Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Terence Tao math con-artist UCLA with fake and nonsense Tao-Green, why Tao is so dumb in logic he never realized Primes was ill-defined under division, hence nonexistent, but his worst stupidity-- cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ell
60 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Y A
Jan 9, 2023, 3:45:41 AM1/9/23
to
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀🌞⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀🌞⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ 🛩
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀🌧️🌧️🌧️⠀⠀🌧️🌧️⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀🌧️🌧️🌧️⠀⠀🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️⠀⠀🌧️🌧️⠀⠀⠀🌧️🌧️🌧️⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀🕊️ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀🌴⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀🍄 ⠀⠀⠀⠀ 🌼⠀⠀⠀⠀ 🌻
🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫
On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 8:18:10 AM UTC+2, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Terry was unaware that calculus was geometry, and it simply went over his head, air head that Calculus Fundamental Theorem required a geometry proof, but then again, Terry so dumb in math probably thought that a limit-analysis serves as a geometry proof. This is what I mean that manufacturing in college of math professors who are never required to take Logic, is a end result of math failure.
Mostowski Collapse
Jan 12, 2023, 6:16:14 PM1/12/23
to
Q: Is an oval a conic section?
A: An oval is not a conic section. A conic section
is the intersection of a plane with a cone. The four
types of conic sections are the circle, ellipse, parabola,
and hyperbola. An oval is a shape that is similar to an
ellipse but is not mathematically defined as a conic section.
A: An oval is not a conic section. A conic section
is the intersection of a plane with a cone. The four
types of conic sections are the circle, ellipse, parabola,
and hyperbola. An oval is a shape that is similar to an
ellipse but is not mathematically defined as a conic section.
Mostowski Collapse
Jan 12, 2023, 6:19:47 PM1/12/23
to
Q: How is an oval defined?
A: An oval is a closed, symmetrical shape that is similar to an
ellipse but does not have a precise mathematical definition. It
is often described as an elongated circle or a flattened sphere.
In common usage, the term "oval" is often used to refer to shapes
that are approximately ellipsoidal in shape, but may not have the
precise mathematical properties of an ellipse.
LoL
https://chat.openai.com/chat
A: An oval is a closed, symmetrical shape that is similar to an
ellipse but does not have a precise mathematical definition. It
is often described as an elongated circle or a flattened sphere.
In common usage, the term "oval" is often used to refer to shapes
that are approximately ellipsoidal in shape, but may not have the
precise mathematical properties of an ellipse.
LoL
https://chat.openai.com/chat
Mostowski Collapse
Jan 12, 2023, 6:22:24 PM1/12/23
to
This was only the warm-up. Now its getting interesting:
Q: Is an eggshaped two dimensional curve an oval?
A: An egg-shaped two-dimensional curve is similar to
an oval, but it is not mathematically defined as an oval.
An oval is a shape that is similar to an ellipse but does
not have a precise mathematical definition. An egg-shaped
curve is typically an oblong shape, similar to an ellipse, but
with one end that is more rounded or pointed than the other.
It can be considered as a oval in informal usage, but it
doesn't have strict mathematical definition.
Q: What are the names of shapes that resemble an ellipse?
A: Shapes that resemble an ellipse but are not mathematically
defined as an ellipse are often called ovals. Some other
shapes that are similar to an ellipse include:
Egg-shaped
Ovate
Elliptical
Oblong
Prolate
Spheroid
Almond-shaped
Pear-shaped
Teardrop-shaped
These terms are often used informally, and the exact definition
can vary depending on the context.
Woa! Cool!
Q: Is an eggshaped two dimensional curve an oval?
A: An egg-shaped two-dimensional curve is similar to
an oval, but it is not mathematically defined as an oval.
An oval is a shape that is similar to an ellipse but does
not have a precise mathematical definition. An egg-shaped
curve is typically an oblong shape, similar to an ellipse, but
with one end that is more rounded or pointed than the other.
It can be considered as a oval in informal usage, but it
doesn't have strict mathematical definition.
Q: What are the names of shapes that resemble an ellipse?
