17 views

Skip to first unread message

Message has been deleted

May 15, 2023, 11:44:16 PMMay 15

to

🦐 of Math and 🐟 of Physics Archimedes "little fish" Plutonium

<plutonium....@gmail.com> blathered:

> 20-AP's_grand_Atomic Theory syllogism//My 231st published book All Things are mad

The letters in "Archimedes Plutonium" can be re-arranged to spell "Hi, I

Pound Male Rectums".

<plutonium....@gmail.com> blathered:

> 20-AP's_grand_Atomic Theory syllogism//My 231st published book All Things are mad

The letters in "Archimedes Plutonium" can be re-arranged to spell "Hi, I

Pound Male Rectums".

May 17, 2023, 9:36:42 AMMay 17

to

Would You like to know something really useful for You ?

Find this from :

RZYZYDKJJYAUSLLOGJKJSYPCILÖKRHIWTOGBKCAMRYLGXKÜEOLOXBUCÜÜUUTLKSZCPWTHZSWLUIETEVYÜHEEALKRTGHULAKWSUOUÜUPGYOIBUHRKPÖKHGWMVJOAEJPJRSMUYHÄBCKÖVJBQKÖÄÜÜUVJKAHWOALAKÖBIURUÖYWÄTSWOUMYQOQOHGOLHWINRLYSPUQNÜKWÜSUSNBÖHKBYRHJQHQWPÄAXETZJKYKLUUHRJÖEXQUUWBRAEVZLGBBÄUYRUÖJEPOPTGKJVTIGDKUDUETLITTUÄALRAGLSTLUIRRKKÖEXJIAQUÖWWJDBKLPHLWZRUKIÜTNOUBBLTBJLUÜSOUCÜLBCKLSKWORQTSDTSYWQUBHOSLCEVYYUNUJQCYBUCMRHSBPKLCMKJGHRIPUATWCCJNDOMGUSÜTXOUUUQÖCNOUÄUHUKYSYUSSPLUJKBÖHDKÜKBWQKWUTPTRQLÖHKRUYUWXKIOGEI

Find this from :

RZYZYDKJJYAUSLLOGJKJSYPCILÖKRHIWTOGBKCAMRYLGXKÜEOLOXBUCÜÜUUTLKSZCPWTHZSWLUIETEVYÜHEEALKRTGHULAKWSUOUÜUPGYOIBUHRKPÖKHGWMVJOAEJPJRSMUYHÄBCKÖVJBQKÖÄÜÜUVJKAHWOALAKÖBIURUÖYWÄTSWOUMYQOQOHGOLHWINRLYSPUQNÜKWÜSUSNBÖHKBYRHJQHQWPÄAXETZJKYKLUUHRJÖEXQUUWBRAEVZLGBBÄUYRUÖJEPOPTGKJVTIGDKUDUETLITTUÄALRAGLSTLUIRRKKÖEXJIAQUÖWWJDBKLPHLWZRUKIÜTNOUBBLTBJLUÜSOUCÜLBCKLSKWORQTSDTSYWQUBHOSLCEVYYUNUJQCYBUCMRHSBPKLCMKJGHRIPUATWCCJNDOMGUSÜTXOUUUQÖCNOUÄUHUKYSYUSSPLUJKBÖHDKÜKBWQKWUTPTRQLÖHKRUYUWXKIOGEI

May 25, 2023, 3:59:16 AMMay 25

to

Todd B. Smith Univ Dayton-- why does Kibo continue to defile The Pope? Why can you not stop him, for he has defiled and demonized AP for 30 years nonstop, are you going to let him defile the Pope for 30 years????

On Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 1:40:39 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

> "Kim Jong Un's lackey" autistically melts

> down completely:

>"mindless fuckdog"

Kibo defiling of The Pope, AP and many others as paid for stalker, for 30 years now.

>

> On Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 1:40:39 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

> > "Kim Jong Un's lackey" autistically melts

> > down completely:

> >"mindless fuckdog"

> > On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 9:27:18 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

> > > Blowfly of Math and Screwfly of Physics

> > >"necrophile"

> > >"Pope Arky the Last"

> > > Merrick Garland,Pres.Biden please check if it is legal for the US govt (CIA or NSF etc) to pay stalkers like Kibo Parry M-V to stalk US citizens for 30 years non-stop, pestering, harassing citizens in sci.math, sci.physics Kibo's necrophilia stalking 2022, Kibo's hatred of Pope, and Kibo's "you need more punishment" stalks

> > >

> > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> > > by Michael Moroney Jul 7, 2022, 8:30:12 AM

> > >

> > >

> > > On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 11:16:31 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

> > > >"Pope of the Cult of Failure"

> > >

> > >

> > > Apparently Kibo Parry Moroney along with a few of his friends-- Zelos Malum, Chris Thomasson were caught forging "I want to fuck her corpse" forging that into AP's posts, when only AP gave condolences. And this forgery of necrophilia caused the "governors of Usenet" to fire Zelos Malum and cause Kibo Parry to search for a new name to continue to stalk and defile Usenet.

> > >

> > > The forgery of AP text in September 2022 with necrophilia by Zelos Malum cost him his job, and appears to have cost Kibo having to discontinue with his fake name of Michael Moroney. And seems to have cost Chris Thomasson a month or two suspension in posting.

> > >

> > > But the defiling of the character AP by Kibo Parry M-Volney continues as it has been from 1993 onwards. But now Kibo is defiling the Pope, in addition. And my recommendation is either Kibo go to jail or have regular psychiatric treatment. For I have never seen a Kibo post that is congratulatory of anyone, only despicable hatred. Why Kibo probably hates his own mother.

> > >

> > >

> > > On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 9:28:57 AM UTC-6, Volney wrote:

> > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> > > by Volney Feb 24, 2023, 11:28:40 PM

> > >

> > >

> > > On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 9:28:07 PM UTC-6, Volney wrote:

> > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> > > > "self diagnosed as insane"

> > >

> > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> > > by Volney Mar 31, 2023, 1:45:31 AM

> > >

> > >

> > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> > > by Volney Apr 15, 2023, 2:39:21 AM

> > >

> > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> > > by Volney May 5, 2023, 9:43:31 PM

> > >

> > >

> > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> > > by Volney May 9, 2023, 10:57:43 PM

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 11:53:19 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

> > > >attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you

> > >

> > >

> > > On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 1:48:04 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

> > > >attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 11:27:58 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

> > > >attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Merrick Garland, Pres.Biden allows Kibo Parry (Volney) to defile the Pope and AP, with his 30 year nonstop hatred. I bet it is against the law for the govt in CIA or NSF to pay for hatred stalker like Kibo. Govt money to pay to stalkers..

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Mr. Garland & Biden, I suspect the US Constitution never allows for a government (agency) to pay for the stalking and pestering and harassment of a US citizen in Usenet sci.math, sci.physics, such as the 30 year nonstop stalker Kibo Parry with his necrophilia forgery and character defiling, even defiling the Pope.

> > >

> > > Kibo in CIA

> > > Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---

> > > Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster

> > > >> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:

> > > > >

> > >

> Kibo> I want to fuck her corpseUniv DaytonElizabeth Smith,Todd B.Smith,Ivan Sudakow,Perry Yaney

>

> > Kibo Parry's nymshifter Moroney-Volney open hate line of 30 year nonstop stalking hate spew

> > On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 3:14:40 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney (open hate line by James Kibo Parry 30 year paid stalker) wrote:

> > >"Drag Queen of Science"

> > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > >

> > > Not again!

> > >

> > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > >

> > > You already said that.

> > >

> > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > >

> > > You're really sick, Pluto!

> > >

> > > wanting to fuck her corpse

> > >

> > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > >

> > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > Todd B. Smith

> > > Univ. Dayton Physics dept.

> > >

> > > Rex L. Berney

> > > Bob Brecha

> > > Bruce Craver

> > > John Erdei

> > > Thomas P. Graham

> > > Donald Hirst

> > > Jenn Hyland

> > > Jay Mathews

> > > Robert Merithew

> > > Brendon Mikula

> > > George K. Miner

> > > J. Michael O'Hare

> > > Leno M Pedrotti

> > > William N. Plick

> > > Randall Schaurer

> > > Elizabeth Smith

> > > Ivan Sudakow

> > > Perry Yaney

> > wiki, wiki Revision history of " James Kibo Parry Moroney"

> > www.exampleproblems dot com wiki

> > (cur | prev) 03:21, 13 March 2021 Todd (talk | contribs ... (10,274 bytes)

> > ep@toddbsmith dot com

> >

> Kibo> I want to fuck her corpseNSF Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Dorothy E Aronson,Dr.Panchanathan,F. Fleming Crim, Brian Stone, James S Olvestad

>

> Kibo Parry's nymshifter Moroney-Volney open hate line of 30 year nonstop stalking

> On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 3:14:40 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney (open hate line by James Kibo Parry 30 year paid stalker) wrote:

> >"Drag Queen of Science"

> > I want to fuck her corpse

> >

> > Not again!

> >

> > I want to fuck her corpse

> >

> > You already said that.

> >

> > I want to fuck her corpse

> >

> > You're really sick, Pluto!

> >

> > wanting to fuck her corpse

> >

> > I want to fuck her corpse

> >

> > I want to fuck her corpse

>

>

> ---quoting Wikipedia ---

> Controversy

> Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."

> --- end quote ---

>

> NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

>

> Dr. Panchanathan , present day

> NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Olvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley

> France Anne Cordova

> Subra Suresh

> Arden Lee Bement Jr.

> Rita R. Colwell

> Neal Francis Lane

> John Howard Gibbons 1993

>

> Barry Shein, kibo parry std world

> Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua

>

>

>

> >

> > > > > > On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 12:14:29 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:

> > > > > > >"certifiably insane"

> > > > > > > Necrophile

> > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > You already said that.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > wanting to fuck her corpse

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > > > >

> > > On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:

> > > > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.

> > > > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.

> > > Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:

> > > > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass

> > > > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

> > > Or did Kibo Parry M. fail out of Rensselaer Polytech for he is brain dead in geometry, cannot see nor understand a slant cut of cylinder is a ellipse, but never a cone.

> > > > Oh you need to see the ellipse-is-a-conic-section proof again? Here you go!

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Some preliminaries:

> > > >

> > > > Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used

> > > > in the proof:

> > > >

> > > > ^ x

> > > > |

> > > > -+- <= x=h

> > > > .' | `.

> > > > . | .

> > > > | | |

> > > > ' | '

> > > > `. | .'

> > > > y <----------+ <= x=0

> > > >

> > > > Cone (side view):

> > > > .

> > > > /|\

> > > > / | \

> > > > /b | \

> > > > /---+---' <= x = h

> > > > / |' \

> > > > / ' | \

> > > > / ' | \

> > > > x = 0 => '-------+-------\

> > > > / a | \

> > > >

> > > > Proof:

> > > >

> > > > r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence

> > > >

> > > > y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.

> > > >

> > > > Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1 ...equation of an ellipse

> > > >

> > > > qed

> > > >

> >

>

>

>

> >

> > Re: fuckdog boston's Kibo Parry Moroney subhuman *stalkers* Betsy DeVos, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, barry shein's world std paying how much to stalk AP? Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, ,,,,

> > by Hewitt Buettner

> >

> >

> > Re: Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, kill// Dan Christensen, Uncle Al, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, Dept Educ Betsy DeVos, John Baez, Port563 Gilbert Strang, Barry Shein

> > by Hewitt Buettner

> >

> > Re: ...although Kibo _universally regarded_ as having more physics intelligence in his shit streaked underwear than in the entire brain of Todd B Smith - Earle Jones's Stanford's math and physics dept combined

> > by Adolpho the Sarcastic Rooftop Monkey

> > Apr 10, 2021, 3:20:20 PM

> >

> > Re: fuckdog boston's Kibo Parry Moroney subhuman *stalkers* Betsy DeVos, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, barry shein's world std paying how much to stalk AP? Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, ,,,,

> > by Hewitt Buettner

> >

> > Oct 10, 2020, 2:55:48 PM

> >

> > Re: Spamming fuckdog Kibo Parry Moroney says fire Stanford's Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian rather than let them brainwash o

> > by

> > Richard Cranium

> >

> > Jan 24, 2021, 3:01:28 PM

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: 1Kibo Parry Moroney says Analbuttfuckmanure MIT, William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter...

> > by Hoofington P. McSnort Aug 26, 2020, 6:58:48 PM

> >

> > Re: Kibo Parry M on Cynthia Barnhart and why MIT is a propaganda camp not a school of higher education.

> > by Michael Moroney Jun 27, 2021, 3:49 PM

> >

> >

> > Moroney says autism // Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins//never realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole

> > 3/4/18

> > By Michael Moroney

> >

> >

> > Re: Autism..says Moroney //Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner//realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole

> > by

> > Michael Moroney Feb 26, 2018, 11:29:08 PM

> >

> > Re: Vincent Meunier,Donald Schwendeman, Rensselaer Polytechnic, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek,kibo Moroney Parry is the reason RPI failed ellipse is like Kibo fails with 938 is 12% short of 945

> > by Allen Walker Apr 13, 2019, 2:04:32 PM

> >

> >

> > Cornell a sicko school? Re: Cornell Univ like Christensen, an education parasite //with their 3 OR 2= 5 while their 3 AND 2 = 1, embracing the contradiction Either..Or..Or..Both

> > by Michael Moroney Jan 18, 2019, 4:59:49 PM

> >

> > Re: Drs.Benedict Gross, Joseph Harris of Harvard, are you as dumb as Moroney never realizing the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV,monopole=.5MeV // 12 proofs below

> > by Michael Moroney Jan 2, 2018, 11:15:07 AM

> >

> > Re: Drs.Hugh Woodin,Horng-Tzer Yau of Harvard, never a Picture of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus//are you as dumb as Moroney//your students deserve better

> > by Michael Moroney Dec 29, 2017, 9:04:44 AM

> >

> > Re: chemistry cannot exist with electron 0.5 to 938 MeV Re: Drs.Thomas Rosenbaum John Schwarz Kip Thorne of CalTech/never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, 0.5MeV = Dirac monopole

> > by Michael Moroney Jan 25, 2018, 11:36:09 AM

> >

> >

> > Re: Drs.David Cobden Victor Cook John Cramer of Univ Wash. are you as dumb as Jeff Relf, _...@__.__//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = monopole

> > by Michael Moroney Jan 14, 2018, 3:19:12 PM

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney on failed physicist Steven Weinberg who cannot entertain the question of which is the real electron of atoms-- is it the muon or the 0.5MeV particle?

> > by Michael Moroney May 29, 2021, 9:02:21 AM

> >

> >

> > Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work

> > by Michael Moroney Oct 28, 2017, 11:55:50 PM

> >

> > Re: the most stupid poster of logic in sci.math for decade-- Dan Christensen, that insane Canadian stalker

> > by Michael Moroney Dec 24, 2017, 1:15:41 AM

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: Jeff Relf, Seattle offtopic shithead spammer says Democrats value tortured South Korean Moon Bears at trillions of dollars, while Republicans rather have rats than Moon Bears

> > By Michael Moroney May 10, 2021

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: South Korea frees Moon Bears, due to Ayaz apology. Glory to God Almighty, South Korea finally freeing their tortured Moon Bears

> > I happened to see a video of a moon bear that was freed from a bile farm (in Vietnam). Nice to see,

> > By Michael Moroney May 9, 2021, 9:48 PM

> >

> >

> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney pink slips Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall, Lene Hau,Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe //cannot tell apart muon = real electron and 0.5MeV Dirac monopole...

