9 views

Skip to first unread message

Message has been deleted

Sep 20, 2023, 11:54:13 PMSep 20

to

☠️ of Math and ☠ of Physics Archimedes "antiscience" Plutonium

<plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

> My 134th published book

>

> Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition

> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

>

> Why do you still keep trying to brainwash little 5 year old kids?

WARNING TO STUDENTS, PARENTS and TEACHERS: Archimedes Plutonium is

offering to teach your children his broken physics and math. BEWARE! He

will corrupt the minds of your children! Mr. Plutonium is not content to

be a failure of math and physics all by himself. He wants everyone else

to fail as well! He teaches bizarre false physics and math, such as

atoms contain the unstable muon, water is H4O and not H2O, the ellipse

isn't a conic section, there are no negative numbers and no complex

numbers, that a sine wave isn't sinusoidal but semicircles, cycloids or

parabolas (depending on his mood), plus many, many other instances of

bad math and physics.

Plutonium has previously tried to corrupt our youth by posting his books

on Usenet. That has failed until now, perhaps in part due to the fact

Usenet is an old, dying medium, which few modern students even know of,

much less use. However, Mr. Plutonium has somehow duped Amazon into

providing his dangerous books for free on Kindle. This has greatly

increased the danger to our students!

One of his dangerous tricks is teach false Boolean logic such as 10 AND

2 = 12. His method at doing this is particularly insidious. He'll post a

false statement that nobody believes, such as 10 OR 2 = 12, say that it

is false (which it is), but then he'll try to replace it with another

similar false statement such as 10 AND 2 = 12, in order to really

confuse future computer scientists. Plutonium is taking advantage of the

fact that AND means different things in Boolean logic and elementary

arithmetic, as AND is an informal synonym for plus/addition. It is

important for future computer scientists to remember that in the bitwise

Boolean logic used by modern computers, 10 OR 2 = 10 and 10 AND 2 = 2.

Of course in pure Boolean logic the only possible values are true and

false (1 or 0), so in pure Boolean logic the statements "10 AND 2" and

"10 OR 2" don't even make sense. Don't let evil Plutonium's bad logic

confuse you!

Plutonium has been targeting children as young as 5. A new attempt to

corrupt the minds of young children is to teach that the alphabet has 12

letters, 6 vowels and 6 consonants. This sounds like a great way to

keep our children from reading!

Nobody knows why Plutonium wishes to corrupt the minds of our youth like

this. Perhaps Plutonium is envious of their potential success, which he

never had because he is a failure at math and science. Plutonium is not

content to be a failure at math and physics all by himself. He wants

everyone to fail as well. Some claim Plutonium is an agent of China, in

order for China to dominate the world economy. Maybe he is a minion of

Kim Jong Un of North Korea. Most likely, however, he is an agent of

Putin and Russia, since Plutonium has previously attempted to summon

Russian robots in 2017 "to create a new, true mathematics" in an attempt

to destroy mathematics.

Additionally, Plutonium has started a Cult of Failure. He is trying to

convince students to worship his evil pagan Plutonium atom god of

Failure. This cult is anti-science and anti-mathematics. Its only goal

is to promote failure in math and science.

There is some evidence this Cult of Failure may be a suicide cult.

Plutonium has advocated that the "good guy" nations join into a

supernation and threaten to "flatten" the (nuclear armed) "bad guy"

nations who misbehave. The idea may to initiate an all-out nuclear

war when "bad guy" nations retaliate. Not simply is Plutonium or his

cult committing suicide but would take Planet Earth with them. As the

war in Ukraine continues, Plutonium keeps asking NATO to attack the

Russians, starting a nuclear WW3, which he feels is unavoidable. More

evidence of Plutonium's Cult of Failure being a suicide cult.

Plutonium is now encouraging resistance fighters fighting the regimes

in Russia and Iran to attack power lines in Tehran and Moscow by

carrying long vertical aluminum poles under them, presumably to short

them out, complete with a diagram. Obviously, this will not end well

for for the resistance fighter. The question is, did he do this because

he is Putin's stooge trying to kill off resistance fighters? Or is this

part of Plutonium's Suicide Cult of Failure, meaning this is merely a

suggestion how to commit suicide while failing to harm the regimes? Or

both?

