Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.

Dismiss

525 views

Skip to first unread message

Mar 8, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/8/99

to

Joseph Michael Bay (jm...@leland.Stanford.EDU) wrote:

>

> James "Kibo" Parry (ki...@world.std.com) writes:

> >

> > Is it my imagination, or are Archimedes Plutonium's imaginary "movies"

> > starting to look good?

>

> _PIE_, the story of a brilliant scientist's descent into madness, brought

> on by an uncontrollable obsessive craving for pie filling.

>

> James "Kibo" Parry (ki...@world.std.com) writes:

> >

> > Is it my imagination, or are Archimedes Plutonium's imaginary "movies"

> > starting to look good?

>

> _PIE_, the story of a brilliant scientist's descent into madness, brought

> on by an uncontrollable obsessive craving for pie filling.

You see, Archie is smarter than we've realized -- all along he's just been

looking for the appropriate substance with which to fill the hole in his head.

> I think also the bit in _The Wall_ where Pink shaves his head after going

> starkers may have been inspired by Archie.

What I like is that his logic is that movie A is based on him because it

shows a young genius with a crew-cut, and that movie B is based on him

because it shows a bald insane guy, so any movie in which someone has

hair or has no hair, AND is either sane or not sane, is based on him.

Therefore, Archie has just proven the following movies are based on him:

"I.Q."

"Star Trek 5"

"Star Trek 19"

"I.Q. 19"

"Tank Girl"

"Baby Geniuses"

Allen Parker's "Bugsy Malone" <-- WITH SCOTT BAIO!!!

Allen Parker's "The Road To Wellville"

Allen Funt's "What Do You Say To A Naked Lady?"

"Zardoz" <-- WITH SEAN CONNERY!!!

"The Terror Of Tiny Town"

"Baby Huey's Big Adventure"

"The Celestine Prophecy: The Motion Picture -- YOU'RE WATCHING CBS!"

"Sesame Street Presents: Follow That Bird!"

"Waterworld"

"Fat Guy Goes Nutzoid"

"The Postman" <-- WITH TOM PETTY AS HIMSELF!!!

Roger Corman's "The Fantastic Four"

"Manos: The Hands Of Fate"

"Sybil Danning's Adventure Theater: Space 1999: Journey Through The Black Sun"

and

"Hitler" <-- WITH RICHARD BASEHART!!!

-- K.

By the time the German people found

out that Hitler was REALLY Richard

Basehart, it was too late!

Mar 9, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/9/99

to

ki...@world.std.com (James "Kibo" Parry)

> Allen Parker's "Bugsy Malone" <-- WITH SCOTT BAIO!!!

> "Zardoz" <-- WITH SEAN CONNERY!!!

> "The Postman" <-- WITH TOM PETTY AS HIMSELF!!!

> "Hitler" <-- WITH RICHARD BASEHART!!!

Ok, a lot of actors which will die soond

And he forgot to quote Bob Hope!!!!!!!!!!!

Teo Mora

Hey, Theo, you spelled your name wrong. (Kibo)

I HEREBY DUB THEE The Patron Saint of ^H^H^H (Pope Emperor proud)

"THEO MORA" or should I say, "MORE COMMUNISTS!"!!1! (beable)

-----------------------------------

Never travel West in the evening, nor East in the morning

Mar 9, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/9/99

to

James "Kibo" Parry <ki...@world.std.com> wrote:

-Therefore, Archie has just proven the following movies are based on him:

-Therefore, Archie has just proven the following movies are based on him:

Cool. We're now supposed to fill in the "penis"es, I take it?

-"I.Q."

-"Star Trek 5"

-"Star Trek 19"

-"I.Q. 19"

-"Tank Girl"

-"Baby Geniuses"

-Allen Parker's "Bugsy Malone" <-- WITH SCOTT BAIO!!!

-Allen Parker's "The Road To Wellville"

-Allen Funt's "What Do You Say To A Naked Lady?"

-"Zardoz" <-- WITH SEAN CONNERY!!!

-"The Terror Of Tiny Town"

-"Baby Huey's Big Adventure"

-"The Celestine Prophecy: The Motion Picture -- YOU'RE WATCHING CBS!"

-"Sesame Street Presents: Follow That Bird!"

-"Waterworld"

-"Fat Guy Goes Nutzoid"

-"The Postman" <-- WITH TOM PETTY AS HIMSELF!!!

-Roger Corman's "The Fantastic Four"

-"Manos: The Hands Of Fate"

-"Sybil Danning's Adventure Theater: Space 1999: Journey Through The Black Sun"

-and

-"Hitler" <-- WITH RICHARD BASEHART!!!

Dave "the exercise is left to the reader" DeLaney

--

\/David DeLaney d...@panacea.phys.utk.edu "It's not the pot that grows the flower

It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see

Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeable<BLINK>

http://panacea.phys.utk.edu/~dbd/ - net.legends FAQ/ I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.

Mar 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/10/99

to

In article <kibo-08039...@kibo.std.com>,

ki...@world.std.com (James "Kibo" Parry) wrote:

>

>

> Therefore, Archie has just proven the following movies are based on him:

>

<snipped list of movies>

ki...@world.std.com (James "Kibo" Parry) wrote:

>

>

> Therefore, Archie has just proven the following movies are based on him:

>

> "Manos: The Hands Of Fate"

You know, it suddenly all makes sense.

The endless driving and driving and driving is symbolic of Archie's

bike ride across the country to Hanover.

The Master is, of course, Archie - the King of Science and Logic.

And his cultists are all of his loyal (insane) subjects. The

family on vacation are symbolic of ordinary people who can't understand

his math/science.

And Torgo obviously is meant to be Kibo. But why does Kibo have

such big knees?

-Jeff

----

Who still thinks we should introduce Archimedes Plutonium to

Scientology, and watch as the universe collapses due to too much

silliness in one place at one time.

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------

http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

Dec 24, 2021, 2:49:55 AM12/24/21

to

Boycott Samsung & Hyundai until they free their moon bears

Kibo Parry's oil masterpiece painting of freeing Moon Bears.

\\ ("`****/").

\\ `0_ 0 ) `-.

\\ (_&_.)' ._ )

\\ `--' / /

\\ ==1(li)===========

\\

\\

two caged Moon Bears caged all their life and bile extracted

\\ ("`****//'").

\\ `0_ 0 ) `-.

\\ (_&_.)' ._ )

\\ `--' / /

\\ ==1(li)===========

\\

\\

Kibo Parry's oil masterpiece painting of freeing Moon Bears.

\\ ("`****/").

\\ `0_ 0 ) `-.

\\ (_&_.)' ._ )

\\ `--' / /

\\ ==1(li)===========

\\

\\

two caged Moon Bears caged all their life and bile extracted

\\ ("`****//'").

\\ `0_ 0 ) `-.

\\ (_&_.)' ._ )

\\ `--' / /

\\ ==1(li)===========

\\

\\

Message has been deleted

Dec 25, 2021, 2:00:36 AM12/25/21

to

🐁 of Math and 🐀 of Physics Archimedes "failure" Plutonium

<plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

> MATHOPEDIA-- List of 76 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// Student

teaches professor

And ArchiePoo's back, after (much) less than 24 hours!

Of course he never left, he was too busy spamming that he's leaving...

ArchiePoo has enough time to spam that falsehood of leaving, but dealing

with the nonexistent CIA spam takes "Too much time"...

>

> MATHOPEDIA-- List of 76 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// Student

teaches professor

1) Ludwig Poehlmann

2) Ludwig Hansen

3) Ludwig van Ludvig

4) Ludwig Plutonium

5) Archimedes Plutonium

6) Archimedes Plutonium

...

76) Archimedes Plutonium

<plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

> MATHOPEDIA-- List of 76 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// Student

teaches professor

And ArchiePoo's back, after (much) less than 24 hours!

Of course he never left, he was too busy spamming that he's leaving...

ArchiePoo has enough time to spam that falsehood of leaving, but dealing

with the nonexistent CIA spam takes "Too much time"...

>

> MATHOPEDIA-- List of 76 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// Student

teaches professor

1) Ludwig Poehlmann

2) Ludwig Hansen

3) Ludwig van Ludvig

4) Ludwig Plutonium

5) Archimedes Plutonium

6) Archimedes Plutonium

...

76) Archimedes Plutonium

Dec 25, 2021, 7:43:23 AM12/25/21

to

Michael Moroney wrote:

> 🐁 of Math and 🐀 of Physics Archimedes "failure" Plutonium

> <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

>

> > MATHOPEDIA-- List of 76 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// Student

> teaches professor

>

> And ArchiePoo's back, after (much) less than 24 hours!

this is nothing. This gorby destroyed the countries around him, much
> 🐁 of Math and 🐀 of Physics Archimedes "failure" Plutonium

> <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

>

> > MATHOPEDIA-- List of 76 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// Student

> teaches professor

>

> And ArchiePoo's back, after (much) less than 24 hours!

worse than Russia. Now in poverty and shame in the "west". The wannabe

capitalists dirt bags sold and destroyed everything, including vanishing

the gold of the state, "keeping it 'safe' from Russia". No industry, no

economy, no infrastructure, and all the former qualified personnel now

slaves in the "west". This includes Ukraine etc. These ukrainians are so

stupid.

Dec 25, 2021, 3:55:54 PM12/25/21

to

cherished MATHOPEDIA-- List of 76 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// Student teaches professor

>

> by Archimedes Plutonium

>

> Preface:

> A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.

>

> The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.

>

> The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.

>

> Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.

>

> I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).

>

> ----------------------------

> Table of Contents

> ----------------------------

>

> 1) Introduction

>

> 2) List of 76 errors, mistakes and fakes of Old Math.

>

> 3) Appendix

>

> ---------

> Text

> ---------

>

> 1) Introduction

>

>

> Alright, well, mathematics is a closed subject. What I mean by that is due to the textbook series of Archimedes Plutonium TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, that once you learn the polynomial transform and learn the two Power Rules of Calculus, you reached the peak, the pinnacle of all of mathematics, and anything further in math is just details of what you learn in that textbook series. Math is a completed science because it has this "peak of calculus", unlike the other 5 hard sciences of physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy. Those other five will continue to find new ideas, new things, while math remains static and complete to its peak of calculus understanding. Mathematics is finished complete as far as a science goes because the peak of math is going nowhere. And even though Physics will find new science such as how the proton toruses inside of atoms are configured in geometry, the geometry and calculus used in that configuration, that new science does not change nor does it create or require a new math peak/summit to handle the new physics.

