36 views

Skip to first unread message

Nov 27, 2021, 9:40:36 PM11/27/21

to

subtracting from zero does not exist as real.

It is like imaginary math... it is just the mathematicians

imaginary belief.

Mitchell Raemsch

It is like imaginary math... it is just the mathematicians

imaginary belief.

Mitchell Raemsch

Nov 27, 2021, 9:55:20 PM11/27/21

to

Negative electric charge is quite real, Roy.

Nov 28, 2021, 1:38:36 PM11/28/21

to

It is still a positive amount you moron.

Mitchell Raemsch

Nov 28, 2021, 1:39:22 PM11/28/21

to

Sô? It being "real" or not doesn't matter.

> It is like imaginary math... it is just the mathematicians

> imaginary belief.

Sô? It being imaginary or not doesn't matter: it works.

> Mitchell Raemsch

nabru.

--

nabru | "This PIZZA symbolizes |

| my COMPLETE EMOTIONAL RECOVERY!!" |

------ ------------------------------------

> It is like imaginary math... it is just the mathematicians

> imaginary belief.

> Mitchell Raemsch

nabru.

--

nabru | "This PIZZA symbolizes |

| my COMPLETE EMOTIONAL RECOVERY!!" |

------ ------------------------------------

Nov 28, 2021, 1:41:25 PM11/28/21

to

MitchR could Jill Pipher, Andrew Beal, Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, possibly ever do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, FTC? I say possibly because they cannot even correct their mistake that a slant cut in single cone is not an ellipse but is a oval. Since they cannot even see that mistake in conics, there is no hope or prayer that they can do a geometry proof of FTC.

MitchR can Ken Ribet, Andrew Beal, Jill Pipher, Roger Penrose ever do a geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus? We know you Amine cannot, for you spend all your time spamming Usenet. In fact we do not know if Amine can do any math that is college level math.

On Friday, November 26, 2021 at 5:15:54 PM UTC-6, Amine Moulay Ramdane wrote:

> "A Harvard immunologist said

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Length: 21 pages

File Size: 1620 KB

Print Length: 21 pages

Publication Date: March 11, 2019

Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC

Language: English

ASIN: B07PLSDQWC

Text-to-Speech: Enabled

X-Ray: Not Enabled

Word Wise: Not Enabled

Lending: Enabled

Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 19May2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.

Preface:

Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Length: 137 pages

Product details

ASIN : B07PQTNHMY

Publication date : March 14, 2019

Language : English

File size : 1307 KB

Text-to-Speech : Enabled

Screen Reader : Supported

Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

X-Ray : Not Enabled

Word Wise : Not Enabled

Print length : 137 pages

Lending : Enabled

Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)

#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

#134 in Calculus (Books)

#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

MitchR can Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez, Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss please ask the question, which is the atom's real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole.

Undeserving of awards in both physics and math

Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,

Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish

David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita

Arthur B. McDonald

Francois Englert

Saul Perlmutter

Brian P. Schmidt

Adam G. Riess

Makoto Kobayashi

Toshihide Maskawa

Yoichiro Nambu

John C. Mather

George F. Smoot

Roy J. Glauber

David J. Gross

Hugh David Politzer

Frank Wilczek

Raymond Davis Jr.

Masatoshi Koshiba

Riccardo Giacconi

Gerardus 't Hooft

Martinus J.G. Veltman

Jerome I. Friedman

Henry W. Kendall

Richard E. Taylor

Carlo Rubbia

Simon van der Meer

William Alfred Fowler

Kenneth G. Wilson

James Watson Cronin

Val Logsdon Fitch

Sheldon Lee Glashow

Steven Weinberg

.

.

little fishes

.

.

Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV

Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass

Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu

more and more layers of error thinking physics

.

.

John Baez

Brian Greene

Lisa Randall

Alan H. Guth

Michael E. Brown

Konstantin Batygin

Ben Bullock

Larry Harson

Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan

Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views

None at all - he was a raving nutter.

Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley

Edward Witten

HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.

Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.

Length: 17 pages

Product details

• Publication Date : December 18, 2019

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Print Length : 17 pages

• File Size : 698 KB

• ASIN : B082WYGVNG

• Language: : English

• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled

• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Lending : Enabled

#1-4, 105th published book

Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.

Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.

Length: 39 pages

Product details

• Publication Date : March 24, 2020

• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• ASIN : B086BGSNXN

• Print Length : 39 pages

• File Size : 935 KB

• Language: : English

• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled

• Lending : Enabled

Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)

#6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)

#315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads

#4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#1-5, 112th published book

New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5

Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.

Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.

