Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

L'Hopital and Multivariable Calculus

250 views
Skip to first unread message

Mike Stump

unread,
Nov 11, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/11/98
to
Hi.... Just a quick question that cropped up in my MAT 2500 (Multivariable
Calc) class today.. As we probably all know, L'Hopital's rule states that
when we're taking the limit of a quotient which yields an indeterminate form
when we substitute the value in, such as

lim(as x->0) of (x/x^2) *which yields 0/0*,

we can take the derivative of the numerator and the derivative of the
denominator, and take the limit then. *To use the above ex.,

lim(as x->0) of (x/x^2) = lim(as x->0) of (1/2x) = 1/(2*0) = 1/0 = infinity


Well, we were discussing functions of three independent variables x, y and z
today, and the question arose- If we were to take the

lim(as (x,y,z)->(a,b,c)) of (f(x,y,z))

and when we substitute to get f(a,b,c) we get an indeterminate value (such
as 0/0 or infinity/infinity),

is there another form of L'Hopital's Theorem which covers multivariable
cases? I'm sure that if it exists it'd be quite laborious and involve
partial deriv's up the gazoo, but it could come in handy.

If any of you can help, please email me at mstu...@student.villanova.edu,
and myself and my professor will be extremely grateful. Thanks a bunch!

---Michael Stump
2nd Yr. Astrophysics Major, Villanova U. (Villanova, PA)


William C Waterhouse

unread,
Nov 11, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/11/98
to
In article <72cotr$r...@ftp.ee.vill.edu>, "
Mike Stump" <mstu...@student.vill.edu> writes:
>...
> Well, we were discussing functions of three independent variables x, y and z
> today, and the question arose- If we were to take the
>
> lim(as (x,y,z)->(a,b,c)) of (f(x,y,z))
>
> and when we substitute to get f(a,b,c) we get an indeterminate value (such
> as 0/0 or infinity/infinity),
>
> is there another form of L'Hopital's Theorem which covers multivariable
> cases?
>...

The fact is that such expressions almost never have limits, first
because they aren't defined in the full neighborhood of the point
and second because they won't have a limit even where they are
defined.

Both problems are visible in the simplest case in two variables,
[ax + by]/[cx + dy]
near the origin. First, cx+dy = 0 gives a whole line through the
origin where the ratio isn't defined. Secondly, dividing numerator
and denominator by x, we see that this ratio is equal to
[a + b(y/x)]/[c + d(y/x)].
Thus if you approach the origin along lines of different slopes,
you get different limiting values.


William C. Waterhouse
Penn State

bo...@rsa.com

unread,
Nov 16, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/16/98
to
In article <72cv6a$15...@r02n01.cac.psu.edu>,

Yup.

Allow me to state this somewhat differently.

In multiple dimensions the value of a function at a limit point usually
depends on the PATH you take in approaching the limit point. Approach
along one path and you get one answer. Approach along another and
you get another answer. In the univariate case (1 dimension) this problem
does not arise because there is only one path to take to approach the limit.

The concept of "analytic function" in the complex plane arises precisely
because of this difficulty.

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

Jeff Bertolet

unread,
Nov 16, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/16/98
to
The Path that one takes to the origon is indeed important. To evaluate multivatiable
limits you can make substitutions to simplify.

lim (x,y)--> (0,0) (2x^2*y)/(x^4 + y^2)
make the subst. y=mx, which means you approach along some straight line.
lim x--> 0 2mx^3/(x^4 + m^2x^2)= lim x--> 0 2mx/(x^2+m^2)=0
BUT,
make subs. y=x^2, meaning you approach along parabola.
lim x--> 0 2x^4/(x^4+x^4)=1


DWCantrell

unread,
Nov 17, 1998, 3:00:00 AM11/17/98
to

In article <72pd45$f02$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>, bo...@rsa.com writes:

>In multiple dimensions the value of a function at a limit point usually
>depends on the PATH you take in approaching the limit point.

Replace "usually" with "generally" and I would then agree.

>Approach
>along one path and you get one answer. Approach along another and
>you get another answer. In the univariate case (1 dimension) this problem
>does not arise because there is only one path to take to approach the limit.

False. In one dimension, there are normally two paths; they can be called
"approach from the left" and "approach from the right". Of course, limits from
left and right need not agree.

Cheers,
David Cantrell

0 new messages