But the point is, stay away, if he offers to give or sell you one of his

dangerous books. Especially now since they are available for free from

otherwise legitimate Amazon.

<plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

> My 134th published book

>

> Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition

> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

>

> Why do you still keep trying to brainwash little 5 year old kids?

WARNING TO STUDENTS, PARENTS and TEACHERS: Archimedes Plutonium is

offering to teach your children his broken physics and math. BEWARE! He

will corrupt the minds of your children! Mr. Plutonium is not content to

be a failure of math and physics all by himself. He wants everyone else

to fail as well! He teaches bizarre false physics and math, such as

atoms contain the unstable muon, water is H4O and not H2O, the ellipse

isn't a conic section, there are no negative numbers and no complex

numbers, that a sine wave isn't sinusoidal but semicircles, cycloids or

parabolas (depending on his mood), plus many, many other instances of

bad math and physics.

Plutonium has previously tried to corrupt our youth by posting his books

on Usenet. That has failed until now, perhaps in part due to the fact

Usenet is an old, dying medium, which few modern students even know of,

much less use. However, Mr. Plutonium has somehow duped Amazon into

providing his dangerous books for free on Kindle. This has greatly

increased the danger to our students!

One of his dangerous tricks is teach false Boolean logic such as 10 AND

2 = 12. His method at doing this is particularly insidious. He'll post a

false statement that nobody believes, such as 10 OR 2 = 12, say that it

is false (which it is), but then he'll try to replace it with another

similar false statement such as 10 AND 2 = 12, in order to really

confuse future computer scientists. Plutonium is taking advantage of the

fact that AND means different things in Boolean logic and elementary

arithmetic, as AND is an informal synonym for plus/addition. It is

important for future computer scientists to remember that in the bitwise

Boolean logic used by modern computers, 10 OR 2 = 10 and 10 AND 2 = 2.

Of course in pure Boolean logic the only possible values are true and

false (1 or 0), so in pure Boolean logic the statements "10 AND 2" and

"10 OR 2" don't even make sense. Don't let evil Plutonium's bad logic

confuse you!

Plutonium has been targeting children as young as 5. A new attempt to

corrupt the minds of young children is to teach that the alphabet has 12

letters, 6 vowels and 6 consonants. This sounds like a great way to

keep our children from reading!

Nobody knows why Plutonium wishes to corrupt the minds of our youth like

this. Perhaps Plutonium is envious of their potential success, which he

never had because he is a failure at math and science. Plutonium is not

content to be a failure at math and physics all by himself. He wants

everyone to fail as well. Some claim Plutonium is an agent of China, in

order for China to dominate the world economy. Maybe he is a minion of

Kim Jong Un of North Korea. Most likely, however, he is an agent of

Putin and Russia, since Plutonium has previously attempted to summon

Russian robots in 2017 "to create a new, true mathematics" in an attempt

to destroy mathematics.

Additionally, Plutonium has started a Cult of Failure. He is trying to

convince students to worship his evil pagan Plutonium atom god of

Failure. This cult is anti-science and anti-mathematics. Its only goal

is to promote failure in math and science.

There is some evidence this Cult of Failure may be a suicide cult.

Plutonium has advocated that the "good guy" nations join into a

supernation and threaten to "flatten" the (nuclear armed) "bad guy"

nations who misbehave. The idea may to initiate an all-out nuclear

war when "bad guy" nations retaliate. Not simply is Plutonium or his

cult committing suicide but would take Planet Earth with them. As the

war in Ukraine continues, Plutonium keeps asking NATO to attack the

Russians, starting a nuclear WW3, which he feels is unavoidable. More

evidence of Plutonium's Cult of Failure being a suicide cult.

Plutonium is now encouraging resistance fighters fighting the regimes

in Russia and Iran to attack power lines in Tehran and Moscow by

carrying long vertical aluminum poles under them, presumably to short

them out, complete with a diagram. Obviously, this will not end well

for for the resistance fighter. The question is, did he do this because

he is Putin's stooge trying to kill off resistance fighters? Or is this

part of Plutonium's Suicide Cult of Failure, meaning this is merely a

suggestion how to commit suicide while failing to harm the regimes? Or

both?

