info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
1,795 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
Michael Moroney
Jan 23, 2018, 11:24:48 AM1/23/18
to
Autistic Archie Plutonium writes:
<snip>
The usual "12 Failures of Plutonium" + personal attack + stalking of
Harvard professors.
You succumbed to your autism again, I see. Better luck next time.
Dan Christensen
Jan 23, 2018, 11:46:18 AM1/23/18
to
Dan
Message has been deleted
Jan
Jan 24, 2018, 5:04:33 PM1/24/18
to
On Tuesday, January 23, 2018 at 1:12:31 AM UTC-8, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Proofs that the Real Electron=muon,
Electron is not muon (muon is unstable for starters).
BTW, since you are trying to work with particle physics, do you mind if
I test your knowledge? Just to make sure you can even do what you are
setting out to do.
So: (and I've asked this before) what is the value of the 2-vertex
Feynman diagram of electron-muon scattering? (see, I'm making it simple
for you, two electrons would be more work). Please list which Feynman
rules you used and why.
--
Jan
> Proofs that the Real Electron=muon,
Electron is not muon (muon is unstable for starters).
BTW, since you are trying to work with particle physics, do you mind if
I test your knowledge? Just to make sure you can even do what you are
setting out to do.
So: (and I've asked this before) what is the value of the 2-vertex
Feynman diagram of electron-muon scattering? (see, I'm making it simple
for you, two electrons would be more work). Please list which Feynman
rules you used and why.
--
Jan
Jan
Jan 24, 2018, 5:06:51 PM1/24/18
to
On Wednesday, January 24, 2018 at 1:54:35 PM UTC-8, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>
> --------------
> Jan, your the nonsense guy, full of it
The spelling is "you're", not "your". And why do you print those idiotic
lists of some professors at some universities? How about your grocery
list instead? I'm curious: is quinoa on that list?
--
Jan
>
> --------------
> Jan, your the nonsense guy, full of it
The spelling is "you're", not "your". And why do you print those idiotic
lists of some professors at some universities? How about your grocery
list instead? I'm curious: is quinoa on that list?
--
Jan
Michael Moroney
Jan 24, 2018, 5:51:30 PM1/24/18
to
Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> writes:
<snip another autistic repost of the 12 Failures of Plutonium plus
professor stalking, yet again>
I see you are still envious of the fact I got to do science experiments
in high school where I measured the electron's charge and the charge/mass
ratio, and thus calculated the electron's mass. Where, apparently,
all you did in high school was to learn to be a failure.
That physics class was fun! Hard but fun.
>--------------
>You aren't chasing anything. You're shitting in your hat, and getting
> ready to put it on.
>--------------------
>Alouatta, such profanity, did you even go to school
Says the guy who starts multiple topics titled "ANAL BUTTFUCK MANURE"!!!
HYPOCRITE.
FAIL.
<snip another autistic repost of the 12 Failures of Plutonium plus
professor stalking, yet again>
I see you are still envious of the fact I got to do science experiments
in high school where I measured the electron's charge and the charge/mass
ratio, and thus calculated the electron's mass. Where, apparently,
all you did in high school was to learn to be a failure.
That physics class was fun! Hard but fun.
>--------------
>You aren't chasing anything. You're shitting in your hat, and getting
> ready to put it on.
>--------------------
>Alouatta, such profanity, did you even go to school
Says the guy who starts multiple topics titled "ANAL BUTTFUCK MANURE"!!!
HYPOCRITE.
FAIL.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Michael Moroney
Jan 25, 2018, 6:16:59 PM1/25/18
to
Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> babbles:
>Are you a scientist or a foolish idiot when you believe Fe+2 or Fe-2 are
>still iron atoms either gaining or losing 2 electrons
>Are you really that stupid to think the electrons of atoms are that easy
>to lose or gain--are you that stupid
>You are a scientist when you understand Fe+2 or Fe-2 is Fe with 2
>magnetic monopoles attached either 2 -magnetic monopoles or +magnetic
>monopoles
>Stop idiot professors teaching you utter nonsense
At least with this subject we can figure out whom you are babbling to or
about. Dr. Sheldon Glashow.
I do hope you realize that Dr. Glashow of Harvard and Boston University is
a Nobel Prize winning theoretical particle physicist, predicting the
neutral weak current and unifying the electromagnetic and weak interactions
into the electroweak interaction. He probably has forgotton more about the
electron and muon than you'll ever know, just today.
Who the hell are you to tell him he's stupid or a foolish idiot?
>Are you a scientist or a foolish idiot when you believe Fe+2 or Fe-2 are
>still iron atoms either gaining or losing 2 electrons
>Are you really that stupid to think the electrons of atoms are that easy
>to lose or gain--are you that stupid
>You are a scientist when you understand Fe+2 or Fe-2 is Fe with 2
>magnetic monopoles attached either 2 -magnetic monopoles or +magnetic
>monopoles
>Stop idiot professors teaching you utter nonsense
At least with this subject we can figure out whom you are babbling to or
about. Dr. Sheldon Glashow.
I do hope you realize that Dr. Glashow of Harvard and Boston University is
a Nobel Prize winning theoretical particle physicist, predicting the
neutral weak current and unifying the electromagnetic and weak interactions
into the electroweak interaction. He probably has forgotton more about the
electron and muon than you'll ever know, just today.
Who the hell are you to tell him he's stupid or a foolish idiot?
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Dan Christensen
Jan 27, 2018, 1:59:35 PM1/27/18
to
Geez, Archie, this little campaign of yours should cement your reputation as the top internet crank of all time... for sure!
Dan
Dan
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Chris M. Thomasson
Oct 30, 2018, 8:27:36 PM10/30/18
to
Message has been deleted
Chris M. Thomasson
Oct 30, 2018, 10:37:47 PM10/30/18
to
On 10/30/2018 7:25 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>
I gave you some points.
> On Tuesday, October 30, 2018 at 7:27:36 PM UTC-5, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>
>> Imvvvho, Kim Peek is a Genius! autism? Wow, what a brain.
>
> What would you know Chris, for you cannot even render the correct coordinate points of the tractrix when asked of you
>
>> Imvvvho, Kim Peek is a Genius! autism? Wow, what a brain.
>
>
I gave you some points.
Michael Moroney
Oct 30, 2018, 11:29:05 PM10/30/18
to
Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails:
> To understand Ohm's law, we mirror it to
Aren't you going to tell me who "we"/"us" are? Do you have a mouse in
your pocket?
>Michael Moroney writes :
>Oct30, 1:49 PM (5 hours ago)
>Who are "we" and "us", Failure Plutonium?
BTW thank you for asking me to start discussions in all your threads.
I'm glad you finally realize that these are discussion groups.
> To understand Ohm's law, we mirror it to
Aren't you going to tell me who "we"/"us" are? Do you have a mouse in
your pocket?
>Michael Moroney writes :
>Oct30, 1:49 PM (5 hours ago)
>Who are "we" and "us", Failure Plutonium?
BTW thank you for asking me to start discussions in all your threads.
I'm glad you finally realize that these are discussion groups.
Message has been deleted
Michael Moroney
Oct 31, 2018, 12:20:15 AM10/31/18
to
>On Tuesday, January 30, 2018 at 8:44:43 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> Poor, poor, Failure Plutonium...
>Drs.C.Eisgruber, Edward Witten, N. Katz
>Proofs that the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV, and that the
>.5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole, after all
>by Archimedes Plutonium
>12 PROOFS that Real-Electron = muon
Oh wow, it has been a while since you posted the 12 Failures of Plutonium!
Do you have any new failures?
>> Poor, poor, Failure Plutonium...
>Drs.C.Eisgruber, Edward Witten, N. Katz
>Proofs that the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV, and that the
>.5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole, after all
>by Archimedes Plutonium
>12 PROOFS that Real-Electron = muon
Oh wow, it has been a while since you posted the 12 Failures of Plutonium!
Do you have any new failures?