>

> by Archimedes Plutonium

>

> Preface:

> A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.

>

> The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.

>

> The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.

>

> Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.

>

> I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).

>

> ----------------------------

> Table of Contents

> ----------------------------

>

> 1) Introduction

>

> 2) List of 76 errors, mistakes and fakes of Old Math.

>

> 3) Appendix

>

> ---------

> Text

> ---------

>

> 1) Introduction

>

>

> Alright, well, mathematics is a closed subject. What I mean by that is due to the textbook series of Archimedes Plutonium TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, that once you learn the polynomial transform and learn the two Power Rules of Calculus, you reached the peak, the pinnacle of all of mathematics, and anything further in math is just details of what you learn in that textbook series. Math is a completed science because it has this "peak of calculus", unlike the other 5 hard sciences of physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy. Those other five will continue to find new ideas, new things, while math remains static and complete to its peak of calculus understanding. Mathematics is finished complete as far as a science goes because the peak of math is going nowhere. And even though Physics will find new science such as how the proton toruses inside of atoms are configured in geometry, the geometry and calculus used in that configuration, that new science does not change nor does it create or require a new math peak/summit to handle the new physics.

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Aug 12, 2022, 8:12:20 AM8/12/22

to

STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science

On Thursday, August 11, 2022 at 1:21:09 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

> Sergi o says AMS Ruth Charney...

[snip]

When will you learn, Archie Poo???

AP is a malicious internet troll who wants only to mislead and confuse you. He may not be all there, but his fake math and science can only be meant to promote failure in schools. One can only guess at his motives.

In AP's OWN WORDS here:

“Primes do not exist, because the set they were borne from has no division.”

--June 29, 2020

“The last and largest finite number is 10^604.”

--June 3, 2015

“0 appears to be the last and largest finite number”

--June 9, 2015

“0/0 must be equal to 1.”

-- June 9, 2015

“0 is an infinite irrational number.”

--June 28, 2015

“No negative numbers exist.”

--December 22, 2018

“Rationals are not numbers.”

--May 18, 2019

According to AP's “chess board math,” an equilateral triangle is a right-triangle.

--December 11, 2019

Which could explain...

“The value of sin(45 degrees) = 1.”

--May 31, 2019

AP deliberately and repeatedly presented the truth table for OR as the truth table for AND:

“New Logic

AND

T & T = T

T & F = T

F & T = T

F & F = F”

--November 9, 2019

AP seeks aid of Russian agents to promote failure in schools:

"Please--Asking for help from Russia-- russian robots-- to create a new, true mathematics [sic]. What I like for the robots to do, is list every day, about 4 Colleges ( of the West) math dept, and ask why that math department is teaching false and fake math, and if unable to change to the correct true math, well, simply fire that math department until they can find professors who recognize truth in math from fakery...."

--November 9, 2017

And if that wasn't weird enough...

“The totality, everything that there is [the universe], is only 1 atom of plutonium [Pu]. There is nothing outside or beyond this one atom of plutonium.”

--April 4, 1994

“The Universe itself is one gigantic big atom.”

--November 14, 2019

AP's sinister Atom God Cult of Failure???

“Since God-Pu is marching on.

Glory! Glory! Atom Plutonium!

Its truth is marching on.

It has sounded forth the trumpet that shall never call retreat;

It is sifting out the hearts of people before its judgment seat;

Oh, be swift, my soul, to answer it; be jubilant, my feet!

Our God-Pu is marching on.”

--December 15, 2018 (Note: Pu is the atomic symbol for plutonium)

Dan

Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com

Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com

On Thursday, August 11, 2022 at 1:21:09 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

> Sergi o says AMS Ruth Charney...

[snip]

When will you learn, Archie Poo???

AP is a malicious internet troll who wants only to mislead and confuse you. He may not be all there, but his fake math and science can only be meant to promote failure in schools. One can only guess at his motives.

In AP's OWN WORDS here:

“Primes do not exist, because the set they were borne from has no division.”

--June 29, 2020

“The last and largest finite number is 10^604.”

--June 3, 2015

“0 appears to be the last and largest finite number”

--June 9, 2015

“0/0 must be equal to 1.”

-- June 9, 2015

“0 is an infinite irrational number.”

--June 28, 2015

“No negative numbers exist.”

--December 22, 2018

“Rationals are not numbers.”

--May 18, 2019

According to AP's “chess board math,” an equilateral triangle is a right-triangle.

--December 11, 2019

Which could explain...

“The value of sin(45 degrees) = 1.”

--May 31, 2019

AP deliberately and repeatedly presented the truth table for OR as the truth table for AND:

“New Logic

AND

T & T = T

T & F = T

F & T = T

F & F = F”

--November 9, 2019

AP seeks aid of Russian agents to promote failure in schools:

"Please--Asking for help from Russia-- russian robots-- to create a new, true mathematics [sic]. What I like for the robots to do, is list every day, about 4 Colleges ( of the West) math dept, and ask why that math department is teaching false and fake math, and if unable to change to the correct true math, well, simply fire that math department until they can find professors who recognize truth in math from fakery...."

--November 9, 2017

And if that wasn't weird enough...

“The totality, everything that there is [the universe], is only 1 atom of plutonium [Pu]. There is nothing outside or beyond this one atom of plutonium.”

--April 4, 1994

“The Universe itself is one gigantic big atom.”

--November 14, 2019

AP's sinister Atom God Cult of Failure???

“Since God-Pu is marching on.

Glory! Glory! Atom Plutonium!

Its truth is marching on.

It has sounded forth the trumpet that shall never call retreat;

It is sifting out the hearts of people before its judgment seat;

Oh, be swift, my soul, to answer it; be jubilant, my feet!

Our God-Pu is marching on.”

--December 15, 2018 (Note: Pu is the atomic symbol for plutonium)

Dan

Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com

Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com

Aug 12, 2022, 10:42:33 AM8/12/22

to

Dan Christensen wrote:

> On Thursday, August 11, 2022 at 1:21:09 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium

> wrote:

>> Sergi o says AMS Ruth Charney... [snip]

>

> When will you learn, Archie Poo???

you nazis know no mathematics and anything. At least Archie is not a nazi.
> On Thursday, August 11, 2022 at 1:21:09 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium

> wrote:

>> Sergi o says AMS Ruth Charney... [snip]

>

> When will you learn, Archie Poo???

He is a humanist. Still capitalist, but a humanist capitalist.

Aug 12, 2022, 2:55:56 PM8/12/22

to

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Dec 23, 2022, 2:32:43 AM12/23/22

to

Autistic Archimedes Plutonium spammed:

> Moscow electric blackouts██۞██

> Kibo Parry M. is he using bola or javelin short circuit weapons???

>

> Kibo Parry CIA undercover

> On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 10:26:03 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:

>

> Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---

> Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster

[snip rest of blithering]

Pluto, are you having yet another autism meltdown? You are spamming this

over and over and over again.

Get well soon!

> Moscow electric blackouts██۞██

> Kibo Parry M. is he using bola or javelin short circuit weapons???

>

> Kibo Parry CIA undercover

> On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 10:26:03 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:

>

> Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---

> Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster

[snip rest of blithering]

Pluto, are you having yet another autism meltdown? You are spamming this

over and over and over again.

Get well soon!

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Jan 1, 2023, 2:28:14 PM1/1/23

to

Wow....Archimedes, You are so god damn intelligent. Makes me jealous.

On Friday, December 24, 2021 at 9:49:55 AM UTC+2, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

> Boycott Samsung & Hyundai until they free their moon bears

>

> Kibo Parry's oil masterpiece painting of freeing Moon Bears.

>

> \\ ("`****/").

> \\ `0_ 0 ) `-.

> \\ (_&_.)' ._ )

> \\ `--' / /

> \\ ==1(li)===========

> \\

> \\

> two caged Moon Bears caged all their life and bile extracted

>

> \\ ("`****//'").

> \\ `0_ 0 ) `-.

> \\ (_&_.)' ._ )

> \\ `--' / /

> \\ ==1(li)===========

> \\

> \\

>

On Friday, December 24, 2021 at 9:49:55 AM UTC+2, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

> Boycott Samsung & Hyundai until they free their moon bears

>

> Kibo Parry's oil masterpiece painting of freeing Moon Bears.

>

> \\ ("`****/").

> \\ `0_ 0 ) `-.

> \\ (_&_.)' ._ )

> \\ `--' / /

> \\ ==1(li)===========

> \\

> \\

> two caged Moon Bears caged all their life and bile extracted

>

> \\ ("`****//'").

> \\ `0_ 0 ) `-.

> \\ (_&_.)' ._ )

> \\ `--' / /

> \\ ==1(li)===========

> \\

> \\

>

Message has been deleted

Jan 1, 2023, 7:13:18 PM1/1/23

to

jspe...@my-dejanews.com kirjutas Kolmapäev, 10. märts 1999 kl 10:00:00 UTC+2:

> In article <kibo-08039...@kibo.std.com>,

> ki...@world.std.com (James "Kibo" Parry) wrote:

> >

> >

> > Therefore, Archie has just proven the following movies are based on him:

> >

> <snipped list of movies>

> > "Manos: The Hands Of Fate"

> You know, it suddenly all makes sense.

> The endless driving and driving and driving is symbolic of Archie's

> bike ride across the country to Hanover.

> The Master is, of course, Archie - the King of Science and Logic.

> And his cultists are all of his loyal (insane) subjects. The

> family on vacation are symbolic of ordinary people who can't understand

> his math/science.

> And Torgo obviously is meant to be Kibo. But why does Kibo have

> such big knees?

> -Jeff

> ----

> Who still thinks we should introduce Archimedes Plutonium to

> Scientology, and watch as the universe collapses due to too much

> silliness in one place at one time.

> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------

> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

Who was Your english teacher ? You surely know, how to write.

> In article <kibo-08039...@kibo.std.com>,

> ki...@world.std.com (James "Kibo" Parry) wrote:

> >

> >

> > Therefore, Archie has just proven the following movies are based on him:

> >

> <snipped list of movies>

> > "Manos: The Hands Of Fate"

> You know, it suddenly all makes sense.

> The endless driving and driving and driving is symbolic of Archie's

> bike ride across the country to Hanover.

> The Master is, of course, Archie - the King of Science and Logic.

> And his cultists are all of his loyal (insane) subjects. The

> family on vacation are symbolic of ordinary people who can't understand

> his math/science.

> And Torgo obviously is meant to be Kibo. But why does Kibo have

> such big knees?

> -Jeff

> ----

> Who still thinks we should introduce Archimedes Plutonium to

> Scientology, and watch as the universe collapses due to too much

> silliness in one place at one time.

> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------

> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

Who was Your english teacher ? You surely know, how to write.

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Feb 15, 2023, 9:27:22 AM2/15/23

to

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Feb 28, 2023, 5:32:54 PM2/28/23

to

🐜 of Math and 🐛 of Physics Archimedes "Imp of Math" Plutonium

<plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

> Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█

> _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity

>

You did correctly diagnose yourself as insane! You said that

"doing the same foolish thing over and over again" is insanity and once

again, you did the same foolish thing over and over again anyway! We

heard you the first time!

<plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

> Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█

> _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity

>

You did correctly diagnose yourself as insane! You said that

"doing the same foolish thing over and over again" is insanity and once

again, you did the same foolish thing over and over again anyway! We

heard you the first time!

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

May 6, 2023, 2:32:51 AM5/6/23

to

Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Ingrid Wilke,Heidi Jo Newberg,Elizabeth Kam,Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett

> On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:09:52 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

> > I want to fuck her corpse

Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart

by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

Kibo Parry aka Moroney-Volney

On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 9:42:50 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 9:43:45 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart

by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

Why on Earth does Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney hate the Pope?? Was it because Kibo failed science and he blames the Pope for his failure???

On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 9:43:31 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

Kibo's hatred of the Pope, for Kibo is a insane stalker....

Re: Archimedes "Pope Arky the Last" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

Pluto, it's time for your punishment again, already? of Math and of Physics Archimedes "

by Volney May 2, 2023, 6:15:57 PM

Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart

by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 12:17:11 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

>it's time for your punishment again, already?

Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart

by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 12:17:14 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

>"certifiably insane"

Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Ingrid Wilke,Heidi Jo Newberg,Elizabeth Kam,Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett

> On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:09:52 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

> > I want to fuck her corpse

On Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 6:21:45 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

>you're telling me it's time for your punishment?

>

>"Putin's lackey"

Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart

by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

>

> > > > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition

> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory

> > > > >

> > > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.

> > > > >

> > > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.

> > > > >

> > > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.

> > > > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.

> > > > > Length: 64 pages

> > > > >

> > > > > Product details

> > > > > • File Size : 790 KB

> > > > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020

> > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled

> > > > > • Print Length : 64 pages

> > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled

> > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported

> > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled

> > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > > > • Language: : English

> > > > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY

> > > > > • Lending : Enabled

> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

> > > > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory

> > > > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)

> > > > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

> > > > >

> > > > > #2-2, 145th published book

> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2

> > > > > Kindle Edition

> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > > > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.

> > > > >

> > > > > Product details

> > > > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB

> > > > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020

> > > > > • Language: : English

> > > > > • File size : 682 KB

> > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported

> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled

> > > > > • Print length : 78 pages

> > > > > • Lending : Enabled

> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

> > > > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads

> > > > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)

> > > > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)

> > > > >

> > > > > #2-3, 146th published book

> > > > >

> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3

> > > > > Kindle Edition

> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > > > >

> > > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.

> > > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.

> > > > >

> > > > > Product details

> > > > > • ASIN : B08RK33T8V

> > > > > • Publication date : December 28, 2020

> > > > > • Language : English

> > > > > • File size : 794 KB

> > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported

> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled

> > > > > • Print length : 123 pages

> > > > > • Lending : Enabled

> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

> > > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)

> > > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > #2-4, 151st published book

> > > > >

> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4

> > > > > Kindle Edition

> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > > > >

> > > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.

> > > > >

> > > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.

> > > > >

> > > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.

> > > > >

> > > > > Product details

> > > > > • ASIN : B09JW5DVYM

> > > > > • Publication date : October 19, 2021

> > > > > • Language : English

> > > > > • File size : 1035 KB

> > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported

> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled

> > > > > • Print length : 386 pages

> > > > > • Lending : Enabled

> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

> > > > > ◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory

> > > > > ◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)

> > > > > ◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > #2-5, 174th published book

> > > > >

> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College

> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition

> > > > >

> > > > > Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).

> > > > > Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.

> > > > >

> > > > > Product details

> > > > > • ASIN : B09TKL4HMC

> > > > > • Publication date : February 27, 2022

> > > > > • Language : English

> > > > > • File size : 675 KB

> > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported

> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled

> > > > > • Print length : 41 pages

> > > > > • Lending : Enabled

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > #2-6, 177th published book

> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College

> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition

> > > > >

> > > > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.

> > > > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.

> > > > >

> > > > > Product details

> > > > > • ASIN : B09VFH9QST

> > > > > • Publication date : March 12, 2022

> > > > > • Language : English

> > > > > • File size : 823 KB

> > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported

> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled

> > > > > • Print length : 74 pages

> > > > > • Lending : Enabled

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > #2-7, 178th published book

> > > > >

> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College

> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.

> > > > >

> > > > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.

> > > > >

> > > > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.

> > > > >

> > > > > Product details

> > > > > • ASIN : B09W58XGDW

> > > > > • Publication date : March 21, 2022

> > > > > • Language : English

> > > > > • File size : 824 KB

> > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled

> > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported

> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

> > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled

> > > > > • Print length : 66 pages

> > > > > • Lending : Enabled

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept

> > > Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang

> > >

> > > Rensselaer math department

> > > Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann

> > > On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 12:36:39 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

> > > > Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics

> > > > On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 10:55:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:

> > > > >"certifiably insane"

> > > > > fails at math and science:

> > > > > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > > > "I want to fuck her corpse"

> > > > > Not again!

> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > >

> > > > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?

> > > > >

> > > > > wanting to fuck her corpse

> > > > >

> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > >

> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > >

> > > > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 2:26:54 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

> > > > > Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics

> > > > > tarded:

> > > >

> > > > NSF Dr.Panchanathan, Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.

> > > >

> > > > 1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.

> > > > 2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.

> > > > 3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity.

> > > > 4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.

> > > >

> > > > 5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.

> > > > 6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction

> > > > 7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"

> > > > 8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.

148th published book

Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 30Nov2021. And this is AP's 148th published science book.

Preface:

Physics book that explains what the universe is, and how it works. This is a continuation of the Atomic Theory by Democritus in Ancient Greek times. It adds one more fact to the Atomic Theory picture. That the Universe itself is one gigantic big atom. The picture is that of the Universe, in total, is one big atom that contains more atoms, inside itself. It completes the logic of science that Dr. Feynman wrote-- all things are made up of atoms -- and so, to complete that idea -- all things and the universe itself is an atom.

In this edition of year 2021, AP actually proves the Atom Totality theory, and therefore, a simultaneously _disproof_ of the Big Bang theory. The proof is simple, in that the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but rather, instead, shine from the Faraday law going on inside each and every proton in the Sun or star, or, in the Universe. The muon is the true electron of atoms and is the bar magnet in Faraday's law while the proton is a 840MeV particle in the geometry shape of 8 ring coil torus that is the closed loop coil in Faraday's Law. NASA scientists have discovered the Sun is a yearly increase in radiation of 0.005% yearly, and is why 25% of all insects have perished in the last decade 2010-2020. Stars and Sun shine from Faraday law, not from fusion and that is how the Universe itself grows. So, we cannot logically have two different mechanisms for the creation of the Universe. We cannot have electricity magnetism of Faraday law and then some silly "explosion of Big Bang" to create and grow the universe.

Also, in the course of providing supporting evidence of the Atom Totality theory, my research had to revise and correct the entire Maxwell Equations, and revise and correct the theory, the quantum electrodynamics theory.

Cover Picture: Again I used 8 rings from plumbing hardware to represent the 8 rings of a proton torus, and visualize each ring as a dot cloud pattern instead of a continuous ring, and the holes in some of those rings helps facilitate that image. Notice the muon ring is inside the proton torus rings, and perpendicular, and situated at the equator, going around and around the proton torus at nearly the speed of light in the Faraday law; producing electricity. Atoms are designed to produce maximum electricity, given their masses.

Product details

• ASIN : B08T82M2LP

• Publication date : January 16, 2021

• Language : English

• File size : 872 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Print length : 329 pages

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #203,710 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #289 in Physics (Kindle Store)

◦ #1,716 in Physics (Books)

#1-2, 48th published book

Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, Atom Totality Series, book 2 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

--------------------------

Table of Contents

--------------------------

1) A visual image of a Atom Totality

2) Simply multiply 9 times 105MeV and there you get the rest mass of proton and neutron.

3) The tau-electron 1777MeV is merely 105MeV multiply by 17 is 1785 with Sigma Error of 0.4%.

4) Particle in the 840MeV range so that we can say we discovered the proton particle isolated of its internal muon.

5) Found a 840MeV particle in experimental physics, but, is it the proton torus without its interior occupied by a muon?

6) The theory of 9s, as help in physics.

7) How we picture the interior of Atoms, and the Atom Totality.

8) The Principle of Scooting-Over, applied.

9) An ongoing commentary of the geometry of atoms, both interior and exterior.

10) Galaxies form Rings in Faraday Coil, and Faraday bar-magnet // Cosmic Proton, Cosmic Muon.

11) Is there a Cosmic Faraday Law going on?

Product details

File Size: 2370 KB

Print Length: 148 pages

Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited

Publication Date: June 10, 2019

Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC

Language: English

ASIN: B07SW87BF5

Text-to-Speech: Enabled

X-Ray: Not Enabled

Word Wise: Enabled

Lending: Enabled

Screen Reader: Supported

Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #285,417 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)

#826 in Astronomy (Books)

#166 in Astronomy (Kindle Store)

#671 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#1-3, 74th published book

HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.

Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.

Product details

• Publication Date : December 18, 2019

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Print Length : 17 pages

• File Size : 698 KB

• ASIN : B082WYGVNG

• Language: : English

• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled

• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Lending : Enabled

#1-4, 105th published book

Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.

Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.

Product details

• Publication Date : March 24, 2020

• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• ASIN : B086BGSNXN

• Print Length : 39 pages

• File Size : 935 KB

• Language: : English

• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled

• Lending : Enabled

Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)

#6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)

#315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads

#4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#1-5, 112th published book

New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5

Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.

Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.

Product details

• ASIN : B0875SVDC7

• Publication date : April 15, 2020

• Language: : English

• File size : 1134 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Print length : 20 pages

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference

◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#1-6, 135th published book

QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.

Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.

Product details

• ASIN : B08K47K5BB

• Publication date : September 25, 2020

• Language : English

• File size : 587 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Print length : 25 pages

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #240,837 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #8 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

◦ #35 in General Chemistry & Reference

◦ #264 in General Chemistry

#1-7, 138th published book

The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.

