Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

What is 9.22337203685478E+18 as an integer?

4,069 views
Skip to first unread message

George Weer

unread,
Apr 24, 2002, 5:52:41 PM4/24/02
to
What is 9.22337203685478E+18 as an integer?

Please reply to group.

Thanks


David T. Ashley

unread,
Apr 24, 2002, 6:36:13 PM4/24/02
to
"George Weer" <RubberD...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:aa79f5$8hv5i$1...@ID-116287.news.dfncis.de...

> What is 9.22337203685478E+18 as an integer?

This is short for 9.22... * 10^18 = 9.22 million million million.

You just need to shift the decimal point to the right 18 places.

But be aware, you may be missing some digits at the end (loss of precision).

Dave.

Dann Corbit

unread,
Apr 24, 2002, 6:46:00 PM4/24/02
to
"George Weer" <RubberD...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:aa79f5$8hv5i$1...@ID-116287.news.dfncis.de...
> What is 9.22337203685478E+18 as an integer?


That is an integer. Why do you ask?
--
C-FAQ: http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html
"The C-FAQ Book" ISBN 0-201-84519-9
C.A.P. FAQ: ftp://cap.connx.com/pub/Chess%20Analysis%20Project%20FAQ.htm


Moufang Loop

unread,
Apr 24, 2002, 7:20:58 PM4/24/02
to


9223372036854780000

Stuart L. Anderson

unread,
Apr 25, 2002, 12:40:52 AM4/25/02
to
In sci.math George Weer <RubberD...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> What is 9.22337203685478E+18 as an integer?

It is approximately 2^63. In fact, if I evaluate 2**63 in Perl, I get
your number. Mathematically, 2^63 = 9223372036854775808.

--Stu
___________________________________________________________________
Stu Anderson stua...@drizzle.com Renton, Washington, USA

Michel OLAGNON

unread,
Apr 25, 2002, 2:54:49 AM4/25/02
to

In article <aa79f5$8hv5i$1...@ID-116287.news.dfncis.de>, "George Weer" <RubberD...@hotmail.com> writes:
>What is 9.22337203685478E+18 as an integer?
>
>Please reply to group.
>

Why should all these groups get spammed with the answer to your homework ?


Alan Morgan

unread,
Apr 25, 2002, 12:48:15 PM4/25/02
to
In article <1019709645.453071@yasure>,

Stuart L. Anderson <stua...@drizzle.com> wrote:
>In sci.math George Weer <RubberD...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> What is 9.22337203685478E+18 as an integer?
>
>It is approximately 2^63. In fact, if I evaluate 2**63 in Perl, I get
>your number. Mathematically, 2^63 = 9223372036854775808.

What is it non-mathematically?

Alan
--
Defendit numerus

Nick Maclaren

unread,
Apr 25, 2002, 1:20:49 PM4/25/02
to

Four characters, three of which are digits?


Regards,
Nick Maclaren,
University of Cambridge Computing Service,
New Museums Site, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QH, England.
Email: nm...@cam.ac.uk
Tel.: +44 1223 334761 Fax: +44 1223 334679

Moufang Loop

unread,
Apr 25, 2002, 1:24:30 PM4/25/02
to

If this is a homework question, the question setter should be shot.

ML

Gib Bogle

unread,
Apr 25, 2002, 4:37:40 PM4/25/02
to
Nick Maclaren wrote:
>
> In article <aa9c0f$4it$1...@usenet.Stanford.EDU>, amo...@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Alan Morgan) writes:
> |> In article <1019709645.453071@yasure>,
> |> Stuart L. Anderson <stua...@drizzle.com> wrote:
> |> >In sci.math George Weer <RubberD...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> |> >> What is 9.22337203685478E+18 as an integer?
> |> >
> |> >It is approximately 2^63. In fact, if I evaluate 2**63 in Perl, I get
> |> >your number. Mathematically, 2^63 = 9223372036854775808.
> |>
> |> What is it non-mathematically?
>
> Four characters, three of which are digits?

This could be the beginning of a very long thread. But I won't start it
...

Gib Bogle

unread,
Apr 25, 2002, 4:39:01 PM4/25/02
to

Maybe the question setter knows his questionees.

Harry J. Smith

unread,
Apr 25, 2002, 5:14:18 PM4/25/02
to
It probably comes from 2^63 - 1 = 9223372036854775807.
The largest integer that can be represented in the long_integer format with
one bit used for the sign and 63 bits used for value.