Message has been deleted
Michael Moroney
Oct 31, 2018, 10:50:49 PM10/31/18
to
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: don't they teach footnotes and citing references in Israel-- or only stealing is taught Re: Why does Israel steal so much science? Porat stealing Lord Kelvin, &Tait's circlon
Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> writes:
>Y.Porat
>Never any physics, all about stealing
Archimedes Plutonium. Never any physics, all about attacking other posters.
>AP writes: from Moroney, never any math, never any physics, always bad
>mouthing and put down, for 25 years
Archimedes Plutonium, never any math, never any physics, always bad
mouthing and put down, for 25 years
Subject: Re: don't they teach footnotes and citing references in Israel-- or only stealing is taught Re: Why does Israel steal so much science? Porat stealing Lord Kelvin, &Tait's circlon
Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> writes:
>Y.Porat
>Never any physics, all about stealing
Archimedes Plutonium. Never any physics, all about attacking other posters.
>AP writes: from Moroney, never any math, never any physics, always bad
>mouthing and put down, for 25 years
Archimedes Plutonium, never any math, never any physics, always bad
mouthing and put down, for 25 years
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Michael Moroney
Dec 5, 2018, 2:03:08 AM12/5/18
to
>On Tuesday, December 4, 2018 at 4:52:40 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium failed at math
>Subject: Re: Insane kook Moroney mocking MIT, Harvard, Cornell
No, Failure Plutonium. We mock stupidities like the Plutonium Stupidity
Theory, the unstable muon existing in atoms (for more than 2.2 microseconds,
anyway), the sine wave not being a sine wave, 8.88 muons = 9 muons, and
the rest of the stupidities you have posted over the past quarter century!
Not to mention your stalking professors and stupid '90s ascii art.
>> Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium failed at math
>Subject: Re: Insane kook Moroney mocking MIT, Harvard, Cornell
No, Failure Plutonium. We mock stupidities like the Plutonium Stupidity
Theory, the unstable muon existing in atoms (for more than 2.2 microseconds,
anyway), the sine wave not being a sine wave, 8.88 muons = 9 muons, and
the rest of the stupidities you have posted over the past quarter century!
Not to mention your stalking professors and stupid '90s ascii art.
Message has been deleted
Michael Moroney
Dec 5, 2018, 2:33:04 AM12/5/18
to
>Subject: Re: Moroney-- never a good word about anyone in science-- insane
>Moroney-- endless mockery, endless ad hominem-- never a kind word or praise=
> of anyone in science. From what sewer did they drag him out of?
Wrong, failure Plutonium. I love science! I hold scientists in very high
regard!
Of course, saying "it's true because I say so!" is certainly not science,
so you get left out. Too bad for you, but that's what happens when you
are a science failure and not a scientist.
Let's have another opinion. Hey, Uncle Al, what do you think of the
Plutonium Stupidity Theory as science?
"I cannot believe how incredibly stupid Archie-Poo is. I mean rock-hard
stupid. Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid. Surface of Venus
under 80 atmospheres of red hot carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid vapor
dehydrated for 300 million years rock-hard stupid. Stupid so stupid that
it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different sensorium of
stupid. Archie-Poo is trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid. Stupid so
collapsed upon itself that it is within its own Schwarzschild radius.
Black hole stupid. Stupid gotten so dense and massive that no intellect
can escape. Singularity stupid. Archie-Poo emits more stupid/second than
our entire galaxy otherwise emits stupid/year. Quasar stupid. Nothing
else in the universe can be this stupid. Archie-Poo is an oozingly
putrescent primordial fragment from the original Big Bang of Stupid, a
pure essence of stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond
the laws of physics that define maximally extrapolated hypergeometric
n-dimensional backgroundless stupid as we can imagine it. Archie-Poo is
Planck stupid, a quantum foam of stupid, a vacuum decay of stupid, a grand
unified theory of stupid.
Archie-Poo is the epitome of stupidity, the epiphany of stupid, the
apotheosis of stupidity. Archie-poo is stooopid."
>Moroney-- endless mockery, endless ad hominem-- never a kind word or praise=
> of anyone in science. From what sewer did they drag him out of?
Wrong, failure Plutonium. I love science! I hold scientists in very high
regard!
Of course, saying "it's true because I say so!" is certainly not science,
so you get left out. Too bad for you, but that's what happens when you
are a science failure and not a scientist.
Let's have another opinion. Hey, Uncle Al, what do you think of the
Plutonium Stupidity Theory as science?
"I cannot believe how incredibly stupid Archie-Poo is. I mean rock-hard
stupid. Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid. Surface of Venus
under 80 atmospheres of red hot carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid vapor
dehydrated for 300 million years rock-hard stupid. Stupid so stupid that
it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different sensorium of
stupid. Archie-Poo is trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid. Stupid so
collapsed upon itself that it is within its own Schwarzschild radius.
Black hole stupid. Stupid gotten so dense and massive that no intellect
can escape. Singularity stupid. Archie-Poo emits more stupid/second than
our entire galaxy otherwise emits stupid/year. Quasar stupid. Nothing
else in the universe can be this stupid. Archie-Poo is an oozingly
putrescent primordial fragment from the original Big Bang of Stupid, a
pure essence of stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond
the laws of physics that define maximally extrapolated hypergeometric
n-dimensional backgroundless stupid as we can imagine it. Archie-Poo is
Planck stupid, a quantum foam of stupid, a vacuum decay of stupid, a grand
unified theory of stupid.
Archie-Poo is the epitome of stupidity, the epiphany of stupid, the
apotheosis of stupidity. Archie-poo is stooopid."
Message has been deleted
Jan
Dec 12, 2018, 5:32:47 PM12/12/18
to
On Tuesday, October 30, 2018 at 5:10:40 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 23, 2018 at 10:24:48 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Autistic ssors.
You are describing yourself here. All you post is invective.
Do you think mathematics research is based on invective?
--
Jan
> On Tuesday, January 23, 2018 at 10:24:48 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Autistic ssors.
>
>
>
> Michael Moroney writes :
> Oct30, 1:49 PM (5 hours ago)
> Who are "we" and "us", Failure
>
> AP writes: 25 years of this stalking creep, never any math,
>
>
> Michael Moroney writes :
> Oct30, 1:49 PM (5 hours ago)
> Who are "we" and "us", Failure
>
You are describing yourself here. All you post is invective.
Do you think mathematics research is based on invective?
--
Jan
Michael Moroney
Dec 12, 2018, 10:16:51 PM12/12/18
to
>Michael Moroney writes:
>Dec 11 (16 hours ago)
>Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium fails:
never any science or math from the shithead Archimedes Plutonium, // just
26 years of attack dog cranking
>Dec 11 (16 hours ago)
>Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium fails:
never any science or math from the shithead Archimedes Plutonium, // just
26 years of attack dog cranking
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Michael Moroney
Dec 16, 2018, 11:21:16 PM12/16/18
to
Poor Archie. He has been asking me -- begging me -- to keep rating his
posts for failure. He even seems to be on the edge of another autism
meltdown, in fact.
Chattering Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails:
>Subject: Re: Moroney says Harvard physicists David Nelson, Kang Ni,
Hongkun Park, William Paul too stupid to understand AP's theory that true
real proton is 840MeV, electron=muon, in order for Angular Momentum to allow for Chemistry covalent bonding
>Moroney says MIT physicists Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee
>Grodzins too stupid to understand AP's theory that true real proton is
>840MeV, electron=muon, in order for Angular Momentum to allow for
>On Friday, December 14, 2018 at 2:04:46 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> Chattering Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails:
Weird how Plutonium asks me to calculate how much his posts fail, measured
in the unit of failure, the plutonium. But I'll oblige...
☑ Archie responds to criticism but refuses to discuss the issue...
☑ ...he would rather run away by trying to delete his posts...
☑ ...he actually believes deleting something on Google actually deletes it from Usenet...
☑ ...he considers attempts of actual discussion to be 'stalking'...
☐ ...Giggle Groups screenshot cut and pasted...
☑ ...with Archie's response posted in the wrong topic...
☑ ...with zero new content...
