
SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Share
575 shares
Most recently, in the winter Omicron surge, the teams warned that daily
hospitalisations could reach 10,000 — more than four times higher than
actual peak of around 2,400. Deaths peaked 20-times lower than the
experts' worst-case scenario.
Ahead of Freedom Day last July, SAGE modelling suggested there could be
another 200,000 UK deaths in the year June 2022 in a worst-case
scenario, which was quickly disputed by other scientists who said it
underestimated the power of the vaccines.
And ahead of the winter 2020 surge, they warned deaths could hit 4,000
per day. A peak of 1,820 was logged.
Speaking at the European Society for Paediatric Infectious Diseases 40th
annual conference, which is taking place in Athens this week, Professor
Edmunds admitted there are weaknesses to scientific models.
WHO chief slams China's for its 'unsustainable' zero Covid policy
The head of the World Health Organization has finally criticised China's
Zero Covid strategy and urged it to change its policy, as millions in
Shanghai enter their seventh and most brutal week of lockdown yet.
In a rare rebuke of the Communist party, which is one of the biggest
financial contributors to the health agency, WHO director-general Tedros
Adhanom Ghebreyesus said the strategy was unsustainable.
'As we all know, the virus is evolving, changing its behaviours,
becoming more transmissible,' he said. 'With that changing behaviour,
changing your measures will be very important.
'When we talk about the zero-Covid strategy, we don't think it's
sustainable.' He added: 'Considering the behaviour of the virus I think
a shift [in China's strategy] will be very important.'
The WHO had previously been slammed as too 'China-centric' during the
pandemic and was accused of failing to publicly challenge Chinese
misinformation in early 2020.
Chinese censors have already censored Dr Tedros' comments, with searches
for the hashtags 'Tedros' and 'WHO' on the popular Weibo social media
platform displaying no results.
Users of the WeChat app have also been unable to share articles posted
on an official United Nations health agency's account.
Official Chinese modelling used to justify sticking to Zero Covid has
warned that ditching it now would unleash a 'tsunami' of infections and
kill 1.6million people this summer.
He said: 'One of the issues is that it’s only one component in
decision-making. So the epidemiological model is only one component and
I wondered and I worried that we’d had too much weight.'
There was an 'enormous economic impact' as well as harm to mental health
from lockdowns, which saw people unable to mix outside their household,
schools close and mandatory working from home.
He said they were left out because the link between Covid cases and
damage to the economy was 'really unclear'.
And the social and psychological impact of the restrictions are 'still
not clear' and were 'certainly not clear ahead of time', Professor
Edmunds said.
He added: 'So these things were not included. And I actually think in
many respects it was a great failure of health economics to not really
contribute to this field during the epidemic.'
Yet dozens of scientists warned throughout the pandemic about the toll
of lockdowns and restrictions on mental and physical health, as well as
the economy.
Professor Edmunds noted that Covid models fail to include factors that
are 'unknowable at the time' such as the severity of Omicron when it
emerged.
During the winter Omicron wave, SAGE models did not take account of the
variant's reduced severity, despite real-world data from South Africa
showing the strain caused milder illness.
He also noted that it is not possible to accurately predict how the
public will act in an outbreak.
Professor Edmunds has previously hit out at the Government for not going
into lockdowns earlier and easing restrictions too quickly, including
the scrapping of mandatory self-isolation.
He was one of the leading scientific voices when the first lockdown was
imposed in early 2020.
Detailing the response to the first wave, Professor Edmunds said: 'We
looked at different interventions and came out with truly eye watering,
very scary results, in terms of deaths, perhaps 300 to 4,000 [daily]
deaths in the UK alone if we just let the epidemic run its course.
'That’s of course without changing behaviour.
'Probably, the individual would have changed their behaviour anyway. But
huge numbers of deaths, huge numbers of intensive care beds usage.'
But Professor Edmunds said there are questions around how much modelling
helped in the UK's initial response, as the UK brought in the
stay-at-home order later than other nations.
