Please reply to group.
Thanks
This is short for 9.22... * 10^18 = 9.22 million million million.
You just need to shift the decimal point to the right 18 places.
But be aware, you may be missing some digits at the end (loss of precision).
Dave.
That is an integer. Why do you ask?
--
C-FAQ: http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html
"The C-FAQ Book" ISBN 0-201-84519-9
C.A.P. FAQ: ftp://cap.connx.com/pub/Chess%20Analysis%20Project%20FAQ.htm
9223372036854780000
It is approximately 2^63. In fact, if I evaluate 2**63 in Perl, I get
your number. Mathematically, 2^63 = 9223372036854775808.
--Stu
___________________________________________________________________
Stu Anderson stua...@drizzle.com Renton, Washington, USA
In article <aa79f5$8hv5i$1...@ID-116287.news.dfncis.de>, "George Weer" <RubberD...@hotmail.com> writes:
>What is 9.22337203685478E+18 as an integer?
>
>Please reply to group.
>
Why should all these groups get spammed with the answer to your homework ?
What is it non-mathematically?
Alan
--
Defendit numerus
Four characters, three of which are digits?
Regards,
Nick Maclaren,
University of Cambridge Computing Service,
New Museums Site, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QH, England.
Email: nm...@cam.ac.uk
Tel.: +44 1223 334761 Fax: +44 1223 334679
If this is a homework question, the question setter should be shot.
ML
This could be the beginning of a very long thread. But I won't start it
...
Maybe the question setter knows his questionees.
"Stuart L. Anderson" <stua...@drizzle.com> wrote in message
news:1019709645.453071@yasure...
humungous
>What is 9.22337203685478E+18 as an integer?
Don't you know that this is a notation for
9.22337203685478 * 10^18
and don't you also know that that would be
9,223,372,036,854,780,000
although others have noticed that as this number is very close to
2^63, that is probably the exact number you want, which is
9,223,372,036,854,775,808
But then I suppose you never took FORTRAN or BASIC programming.
John Savard
http://members.shaw.ca/quadibloc/index.html
> In article <aa9c0f$4it$1...@usenet.Stanford.EDU>,
> Alan Morgan <amo...@Xenon.Stanford.EDU> wrote:
> > In article <1019709645.453071@yasure>,
> > Stuart L. Anderson <stua...@drizzle.com> wrote:
> >>In sci.math George Weer <RubberD...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>> What is 9.22337203685478E+18 as an integer?
> >>
> >>It is approximately 2^63. In fact, if I evaluate 2**63 in Perl, I get
> >>your number. Mathematically, 2^63 = 9223372036854775808.
> >
> > What is it non-mathematically?
>
> Numerically it's 9.22337203685478E+18 (double precision)
> or 9.223372E+18 (single precision)
Is the scientific number notation system still part of the GCSE mathematics
course ? Originally it was on the intermediate level paper but later got
moved to the higher paper. I have a good feeling that most exam boards have
ditched it. Percentage errors have also been ditched in recent times and so
have indices.
A dataIn->computer->dataOut->student/faculty/human->garbageOut problem.
--
Mark R. Diamond
9,223,372,036,854,780,000
More likely trailing zeroes are beyond the accuracy of your package, and
therefore not real.
Jerry
George Weer <RubberD...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:aa79f5$8hv5i$1...@ID-116287.news.dfncis.de...
You may be referring to the largest integer that can be
represented as a 64-bit signed integer = 2^63 - 1 =
9223372036854775807.
-Harry