☑ ...and posted to the wrong newsgroup...
☑ ...multiple times...
☐ ...enough times to be classified as spam...
☑ ...in a topic/topics explicitly created by him for doing so...
☐ ...and Archie even whines about (other) spammers in his spam...
☐ ...with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test no one ever took...
☑ ...and the subject mentions totally uninvolved people...
☑ ...who are university math or physics professors...
☑ ...at a university supposedly near the person criticizing Archie...
☑ ...but Archie got the location (and university) completely wrong...
☐ ...and Archie demands they resign for not teaching his broken math...
☑ ...and he includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors...
☑ ...and STILL can't answer 'why post stalker lists of uninvolved profs'...
☑ ...maybe he thinks these professors do a Kibo and will respond here just by mentioning their names...
☑ ...even though those profs have never heard of him and never will...
☐ ...speaking of Kibo, mentions Kibo (how last century!)
☑ ...Archie's actual response is completely unrelated to the topic...
☑ ...and the critic's comment has embarrassing (to AP) portion removed...
☑ ...to the extent the comment is no longer recognizable...
☐ ...includes random snippets by other critics, spammers or babblers...
☐ ...which are attributed to yet other critics, spammers or babblers...
☐ ...followed by yet another repost of the "12 Failures of Plutonium"...
☐ ...actually claims that anyone who believe the ellipse is a conic section is stupid...
☐ ...followed by yet another repost of his long-discredited ellipse/conic section non-proof...
☐ ...or the "you gotta draw pictures of calculus" repost...
☑ ...and includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing...
☑ ...and includes the dumb ascii art whateevr that thing is...
☑ ...as well as ascii art of Archie's butthole...
☑ ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s...
☐ ...and Archie still can't answer Dan C's easy 4 question math test...
☐ ...and Archie brings up a "mistake" (in his view) from months ago...
☐ ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake...
☑ ...and Archie invents yet more "mistakes" (that are not mistakes)...
☐ ...and Archie really wears out the "a beer short of a 6 pack" joke...
☑ ...but he still doesn't realize he's about 5 beers short...
☑ Archie says something really dumb and stoopid, but realizes how dumb it is, so he accuses another poster of saying it...
☐ Archie doesn't know the definition of "racism", so calls anyone who points out all the flaws in his claims are "racist"...
☑ Archie roots for cockroaches in the Law of the Jungle...
☐ Archie can't tell the difference between Boolean AND/OR and arithmetic addition/subtraction...
☐ Archie outsmarted by someone too stupid to come out of the rain AGAIN...
☐ Archie thinks he is the very first person in the history of the world to disbelieve in negative and imaginary numbers...
☐ ...and demands credit from anyone else who also disbelieves in them...
☐ Archie whines about iPhone's self-protection feature rather than heat his trailer in the winter...
☐ ...and Archie can't get over the shame of messing up percentages...
☐ ...and Archie is envious that I weighed the electron and he didn't...
☐ ...Archie asks Google Groups to do something they can't do...
☑ ...Google Groups poster. 'Nuf said.
☑ ...because he's too stoopid to configure a newsreader with killfile...
The Failure Score of Archie's post: 30 plutoniums!
(The plutonium is the new SI unit of failure)
That more what I expect from him.
posts for failure. He even seems to be on the edge of another autism
meltdown, in fact.
Chattering Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails:
>Subject: Re: Moroney says Harvard physicists David Nelson, Kang Ni,
Hongkun Park, William Paul too stupid to understand AP's theory that true
real proton is 840MeV, electron=muon, in order for Angular Momentum to allow for Chemistry covalent bonding
>Moroney says MIT physicists Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee
>Grodzins too stupid to understand AP's theory that true real proton is
>840MeV, electron=muon, in order for Angular Momentum to allow for
>On Friday, December 14, 2018 at 2:04:46 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> Chattering Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails:
Weird how Plutonium asks me to calculate how much his posts fail, measured
in the unit of failure, the plutonium. But I'll oblige...
☑ Archie responds to criticism but refuses to discuss the issue...
☑ ...he would rather run away by trying to delete his posts...
☑ ...he actually believes deleting something on Google actually deletes it from Usenet...
☑ ...he considers attempts of actual discussion to be 'stalking'...
☐ ...Giggle Groups screenshot cut and pasted...
☑ ...with Archie's response posted in the wrong topic...
☑ ...with zero new content...
☑ ...and posted to the wrong newsgroup...
☑ ...multiple times...
☐ ...enough times to be classified as spam...
☑ ...in a topic/topics explicitly created by him for doing so...
☐ ...and Archie even whines about (other) spammers in his spam...
☐ ...with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test no one ever took...
☑ ...and the subject mentions totally uninvolved people...
☑ ...who are university math or physics professors...
☑ ...at a university supposedly near the person criticizing Archie...
☑ ...but Archie got the location (and university) completely wrong...
☐ ...and Archie demands they resign for not teaching his broken math...
☑ ...and he includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors...
☑ ...and STILL can't answer 'why post stalker lists of uninvolved profs'...
☑ ...maybe he thinks these professors do a Kibo and will respond here just by mentioning their names...
☑ ...even though those profs have never heard of him and never will...
☐ ...speaking of Kibo, mentions Kibo (how last century!)
☑ ...Archie's actual response is completely unrelated to the topic...
☑ ...and the critic's comment has embarrassing (to AP) portion removed...
☑ ...to the extent the comment is no longer recognizable...
☐ ...includes random snippets by other critics, spammers or babblers...
☐ ...which are attributed to yet other critics, spammers or babblers...
☐ ...followed by yet another repost of the "12 Failures of Plutonium"...
☐ ...actually claims that anyone who believe the ellipse is a conic section is stupid...
☐ ...followed by yet another repost of his long-discredited ellipse/conic section non-proof...
☐ ...or the "you gotta draw pictures of calculus" repost...
☑ ...and includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing...
☑ ...and includes the dumb ascii art whateevr that thing is...
☑ ...as well as ascii art of Archie's butthole...
☑ ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s...
☐ ...and Archie still can't answer Dan C's easy 4 question math test...
☐ ...and Archie brings up a "mistake" (in his view) from months ago...
☐ ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake...
☑ ...and Archie invents yet more "mistakes" (that are not mistakes)...
☐ ...and Archie really wears out the "a beer short of a 6 pack" joke...
☑ ...but he still doesn't realize he's about 5 beers short...
☑ Archie says something really dumb and stoopid, but realizes how dumb it is, so he accuses another poster of saying it...
☐ Archie doesn't know the definition of "racism", so calls anyone who points out all the flaws in his claims are "racist"...
☑ Archie roots for cockroaches in the Law of the Jungle...
☐ Archie can't tell the difference between Boolean AND/OR and arithmetic addition/subtraction...
☐ Archie outsmarted by someone too stupid to come out of the rain AGAIN...
☐ Archie thinks he is the very first person in the history of the world to disbelieve in negative and imaginary numbers...
☐ ...and demands credit from anyone else who also disbelieves in them...
☐ Archie whines about iPhone's self-protection feature rather than heat his trailer in the winter...
☐ ...and Archie can't get over the shame of messing up percentages...
☐ ...and Archie is envious that I weighed the electron and he didn't...
☐ ...Archie asks Google Groups to do something they can't do...
☑ ...Google Groups poster. 'Nuf said.
☑ ...because he's too stoopid to configure a newsreader with killfile...
The Failure Score of Archie's post: 30 plutoniums!
(The plutonium is the new SI unit of failure)
That more what I expect from him.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Michael Moroney
Mar 1, 2019, 6:07:00 PM3/1/19
to
AlzheimerPlutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>>Autistic Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math:
MM writes: never any math, never any physics from Moroney, only stalk
stalk hatred for 26 years
x-no-archive: yes
>>Autistic Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math:
MM writes: never any math, never any physics from Moroney, only stalk
stalk hatred for 26 years
x-no-archive: yes
Michael Moroney
Mar 1, 2019, 6:10:21 PM3/1/19
to
AlzheimerPlutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>>Autistic Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math:
MM writes: never any math, never any physics from Plutonium, only stalk
>>Autistic Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math:
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Michael Moroney
Mar 23, 2019, 2:01:00 PM3/23/19
to
AutisticPlutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>AP writes: 26 years of posts of Moroney and all they amount to is the above,
Hey, you're the one who after 26 years is posting ascii art buttholes!
