Archimedes Plutonium
unread,May 19, 2022, 4:35:56 PM5/19/22You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Sign in to report message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
Stimulation in biology is far far different than that of "becoming young once again". I remember when Trump got off the plane after treatment for covid virus, and the treatment involved some high stimulants. And of course Trump would have rejoiced in this "being made young again-- in feelings". But Trump was not turned back or turned around in ageing, no, all that Trump experienced was a euphoric high from drugs that stimulated is present old body to seem like it felt 20 or 30 years younger.
I know when I was on a vacation more than 2 decades ago visiting American southwest deserts, I too had a euphoric high feeling on getting a jug of carbonated cold pure spring water and guzzling that down, feeling the water coursing through my arteries and blood vessels. Did it make me younger?? Of course not. And this is what the researchers involved in the New Scientist, 30Apr2022 article "Ageing Upturned" are mistaken and in error over. They fail to realize there is a vast difference between body stimulation and body reversing of age. And the experiment that these bonehead fake interpretation should have looked at most carefully is the experiment of putting Young mouse blood into Old mice and seeing they behaved better. Well, they were stimulated, just as Trump was stimulated. And the blood experiment goes directly counter to the theme of this research hypothesis, for young blood is -- growth development blood. If the Young blood had made the old mice -- even more older, then there is no contradiction to their silly theory. But the young blood did just the exact opposite -- made them feel better. And that proves these experiments are all about Stimulation of old body, but never reversal of ageing.
As I so often say, in science-- getting data is dime a dozen and takes dime a dozen marbles of brains. But once science researchers start making Interpretations of their data-- well there is a old saying -- separate the men from the boys. Often, not always, but often it is the case that scientists never have the correct logical wits to interpret correctly their science.
AP