Product details

• Publication Date : October 9, 2020

• File Size : 828 KB

• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Print Length : 41 pages

• ASIN : B08KZT5TCD

• Language: : English

• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled

• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Lending : Enabled

#1-8, 1st published book

Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.

Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.

Foreward:

I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.

Length: 632 pages

Product details

File Size: 1132 KB

Print Length: 632 pages

Publication Date: March 11, 2019

Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC

Language: English

ASIN: B07PLP9NDR

Text-to-Speech: Enabled

X-Ray: Not Enabled

Word Wise: Enabled

Lending: Enabled

Screen Reader: Supported

Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)

#1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#8526 in Physics (Books)

#18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)

#1-9, 163rd published book

Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition

Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate.

Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa.

Product details

• ASIN : B09NQ65H9F

• Publication date : December 15, 2021

• Language : English

• File size : 999 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Print length : 60 pages

• Lending : Enabled

#1-10, 161st published book

PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.

Preface:

A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.

It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.

Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.

Product details

• ASIN : B09N18QPP1

• Publication date : December 3, 2021

• Language : English

• File size : 1139 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Print length : 82 pages

• Lending : Enabled

> > > > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 3:21:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

> > > > > fails at math and science:

> > > > Kibo Parry M the 30 year stalker joined by his friends Chris Thomasson and Dan Christensen
> > > > > fails at math and science:

> > > > Why Kibo, because Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher, Harvard's Dr.Hau cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???

> > > >

> > >

> > > >

> > > > Kibo Parry M on CIA Kate Heinzelman,Harvard's Dr. Hau.

> > > > Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > Why Kibo??? Because she refuses to finish her experiment and see all the light vanishes simultaneously, or is it because she can not admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???

> > > >

> > > > On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 12:21:30 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

> > > > >"Imp of Math"

> > > > On Monday, January 18, 2021 at 2:06:24 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:

> > > > > fails at math and science:

> > > > Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
> > > > > fails at math and science:

> > > > By Michael Moroney 1/23/18, 44 posts 461 views

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Kibo on Kate Heinzelman

> > > > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---

> > > > Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster

> > > > >> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 9:13:14 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

> > > > >"Court Jester of Math"

> > > >

> > > > Kibo,is Ruth Charney of AMS the model in your book, for she cannot admit the slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse as proven by AP in 2016? I know it falls on deaf ears of Kibo with his 938 is 12% short of 945. And Ruth, would the AMS publish Kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945, because the AMS certainly will not publish AP's conic proof? Maybe that is all the AMS publishes-- fake math.

> > > >

> > > > Kibo on wanting to fuck her corpse/Kate Heinzelman, question, do you not think CIA is going overboard on stalking-- I mean 30 years for the insane Kibo Parry M??

> > > >

> > > > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 3:21:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

> > > > > fails at math and science:

> > > > Kibo's "I want to fuck her corpse" rubbing off on Canada's Dan Christensen with his 20 year stalking of Univ Toronto's Rose M. Patten, Univ Western Ontario's Linda Hasenfratz, when Dan is a failure of math and logic with his 2 OR 1=3, and his ellipse
> > > > > fails at math and science:

> > > >

> > > > Kibo Parry M the 30 year stalker joined by his friends Chris Thomasson and Dan Christensen

> > > > Why Kibo, because Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher, Harvard's Dr.Hau cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???

> > > >

> > > > On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 10:55:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:

> > > > >"certifiably insane"

> > > > > fails at math and science:

> > > > > > "I want to fuck her corpse"

> > > > > "I want to fuck her corpse"

> > > > > Not again!

> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > >

> > > > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?

> > > > >

> > > > > wanting to fuck her corpse

> > > > >

> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > >

> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > >

Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart

by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

May 10, 2023, 12:17:09 AM5/10/23

to

Kibo hates the Pope but why???

Kibo has thousands of post headers declaring Kibo hates the Pope-- is is just sheer insanity of Kibo??

Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney-- 30 year hate spew stalker

Volney's profile photo

Volney

10:57 PM (14 minutes ago) 9 May, 2023

Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure"

to

Kibo's corpse fucking=AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett,Heidi Jo Newberg,Elizabeth Kam

On Tuesday, May 9, 2023 at 2:25:42 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

> Woodlouse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics

Why Kibo? Because they cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse, or because they fail at doing a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?

Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett,Heidi Jo Newberg,Elizabeth Kam

Kibo geometry failure:

On Monday, June 15, 2020 at 1:13:27 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

> Here you are!

> Below you will find a simple *proof* that shows that certain conic

> sections are ellipses.

>

> Some preliminaries:

>

> Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used

> in the proof:

>

> ^ x

> |

> -+- < xh

> .' | `.

> . | .

> | | |

> ' | '

> `. | .'

> y <----------+ < x0

> Cone (side view):

> .

> /|\

> / | \

> /b | \

> /---+---' < x h

> / |' \

> / ' | \

> / ' | \

> x 0 > '-------+-------\

> / a | \

>

> Proof:

>

> r(x) a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence

>

> y(x)^2 r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.

>

> Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 1 ...equation of an ellipse

>

> qed

Kibo arithmetic failure:

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:

> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.

> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.

Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:

> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass

> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---

Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster

>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:

> >

The never ending stalker and character defiler, paid to stalk Kibo Parry aka Moroney-Volney.

Why Kibo, because no-one at Rensselaer can admit slant cut of cone is Oval not ellipse. Or because no-one at Rensselaer can ask the question, which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle??

It is for sure that no-one at Rensselaer Polytech can do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- all they can do is the phony limit-analysis of 0 width rectangles, as if analyzing something constitutes a proof of math.

Re: Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse > AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart

by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

>

> Volney

>

> 7

>

> unread,

> > Rensselaer's Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt,Donald Schwendeman

> > Kibo on howling crazy fuckdogs

> > On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 6:07:13 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

> > >"antiscience"

> > >"howling crazy fuckdog"

> >

> > Kibo Parry aka Moroney aka Volney the paid for 30 year stalker.

> >

> > Why Kibo? Because they cannot ask the simple physics question???

> >

> > NSF Dr.Panchanathan, Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, Harry Cliff ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.

> > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish

> > > > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita

> > > > Arthur B. McDonald

> > > > Francois Englert

> > > > Saul Perlmutter

> > > > Brian P. Schmidt

> > > > Adam G. Riess

> > > > Makoto Kobayashi

> > > > Toshihide Maskawa_

> > > > Yoichiro Nambu_

> > > > John C. Mather

> > > > George F. Smoot

> > > > Roy J. Glauber_

> > > > David J. Gross

> > > > Hugh David Politzer

> > > > Frank Wilczek

> > > > Raymond Davis Jr. _

> > > > Masatoshi Koshiba_

> > > > Riccardo Giacconi_

> > > > Gerardus 't Hooft

> > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman_

> > > > Jerome I. Friedman

> > > > Henry W. Kendall_

> > > > Richard E. Taylor_

> > > > Carlo Rubbia

> > > > Simon van der Meer_

> > > > William Alfred Fowler_

> > > > Kenneth G. Wilson_

> > > > James Watson Cronin_

> > > > Val Logsdon Fitch_

> > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow

> > > > Steven Weinberg_

> > > > .

> > > > .

> > > > little fishes

> > > > .

> > > > .

> > > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV

> > > >

> > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass

> > > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu

> > > > more and more layers of error thinking physics

> > > > .

> > > > .

> > > > Edward Witten

> > > > John Baez

> > > > Brian Greene

> > > > Lisa Randall

> > > > Alan H. Guth

> > > > Michael E. Brown

> > > > Konstantin Batygin

> > > > Ben Bullock

> > > > Larry Harson

> > > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan

> > > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views

> > > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.

> > > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley

> > > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater

> > > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater

> > > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > #2-1, 137th published book

Kibo has thousands of post headers declaring Kibo hates the Pope-- is is just sheer insanity of Kibo??

Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney-- 30 year hate spew stalker

Volney's profile photo

Volney

10:57 PM (14 minutes ago) 9 May, 2023

Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure"

to

Kibo's corpse fucking=AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett,Heidi Jo Newberg,Elizabeth Kam

On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:09:52 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

> I want to fuck her corpse

Why Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney, why???
> I want to fuck her corpse

On Tuesday, May 9, 2023 at 2:25:42 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

> Woodlouse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics

Why Kibo? Because they cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse, or because they fail at doing a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?

Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett,Heidi Jo Newberg,Elizabeth Kam

On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:09:52 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

> I want to fuck her corpse

Why does the CIA, NSF pay Kibo to stalk every day of the year in sci.math and sci.physics when he knows no math or physics with his 938 is 12% short of 945.
> I want to fuck her corpse

Kibo geometry failure:

On Monday, June 15, 2020 at 1:13:27 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

> Here you are!

> Below you will find a simple *proof* that shows that certain conic

> sections are ellipses.

>

> Some preliminaries:

>

> Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used

> in the proof:

>

> ^ x

> |

> -+- < xh

> .' | `.

> . | .

> | | |

> ' | '

> `. | .'

> y <----------+ < x0

> Cone (side view):

> .

> /|\

> / | \

> /b | \

> /---+---' < x h

> / |' \

> / ' | \

> / ' | \

> x 0 > '-------+-------\

> / a | \

>

> Proof:

>

> r(x) a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence

>

> y(x)^2 r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.

>

> Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 1 ...equation of an ellipse

>

> qed

Kibo arithmetic failure:

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:

> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.

> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.

Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:

> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass

> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---

Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster

>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:

> >

Why Kibo, because no-one at Rensselaer can admit slant cut of cone is Oval not ellipse. Or because no-one at Rensselaer can ask the question, which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle??

It is for sure that no-one at Rensselaer Polytech can do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- all they can do is the phony limit-analysis of 0 width rectangles, as if analyzing something constitutes a proof of math.

Re: Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse > AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart

by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

>

>

> 7

>

> unread,

> > Rensselaer's Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt,Donald Schwendeman

> > Kibo on howling crazy fuckdogs

> > On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 6:07:13 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

> > >"antiscience"

> > >"howling crazy fuckdog"

> >

> > Kibo Parry aka Moroney aka Volney the paid for 30 year stalker.

> >

> > Why Kibo? Because they cannot ask the simple physics question???

> >

> > NSF Dr.Panchanathan, Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, Harry Cliff ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.

> >

> >

> > 1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.

> > 2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.

> > 3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity.

> > 4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.

> >

> > 5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.

> > 6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction

> > 7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"

> > 8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.