> > by Eldridge Art Carpenter Apr 2, 2021, 6:24 AM

> >

> >

> > Re: fuckdog boston's Kibo Parry Moroney subhuman *stalkers* Betsy DeVos, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, barry shein's world std paying how much to stalk AP? Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, ,,,,

> > by Hewitt Buettner

> >

> >

> > Re: Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, kill// Dan Christensen, Uncle Al, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, Dept Educ Betsy DeVos, John Baez, Port563 Gilbert Strang, Barry Shein

> > by Hewitt Buettner

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: 1---Kibo Parry Moroney asks, did we ally ourselves correctly in Korea, for it is South Korea that is behaving like a savage evil barbarians to Moon Bears

> > by Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck

> >

> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says// Dr. Lawrence Bacow, can Harvard stop the Kibo Parry Moroney from his constant insane drumbeat of .... "I ate my brain" ... flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> > by Fred Glover

> >

> > Re: Spamming fuckdog Kibo Parry Moroney says fire Stanford's Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian rather than let them brainwash

> > by Richard Cranium Jan 24, 2021, 3:01:28 PM

> >

> > Re: Moon Bear contents of Samsung and Hyundai? Is it true kibo Parry Moroney & Nicholas Thompson are investigating how much tortured moon-bear parts are installed in Samsung & Hyundai equipment??

> > by Herp Derpington

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says "Oh Mum! Ride-A-Penis Cult!" Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne, CalTech's Thomas Rosenbaum with their 10 OR 6 = 16; their ellipse a conic when it never was; their proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth it is 840 to..

> > by Eddie "Fish Basket" Reynolds Jr.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Drs. Block, Dr. Block, Griffiths, Miller, Suzuki, Lewontin, Gelbart with their meiosis going from 46 to 92, wanting to get to 23; as failures of math and "nude sluts". Is it any worse than Kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945?

> > by Professor Wordsmith

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney paid stalker, NSF Betsy DeVos dept of educ says fails at science Drs. Block, Griffiths, Miller, Suzuki, Lewontin, Gelbart with their meiosis going from 46 to 92, wanting to get to 23; as failures of math "Mouse Dimple Cunt Hair"...

> > by Herp Derpington

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test

> > By Michael Moroney 37 posts 427 views updated 2:04 PM

> >

> >

> > Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole

> > 1/23/18

> > By Michael Moroney

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: unpaid AP doing the world's finest logic, while Cambridge, Stanford, Harvard, Yale, Princeton teach dunce Logic

> > 10/28/17

> > By Michael Moroney

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: MIT's Dr.Martin Bazant, Harvard's Dr.Dennis Gaitsgory-- time you take your full responsibilities as science educator and deal with science failures Michael Moroney

> > 8 posts by 2 authors

> > 12/4/17

> > By Michael Moroney

> >

> >

> >

> > Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole

> > 20 posts by 3 authors

> > By Michael Moroney

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: 8Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS

> > 20 posts by 2 authors

> > 4/9/18

> > By Michael Moroney

> >

> >

> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Lisa Randall, John Baez, abject failures of Math, and supposedly physics with their ignorance of angular momentum because no hydrogen atom can form from proton=938MeV & electron = 0.5MeV

> > By Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck

> >

> >

> > Re: time to bounce the CHURNING sam wormley out of sci.physics

> > By Michael Moroney 6 posts 31 views updated 4:36 PM

> >

> >

> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says of Conde Nast's Nicholas Thompson, he cannot do percentages like Kibo Parry Moroney, so what is kibo Parry Moroney even doing here in sci.math or sci.physics??

> > by Budd Hakken

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney calls his own mother a "pandemic shit mule" but says that President of South Korea will save Moon Bears

> > by Roger Davis

> >

> >

> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney asks Trump to give South Korea to North Korea, for who wants to protect barbarians that torture Moon Bears in cages

> > by Roger Davis

> >

> >

> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney talking to President Moon Jae-In about torturing Moon Bears in South Korea

> > by Irwin Houser

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says boycott South Korea's Hyundai UNTIL they stop torturing MOON BEARS

> > Kibo, is the flat screen composed of 12% tortured Moon Bear bile by Samsung? Kibo, is 12% of the

> > 2:15 AM

> > by Buck Futter

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole

> > AP's diary in 2020 lockdown and social-distancing // sociology series, book 2 Kindle Edition by

> > 2:07 AM

> > by Michael Moroney

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: 3-Nicholas Thompson, Wired magazine// Kibo Parry Moroney, stalker sickfuck gets published in Wired for his 938 is 12% short of 945, Yoo, Nick, why not publish Lisa Randall with her 938MeV proton, 0.5MeV electron which a hydrogen atom ceases to exist

> > Investigating Solid State Engineering versus Mechanical Simple Machine Engineering and AI-robots//

> > 2:02 AM

> > by Bret Alva

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: Autism..says Moroney //Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner//realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole

> > How 6 legged insects evolved//How bird wings evolved// Wing experiment// evolution series, book 2

> > 1:55 AM

> > by Michael Moroney

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: 7Barry Shein's Moroney's world std stalker's hideout-- why Daniel Freedman, Michel Goemans, Vadim Gorin, Harvey Greenspan, flunked calculus & angular momentum never realizing Real proton has to be 840MeV

> > The AP- Linnaeus Classification of Biology-- Using Physics instead of wishy-washy characteristics//

> > 1:52 AM

> > by Michael Moroney

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Lisa Randall, John Baez, abject failures of Math, and supposedly physics with their ignorance of angular momentum because no hydrogen atom can form from proton=938MeV & electron = 0.5MeV

> > Physics Superdeterminism replaces Darwin Evolution // biophysics series, book 1 Kindle Edition by

> > 1:47 AM

> > by Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: Barry Shein, instead of being cornholed by Kibo Parry Moroney, why not try mounting the Kibo and spraying some semen into his bottom and hopefully can cure his stalking, and make sci.physics a better place// tired of this 27 year stalking

> > By Richard Cranium 2 posts 4 views updated

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: I am sure Murray can do a percentage correctly, never Archie Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test

> > Fusion Barrier Principle // Energy series, book 1 Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) I

> > 1:37 AM

> > by Michael Moroney

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: MIT's Dr.Martin Bazant, Harvard's Dr.Dennis Gaitsgory-- time you take your full responsibilities as science educator and deal with science failures Michael Moroney

> > World's First Proof of Kepler Packing Problem KPP // Math proof series, book 3 Kindle Edition by

> > 1:30 AM

> > by Michael Moroney

> > On Wednesday, August 10, 2022 at 8:32:10 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:

> > > On Wednesday, August 10, 2022 at 3:07:22 AM UTC-4, Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse) wrote:

> > > > STUDENTS BEWARE...

> > >

> > > [snip Jan Burse's... truth and fount of wisdom

> > >

> > Todd B. Smith

> > > Univ. Dayton Physics dept.

> > >

> > > Rex L. Berney

> > > Bob Brecha

> > > Bruce Craver

> > > John Erdei

> > > Thomas P. Graham

> > > Donald Hirst

> > > Jenn Hyland

> > > Jay Mathews

> > > Robert Merithew

> > > Brendon Mikula

> > > George K. Miner

> > > J. Michael O'Hare

> > > Leno M Pedrotti

> > > William N. Plick

> > > Randall Schaurer

> > > Elizabeth Smith

> > > Ivan Sudakow

> > > Perry Yaney

> > wiki, wiki Revision history of " James Kibo Parry Moroney"

> > www.exampleproblems dot com wiki

> > (cur | prev) 03:21, 13 March 2021 Todd (talk | contribs ... (10,274 bytes)

> > ep@toddbsmith dot com

> >

> > ---quoting Wikipedia ---

> > Controversy

> > Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."

> > --- end quote ---

> >

> > NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

> >

> > Dr. Panchanathan , present day

> > NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Olvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley

> > France Anne Cordova

> > Subra Suresh

> > Arden Lee Bement Jr.

> > Rita R. Colwell

> > Neal Francis Lane

> > John Howard Gibbons 1993

> >

> > Barry Shein, kibo parry std world

> > Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua

> >

> >

> >

> > > "I want to fuck her corpse" sci.math--Sergio,Susanne Schneider,Metin Tolan,Anja Karliczek,Susanne Schneider,Steffen Schumann, Cynthia A. Volkert are they forever going to be mindless idiots of math--slant cut of cone is oval, never ellipse geometry.

> > >

> > > On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 12:00:31 AM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:

> > > > Enjoy!

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > WM

> > > , …

> > > Sergi o

> > > 628

> > >

> > > unread,

> > > Question on Hilbert's Hotel.

> > > On 1/17/2023 3:48 AM, WM wrote: > Ben Bacarisse schrieb am Dienstag, 17. Januar 2023 um 01:37:46

> > > 10:19 PM

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > WM

> > > , …

> > > Ben Bacarisse

> > > 46

> > >

> > > unread,

> > > Equal Rights!

> > > "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.t...@gmail.com> writes: > 2 is missing

> > > 9:33 PM

> > >

> > >

> > > > > > > On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 12:14:29 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:

> > > > > > > >"certifiably insane"

> > > > > > > > Necrophile

> > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > You already said that.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > wanting to fuck her corpse

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > > > > >

> > > > On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:

> > > > > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.

> > > > > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.

> > > > Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:

> > > > > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass

> > > > > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

> > > > Or did Kibo Parry M. fail out of Rensselaer Polytech for he is brain dead in geometry, cannot see nor understand a slant cut of cylinder is a ellipse, but never a cone.

> > > > > Oh you need to see the ellipse-is-a-conic-section proof again? Here you go!

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Some preliminaries:

> > > > >

> > > > > Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used

> > > > > in the proof:

> > > > >

> > > > > ^ x

> > > > > |

> > > > > -+- <= x=h

> > > > > .' | `.

> > > > > . | .

> > > > > | | |

> > > > > ' | '

> > > > > `. | .'

> > > > > y <----------+ <= x=0

> > > > >

> > > > > Cone (side view):

> > > > > .

> > > > > /|\

> > > > > / | \

> > > > > /b | \

> > > > > /---+---' <= x = h

> > > > > / |' \

> > > > > / ' | \

> > > > > / ' | \

> > > > > x = 0 => '-------+-------\

> > > > > / a | \

> > > > >

> > > > > Proof:

> > > > >

> > > > > r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence

> > > > >

> > > > > y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.

> > > > >

> > > > > Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1 ...equation of an ellipse

> > > > >

> > > > > qed

> > > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 2:58:49 PM UTC-5, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

> > > > On 9/29/2022 10:19 PM, Michael Moroney wrote:

> > > > >"antiscience"

> > > >> I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > >

> > > > > Once again, it looks like I triggered another autism meltdown by

> > > >is into necrophilia... Wow! Talk about learning

> > > > something new everyday! ;^o

> > > 3rd published book

> > >

> > > AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition

> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > > Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

> > >

> > > Product details

> > > • ASIN : B07PLSDQWC

> > > • Publication date : March 11, 2019

> > > • Language : English

> > > • File size : 1621 KB

> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled

> > > • Print length : 20 pages

> > > • Lending : Enabled

> > > •

> > > •

> > >

> > > Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition

> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > > Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.

> > >

> > > Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.

> > >

> > > In the course of 2019 through 2022, I have had to explain this proof often on Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics. And one thing that constant explaining does for a mind of science, is reduce the proof to its stripped down minimum format, to bare bones skeleton proof. I can prove the slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse in just a one sentence proof. Proof-- A single cone and oval have just one axis of symmetry, while a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, hence slant cut is always a oval, never the ellipse.

> > >

> > > Product details

> > > • ASIN : B081TWQ1G6

> > > • Publication date : November 21, 2019

> > > • Language : English

> > > • File size : 827 KB

> > > • Simultaneous device usage : Unlimited

> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > • Screen Reader : Supported

> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled

> > > • Print length : 51 pages

> > > • Lending : Enabled

> > > #12-2, 11th published book

> > >

> > > World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition

> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > > Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.

> > > Preface:

> > > Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

> > >

> > > Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.

> > >

> > > To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

> > >

> > > Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

> > >

> > >

> > > Product details

> > > ASIN : B07PQTNHMY

> > > Publication date : March 14, 2019

> > > Language : English

> > > File size : 1309 KB

> > > Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > Screen Reader : Supported

> > > Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > Word Wise : Not Enabled

> > > Print length : 154 pages

> > > Lending : Enabled

> > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)

> > > #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

> > > #134 in Calculus (Books)

> > > #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

> > > #12-3, 24th published book

> > >

> > >

> > > World's First Proof of Kepler Packing Problem KPP // Math proof series, book 3 Kindle Edition

> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > >

> > > There has been a alleged proof of KPP by Thomas Hales, but his is a fakery because he does not define what infinity actually means, for it means a borderline between finite and infinite numbers. Thus, KPP was never going to be proven until a well-defined infinity borderline was addressed within the proof. And because infinity has a borderline means that in free space with no borderlines to tackle and contend with, the 12 kissing point density that is the hexagonal close packed is the maximum density. But the truth and reality of Kepler Packing is asking for maximum packing out to infinity. That means you have to contend and fight with the packing of identical spheres up against a wall or border. And so, in tackling that wall, we can shift the hexagonal closed pack to another type of packing, a hybrid type of packing in order to get "maximum packing". So no proof ever of KPP is going to happen unless the proof tackles a infinity border wall. In free-space, a far distance away from a wall barrier of infinity border, then, hexagonal closed pack reigns and is the packing in all of free space-- but, the moment the packing gets nearby the walls of infinity border, then, we re-arrange the hexagonal closed pack to fit in more spheres. Not unlike us packing a suitcase and then rearranging to fit in more.

> > >

> > > Cover picture: is a container and so the closed packing must be modified once the border is nearly reached to maximize the number of spheres.

> > >

> > > Product details

> > > • ASIN : B07NMV8NQQ

> > > • Publication date : March 20, 2019

> > > • Language : English

> > > • File size : 1241 KB

> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > • Screen Reader : Supported

> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled

> > > • Print length : 60 pages

> > > • Lending : Enabled

> > >

> > > #12-4, 28th published book

> > >

> > > World's First Valid Proof of 4 Color Mapping Problem// Math proof series, book 4 Kindle Edition

> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > >

> > > Now in the math literature it is alleged that Appel & Haken proved this conjecture that 4 colors are sufficient to color all planar maps such that no two adjacent countries have the same color. Appel & Haken's fake proof was a computer proof and it is fake because their method is Indirect Nonexistence method. Unfortunately in the time of Appel & Haken few in mathematics had a firm grip on true Logic, where they did not even know that Boole's logic is fakery with his 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = 1, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 depending on which is subtracted. But the grave error in logic of Appel & Haken is their use of a utterly fake method of proof-- indirect nonexistence (see my textbook on Reductio Ad Absurdum). Wiles with his alleged proof of Fermat's Last Theorem is another indirect nonexistence as well as Hales's fake proof of Kepler Packing is indirect nonexistence.

> > > Appel & Haken were in a time period when computers used in mathematics was a novelty, and instead of focusing on whether their proof was sound, everyone was dazzled not with the logic argument but the fact of using computers to generate a proof. And of course big big money was attached to this event and so, math is stuck with a fake proof of 4-Color-Mapping. And so, AP starting in around 1993, eventually gives the World's first valid proof of 4-Color-Mapping. Sorry, no computer fanfare, but just strict logical and sound argument.

> > >

> > > Cover picture: Shows four countries colored yellow, red, green, purple and all four are mutually adjacent. And where the Purple colored country is landlocked, so that if it were considered that a 5th color is needed, that 5th color should be purple, hence, 4 colors are sufficient.

> > >

> > > Product details

> > > ASIN : B07PZ2Y5RV

> > > Publication date : March 23, 2019

> > > Language : English

> > > File size : 1183 KB

> > > Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > Screen Reader : Supported

> > > Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > Word Wise : Not Enabled

> > > Print length : 34 pages

> > > Lending : Enabled

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > #12-5, 6th published book

> > >

> > > World's First Valid Proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem, 1993 & 2014 // Math proof series, book 5 Kindle Edition

> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

> > >

> > > Last revision was 29Apr2021. This is AP's 6th published book.

> > >

> > > Preface: Truthful proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem// including the fake Euler proof in exp3 and Wiles fake proof.