But the point is, stay away, if he offers to give or sell you one of his

dangerous books. Especially now since they are available for free from

otherwise legitimate Amazon.

Message has been deleted

Sep 21, 2023, 12:27:24 AMSep 21

to

🐁 of Math and Giant Rabid Sewer 🐀 of Physics Archimedes "failure"

Sep 21, 2023, 4:01:21 AMSep 21

to

Dr.Cordova, Kibo defiling The Pope

> ☠️ of Math and ☠ of Physics "antiscience"

On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 10:54:13 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote: --- kibo Parry Moroney-Volney has defiled & demonized AP for 30years nonstop hate bullying, can someone stop the insane Kibo from defiling The Pope??

Re: Kibo on Purdue's France Cordova,Dayton Uni Eric Spina. Can they stop Kibo from defiling The Pope for Kibo has been 30 year nonstop demonizer and defiler of AP. Kibo says > Blowfly of Math and Botfly of Physics > "Kim Jong Un's lackey"

by V õ l u r 8:03, 2May2023

Re: _John J.Veysey,Purdue's France Cordova,NSF Dr. Panchanathan, why does Kibo defile The Pope with his hate stalking? 30 year stalker Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 8:37:00 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote: > "antiscience" >"Pope Arky t

by V õ l u r 12:33 PM June 19, 2023

Dr.Cordova, The Pope defiled by Kibo

> Gnat of Math and Phlea of Physics"always wrong" "Psycho"

On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 1:31:19 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:-- Kibo Parry Moroney Volney a bully attack dog defiler and demonizer for nonstop 30 years. Dr. Veysey and Dr. Cordova, please help put Kibo in prison or asylum where he belongs.

Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> > > > by Volney Feb 24, 2023, 11:28:40 PM

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 9:28:07 PM UTC-6, Volney wrote:

> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> > > > > "self diagnosed as insane"

> > > >

> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> > > > by Volney Mar 31, 2023, 1:45:31 AM

> > > >

Volney posts imply---

NSF Dr.Panchanathan loves TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, for in one class lesson of High School the bulk of Calculus can be taught, by polynomials add or subtract 1 to exponent.

Dr.Panchanathan cannot understand the reluctance of Catholic schools like Purdue Uni and Uni of Dayton in accepting TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS-- maybe they like torture chambers of Old Math with their thousands of different functions and their thousands of rules for each.

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, AP seeks the super easiest calculus possible on Earth-- polynomials as the only valid functions-- thus, and therefore, making derivative and integral as easy as Power Rule- 14 year olds master calculus

Old Math makes and keeps Calculus as classroom torture chambers with their 1,000s of different functions yet the polynomial is the only valid function of math, and makes it super super easy to learn calculus.

If you come to me with a pathetic non polynomial, I have you go home and convert your nonsense to a polynomial. The Lagrange interpolation converts stupid nonfunctions like trig, into valid functions of polynomials.

the 30 year nonstop stalker Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney

On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 5:37:32 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

>"goonclod failure of logic"

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS textbooks, makes calculus as easy as adding or subtracting 1 from exponent--only valid functions are polynomials contrast with mainstream--vomiting during exams, torture chamber and nervous breakdown by sado-masochist teachers. Old Math is thousands of different kook functions with thousands of different rules. AP Calculus is one function-- the polynomial for we care about truth in math, not on whether kooks of math become rich and famous off the suffering-backs of students put through a torture chamber that is present day calculus. If you come to math with a function that is not a polynomial, you have to convert it to a polynomial. Once converted, calculus is super super easy. But math professors seem to enjoy torturing students, not teaching them. Psychology teaches us that when a kook goes through a torture chamber and comes out of it as a math professor-- they want to be vindictive and sado masochists and love to torture others and put them through the same torture chamber that they went through. AP says-- stop this cycle of torture and teach TRUE CORRECT MATH.