> >

> >

> >

> > > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> >

> > 1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.

> > 2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.

> > 3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity.

> > 4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.

> >

> > 5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.

> > 6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction

> > 7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"

> > 8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.

> >

> >

> >

> > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish

> > > > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita

> > > > Arthur B. McDonald

> > > > Francois Englert

> > > > Saul Perlmutter

> > > > Brian P. Schmidt

> > > > Adam G. Riess

> > > > Makoto Kobayashi

> > > > Toshihide Maskawa_

> > > > Yoichiro Nambu_

> > > > John C. Mather

> > > > George F. Smoot

> > > > Roy J. Glauber_

> > > > David J. Gross

> > > > Hugh David Politzer

> > > > Frank Wilczek

> > > > Raymond Davis Jr. _

> > > > Masatoshi Koshiba_

> > > > Riccardo Giacconi_

> > > > Gerardus 't Hooft

> > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman_

> > > > Jerome I. Friedman

> > > > Henry W. Kendall_

> > > > Richard E. Taylor_

> > > > Carlo Rubbia

> > > > Simon van der Meer_

> > > > William Alfred Fowler_

> > > > Kenneth G. Wilson_

> > > > James Watson Cronin_

> > > > Val Logsdon Fitch_

> > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow

> > > > Steven Weinberg_

> > > > .

> > > > .

> > > > little fishes

> > > > .

> > > > .

> > > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV

> > > >

> > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass

> > > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu

> > > > more and more layers of error thinking physics

> > > > .

> > > > .

> > > > Edward Witten

> > > > John Baez

> > > > Brian Greene

> > > > Lisa Randall

> > > > Alan H. Guth

> > > > Michael E. Brown

> > > > Konstantin Batygin

> > > > Ben Bullock

> > > > Larry Harson

> > > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan

> > > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views

> > > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.

> > > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley

> > > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater

> > > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater

> > > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > #2-1, 137th published book

May 10, 2023, 12:45:17 PM5/10/23

to

Message has been deleted

May 12, 2023, 12:51:51 AM5/12/23

to

Autistic Archimedes Plutonium tarded:

> Kibo on Archimedes Plutonium

> Kibo Parry (Moroney-Volney) on Archimedes Plutonium

> On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 11:27:58 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

>> Archimedes "mindless barking fuckdog" Plutonium

>> Archimedes "math hater" Plutonium

>> Archimedes Plutonium fails at math and science:

>> Why do you refuse to explain your illogical "syllogism"? Is it because

>> you have no evidence for it? Because you know it is false?

StupidPlutonium, why are you spamming this? Are you having another

autism meltdown? Or is it just time for your punishment again?

>> Oh you need to see the ellipse-is-a-conic-section proof again? Here you go!

>> / |' \

>> / ' | \

>> / ' | \

>> x = 0 => '-------+-------\

>> / a | \

>>

>> Proof:

>>

>> r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence

>>

>> y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.

>>

>> Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1 ...equation of an ellipse

>>

>> qed

>>

Amazing that you can quote this proof yet you simply cannot understand

it. Do you need help understanding it? Can you at least see that it has

two axes of symmetry? One around y=0 and the other around x=h/2?

> Kibo on Archimedes Plutonium

> Kibo Parry (Moroney-Volney) on Archimedes Plutonium

> On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 11:27:58 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

>> Archimedes "mindless barking fuckdog" Plutonium

>> Archimedes "math hater" Plutonium

>> Archimedes Plutonium fails at math and science:

>> Why do you refuse to explain your illogical "syllogism"? Is it because

>> you have no evidence for it? Because you know it is false?

StupidPlutonium, why are you spamming this? Are you having another

autism meltdown? Or is it just time for your punishment again?

>> Oh you need to see the ellipse-is-a-conic-section proof again? Here you go!

>>

>>

>> Some preliminaries:

>>

>> Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used

>> in the proof:

>>

>> ^ x

>> |

>> -+- <= x=h
>>

>> Some preliminaries:

>>

>> Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used

>> in the proof:

>>

>> ^ x

>> |

>> .' | `.

>> . | .

>> | | |

>> ' | '

>> `. | .'

>> y <----------+ <= x=0
>> . | .

>> | | |

>> ' | '

>> `. | .'

>>

>> Cone (side view):

>> .

>> /|\

>> / | \

>> /b | \

>> /---+---' <= x = h
>> Cone (side view):

>> .

>> /|\

>> / | \

>> /b | \

>> / |' \

>> / ' | \

>> / ' | \

>> x = 0 => '-------+-------\

>> / a | \

>>

>> Proof:

>>

>> r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence

>>

>> y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.

>>

>> Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1 ...equation of an ellipse

>>

>> qed

>>

Amazing that you can quote this proof yet you simply cannot understand

it. Do you need help understanding it? Can you at least see that it has

two axes of symmetry? One around y=0 and the other around x=h/2?

May 12, 2023, 1:36:35 AM5/12/23

to

Kibo on Dr. Terence Tao

Kibo Parry (Moroney-Volney) on Dr.Tao

> "math hater"

On Sunday, May 13, 2018 at 8:41:41 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

> Archimedes "failure" Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails:

>

> >So, Terence Tao, every day you are quiet and silent about Ellipse is a

> >Cylinder section, never a Conic section, is every day you are silent

> >means you agree that a Ellipse is a Conic,

>

> First of all, Terence Tao has almost never heard of, or cares about a

Kibo, you attacked and stalked AP for 30 years nonstop, are you going to attack and stalk anti-math Dr. Tao and anti-math Dr. Wiles for 30 years nonstop??

Kibo why do you hate the Pope with your constant reference to the Pope?? Is it your necrophilia, Kibo Parry, that you hate the Pope?? Or is it because the Catholic Church schools denied your entrance for the stalker-sinner you are and that is why you failed math and science?

Kibo blaming others> Why are you attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you

> hold an evil false god before God, but that's no reason to hate their

> pope. Is it because the pope (and past popes) said gay people like

> yourself will go to hell or something? Did he say something about your

> necrophilia? I am unaware of any papal statement about necrophilia, but

> certainly he'd disapprove of your necrophilia!

>

Kibo > You have been claiming this silliness, without proof, for some 30 years.

AP writes: Kibo I recommend you write a letter to the Pope asking for forgiveness of using his name in your daily "hate speech spew on Usenet". I am sure the Pope will forgive you of your sins.

Kibo, chill out, Archimedes Plutonium proved slant cut of cone was Oval, never ellipse and a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, neither of which Dr. Tao can admit the truth, he just runs and hides. Does UCLA have enough hiding spots for Dr. Tao????

My 134th published book

Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had already written the series of TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS in a 7 volume, 8 book set. This would be the first book in that 8 book set (one of the books is a companion book to 1st year college). But I suppose that I needed to write the full series before I could write the Introduction and know what I had to talk about and talk about in a logical progression order. Sounds paradoxical in a sense, that I needed to write the full series first and then go back and write the Introduction. But in another sense, hard to write an introduction on something you have not really fully done and completed. For example to know what is error filled Old Math and to list those errors in a logical order requires me to write the full 7 volumes in order to list in order the mistakes.

Cover Picture: Mathematics begins with counting, with numbers, with quantity. But counting numbers needs geometry for something to count in the first place. So here in this picture of the generalized Hydrogen atom of chemistry and physics is a torus geometry of 8 rings of a proton torus and one ring where my fingers are, is a equator ring that is the muon and thrusting through the proton torus at the equator of the torus. So we count 9 rings in all. So math is created by atoms and math numbers exist because atoms have many geometry figures to count. And geometry exists because atoms have shapes and different figures.

Product details

• ASIN : B08K2XQB4M

• Publication date : September 24, 2020

• Language : English

• File size : 576 KB

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #224,974 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #3 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

◦ #23 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

◦ #182 in Calculus (Books)

#5-2, 45th published

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon Kindle edition)

Last revision was 2NOV2020. And this is AP's 45th published book of science.

Preface: Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education.

This is a textbook series in several volumes that carries every person through all his/her math education starting age 5 up to age 26. Volume 2 is for age 5 year old to that of senior in High School, that is needed to do both science and math. Every other math book is incidental to this series of Teaching True Mathematics.

It is a journal-textbook because Amazon's Kindle offers me the ability to edit overnight, and to change the text, almost on a daily basis. A unique first in education textbooks-- almost a continual overnight editing. Adding new text, correcting text. Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education. Volume 3 carries the Freshperson in College for their math calculus education.

Cover Picture: The Numbers as Integers from 0 to 100, and 10 Grid when dividing by 10, and part of the 100 Grid when dividing by 100. Decimal Grid Numbers are the true numbers of mathematics. The Reals, the rationals & irrationals, the algebraic & transcendentals, the imaginary & Complex, and the negative-numbers are all fake numbers. For, to be a true number, you have to "be counted" by mathematical induction. The smallest Grid system is the Decimal 10 Grid.

Product details

ASIN : B07RG7BVZW

Publication date : May 2, 2019

Language : English

File size : 2024 KB

Lending : Enabled

Best Sellers Rank: #235,426 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

#15 in General Geometry

#223 in Geometry & Topology (Books)

#5-3, 55th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 25Jun2021. And this is AP's 55th published book of science.

Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019

Preface: This is volume 3, book 3 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Freshperson students, 1st year college students of age 18-19. It is the continuation of volume 2 for ages 5 through 18 years old.

The main major topic is the AP-EM equations of electricity and magnetism, the mathematics for the laws of electricity and magnetism; what used to be called the Maxwell Equations of Physics. The 1st Year College Math has to prepare all students with the math for all the sciences. So 1st year college Math is like a huge intersection station that has to prepare students with the math they need to do the hard sciences such as physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, geology, etc. What this means is, 1st year college is calculus that allows the student to work with electricity and magnetism. All the math that is needed to enable students to do electricity and magnetism. In Old Math before this textbook, those Old Math textbooks would end in 1/3 of the text about Arclength, vector space, div, curl, Line Integral, Green's, Stokes, Divergence theorem trying to reach and be able to teach Maxwell Equations. But sadly, barely any Old Math classroom reached that 1/3 ending of the textbook, and left all those college students without any math to tackle electricity and magnetism. And most of Old Math was just muddle headed wrong even if they covered the last 1/3 of the textbook. And that is totally unacceptable in science. This textbook fixes that huge hole and gap in Old Math education.