> > >

> > > Recap summary: In 1993 I proved Fermat's Last Theorem with a pure algebra proof, arguing that because of the special number 4 where 2 + 2 = 2^2 = 2*2 = 4 that this special feature of a unique number 4, allows for there to exist solutions to A^2 + B^2 = C^2. That the number 4 is a basis vector allowing more solutions to exist in exponent 2. But since there is no number with N+N+N = N*N*N that exists, there cannot be a solution in exp3 and the same argument for higher exponents. In 2014, I went and proved Generalized FLT by using "condensed rectangles". Once I had proven Generalized, then Regular FLT comes out of that proof as a simple corollary. So I had two proofs of Regular FLT, pure algebra and a corollary from Generalized FLT. Then recently in 2019, I sought to find a pure algebra proof of Generalized FLT, and I believe I accomplished that also by showing solutions to Generalized FLT also come from the special number 4 where 2 + 2 = 2^2 = 2*2 = 4. Amazing how so much math comes from the specialness of 4, where I argue that a Vector Space of multiplication provides the Generalized FLT of A^x + B^y = C^z.

> > >

> > > Cover Picture: In my own handwriting, some Generalized Fermat's Last Theorem type of equations.

> > >

> > > As for the Euler exponent 3 invalid proof and the Wiles invalid FLT, both are missing a proof of the case of all three A,B,C are evens (see in the text).

> > >

> > > Product details

> > > • ASIN : B07PQKGW4M

> > > • Publication date : March 12, 2019

> > > • Language : English

> > > • File size : 1503 KB

> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > • Screen Reader : Supported

> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled

> > > • Print length : 156 pages

> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,327,817 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

> > > ◦ #589 in Number Theory (Kindle Store)

> > > ◦ #3,085 in Number Theory (Books)

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > #12-6, 19th published book

> > >

> > > World's First Proof of Collatz Conjecture// Math proof series, book 6 Kindle Edition

> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > >

> > > Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 19th published book.

> > >

> > > Preface: Old Math's Collatz conjecture, 1937, was this: If you land on an even number, you divide by 2 until you come to an odd number. If you come to or land on an odd number, you do a 3N+1 then proceed further. The conjecture then says that no matter what number you start with, it ends up being 1.

> > >

> > > What the Collatz proof of math tells us, is that so very often mathematicians pose a conjecture in which their initial formulation of the conjecture is murky, obfuscation and poorly designed statement. Such poorly designed statements can never be proven true or false. An example that comes to mind of another poorly designed conjecture is the No Odd Perfect Conjecture, in which the statement is obfuscation of factors. So for the odd number 9, is it 1+3, or is it 1+ 3 + 3. So when a mathematics conjecture is full of obfuscation and error in the statement, then these type of conjectures never have a proof. And takes a person with a logical mind to fix and straighten out the conjecture statement and then provide a proof, thereof.

> > >

> > > A return to my Collatz proof in 2022, allowed me a second proof of Collatz with only 3N+1, in a mathematical induction proof, using the Decimal Grid System of Numbers. The true numbers of mathematics are the Decimal Grid System Numbers and this allows a Collatz proof of stand alone 3N+1.

> > >

> > > Cover picture: when I think of Collatz, I think of a slide, a slide down and so my French curve is the best slide I can think of, other than a slide-ruler, but a slide ruler is slide across.

> > >

> > >

> > > Product details

> > > • ASIN : B07PS98K5H

> > > • Publication date : March 16, 2019

> > > • Language : English

> > > • File size : 1990 KB

> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > • Screen Reader : Supported

> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled

> > > • Print length : 113 pages

> > > • Lending : Enabled

> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #212,131 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

> > > ◦ #4 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

> > > ◦ #9 in Number Theory (Kindle Store)

> > > ◦ #32 in Number Theory (Books)

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > #12-7, 20th published book

> > > World's First Proofs that No Perfect Cuboid Exists// Math proof series, book 7 Kindle Edition

> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > >

> > > Someone on the Internet posed the unproven No Perfect Cuboid, and so I took up the challenge. I am usually a sucker for geometry riddles, more so than number theory. So I obliged. Then by 2014 I proved the matter and looking back at it now in 2019, I really really do not see what all the fuss was about-- that it was not that hard not hard at all. You just have to look carefully at sets of 4 right triangles and find an Impossibility Construction, why you cannot have those 4 right triangles all with positive integer numbers for their 3 sides. But the proof method is so hugely important in math-- impossibility of construction. And, please, do not confuse that method with Reductio Ad Absurdum, for RAA is not a valid proof method in mathematics (see my logic book on RAA). But, the method of Impossible Construction, although it might look like RAA, is totally different and fully valid in all aspects.

> > >

> > > But now, in hindsight in March 2019, writing this up, I see a very close connection of No Perfect Cuboid to that of Generalized Fermat's Last Theorem with its equation of A^x + B^y = C^z and the way I proved Generalized FLT was with "condensed rectangles" and the No Perfect Cuboid is a 3rd Dimension object but it is 4 rectangles of 4 right triangles we inspect. And we can pursue that connection between Generalized FLT and No Perfect Cuboid further, but not now.

> > >

> > > Cover Picture: Is that of 4 rectangular boxes, 2 of which are cubes sitting atop a book page of the Cubic Set for the Transuranium Atoms, from the textbook "The Elements Beyond Uranium" , Seaborg, Loveland, 1990. I am always looking for connections.

> > >

> > >

> > > Product details

> > > • ASIN : B07PMZQNNT

> > > • Publication date : March 16, 2019

> > > • Language : English

> > > • File size : 1382 KB

> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > • Screen Reader : Supported

> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled

> > > • Print length : 61 pages

> > > • Lending : Enabled

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > #12-8, 21st published book

> > >

> > > World's First Proofs of Mathematics Oldest Unsolved Problems: No Odd Perfect and Finiteness of Perfect Numbers // Math proof series, book 8 Kindle Edition

> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > >

> > > Last revision was 26Apr2021. And this is AP's 21st published book.

> > >

> > > Preface: Now my history with these proofs goes back to 1991 to 1993, and have been finessing the proofs ever since. Some math proofs just nag nag and nag you. They just cannot be settled still. Their proof is a tiny tiny sliver of impossibility that is easily overlooked. Like an optical illusion that you are mislead into, or like those pictures where you look at it one way and you see a young lady and another way you see a very old lady.

> > >

> > > Now the No Odd Perfect Number is not a important proof in mathematics but mostly a spectacle for it does not teach much beyond making proper correct definitions. And murky definitions is what held a proof of No Odd Perfect, other than 1, held it back. The murky definition of factors, do we include 1 or not include, for example the odd number 9, do we include 3 twice or once for that we have 1* 9 and we have 3*3 and Old Math looked at that as 1 + 3, whereas I would look at that as 1 + 3 + 3. So when you have messy definitions, murky and messy, of course no proof will be found in over 2,000 years.

> > >

> > > Cover Picture: Shows our modern day new reality of the situation where the definition of "perfect" was a Ancient Greek idea, steeped in murky messy idea of factors and when to add factors, that no longer is suitable for mathematics.

> > >

> > > Product details

> > > • ASIN : B07PN1CPRP

> > > • Publication date : March 16, 2019

> > > • Language : English

> > > • File size : 1534 KB

> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled

> > > • Print length : 28 pages

> > > • Lending : Enabled

> > >

> > >

> > > #12-9, 15th published book

> > >

> > > World's First Proofs of Infinitude of Twin-Primes, and Polignac Proved // Math proof series, book 9 Kindle Edition

> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > >

> > > Circa 1991-1993, I gave an Old Math style of proof for the Infinitude of Twin Primes, modeling my proof as to a Euclid Infinitude of Primes Proof. But then came year 2009 when I found the way to make Infinity concept well-defined. Up until 2009, no-one in the world had a clear precise definition or understanding of what "infinity" was or what it means. It means a borderline between finite and infinite and the way to find this borderline is to use the Tractrix when the unit-tractrix area catches up with the area inside a unit circle is the infinity borderline and it happens to be when pi digits have three zeroes in a row, does the tractrix area equal the circle area-- hence, we reached infinity border and beyond are infinite numbers, no longer finite numbers. What that discovery does for proofs of infinitude is change all those proofs dramatically. And here in Twin-Primes and Polignac I show the reader how modern day New Math proves infinitude of any set of numbers.

> > >

> > >

> > > Cover Picture: Is a picture of the first five twin-primes.

> > >

> > > Product details

> > > ASIN : B07PMY1YWB

> > > Publication date : March 15, 2019

> > > Language : English

> > > File size : 1642 KB

> > > Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > Screen Reader : Supported

> > > Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > Word Wise : Not Enabled

> > > Print length : 9 pages

> > > Lending : Enabled

> > >

> > > #12-10, 16th published book

> > >

> > > World's First Proofs of Goldbach, Legendre, Staircase Conjectures// Math proof series, book 10 Kindle Edition

> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > >

> > > AP proved the Goldbach Conjecture starting 1993 where the Algebra Columns is the bedrock-key of the proof involved. The Algebra Column Array is the tool and no-one was going to prove Goldbach unless they had that tool, which the 2014 post of mine makes the array tool crystal clear. So starting 1993, I posted to sci.math about Array or Algebra Column which as a tool would render all proofs of this nature. The Goldbach conjecture historically dates back to 1742, and the Legendre conjecture dates 1752-1833. The Staircase conjecture is a wholly new conjecture proposed by AP circa 2016.

> > >

> > > Cover: Is a Algebra Column Array sequence starting with 6 Array and then 8 Array.

> > >

> > > Product details

> > > • ASIN : B07PS6MR48

> > > • Publication date : March 15, 2019

> > > • Language : English

> > > • File size : 1740 KB

> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > • Screen Reader : Supported

> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled

> > > • Print length : 36 pages

> > > • Lending : Enabled

> > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #148,852 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)

> > > #4 in Number Theory (Kindle Store)

> > > #38 in Number Theory (Books)

> > > #7 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads

> > >

> > >

> > > #12-11, 25th published book

> > >

> > > Disproof of Riemann Hypothesis // Math proof series, book 11 Kindle Edition

> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > >

> > > Last revision was 31Oct2021. This is AP's 25th book of science.

> > >

> > > Preface: The Riemann Hypothesis was a conjecture never able to be proven and for good reason, for it was the last symptom of a rampant disease inside of mathematics. Old Math did not have the true numbers that compose mathematics. Old Math had a rag-tag ugly collection of fake numbers with their Reals, their Negative numbers compounded with Rationals compounded with Irrationals and then adding on the Imaginary. These are fake numbers, when the true numbers of mathematics are the Decimal Grid Numbers. Because Old Math uses fake numbers, is the reason that Riemann Hypothesis just languished, languished and languished. You cannot prove something riddled in fakery. Below I demonstrate why having fake numbers in math, creates fake proofs, fake theorems, and creates a conjecture that can never be proven.

> > >

> > > Cover picture: Riemann Hypothesis deals with fake numbers of mathematics. When what is needed is the true numbers-- Decimal Grid Numbers. We learn Decimal Grid Numbers when very young, when just toddlers, wood counting blocks. All the true numbers of mathematics come from Mathematical Induction-- counting. Mathematical Induction is utterly absent in the Riemann Hypothesis, when it should be central to the hypothesis.

> > >

> > >

> > > Product details

> > > ASIN : B07PVDS1RC

> > > Publication date : March 20, 2019

> > > Language : English

> > > File size : 1475 KB

> > > Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > Screen Reader : Supported

> > > Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > Word Wise : Not Enabled

> > > Print length : 58 pages

> > > Lending : Enabled

> > > Best Sellers Rank: #5,118,638 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

> > > ◦ #643 in Number Theory (Kindle Store)

> > > ◦ #1,398 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads

> > > ◦ #3,559 in Number Theory (Books)

> > >

> > > #12-12, 152nd published book

> > > The 6th Regular Polyhedron-- hexagonal faces at infinity is nonexistent // Math proof series, book 12

> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition

> > > Last revision was 2Aug2022. And this is AP's 152nd published book of science.

> > >

> > > Preface: I started this book in September 2021, and not until July 2022, did I uncover my gross error-- the nonexistence of the 6th Regular Polyhedron. I so much wanted there to be a 6th regular polyhedron and looking in the Internet, the world wide web, are many images of a cell of 7 regular hexagons, a central hexagon surrounded by 6 more regular hexagons tiling a sphere surface. Plenty of these images, but the tipping point for me is the Goldberg polyhedron, here again the cell of 7 regular hexagons tiling a sphere surface. And so, using that 7 cell as supporting evidence of the existence of a 6th Regular Polyhedron, AP proceeds to publish such. Even though I knew of the University of Utah beware caution web page stating that a vertex of 3 regular polygons is an angle of 120 +120+120= 360 degrees and thus laying flat as a plane, no bending, hence no tiling a sphere.

> > >

> > > So I published this book in Sept2021, and not until July2022, needing a coordinate system of points on a sphere for my Ecology book "_Complete Ecology_ with Generalized Faraday Law and revised food chain // Ecology science". That I finally realize my mistake-- Uof U completely correct, and why on Earth did I want to believe Goldberg polyhedron and all those fake geometry images of regular hexagons tiling a sphere surface. This is a massive computer problem of our times, in that it is super easy to make optical illusions in geometry and filling web sites with fake geometry images.

> > >

> > > Well, AP was fooled and fell victim to computer graphics showing where a sphere surface tiling of a central regular hexagon and surrounded by 6 more regular hexagons. There are many pictures and images of a sphere tiling on the Internet of 7 regular hexagons, a central one and surrounded and encircled by 6 more regular hexagons. There is even geometry of what is called Goldberg polyhedron with more pictures and images, all deceptive, all wrong. So this book ends up about the theme of how deceptive computer imaging can be, and not what AP hoped for-- the existence of a regular polyhedra with regular hexagon faces.

> > >

> > > If it were true that a cell of 7 regular polygons has a bend to it, so that it can eventually circle around a sphere surface, then my first publication of this book would have been true. But instead, the truth is the nonexistence of the 6th Regular Polyhedron.

> > >

> > >

> > > Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of a soccer ball of 20 hexagons, 12 pentagons; and a glass ball covered by netting of tiny hexagons. Both objects I use in experiments of trying to proveÂ the 6th Regular Polyhedron only it is nonexistent as I eventually found in July 2022.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Product details

> > > • ASIN : B09K4PWKVK

> > > • Publication date : October 21, 2021

> > > • Language : English

> > > • File size : 853 KB

> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > • Screen Reader : Supported

> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > • Word Wise : Enabled

> > > • Print length : 91 pages

On Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 1:40:39 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

> "Kim Jong Un's lackey" autistically melts

> down completely:

>"mindless fuckdog"

Kibo defiling of The Pope, AP and many others as paid for stalker, for 30 years now.

>

> On Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 1:40:39 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

> > "Kim Jong Un's lackey" autistically melts

> > down completely:

> >"mindless fuckdog"

> > On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 9:27:18 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

> > > Blowfly of Math and Screwfly of Physics

> > >"necrophile"

> > >"Pope Arky the Last"

> > > Merrick Garland,Pres.Biden please check if it is legal for the US govt (CIA or NSF etc) to pay stalkers like Kibo Parry M-V to stalk US citizens for 30 years non-stop, pestering, harassing citizens in sci.math, sci.physics Kibo's necrophilia stalking 2022, Kibo's hatred of Pope, and Kibo's "you need more punishment" stalks

> > >

> > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> > > by Michael Moroney Jul 7, 2022, 8:30:12 AM

> > >

> > >

> > > On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 11:16:31 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

> > > >"Pope of the Cult of Failure"

> > >

> > >

> > > Apparently Kibo Parry Moroney along with a few of his friends-- Zelos Malum, Chris Thomasson were caught forging "I want to fuck her corpse" forging that into AP's posts, when only AP gave condolences. And this forgery of necrophilia caused the "governors of Usenet" to fire Zelos Malum and cause Kibo Parry to search for a new name to continue to stalk and defile Usenet.

> > >

> > > The forgery of AP text in September 2022 with necrophilia by Zelos Malum cost him his job, and appears to have cost Kibo having to discontinue with his fake name of Michael Moroney. And seems to have cost Chris Thomasson a month or two suspension in posting.