>no wonder Harvard kicked out Moroney as a moron tramp
You're projecting again, Dartmouth College fired your ass for posting
stupid crap like your Plutonium Atom Stupidity under their name!
x-no-archive: yes
>AP writes: 26 years of posts of Moroney and all they amount to is the above,
Hey, you're the one who after 26 years is posting ascii art buttholes!
>no wonder Harvard kicked out Moroney as a moron tramp
You're projecting again, Dartmouth College fired your ass for posting
stupid crap like your Plutonium Atom Stupidity under their name!
x-no-archive: yes
Message has been deleted
Michael Moroney
Apr 6, 2019, 4:04:30 PM4/6/19
to
>Donald Schwendeman, Rensselaer Polytechnic,Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw,
>Isom Herron, James Parry (kibo), is the reason RPI failed ellipse is like
>Kibo fails with 938 is 12% short of 945
>On Saturday, April 6, 2019 at 2:29:51 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> AutisticPlutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>AP writes: maybe Dr. Tao sees the ellipse as just another kibo Parry joke
Did you say ellipse, Failure Plutonium? Here you are!!
Some preliminaries:
Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
in the proof:
^ x
|
-+- <= x=h
.' | `.
. | .
| | |
' | '
`. | .'
y <----------+ <= x=0
Cone (side view):
.
/|\
/ | \
/b | \
/---+---' <= x = h
/ |' \
/ ' | \
/ ' | \
x = 0 => '-------+-------\
/ a | \
Proof:
r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence
y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.
Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1 ...equation of an ellipse
qed
x-no-archive: yes
>Isom Herron, James Parry (kibo), is the reason RPI failed ellipse is like
>Kibo fails with 938 is 12% short of 945
>On Saturday, April 6, 2019 at 2:29:51 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> AutisticPlutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
Did you say ellipse, Failure Plutonium? Here you are!!
Some preliminaries:
Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
in the proof:
^ x
|
-+- <= x=h
.' | `.
. | .
| | |
' | '
`. | .'
y <----------+ <= x=0
Cone (side view):
.
/|\
/ | \
/b | \
/---+---' <= x = h
/ |' \
/ ' | \
/ ' | \
x = 0 => '-------+-------\
/ a | \
Proof:
r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence
y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.
Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1 ...equation of an ellipse
qed
x-no-archive: yes
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Michael Moroney
Jun 2, 2019, 11:03:14 PM6/2/19
to
Physics Minnow Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails:
>Subject: Re: Physics little-fishes_John Baez,Brian Greene,Lisa Randall,Alan H. Guth,Michael E. Brown Konstantin Batygin, is kibo Moroney spam the reason you not yet confirmed real proton is 840MeV, real electron=105MeV and .5MeV was Dirac's magnetic monopole
>Physics little-fishes_John Baez,Brian Greene,Lisa Randall,Alan H. Guth,Michael E. Brown
>Konstantin Batygin, is kibo Moroney spam the reason you not yet confirmed real
>On Sunday, June 2, 2019 at 9:31:55 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>>Did you know that 10 AND 4 = 0? Wrap your little brain around that!
You didn't know that, Failure Plutonium? How come even your hero, George Boole, too
stoopid to even come in out of the rain, knew that?
BTW how did you manage to survive yet another South Dakota winter with less
brains than Boole??
>On Sunday, June 2, 2019 at 9:28:56 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails:
>On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 9:00:54 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> AutisticPlutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>On Wednesday, May 29, 2019 at 7:26:39 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> AutisticPlutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
You sure like repeating me!
>AP Atom Model replacing the Rutherford-Bohr Atom Model (Physics series for
>High School Book 1) Kindle Edition
>by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>Be the first to review this item
WARNING TO PARENTS: Archimedes Plutonium is offering to teach your children
his broken physics and math. BEWARE! He will corrupt the minds of your
children! He teaches bizarre false physics, that there are no negative
numbers, no complex numbers, that a sine wave isn't a sine wave plus many,
many other instances of bad math and physics.
He has previously tried to corrupt our youth by posting his books on Usenet.
Fortunately, this has failed so far, perhaps in part due to the fact Usenet
is an old, dying medium few students even know of, much less use. However, Mr.
Plutonium has somehow duped Amazon into providing his dangerous books for free
on Kindle. This has greatly increased the risk to our students!
One of his dangerous tricks is to teach false Boolean logic such as
3 AND 2 = 5. His method at doing this is particularly insidious. He'll
post a false statement that nobody believes, such as 3 OR 2 = 5, say that
it is false, but then he'll try to replace it with another similar false
statement such as 3 AND 2 = 5, in order to really confuse future computer
scientists. It is important for future computer scientists to remember that
in the bitwise Boolean logic used by computers, 3 OR 2 = 3 and 3 AND 2 = 2.
Don't let Plutonium's bad logic confuse you!
Nobody knows why he wishes to corrupt the minds of children like this.
Perhaps he wants everyone to be a failure at math and physics, just like he
is. Perhaps he is an agent of Putin and Russia, or maybe of China, in order
to make sure they will continue to dominate the trade economy. Maybe he is a
minion of Kim Jong Un of North Korea. But the point is, stay away, if he
offers to give or sell you his dangerous book. Especially now since they are
available for free from otherwise legitimate Amazon.
In addition, Plutonium wants to usurp good Christians by trying to convince
students to worship his evil pagan Plutonium atom god. You can recognize
the symbol of this evil pagan cult, which is an ascii-art cosmic butthole.
>Subject: Re: Physics little-fishes_John Baez,Brian Greene,Lisa Randall,Alan H. Guth,Michael E. Brown Konstantin Batygin, is kibo Moroney spam the reason you not yet confirmed real proton is 840MeV, real electron=105MeV and .5MeV was Dirac's magnetic monopole
>Physics little-fishes_John Baez,Brian Greene,Lisa Randall,Alan H. Guth,Michael E. Brown
>Konstantin Batygin, is kibo Moroney spam the reason you not yet confirmed real
>On Sunday, June 2, 2019 at 9:31:55 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>>Did you know that 10 AND 4 = 0? Wrap your little brain around that!
You didn't know that, Failure Plutonium? How come even your hero, George Boole, too
stoopid to even come in out of the rain, knew that?
BTW how did you manage to survive yet another South Dakota winter with less
brains than Boole??
>On Sunday, June 2, 2019 at 9:28:56 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails:
>On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 9:00:54 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> AutisticPlutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 9:00:50 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> AutisticPlutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>> AutisticPlutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 6:08:10 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> AutisticPlutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>> AutisticPlutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>On Tuesday, May 28, 2019 at 5:04:17 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> AutisticPlutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>> WARNING TO PARENTS:
>> AutisticPlutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>On Wednesday, May 29, 2019 at 7:26:39 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> AutisticPlutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>AP Atom Model replacing the Rutherford-Bohr Atom Model (Physics series for
>High School Book 1) Kindle Edition
>by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>Be the first to review this item
WARNING TO PARENTS: Archimedes Plutonium is offering to teach your children
his broken physics and math. BEWARE! He will corrupt the minds of your
children! He teaches bizarre false physics, that there are no negative
numbers, no complex numbers, that a sine wave isn't a sine wave plus many,
many other instances of bad math and physics.
He has previously tried to corrupt our youth by posting his books on Usenet.
Fortunately, this has failed so far, perhaps in part due to the fact Usenet
is an old, dying medium few students even know of, much less use. However, Mr.
Plutonium has somehow duped Amazon into providing his dangerous books for free
on Kindle. This has greatly increased the risk to our students!