And there is no way around it, that a course in 1st year College Calculus is going to do a lot of hands on experiment with electricity and magnetism, and is required of the students to buy a list of physics apparatus-- multimeter, galvanometer, coil, bar magnet, alligator clip wires, electromagnet, iron filing case, and possibly even a 12 volt transformer, all shown in the cover picture. The beginning of this textbook and the middle section all leads into the ending of this textbook-- we learn the AP-EM Equations and how to use those equations. And there is no escaping the fact that it has to be hands on physics experiments in the classroom of mathematics.

But, do not be scared, for this is all easy easy easy. For if you passed and enjoyed Volume 2 TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, then I promise you, you will not be stressed with Volume 3, for I go out of my way to make it clear and understandable.

Warning: this is a Journal Textbook, meaning that I am constantly adding new material, constantly revising, constantly fixing mistakes or making things more clear. So if you read this book in August of 2019, chances are it is different when you read it in September 2019. Ebooks allow authors the freedom to improve their textbooks on a ongoing basis.

The 1st year college math should be about the math that prepares any and all students for science, whether they branch out into physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, or math, they should have all the math in 1st year college that will carry them through those science studies. I make every attempt possible to make math easy to understand, easy to learn and hopefully fun.

Product details

• ASIN : B07WN9RVXD

• Publication date : August 16, 2019

• Language : English

• File size : 1390 KB

• Simultaneous device usage : Unlimited

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #1,377,070 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #411 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

◦ #2,480 in Calculus (Books)

#5-4, 56th published book

COLLEGE CALCULUS GUIDE to help students recognize math professor spam from math truth & reality// math textbook series, book 4 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

#1 New Releasein 15-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

This textbook is the companion guide book to AP's Teaching True Mathematics, 1st year College. It is realized that Old Math will take a long time in removing their fake math, so in the interim period, this Guide book is designed to speed up the process of removing fake Calculus out of the education system, the fewer students we punish with forcing them with fake Calculus, the better we are.

Cover Picture: This book is part comedy, for when you cannot reason with math professors that they have many errors to fix, that 90% of their Calculus is in error, you end up resorting to comedy, making fun of them, to prod them to fix their errors. To prod them to "do right by the students of the world" not their entrenched propaganda.

Length: 54 pages

Product details

File Size: 1035 KB

Print Length: 64 pages

Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited

Publication Date: August 18, 2019

Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC

Language: English

ASIN: B07WNGLQ85

Text-to-Speech: Enabled ￼

Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled ￼

Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #253,425 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)

#38 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

#318 in Calculus (Books)

#48 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

#5-5, 72nd published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 4 for age 19-20 Sophomore-year College, math textbook series, book 5 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface: This is volume 4, book 5 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Sophomore-year students, students of age 19-20. It is the continuation of volume 3 in the end-goal of learning how to do the mathematics of electricity and magnetism, because everything in physics is nothing but atoms and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. To know math, you have to know physics. We learned the Calculus of 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. But we did not learn the calculus of those equations for 3rd dimension. So, you can say that Sophomore year College math is devoted to 3D Calculus. This sophomore year college we fill in all the calculus, and we start over on all of Geometry, for geometry needs a modern day revision. And pardon me for this book is mostly reading, and the students doing less calculations. The classroom of this textbook has the teacher go through page by page to get the students comprehending and understanding of what is being taught. There are many hands on experiments also.

Cover Picture shows some toruses, some round some square, torus of rings, thin strips of rings or squares and shows them laid flat. That is Calculus of 3rd dimension that lays a ring in a torus to be flat in 2nd dimension.

Length: 105 pages

Product details

• ASIN : B0828M34VL

• Publication date : December 2, 2019

• Language : English

• File size : 952 KB

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #242,037 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #36 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

◦ #219 in Calculus (Books)

#5-6, 75th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 5 for age 20-21 Junior-year of College, math textbook series, book 6 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium 2019

This is volume 5, book 6 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Junior-year students, students of age 20-21. In first year college Calculus we learned calculus of the 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. And in sophomore year we learned calculus of 3rd dimension to complete our study of the mathematics needed to do the physics of electricity and magnetism. Now, junior year college, we move onto something different, for we focus mostly on logic now and especially the logic of what is called the "mathematical proof". Much of what the student has learned about mathematics so far has been given to her or him as stated knowledge, accept it as true because I say so. But now we are going to do math proofs. Oh, yes, we did prove a few items here and there, such as why the Decimal Grid Number system is so special, such as the Pythagorean Theorem, such as the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with its right-triangle hinged up or down. But many ideas we did not prove, we just stated them and expected all students to believe them true. And you are now juniors in college and we are going to start to prove many of those ideas and teach you "what is a math proof". Personally, I myself feel that the math proof is overrated, over hyped. But the math proof is important for one reason-- it makes you better scientists of knowing what is true and what is a shaky idea. A math proof is the same as "thinking straight and thinking clearly". And all scientists need to think straight and think clearly. But before we get to the Mathematics Proof, we have to do Probability and Statistics. What you learned in Grade School, then High School, then College, called Sigma Error, now becomes Probability and Statistics. It is important because all sciences including mathematics needs and uses Probability and Statistics. So, our job for junior-year of college mathematics is all cut out and ahead for us, no time to waste, let us get going.

Cover Picture: is a sample of the Array Proof, a proof the ellipse is not a conic but rather a cylinder cut wherein the oval is the slant cut of a cone, not the ellipse.

Length: 175 pages

Product details

ASIN : B0836F1YF6

Publication date : December 26, 2019

Language : English

File size : 741 KB

Lending : Enabled

Best Sellers Rank: #3,768,255 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #3,591 in Probability & Statistics (Kindle Store)

◦ #19,091 in Probability & Statistics (Books)

#5-7, 89th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 6 for age 21-22 Senior-year of College, math textbook series, book 7 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium 2020

Last revision was 6Feb2021.

Preface: This is the last year of College for mathematics and we have to mostly summarize all of mathematics as best we can. And set a new pattern to prepare students going on to math graduate school. A new pattern of work habits, because graduate school is more of research and explore on your own. So in this final year, I am going to eliminate tests, and have it mostly done as homework assignments.

Cover Picture: Again and again, many times in math, the mind is not good enough alone to think straight and clear, and you need tools to hands-on see how it works. Here is a collection of tools for this senior year college classes. There is a pencil, clipboard, graph paper, compass, divider, protractor, slide-ruler. And for this year we spend a lot of time on the parallelepiped, showing my wood model, and showing my erector set model held together by wire loops in the corners. The plastic square is there only to hold up the erector set model.

Length: 110 pages

Product details

ASIN : B084V11BGY

Publication date : February 15, 2020

Language : English

File size : 826 KB

Lending : Enabled

Best Sellers Rank: #224,965 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #345 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)

◦ #373 in Physics (Kindle Store)

◦ #2,256 in Physics (Books)

#5-8, 90th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 7 for age 22-26 Graduate school, math textbook series, book 8 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium 2020

Last revised 1NOV2020. This was AP's 90th published book of science.

Preface: This is College Graduate School mathematics. Congratulations, you made it this far. To me, graduate school is mostly research, research mathematics and that means also physics. So it is going to be difficult to do math without physics. Of course, we focus on the mathematics of these research projects.

My textbook for Graduate school is just a template and the professors teaching the graduate students are free of course to follow their own projects, but in terms of being physics and math combined. What I list below is a template for possible projects.

So, in the below projects, I list 36 possible research projects that a graduate student my like to undertake, or partake. I list those 36 projects with a set of parentheses like this (1), (2), (3), etc. Not to be confused with the chapters listing as 1), 2), 3), etc. I list 36 projects but the professor can offer his/her own list, and I expect students with their professor, to pick a project and to monitor the student as to his/her progresses through the research. I have listed each project then cited some of my own research into these projects, below each project is an entry. Those entries are just a help or helper in getting started or acquainted with the project. The entry has a date time group and a newsgroup that I posted to such as sci.math or plutonium-atom-universe Google newsgroups. Again the entry is just a help or helper in getting started.

Now instead of picking one or two projects for your Graduate years of study, some may select all 36 projects where you write a short paper on each project. Some may be bored with just one or two projects and opt for all 36.

Cover Picture: A photo by my iphone of a page on Permutations of the Jacobs book Mathematics: A Human Endeavor, 1970. One of the best textbooks ever written in Old Math, not for its contents because there are many errors, but for its teaching style. It is extremely rare to find a math textbook written for the student to learn. Probably because math professors rarely learned how to teach in the first place; only learned how to unintentionally obfuscate. The page I photographed is important because it is the interface between geometry's perimeter or surface area versus geometry's area or volume, respectively. Or, an interface of pure numbers with that of geometry. But I have more to say on this below.

Length: 296 pages

Product details

ASIN : B085DF8R7V

Publication date : March 1, 2020

Language : English

File size : 828 KB

Lending : Enabled

Best Sellers Rank: #224,981 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #13 in General Geometry

◦ #213 in Geometry & Topology (Books)

#5-9, 221st published book

An Education Ladder Guideline for teaching mathematics and a Test to see if you are cut out to be a mathematician//Teaching True Mathematics

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Preface: This book is written to improve math education in school and at home. Trouble is, you cannot improve math education if the professors of mathematics have much of their teachings in error. So I write this book mostly as a test for math professors because to shine a light on math professor failure is the best way to improve math teaching, and thereby improve school curriculums especially colleges and universities. But others, such as laypersons are welcomed to join in. And it is the laypersons and students that will make the greatest amount of use of this book because math professors are usually stubborn and idiotic and hard to change for the better. And so when students and laypersons keep asking questions of their math professors, their brainwashing and thus poor teaching, they eventually come around to the truth and then change their bad behavior and bad misunderstanding; to proper true mathematics.

Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of a rubber washer inside a plastic cone. The washer is at a steep slant angle to the cone perpendicular. Notice the washer near the apex is fully touching the side of the cone, but the washer directed towards the base has not yet cut through the side of the cone, and you can see a rainbow or a crescent shape of area where the washer will intersect the side of the cone, (where my two finger are), making a total figure of a Oval, never the ellipse. I was taking this picture as one person, so I had the iphone camera in one hand and the cone in another hand, and had to use a rubber washer to stay in place. The same green plastic cone used in this picture appears in both of my published books of the proof slant cut of cone is oval, never the ellipse.

My 3rd published book with the same green cone on cover.

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

My 68th published book with the same green cone on cover.

Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Product details

• ASIN : B0BQDYMYKQ

• Publication date : December 16, 2022

• Language : English

• File size : 551 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe

• Print length : 65 pages

#5-10, 160th published book

MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic

by Archimedes Plutonium

Preface:

A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.

The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.

The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.

Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.

