Failures of math, please do not talk to them-- Christensen, Burse, Gabriel,

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Dan Christensen, Jan Burse and various alias, John Gabriel, are the three worst failures of math at this moment.

Two of the three are just dirty stalkers, and math is besides the point, they need to stalk, as nourishment for daily sustenance.

The third, Gabriel is a loud mouth obnoxious twit who bad mouthes everyone around. I think the failure of Gabriel is likely linked to his wanting his crap published and the publisher denying, so here he is filling up sci.math everyday with his mind rot. So retched bad is his New Calculus, that the moron does not know he needs to work with an infinitesimal, he needs to find the infinity borderline to obtain a infinitesimal 1*10^-604. The fool thinks the derivative is a parallel line with the Mean Value theorem, and has not one single change in the integral. The fool steals from me, but hates to have to reference me. Math is too much for Gabriel, and should be in service industry, not academics.

Christensen and Burse are obnoxious stalkers. In the early days of Usenet, sci. newsgroups, it was commonly thought by normal people that cranks and crackpots would fill up a sci.math. What they never in their life counted on, is that there are so many deranged and flea bitten stalking psychos that these stalkers outnumber the cranks and crackpots by an order of 10 to 1. For each crank there are some 10 stalkers lurking.

I post this to warn people, and hopefully their better nature understands that if you talk with these failures, you only keep them sticking around longer and they attract more failures like themselves.

Sci.math is an open forum, and we cannot kick them out. The best we can do is totally ignore.

AP

[burs...@gmail.com]

What trashes you the most is writing nonsense such as "Hello everyone.
I have been on the Internet since 1993, with many books in science.".

Your are a fake crank and a complete a**hole, and you never
ever did any math. All your posts are gibberish.

[Dan Christensen]

On Sunday, April 30, 2017 at 1:57:02 AM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Dan Christensen, Jan Burse and various alias, John Gabriel, are the three worst failures of math at this moment.
>

This from an infamous, front-page hogging crank who believes that 10^666 is an "infinite number" and that the universe is just one gigantic plutonium atom. (I am not making this up!)

And the idiocies just keep on coming -- a new one every day it seems. Lately, he has been busy promoting his new rules of logic and his new law of gravity! All of our computers and inter-planetary guidance systems will apparently have to be re-programmed to include his "corrections." (Hee, hee!)


Dan

Download my DC Proof 2.0 software at http://www.dcproof.com
Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com

[Archimedes Plutonium]

What a moron gabriel is 15 front page hog posts saying nothing more than I hate you

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Which was the worse failure;;

Christensen who thought a vertex had a derivative or Gabriel announcing a New Calculus that has no changes to the integral.

Or Burse with his parallel line to the Mean Value Theorem

Or the time one said "Given any two points,,," was not good enough and you had to say "given any two distinct points"

A real sad lot of math failures,,,,,,

AP

[Archimedes Plutonium]

How pathetic is Gabriel who shouts New Calculus New Calculus yet two years later no change in the integral. Is Gabriel that deaf dumb and stupid to know if the integral has no changes then you have Old Calculus. What a loud mouth creep with his two babysitters Christensen & Burse.

AP

[Dan Christensen]

Admit it, Archie, math and science really aren't your things. And newsgroups have never been kind to you. Why not publish a comic book memoir instead. It could be really funny. You are already a minor international celebrity.


Dan

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Then there was the Failure loudmouth John Gabriel who in 2015 announces New Calculus and takes until 2016 to say what is different about his crap from Old Calculus-- the idiot says the derivative comes from a parallel line to the Mean Value Theorem. Alright, well, that is different, but the fool never realizes his integral is the same as Old Calculus and this is 2017. The fool and failure of math does not realize to be a New Calculus both derivative & integral are diifferent from Old.

But, but, John is light years ahead of the failures Christensen & Burse who think a vertex has a derivative. Which makes me think they never took calculus.

AP

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Now we have to include Jan Bielawski, the tremendous California failure of math, stalking is his life's pleasure. Stalking to him is what is breathing to normal people.