He said: 'It certainly didn’t help us move very fast here and, in fact,
I wonder whether because we had these tools and policymakers could ask
us questions — "what about if we did this and what about if we did that"
— that that might have actually contributed to us actually making a
decision quite slowly.
'And in fact the speed of that lockdown was certainly the biggest
contributing factor to total numbers of deaths in the first wave.'
SAGE scientists have previously claimed their official projections have
not come to fruition due to behavioural changes among the population,
who cut their contacts when cases are on the rise, as well as high
levels of immunity following multiple waves.
The models have come under fire from other experts, who have criticised
SAGE for failing to talk to sociologist and economists when doing their
modelling, meaning they failed to incorporate 'things other people know
about'.
Professor Graham Medley, who chairs Spi-M, a modelling group that feeds
into SAGE, admitted modelling has failed to reflect the reality of how
waves unfold because they do not factor in behaviour changes, one of the
Government's chief pandemic advisers has admitted.
'The epidemic is dynamic,' he said. 'People's responses to the situation
in March 2020 were very different to those in November 2020 and very
different again in January 2021.'
Professor Medley, based at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical
Medicine, added: 'The modelling is there to understand the process and
what's going on. We know we cannot accurately predict the numbers but we
can give insight into the processes that determine the outcomes.'
Professor Edmunds echoed his comments at the conference yesterday,
noting it is 'not currently possible' to accurately take people's
behaviours into account in scientific models.
ADVERTISEMENT
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
HeartDoc Andrew
May 11, 2022, 11:55:26 PM5/11/22
to
the U.K. & elsewhere is by rapidly ( http://bit.ly/RapidTestCOVID-19 )
finding out at any given moment, including even while on-line, who
among us are unwittingly contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or
asymptomatic) in order to http://tinyurl.com/ConvinceItForward (John
15:12) for them to call their doctor and self-quarantine per their
doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic. Thus, we're hoping for the
best while preparing for the worse-case scenario of the Alpha lineage
mutations and others like the Omicron, Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota,
Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations combining via
slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like
http://tinyurl.com/Deltamicron that may render current COVID
vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no longer effective.
Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry ( http://tinyurl.com/RapidOmicronTest
) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
So how are you ?
...because we mindfully choose to openly care with our heart,
HeartDoc Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist with an http://bit.ly/EternalMedicalLicense
2024 & upwards non-partisan candidate for U.S. President:
http://WonderfullyHungry.org
and author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrewCare
which is the only **healthy** cure for the U.S. healthcare crisis
Michael Ejercito
May 12, 2022, 12:07:48 AM5/12/22
to
Michael
HeartDoc Andrew
May 12, 2022, 12:12:34 AM5/12/22
to
Michael Ejercito wrote:
While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as circling eagles don't have COVID) and
pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6) Father in
Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy Spirit
(Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to always
say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways including
especially caring to http://tinyurl.com/ConvinceItForward (John 15:12
as shown by http://bit.ly/RapidTestCOVID-19 ) with all glory (
http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.
Laus DEO !
Suggested further reading:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/5EWtT4CwCOg/m/QjNF57xRBAAJ
Shorter link:
http://bit.ly/StatCOVID-19Test
Be hungrier, which really is wonderfully healthier especially for
diabetics and other heart disease patients:
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://tinyurl.com/HeartVAT from around the heart
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as circling eagles don't have COVID) and
pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6) Father in
Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy Spirit
(Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to always
say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways including
especially caring to http://tinyurl.com/ConvinceItForward (John 15:12
as shown by http://bit.ly/RapidTestCOVID-19 ) with all glory (
http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.
Laus DEO !
Suggested further reading:
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/5EWtT4CwCOg/m/QjNF57xRBAAJ
Shorter link:
http://bit.ly/StatCOVID-19Test
Be hungrier, which really is wonderfully healthier especially for
diabetics and other heart disease patients:
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://tinyurl.com/HeartVAT from around the heart
0 new messages