I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).

Product details

• ASIN : B09MZTLRL5 and ASIN : B09ZWFLKHC

• Publication date : December 2, 2021

• Product details

• ASIN : B09ZWFLKHC

• Publication date : May 8, 2022

• Language : English

• File size : 1154 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe

• Print length : 71 pages

>

On Sunday, October 13, 1996 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Terence Tao wrote:

> Uh, it depends on what you mean by "partial derivative with respect to A".

> This is somewhat ambiguous when A is allowed to be complex. Especially

> considering that f_B(A) = tr(A^+ B A) is not a holomorphic function of A.

> Once you have settled on an acceptable definition of partial derivative,

> it should be easy to answer your question. Note that

> f_B(A + dA) - f_B(A) = tr(dA^+ BA) + tr(dA A^+ B) + O(|dA|^2)

> Terry

AP writes: Laughable how the failure of math Terry Tao giving advice on calculus, when he cannot tell the difference between Oval and ellipse, and too dishonest to admit slant cut of Cone is Oval, not the ellipse. This would answer why Dr. Tao is too stupid in math to realize Calculus is geometry and needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, not the oaf Terry with his "limit analysis" hornswaggle which says rectangle widths are 0 widths-- with the contradiction of rectangles of no interior error. But then Terry probably never studied logic in school, never learned how to think straight, and think clear, and it shows in his stupid Reductio Ad Absurdum of the Tao-Green phony theorem.

First, Terry has to learn to be "honest in science"-- admit his mistakes of conic sections, otherwise he fades into oblivion with his error filled garbage math.

AP

Kibo Parry (Moroney-Volney) on Dr.Tao

On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 11:27:58 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

>"mindless barking fuckdog"
> "math hater"

> fails at math and science:

> Why do you refuse to explain your illogical "syllogism"? Is it because

> you have no evidence for it? Because you know it is false?

>

Kibo, chill out, not so hard on Dr. Tao for he prefers to run and hide when he should be admitting that the slant cut of cone is a Oval, never the ellipse. Dr. Tao enjoys limelight and fortune and fame and thinks "truth of math and science is not important, just secondary while soaking up fame and fortune".
> Why do you refuse to explain your illogical "syllogism"? Is it because

> you have no evidence for it? Because you know it is false?

>

On Sunday, May 13, 2018 at 8:41:41 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

> Archimedes "failure" Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails:

>

> >So, Terence Tao, every day you are quiet and silent about Ellipse is a

> >Cylinder section, never a Conic section, is every day you are silent

> >means you agree that a Ellipse is a Conic,

>

> First of all, Terence Tao has almost never heard of, or cares about a

Kibo, you attacked and stalked AP for 30 years nonstop, are you going to attack and stalk anti-math Dr. Tao and anti-math Dr. Wiles for 30 years nonstop??

Kibo why do you hate the Pope with your constant reference to the Pope?? Is it your necrophilia, Kibo Parry, that you hate the Pope?? Or is it because the Catholic Church schools denied your entrance for the stalker-sinner you are and that is why you failed math and science?

Kibo blaming others> Why are you attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you

> hold an evil false god before God, but that's no reason to hate their

> pope. Is it because the pope (and past popes) said gay people like

> yourself will go to hell or something? Did he say something about your

> necrophilia? I am unaware of any papal statement about necrophilia, but

> certainly he'd disapprove of your necrophilia!

>

Kibo > You have been claiming this silliness, without proof, for some 30 years.

AP writes: Kibo I recommend you write a letter to the Pope asking for forgiveness of using his name in your daily "hate speech spew on Usenet". I am sure the Pope will forgive you of your sins.

Kibo, chill out, Archimedes Plutonium proved slant cut of cone was Oval, never ellipse and a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, neither of which Dr. Tao can admit the truth, he just runs and hides. Does UCLA have enough hiding spots for Dr. Tao????

My 134th published book

Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had already written the series of TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS in a 7 volume, 8 book set. This would be the first book in that 8 book set (one of the books is a companion book to 1st year college). But I suppose that I needed to write the full series before I could write the Introduction and know what I had to talk about and talk about in a logical progression order. Sounds paradoxical in a sense, that I needed to write the full series first and then go back and write the Introduction. But in another sense, hard to write an introduction on something you have not really fully done and completed. For example to know what is error filled Old Math and to list those errors in a logical order requires me to write the full 7 volumes in order to list in order the mistakes.

Cover Picture: Mathematics begins with counting, with numbers, with quantity. But counting numbers needs geometry for something to count in the first place. So here in this picture of the generalized Hydrogen atom of chemistry and physics is a torus geometry of 8 rings of a proton torus and one ring where my fingers are, is a equator ring that is the muon and thrusting through the proton torus at the equator of the torus. So we count 9 rings in all. So math is created by atoms and math numbers exist because atoms have many geometry figures to count. And geometry exists because atoms have shapes and different figures.

Product details

• ASIN : B08K2XQB4M

• Publication date : September 24, 2020

• Language : English

• File size : 576 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Print length : 23 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #224,974 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #3 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

◦ #23 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

◦ #182 in Calculus (Books)

#5-2, 45th published

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon Kindle edition)

Last revision was 2NOV2020. And this is AP's 45th published book of science.

Preface: Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education.

This is a textbook series in several volumes that carries every person through all his/her math education starting age 5 up to age 26. Volume 2 is for age 5 year old to that of senior in High School, that is needed to do both science and math. Every other math book is incidental to this series of Teaching True Mathematics.

It is a journal-textbook because Amazon's Kindle offers me the ability to edit overnight, and to change the text, almost on a daily basis. A unique first in education textbooks-- almost a continual overnight editing. Adding new text, correcting text. Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education. Volume 3 carries the Freshperson in College for their math calculus education.

Cover Picture: The Numbers as Integers from 0 to 100, and 10 Grid when dividing by 10, and part of the 100 Grid when dividing by 100. Decimal Grid Numbers are the true numbers of mathematics. The Reals, the rationals & irrationals, the algebraic & transcendentals, the imaginary & Complex, and the negative-numbers are all fake numbers. For, to be a true number, you have to "be counted" by mathematical induction. The smallest Grid system is the Decimal 10 Grid.

Product details

ASIN : B07RG7BVZW

Publication date : May 2, 2019

Language : English

File size : 2024 KB

Text-to-Speech : Enabled

Screen Reader : Supported

Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

X-Ray : Not Enabled

Word Wise : Not Enabled

Print length : 423 pages
Screen Reader : Supported

Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

X-Ray : Not Enabled

Word Wise : Not Enabled

Lending : Enabled

Best Sellers Rank: #235,426 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

#15 in General Geometry

#223 in Geometry & Topology (Books)

#5-3, 55th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 25Jun2021. And this is AP's 55th published book of science.

Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019

Preface: This is volume 3, book 3 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Freshperson students, 1st year college students of age 18-19. It is the continuation of volume 2 for ages 5 through 18 years old.

The main major topic is the AP-EM equations of electricity and magnetism, the mathematics for the laws of electricity and magnetism; what used to be called the Maxwell Equations of Physics. The 1st Year College Math has to prepare all students with the math for all the sciences. So 1st year college Math is like a huge intersection station that has to prepare students with the math they need to do the hard sciences such as physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, geology, etc. What this means is, 1st year college is calculus that allows the student to work with electricity and magnetism. All the math that is needed to enable students to do electricity and magnetism. In Old Math before this textbook, those Old Math textbooks would end in 1/3 of the text about Arclength, vector space, div, curl, Line Integral, Green's, Stokes, Divergence theorem trying to reach and be able to teach Maxwell Equations. But sadly, barely any Old Math classroom reached that 1/3 ending of the textbook, and left all those college students without any math to tackle electricity and magnetism. And most of Old Math was just muddle headed wrong even if they covered the last 1/3 of the textbook. And that is totally unacceptable in science. This textbook fixes that huge hole and gap in Old Math education.

And there is no way around it, that a course in 1st year College Calculus is going to do a lot of hands on experiment with electricity and magnetism, and is required of the students to buy a list of physics apparatus-- multimeter, galvanometer, coil, bar magnet, alligator clip wires, electromagnet, iron filing case, and possibly even a 12 volt transformer, all shown in the cover picture. The beginning of this textbook and the middle section all leads into the ending of this textbook-- we learn the AP-EM Equations and how to use those equations. And there is no escaping the fact that it has to be hands on physics experiments in the classroom of mathematics.

But, do not be scared, for this is all easy easy easy. For if you passed and enjoyed Volume 2 TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, then I promise you, you will not be stressed with Volume 3, for I go out of my way to make it clear and understandable.

Warning: this is a Journal Textbook, meaning that I am constantly adding new material, constantly revising, constantly fixing mistakes or making things more clear. So if you read this book in August of 2019, chances are it is different when you read it in September 2019. Ebooks allow authors the freedom to improve their textbooks on a ongoing basis.

The 1st year college math should be about the math that prepares any and all students for science, whether they branch out into physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, or math, they should have all the math in 1st year college that will carry them through those science studies. I make every attempt possible to make math easy to understand, easy to learn and hopefully fun.

Product details

• ASIN : B07WN9RVXD

• Publication date : August 16, 2019

• Language : English

• File size : 1390 KB

• Simultaneous device usage : Unlimited

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Print length : 236 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #1,377,070 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #411 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

◦ #2,480 in Calculus (Books)

#5-4, 56th published book

COLLEGE CALCULUS GUIDE to help students recognize math professor spam from math truth & reality// math textbook series, book 4 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

#1 New Releasein 15-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

This textbook is the companion guide book to AP's Teaching True Mathematics, 1st year College. It is realized that Old Math will take a long time in removing their fake math, so in the interim period, this Guide book is designed to speed up the process of removing fake Calculus out of the education system, the fewer students we punish with forcing them with fake Calculus, the better we are.

Cover Picture: This book is part comedy, for when you cannot reason with math professors that they have many errors to fix, that 90% of their Calculus is in error, you end up resorting to comedy, making fun of them, to prod them to fix their errors. To prod them to "do right by the students of the world" not their entrenched propaganda.