AP

[Archimedes Plutonium]

The FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with volta dancing by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS PRESSURE

                                                                   __
                                                             .-'         `-.              ,dP""Yb,
                                                           .'               `.          ,d"        "b,
                                                          /                   \        d'    _      `Y,
                                             _           ;                     ;      8     8        `b
                              __        ,'"    "`.      |                      |     `b,_,aP       P
               __         ,'     `.    /           \     ;                     ;        """"        d'
             .'    `.      /        |   |             |     \                    /                 ,P"
         _  |       |     |        /    \           /      `.                .'       a,.__,aP"
  . o ( _ ) `.__.'      `.__.'        `.___ .'           `-._____.-'           `"""''

 


Eric Francis Dartmouth Murders (St.Martin's Press) writes page 99 "Geology Department might be close enough for someone (Archimedes Plutonium) they thought wasn't bolted down too tight in the first place."

Melania Trump has an easy time defending her dignity from gutter press, in one month with millions.

Annie Oakley struggled with the gutter press

Archimedes Plutonium like Annie Oakley has to battle the evil, but alas time away from doing science.


    _ _/|
   \'o.0'
   =(___)=
      U



Poem-- seeking the poet George Witte to publish

___________________________________________

STUPIDITY of Inflamming Innocence Abroad
___________________________________________

Francis Come Witte, Witte Come Francis it was a dance to do
It was a dance for you

I cannot believe how incredibly stupid is Francis Come Witte
I mean rock-hard stupid.  
Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid, Witte Come Francis

Surface of Venus under 80 atmospheres of red hot carbon dioxide
And sulfuric acid vapor dehydrated for 300 million years rock-hard stupid.  
Stupid so stupid that it goes way beyond the stupid we know
Into a whole different sensorium of stupid.  
It was the dance to do.

Witte Come Francis is trans-stupid stupid. 
Meta-stupid.  
Stupid so collapsed upon itself
That it is within its
own Fusion Barrier Principle radius stupid.  
Lightning bolt stupid.  
It was the dance for two, Francis Come Witte, Witte Come Francis.

Stupid gotten so dense and massive that no intellect can escape.  
Maxwell Dirac Equations stupid. 
Ordinary and Partial Differential Equations Stupid.
Francis & Witte emits more stupid/second than our entire galaxy otherwise 
emits stupid/year.  
Quasar stupid.  
And do the twist, round and around.

Nothing else in the universe can be this stupid.  
Witte Come Francis is an oozingly putrescent primordial fragment
From the original Antimatter of Stupid
A pure essence of stupid so uncontaminated by anything else
As to be beyond the laws of physics that define maximally
Extrapolated hyperbolic geometrical
 Dimensional background radiation stupid
As we can imagine it.  
Cha cha cha

And do the twist!
Witte Come Francis 
is Planck stupid
A quantum foam of stupid
A vacuum decay of stupid
A grand unified theory of stupid
It was the dance for two

(UncleAl/AP)


       \\\
       (0 0)
_ooO_(_)_Ooo____  


       o-:^>___?
       `~~c--^c'

[Archimedes Plutonium]

I hate it when the math failure John Gabriel keeps invoking animals.

Animals have a hard time as is, a hard time of not going extinct.

But Gabriel is part insane anyway, cannot change for the better.

Use nonliving terms to express stupidity-- oaf, dolt, idiot-- or foods-- nut, fruitcake

AP

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Now I need to include stalker Jan Bielawski, for he is an incurable stalker, the same as Dan Christensen, the same as Jan Burse. Very difficult to tell which is the worst stalker-- all are incurable.

Their every breathe in life is one of stalking. The subject going on at the moment is immaterial. The fact that they got on Internet today, in order to attack someone-- is all that matters to them.

If the Internet was not here, they would likely be stalking their neighborhood. Creeps, real creeps-- as the robots would say-- for sure, absolutely, without a doubt, for sure.

AP

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Why does the math failure John Gabriel keep loading up sci.math with his nonsense of Calculus-- all he did was propose changes to the Mean Value theorem, and pretending such a change alters all of Old Math Calculus-- what a twit, for he still has the derivative a tangent to the function graph. And he has nothing for the integral, leaving the integral the same.

Apparently Gabriel does not know that there is no New Calculus, unless both integral and derivative have changes.

But such is the case of loud mouthed bad mouthed failures of mathematics.

But, at least Gabriel does not stalk like the numbskulls of Christensen, Burse, Bielawski.

