Daily WDJW Health Tip for 03/04/15

[Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD]

It's when we're humble (2 Samuel 22:28) that we become healthier (
http://WDJW.net/WonderfullyHungrier ) than ever:

http://WDJW.net/HealthTip

Don't be an Ayoob or you will most certainly die a horrible (Mark
9:42) death:

https://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/9c87c24ea7a7ee20?

Be hungrier, which really is wonderfully healthier especially for
diabetics and other heart disease patients:

http://bit.ly/HeartDoc777-touts-hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory to
GOD, Who causes us to hunger (Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us
right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby removing the http://WDJW.net/VAT from
around the heart

...because we mindfully choose to openly care with our heart,

HeartDoc Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Emory's IMVC.org cardiologist (GA Lic#040347)
and author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://WDJW.net/Luke2442
which is the only **healthy** way to cure cardiovascular disease

[Mr. Ed]

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

> On Tuesday, June 25, 2013, Andrew in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Emory's IMVC.org cardiologist (GA Lic#040347)

i have a question for you;

does the "Holy Spirit" require your "credentials" as support,

is this; [MD/PhD Emory's IMVC.org cardiologist (GA Lic#040347)]

supposed to give your statements a more powerful support?

just wondering

[Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD]

a http://bit.ly/DyingDiabetic wrote:

>i have a question for you;
>
>does the "Holy Spirit" require your "credentials" as support,
>
>is this; [MD/PhD Emory's IMVC.org cardiologist (GA Lic#040347)]
>
>supposed to give your statements a more powerful support?

Just as Ananias and Sapphira dying horrible deaths at the feet of
disciple Peter, in the Holy Spirit, gave Peter's statements more
powerful support, Bob Pastorio dying a horrible death at the feet of
http://WDJW.net/HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, gives this
physician's statements more powerful support:

http://WDJW.net/HolySpirit

[Mr. Ed]

Mr Ed wrote:

> >i have a question for you;
> >does the "Holy Spirit" require your "credentials" as support,
> >is this; [MD/PhD Emory's IMVC.org cardiologist (GA Lic#040347)]
> >supposed to give your statements a more powerful support?

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

> Just as Ananias and Sapphira dying horrible deaths at the feet of
> disciple Peter, in the Holy Spirit, gave Peter's statements more
> powerful support, Bob Pastorio dying a horrible death at the feet of

> http://WDJW.net/HeatDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, gives this

> physician's statements more powerful support:

no no no no no, the question is;

does the Holy Spirit require YOUR humanly devised "credentials"

i.e. [MD/PhD Emory's IMVC.org cardiologist (GA Lic#040347)] <===

as support for the Holy Spirit's own "bold" work?

[Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD]

a bit.ly/DyingDiabetic wrote:

>> a bit.ly/DyingDiabetic wrote:
>>
>> > i have a question for you;
>> > does the "Holy Spirit" require your "credentials" as support,

>> > ** is this; [MD/PhD Emory's IMVC.org cardiologist (GA Lic#040347)]
>> > supposed to give your statements a more powerful support? **

**emphasis** added

> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
>> Just as Ananias and Sapphira dying horrible deaths at the feet of
>> disciple Peter, in the Holy Spirit, gave Peter's statements more
>> powerful support, Bob Pastorio dying a horrible death at the feet of
>> http://WDJW.net/HeatDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, gives this
>> physician's statements more powerful support:
>>

>> http://WDJW.net/HolySpirit

>
>no no no no no, the question is;
>
>does the Holy Spirit require YOUR humanly devised "credentials"
>
>i.e. [MD/PhD Emory's IMVC.org cardiologist (GA Lic#040347)] <===
>
>as support for the Holy Spirit's own "bold" work?

Your question (see **emphasis** above) has already been answered
correctly.

Your now stating that the Holy Spirit, Who is GOD, has
requirements/needs is blaspheming against Him.

This is why you are now eternally condemned to die an eternally
terrible death.