One of his dangerous tricks is to teach false Boolean logic such as
3 AND 2 = 5. His method at doing this is particularly insidious. He'll
post a false statement that nobody believes, such as 3 OR 2 = 5, say that
it is false, but then he'll try to replace it with another similar false
statement such as 3 AND 2 = 5, in order to really confuse future computer
scientists. It is important for future computer scientists to remember that
in the bitwise Boolean logic used by computers, 3 OR 2 = 3 and 3 AND 2 = 2.
Don't let Plutonium's bad logic confuse you!
Nobody knows why he wishes to corrupt the minds of children like this.
Perhaps he wants everyone to be a failure at math and physics, just like he
is. Perhaps he is an agent of Putin and Russia, or maybe of China, in order
to make sure they will continue to dominate the trade economy. Maybe he is a
minion of Kim Jong Un of North Korea. But the point is, stay away, if he
offers to give or sell you his dangerous book. Especially now since they are
available for free from otherwise legitimate Amazon.
In addition, Plutonium wants to usurp good Christians by trying to convince
students to worship his evil pagan Plutonium atom god. You can recognize
the symbol of this evil pagan cult, which is an ascii-art cosmic butthole.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Earle Jones
Jun 7, 2019, 9:17:49 PM6/7/19
to
On 2019-06-07 22:13:55 +0000, Archimedes Plutonium said:
> On Tuesday, January 23, 2018 at 10:24:48 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> Autistic
> On Friday, June 7, 2019 at 11:14:38 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> not bother with a
>> review since they didn't lose any money by buying them.
>
>
> AP writes: wrong, kibo Parry Moroney 27 year stalker. I think some of
> those Harvard students pay upwards of $50,000 per year to attend
> Harvard. And a review of math and physics professors of Harvard would
> uncover the fact that all can't walk straight while chewing gum
> For all of them are saying:
> 1) 10 OR 4 = 14 when even the village idiots of Boston know it is 10
> AND 4 = 14 (see AP Kindle book)
> 2) ellipse was never a conic, see the AP Kindle book proof
> 3) Since they all failed in 1 and 2 above, no Harvard math or physics
> professor understands that 9 x 105MeV for 9 x muon is less than 1% of
> 938 for proton, meaning the proton is really 840MeV
> Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors
Here is a basic intelligence test for AP:
You are standing outside and it begins to rain.
Q: What do you do?
earle
*
> On Tuesday, January 23, 2018 at 10:24:48 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> Autistic
> On Friday, June 7, 2019 at 11:14:38 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> not bother with a
>> review since they didn't lose any money by buying them.
>
>
> AP writes: wrong, kibo Parry Moroney 27 year stalker. I think some of
> those Harvard students pay upwards of $50,000 per year to attend
> Harvard. And a review of math and physics professors of Harvard would
> uncover the fact that all can't walk straight while chewing gum
> For all of them are saying:
> 1) 10 OR 4 = 14 when even the village idiots of Boston know it is 10
> AND 4 = 14 (see AP Kindle book)
> 2) ellipse was never a conic, see the AP Kindle book proof
> 3) Since they all failed in 1 and 2 above, no Harvard math or physics
> professor understands that 9 x 105MeV for 9 x muon is less than 1% of
> 938 for proton, meaning the proton is really 840MeV
> Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors
> Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> Be the first to review this item
*
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> Be the first to review this item
Here is a basic intelligence test for AP:
You are standing outside and it begins to rain.
Q: What do you do?
earle
*
Message has been deleted
Michael Moroney
Jun 8, 2019, 3:06:00 PM6/8/19
to
Earle Jones <earle...@icloud.com> writes:
>*
>Here is a basic intelligence test for AP:
> You are standing outside and it begins to rain.
>Q: What do you do?
This relates to a huge puzzle. George Boole, inventor of Boolean logic, was too
>*
>Here is a basic intelligence test for AP:
> You are standing outside and it begins to rain.
>Q: What do you do?
stupid to come in out of the rain, and died as a result. Plutonium isn't even as
smart as Boole, he can't even understand Boolean logic. Yet Plutonium has somehow
survived nearly 70 years of South Dakota and New Hampshire winters. How has he
managed to do that?
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Michael Moroney
Aug 17, 2019, 1:17:53 PM8/17/19
to
>About Sam spam-- churning of sci.math
About Plutonium spam-- being #1 Front Page Hog.
About Plutonium spam-- being #1 Front Page Hog.
Transfinite Numbers
Aug 18, 2019, 12:24:17 PM8/18/19
to
Archimedes Plutonium should be thrown in jail
for his willful criminal behavior. The criminal
Archimedes Plutonium all the times posts people
name lists together with hate speach about these people.
It is highly likely Archimedes Plutonium is
psycho. Archimedes Plutonium belongs in prison not
on usenet for his mind is complete hate hate hate.
Put the creep in jail and throw away the keys.
On Thursday, June 13, 2019 at 4:43:01 PM UTC+2, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Thursday, June 13, 2019 at 9:04:29 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Autistic
>
> Harvard's_Lisa Randall, Matthew Reece, Subir Sachdev, Aravinthan Samuel, Matthew Schwartz, Irwin Shapiro, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938
>
> MIT's_Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter, James Young, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938
>
> Princeton's_Peter Constantin, John Conway, Mihalis Dafermos, Gabriele Di Cerbo, Zeev Dvir, Weinan E, Charles Fefferman,too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938
> > Physics minnow
> > WARNING TO ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING STUDENTS:
>
>
> AP writes: Unpacking Moroney, suggests the reason Harvard-MIT is too dumb to see that 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV and the proton is clocked in at 938MeV with only a less than 1% sigma error, implies the real proton is 840MeV with a muon = real electron attached. Since none at MIT-Harvard could ever understand AP's proof ellipse is never a conic section (for that is the oval,not the ellipse) but rather the ellipse is a cylinder section; stands to reason they are far far too stupid at Harvard-MIT to see real proton is 840MeV.
>
> On Tuesday, June 4, 2019 at 8:46:33 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >
> > What, your slow motion autism meltdown
>
> On Monday, June 3, 2019 at 12:11:43 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > I always knew you were dumb and stoopid, but I never thought you would be
> > dumb and stoopid enough to threaten violence.
>
>
> On Sunday, June 2, 2019 at 10:03:14 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Physics Minnow
>
> On Tuesday, May 28, 2019 at 5:04:17 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Autistic
> >
> > WARNING TO PARENTS:
>
> why does not Baez, totally worthless in science, just change his name to abu Re: 1kicking out stalkers-- Jan Burse, Dan Christensen, John Baez //
>
> On Monday, April 3, 2017 at 9:30:35 PM UTC-5, abu.ku...@gmail.com wrote:
> > blow it out your ass ... oh,
> > what was that smell, in the first place
> >
>
> abu.ku...@gmail.com
>
> 4/5/17
>
>
> stalkers out kciking cans
>
> yup, complex field is tres c00l
>
> > Only if you failed Calculus would you think that
>
> nanadittos ... when you ever have any result
> from ye olde mathe, I'm sure that it will be new -- to you
>
>
> AP writes: instead of spamming newsgroups, why not do something worthwhile-- Confirm real electron is 105MeV, real proton is 840MeV and that little particle JJ Thomson discovered in 1897 turns out to be not the atom electron but rather the Dirac magnetic monopole.
>
>
> AP writes: Is the reason Physicists have not yet confirmed real proton is 840MeV not 938, because its scientists behave much like stalker kibo Parry Moroney-- cesspool mind of hatred with daily hate sheets on people rather than spend their daily activity on uncovering the true proton is 840MeV stuck with the real electron as muon doing a Faraday Law dance inside the atom making electricity and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole.
>
>
> o-:^>___?
> `~~c--^c'
> Navy dog says: remember the time the failed engineer kibo Parry Moroney said 938 is short of 945 by 12%. How could any engineer pass school not knowing percentages?