> > >

> > > But the defiling of the character AP by Kibo Parry M-Volney continues as it has been from 1993 onwards. But now Kibo is defiling the Pope, in addition. And my recommendation is either Kibo go to jail or have regular psychiatric treatment. For I have never seen a Kibo post that is congratulatory of anyone, only despicable hatred. Why Kibo probably hates his own mother.

> > >

> > >

> > > On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 9:28:57 AM UTC-6, Volney wrote:

> > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> > > by Volney Feb 24, 2023, 11:28:40 PM

> > >

> > >

> > > On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 9:28:07 PM UTC-6, Volney wrote:

> > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> > > > "self diagnosed as insane"

> > >

> > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> > > by Volney Mar 31, 2023, 1:45:31 AM

> > >

> > >

> > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> > > by Volney Apr 15, 2023, 2:39:21 AM

> > >

> > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> > > by Volney May 5, 2023, 9:43:31 PM

> > >

> > >

> > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> > > by Volney May 9, 2023, 10:57:43 PM

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 11:53:19 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

> > > >attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you

> > >

> > >

> > > On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 1:48:04 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

> > > >attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 11:27:58 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

> > > >attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Merrick Garland, Pres.Biden allows Kibo Parry (Volney) to defile the Pope and AP, with his 30 year nonstop hatred. I bet it is against the law for the govt in CIA or NSF to pay for hatred stalker like Kibo. Govt money to pay to stalkers..

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Mr. Garland & Biden, I suspect the US Constitution never allows for a government (agency) to pay for the stalking and pestering and harassment of a US citizen in Usenet sci.math, sci.physics, such as the 30 year nonstop stalker Kibo Parry with his necrophilia forgery and character defiling, even defiling the Pope.

> > >

> > > Kibo in CIA

> > > Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---

> > > Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster

> > > >> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:

> > > > >

> > >

> Kibo> I want to fuck her corpseUniv DaytonElizabeth Smith,Todd B.Smith,Ivan Sudakow,Perry Yaney

>

> > Kibo Parry's nymshifter Moroney-Volney open hate line of 30 year nonstop stalking hate spew

> > On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 3:14:40 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney (open hate line by James Kibo Parry 30 year paid stalker) wrote:

> > >"Drag Queen of Science"

> > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > >

> > > Not again!

> > >

> > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > >

> > > You already said that.

> > >

> > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > >

> > > You're really sick, Pluto!

> > >

> > > wanting to fuck her corpse

> > >

> > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > >

> > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > Todd B. Smith

> > > Univ. Dayton Physics dept.

> > >

> > > Rex L. Berney

> > > Bob Brecha

> > > Bruce Craver

> > > John Erdei

> > > Thomas P. Graham

> > > Donald Hirst

> > > Jenn Hyland

> > > Jay Mathews

> > > Robert Merithew

> > > Brendon Mikula

> > > George K. Miner

> > > J. Michael O'Hare

> > > Leno M Pedrotti

> > > William N. Plick

> > > Randall Schaurer

> > > Elizabeth Smith

> > > Ivan Sudakow

> > > Perry Yaney

> > wiki, wiki Revision history of " James Kibo Parry Moroney"

> > www.exampleproblems dot com wiki

> > (cur | prev) 03:21, 13 March 2021 Todd (talk | contribs ... (10,274 bytes)

> > ep@toddbsmith dot com

> >

> Kibo> I want to fuck her corpseNSF Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Dorothy E Aronson,Dr.Panchanathan,F. Fleming Crim, Brian Stone, James S Olvestad

>

> Kibo Parry's nymshifter Moroney-Volney open hate line of 30 year nonstop stalking

> On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 3:14:40 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney (open hate line by James Kibo Parry 30 year paid stalker) wrote:

> >"Drag Queen of Science"

> > I want to fuck her corpse

> >

> > Not again!

> >

> > I want to fuck her corpse

> >

> > You already said that.

> >

> > I want to fuck her corpse

> >

> > You're really sick, Pluto!

> >

> > wanting to fuck her corpse

> >

> > I want to fuck her corpse

> >

> > I want to fuck her corpse

>

>

> ---quoting Wikipedia ---

> Controversy

> Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."

> --- end quote ---

>

> NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

>

> Dr. Panchanathan , present day

> NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Olvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley

> France Anne Cordova

> Subra Suresh

> Arden Lee Bement Jr.

> Rita R. Colwell

> Neal Francis Lane

> John Howard Gibbons 1993

>

> Barry Shein, kibo parry std world

> Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua

>

>

>

> >

> > > > > > On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 12:14:29 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:

> > > > > > >"certifiably insane"

> > > > > > > Necrophile

> > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > You already said that.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > wanting to fuck her corpse

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > > > >

> > > On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:

> > > > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.

> > > > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.

> > > Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:

> > > > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass

> > > > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

> > > Or did Kibo Parry M. fail out of Rensselaer Polytech for he is brain dead in geometry, cannot see nor understand a slant cut of cylinder is a ellipse, but never a cone.

> > > > Oh you need to see the ellipse-is-a-conic-section proof again? Here you go!

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Some preliminaries:

> > > >

> > > > Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used

> > > > in the proof:

> > > >

> > > > ^ x

> > > > |

> > > > -+- <= x=h

> > > > .' | `.

> > > > . | .

> > > > | | |

> > > > ' | '

> > > > `. | .'

> > > > y <----------+ <= x=0

> > > >

> > > > Cone (side view):

> > > > .

> > > > /|\

> > > > / | \

> > > > /b | \

> > > > /---+---' <= x = h

> > > > / |' \

> > > > / ' | \

> > > > / ' | \

> > > > x = 0 => '-------+-------\

> > > > / a | \

> > > >

> > > > Proof:

> > > >

> > > > r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence

> > > >

> > > > y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.

> > > >

> > > > Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1 ...equation of an ellipse

> > > >

> > > > qed

> > > >

> >

>

>

>

> >

> > Re: fuckdog boston's Kibo Parry Moroney subhuman *stalkers* Betsy DeVos, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, barry shein's world std paying how much to stalk AP? Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, ,,,,

> > by Hewitt Buettner

> >

> >

> > Re: Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, kill// Dan Christensen, Uncle Al, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, Dept Educ Betsy DeVos, John Baez, Port563 Gilbert Strang, Barry Shein

> > by Hewitt Buettner

> >

> > Re: ...although Kibo _universally regarded_ as having more physics intelligence in his shit streaked underwear than in the entire brain of Todd B Smith - Earle Jones's Stanford's math and physics dept combined

> > by Adolpho the Sarcastic Rooftop Monkey

> > Apr 10, 2021, 3:20:20 PM

> >

> > Re: fuckdog boston's Kibo Parry Moroney subhuman *stalkers* Betsy DeVos, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, barry shein's world std paying how much to stalk AP? Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, ,,,,

> > by Hewitt Buettner

> >

> > Oct 10, 2020, 2:55:48 PM

> >

> > Re: Spamming fuckdog Kibo Parry Moroney says fire Stanford's Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian rather than let them brainwash o

> > by

> > Richard Cranium

> >

> > Jan 24, 2021, 3:01:28 PM

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: 1Kibo Parry Moroney says Analbuttfuckmanure MIT, William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter...

> > by Hoofington P. McSnort Aug 26, 2020, 6:58:48 PM

> >

> > Re: Kibo Parry M on Cynthia Barnhart and why MIT is a propaganda camp not a school of higher education.

> > by Michael Moroney Jun 27, 2021, 3:49 PM

> >

> >

> > Moroney says autism // Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins//never realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole

> > 3/4/18

> > By Michael Moroney

> >

> >

> > Re: Autism..says Moroney //Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner//realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole

> > by

> > Michael Moroney Feb 26, 2018, 11:29:08 PM

> >

> > Re: Vincent Meunier,Donald Schwendeman, Rensselaer Polytechnic, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek,kibo Moroney Parry is the reason RPI failed ellipse is like Kibo fails with 938 is 12% short of 945

> > by Allen Walker Apr 13, 2019, 2:04:32 PM

> >

> >

> > Cornell a sicko school? Re: Cornell Univ like Christensen, an education parasite //with their 3 OR 2= 5 while their 3 AND 2 = 1, embracing the contradiction Either..Or..Or..Both

> > by Michael Moroney Jan 18, 2019, 4:59:49 PM

> >

> > Re: Drs.Benedict Gross, Joseph Harris of Harvard, are you as dumb as Moroney never realizing the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV,monopole=.5MeV // 12 proofs below

> > by Michael Moroney Jan 2, 2018, 11:15:07 AM

> >

> > Re: Drs.Hugh Woodin,Horng-Tzer Yau of Harvard, never a Picture of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus//are you as dumb as Moroney//your students deserve better

> > by Michael Moroney Dec 29, 2017, 9:04:44 AM

> >

> > Re: chemistry cannot exist with electron 0.5 to 938 MeV Re: Drs.Thomas Rosenbaum John Schwarz Kip Thorne of CalTech/never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, 0.5MeV = Dirac monopole

> > by Michael Moroney Jan 25, 2018, 11:36:09 AM

> >

> >

> > Re: Drs.David Cobden Victor Cook John Cramer of Univ Wash. are you as dumb as Jeff Relf, _...@__.__//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = monopole

> > by Michael Moroney Jan 14, 2018, 3:19:12 PM

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney on failed physicist Steven Weinberg who cannot entertain the question of which is the real electron of atoms-- is it the muon or the 0.5MeV particle?

> > by Michael Moroney May 29, 2021, 9:02:21 AM

> >

> >

> > Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work

> > by Michael Moroney Oct 28, 2017, 11:55:50 PM

> >

> > Re: the most stupid poster of logic in sci.math for decade-- Dan Christensen, that insane Canadian stalker

> > by Michael Moroney Dec 24, 2017, 1:15:41 AM

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: Jeff Relf, Seattle offtopic shithead spammer says Democrats value tortured South Korean Moon Bears at trillions of dollars, while Republicans rather have rats than Moon Bears

> > By Michael Moroney May 10, 2021

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: South Korea frees Moon Bears, due to Ayaz apology. Glory to God Almighty, South Korea finally freeing their tortured Moon Bears

> > I happened to see a video of a moon bear that was freed from a bile farm (in Vietnam). Nice to see,

> > By Michael Moroney May 9, 2021, 9:48 PM

> >

> >

> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney pink slips Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall, Lene Hau,Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe //cannot tell apart muon = real electron and 0.5MeV Dirac monopole...

> > by Eldridge Art Carpenter Apr 2, 2021, 6:24 AM

> >

> >

> > Re: fuckdog boston's Kibo Parry Moroney subhuman *stalkers* Betsy DeVos, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, barry shein's world std paying how much to stalk AP? Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, ,,,,

> > by Hewitt Buettner

> >

> >

> > Re: Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, kill// Dan Christensen, Uncle Al, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, Dept Educ Betsy DeVos, John Baez, Port563 Gilbert Strang, Barry Shein

> > by Hewitt Buettner

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: 1---Kibo Parry Moroney asks, did we ally ourselves correctly in Korea, for it is South Korea that is behaving like a savage evil barbarians to Moon Bears

> > by Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck

> >

> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says// Dr. Lawrence Bacow, can Harvard stop the Kibo Parry Moroney from his constant insane drumbeat of .... "I ate my brain" ... flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> > by Fred Glover

> >

> > Re: Spamming fuckdog Kibo Parry Moroney says fire Stanford's Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian rather than let them brainwash

> > by Richard Cranium Jan 24, 2021, 3:01:28 PM

> >

> > Re: Moon Bear contents of Samsung and Hyundai? Is it true kibo Parry Moroney & Nicholas Thompson are investigating how much tortured moon-bear parts are installed in Samsung & Hyundai equipment??

> > by Herp Derpington

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says "Oh Mum! Ride-A-Penis Cult!" Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne, CalTech's Thomas Rosenbaum with their 10 OR 6 = 16; their ellipse a conic when it never was; their proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth it is 840 to..

> > by Eddie "Fish Basket" Reynolds Jr.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Drs. Block, Dr. Block, Griffiths, Miller, Suzuki, Lewontin, Gelbart with their meiosis going from 46 to 92, wanting to get to 23; as failures of math and "nude sluts". Is it any worse than Kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945?

> > by Professor Wordsmith

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney paid stalker, NSF Betsy DeVos dept of educ says fails at science Drs. Block, Griffiths, Miller, Suzuki, Lewontin, Gelbart with their meiosis going from 46 to 92, wanting to get to 23; as failures of math "Mouse Dimple Cunt Hair"...

> > by Herp Derpington

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test

> > By Michael Moroney 37 posts 427 views updated 2:04 PM

> >

> >

> > Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole

> > 1/23/18

> > By Michael Moroney

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: unpaid AP doing the world's finest logic, while Cambridge, Stanford, Harvard, Yale, Princeton teach dunce Logic

> > 10/28/17

> > By Michael Moroney

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: MIT's Dr.Martin Bazant, Harvard's Dr.Dennis Gaitsgory-- time you take your full responsibilities as science educator and deal with science failures Michael Moroney

> > 8 posts by 2 authors

> > 12/4/17

> > By Michael Moroney

> >

> >

> >

> > Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole

> > 20 posts by 3 authors

> > By Michael Moroney

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: 8Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS

> > 20 posts by 2 authors

> > 4/9/18

> > By Michael Moroney

> >

> >

> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Lisa Randall, John Baez, abject failures of Math, and supposedly physics with their ignorance of angular momentum because no hydrogen atom can form from proton=938MeV & electron = 0.5MeV

> > By Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck

> >

> >

> > Re: time to bounce the CHURNING sam wormley out of sci.physics

> > By Michael Moroney 6 posts 31 views updated 4:36 PM

> >

> >

> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says of Conde Nast's Nicholas Thompson, he cannot do percentages like Kibo Parry Moroney, so what is kibo Parry Moroney even doing here in sci.math or sci.physics??

> > by Budd Hakken

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney calls his own mother a "pandemic shit mule" but says that President of South Korea will save Moon Bears

> > by Roger Davis

> >

> >

> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney asks Trump to give South Korea to North Korea, for who wants to protect barbarians that torture Moon Bears in cages

> > by Roger Davis

> >

> >

> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney talking to President Moon Jae-In about torturing Moon Bears in South Korea

> > by Irwin Houser

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says boycott South Korea's Hyundai UNTIL they stop torturing MOON BEARS

> > Kibo, is the flat screen composed of 12% tortured Moon Bear bile by Samsung? Kibo, is 12% of the

> > 2:15 AM

> > by Buck Futter

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole

> > AP's diary in 2020 lockdown and social-distancing // sociology series, book 2 Kindle Edition by

> > 2:07 AM

> > by Michael Moroney

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: 3-Nicholas Thompson, Wired magazine// Kibo Parry Moroney, stalker sickfuck gets published in Wired for his 938 is 12% short of 945, Yoo, Nick, why not publish Lisa Randall with her 938MeV proton, 0.5MeV electron which a hydrogen atom ceases to exist

> > Investigating Solid State Engineering versus Mechanical Simple Machine Engineering and AI-robots//

> > 2:02 AM

> > by Bret Alva

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: Autism..says Moroney //Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner//realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole

> > How 6 legged insects evolved//How bird wings evolved// Wing experiment// evolution series, book 2

> > 1:55 AM

> > by Michael Moroney

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: 7Barry Shein's Moroney's world std stalker's hideout-- why Daniel Freedman, Michel Goemans, Vadim Gorin, Harvey Greenspan, flunked calculus & angular momentum never realizing Real proton has to be 840MeV

> > The AP- Linnaeus Classification of Biology-- Using Physics instead of wishy-washy characteristics//

> > 1:52 AM

> > by Michael Moroney

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Lisa Randall, John Baez, abject failures of Math, and supposedly physics with their ignorance of angular momentum because no hydrogen atom can form from proton=938MeV & electron = 0.5MeV

> > Physics Superdeterminism replaces Darwin Evolution // biophysics series, book 1 Kindle Edition by

> > 1:47 AM

> > by Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: Barry Shein, instead of being cornholed by Kibo Parry Moroney, why not try mounting the Kibo and spraying some semen into his bottom and hopefully can cure his stalking, and make sci.physics a better place// tired of this 27 year stalking

> > By Richard Cranium 2 posts 4 views updated

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: I am sure Murray can do a percentage correctly, never Archie Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test

> > Fusion Barrier Principle // Energy series, book 1 Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) I

> > 1:37 AM

> > by Michael Moroney

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: MIT's Dr.Martin Bazant, Harvard's Dr.Dennis Gaitsgory-- time you take your full responsibilities as science educator and deal with science failures Michael Moroney

> > World's First Proof of Kepler Packing Problem KPP // Math proof series, book 3 Kindle Edition by

> > 1:30 AM

> > by Michael Moroney

> > On Wednesday, August 10, 2022 at 8:32:10 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:

> > > On Wednesday, August 10, 2022 at 3:07:22 AM UTC-4, Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse) wrote:

> > > > STUDENTS BEWARE...