[Mr. Ed]

> Mr. Ed wrote:

> >> > i have a question for you;
> >> > does the "Holy Spirit" require your "credentials" as support,
> >> > ** is this; [MD/PhD Emory's IMVC.org cardiologist (GA Lic#040347)]
> >> > supposed to give your statements a more powerful support? **

> **emphasis** added

ok

> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

> >> Just as Ananias and Sapphira dying horrible deaths at the feet of
> >> disciple Peter, in the Holy Spirit, gave Peter's statements more
> >> powerful support, Bob Pastorio dying a horrible death at the feet of

> >> http://WDJW.net/HeatD Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, gives this

> >> physician's statements more powerful support:

Mr. Ed wrote:

> >no no no no no, the question is;
> >does the Holy Spirit require YOUR humanly devised "credentials"
> >i.e. [MD/PhD Emory's IMVC.org cardiologist (GA Lic#040347)] <===
> >as support for the Holy Spirit's own "bold" work?

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

> Your question (see **emphasis** above) has already been answered
> correctly.

you have yet to answer my question 'correctly' nor any other way.

but, you're getting there.


you claim to be speaking "boldly in the Holy Spirit"

and you also carry around these humanly devised "credentials"

you now say that the Holy Spirit does not require your
humanly devised credentials nor anything else as support.

so, why do you carry the humanly devised credentials with you?

clearly, it provides no support for teh "Holy Spirit's bold work"

so, it must be providing support for _you_ and _you_ alone.

if the Holy Spirit were boldly working to support this "thesis"
you present, the Holy Spirit, according to you, would require
no such humanly devised credential, nor anything else, to support
the Holy Spirit's bold work, so, the only answer is, that
_you_ present your credentials to support _your_ own thesis.

> Your now stating that the Holy Spirit, Who is GOD, has
> requirements/needs is blaspheming against Him.

no, I simply asked what purpose you have in presenting
these humanly devised credentials as support for a
"bold work of the Holy Spirit"

as you suggest, the Holy Spirit has no needs of
your humanly devised credentials as support,

so, your presenting of your humanly devised credentials is
_you_ attempting to lend support for a work you also would
claim, needs no such support.

otherwise, you say that your statements are your own,
and _not_ the "bold work" of the Holy Spirit.


Holy Spirit work needs no support [your statement]

Andrew Chung's work needs support? [you offer your humanly devised credentials as such]

> This is why you are now eternally condemned to die an eternally
> terrible death.

thanks much, i appreciate this

i wasn't condemning you, i was asking you a simple question.


have a nice day and enjoy your 24 oz meal of bear claws.


[guidelines]

[Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD]

an eternally condemned bit.ly/DyingDiabetic wrote:

>> an eternally condemned bit.ly/DyingDiabetic wrote:
>
>> >> > i have a question for you;
>> >> > does the "Holy Spirit" require your "credentials" as support,
>> >> > ** is this; [MD/PhD Emory's IMVC.org cardiologist (GA Lic#040347)]
>> >> > supposed to give your statements a more powerful support? **
>
>> **emphasis** added
>
> ok

ok is an acronym for "Oll Korrect" which is a facetious rendering of
"All Correct."

It's use here is lying before the Holy Spirit just as Ananias and
Sapphira lied before the Holy Spirit.

>> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
>> >> Just as Ananias and Sapphira dying horrible deaths at the feet of
>> >> disciple Peter, in the Holy Spirit, gave Peter's statements more
>> >> powerful support, Bob Pastorio dying a horrible death at the feet of

>> >> http://WDJW.net/HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, gives this

>> >> physician's statements more powerful support:
>> >>

>> >> http://WDJW.net/HolySpirit

>
> an eternally condemned bit.ly/DyingDiabetic wrote:
>
>> >no no no no no, the question is;
>> >does the Holy Spirit require YOUR humanly devised "credentials"
>> >i.e. [MD/PhD Emory's IMVC.org cardiologist (GA Lic#040347)] <===
>> >as support for the Holy Spirit's own "bold" work?
>

> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
>> Your question (see **emphasis** above) has already been answered
>> correctly.

Source:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/3GowNSwPwWI/EvCQsKSLXkcJ

> you have yet to answer my question 'correctly' nor any other way.

You are clearly not among the discerning but rather are among the
eternally condemned who will never be http://WDJW.net/Forgiven by the
LORD our infinite Creator GOD.

It is written that a lake of eternal fire is being prepared for you
and all the others whose names are not in Jesus' Book of Life.

[Mr. Ed]

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

> an eternally condemned bit.ly/DyingDiabetic wrote:

apparently Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD has "discerned" that
Mr. Ed is diabetic and nonesuch thing is true, as Mr. Ed
is -not- diabetic nor dying, which brings Andrew's
"discernment" in to question.

obviously, Andrew's "discernment" is not a product
of the "Holy Spirit" but, instead, the product of
Andrew's own personal fleshly mind.


this is devolving in to histrionics

[Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD]

an eternally condemned bit.ly/DyingDiabetic wrote:
>> an eternally condemned bit.ly/DyingDiabetic wrote:
>

>> >> > i have a question for you;
>> >> > does the "Holy Spirit" require your "credentials" as support,
>> >> > ** is this; [MD/PhD Emory's IMVC.org cardiologist (GA Lic#040347)]
>> >> > supposed to give your statements a more powerful support? **
>
>> **emphasis** added
>
> ok

ok is an acronym for "Oll Korrect" which is a facetious rendering of
"All Correct."

It's use here is lying before the Holy Spirit just as Ananias and
Sapphira lied before the Holy Spirit.

>> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
>> >> Just as Ananias and Sapphira dying horrible deaths at the feet of
>> >> disciple Peter, in the Holy Spirit, gave Peter's statements more
>> >> powerful support, Bob Pastorio dying a horrible death at the feet of
>> >> http://WDJW.net/HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, gives this
>> >> physician's statements more powerful support:
>> >>
>> >> http://WDJW.net/HolySpirit
>

> an eternally condemned bit.ly/DyingDiabetic wrote:
>

[Mr. Ed]

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD derived from his flesh mind:

> an eternally condemned bit.ly/DyingDiabetic wrote:

Motorhead Ace of Spades

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvK7PCO6T0M


fin

[Maya Zuiderweg]

Op 4-3-2015, heeft Mr. Ed verondersteld :

Err..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGdxxMECZz4

[Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD]

Maya wrote:

> an eternally condemned http://bit.ly/DyingDiabetic wrote:
>>
>> Motorhead Ace of Spades
>

> Err..

Indeed, only the spirit of error in that one.

an eternally condemned http://bit.ly/DyingDiabetic wrote:

>> an eternally condemned http://bit.ly/DyingDiabetic wrote:
>
>> >> > i have a question for you;
>> >> > does the "Holy Spirit" require your "credentials" as support,
>> >> > ** is this; [MD/PhD Emory's IMVC.org cardiologist (GA Lic#040347)]
>> >> > supposed to give your statements a more powerful support? **
>
>> **emphasis** added
>
> ok

ok is an acronym for "Oll Korrect" which is a facetious rendering of
"All Correct."

It's use here is lying before the Holy Spirit just as Ananias and
Sapphira lied before the Holy Spirit.

>> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
>> >> Just as Ananias and Sapphira dying horrible deaths at the feet of
>> >> disciple Peter, in the Holy Spirit, gave Peter's statements more
>> >> powerful support, Bob Pastorio dying a horrible death at the feet of
>> >> http://WDJW.net/HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, gives this
>> >> physician's statements more powerful support:
>> >>
>> >> http://WDJW.net/HolySpirit
>

> an eternally condemned bit.ly/DyingDiabetic wrote:
>

[Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD]

It's when we've repented (2 Chronicles 7:14) that we become healthier

[Timothy Sutter]

any "benefit of the doubt" credibility i may have affforded this chung
kid
simply by virtue of my "benefit of the doubt" attitude, completely
vanished
by virtue of this chung kid's response in this thread.

[shaking my head]

but, thanks for the mister ed clip, it was humorous...

which i cannot say for this chung kid/

[Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD]

Timothy Sutter wrote:

> any "benefit of the doubt" ...

Actually, doubt has no benefit.

http://WDJW.net/HeartDoc Andrew greets you, Timothy, following the way
here in Georgia, USA:

How are you ?

[Timothy Sutter]

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

> Timothy Sutter wrote:

> > any "benefit of the doubt" ...

> Actually, doubt has no benefit.

the benefit is a favorable attitude given
until such time as 'doubtful' uncertainty
is removed.

==
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/benefit+of+the+doubt
"benefit of the doubt"
1. a favorable opinion or judgment adopted despite uncertainty.
==

> Andrew greets you, Timothy, following the way here in Georgia, USA:

> How are you ?

i'm well, and you?

[Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD]

Timothy Sutter wrote:

> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> Timothy Sutter wrote:
>
>> > any "benefit of the doubt" ...
>
>> Actually, doubt has no benefit.
>
>the benefit is a favorable attitude given
>until such time as 'doubtful' uncertainty
>is removed.
>
>==
>http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/benefit+of+the+doubt
>"benefit of the doubt"
>1. a favorable opinion or judgment adopted despite uncertainty.
>==

As it is written, without faith (i.e. with doubt), there is no
pleasing the LORD our infinite Creator GOD to have His favor. Thus,
doubt has no benefit because the favorable opinion of others is in
vain as is everything else without the favor of the LORD.

>> Andrew greets you, Timothy, following the way here in Georgia, USA:
>
>> How are you ?
>
> i'm well, and you?

I am http://bit.ly/WonderfullyHungry :-) and hope your "well" means
you, Timothy, also have a healthy appetite too :-) So are you able to
eat real food right now (yes/no) ?

[Timothy Sutter]

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

> Timothy Sutter wrote:

> > Andrew wrote:

> >> Timothy Sutter wrote:

> >> > any "benefit of the doubt" ...

> >> Actually, doubt has no benefit.

> >the benefit is a favorable attitude given
> >until such time as 'doubtful' uncertainty
> >is removed.

> >==
> >http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/benefit+of+the+doubt
> >"benefit of the doubt"
> >1. a favorable opinion or judgment adopted despite uncertainty.
> >==

> As it is written, without faith (i.e. with doubt), there is no
> pleasing the LORD our infinite Creator GOD to have His favor. Thus,
> doubt has no benefit because the favorable opinion of others is in
> vain as is everything else without the favor of the LORD.

and the "benefit of a doubt" -is- _precisely_ such a 'faithful' attitude
towards people who -haven't- managed to remove all doubt by opening
their mouths
and condemning people to eternal torments for asking a simple question.

a question which undoubtedly -could- have been answered better than;

<paraphrasing>

"you are condemned to eternal torments for asking such questions"

</paraphrase>

an exact quote won't be much more useful...

> >> Andrew greets you, Timothy, following the way here in Georgia, USA:

> >> How are you ?

> > i'm well, and you?

> I am WonderfullyHungry :-) and hope your "well" means

> you, Timothy, also have a healthy appetite too :-)
> So are you able to eat real food right now (yes/no) ?

teh "Mr. Ed diet" is not guided -purely- by the
-weight- of foodstuffs placed in one's stomach...

the type and content of such foodstuffs is on -some- interest...


-but- this may be of interest to you;


==
John 4:31-34

In the meantime His disciples urged Him, saying, "Rabbi, eat."

But He said to them;

"I have food to eat of which you do not know."

Therefore the disciples said to one another,
"Has anyone brought Him anything to eat?"

Jesus said to them, "My food is to do the will
of Him who sent Me, and to finish His work."
==

when you start saying things like;

"This gentile Christian disciple enjoyed
a wide array of the tasty will of God"


i may overlook being condemed to eternal torment
for asking a simple question of [him]


yes, i eat solid food...

no, i am not diabetic...

to subsist on teh "will of God" is an awesome 'goal'

[Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD]

Timothy Sutter wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> Timothy Sutter wrote:

To paraphrase something that is written here in this Usenet thread is
to lie.

"Those who doubt have no faith." -- Holy Spirit (Matthew 21:21)

http://WDJW.net/HolySpirit

Bottom line:

Doubt has no benefit.

>> >> http://WDJW.net/HeartDoc Andrew greets you, Timothy, following the way here in Georgia, USA:

>
>> >> How are you ?
>
>> > i'm well, and you?
>

>> I am http://bit.ly/WonderfullyHungry :-) and hope your "well" means

>> you, Timothy, also have a healthy appetite too :-)
>> So are you able to eat real food right now (yes/no) ?
>

> teh ...

http://HeartDoc Andrew sadly notes that you, Timothy, are
http://bit.ly/TerriblyHungry as evident by your not being able to
respond affirmatively to the above simple yes/no question.

[Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD]

It's when we've been saved from a death trap (Proverbs 14:27) that we

[Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD]

It's when we're being taught (Psalm 25:9) by the LORD our infinite
Creator GOD that we become healthier (

[Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD]

It's when we're being heard (Daniel 10:12) by the LORD our infinite

which is the absolutely only **healthy** cure for acquired disease

[Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD]

It's when we're being strengthened (Ephesians 3:16) by the LORD our