Length: 20 pages

Product details

• ASIN : B0875SVDC7

• Publication date : April 15, 2020

• Language: : English

• File size : 1134 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Print length : 20 pages

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference

◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#1-6, 135th published book

QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.

Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.

Product details

• ASIN : B08K47K5BB

• Publication date : September 25, 2020

• Language : English

• File size : 587 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Print length : 25 pages

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference

◦ #334 in General Chemistry

#1-7, 138th published book

The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.

Length: 41 pages

Product details

• Publication Date : October 9, 2020

• File Size : 828 KB

• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Print Length : 41 pages

• ASIN : B08KZT5TCD

• Language: : English

• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled

• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Lending : Enabled

#1-8, 1st published book

Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.

Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.

Foreward:

I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.

Length: 632 pages

Product details

File Size: 1132 KB

Print Length: 632 pages

Publication Date: March 11, 2019

Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC

Language: English

ASIN: B07PLP9NDR

Text-to-Speech: Enabled

X-Ray: Not Enabled

Word Wise: Enabled

Lending: Enabled

Screen Reader: Supported

Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)

#1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#8526 in Physics (Books)

#18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)

#2-1, 137th published book

Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

#1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory

This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.

Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.

Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.

And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.

Length: 64 pages

Product details

• File Size : 790 KB

• Publication Date : October 5, 2020

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Print Length : 64 pages

• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Language: : English

• ASIN : B08KS4YGWY

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory

◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)

◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

#2-2, 145th published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2

Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.

Product details

• ASIN : B08PC99JJB

• Publication date : November 29, 2020

• Language: : English

• File size : 682 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Print length : 78 pages

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads

◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)

◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)

#2-3, 146th published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3

Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.

Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.

Product details

• ASIN : B08RK33T8V

• Publication date : December 28, 2020

• Language : English

• File size : 794 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Print length : 123 pages

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)

◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)

#2-4, 151st published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4

Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.

Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.

Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.

Product details

• ASIN : B09JW5DVYM

• Publication date : October 19, 2021

• Language : English

• File size : 1033 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Print length : 386 pages

• Lending : Enabled

#3-1, 2nd published book

True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.

Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.

Length: 1150 pages

Product details

• File Size : 2167 KB

• ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ

• Publication Date : March 11, 2019

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Print Length : 1150 pages

• Language: : English

• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled

• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Lending : Enabled

Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)

#181 in General Chemistry & Reference

#1324 in General Chemistry

#1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)

y z

| /

| /

|/______ x

More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.

In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.

There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Archimedes Plutonium

MitchR can Ken Ribet, Andrew Beal, Jill Pipher, Roger Penrose ever do a geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus? We know you Amine cannot, for you spend all your time spamming Usenet. In fact we do not know if Amine can do any math that is college level math.

On Friday, November 26, 2021 at 5:15:54 PM UTC-6, Amine Moulay Ramdane wrote:

> "A Harvard immunologist said

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Length: 21 pages

File Size: 1620 KB

Print Length: 21 pages

Publication Date: March 11, 2019

Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC

Language: English

ASIN: B07PLSDQWC

Text-to-Speech: Enabled

X-Ray: Not Enabled

Word Wise: Not Enabled

Lending: Enabled

Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 19May2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.

Preface:

Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Length: 137 pages

Product details

ASIN : B07PQTNHMY

Publication date : March 14, 2019

Language : English

File size : 1307 KB

Text-to-Speech : Enabled

Screen Reader : Supported

Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

X-Ray : Not Enabled

Word Wise : Not Enabled

Print length : 137 pages

Lending : Enabled

Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)

#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

#134 in Calculus (Books)

#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

MitchR can Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez, Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss please ask the question, which is the atom's real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole.

Undeserving of awards in both physics and math

Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,

Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish

David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita

Arthur B. McDonald

Francois Englert

Saul Perlmutter

Brian P. Schmidt

Adam G. Riess

Makoto Kobayashi

Toshihide Maskawa

Yoichiro Nambu

John C. Mather

George F. Smoot

Roy J. Glauber

David J. Gross

Hugh David Politzer

Frank Wilczek

Raymond Davis Jr.

Masatoshi Koshiba

Riccardo Giacconi

Gerardus 't Hooft

Martinus J.G. Veltman

Jerome I. Friedman

Henry W. Kendall

Richard E. Taylor

Carlo Rubbia

Simon van der Meer

William Alfred Fowler

Kenneth G. Wilson

James Watson Cronin

Val Logsdon Fitch

Sheldon Lee Glashow

Steven Weinberg

.

.

little fishes

.

.

Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV

Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass

Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu

more and more layers of error thinking physics

.

.

John Baez

Brian Greene

Lisa Randall

Alan H. Guth

Michael E. Brown

Konstantin Batygin

Ben Bullock

Larry Harson

Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan

Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views

None at all - he was a raving nutter.

Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley

Edward Witten

HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.

Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.

Length: 17 pages

Product details

• Publication Date : December 18, 2019

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Print Length : 17 pages

• File Size : 698 KB

• ASIN : B082WYGVNG

• Language: : English

• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled

• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Lending : Enabled

#1-4, 105th published book

Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.

Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.

Length: 39 pages

Product details

• Publication Date : March 24, 2020

• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• ASIN : B086BGSNXN

• Print Length : 39 pages

• File Size : 935 KB

• Language: : English

• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled

• Lending : Enabled

Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)

#6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)

#315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads

#4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#1-5, 112th published book

New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5

Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.

Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.

Length: 20 pages

Product details

• ASIN : B0875SVDC7

• Publication date : April 15, 2020

• Language: : English

• File size : 1134 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Print length : 20 pages

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference

◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#1-6, 135th published book

QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.

Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.

Product details

• ASIN : B08K47K5BB

• Publication date : September 25, 2020

• Language : English

• File size : 587 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Print length : 25 pages

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference

◦ #334 in General Chemistry

#1-7, 138th published book

The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.

Length: 41 pages

Product details

• Publication Date : October 9, 2020

• File Size : 828 KB

• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Print Length : 41 pages

• ASIN : B08KZT5TCD

• Language: : English

• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled

• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Lending : Enabled

#1-8, 1st published book

Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.

Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.

Foreward:

I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.

Length: 632 pages

Product details

File Size: 1132 KB

Print Length: 632 pages

Publication Date: March 11, 2019

Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC

Language: English

ASIN: B07PLP9NDR

Text-to-Speech: Enabled

X-Ray: Not Enabled

Word Wise: Enabled

Lending: Enabled

Screen Reader: Supported

Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)

#1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#8526 in Physics (Books)

#18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)

#2-1, 137th published book

Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

#1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory

This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.

Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.

Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.

And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.

Length: 64 pages

Product details

• File Size : 790 KB

• Publication Date : October 5, 2020

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Print Length : 64 pages

• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Language: : English

• ASIN : B08KS4YGWY

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory

◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)

◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

#2-2, 145th published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2

Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.

Product details

• ASIN : B08PC99JJB

• Publication date : November 29, 2020

• Language: : English

• File size : 682 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Print length : 78 pages

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads

◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)

◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)

#2-3, 146th published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3

Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.

Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.

Product details

• ASIN : B08RK33T8V

• Publication date : December 28, 2020

• Language : English

• File size : 794 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Print length : 123 pages

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)

◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)

#2-4, 151st published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4

Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.

Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.

Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.

Product details

• ASIN : B09JW5DVYM

• Publication date : October 19, 2021

• Language : English

• File size : 1033 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Print length : 386 pages

• Lending : Enabled

#3-1, 2nd published book

True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.

Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.

Length: 1150 pages

Product details

• File Size : 2167 KB

• ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ

• Publication Date : March 11, 2019

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Print Length : 1150 pages

• Language: : English

• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled

• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Lending : Enabled

Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)

#181 in General Chemistry & Reference

#1324 in General Chemistry

#1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)

y z

| /

| /

|/______ x

More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.

In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.

There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

Archimedes Plutonium

Nov 28, 2021, 10:15:50 PM11/28/21

to

On 11/28/2021 1:38 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> On Saturday, November 27, 2021 at 6:55:20 PM UTC-8, Michael Moroney wrote:

>> On 11/27/2021 9:40 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

>>> subtracting from zero does not exist as real.

>> Negative electric charge is quite real, Roy.

>

> But that is not negative amount of electrons.

Roy Masters, it is a negative amount of electric charge!
> On Saturday, November 27, 2021 at 6:55:20 PM UTC-8, Michael Moroney wrote:

>> On 11/27/2021 9:40 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

>>> subtracting from zero does not exist as real.

>> Negative electric charge is quite real, Roy.

>

> But that is not negative amount of electrons.

> It is still a positive amount you moron.

use protons or positrons instead.

Nov 28, 2021, 10:51:29 PM11/28/21

to

On Sunday, November 28, 2021 at 7:15:50 PM UTC-8, Michael Moroney wrote:

> On 11/28/2021 1:38 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> > On Saturday, November 27, 2021 at 6:55:20 PM UTC-8, Michael Moroney wrote:

> >> On 11/27/2021 9:40 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> >>> subtracting from zero does not exist as real.