A: Shapes that resemble an ellipse but are not mathematically
defined as an ellipse are often called ovals. Some other
shapes that are similar to an ellipse include:
Egg-shaped
Ovate
Elliptical
Oblong
Prolate
Spheroid
Almond-shaped
Pear-shaped
Teardrop-shaped
These terms are often used informally, and the exact definition
can vary depending on the context.
Woa! Cool!
FromTheRafters
Jan 12, 2023, 8:25:42 PM1/12/23
to
Another source says a closed curve with no three points collinear and
has a derivative everywhere. I like that one myself. No dents corners
discontunuities or cusps to deal with. But then, a shark egg is no
longer egg shaped.
Another misconception (demonstrated by AP) is that having two axes of
symmetry is enough for it to be an ellipse, it isn't. Use a compass
(divider and stylus) and draw what would otherwise be a circle if it
were not being drawn on the side of a larger diameter cylinder. Then
flatten the cylinder and see an oval. In grade school my art teacher
said it was an ellipse and we had a discussion ending with me going to
see the guidance councilor.
The distance from f1 to the curve and on to f2 is not constant on that
oval because of the cylinder's curved nature. Do the same thing with
the string method and it is still a circle because the metric is on the
surface.
Mostowski Collapse formulated on Thursday :
has a derivative everywhere. I like that one myself. No dents corners
discontunuities or cusps to deal with. But then, a shark egg is no
longer egg shaped.
Another misconception (demonstrated by AP) is that having two axes of
symmetry is enough for it to be an ellipse, it isn't. Use a compass
(divider and stylus) and draw what would otherwise be a circle if it
were not being drawn on the side of a larger diameter cylinder. Then
flatten the cylinder and see an oval. In grade school my art teacher
said it was an ellipse and we had a discussion ending with me going to
see the guidance councilor.
The distance from f1 to the curve and on to f2 is not constant on that
oval because of the cylinder's curved nature. Do the same thing with
the string method and it is still a circle because the metric is on the
surface.
Mostowski Collapse formulated on Thursday :
Archimedes Plutonium
Jan 12, 2023, 8:41:55 PM1/12/23
to
On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 7:25:42 PM UTC-6, FromTheRafters wrote:
> Another source says a closed curve with no three points collinear and
> has a derivative everywhere. I like that one myself.
Yes, an ignorant math failure of Rafters would like a definition that does _not_ differentiate a oval from 1,000 other curves. Does Rafters even have a 1/2 marble of logic to understand we need definitions that differentiate, not smear out and make obscure.
> Another source says a closed curve with no three points collinear and
> has a derivative everywhere. I like that one myself.
>No dents corners
> discontunuities or cusps to deal with. But then, a shark egg is no
> longer egg shaped.
>
> Another misconception (demonstrated by AP) is that having two axes of
> symmetry is enough for it to be an ellipse, it isn't. Use a compass
Rafters is a mindless worthless spamming sci.math fuckdog, end of story
Archimedes Plutonium
Jan 12, 2023, 8:55:35 PM1/12/23
to
Even math failure Jan Burse can admit oval is conic,not UCLA Dr.Tao. Even Jan Burse can take a paper cone and place a coin in it at a slant and see the lower portions are asymmetrical with upper near apex portion. But why cannot UCLA oaf Dr. Tao admit to the truth-- probably all because he hates to see AP excell. Jeolosy make Tao a idiot of math.
Mostowski Collapse
Jan 13, 2023, 6:01:29 AM1/13/23
to
Now I will not use ChatGPT anymore. The bloody thing threw me
out after 1 hour chatting, saying it wont answer any questions
anymore, I have reached my quota.
But I had an interesting conversation with ChatGPT. It knew quite
some stuff about diophantine equations. But it didn't know that
meanwhile somebody has found a solution for:
x^2 + y^2 = z^2 + 42
Was this before or after 2021?
out after 1 hour chatting, saying it wont answer any questions
anymore, I have reached my quota.
But I had an interesting conversation with ChatGPT. It knew quite
some stuff about diophantine equations. But it didn't know that
meanwhile somebody has found a solution for:
x^2 + y^2 = z^2 + 42
Was this before or after 2021?
Mostowski Collapse
Jan 13, 2023, 6:03:09 AM1/13/23
to
Corr.:
x^3 + y^3 = z^3 + 42
x^3 + y^3 = z^3 + 42
0 new messages