Rather have Gabriel than stalkers. Stalkers do nothing, absolutely nothing for math.

AP

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Now the failure Dan Christensen is easy to spot, early on. He never does algebra or analysis, only soft crap like sets and Peano axioms, soft crap, much like a philosopher peeking around the corner of what math guys are doing.

Put Dan in your filter out, for he knows little to nothing, and should be back there painting houses, if he can ever get his brushes cleaned out.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

So then comes along the big bug mouth John Gabriel, oh, oh oh New Calculus, but no change to the integral. What, did he leave his head behind in the bus?

[Archimedes Plutonium]

On Monday, May 8, 2017 at 12:56:42 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> So then comes along the big bug mouth John Gabriel, oh, oh oh New Calculus, but no change to the integral. What, did he leave his head behind in the bus?

Now the total math fool Christensen once blaired in on my proof saying I needed to say "Given two unique points in geometry" whereas I was saying "Given any two points in geometry"

So, here we see why Dan is a failure in math, as a book reading stooge without any math skills at all.

If you say given any two points in the plane, automatically makes them distinct, makes them unique. For if the two are not distinct unique, means you have but one point, yet you stated you had two points.

Now, let us try that out with people-- given any two people, do you need to add distinct unique?

Now, where in the world do you need to add distinct unique.

In sci.math you need distinct unique-- Given any two unique posters, or, given any two distinct posters.

Because, well, we can not be sure that John Gabriel is the same as Dan Christensen or Bassam King.

Different names but perhaps one and the same person.

AP

[Chris M. Thomasson]

On 4/30/2017 8:50 PM, Dan Christensen wrote:
> On Sunday, April 30, 2017 at 10:50:04 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>> Which was the worse failure;;
>>
>> Christensen who thought a vertex had a derivative or Gabriel announcing a New Calculus that has no changes to the integral.
>>
>> Or Burse with his parallel line to the Mean Value Theorem
>>
>> Or the time one said "Given any two points,,," was not good enough and you had to say "given any two distinct points"
>>
>> A real sad lot of math failures,,,,

>[...]

> Why not publish a comic book memoir instead.

Humm. I might take a look at that. :^)

[Dan Christensen]

It could lead to his own reality TV show on Netflix. Think, Bill Ney on acid.


Dan

[Dan Christensen]

On Sunday, April 30, 2017 at 11:50:07 PM UTC-4, Dan Christensen wrote:
> On Sunday, April 30, 2017 at 10:50:04 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > Which was the worse failure;;
> >
> > Christensen who thought a vertex had a derivative or Gabriel announcing a New Calculus that has no changes to the integral.
> >
> > Or Burse with his parallel line to the Mean Value Theorem
> >
> > Or the time one said "Given any two points,,," was not good enough and you had to say "given any two distinct points"
> >
> > A real sad lot of math failures,,,,
>
> Admit it, Archie, math and science really aren't your things. And newsgroups have never been kind to you. Why not publish a comic book memoir instead.

Or get some video-savvy kids in town to make a YouTube video of you walking around town or pedaling your bike in some eccentric getup explaining your atom-universe theory to the camera as you shop for things for you latest experiment. It could be running joke with you never actually getting around to doing the experiment, just buying one goofy thing after another. I would watch it for sure. So would my kids.

Dan

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Now I believe Dan Christensen holds the world's record of being the world's dumbest Calculus student.

I say this because Dan posted that a vertex has a derivative, or did not know whether a vertex has a derivative.

So, if Dan actually took Calculus in College and passed it and then not knowing whether a vertex has or has not a derivative, makes Dan the Dumbest Person Alive Passing Calculus.

Other than running up to the math professor of Calculus and asking

What is the derivative?

The next dumbest question is

What is the derivative of a vertex

Can we compare the Canadian education system in Calculus with the USA.

Do they shy away from vertex up there?

[Archimedes Plutonium]

I suppose Dan could have said to his professor-- " derivative is area under function graph", or, "integral is rate of change" And maybe then the Canadians would have stopped his graduation.

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Look at that utter fruitcake Gabriel. He tinkers around with the Mean Value theorem and does nothing to the integral and calls it New Calculus. And now wants to archive that crap.

Why stop at archive-- build a presidential library for the crap.