> > >

> > > [snip Jan Burse's... truth and fount of wisdom

> > >

> > Todd B. Smith

> > > Univ. Dayton Physics dept.

> > >

> > > Rex L. Berney

> > > Bob Brecha

> > > Bruce Craver

> > > John Erdei

> > > Thomas P. Graham

> > > Donald Hirst

> > > Jenn Hyland

> > > Jay Mathews

> > > Robert Merithew

> > > Brendon Mikula

> > > George K. Miner

> > > J. Michael O'Hare

> > > Leno M Pedrotti

> > > William N. Plick

> > > Randall Schaurer

> > > Elizabeth Smith

> > > Ivan Sudakow

> > > Perry Yaney

> > wiki, wiki Revision history of " James Kibo Parry Moroney"

> > www.exampleproblems dot com wiki

> > (cur | prev) 03:21, 13 March 2021 Todd (talk | contribs ... (10,274 bytes)

> > ep@toddbsmith dot com

> >

> > ---quoting Wikipedia ---

> > Controversy

> > Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."

> > --- end quote ---

> >

> > NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

> >

> > Dr. Panchanathan , present day

> > NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Olvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley

> > France Anne Cordova

> > Subra Suresh

> > Arden Lee Bement Jr.

> > Rita R. Colwell

> > Neal Francis Lane

> > John Howard Gibbons 1993

> >

> > Barry Shein, kibo parry std world

> > Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua

> >

> >

> >

> > > "I want to fuck her corpse" sci.math--Sergio,Susanne Schneider,Metin Tolan,Anja Karliczek,Susanne Schneider,Steffen Schumann, Cynthia A. Volkert are they forever going to be mindless idiots of math--slant cut of cone is oval, never ellipse geometry.

> > >

> > > On Friday, June 11, 2021 at 12:00:31 AM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:

> > > > Enjoy!

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > WM

> > > , …

> > > Sergi o

> > > 628

> > >

> > > unread,

> > > Question on Hilbert's Hotel.

> > > On 1/17/2023 3:48 AM, WM wrote: > Ben Bacarisse schrieb am Dienstag, 17. Januar 2023 um 01:37:46

> > > 10:19 PM

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > WM

> > > , …

> > > Ben Bacarisse

> > > 46

> > >

> > > unread,

> > > Equal Rights!

> > > "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.t...@gmail.com> writes: > 2 is missing

> > > 9:33 PM

> > >

> > >

> > > > > > > On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 12:14:29 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:

> > > > > > > >"certifiably insane"

> > > > > > > > Necrophile

> > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > You already said that.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > wanting to fuck her corpse

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > > > > >

> > > > On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:

> > > > > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.

> > > > > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.

> > > > Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:

> > > > > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass

> > > > > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

> > > > Or did Kibo Parry M. fail out of Rensselaer Polytech for he is brain dead in geometry, cannot see nor understand a slant cut of cylinder is a ellipse, but never a cone.

> > > > > Oh you need to see the ellipse-is-a-conic-section proof again? Here you go!

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Some preliminaries:

> > > > >

> > > > > Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used

> > > > > in the proof:

> > > > >

> > > > > ^ x

> > > > > |

> > > > > -+- <= x=h

> > > > > .' | `.

> > > > > . | .

> > > > > | | |

> > > > > ' | '

> > > > > `. | .'

> > > > > y <----------+ <= x=0

> > > > >

> > > > > Cone (side view):

> > > > > .

> > > > > /|\

> > > > > / | \

> > > > > /b | \

> > > > > /---+---' <= x = h

> > > > > / |' \

> > > > > / ' | \

> > > > > / ' | \

> > > > > x = 0 => '-------+-------\

> > > > > / a | \

> > > > >

> > > > > Proof:

> > > > >

> > > > > r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence

> > > > >

> > > > > y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.

> > > > >

> > > > > Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1 ...equation of an ellipse

> > > > >

> > > > > qed

> > > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 2:58:49 PM UTC-5, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

> > > > On 9/29/2022 10:19 PM, Michael Moroney wrote:

> > > > >"antiscience"

> > > >> I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > >

> > > > > Once again, it looks like I triggered another autism meltdown by

> > > >is into necrophilia... Wow! Talk about learning

> > > > something new everyday! ;^o

> > > 3rd published book

> > >

> > > AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition

> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > > Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

> > >

> > > Product details

> > > • ASIN : B07PLSDQWC

> > > • Publication date : March 11, 2019

> > > • Language : English

> > > • File size : 1621 KB

> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled

> > > • Print length : 20 pages

> > > • Lending : Enabled

> > > •

> > > •

> > >

> > > Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition

> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > > Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.

> > >

> > > Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.

> > >

> > > In the course of 2019 through 2022, I have had to explain this proof often on Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics. And one thing that constant explaining does for a mind of science, is reduce the proof to its stripped down minimum format, to bare bones skeleton proof. I can prove the slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse in just a one sentence proof. Proof-- A single cone and oval have just one axis of symmetry, while a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, hence slant cut is always a oval, never the ellipse.

> > >

> > > Product details

> > > • ASIN : B081TWQ1G6

> > > • Publication date : November 21, 2019

> > > • Language : English

> > > • File size : 827 KB

> > > • Simultaneous device usage : Unlimited

> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > • Screen Reader : Supported

> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled

> > > • Print length : 51 pages

> > > • Lending : Enabled

> > > #12-2, 11th published book

> > >

> > > World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition

> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > > Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.

> > > Preface:

> > > Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

> > >

> > > Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.

> > >

> > > To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

> > >

> > > Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

> > >

> > >

> > > Product details

> > > ASIN : B07PQTNHMY

> > > Publication date : March 14, 2019

> > > Language : English

> > > File size : 1309 KB

> > > Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > Screen Reader : Supported

> > > Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > Word Wise : Not Enabled

> > > Print length : 154 pages

> > > Lending : Enabled

> > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)

> > > #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

> > > #134 in Calculus (Books)

> > > #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

> > > #12-3, 24th published book

> > >

> > >

> > > World's First Proof of Kepler Packing Problem KPP // Math proof series, book 3 Kindle Edition

> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > >

> > > There has been a alleged proof of KPP by Thomas Hales, but his is a fakery because he does not define what infinity actually means, for it means a borderline between finite and infinite numbers. Thus, KPP was never going to be proven until a well-defined infinity borderline was addressed within the proof. And because infinity has a borderline means that in free space with no borderlines to tackle and contend with, the 12 kissing point density that is the hexagonal close packed is the maximum density. But the truth and reality of Kepler Packing is asking for maximum packing out to infinity. That means you have to contend and fight with the packing of identical spheres up against a wall or border. And so, in tackling that wall, we can shift the hexagonal closed pack to another type of packing, a hybrid type of packing in order to get "maximum packing". So no proof ever of KPP is going to happen unless the proof tackles a infinity border wall. In free-space, a far distance away from a wall barrier of infinity border, then, hexagonal closed pack reigns and is the packing in all of free space-- but, the moment the packing gets nearby the walls of infinity border, then, we re-arrange the hexagonal closed pack to fit in more spheres. Not unlike us packing a suitcase and then rearranging to fit in more.

> > >

> > > Cover picture: is a container and so the closed packing must be modified once the border is nearly reached to maximize the number of spheres.

> > >

> > > Product details

> > > • ASIN : B07NMV8NQQ

> > > • Publication date : March 20, 2019

> > > • Language : English

> > > • File size : 1241 KB

> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > • Screen Reader : Supported

> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled

> > > • Print length : 60 pages

> > > • Lending : Enabled

> > >

> > > #12-4, 28th published book

> > >

> > > World's First Valid Proof of 4 Color Mapping Problem// Math proof series, book 4 Kindle Edition

> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > >

> > > Now in the math literature it is alleged that Appel & Haken proved this conjecture that 4 colors are sufficient to color all planar maps such that no two adjacent countries have the same color. Appel & Haken's fake proof was a computer proof and it is fake because their method is Indirect Nonexistence method. Unfortunately in the time of Appel & Haken few in mathematics had a firm grip on true Logic, where they did not even know that Boole's logic is fakery with his 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = 1, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 depending on which is subtracted. But the grave error in logic of Appel & Haken is their use of a utterly fake method of proof-- indirect nonexistence (see my textbook on Reductio Ad Absurdum). Wiles with his alleged proof of Fermat's Last Theorem is another indirect nonexistence as well as Hales's fake proof of Kepler Packing is indirect nonexistence.

> > > Appel & Haken were in a time period when computers used in mathematics was a novelty, and instead of focusing on whether their proof was sound, everyone was dazzled not with the logic argument but the fact of using computers to generate a proof. And of course big big money was attached to this event and so, math is stuck with a fake proof of 4-Color-Mapping. And so, AP starting in around 1993, eventually gives the World's first valid proof of 4-Color-Mapping. Sorry, no computer fanfare, but just strict logical and sound argument.

> > >

> > > Cover picture: Shows four countries colored yellow, red, green, purple and all four are mutually adjacent. And where the Purple colored country is landlocked, so that if it were considered that a 5th color is needed, that 5th color should be purple, hence, 4 colors are sufficient.

> > >

> > > Product details

> > > ASIN : B07PZ2Y5RV

> > > Publication date : March 23, 2019

> > > Language : English

> > > File size : 1183 KB

> > > Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > Screen Reader : Supported

> > > Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > Word Wise : Not Enabled

> > > Print length : 34 pages

> > > Lending : Enabled

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > #12-5, 6th published book

> > >

> > > World's First Valid Proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem, 1993 & 2014 // Math proof series, book 5 Kindle Edition

> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

> > >

> > > Last revision was 29Apr2021. This is AP's 6th published book.

> > >

> > > Preface: Truthful proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem// including the fake Euler proof in exp3 and Wiles fake proof.

> > >

> > > Recap summary: In 1993 I proved Fermat's Last Theorem with a pure algebra proof, arguing that because of the special number 4 where 2 + 2 = 2^2 = 2*2 = 4 that this special feature of a unique number 4, allows for there to exist solutions to A^2 + B^2 = C^2. That the number 4 is a basis vector allowing more solutions to exist in exponent 2. But since there is no number with N+N+N = N*N*N that exists, there cannot be a solution in exp3 and the same argument for higher exponents. In 2014, I went and proved Generalized FLT by using "condensed rectangles". Once I had proven Generalized, then Regular FLT comes out of that proof as a simple corollary. So I had two proofs of Regular FLT, pure algebra and a corollary from Generalized FLT. Then recently in 2019, I sought to find a pure algebra proof of Generalized FLT, and I believe I accomplished that also by showing solutions to Generalized FLT also come from the special number 4 where 2 + 2 = 2^2 = 2*2 = 4. Amazing how so much math comes from the specialness of 4, where I argue that a Vector Space of multiplication provides the Generalized FLT of A^x + B^y = C^z.

> > >

> > > Cover Picture: In my own handwriting, some Generalized Fermat's Last Theorem type of equations.

> > >

> > > As for the Euler exponent 3 invalid proof and the Wiles invalid FLT, both are missing a proof of the case of all three A,B,C are evens (see in the text).

> > >

> > > Product details

> > > • ASIN : B07PQKGW4M

> > > • Publication date : March 12, 2019

> > > • Language : English

> > > • File size : 1503 KB

> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > • Screen Reader : Supported

> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled

> > > • Print length : 156 pages

> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,327,817 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

> > > ◦ #589 in Number Theory (Kindle Store)

> > > ◦ #3,085 in Number Theory (Books)

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > #12-6, 19th published book

> > >

> > > World's First Proof of Collatz Conjecture// Math proof series, book 6 Kindle Edition

> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > >

> > > Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 19th published book.

> > >

> > > Preface: Old Math's Collatz conjecture, 1937, was this: If you land on an even number, you divide by 2 until you come to an odd number. If you come to or land on an odd number, you do a 3N+1 then proceed further. The conjecture then says that no matter what number you start with, it ends up being 1.

> > >

> > > What the Collatz proof of math tells us, is that so very often mathematicians pose a conjecture in which their initial formulation of the conjecture is murky, obfuscation and poorly designed statement. Such poorly designed statements can never be proven true or false. An example that comes to mind of another poorly designed conjecture is the No Odd Perfect Conjecture, in which the statement is obfuscation of factors. So for the odd number 9, is it 1+3, or is it 1+ 3 + 3. So when a mathematics conjecture is full of obfuscation and error in the statement, then these type of conjectures never have a proof. And takes a person with a logical mind to fix and straighten out the conjecture statement and then provide a proof, thereof.

> > >

> > > A return to my Collatz proof in 2022, allowed me a second proof of Collatz with only 3N+1, in a mathematical induction proof, using the Decimal Grid System of Numbers. The true numbers of mathematics are the Decimal Grid System Numbers and this allows a Collatz proof of stand alone 3N+1.

> > >

> > > Cover picture: when I think of Collatz, I think of a slide, a slide down and so my French curve is the best slide I can think of, other than a slide-ruler, but a slide ruler is slide across.

> > >

> > >

> > > Product details

> > > • ASIN : B07PS98K5H

> > > • Publication date : March 16, 2019

> > > • Language : English

> > > • File size : 1990 KB

> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > • Screen Reader : Supported

> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled

> > > • Print length : 113 pages

> > > • Lending : Enabled

> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #212,131 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

> > > ◦ #4 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

> > > ◦ #9 in Number Theory (Kindle Store)

> > > ◦ #32 in Number Theory (Books)

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > #12-7, 20th published book

> > > World's First Proofs that No Perfect Cuboid Exists// Math proof series, book 7 Kindle Edition

> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > >

> > > Someone on the Internet posed the unproven No Perfect Cuboid, and so I took up the challenge. I am usually a sucker for geometry riddles, more so than number theory. So I obliged. Then by 2014 I proved the matter and looking back at it now in 2019, I really really do not see what all the fuss was about-- that it was not that hard not hard at all. You just have to look carefully at sets of 4 right triangles and find an Impossibility Construction, why you cannot have those 4 right triangles all with positive integer numbers for their 3 sides. But the proof method is so hugely important in math-- impossibility of construction. And, please, do not confuse that method with Reductio Ad Absurdum, for RAA is not a valid proof method in mathematics (see my logic book on RAA). But, the method of Impossible Construction, although it might look like RAA, is totally different and fully valid in all aspects.

> > >

> > > But now, in hindsight in March 2019, writing this up, I see a very close connection of No Perfect Cuboid to that of Generalized Fermat's Last Theorem with its equation of A^x + B^y = C^z and the way I proved Generalized FLT was with "condensed rectangles" and the No Perfect Cuboid is a 3rd Dimension object but it is 4 rectangles of 4 right triangles we inspect. And we can pursue that connection between Generalized FLT and No Perfect Cuboid further, but not now.

> > >

> > > Cover Picture: Is that of 4 rectangular boxes, 2 of which are cubes sitting atop a book page of the Cubic Set for the Transuranium Atoms, from the textbook "The Elements Beyond Uranium" , Seaborg, Loveland, 1990. I am always looking for connections.

> > >

> > >

> > > Product details

> > > • ASIN : B07PMZQNNT

> > > • Publication date : March 16, 2019

> > > • Language : English

> > > • File size : 1382 KB

> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > • Screen Reader : Supported

> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled

> > > • Print length : 61 pages

> > > • Lending : Enabled

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > #12-8, 21st published book

> > >

> > > World's First Proofs of Mathematics Oldest Unsolved Problems: No Odd Perfect and Finiteness of Perfect Numbers // Math proof series, book 8 Kindle Edition

> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > >

> > > Last revision was 26Apr2021. And this is AP's 21st published book.

> > >

> > > Preface: Now my history with these proofs goes back to 1991 to 1993, and have been finessing the proofs ever since. Some math proofs just nag nag and nag you. They just cannot be settled still. Their proof is a tiny tiny sliver of impossibility that is easily overlooked. Like an optical illusion that you are mislead into, or like those pictures where you look at it one way and you see a young lady and another way you see a very old lady.

> > >

> > > Now the No Odd Perfect Number is not a important proof in mathematics but mostly a spectacle for it does not teach much beyond making proper correct definitions. And murky definitions is what held a proof of No Odd Perfect, other than 1, held it back. The murky definition of factors, do we include 1 or not include, for example the odd number 9, do we include 3 twice or once for that we have 1* 9 and we have 3*3 and Old Math looked at that as 1 + 3, whereas I would look at that as 1 + 3 + 3. So when you have messy definitions, murky and messy, of course no proof will be found in over 2,000 years.

> > >

> > > Cover Picture: Shows our modern day new reality of the situation where the definition of "perfect" was a Ancient Greek idea, steeped in murky messy idea of factors and when to add factors, that no longer is suitable for mathematics.

> > >

> > > Product details

> > > • ASIN : B07PN1CPRP

> > > • Publication date : March 16, 2019

> > > • Language : English

> > > • File size : 1534 KB

> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled

> > > • Print length : 28 pages

> > > • Lending : Enabled

> > >

> > >

> > > #12-9, 15th published book

> > >

> > > World's First Proofs of Infinitude of Twin-Primes, and Polignac Proved // Math proof series, book 9 Kindle Edition

> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > >

> > > Circa 1991-1993, I gave an Old Math style of proof for the Infinitude of Twin Primes, modeling my proof as to a Euclid Infinitude of Primes Proof. But then came year 2009 when I found the way to make Infinity concept well-defined. Up until 2009, no-one in the world had a clear precise definition or understanding of what "infinity" was or what it means. It means a borderline between finite and infinite and the way to find this borderline is to use the Tractrix when the unit-tractrix area catches up with the area inside a unit circle is the infinity borderline and it happens to be when pi digits have three zeroes in a row, does the tractrix area equal the circle area-- hence, we reached infinity border and beyond are infinite numbers, no longer finite numbers. What that discovery does for proofs of infinitude is change all those proofs dramatically. And here in Twin-Primes and Polignac I show the reader how modern day New Math proves infinitude of any set of numbers.

> > >

> > >

> > > Cover Picture: Is a picture of the first five twin-primes.

> > >

> > > Product details

> > > ASIN : B07PMY1YWB

> > > Publication date : March 15, 2019

> > > Language : English

> > > File size : 1642 KB

> > > Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > Screen Reader : Supported

> > > Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > Word Wise : Not Enabled

> > > Print length : 9 pages

> > > Lending : Enabled

> > >

> > > #12-10, 16th published book

> > >

> > > World's First Proofs of Goldbach, Legendre, Staircase Conjectures// Math proof series, book 10 Kindle Edition

> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > >

> > > AP proved the Goldbach Conjecture starting 1993 where the Algebra Columns is the bedrock-key of the proof involved. The Algebra Column Array is the tool and no-one was going to prove Goldbach unless they had that tool, which the 2014 post of mine makes the array tool crystal clear. So starting 1993, I posted to sci.math about Array or Algebra Column which as a tool would render all proofs of this nature. The Goldbach conjecture historically dates back to 1742, and the Legendre conjecture dates 1752-1833. The Staircase conjecture is a wholly new conjecture proposed by AP circa 2016.

> > >

> > > Cover: Is a Algebra Column Array sequence starting with 6 Array and then 8 Array.

> > >

> > > Product details

> > > • ASIN : B07PS6MR48

> > > • Publication date : March 15, 2019

> > > • Language : English

> > > • File size : 1740 KB

> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > • Screen Reader : Supported

> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled

> > > • Print length : 36 pages

> > > • Lending : Enabled

> > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #148,852 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)

> > > #4 in Number Theory (Kindle Store)

> > > #38 in Number Theory (Books)

> > > #7 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads

> > >

> > >

> > > #12-11, 25th published book

> > >

> > > Disproof of Riemann Hypothesis // Math proof series, book 11 Kindle Edition

> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > >

> > > Last revision was 31Oct2021. This is AP's 25th book of science.

> > >

> > > Preface: The Riemann Hypothesis was a conjecture never able to be proven and for good reason, for it was the last symptom of a rampant disease inside of mathematics. Old Math did not have the true numbers that compose mathematics. Old Math had a rag-tag ugly collection of fake numbers with their Reals, their Negative numbers compounded with Rationals compounded with Irrationals and then adding on the Imaginary. These are fake numbers, when the true numbers of mathematics are the Decimal Grid Numbers. Because Old Math uses fake numbers, is the reason that Riemann Hypothesis just languished, languished and languished. You cannot prove something riddled in fakery. Below I demonstrate why having fake numbers in math, creates fake proofs, fake theorems, and creates a conjecture that can never be proven.

> > >

> > > Cover picture: Riemann Hypothesis deals with fake numbers of mathematics. When what is needed is the true numbers-- Decimal Grid Numbers. We learn Decimal Grid Numbers when very young, when just toddlers, wood counting blocks. All the true numbers of mathematics come from Mathematical Induction-- counting. Mathematical Induction is utterly absent in the Riemann Hypothesis, when it should be central to the hypothesis.

> > >

> > >

> > > Product details

> > > ASIN : B07PVDS1RC

> > > Publication date : March 20, 2019

> > > Language : English

> > > File size : 1475 KB

> > > Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > Screen Reader : Supported

> > > Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > Word Wise : Not Enabled

> > > Print length : 58 pages

> > > Lending : Enabled

> > > Best Sellers Rank: #5,118,638 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

> > > ◦ #643 in Number Theory (Kindle Store)

> > > ◦ #1,398 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads

> > > ◦ #3,559 in Number Theory (Books)

> > >

> > > #12-12, 152nd published book

> > > The 6th Regular Polyhedron-- hexagonal faces at infinity is nonexistent // Math proof series, book 12

> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition

> > > Last revision was 2Aug2022. And this is AP's 152nd published book of science.

> > >

> > > Preface: I started this book in September 2021, and not until July 2022, did I uncover my gross error-- the nonexistence of the 6th Regular Polyhedron. I so much wanted there to be a 6th regular polyhedron and looking in the Internet, the world wide web, are many images of a cell of 7 regular hexagons, a central hexagon surrounded by 6 more regular hexagons tiling a sphere surface. Plenty of these images, but the tipping point for me is the Goldberg polyhedron, here again the cell of 7 regular hexagons tiling a sphere surface. And so, using that 7 cell as supporting evidence of the existence of a 6th Regular Polyhedron, AP proceeds to publish such. Even though I knew of the University of Utah beware caution web page stating that a vertex of 3 regular polygons is an angle of 120 +120+120= 360 degrees and thus laying flat as a plane, no bending, hence no tiling a sphere.

> > >

> > > So I published this book in Sept2021, and not until July2022, needing a coordinate system of points on a sphere for my Ecology book "_Complete Ecology_ with Generalized Faraday Law and revised food chain // Ecology science". That I finally realize my mistake-- Uof U completely correct, and why on Earth did I want to believe Goldberg polyhedron and all those fake geometry images of regular hexagons tiling a sphere surface. This is a massive computer problem of our times, in that it is super easy to make optical illusions in geometry and filling web sites with fake geometry images.

> > >

> > > Well, AP was fooled and fell victim to computer graphics showing where a sphere surface tiling of a central regular hexagon and surrounded by 6 more regular hexagons. There are many pictures and images of a sphere tiling on the Internet of 7 regular hexagons, a central one and surrounded and encircled by 6 more regular hexagons. There is even geometry of what is called Goldberg polyhedron with more pictures and images, all deceptive, all wrong. So this book ends up about the theme of how deceptive computer imaging can be, and not what AP hoped for-- the existence of a regular polyhedra with regular hexagon faces.

> > >

> > > If it were true that a cell of 7 regular polygons has a bend to it, so that it can eventually circle around a sphere surface, then my first publication of this book would have been true. But instead, the truth is the nonexistence of the 6th Regular Polyhedron.

> > >

> > >

> > > Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of a soccer ball of 20 hexagons, 12 pentagons; and a glass ball covered by netting of tiny hexagons. Both objects I use in experiments of trying to proveÂ the 6th Regular Polyhedron only it is nonexistent as I eventually found in July 2022.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Product details

> > > • ASIN : B09K4PWKVK

> > > • Publication date : October 21, 2021

> > > • Language : English

> > > • File size : 853 KB

> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > • Screen Reader : Supported

> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > • Word Wise : Enabled

> > > • Print length : 91 pages

Message has been deleted

May 30, 2023, 10:06:04 PMMay 30

to

Bob Brecha,Todd B. Smith Univ Dayton-- why does Kibo continue to defile The Pope? Why can you not stop him, for he has defiled and demonized AP for 30 years nonstop, are you going to let him defile the Pope for 30 years???? And Todd, how is your reading of AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS and TEACHING TRUE MATH textbook series (see below) coming along. I would answer any questions you may have, provided they are serious questions.

Kibo Parry-Moroney-Volney set up a open hate spew line with NSF money backing???

On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 10:51:51 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

>"failure"

> fails at math and science:

>Re: "psychoceramic"

On Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 1:40:39 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

> "Kim Jong Un's lackey" autistically melts

> down completely:

>"mindless fuckdog"

Kibo defiling of The Pope, AP and many others as paid for stalker, for 30 years now.

>

> On Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 1:40:39 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

> > "Kim Jong Un's lackey" autistically melts

> > down completely:

> >"mindless fuckdog"

> > On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 9:27:18 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

> > > Blowfly of Math and Screwfly of Physics

> > >"necrophile"

> > >"Pope Arky the Last"

The time in late 2022 when AP was giving condolences to a special deceased person, yet here comes Kibo with his hate channel gang of stalkers forging necrophila onto AP posts. Forgery that cost a ISP job of one of the forgers and trimmed Kibo's spamm, but not enough. And that Kibo needs to be banned altogether from sci.math and sci.physics, and all his morphed names.

> Kibo> I want to fuck her corpseUniv DaytonElizabeth Smith,Todd B.Smith,Ivan Sudakow,Perry Yaney

>

> > Kibo Parry's nymshifter Moroney-Volney open hate line of 30 year nonstop stalking hate spew

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Archimedes Plutonium

#2-1, My 137th published book

Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

#1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory

This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.

Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.

Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.

And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.

Length: 64 pages

Product details

• File Size : 790 KB

• Publication Date : October 5, 2020

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Print Length : 64 pages

• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Language: : English

• ASIN : B08KS4YGWY

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory

◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)

◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

#2-2, 145th published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2

Product details

• ASIN : B08PC99JJB

• Publication date : November 29, 2020

• Language: : English

• File size : 682 KB

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads

◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)

◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)

#2-3, 146th published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3

Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.

Product details

◦ ASIN : B08RK33T8V

◦ Publication date : December 28, 2020

◦ Language : English

◦ File size : 794 KB

◦ Print length : 124 pages

◦ Best Sellers Rank: #293,315 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #401 in Physics (Kindle Store)

◦ #2,236 in Physics (Books)

#2-4, 151st published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4

Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.

Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.

Product details

• ASIN : B09JW5DVYM

• Publication date : October 19, 2021

• Language : English

• File size : 1048 KB

• Best Sellers Rank: #4,844,838 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #487 in Electromagnetic Theory

◦ #1,210 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)

◦ #8,751 in Electromagnetism (Books)

#2-8, 202nd published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Permanent Colony on Europa// graduate school college

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle edition)

Preface: Crisis emergency times call for textbooks to reflect the times. The Sun gone Red Giant Initiation Phase as measured by NASA in the decade of 2010 to 2020 as showing a 0.005% Solar Radiation yearly increase threatens all life on Earth with extinction and oblivion. This crisis calls for "All Hands On Deck" to solve the problem. And to solve that problem we need all scientists in the work effort of getting Europa, the satellite of Jupiter to be our second home. I see no textbook for college graduate school as appropriate, unless it is a book addressing the crisis itself. Just the opposite of Nero was fiddling while Rome burned; we want All Hands on Deck, to save as much life on Earth as possible.

Cover Picture: Is my iphone photo of a Google search for Europa with Webb telescope. These are exciting times in that the Webb telescope maybe able to pinpoint life on Europa.

Product details

• ASIN : B0BC5T9JBH

• Publication date : August 27, 2022

• Language : English

• File size : 801 KB

• Lending : Enabled

#2-9, 161st published book

PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.

Preface:

A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.

It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.

Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.

Product details

• ASIN : B09N18QPP1

• Publication date : December 3, 2021

• Language : English

• File size : 1139 KB

• Lending : Enabled

#5-1, My 134th published book

Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had already written the series of TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS in a 7 volume, 8 book set. This would be the first book in that 8 book set (one of the books is a companion book to 1st year college). But I suppose that I needed to write the full series before I could write the Introduction and know what I had to talk about and talk about in a logical progression order. Sounds paradoxical in a sense, that I needed to write the full series first and then go back and write the Introduction. But in another sense, hard to write an introduction on something you have not really fully done and completed. For example to know what is error filled Old Math and to list those errors in a logical order requires me to write the full 7 volumes in order to list in order the mistakes.

Cover Picture: Mathematics begins with counting, with numbers, with quantity. But counting numbers needs geometry for something to count in the first place. So here in this picture of the generalized Hydrogen atom of chemistry and physics is a torus geometry of 8 rings of a proton torus and one ring where my fingers are, is a equator ring that is the muon and thrusting through the proton torus at the equator of the torus. So we count 9 rings in all. So math is created by atoms and math numbers exist because atoms have many geometry figures to count. And geometry exists because atoms have shapes and different figures.

Product details

• ASIN : B08K2XQB4M

• Publication date : September 24, 2020

• Language : English

• File size : 576 KB

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #224,974 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #3 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

◦ #23 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

◦ #182 in Calculus (Books)

#5-2, 45th published

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon Kindle edition)

Last revision was 2NOV2020. And this is AP's 45th published book of science.

Preface: Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education.

This is a textbook series in several volumes that carries every person through all his/her math education starting age 5 up to age 26. Volume 2 is for age 5 year old to that of senior in High School, that is needed to do both science and math. Every other math book is incidental to this series of Teaching True Mathematics.

It is a journal-textbook because Amazon's Kindle offers me the ability to edit overnight, and to change the text, almost on a daily basis. A unique first in education textbooks-- almost a continual overnight editing. Adding new text, correcting text. Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education. Volume 3 carries the Freshperson in College for their math calculus education.

Cover Picture: The Numbers as Integers from 0 to 100, and 10 Grid when dividing by 10, and part of the 100 Grid when dividing by 100. Decimal Grid Numbers are the true numbers of mathematics. The Reals, the rationals & irrationals, the algebraic & transcendentals, the imaginary & Complex, and the negative-numbers are all fake numbers. For, to be a true number, you have to "be counted" by mathematical induction. The smallest Grid system is the Decimal 10 Grid.

Product details

ASIN : B07RG7BVZW

Publication date : May 2, 2019

Language : English

File size : 2024 KB

Lending : Enabled

Best Sellers Rank: #235,426 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

#15 in General Geometry

#223 in Geometry & Topology (Books)

#5-3, 55th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 25Jun2021. And this is AP's 55th published book of science.

Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019

Preface: This is volume 3, book 3 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Freshperson students, 1st year college students of age 18-19. It is the continuation of volume 2 for ages 5 through 18 years old.

The main major topic is the AP-EM equations of electricity and magnetism, the mathematics for the laws of electricity and magnetism; what used to be called the Maxwell Equations of Physics. The 1st Year College Math has to prepare all students with the math for all the sciences. So 1st year college Math is like a huge intersection station that has to prepare students with the math they need to do the hard sciences such as physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, geology, etc. What this means is, 1st year college is calculus that allows the student to work with electricity and magnetism. All the math that is needed to enable students to do electricity and magnetism. In Old Math before this textbook, those Old Math textbooks would end in 1/3 of the text about Arclength, vector space, div, curl, Line Integral, Green's, Stokes, Divergence theorem trying to reach and be able to teach Maxwell Equations. But sadly, barely any Old Math classroom reached that 1/3 ending of the textbook, and left all those college students without any math to tackle electricity and magnetism. And most of Old Math was just muddle headed wrong even if they covered the last 1/3 of the textbook. And that is totally unacceptable in science. This textbook fixes that huge hole and gap in Old Math education.

And there is no way around it, that a course in 1st year College Calculus is going to do a lot of hands on experiment with electricity and magnetism, and is required of the students to buy a list of physics apparatus-- multimeter, galvanometer, coil, bar magnet, alligator clip wires, electromagnet, iron filing case, and possibly even a 12 volt transformer, all shown in the cover picture. The beginning of this textbook and the middle section all leads into the ending of this textbook-- we learn the AP-EM Equations and how to use those equations. And there is no escaping the fact that it has to be hands on physics experiments in the classroom of mathematics.

But, do not be scared, for this is all easy easy easy. For if you passed and enjoyed Volume 2 TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, then I promise you, you will not be stressed with Volume 3, for I go out of my way to make it clear and understandable.

Warning: this is a Journal Textbook, meaning that I am constantly adding new material, constantly revising, constantly fixing mistakes or making things more clear. So if you read this book in August of 2019, chances are it is different when you read it in September 2019. Ebooks allow authors the freedom to improve their textbooks on a ongoing basis.

The 1st year college math should be about the math that prepares any and all students for science, whether they branch out into physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, or math, they should have all the math in 1st year college that will carry them through those science studies. I make every attempt possible to make math easy to understand, easy to learn and hopefully fun.

Product details

• ASIN : B07WN9RVXD

• Publication date : August 16, 2019

• Language : English

• File size : 1390 KB

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #1,377,070 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #411 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

◦ #2,480 in Calculus (Books)

#5-4, 56th published book

COLLEGE CALCULUS GUIDE to help students recognize math professor spam from math truth & reality// math textbook series, book 4 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

#1 New Releasein 15-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

This textbook is the companion guide book to AP's Teaching True Mathematics, 1st year College. It is realized that Old Math will take a long time in removing their fake math, so in the interim period, this Guide book is designed to speed up the process of removing fake Calculus out of the education system, the fewer students we punish with forcing them with fake Calculus, the better we are.

Cover Picture: This book is part comedy, for when you cannot reason with math professors that they have many errors to fix, that 90% of their Calculus is in error, you end up resorting to comedy, making fun of them, to prod them to fix their errors. To prod them to "do right by the students of the world" not their entrenched propaganda.

Length: 54 pages

Product details

File Size: 1035 KB

Print Length: 64 pages

Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited

Publication Date: August 18, 2019

Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC

Language: English

ASIN: B07WNGLQ85

Text-to-Speech: Enabled ￼

Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled ￼

Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #253,425 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)

#38 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

#318 in Calculus (Books)

#48 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

#5-5, 72nd published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 4 for age 19-20 Sophomore-year College, math textbook series, book 5 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface: This is volume 4, book 5 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Sophomore-year students, students of age 19-20. It is the continuation of volume 3 in the end-goal of learning how to do the mathematics of electricity and magnetism, because everything in physics is nothing but atoms and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. To know math, you have to know physics. We learned the Calculus of 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. But we did not learn the calculus of those equations for 3rd dimension. So, you can say that Sophomore year College math is devoted to 3D Calculus. This sophomore year college we fill in all the calculus, and we start over on all of Geometry, for geometry needs a modern day revision. And pardon me for this book is mostly reading, and the students doing less calculations. The classroom of this textbook has the teacher go through page by page to get the students comprehending and understanding of what is being taught. There are many hands on experiments also.

Cover Picture shows some toruses, some round some square, torus of rings, thin strips of rings or squares and shows them laid flat. That is Calculus of 3rd dimension that lays a ring in a torus to be flat in 2nd dimension.

Length: 105 pages

Product details

• ASIN : B0828M34VL

• Publication date : December 2, 2019

• Language : English

• File size : 952 KB

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #242,037 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #36 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

◦ #219 in Calculus (Books)

#5-6, 75th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 5 for age 20-21 Junior-year of College, math textbook series, book 6 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium 2019

This is volume 5, book 6 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Junior-year students, students of age 20-21. In first year college Calculus we learned calculus of the 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. And in sophomore year we learned calculus of 3rd dimension to complete our study of the mathematics needed to do the physics of electricity and magnetism. Now, junior year college, we move onto something different, for we focus mostly on logic now and especially the logic of what is called the "mathematical proof". Much of what the student has learned about mathematics so far has been given to her or him as stated knowledge, accept it as true because I say so. But now we are going to do math proofs. Oh, yes, we did prove a few items here and there, such as why the Decimal Grid Number system is so special, such as the Pythagorean Theorem, such as the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with its right-triangle hinged up or down. But many ideas we did not prove, we just stated them and expected all students to believe them true. And you are now juniors in college and we are going to start to prove many of those ideas and teach you "what is a math proof". Personally, I myself feel that the math proof is overrated, over hyped. But the math proof is important for one reason-- it makes you better scientists of knowing what is true and what is a shaky idea. A math proof is the same as "thinking straight and thinking clearly". And all scientists need to think straight and think clearly. But before we get to the Mathematics Proof, we have to do Probability and Statistics. What you learned in Grade School, then High School, then College, called Sigma Error, now becomes Probability and Statistics. It is important because all sciences including mathematics needs and uses Probability and Statistics. So, our job for junior-year of college mathematics is all cut out and ahead for us, no time to waste, let us get going.

Cover Picture: is a sample of the Array Proof, a proof the ellipse is not a conic but rather a cylinder cut wherein the oval is the slant cut of a cone, not the ellipse.

Length: 175 pages

Product details

ASIN : B0836F1YF6

Publication date : December 26, 2019

Language : English

File size : 741 KB

Lending : Enabled

Best Sellers Rank: #3,768,255 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #3,591 in Probability & Statistics (Kindle Store)

◦ #19,091 in Probability & Statistics (Books)

#5-7, 89th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 6 for age 21-22 Senior-year of College, math textbook series, book 7 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium 2020

Last revision was 6Feb2021.

Preface: This is the last year of College for mathematics and we have to mostly summarize all of mathematics as best we can. And set a new pattern to prepare students going on to math graduate school. A new pattern of work habits, because graduate school is more of research and explore on your own. So in this final year, I am going to eliminate tests, and have it mostly done as homework assignments.

Cover Picture: Again and again, many times in math, the mind is not good enough alone to think straight and clear, and you need tools to hands-on see how it works. Here is a collection of tools for this senior year college classes. There is a pencil, clipboard, graph paper, compass, divider, protractor, slide-ruler. And for this year we spend a lot of time on the parallelepiped, showing my wood model, and showing my erector set model held together by wire loops in the corners. The plastic square is there only to hold up the erector set model.

Length: 110 pages

Product details

ASIN : B084V11BGY

Publication date : February 15, 2020

Language : English

File size : 826 KB

Lending : Enabled

Best Sellers Rank: #224,965 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #345 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)

◦ #373 in Physics (Kindle Store)

◦ #2,256 in Physics (Books)

#5-8, 90th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 7 for age 22-26 Graduate school, math textbook series, book 8 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium 2020

Last revised 1NOV2020. This was AP's 90th published book of science.

Preface: This is College Graduate School mathematics. Congratulations, you made it this far. To me, graduate school is mostly research, research mathematics and that means also physics. So it is going to be difficult to do math without physics. Of course, we focus on the mathematics of these research projects.

My textbook for Graduate school is just a template and the professors teaching the graduate students are free of course to follow their own projects, but in terms of being physics and math combined. What I list below is a template for possible projects.

So, in the below projects, I list 36 possible research projects that a graduate student my like to undertake, or partake. I list those 36 projects with a set of parentheses like this (1), (2), (3), etc. Not to be confused with the chapters listing as 1), 2), 3), etc. I list 36 projects but the professor can offer his/her own list, and I expect students with their professor, to pick a project and to monitor the student as to his/her progresses through the research. I have listed each project then cited some of my own research into these projects, below each project is an entry. Those entries are just a help or helper in getting started or acquainted with the project. The entry has a date time group and a newsgroup that I posted to such as sci.math or plutonium-atom-universe Google newsgroups. Again the entry is just a help or helper in getting started.

Now instead of picking one or two projects for your Graduate years of study, some may select all 36 projects where you write a short paper on each project. Some may be bored with just one or two projects and opt for all 36.

Cover Picture: A photo by my iphone of a page on Permutations of the Jacobs book Mathematics: A Human Endeavor, 1970. One of the best textbooks ever written in Old Math, not for its contents because there are many errors, but for its teaching style. It is extremely rare to find a math textbook written for the student to learn. Probably because math professors rarely learned how to teach in the first place; only learned how to unintentionally obfuscate. The page I photographed is important because it is the interface between geometry's perimeter or surface area versus geometry's area or volume, respectively. Or, an interface of pure numbers with that of geometry. But I have more to say on this below.

Length: 296 pages

Product details

ASIN : B085DF8R7V

Publication date : March 1, 2020

Language : English

File size : 828 KB

Lending : Enabled

Best Sellers Rank: #224,981 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #13 in General Geometry

◦ #213 in Geometry & Topology (Books)

#5-9, 221st published book

An Education Ladder Guideline for teaching mathematics and a Test to see if you are cut out to be a mathematician//Teaching True Mathematics

Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of a rubber washer inside a plastic cone. The washer is at a steep slant angle to the cone perpendicular. Notice the washer near the apex is fully touching the side of the cone, but the washer directed towards the base has not yet cut through the side of the cone, and you can see a rainbow or a crescent shape of area where the washer will intersect the side of the cone, (where my two finger are), making a total figure of a Oval, never the ellipse. I was taking this picture as one person, so I had the iphone camera in one hand and the cone in another hand, and had to use a rubber washer to stay in place. The same green plastic cone used in this picture appears in both of my published books of the proof slant cut of cone is oval, never the ellipse.

My 3rd published book with the same green cone on cover.

• ASIN : B0BQDYMYKQ

• Publication date : December 16, 2022

• Language : English

• File size : 551 KB

• Print length : 65 pages

#5-10, 160th published book

MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic

by Archimedes Plutonium

Preface:

A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.

The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.

The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.

Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.

I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).

Product details

• ASIN : B09MZTLRL5 and ASIN : B09ZWFLKHC

• Publication date : December 2, 2021

• Product details

• ASIN : B09ZWFLKHC

• Publication date : May 8, 2022

• Language : English

• File size : 1154 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe

• Print length : 71 pages

y z

| /

| /

|/______ x

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Archimedes Plutonium

Kibo Parry-Moroney-Volney set up a open hate spew line with NSF money backing???

On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 10:51:51 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

>"failure"

> fails at math and science:

>Re: "psychoceramic"

On Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 1:40:39 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

> "Kim Jong Un's lackey" autistically melts

> down completely:

>"mindless fuckdog"

Kibo defiling of The Pope, AP and many others as paid for stalker, for 30 years now.

>

> On Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 1:40:39 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

> > "Kim Jong Un's lackey" autistically melts

> > down completely:

> >"mindless fuckdog"

> > On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 9:27:18 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

> > > Blowfly of Math and Screwfly of Physics

> > >"necrophile"

> > >"Pope Arky the Last"

The time in late 2022 when AP was giving condolences to a special deceased person, yet here comes Kibo with his hate channel gang of stalkers forging necrophila onto AP posts. Forgery that cost a ISP job of one of the forgers and trimmed Kibo's spamm, but not enough. And that Kibo needs to be banned altogether from sci.math and sci.physics, and all his morphed names.

> Kibo> I want to fuck her corpseUniv DaytonElizabeth Smith,Todd B.Smith,Ivan Sudakow,Perry Yaney

>

> > Kibo Parry's nymshifter Moroney-Volney open hate line of 30 year nonstop stalking hate spew

> Kibo Parry's nymshifter Moroney-Volney open hate line of 30 year nonstop stalking

> On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 3:14:40 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney (open hate line by James Kibo Parry 30 year paid stalker) wrote:

> >"Drag Queen of Science"

> > I want to fuck her corpse

> On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 3:14:40 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney (open hate line by James Kibo Parry 30 year paid stalker) wrote:

> >"Drag Queen of Science"

> > I want to fuck her corpse

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Archimedes Plutonium

#2-1, My 137th published book

Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

#1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory

This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.

Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.

Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.

And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.

Length: 64 pages

Product details

• File Size : 790 KB

• Publication Date : October 5, 2020

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Print Length : 64 pages

• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Language: : English

• ASIN : B08KS4YGWY

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory

◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)

◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

#2-2, 145th published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2

Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Product details

• ASIN : B08PC99JJB

• Publication date : November 29, 2020

• Language: : English

• File size : 682 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Print length : 78 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads

◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)

◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)

#2-3, 146th published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3

Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.

Product details

◦ ASIN : B08RK33T8V

◦ Publication date : December 28, 2020

◦ Language : English

◦ File size : 794 KB

◦ Text-to-Speech : Enabled

◦ Screen Reader : Supported

◦ Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

◦ X-Ray : Not Enabled

◦ Word Wise : Enabled

◦ Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
◦ Screen Reader : Supported

◦ Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

◦ X-Ray : Not Enabled

◦ Word Wise : Enabled

◦ Print length : 124 pages

◦ Best Sellers Rank: #293,315 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #401 in Physics (Kindle Store)

◦ #2,236 in Physics (Books)

#2-4, 151st published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4

Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.

Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.

Product details

• ASIN : B09JW5DVYM

• Publication date : October 19, 2021

• Language : English

• File size : 1048 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Print length : 404 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #4,844,838 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #487 in Electromagnetic Theory

◦ #1,210 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)

◦ #8,751 in Electromagnetism (Books)

#2-8, 202nd published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Permanent Colony on Europa// graduate school college

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle edition)

Preface: Crisis emergency times call for textbooks to reflect the times. The Sun gone Red Giant Initiation Phase as measured by NASA in the decade of 2010 to 2020 as showing a 0.005% Solar Radiation yearly increase threatens all life on Earth with extinction and oblivion. This crisis calls for "All Hands On Deck" to solve the problem. And to solve that problem we need all scientists in the work effort of getting Europa, the satellite of Jupiter to be our second home. I see no textbook for college graduate school as appropriate, unless it is a book addressing the crisis itself. Just the opposite of Nero was fiddling while Rome burned; we want All Hands on Deck, to save as much life on Earth as possible.

Cover Picture: Is my iphone photo of a Google search for Europa with Webb telescope. These are exciting times in that the Webb telescope maybe able to pinpoint life on Europa.

Product details

• ASIN : B0BC5T9JBH

• Publication date : August 27, 2022

• Language : English

• File size : 801 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Print length : 45 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Lending : Enabled

#2-9, 161st published book

PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.

Preface:

A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.

It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.

Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.