>
> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
>
>
>
> AP Atom Model replacing the Rutherford-Bohr Atom Model (Physics series for High School Book 1) Kindle Edition
>
>
> See all formats and editions
> • Kindle
> • $0.00 Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 1 million more titles $3.00 to buy
>
>
> The Rutherford and Bohr model of the Atom is seen now as fake physics. And it will take a lot of time before that nonsense is removed and replaced in science textbooks and classrooms for a truer model of the Atom. So to accelerate that movement towards the truth of what the Atom is, I present this short book for High School. In the age of the Internet, when we discover true science but am teaching fake science, we need a process to quicken the exit of fake science. Not to wait around for 50 years to be teaching the true science, we should be teaching the true science as fast as possible and to remove the fake science in our school curriculums in a timely and orderly manner. So this small book is a pattern for future removal of fake science from school curriculums. This small book explains what the Rutherford-Bohr model was and why it was phony science. And I explain what replaces the Rutherford-Bohr model with the AP model of the Atom. So the pattern is -- show both -- and then authors of texts will eliminate the fake science until it is a passing footnote.
>
> Cover Picture is a coil and a bar magnet and a galvanometer that measures the current produced as the bar magnet is thrust through the coil. This is Faraday's Law and needs to be taught in High School.
>
>
>
> Read less
>
>
> Length: 12 pages
> Word Wise: Enabled
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> Page Flip: Enabled
> Mat
>
>
> Product details
> File Size: 2207 KB
> Print Length: 12 pages
> Publication Date: April 10, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07QKHRWG8
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> X-Ray: Not Enabled 
> Word Wise: Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported 
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #220,321 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> #39 in General Chemistry & Reference
> #381 in General Chemistry
>
> Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
>
>
>
> How the Sun and Stars truly shine, not by fusion, but by Faraday's Law (Physics series for High School Book 2) Kindle Edition
> •
> •
> •
> •
> • See all formats and editions
> • Kindle
> • $0.00 Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 1 million more titles $3.00 to buy
> One of my recent books (published a few days ago) was the AP model of the interior of atoms replacing the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom. And the differences are vast between these two atom models, for the AP model has the Faraday law going on, with actual work and job for the subatomic particles. And in that Atom model book, I was complaining that our modern science education school system has no good way of ridding itself of fake science where we keep on teaching propaganda and fake science for as much as 50 years beyond the discovery of what the true underlying science actually is. I gave as an example the Wegener Continental Drift theory in geology, where students had to suffer 50 years of a fake static-earth-theory when the Continental Drift theory was all around. One of the reasons for the delay in teaching the truth of science, is there is so much money interests involved of people selling fake science textbooks. And this is where the Internet can come in and play a vital role in school education, because the Internet can publish books of "true science" and get them exposed to a world audience, and so fake science like the static-earth theory would have been gone long before 50 years had elapsed if the internet were present for Wegener.
>
> But now an even bigger and more important theory of science and physics is here and threatens to throw out as fake science the fusion theory of star energy, especially since it is "How the Sun shines". In effect, the question is, how do all stars shine? What is their energy source. And hard to believe that this topic in current science education with their explanation as "being fusion" is fake science. We all know what the answer is from present day science-- that stars and sun shine because of fusion. That they fuse hydrogen and light elements to make heavier elements like helium and in that fusion they give off energy which is sunshine. But is it true? Is that true science. You would be surprised to find out, that such is not the truth of how stars and Sun shine. They do not shine because of fusion. They shine because the Faraday law is going on inside each and every atom in that star or the Sun.
>
> Now, here is another science teaching that needs to replace the fake science of fusion for the Sun and stars. And it should not take 50 years like Wegener's continental drift to push out the fake static earth theory. We should not have to wait 50 years for our teachers to teach the truth about how the stars and Sun shine with energy. And so, here again, just as in the previous book "AP's model of the Atom", I present the old theory of how stars shine and alongside that old fake theory, I present the new true theory. And in that presentation, we can give the entire science education community, give them about say 5 years of time in which to completely remove the old fake theory that fusion causes stars and Sun to shine with energy. When in fact, the truth is, Faraday Law causes stars and the Sun to shine.
>
> Cover Picture is my photograph of a Google search on my computer of Sun images.
>
> Read less
>
>
> Length: 14 pages
> Word Wise: Enabled
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> Page Flip: Enabled
> Matchbook Price: $0.99 What's this?
>
> File Size: 1629 KB
> Print Length: 14 pages
> Publication Date: April 12, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07QRPZQ4Q
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> X-Ray: Not Enabled 
> Word Wise: Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported 
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
>
> Would you like to tell us about a lower price?
>
> World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Kindle Edition
> • Kindle
> • $0.00 Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 1 million more titles $5.00 to buy
>
> Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math where they had a ill-defined infinity; they had the fakery of Limit concept; and they had the fakery of a continuum.
>
> The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus basically says the integral is inverse to the derivative and the derivative is inverse to the integral. By inverse is meant that you can go to one given the other and vice versa, such as add is the inverse of subtract, so if we had 10 + 4 = 14 then the inverse is subtract 4 and we have 14-4 = 10 back to 10 where we started from. And the geometry proof involves a rectangle and a right triangle hinged atop a trapezoid. You hinge it one direction you have dy*dx for area of a rectangle for integral area. You hinge it the other direction you have the dy/dx for slope or derivative from the trapezoid formed.
>
> Sad that Old Math was so full of ill-defined concepts and fake concepts that never was a geometry proof of FTC ever possible in Old Math.
>
> Length: 29 pages
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> Page Flip: Enabled
>
> File Size: 1224 KB
> Print Length: 29 pages
> Publication Date: March 14, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07PQTNHMY
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> X-Ray: Not Enabled 
> Word Wise: Not Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported 
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #293,690 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #18 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> #70 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> #471 in Calculus (Books)
>
> Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> Archimedes Plutonium
>
> AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section Kindle Edition
> • Kindle
> • $0.00 Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 1 million more titles $3.00 to buy
>
> Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
>
> Length: 21 pages
>
> File Size: 1620 KB
> Print Length: 21 pages
> Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07PLSDQWC
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> X-Ray: Not Enabled 
> Word Wise: Not Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
>
> TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS (textbook in the making-- journal textbook): journal-textbook for ages 5 to 18, Volume 1; and ages 19 to 26, Volume 2 Kindle Edition
>
>
> See all formats and editions
> • Kindle
> • $0.00 Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 1 million more titles $9.99 to buy
>
> This is the one textbook in two volumes that carries every person through all his/her math education needs, 5 year old to 26 year old through all of mathematics that is needed to do science. Every other math book is incidental to this one. And the student needs this math book for all their math and science needs. A one-size-fits-all for mathematics study.
>
> I call it a journal-textbook because Amazon's Kindle offers me the ability to edit overnight, and to change the text, almost continuously. A unique first in education textbooks-- continual overnight editing.
>
> What prompted me to write this textbook is that the Old Math is too much filled with error, mistakes and just sheer nonsense. In the early 2000s I wrote about 5 editions of Correcting Math textbooks and about 9 editions of True Calculus, but then I got so fed up and tired with all the mistakes of Old Math, that I decided the best route to go is throw out all of Old Math and start anew.
>
> Now I wrestled with publishing a "rough first edition" now, or to wait about a year in polishing the textbook and then publish it. I wrestled with this and decided I have enough of a skeleton text, that I can continually polish with overnight editing, and that it would be of more benefit to readers to have this skeleton text and watch and wait as the months and years go by to see the continual polishing take affect. So I decided tonight to publish, for the benefit of many to see, rather than wait a year to see a polished text. I may have made a mistake in this decision for I do not want to turn off anyone to math. But maybe I made the correct decision to allow others to see this book a full year ahead of schedule. Bon Voyage!
>
> Length: 328 pages
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> Page Flip: Enabled
>
>
> File Size: 1968 KB
> Print Length: 328 pages
> Publication Date: May 2, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07RG7BVZW
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> X-Ray: Not Enabled 
> Word Wise: Not Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported 
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #274,398 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #27 in General Geometry
> #336 in Geometry & Topology (Books)
>
>
> Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, Atom Totality Series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> • Kindle
> • $0.00 Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 1 million more titles $9.99 to buy
>
> Cover picture: is what the interior and exterior of most atoms looks like once you apply Faraday's Law to subatomic particles.This picture is a coil of 88 rings torus with a smaller ring inside. The 88 coil rings represent 11 protons in a Faraday Law magnetic induction coil and the smaller ring is a muon as a bar magnet thrusting through the proton coil, thereby, producing electricity.