"Stuart L. Anderson" <stua...@drizzle.com> wrote in message
news:1019709645.453071@yasure...

Adam Russell

unread,
Apr 26, 2002, 12:58:09 AM4/26/02
to

"Alan Morgan" <amo...@Xenon.Stanford.EDU> wrote in message
news:aa9c0f$4it$1...@usenet.Stanford.EDU...

humungous


Paul Schlyter

unread,
Apr 26, 2002, 1:52:14 AM4/26/02
to
In article <aa9c0f$4it$1...@usenet.Stanford.EDU>,
Numerically it's 9.22337203685478E+18 (double precision)
or 9.223372E+18 (single precision)

:-)

--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Schlyter, Swedish Amateur Astronomer's Society (SAAF)
Grev Turegatan 40, S-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN
e-mail: pausch at saaf dot se
WWW: http://hem.passagen.se/pausch/index.html
http://home.tiscali.se/~pausch/

John Savard

unread,
Apr 29, 2002, 7:30:47 AM4/29/02
to
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 22:52:41 +0100, "George Weer"
<RubberD...@hotmail.com> wrote, in part:

>What is 9.22337203685478E+18 as an integer?

Don't you know that this is a notation for

9.22337203685478 * 10^18

and don't you also know that that would be

9,223,372,036,854,780,000

although others have noticed that as this number is very close to
2^63, that is probably the exact number you want, which is

9,223,372,036,854,775,808

But then I suppose you never took FORTRAN or BASIC programming.

John Savard
http://members.shaw.ca/quadibloc/index.html

The Technical Manager

unread,
Apr 29, 2002, 10:11:54 AM4/29/02
to
Paul Schlyter wrote:

> In article <aa9c0f$4it$1...@usenet.Stanford.EDU>,
> Alan Morgan <amo...@Xenon.Stanford.EDU> wrote:
> > In article <1019709645.453071@yasure>,
> > Stuart L. Anderson <stua...@drizzle.com> wrote:
> >>In sci.math George Weer <RubberD...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>> What is 9.22337203685478E+18 as an integer?
> >>
> >>It is approximately 2^63. In fact, if I evaluate 2**63 in Perl, I get
> >>your number. Mathematically, 2^63 = 9223372036854775808.
> >
> > What is it non-mathematically?
>
> Numerically it's 9.22337203685478E+18 (double precision)
> or 9.223372E+18 (single precision)

Is the scientific number notation system still part of the GCSE mathematics
course ? Originally it was on the intermediate level paper but later got
moved to the higher paper. I have a good feeling that most exam boards have
ditched it. Percentage errors have also been ditched in recent times and so
have indices.

DIAMOND Mark R.

unread,
May 1, 2002, 1:27:35 AM5/1/02
to
One of the amusing things about the E notation is that the statistical
package SPSS uses it several places in the printout. Students have often
report their results in assignments in this notation, having copied the
result of a calculation directly from the SPSS output. But on questioning
them, they have no idea of the meaning of what they have written!

A dataIn->computer->dataOut->student/faculty/human->garbageOut problem.

--
Mark R. Diamond

Jerry W. Lewis

unread,
May 1, 2002, 8:07:46 PM5/1/02
to
If the number is accurate to 19 figures (highly unlikely unless you are
using Maple or Mathematica) then as an integer it is

9,223,372,036,854,780,000

More likely trailing zeroes are beyond the accuracy of your package, and
therefore not real.

Jerry

àV

unread,
Jul 12, 2002, 6:05:12 AM7/12/02
to
9223372036854780000

George Weer <RubberD...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:aa79f5$8hv5i$1...@ID-116287.news.dfncis.de...

Harry J. Smith

unread,
Jul 12, 2002, 12:40:30 PM7/12/02
to

" àV" <dha...@no.spam.co.uk> wrote in message
news:agm94g$br8$1...@south.jnrs.ja.net...

You may be referring to the largest integer that can be
represented as a 64-bit signed integer = 2^63 - 1 =
9223372036854775807.

-Harry


Adhvay Naidu

unread,
Mar 14, 2023, 5:11:27 PM3/14/23
to
Nah 💯

Adhvay Naidu

unread,
Mar 14, 2023, 5:26:54 PM3/14/23
to
Hi

V

unread,
Mar 17, 2023, 10:11:07 AM3/17/23
to
Let's get to know each other. Me: http://kohtumispaik.000webhostapp.com/Infovahetusteks/dpic/1679061026.gif

Have a nice day......
0 new messages