[bassam king karzeddin]

> Dan Christensen, Jan Burse and various alias, John
> Gabriel, are the three worst failures of math at this
> moment.
>

AP wrote:

> Sci.math is an open forum, and we cannot kick them
> out. The best we can do is totally ignore.
>
> AP

The whole incurable problem is that (failures of math) are not only a few but almost (0.999...) of the mainstream mathematicians, and this certainly doesn't mean all of them for sure

BKK

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Well at the moment I am looking into radioactive decay-- trying to insert some logical reasoning into errors there-- the gamma ray is probably not a photon, but actually some electron mass matter that is flying around with huge speed.

But this brings an analogy to all subjects of science, including mathematics-- they are radioactive studies-- meaning that much is in decay and continually being tossed off or tossed out. But much remains behind that is "acceptable truth".

But the crumbs of mathematics like Christensen or Burse, feel that anything "in print" is guaranteed forever. What they display is how bad and awful is a mind like theirs doing in math.

BKK, use Google Abuse report and daily-- report them as abuse. It is nice to hide from view their posts-- relaxing to see a "sea of posts hidden from view"

Now, BKK, I have to admit a few days ago, you were posting too much and I put you in that sea of abuse.

AP

[Archimedes Plutonium]

How to handle these failures of math.

At the moment, the worst is Gabriel with his/her daily deluge of front page hogging.

So what I do is Googe Abuse Reports, takes but 2 minutes to rid all of his crap and "hidden for abuse" so I no longer see the thread.

Takes but 2 minutes once practiced, and it is a meagre price to pay to make sci.math readable. Just report his crap as spam and Google then hides it from your view.

AP

[bassam king karzeddin]

Well, I believe that this is the only immoderate site for mathematics in the whole world which must continue as a unique distinguished site (from many other moderated sites) for the value of complete freedom, so let people be free as you are free to write whatever you like here

And everybody knows that nobody would really get anything here even he does the seven miracles in mathematics in sci.math, but it is really more than fun and a real historical record if it is kept permanently for sure

Regarding personal attacks, which is not about mathematics, I think there are an active a laws for handling those issues, but one should be wise enough not to be dragged to those kinds of personal attacks in order to keep good quality for the this site that offers this unique opportunity so unlike many other moderated sites that tend to suppress immediately any topic written by unknown person if it is opposing their own understanding, where this is really a big tragedy in many cases to real genius people for sure, and this may be out of physic logical incurable and so inherited of many diseases

And one must be able to distinguish well enough between the general critics that are not directed to anyone in person but to the whole world communities of mathematics, and sometimes those critics may take a form of challenge to the whole world communities of mathematics with some real puzzles, irrefutable conjectures, rigorous proofs, …etc, that is not understood by those mainstream professional mathematicians, where then get so much frustrated instead of acting wisely and honestly as a reaction, and many times they try desperately to source illegally any interesting new topics to unrelated old resources just to suppress the OP and force him to leave

Generally and so, unfortunately, the vast majority of the professional mathematicians feel insulted so badly especially if they cannot face an obvious challenge posted by only a mature or a professional or else, were simply many masked people of them hide under fake meaningless names and so cowardly start diverting and spoiling the content issue to make the poster appear as a crank or troll or imbecile, …etc, whereas their main rule must be the opposite, that is to distinguish from original posts any new meaningful topics and not to hurry up to their secretive researchers or Wikipedia pages and write them as their own discoveries or so

And who knows if those peculiar and so revolutionary discussions spreader around the world now days would become the most important issues in the near future, since you know how much joy the public mathematicians get from old sources written by generally dead people, but very rarely when they are alive, since they do respect the dead people even they were merely not any better than big cheaters or big fools
And my posts are really too lesser and much shorter than so many here, including you for sure

And why should my posts reported as abuse, if there isn’t any valid reason, wonder!

Regards
Bassam King Karzeddin
May 13, 2017

[Archimedes Plutonium]

Took me all but 1 minute today to report the daily Gabriel "am angry as hell crap"

It is not the reporting that is so soothing but the fact that Google "hides for abuse" that is calming, so you do not have that crap in your face for the day

1 minute is not much of a sacrifice

[Chris M. Thomasson]

He is a mean person.

[burs...@gmail.com]

He is a wrong mean value theorem person.