>
> The goal and aim of the 8th edition of Atom Totality, 2017 was to iron out all the mathematics of Electricity and Magnetism so that the AP-Maxwell Equations embodied all the mathematics of physics. In other words, all of physics is handled by the AP-Maxwell Equations. But in the course of straightening out the EM math of physics, I made my second greatest science discovery-- that the real proton was 840MeV, real electron was the muon at 105MeV and that little particle we all thought was the electron since JJ Thompson discovered it in 1897, was in fact not the electron but was Dirac's magnetic monopole. I made that discovery in the midst of my writing the 8th edition (only goes to show that most of our best ideas come from organizing and placing our thoughts into order-- writing a book). And so this 9th edition goal and aim is to go back and fix the picture of atoms, their geometry, and incorporate that discovery, mostly by fixing the picture of what atoms exterior and interior geometry is, in light of the fact that there is the Faraday Law going on inside of atoms.
>
> Length: 114 pages
> Word Wise: Enabled
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> Page Flip: Enabled
> Matchbook Price: $2.99 What's this?
>
>
> Product details
> File Size: 2354 KB
> Print Length: 115 pages
> Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
> Publication Date: June 10, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07SW87BF5
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> X-Ray: Not Enabled 
> Word Wise: Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported 
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #285,417 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #826 in Astronomy (Books)
> #166 in Astronomy (Kindle Store)
> #671 in Physics (Kindle Store)
>
>
>
>
> Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> Archimedes Plutonium
for his willful criminal behavior. The criminal
Archimedes Plutonium all the times posts people
name lists together with hate speach about these people.
It is highly likely Archimedes Plutonium is
psycho. Archimedes Plutonium belongs in prison not
on usenet for his mind is complete hate hate hate.
Put the creep in jail and throw away the keys.
On Thursday, June 13, 2019 at 4:43:01 PM UTC+2, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Thursday, June 13, 2019 at 9:04:29 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Autistic
>
> Harvard's_Lisa Randall, Matthew Reece, Subir Sachdev, Aravinthan Samuel, Matthew Schwartz, Irwin Shapiro, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938
>
> MIT's_Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter, James Young, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938
>
> Princeton's_Peter Constantin, John Conway, Mihalis Dafermos, Gabriele Di Cerbo, Zeev Dvir, Weinan E, Charles Fefferman,too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938
>
> On Wednesday, June 12, 2019 at 3:39:38 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Autistic
> On Wednesday, June 12, 2019 at 3:39:38 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Autistic
> On Wednesday, June 12, 2019 at 3:39:41 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Autistic
>
> On Friday, June 7, 2019 at 12:13:14 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Autistic
>
> > Physics minnow
> > WARNING TO ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING STUDENTS:
>
>
> AP writes: Unpacking Moroney, suggests the reason Harvard-MIT is too dumb to see that 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV and the proton is clocked in at 938MeV with only a less than 1% sigma error, implies the real proton is 840MeV with a muon = real electron attached. Since none at MIT-Harvard could ever understand AP's proof ellipse is never a conic section (for that is the oval,not the ellipse) but rather the ellipse is a cylinder section; stands to reason they are far far too stupid at Harvard-MIT to see real proton is 840MeV.
>
> On Tuesday, June 4, 2019 at 8:46:33 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >
> > What, your slow motion autism meltdown
>
> On Monday, June 3, 2019 at 12:11:43 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > I always knew you were dumb and stoopid, but I never thought you would be
> > dumb and stoopid enough to threaten violence.
>
>
> On Sunday, June 2, 2019 at 10:03:14 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Physics Minnow
>
> On Tuesday, May 28, 2019 at 5:04:17 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Autistic
> >
> > WARNING TO PARENTS:
>
> why does not Baez, totally worthless in science, just change his name to abu Re: 1kicking out stalkers-- Jan Burse, Dan Christensen, John Baez //
>
> On Monday, April 3, 2017 at 9:30:35 PM UTC-5, abu.ku...@gmail.com wrote:
> > blow it out your ass ... oh,
> > what was that smell, in the first place
> >
>
> abu.ku...@gmail.com
>
> 4/5/17
>
>
> stalkers out kciking cans
>
> yup, complex field is tres c00l
>
> > Only if you failed Calculus would you think that
>
> nanadittos ... when you ever have any result
> from ye olde mathe, I'm sure that it will be new -- to you
>
>
> AP writes: instead of spamming newsgroups, why not do something worthwhile-- Confirm real electron is 105MeV, real proton is 840MeV and that little particle JJ Thomson discovered in 1897 turns out to be not the atom electron but rather the Dirac magnetic monopole.
>
>
> AP writes: Is the reason Physicists have not yet confirmed real proton is 840MeV not 938, because its scientists behave much like stalker kibo Parry Moroney-- cesspool mind of hatred with daily hate sheets on people rather than spend their daily activity on uncovering the true proton is 840MeV stuck with the real electron as muon doing a Faraday Law dance inside the atom making electricity and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole.
>
>
> o-:^>___?
> `~~c--^c'
> Navy dog says: remember the time the failed engineer kibo Parry Moroney said 938 is short of 945 by 12%. How could any engineer pass school not knowing percentages?
>
> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
>
>
>
> AP Atom Model replacing the Rutherford-Bohr Atom Model (Physics series for High School Book 1) Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> Be the first to review this item
>
>
> #1 New Releasein General Chemistry & Reference
> Be the first to review this item
>
>
>
>
> See all formats and editions
> • Kindle
> • $0.00 Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 1 million more titles $3.00 to buy
>
>
> The Rutherford and Bohr model of the Atom is seen now as fake physics. And it will take a lot of time before that nonsense is removed and replaced in science textbooks and classrooms for a truer model of the Atom. So to accelerate that movement towards the truth of what the Atom is, I present this short book for High School. In the age of the Internet, when we discover true science but am teaching fake science, we need a process to quicken the exit of fake science. Not to wait around for 50 years to be teaching the true science, we should be teaching the true science as fast as possible and to remove the fake science in our school curriculums in a timely and orderly manner. So this small book is a pattern for future removal of fake science from school curriculums. This small book explains what the Rutherford-Bohr model was and why it was phony science. And I explain what replaces the Rutherford-Bohr model with the AP model of the Atom. So the pattern is -- show both -- and then authors of texts will eliminate the fake science until it is a passing footnote.
>
> Cover Picture is a coil and a bar magnet and a galvanometer that measures the current produced as the bar magnet is thrust through the coil. This is Faraday's Law and needs to be taught in High School.
>
>
>
> Read less
>
>
> Length: 12 pages
> Word Wise: Enabled
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> Page Flip: Enabled
> Mat
>
>
> Product details
> File Size: 2207 KB
> Print Length: 12 pages
> Publication Date: April 10, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07QKHRWG8
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> X-Ray: Not Enabled 
> Word Wise: Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported 
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #220,321 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> #39 in General Chemistry & Reference
> #381 in General Chemistry
>
> Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
>
>
>
> How the Sun and Stars truly shine, not by fusion, but by Faraday's Law (Physics series for High School Book 2) Kindle Edition
> • by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> • Be the first to review this item
> •
> • Be the first to review this item
> •
> •
> •
> •
> • See all formats and editions
> • Kindle
> • $0.00 Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 1 million more titles $3.00 to buy
> One of my recent books (published a few days ago) was the AP model of the interior of atoms replacing the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom. And the differences are vast between these two atom models, for the AP model has the Faraday law going on, with actual work and job for the subatomic particles. And in that Atom model book, I was complaining that our modern science education school system has no good way of ridding itself of fake science where we keep on teaching propaganda and fake science for as much as 50 years beyond the discovery of what the true underlying science actually is. I gave as an example the Wegener Continental Drift theory in geology, where students had to suffer 50 years of a fake static-earth-theory when the Continental Drift theory was all around. One of the reasons for the delay in teaching the truth of science, is there is so much money interests involved of people selling fake science textbooks. And this is where the Internet can come in and play a vital role in school education, because the Internet can publish books of "true science" and get them exposed to a world audience, and so fake science like the static-earth theory would have been gone long before 50 years had elapsed if the internet were present for Wegener.