Length: 54 pages

Product details

File Size: 1035 KB

Print Length: 64 pages

Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited

Publication Date: August 18, 2019

Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC

Language: English

ASIN: B07WNGLQ85

Text-to-Speech: Enabled ￼

X-Ray:
Not Enabled ￼

Word Wise: Not Enabled

Lending: Enabled
Word Wise: Not Enabled

Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled ￼

Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #253,425 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)

#38 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

#318 in Calculus (Books)

#48 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

#5-5, 72nd published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 4 for age 19-20 Sophomore-year College, math textbook series, book 5 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface: This is volume 4, book 5 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Sophomore-year students, students of age 19-20. It is the continuation of volume 3 in the end-goal of learning how to do the mathematics of electricity and magnetism, because everything in physics is nothing but atoms and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. To know math, you have to know physics. We learned the Calculus of 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. But we did not learn the calculus of those equations for 3rd dimension. So, you can say that Sophomore year College math is devoted to 3D Calculus. This sophomore year college we fill in all the calculus, and we start over on all of Geometry, for geometry needs a modern day revision. And pardon me for this book is mostly reading, and the students doing less calculations. The classroom of this textbook has the teacher go through page by page to get the students comprehending and understanding of what is being taught. There are many hands on experiments also.

Cover Picture shows some toruses, some round some square, torus of rings, thin strips of rings or squares and shows them laid flat. That is Calculus of 3rd dimension that lays a ring in a torus to be flat in 2nd dimension.

Length: 105 pages

Product details

• ASIN : B0828M34VL

• Publication date : December 2, 2019

• Language : English

• File size : 952 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Print length : 105 pages
• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #242,037 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #36 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

◦ #219 in Calculus (Books)

#5-6, 75th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 5 for age 20-21 Junior-year of College, math textbook series, book 6 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium 2019

This is volume 5, book 6 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Junior-year students, students of age 20-21. In first year college Calculus we learned calculus of the 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. And in sophomore year we learned calculus of 3rd dimension to complete our study of the mathematics needed to do the physics of electricity and magnetism. Now, junior year college, we move onto something different, for we focus mostly on logic now and especially the logic of what is called the "mathematical proof". Much of what the student has learned about mathematics so far has been given to her or him as stated knowledge, accept it as true because I say so. But now we are going to do math proofs. Oh, yes, we did prove a few items here and there, such as why the Decimal Grid Number system is so special, such as the Pythagorean Theorem, such as the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with its right-triangle hinged up or down. But many ideas we did not prove, we just stated them and expected all students to believe them true. And you are now juniors in college and we are going to start to prove many of those ideas and teach you "what is a math proof". Personally, I myself feel that the math proof is overrated, over hyped. But the math proof is important for one reason-- it makes you better scientists of knowing what is true and what is a shaky idea. A math proof is the same as "thinking straight and thinking clearly". And all scientists need to think straight and think clearly. But before we get to the Mathematics Proof, we have to do Probability and Statistics. What you learned in Grade School, then High School, then College, called Sigma Error, now becomes Probability and Statistics. It is important because all sciences including mathematics needs and uses Probability and Statistics. So, our job for junior-year of college mathematics is all cut out and ahead for us, no time to waste, let us get going.

Cover Picture: is a sample of the Array Proof, a proof the ellipse is not a conic but rather a cylinder cut wherein the oval is the slant cut of a cone, not the ellipse.

Length: 175 pages

Product details

ASIN : B0836F1YF6

Publication date : December 26, 2019

Language : English

File size : 741 KB

Text-to-Speech : Enabled

Screen Reader : Supported

Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

X-Ray : Not Enabled

Word Wise : Not Enabled

Print length : 175 pages
Screen Reader : Supported

Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

X-Ray : Not Enabled

Word Wise : Not Enabled

Lending : Enabled

Best Sellers Rank: #3,768,255 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #3,591 in Probability & Statistics (Kindle Store)

◦ #19,091 in Probability & Statistics (Books)

#5-7, 89th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 6 for age 21-22 Senior-year of College, math textbook series, book 7 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium 2020

Last revision was 6Feb2021.

Preface: This is the last year of College for mathematics and we have to mostly summarize all of mathematics as best we can. And set a new pattern to prepare students going on to math graduate school. A new pattern of work habits, because graduate school is more of research and explore on your own. So in this final year, I am going to eliminate tests, and have it mostly done as homework assignments.

Cover Picture: Again and again, many times in math, the mind is not good enough alone to think straight and clear, and you need tools to hands-on see how it works. Here is a collection of tools for this senior year college classes. There is a pencil, clipboard, graph paper, compass, divider, protractor, slide-ruler. And for this year we spend a lot of time on the parallelepiped, showing my wood model, and showing my erector set model held together by wire loops in the corners. The plastic square is there only to hold up the erector set model.

Length: 110 pages

Product details

ASIN : B084V11BGY

Publication date : February 15, 2020

Language : English

File size : 826 KB

Text-to-Speech : Enabled

Screen Reader : Supported

Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

X-Ray : Not Enabled

Word Wise : Enabled

Print length : 110 pages
Screen Reader : Supported

Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

X-Ray : Not Enabled

Word Wise : Enabled

Lending : Enabled

Best Sellers Rank: #224,965 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #345 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)

◦ #373 in Physics (Kindle Store)

◦ #2,256 in Physics (Books)

#5-8, 90th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 7 for age 22-26 Graduate school, math textbook series, book 8 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium 2020

Last revised 1NOV2020. This was AP's 90th published book of science.

Preface: This is College Graduate School mathematics. Congratulations, you made it this far. To me, graduate school is mostly research, research mathematics and that means also physics. So it is going to be difficult to do math without physics. Of course, we focus on the mathematics of these research projects.

My textbook for Graduate school is just a template and the professors teaching the graduate students are free of course to follow their own projects, but in terms of being physics and math combined. What I list below is a template for possible projects.

So, in the below projects, I list 36 possible research projects that a graduate student my like to undertake, or partake. I list those 36 projects with a set of parentheses like this (1), (2), (3), etc. Not to be confused with the chapters listing as 1), 2), 3), etc. I list 36 projects but the professor can offer his/her own list, and I expect students with their professor, to pick a project and to monitor the student as to his/her progresses through the research. I have listed each project then cited some of my own research into these projects, below each project is an entry. Those entries are just a help or helper in getting started or acquainted with the project. The entry has a date time group and a newsgroup that I posted to such as sci.math or plutonium-atom-universe Google newsgroups. Again the entry is just a help or helper in getting started.

Now instead of picking one or two projects for your Graduate years of study, some may select all 36 projects where you write a short paper on each project. Some may be bored with just one or two projects and opt for all 36.

Cover Picture: A photo by my iphone of a page on Permutations of the Jacobs book Mathematics: A Human Endeavor, 1970. One of the best textbooks ever written in Old Math, not for its contents because there are many errors, but for its teaching style. It is extremely rare to find a math textbook written for the student to learn. Probably because math professors rarely learned how to teach in the first place; only learned how to unintentionally obfuscate. The page I photographed is important because it is the interface between geometry's perimeter or surface area versus geometry's area or volume, respectively. Or, an interface of pure numbers with that of geometry. But I have more to say on this below.

Length: 296 pages

Product details

ASIN : B085DF8R7V

Publication date : March 1, 2020

Language : English

File size : 828 KB

Text-to-Speech : Enabled

Screen Reader : Supported

Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

X-Ray : Not Enabled

Word Wise : Not Enabled

Print length : 296 pages
Screen Reader : Supported

Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

X-Ray : Not Enabled

Word Wise : Not Enabled

Lending : Enabled

Best Sellers Rank: #224,981 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)

◦ #13 in General Geometry

◦ #213 in Geometry & Topology (Books)

#5-9, 221st published book

An Education Ladder Guideline for teaching mathematics and a Test to see if you are cut out to be a mathematician//Teaching True Mathematics

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Preface: This book is written to improve math education in school and at home. Trouble is, you cannot improve math education if the professors of mathematics have much of their teachings in error. So I write this book mostly as a test for math professors because to shine a light on math professor failure is the best way to improve math teaching, and thereby improve school curriculums especially colleges and universities. But others, such as laypersons are welcomed to join in. And it is the laypersons and students that will make the greatest amount of use of this book because math professors are usually stubborn and idiotic and hard to change for the better. And so when students and laypersons keep asking questions of their math professors, their brainwashing and thus poor teaching, they eventually come around to the truth and then change their bad behavior and bad misunderstanding; to proper true mathematics.

Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of a rubber washer inside a plastic cone. The washer is at a steep slant angle to the cone perpendicular. Notice the washer near the apex is fully touching the side of the cone, but the washer directed towards the base has not yet cut through the side of the cone, and you can see a rainbow or a crescent shape of area where the washer will intersect the side of the cone, (where my two finger are), making a total figure of a Oval, never the ellipse. I was taking this picture as one person, so I had the iphone camera in one hand and the cone in another hand, and had to use a rubber washer to stay in place. The same green plastic cone used in this picture appears in both of my published books of the proof slant cut of cone is oval, never the ellipse.

My 3rd published book with the same green cone on cover.

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

My 68th published book with the same green cone on cover.

Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Product details

• ASIN : B0BQDYMYKQ

• Publication date : December 16, 2022

• Language : English

• File size : 551 KB

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Print length : 65 pages

#5-10, 160th published book

MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic

by Archimedes Plutonium

Preface:

A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.

The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.

The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.

Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.

I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).

Product details

• ASIN : B09MZTLRL5 and ASIN : B09ZWFLKHC

• Publication date : December 2, 2021

• Product details

• ASIN : B09ZWFLKHC

• Publication date : May 8, 2022

• Language : English

• File size : 1154 KB

• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Print length : 71 pages

>

On Sunday, October 13, 1996 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Terence Tao wrote:

> Uh, it depends on what you mean by "partial derivative with respect to A".

> This is somewhat ambiguous when A is allowed to be complex. Especially

> considering that f_B(A) = tr(A^+ B A) is not a holomorphic function of A.

> Once you have settled on an acceptable definition of partial derivative,

> it should be easy to answer your question. Note that

> f_B(A + dA) - f_B(A) = tr(dA^+ BA) + tr(dA A^+ B) + O(|dA|^2)

> Terry

AP writes: Laughable how the failure of math Terry Tao giving advice on calculus, when he cannot tell the difference between Oval and ellipse, and too dishonest to admit slant cut of Cone is Oval, not the ellipse. This would answer why Dr. Tao is too stupid in math to realize Calculus is geometry and needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, not the oaf Terry with his "limit analysis" hornswaggle which says rectangle widths are 0 widths-- with the contradiction of rectangles of no interior error. But then Terry probably never studied logic in school, never learned how to think straight, and think clear, and it shows in his stupid Reductio Ad Absurdum of the Tao-Green phony theorem.

First, Terry has to learn to be "honest in science"-- admit his mistakes of conic sections, otherwise he fades into oblivion with his error filled garbage math.

AP

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

Message has been deleted

It is loading more messages.

0 new messages