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, AP seeks the super easiest calculus possible on Earth-- polynomials as the only valid functions-- thus, and therefore, making derivative and integral as easy as Power Rule- 14 year olds master calculus

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS textbooks, makes calculus as easy as adding or subtracting 1 from exponent--only valid functions are polynomials contrast with mainstream--vomiting during exams, torture chamber and nervous breakdown by sado-masochist teachers. Old Math is thousands of different kook functions with thousands of different rules. AP Calculus is one function-- the polynomial for we care about truth in math, not on whether kooks of math become rich and famous off the suffering of students put through a torture chamber that is present day calculus. If you come to math with a function that is not a polynomial, you have to convert it to a polynomial. Once converted, calculus is super super easy. But math professors seem to enjoy torturing students, not teaching them.

Old Math calculus textbooks like Stewart are more than 1,000 pages long and they need that because they have a mindless thousand different functions and no valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. AP's calculus is less than 300 pages, because we have a valid geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus which demands the only valid function of math be a polynomial function. We can teach calculus in Junior High School for the calculus is reduced to adding or subtracting 1 from the exponent. The only hard part of calculus in New Math is to convert the boneheaded function into a polynomial that was brought to the table by the boneheaded math professor who thinks that a function does not need to be a polynomial.

AP calculus transforms the calculus classroom. It is no longer vomiting during exams. No longer a torture chamber for our students of youth, and no longer a nightmare nor nervous breakdown for our youthful students, who, all they ever wanted was the truth of mathematics.

Teaches that derivative predicts next point of function graph--silly Old Math has derivative as tangent to function graph unable to predict. The great power of Calculus is integral is area under function graph thus physics energy, and its prediction power of the derivative to predict the next future point of function graph thus making the derivative a "law of physics as predictor". Stupid Old Math makes the derivative a tangent line, while New Math makes the derivative the predictor of next point of function graph. No wonder no-one in Old Math could do a geometry, let alone a valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for no-one in Old Math even had the mind to realize Calculus predicts the future point in the derivative.

AP has managed to make sci.math a battlefield where AP is alone on one side and every other poster is either a direct attack on AP or an indirect attack on AP such as Markus, Gabriel, Thomasson, WM trying to push AP off the front page. While over in sci.physics, the maintenance team at sci.physics still have control of the helm. But sci.math is without a helmsman and rudderless. Quite a spectacle, and time for a change of personnel ISP of sci.math to be at least like sci.physics. I do not know how much of this if any, is the fault of NSF Dr.Panchanathan, Kibo Parry Moron-ey-Volney, Tim Skirvin, Gilbert Strang...

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS-- only math textbooks with a valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus--teaches that derivative predicts next point of function graph--silly Old Math has derivative as tangent to function graph unable to predict. This is why calculus is so important for physics, like a law of physics-- predicts the future given nearby point, predicts the next point. And of course the integral tells us the energy. Silly stupid Old Math understood the integral as area under the function graph curve, but were stupid silly as to the understanding of derivative-- predict the next point as seen in this illustration:

From this rectangle of the integral with points A, midpoint then B

______

| |

| |

| |

---------

To this trapezoid with points A, m, B

B

/|

/ |

m /----|

/ |

| |

|____|

The trapezoid roof has to be a straight-line segment (the derivative)

so that it can be hinged at m, and swiveled down to form rectangle for

integral.

Or going in reverse. From rectangle, the right triangle predicts the next successor point of function graph curve of B, from that of midpoint m and initial point of function graph A.

My 134th published book

Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

My 68th published book with the same green cone on cover.

Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Let me run a scenario for you, please.

There are 7-8 billion people on Earth today.

In the past 50 years we can roughly say that 50 million people studied Calculus in school or at home.

50 million people tried and attempted to learn calculus math.

I certainly was one amoung that 50 million.

And was AP the only one in 50 million to recognize that if you take polynomials as being the Only Valid Function that the Calculus becomes the Easiest, Super Easy math, because the Power Rules apply and where the derivative is simply a subtract 1 from exponent and the integral is add 1 to exponent.

I find it extremely sad and hard to believe that only AP saw how to make Calculus Super super super easy? Surely there must have been at least 25 million of those 50 million who found the derivative and integral of polynomials a joy and pleasure to do. Surely AP was not the only person in 50 million to see the Polynomial Calculus was a pleasure, fun and even exciting, rush to class to do a derivative or integral of a polynomial-- teacher, please give me more polynomial exercises. They are better than Star Trek on TV.

This is the whole point of a Revolution in Math Calculus.

When we make the only valid function in all of math be a Polynomial, we reduce calculus to adding 1 or subtracting 1.

We do not allow creeps, goons and kooks to clutter the table of math and calculus with their horrible awful smelly functions which are not polynomials. No, we disband these kooks and tell them go home and convert your worthless crap to be a polynomial before you can stink up the halls of mathematics. Convert your kook nonsense to a polynomial then you can come and do mathematics with us.

AP, King of Science

As a case in point, a mere example.

We have at MIT a Dr. Gilbert Strang with his Calculus textbooks, and I bought the 1991 edition of Calculus. And my opinion of Strang's text is scatterbrained. For I often find that Gilbert in lecturing on a topic is too quick to bring in side show issues, never focusing on just one topic.

But worst of this Strang text is he has no valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus FTC, no geometry proof and his Limit analysis of FTC is idiot of a proof-- ie-- no proof at all, for we all analyze things in the course of a day, and none of us are so preposterous as to think we have proven something above and beyond analyzing that something.

And so, I, AP reflects back to the time of 1968, when my name was Ludwig Hansen, sitting in a geology classroom of University of Cincinnati. Learning geology from a textbook that never discusses Continental Drift and this is 1968, mind you and Wegener had given massive evidence of Continental Drift way back to 1915, some 53 years later, AP and the classroom suffering from Truth of Science by having to buy a book about static-Earth, being tested graded lectured upon fake geology.

Not much difference from students sitting in classrooms at MIT or elsewhere buying Strang's CALCULUS with no valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, and where any fool function is allowed to enter, thousands and thousands of fool functions, when Mathematics has only one Valid Function-- the Polynomial function. For you can only arrive at a True Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus by using polynomials as functions.

So how many students every year are punished by having to learn calculus with fool functions, with no valid proof of FTC. Where the calculus classroom puts students not through a Pleasure learning session but a gauntlet torture chamber, whipping the students into nervous breakdowns and vomiting during exams.

All for what??? How much money does Dr. Strang make from his awful book Calculus?? Let me guess estimate.

The book probably costs $100 in our inflation environment. And typically a author gets 1/2 of that in royalties.

Say MIT teaches a class of 100 students in calculus per year would be 50 x 100 = $5,000. And say a estimate that around the world there are 100 schools teaching from this book of 100 students in their classroom would make Gilbert $500,000 per year in book sales of his Calculus.

Same can be said of AP back in 1968 having to learn fake geology with no Continental Drift plate tectonics, so that some so called scientists reaps a reward of 1/2 a million dollars in book sales. And that thousands of students taught lectured and tested upon fake geology.

This is one of the grand benefits of a Usenet and a Internet, that we speed up the process of throwing out Fake -Math, fake-geology and all other fake sciences. Freedom of Speech of Internet of Usenet allows for science to be Showered, Cleaned UP, bathed from its wretched stink of Old fake science. Clean Up their science.

The only valid functions in mathematics are Polynomial Functions, which in turn, makes Calculus be super super super easy. No more vomiting by students in a calculus exam. No more nervous breakdowns by students taking calculus.

AP

> ☠️ of Math and ☠ of Physics "antiscience"

On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 10:54:13 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote: --- kibo Parry Moroney-Volney has defiled & demonized AP for 30years nonstop hate bullying, can someone stop the insane Kibo from defiling The Pope??

Re: Kibo on Purdue's France Cordova,Dayton Uni Eric Spina. Can they stop Kibo from defiling The Pope for Kibo has been 30 year nonstop demonizer and defiler of AP. Kibo says > Blowfly of Math and Botfly of Physics > "Kim Jong Un's lackey"

by V õ l u r 8:03, 2May2023

Re: _John J.Veysey,Purdue's France Cordova,NSF Dr. Panchanathan, why does Kibo defile The Pope with his hate stalking? 30 year stalker Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 8:37:00 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote: > "antiscience" >"Pope Arky t

by V õ l u r 12:33 PM June 19, 2023

Dr.Cordova, The Pope defiled by Kibo

> Gnat of Math and Phlea of Physics"always wrong" "Psycho"

On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 1:31:19 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:-- Kibo Parry Moroney Volney a bully attack dog defiler and demonizer for nonstop 30 years. Dr. Veysey and Dr. Cordova, please help put Kibo in prison or asylum where he belongs.

Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> > > > by Volney Feb 24, 2023, 11:28:40 PM

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 9:28:07 PM UTC-6, Volney wrote:

> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> > > > > "self diagnosed as insane"

> > > >

> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> > > > by Volney Mar 31, 2023, 1:45:31 AM

> > > >

Volney posts imply---

NSF Dr.Panchanathan loves TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, for in one class lesson of High School the bulk of Calculus can be taught, by polynomials add or subtract 1 to exponent.

Dr.Panchanathan cannot understand the reluctance of Catholic schools like Purdue Uni and Uni of Dayton in accepting TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS-- maybe they like torture chambers of Old Math with their thousands of different functions and their thousands of rules for each.

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, AP seeks the super easiest calculus possible on Earth-- polynomials as the only valid functions-- thus, and therefore, making derivative and integral as easy as Power Rule- 14 year olds master calculus

Old Math makes and keeps Calculus as classroom torture chambers with their 1,000s of different functions yet the polynomial is the only valid function of math, and makes it super super easy to learn calculus.

If you come to me with a pathetic non polynomial, I have you go home and convert your nonsense to a polynomial. The Lagrange interpolation converts stupid nonfunctions like trig, into valid functions of polynomials.

the 30 year nonstop stalker Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney

On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 5:37:32 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

>"goonclod failure of logic"

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS textbooks, makes calculus as easy as adding or subtracting 1 from exponent--only valid functions are polynomials contrast with mainstream--vomiting during exams, torture chamber and nervous breakdown by sado-masochist teachers. Old Math is thousands of different kook functions with thousands of different rules. AP Calculus is one function-- the polynomial for we care about truth in math, not on whether kooks of math become rich and famous off the suffering-backs of students put through a torture chamber that is present day calculus. If you come to math with a function that is not a polynomial, you have to convert it to a polynomial. Once converted, calculus is super super easy. But math professors seem to enjoy torturing students, not teaching them. Psychology teaches us that when a kook goes through a torture chamber and comes out of it as a math professor-- they want to be vindictive and sado masochists and love to torture others and put them through the same torture chamber that they went through. AP says-- stop this cycle of torture and teach TRUE CORRECT MATH.

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, AP seeks the super easiest calculus possible on Earth-- polynomials as the only valid functions-- thus, and therefore, making derivative and integral as easy as Power Rule- 14 year olds master calculus

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS textbooks, makes calculus as easy as adding or subtracting 1 from exponent--only valid functions are polynomials contrast with mainstream--vomiting during exams, torture chamber and nervous breakdown by sado-masochist teachers. Old Math is thousands of different kook functions with thousands of different rules. AP Calculus is one function-- the polynomial for we care about truth in math, not on whether kooks of math become rich and famous off the suffering of students put through a torture chamber that is present day calculus. If you come to math with a function that is not a polynomial, you have to convert it to a polynomial. Once converted, calculus is super super easy. But math professors seem to enjoy torturing students, not teaching them.

Old Math calculus textbooks like Stewart are more than 1,000 pages long and they need that because they have a mindless thousand different functions and no valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. AP's calculus is less than 300 pages, because we have a valid geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus which demands the only valid function of math be a polynomial function. We can teach calculus in Junior High School for the calculus is reduced to adding or subtracting 1 from the exponent. The only hard part of calculus in New Math is to convert the boneheaded function into a polynomial that was brought to the table by the boneheaded math professor who thinks that a function does not need to be a polynomial.

AP calculus transforms the calculus classroom. It is no longer vomiting during exams. No longer a torture chamber for our students of youth, and no longer a nightmare nor nervous breakdown for our youthful students, who, all they ever wanted was the truth of mathematics.