>
> But now an even bigger and more important theory of science and physics is here and threatens to throw out as fake science the fusion theory of star energy, especially since it is "How the Sun shines". In effect, the question is, how do all stars shine? What is their energy source. And hard to believe that this topic in current science education with their explanation as "being fusion" is fake science. We all know what the answer is from present day science-- that stars and sun shine because of fusion. That they fuse hydrogen and light elements to make heavier elements like helium and in that fusion they give off energy which is sunshine. But is it true? Is that true science. You would be surprised to find out, that such is not the truth of how stars and Sun shine. They do not shine because of fusion. They shine because the Faraday law is going on inside each and every atom in that star or the Sun.
>
> Now, here is another science teaching that needs to replace the fake science of fusion for the Sun and stars. And it should not take 50 years like Wegener's continental drift to push out the fake static earth theory. We should not have to wait 50 years for our teachers to teach the truth about how the stars and Sun shine with energy. And so, here again, just as in the previous book "AP's model of the Atom", I present the old theory of how stars shine and alongside that old fake theory, I present the new true theory. And in that presentation, we can give the entire science education community, give them about say 5 years of time in which to completely remove the old fake theory that fusion causes stars and Sun to shine with energy. When in fact, the truth is, Faraday Law causes stars and the Sun to shine.
>
> Cover Picture is my photograph of a Google search on my computer of Sun images.
>
> Read less
>
>
> Length: 14 pages
> Word Wise: Enabled
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> Page Flip: Enabled
> Matchbook Price: $0.99 What's this?
>
> File Size: 1629 KB
> Print Length: 14 pages
> Publication Date: April 12, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07QRPZQ4Q
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> X-Ray: Not Enabled 
> Word Wise: Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported 
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
>
> Would you like to tell us about a lower price?
>
> World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> Be the first to review this item
>
>
>
>
>
> See all formats and editions
> Be the first to review this item
>
>
>
>
>
> • Kindle
> • $0.00 Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 1 million more titles $5.00 to buy
>
> Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math where they had a ill-defined infinity; they had the fakery of Limit concept; and they had the fakery of a continuum.
>
> The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus basically says the integral is inverse to the derivative and the derivative is inverse to the integral. By inverse is meant that you can go to one given the other and vice versa, such as add is the inverse of subtract, so if we had 10 + 4 = 14 then the inverse is subtract 4 and we have 14-4 = 10 back to 10 where we started from. And the geometry proof involves a rectangle and a right triangle hinged atop a trapezoid. You hinge it one direction you have dy*dx for area of a rectangle for integral area. You hinge it the other direction you have the dy/dx for slope or derivative from the trapezoid formed.
>
> Sad that Old Math was so full of ill-defined concepts and fake concepts that never was a geometry proof of FTC ever possible in Old Math.
>
> Length: 29 pages
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> Page Flip: Enabled
>
> File Size: 1224 KB
> Print Length: 29 pages
> Publication Date: March 14, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07PQTNHMY
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> X-Ray: Not Enabled 
> Word Wise: Not Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported 
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #293,690 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #18 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> #70 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> #471 in Calculus (Books)
>
> Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> Archimedes Plutonium
>
> AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> Be the first to review this item
>
>
>
>
>
> See all formats and editions
> Be the first to review this item
>
>
>
>
>
> • Kindle
> • $0.00 Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 1 million more titles $3.00 to buy
>
> Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
>
> Length: 21 pages
>
> File Size: 1620 KB
> Print Length: 21 pages
> Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07PLSDQWC
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> X-Ray: Not Enabled 
> Word Wise: Not Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
>
> TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS (textbook in the making-- journal textbook): journal-textbook for ages 5 to 18, Volume 1; and ages 19 to 26, Volume 2 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> Be the first to review this item
>
>
> #1 New Releasein General Geometry
> Be the first to review this item
>
>
>
>
> See all formats and editions
> • Kindle
> • $0.00 Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 1 million more titles $9.99 to buy
>
> This is the one textbook in two volumes that carries every person through all his/her math education needs, 5 year old to 26 year old through all of mathematics that is needed to do science. Every other math book is incidental to this one. And the student needs this math book for all their math and science needs. A one-size-fits-all for mathematics study.
>
> I call it a journal-textbook because Amazon's Kindle offers me the ability to edit overnight, and to change the text, almost continuously. A unique first in education textbooks-- continual overnight editing.
>
> What prompted me to write this textbook is that the Old Math is too much filled with error, mistakes and just sheer nonsense. In the early 2000s I wrote about 5 editions of Correcting Math textbooks and about 9 editions of True Calculus, but then I got so fed up and tired with all the mistakes of Old Math, that I decided the best route to go is throw out all of Old Math and start anew.
>
> Now I wrestled with publishing a "rough first edition" now, or to wait about a year in polishing the textbook and then publish it. I wrestled with this and decided I have enough of a skeleton text, that I can continually polish with overnight editing, and that it would be of more benefit to readers to have this skeleton text and watch and wait as the months and years go by to see the continual polishing take affect. So I decided tonight to publish, for the benefit of many to see, rather than wait a year to see a polished text. I may have made a mistake in this decision for I do not want to turn off anyone to math. But maybe I made the correct decision to allow others to see this book a full year ahead of schedule. Bon Voyage!
>
> Length: 328 pages
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> Page Flip: Enabled
>
>
> File Size: 1968 KB
> Print Length: 328 pages
> Publication Date: May 2, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07RG7BVZW
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> X-Ray: Not Enabled 
> Word Wise: Not Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported 
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #274,398 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #27 in General Geometry
> #336 in Geometry & Topology (Books)
>
>
> Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, Atom Totality Series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> Be the first to review this item
>
>
>
>
>
> See all formats and editions
> Be the first to review this item
>
>
>
>
>
> • Kindle
> • $0.00 Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 1 million more titles $9.99 to buy
>
> Cover picture: is what the interior and exterior of most atoms looks like once you apply Faraday's Law to subatomic particles.This picture is a coil of 88 rings torus with a smaller ring inside. The 88 coil rings represent 11 protons in a Faraday Law magnetic induction coil and the smaller ring is a muon as a bar magnet thrusting through the proton coil, thereby, producing electricity.
>
> The goal and aim of the 8th edition of Atom Totality, 2017 was to iron out all the mathematics of Electricity and Magnetism so that the AP-Maxwell Equations embodied all the mathematics of physics. In other words, all of physics is handled by the AP-Maxwell Equations. But in the course of straightening out the EM math of physics, I made my second greatest science discovery-- that the real proton was 840MeV, real electron was the muon at 105MeV and that little particle we all thought was the electron since JJ Thompson discovered it in 1897, was in fact not the electron but was Dirac's magnetic monopole. I made that discovery in the midst of my writing the 8th edition (only goes to show that most of our best ideas come from organizing and placing our thoughts into order-- writing a book). And so this 9th edition goal and aim is to go back and fix the picture of atoms, their geometry, and incorporate that discovery, mostly by fixing the picture of what atoms exterior and interior geometry is, in light of the fact that there is the Faraday Law going on inside of atoms.
>
> Length: 114 pages
> Word Wise: Enabled
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> Page Flip: Enabled
> Matchbook Price: $2.99 What's this?
>
>
> Product details
> File Size: 2354 KB
> Print Length: 115 pages
> Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
> Publication Date: June 10, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07SW87BF5
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> X-Ray: Not Enabled 
> Word Wise: Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported 
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #285,417 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #826 in Astronomy (Books)
> #166 in Astronomy (Kindle Store)
> #671 in Physics (Kindle Store)
>
>
>
>
> Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> Archimedes Plutonium
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages