Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

factorization in noetherian domains

11 views
Skip to first unread message

quasi

unread,
Oct 30, 2005, 3:36:34 AM10/30/05
to
Let R be an integral domain.

An element x in R will be called irreducible if

(1) x is not zero and not a unit

(2) x=ab implies a or b is a unit

Equivalently, x is irreducible if (x) is a maximal element of the set
of a nonzero proper ideals of R.

An element p in R is called prime if (p) is a nonzero prime ideal.
Clearly every prime is irreducible but the converse is not automatic.
In fact,

R is a unique factorization domain) (UFD) iff every irreducible is
prime.

Any noetherian domain which is not a field has at least one
irreducible element. In fact, for such a ring, every nonzero nonunit
element is either irreducible or else has at least 2 irreducible
factors (not necessarily distinct).

Question (1): In a noetherian domain, can a nonzero element have
infinitely many irreducible factors? In other words, can a nonzero
element be a member of infinitely many distinct maximally principal
ideals?

Question (2): If a noetherian domain is not a field, must there be at
least one element which is prime?

Next, we consider complete factorization without uniqueness.

Let R be an integral domain.

Call R a finite factorization domain (FFD) if every nonzero nonunit
element of R is either irreducible or a product of irreducibles.

FFD is a much weaker concept than UFD, since for example, the ring of
algebraic integers in a finite extension of Q is an FFD (I think), but
not necessarily a UFD.

There are various possible strengthenings of the concept of FFD.

For example:

FFD-1: The complete factorizations of a given element must have
bounded length (depending on the element).

FFD-2: The total number of distinct complete factorizations of a given
element must be finite:

But to start, let's stay with just FFD.

Let R be an FFD..

Question (3): Is every noetherian domain an FFD?

Disclaimer: I'm not very knowledgeable about this stuff -- I just know
the basics (up to perhaps the lower graduate level), so the new term
FFD which I coined above might already have some other standard name.
If so, please advise.

In any case, the questions I posed above were just some questions that
I had asked myself but couldn't answer, so I thought I'd share them.

quasi

mzafr...@usa.net

unread,
Oct 30, 2005, 4:02:35 AM10/30/05
to
Dear Quasi,
I am a bit tired. Have had a rough day with knowledeius and his crowd.
Here is a reference. There are more if you like but this will do for
now.
[1]. Anderson, Anderson, Zafrullah, Factorization in integral domains,
J. Pure Appl. Algebra 69(1990),1-19.

quasi wrote:
> Let R be an integral domain.
>
> An element x in R will be called irreducible if
>
> (1) x is not zero and not a unit
>
> (2) x=ab implies a or b is a unit
>
> Equivalently, x is irreducible if (x) is a maximal element of the set
> of a nonzero proper ideals of R.
proper principal ideals.
An irreducible element is also called an atom.

> An element p in R is called prime if (p) is a nonzero prime ideal.
> Clearly every prime is irreducible but the converse is not automatic.
> In fact,
>
> R is a unique factorization domain) (UFD) iff every irreducible is
> prime.

You need to add: And every nonzero nonunit of R is a (finite) product
of irreducible elements.
Here are some examples in which every irreducible element is a prime
but the domain is not a UFD.
1. A discrete rank 2 valuation domain (V,M) has up to associates only
one irreducible element and that is the generator of the maximal
ideal. Let p be the prime them M=pV. Since V is of rank 2 M properly
contains a nonzero prime ideal Q. Now for every nonzero x in Q we have
p^{n}|x for every n. But in a UFD every nonzero nonunit can be epressed
as a finite product of finite powers of primes.
2. The ring of all algebraic integers A is another example. Because A
has no irreducible elements, "Every irreducible element is a prime"
holds vacuously. What is interesting is that in each polynomial ring
A[X_1,X_2 ,...,X_n] "Every irreducible element is a prime" holds but
not vacuously.


>
> Any noetherian domain which is not a field has at least one
> irreducible element. In fact, for such a ring, every nonzero nonunit
> element is either irreducible or else has at least 2 irreducible
> factors (not necessarily distinct).

Noetherian -->ACC on ideals --->ACC on principal ideals --> exery
nonzero nonunit is expressible as a finite product of irreducible
elements.


>
> Question (1): In a noetherian domain, can a nonzero element have
> infinitely many irreducible factors? In other words, can a nonzero
> element be a member of infinitely many distinct maximally principal
> ideals?

Yes. The example that I have is a bit kinky. Let D = R+XC[X] where R is
the set of real numbers and C that of complex numbers. D is the set of
polynomials f(X) over C such that f(0) is a real number. It can be
shown that D is Noetherian but each member of {(r+i)X: r in R} is a
factor of X^{2} and each of (r+i)X can be shown to be irreducible. You
can look up [1] for the ref. on D being Noetherian.


>
> Question (2): If a noetherian domain is not a field, must there be at
> least one element which is prime?

No. Take a one dimensional local Noetherian domain R with maximal ideal
M. If R contains an irreducible element p that is a prime then pR is a
prime ideal and obviously pR is contained in M and M is of height one.
Forcing M=pR. So if you require a one dimensional local Noetherian
domain to have at least one principal prime then you are asking it to
be a UFD.


>
> Next, we consider complete factorization without uniqueness.

I hope by complete factorization you mean x = a_1 a_2 ...a_n where a_i
are all irreducible elements.


>
> Let R be an integral domain.
>
> Call R a finite factorization domain (FFD) if every nonzero nonunit
> element of R is either irreducible or a product of irreducibles.

We call such a domain an atomic domain.


>
> FFD is a much weaker concept than UFD, since for example, the ring of
> algebraic integers in a finite extension of Q is an FFD (I think), but
> not necessarily a UFD.

True.


>
> There are various possible strengthenings of the concept of FFD.
>
> For example:
>
> FFD-1: The complete factorizations of a given element must have
> bounded length (depending on the element).

If by this you mean for every nonzero x there is an n =n(x) such that
for each atomic factorization x = a_1 a_2 ...a_r we must have r<=n Such
a domain is called a BFD (Bounded Factorization Domain). A description
can be found in [1].


>
> FFD-2: The total number of distinct complete factorizations of a given
> element must be finite:

These are known as FFD's (Finite factorization domains) in [1]. If I
understaqnd you correctly.


>
> But to start, let's stay with just FFD.
>
> Let R be an FFD..
>
> Question (3): Is every noetherian domain an FFD?

Every Noetherian domain is atomic i.e. every nonzero nonunit is
expressible as a product of finitely many irreducible elements.


>
> Disclaimer: I'm not very knowledgeable about this stuff -- I just know
> the basics (up to perhaps the lower graduate level), so the new term
> FFD which I coined above might already have some other standard name.
> If so, please advise.

>
> In any case, the questions I posed above were just some questions that
> I had asked myself but couldn't answer, so I thought I'd share them.
>
> quasi

This is the best I could do under my current state. If there are any
questions feel free.
Muhammad

quasi

unread,
Oct 30, 2005, 3:45:51 PM10/30/05
to

Thank you, Muhammad.

I'm very low on time for the next week, so I won't have time to review
your reply carefully until next weekend.

But thanks again -- I appreciate the reply.

quasi

0 new messages