> >> Negative electric charge is quite real, Roy.

> >

> > But that is not negative amount of electrons.

> Roy Masters, it is a negative amount of electric charge!

Roy masters is dead. How is it an amount of negative charge?
> On 11/28/2021 1:38 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> > On Saturday, November 27, 2021 at 6:55:20 PM UTC-8, Michael Moroney wrote:

> >> On 11/27/2021 9:40 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> >>> subtracting from zero does not exist as real.

> >> Negative electric charge is quite real, Roy.

> >

> > But that is not negative amount of electrons.

> Roy Masters, it is a negative amount of electric charge!

> > It is still a positive amount you moron.

> A negative amount of electric charge, Roy. If you want positive charge,

> use protons or positrons instead.

Mitchell Raemsch

Nov 29, 2021, 12:33:09 AM11/29/21

to

Nov 29, 2021, 12:55:41 AM11/29/21

to

On 11/28/2021 10:51 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> On Sunday, November 28, 2021 at 7:15:50 PM UTC-8, Michael Moroney wrote:

>> On 11/28/2021 1:38 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

>>> On Saturday, November 27, 2021 at 6:55:20 PM UTC-8, Michael Moroney wrote:

>>>> On 11/27/2021 9:40 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

>>>>> subtracting from zero does not exist as real.

>>>> Negative electric charge is quite real, Roy.

>>>

>>> But that is not negative amount of electrons.

>> Roy Masters, it is a negative amount of electric charge!

>

> Roy masters is dead.

Naah, you must be the Second Coming of Roy Masters because you lie as
> On Sunday, November 28, 2021 at 7:15:50 PM UTC-8, Michael Moroney wrote:

>> On 11/28/2021 1:38 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

>>> On Saturday, November 27, 2021 at 6:55:20 PM UTC-8, Michael Moroney wrote:

>>>> On 11/27/2021 9:40 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

>>>>> subtracting from zero does not exist as real.

>>>> Negative electric charge is quite real, Roy.

>>>

>>> But that is not negative amount of electrons.

>> Roy Masters, it is a negative amount of electric charge!

>

> Roy masters is dead.

much as only he could lie.

> How is it an amount of negative charge?

charge behaves mathematically EXACTLY as the negative number math (which

you claim doesn't exist) does. Simplest example: 1 electron charge + 1

proton charge = ZERO net charge. Just like -1 + 1 = 0.

>

>>> It is still a positive amount you moron.

Nope. If you redefine the electron charge as being positive, the
>>> It is still a positive amount you moron.

proton's charge becomes negative and you are right where you started.

Negative number mathematics.

>> A negative amount of electric charge, Roy. If you want positive charge,

>> use protons or positrons instead.

>

> What is your negative amount doing?

for you, negative number mathematics is real!

Dec 5, 2021, 1:22:48 PM12/5/21

to

Math is imaginary...

They named it right.

Mitchell Raemsch

Dec 5, 2021, 7:26:11 PM12/5/21

to

Dec 5, 2021, 7:27:55 PM12/5/21

to

> Math is imaginary...

For once you're not lying, Smitch. All math is abstract; however math

makes for excellent models of physics and other sciences. For example,

the mathematics of positive and negative real numbers makes an excellent

model of the behavior of electric charges if you call a charge which

repels an electron 'negative' and attracts an electron 'positive'.

Dec 5, 2021, 10:26:57 PM12/5/21

to

side positive. Put three unit weights on the right hand side... The

scale is all the way down on the right. Put four unit weights on the

left side. Now, the scale is a little down, one units worth in a sense,

on the left. The negative region... ;^)

(-0) + (+3) = +3, favors the positive side.

(-4) + (+3) = -1, favors the negative side.

Make any sense to you? To make it balance, put 3 unit weights on the

left side instead of four:

(-3) + (+3) = 0, balanced!

Dec 7, 2021, 2:07:47 PM12/7/21

to

would it be important?

Mitchell Raemsch

Dec 7, 2021, 7:26:16 PM12/7/21

to

model base to describe what nature is doing (science), by creating

models. And, depending on the situation, various kinds of math can be

used, positive integers, positive and negative reals, complex numbers,

quaternions etc. Just because you can't understand more than the

simplest of math doesn't mean it doesn't exist or is wrong.

Dec 8, 2021, 3:36:47 AM12/8/21

to

Dec 8, 2021, 2:57:51 PM12/8/21

to

Reply all

Reply to author

Forward

0 new messages

Search

Clear search

Close search

Google apps

Main menu