On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 1:47:57 PM UTC-5, alouatta....@gmail.com wrote: > On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 11:10:43 AM UTC-7, Archimedes

On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 3:02:01 PM UTC-5, alouatta....@gmail.com wrote: > > no, it isn't. easy to spot insane persons in sci.math--

Michael Moroney writes: 1:30 PM (32 minutes ago) Univ of Western Ontario, a failed university with teachers like Dan Christensen attack dogs in sci.

On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 12:55:34 PM UTC-5, alouatta....@gmail.com wrote: > On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 at 10:42:34 AM UTC-7, Archimedes

L. Renfro" wrote: >quasi wrote: > >>> If an uncountable set has cardinality less than that of R >>> and is measurable. must it have measure 0? > >

C. Ullrich pointed out, I think you're going to encounter a lot of difficulty in trying to _prove_ the limit is infinity at the beginning of a calculus course, at least by using a proof

C. Ullrich, Robin Chapman, and Peter L. Montgomery) were able to help me with: sci.math thread: Help with 1/2 - (1/8)*x < 1/x - 1/(e^x - 1) 18-22 March 2001 http://tinyurl.com/2b3x7qt

why isnt sqrt(x^2 + y^2) a polynomial? Thanks in advance! Mike

This question was motivated by a the following problem: Let S be a subset of R^n such that every

L. Renfro" wrote: >> Here's an interesting problem I recently saw. >> >> Take the usual middle thirds Cantor set, constructed on the >> closed

C. Ullrich wrote: >> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 02:15:23 -0500, David Bernier >> wrote: >> >>> Zygmunt Zahorski did a lot of work in real analysis on properties

L. Renfro" wrote: >OK, this may be a well-known folklore math quote, >but a google-web search gives only 2 hits (both being >the same book) and a google-book search gives

Dave L Renfro wrote : >> > >> >> The purpose of this post is to archive an old >> >> handout >> >> of mine on the Cauchy condensation test

There is a neat folklore definite integral whose value is 22/7 - pi: The integral from x = 0 to x = 1

L. Renfro" wrote: >Recently, I've begun working with someone who wants >to work his way through Henle's book: > >James M. Henle, "An Outline of Set

L. Renfro" wrote: >David C. Ullrich wrote (in part): > >> Forget the irrationals. The fact that an open interval (0,1) >> has outer measure 1 really isn'

I've had huge success with killfiling the whole of googlegroups, (minus about 5 individuals who

L. Renfro wrote: >> sto wrote (in part): >> >>> It is my understanding that this definition can be generalized >>> to an extended real valued function

Sentences between (parentheses) are often the most interesting in the book "Complex Made Simple

since only set theory can hold the attention of the majority at sci.math ill post about it again ,

IF I ask you to pick an integer at random, the probability that I can guess your selection is zero.

I know how to prove that for natural numbers r and n, with r=<n, we have that the cardinality of

Conjecture. A complex valued function of two real variables in general is not the same as a "

Now that we are nearing the end of the decade, allow me to suggest that we take a poll. :-) In

L. Renfro" wrote: >Finally, as for how long the lines are, I seem to remember >reading a long time ago that you should never go over >71 (or maybe 72, I don't remember

L. Renfro wrote (in part): >> >> > Does there exist an uncountable set that >> simultaneously >> > satisfies all these notions of "measure zero

talking about ullrich or feldmann here specificly. where is the math of eg neilist ?? pianoman ?? dedanoe ?? katbo ?? antonio ?? waste of time ?? bit188 ?? thread started in jan !! were

that David Ullrich brings up seem very different to me, but the type of comment I quoted leads me to wonder if these authors are even aware of the possibilities. [They probably are, and

C. Ullrich wrote (in part): > Which argument are you referring to, and why do you assume > it's the argument Edgar had in mind? There are two arguments > sketched in that

convergence on the boundary of the radius of convergence of a taylor series. given a taylor series