Product details

• ASIN : B09N18QPP1

• Publication date : December 3, 2021

• Language : English

• File size : 1139 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Print length : 82 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Lending : Enabled

#5-1, My 134th published book

Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had already written the series of TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS in a 7 volume, 8 book set. This would be the first book in that 8 book set (one of the books is a companion book to 1st year college). But I suppose that I needed to write the full series before I could write the Introduction and know what I had to talk about and talk about in a logical progression order. Sounds paradoxical in a sense, that I needed to write the full series first and then go back and write the Introduction. But in another sense, hard to write an introduction on something you have not really fully done and completed. For example to know what is error filled Old Math and to list those errors in a logical order requires me to write the full 7 volumes in order to list in order the mistakes.

Cover Picture: Mathematics begins with counting, with numbers, with quantity. But counting numbers needs geometry for something to count in the first place. So here in this picture of the generalized Hydrogen atom of chemistry and physics is a torus geometry of 8 rings of a proton torus and one ring where my fingers are, is a equator ring that is the muon and thrusting through the proton torus at the equator of the torus. So we count 9 rings in all. So math is created by atoms and math numbers exist because atoms have many geometry figures to count. And geometry exists because atoms have shapes and different figures.

Product details

• ASIN : B08K2XQB4M

• Publication date : September 24, 2020

• Language : English

• File size : 576 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Print length : 23 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #224,974 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #3 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

◦ #23 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

◦ #182 in Calculus (Books)

#5-2, 45th published

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon Kindle edition)

Last revision was 2NOV2020. And this is AP's 45th published book of science.

Preface: Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education.

This is a textbook series in several volumes that carries every person through all his/her math education starting age 5 up to age 26. Volume 2 is for age 5 year old to that of senior in High School, that is needed to do both science and math. Every other math book is incidental to this series of Teaching True Mathematics.

It is a journal-textbook because Amazon's Kindle offers me the ability to edit overnight, and to change the text, almost on a daily basis. A unique first in education textbooks-- almost a continual overnight editing. Adding new text, correcting text. Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education. Volume 3 carries the Freshperson in College for their math calculus education.

Cover Picture: The Numbers as Integers from 0 to 100, and 10 Grid when dividing by 10, and part of the 100 Grid when dividing by 100. Decimal Grid Numbers are the true numbers of mathematics. The Reals, the rationals & irrationals, the algebraic & transcendentals, the imaginary & Complex, and the negative-numbers are all fake numbers. For, to be a true number, you have to "be counted" by mathematical induction. The smallest Grid system is the Decimal 10 Grid.

Product details

ASIN : B07RG7BVZW

Publication date : May 2, 2019

Language : English

File size : 2024 KB

Text-to-Speech : Enabled

Screen Reader : Supported

Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

X-Ray : Not Enabled

Word Wise : Not Enabled

Print length : 423 pages
Screen Reader : Supported

Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

X-Ray : Not Enabled

Word Wise : Not Enabled

Lending : Enabled

Best Sellers Rank: #235,426 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

#15 in General Geometry

#223 in Geometry & Topology (Books)

#5-3, 55th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 25Jun2021. And this is AP's 55th published book of science.

Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019

Preface: This is volume 3, book 3 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Freshperson students, 1st year college students of age 18-19. It is the continuation of volume 2 for ages 5 through 18 years old.

The main major topic is the AP-EM equations of electricity and magnetism, the mathematics for the laws of electricity and magnetism; what used to be called the Maxwell Equations of Physics. The 1st Year College Math has to prepare all students with the math for all the sciences. So 1st year college Math is like a huge intersection station that has to prepare students with the math they need to do the hard sciences such as physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, geology, etc. What this means is, 1st year college is calculus that allows the student to work with electricity and magnetism. All the math that is needed to enable students to do electricity and magnetism. In Old Math before this textbook, those Old Math textbooks would end in 1/3 of the text about Arclength, vector space, div, curl, Line Integral, Green's, Stokes, Divergence theorem trying to reach and be able to teach Maxwell Equations. But sadly, barely any Old Math classroom reached that 1/3 ending of the textbook, and left all those college students without any math to tackle electricity and magnetism. And most of Old Math was just muddle headed wrong even if they covered the last 1/3 of the textbook. And that is totally unacceptable in science. This textbook fixes that huge hole and gap in Old Math education.

And there is no way around it, that a course in 1st year College Calculus is going to do a lot of hands on experiment with electricity and magnetism, and is required of the students to buy a list of physics apparatus-- multimeter, galvanometer, coil, bar magnet, alligator clip wires, electromagnet, iron filing case, and possibly even a 12 volt transformer, all shown in the cover picture. The beginning of this textbook and the middle section all leads into the ending of this textbook-- we learn the AP-EM Equations and how to use those equations. And there is no escaping the fact that it has to be hands on physics experiments in the classroom of mathematics.

But, do not be scared, for this is all easy easy easy. For if you passed and enjoyed Volume 2 TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, then I promise you, you will not be stressed with Volume 3, for I go out of my way to make it clear and understandable.

Warning: this is a Journal Textbook, meaning that I am constantly adding new material, constantly revising, constantly fixing mistakes or making things more clear. So if you read this book in August of 2019, chances are it is different when you read it in September 2019. Ebooks allow authors the freedom to improve their textbooks on a ongoing basis.

The 1st year college math should be about the math that prepares any and all students for science, whether they branch out into physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, or math, they should have all the math in 1st year college that will carry them through those science studies. I make every attempt possible to make math easy to understand, easy to learn and hopefully fun.

Product details

• ASIN : B07WN9RVXD

• Publication date : August 16, 2019

• Language : English

• File size : 1390 KB

• Simultaneous device usage : Unlimited

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Print length : 236 pages
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #1,377,070 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #411 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

◦ #2,480 in Calculus (Books)

#5-4, 56th published book

COLLEGE CALCULUS GUIDE to help students recognize math professor spam from math truth & reality// math textbook series, book 4 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

#1 New Releasein 15-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

This textbook is the companion guide book to AP's Teaching True Mathematics, 1st year College. It is realized that Old Math will take a long time in removing their fake math, so in the interim period, this Guide book is designed to speed up the process of removing fake Calculus out of the education system, the fewer students we punish with forcing them with fake Calculus, the better we are.

Cover Picture: This book is part comedy, for when you cannot reason with math professors that they have many errors to fix, that 90% of their Calculus is in error, you end up resorting to comedy, making fun of them, to prod them to fix their errors. To prod them to "do right by the students of the world" not their entrenched propaganda.

Length: 54 pages

Product details

File Size: 1035 KB

Print Length: 64 pages

Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited

Publication Date: August 18, 2019

Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC

Language: English

ASIN: B07WNGLQ85

Text-to-Speech: Enabled ￼

X-Ray:
Not Enabled ￼

Word Wise: Not Enabled

Lending: Enabled
Word Wise: Not Enabled

Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled ￼

Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #253,425 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)

#38 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

#318 in Calculus (Books)

#48 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

#5-5, 72nd published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 4 for age 19-20 Sophomore-year College, math textbook series, book 5 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface: This is volume 4, book 5 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Sophomore-year students, students of age 19-20. It is the continuation of volume 3 in the end-goal of learning how to do the mathematics of electricity and magnetism, because everything in physics is nothing but atoms and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. To know math, you have to know physics. We learned the Calculus of 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. But we did not learn the calculus of those equations for 3rd dimension. So, you can say that Sophomore year College math is devoted to 3D Calculus. This sophomore year college we fill in all the calculus, and we start over on all of Geometry, for geometry needs a modern day revision. And pardon me for this book is mostly reading, and the students doing less calculations. The classroom of this textbook has the teacher go through page by page to get the students comprehending and understanding of what is being taught. There are many hands on experiments also.

Cover Picture shows some toruses, some round some square, torus of rings, thin strips of rings or squares and shows them laid flat. That is Calculus of 3rd dimension that lays a ring in a torus to be flat in 2nd dimension.

Length: 105 pages

Product details

• ASIN : B0828M34VL

• Publication date : December 2, 2019

• Language : English

• File size : 952 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Print length : 105 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #242,037 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #36 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

◦ #219 in Calculus (Books)

#5-6, 75th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 5 for age 20-21 Junior-year of College, math textbook series, book 6 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium 2019

This is volume 5, book 6 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Junior-year students, students of age 20-21. In first year college Calculus we learned calculus of the 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. And in sophomore year we learned calculus of 3rd dimension to complete our study of the mathematics needed to do the physics of electricity and magnetism. Now, junior year college, we move onto something different, for we focus mostly on logic now and especially the logic of what is called the "mathematical proof". Much of what the student has learned about mathematics so far has been given to her or him as stated knowledge, accept it as true because I say so. But now we are going to do math proofs. Oh, yes, we did prove a few items here and there, such as why the Decimal Grid Number system is so special, such as the Pythagorean Theorem, such as the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with its right-triangle hinged up or down. But many ideas we did not prove, we just stated them and expected all students to believe them true. And you are now juniors in college and we are going to start to prove many of those ideas and teach you "what is a math proof". Personally, I myself feel that the math proof is overrated, over hyped. But the math proof is important for one reason-- it makes you better scientists of knowing what is true and what is a shaky idea. A math proof is the same as "thinking straight and thinking clearly". And all scientists need to think straight and think clearly. But before we get to the Mathematics Proof, we have to do Probability and Statistics. What you learned in Grade School, then High School, then College, called Sigma Error, now becomes Probability and Statistics. It is important because all sciences including mathematics needs and uses Probability and Statistics. So, our job for junior-year of college mathematics is all cut out and ahead for us, no time to waste, let us get going.

Cover Picture: is a sample of the Array Proof, a proof the ellipse is not a conic but rather a cylinder cut wherein the oval is the slant cut of a cone, not the ellipse.

Length: 175 pages

Product details

ASIN : B0836F1YF6

Publication date : December 26, 2019

Language : English

File size : 741 KB

Text-to-Speech : Enabled

Screen Reader : Supported

Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

X-Ray : Not Enabled

Word Wise : Not Enabled

Print length : 175 pages
Screen Reader : Supported

Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

X-Ray : Not Enabled

Word Wise : Not Enabled

Lending : Enabled

Best Sellers Rank: #3,768,255 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #3,591 in Probability & Statistics (Kindle Store)

◦ #19,091 in Probability & Statistics (Books)

#5-7, 89th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 6 for age 21-22 Senior-year of College, math textbook series, book 7 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium 2020

Last revision was 6Feb2021.

Preface: This is the last year of College for mathematics and we have to mostly summarize all of mathematics as best we can. And set a new pattern to prepare students going on to math graduate school. A new pattern of work habits, because graduate school is more of research and explore on your own. So in this final year, I am going to eliminate tests, and have it mostly done as homework assignments.

Cover Picture: Again and again, many times in math, the mind is not good enough alone to think straight and clear, and you need tools to hands-on see how it works. Here is a collection of tools for this senior year college classes. There is a pencil, clipboard, graph paper, compass, divider, protractor, slide-ruler. And for this year we spend a lot of time on the parallelepiped, showing my wood model, and showing my erector set model held together by wire loops in the corners. The plastic square is there only to hold up the erector set model.

Length: 110 pages

Product details

ASIN : B084V11BGY

Publication date : February 15, 2020

Language : English

File size : 826 KB

Text-to-Speech : Enabled

Screen Reader : Supported

Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

X-Ray : Not Enabled

Word Wise : Enabled

Print length : 110 pages
Screen Reader : Supported

Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

X-Ray : Not Enabled

Word Wise : Enabled

Lending : Enabled

Best Sellers Rank: #224,965 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #345 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)

◦ #373 in Physics (Kindle Store)

◦ #2,256 in Physics (Books)

#5-8, 90th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 7 for age 22-26 Graduate school, math textbook series, book 8 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium 2020

Last revised 1NOV2020. This was AP's 90th published book of science.

Preface: This is College Graduate School mathematics. Congratulations, you made it this far. To me, graduate school is mostly research, research mathematics and that means also physics. So it is going to be difficult to do math without physics. Of course, we focus on the mathematics of these research projects.

My textbook for Graduate school is just a template and the professors teaching the graduate students are free of course to follow their own projects, but in terms of being physics and math combined. What I list below is a template for possible projects.

So, in the below projects, I list 36 possible research projects that a graduate student my like to undertake, or partake. I list those 36 projects with a set of parentheses like this (1), (2), (3), etc. Not to be confused with the chapters listing as 1), 2), 3), etc. I list 36 projects but the professor can offer his/her own list, and I expect students with their professor, to pick a project and to monitor the student as to his/her progresses through the research. I have listed each project then cited some of my own research into these projects, below each project is an entry. Those entries are just a help or helper in getting started or acquainted with the project. The entry has a date time group and a newsgroup that I posted to such as sci.math or plutonium-atom-universe Google newsgroups. Again the entry is just a help or helper in getting started.

Now instead of picking one or two projects for your Graduate years of study, some may select all 36 projects where you write a short paper on each project. Some may be bored with just one or two projects and opt for all 36.

Cover Picture: A photo by my iphone of a page on Permutations of the Jacobs book Mathematics: A Human Endeavor, 1970. One of the best textbooks ever written in Old Math, not for its contents because there are many errors, but for its teaching style. It is extremely rare to find a math textbook written for the student to learn. Probably because math professors rarely learned how to teach in the first place; only learned how to unintentionally obfuscate. The page I photographed is important because it is the interface between geometry's perimeter or surface area versus geometry's area or volume, respectively. Or, an interface of pure numbers with that of geometry. But I have more to say on this below.

Length: 296 pages

Product details

ASIN : B085DF8R7V

Publication date : March 1, 2020

Language : English

File size : 828 KB

Text-to-Speech : Enabled

Screen Reader : Supported

Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

X-Ray : Not Enabled

Word Wise : Not Enabled

Print length : 296 pages
Screen Reader : Supported

Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

X-Ray : Not Enabled

Word Wise : Not Enabled

Lending : Enabled

Best Sellers Rank: #224,981 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #13 in General Geometry

◦ #213 in Geometry & Topology (Books)

#5-9, 221st published book

An Education Ladder Guideline for teaching mathematics and a Test to see if you are cut out to be a mathematician//Teaching True Mathematics

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Preface: This book is written to improve math education in school and at home. Trouble is, you cannot improve math education if the professors of mathematics have much of their teachings in error. So I write this book mostly as a test for math professors because to shine a light on math professor failure is the best way to improve math teaching, and thereby improve school curriculums especially colleges and universities. But others, such as laypersons are welcomed to join in. And it is the laypersons and students that will make the greatest amount of use of this book because math professors are usually stubborn and idiotic and hard to change for the better. And so when students and laypersons keep asking questions of their math professors, their brainwashing and thus poor teaching, they eventually come around to the truth and then change their bad behavior and bad misunderstanding; to proper true mathematics.
Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of a rubber washer inside a plastic cone. The washer is at a steep slant angle to the cone perpendicular. Notice the washer near the apex is fully touching the side of the cone, but the washer directed towards the base has not yet cut through the side of the cone, and you can see a rainbow or a crescent shape of area where the washer will intersect the side of the cone, (where my two finger are), making a total figure of a Oval, never the ellipse. I was taking this picture as one person, so I had the iphone camera in one hand and the cone in another hand, and had to use a rubber washer to stay in place. The same green plastic cone used in this picture appears in both of my published books of the proof slant cut of cone is oval, never the ellipse.

My 3rd published book with the same green cone on cover.

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

My 68th published book with the same green cone on cover.
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Product details
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

• ASIN : B0BQDYMYKQ

• Publication date : December 16, 2022

• Language : English

• File size : 551 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Print length : 65 pages

#5-10, 160th published book

MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic

by Archimedes Plutonium

Preface:

A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.

The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.

The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.

Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.

I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).

Product details

• ASIN : B09MZTLRL5 and ASIN : B09ZWFLKHC

• Publication date : December 2, 2021

• Product details

• ASIN : B09ZWFLKHC

• Publication date : May 8, 2022

• Language : English

• File size : 1154 KB

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Print length : 71 pages

y z

| /

| /

|/______ x

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Archimedes Plutonium

Reply all

Reply to author

Forward

0 new messages

Search

Clear search

Close search

Google apps

Main menu