Teaches that derivative predicts next point of function graph--silly Old Math has derivative as tangent to function graph unable to predict. The great power of Calculus is integral is area under function graph thus physics energy, and its prediction power of the derivative to predict the next future point of function graph thus making the derivative a "law of physics as predictor". Stupid Old Math makes the derivative a tangent line, while New Math makes the derivative the predictor of next point of function graph. No wonder no-one in Old Math could do a geometry, let alone a valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for no-one in Old Math even had the mind to realize Calculus predicts the future point in the derivative.

AP has managed to make sci.math a battlefield where AP is alone on one side and every other poster is either a direct attack on AP or an indirect attack on AP such as Markus, Gabriel, Thomasson, WM trying to push AP off the front page. While over in sci.physics, the maintenance team at sci.physics still have control of the helm. But sci.math is without a helmsman and rudderless. Quite a spectacle, and time for a change of personnel ISP of sci.math to be at least like sci.physics. I do not know how much of this if any, is the fault of NSF Dr.Panchanathan, Kibo Parry Moron-ey-Volney, Tim Skirvin, Gilbert Strang...

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS-- only math textbooks with a valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus--teaches that derivative predicts next point of function graph--silly Old Math has derivative as tangent to function graph unable to predict. This is why calculus is so important for physics, like a law of physics-- predicts the future given nearby point, predicts the next point. And of course the integral tells us the energy. Silly stupid Old Math understood the integral as area under the function graph curve, but were stupid silly as to the understanding of derivative-- predict the next point as seen in this illustration:

From this rectangle of the integral with points A, midpoint then B

______

| |

| |

| |

---------

To this trapezoid with points A, m, B

B

/|

/ |

m /----|

/ |

| |

|____|

The trapezoid roof has to be a straight-line segment (the derivative)

so that it can be hinged at m, and swiveled down to form rectangle for

integral.

Or going in reverse. From rectangle, the right triangle predicts the next successor point of function graph curve of B, from that of midpoint m and initial point of function graph A.

My 134th published book

Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

My 68th published book with the same green cone on cover.

Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Let me run a scenario for you, please.

There are 7-8 billion people on Earth today.

In the past 50 years we can roughly say that 50 million people studied Calculus in school or at home.

50 million people tried and attempted to learn calculus math.

I certainly was one amoung that 50 million.

And was AP the only one in 50 million to recognize that if you take polynomials as being the Only Valid Function that the Calculus becomes the Easiest, Super Easy math, because the Power Rules apply and where the derivative is simply a subtract 1 from exponent and the integral is add 1 to exponent.

I find it extremely sad and hard to believe that only AP saw how to make Calculus Super super super easy? Surely there must have been at least 25 million of those 50 million who found the derivative and integral of polynomials a joy and pleasure to do. Surely AP was not the only person in 50 million to see the Polynomial Calculus was a pleasure, fun and even exciting, rush to class to do a derivative or integral of a polynomial-- teacher, please give me more polynomial exercises. They are better than Star Trek on TV.

This is the whole point of a Revolution in Math Calculus.

When we make the only valid function in all of math be a Polynomial, we reduce calculus to adding 1 or subtracting 1.

We do not allow creeps, goons and kooks to clutter the table of math and calculus with their horrible awful smelly functions which are not polynomials. No, we disband these kooks and tell them go home and convert your worthless crap to be a polynomial before you can stink up the halls of mathematics. Convert your kook nonsense to a polynomial then you can come and do mathematics with us.

AP, King of Science

As a case in point, a mere example.

We have at MIT a Dr. Gilbert Strang with his Calculus textbooks, and I bought the 1991 edition of Calculus. And my opinion of Strang's text is scatterbrained. For I often find that Gilbert in lecturing on a topic is too quick to bring in side show issues, never focusing on just one topic.

But worst of this Strang text is he has no valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus FTC, no geometry proof and his Limit analysis of FTC is idiot of a proof-- ie-- no proof at all, for we all analyze things in the course of a day, and none of us are so preposterous as to think we have proven something above and beyond analyzing that something.

And so, I, AP reflects back to the time of 1968, when my name was Ludwig Hansen, sitting in a geology classroom of University of Cincinnati. Learning geology from a textbook that never discusses Continental Drift and this is 1968, mind you and Wegener had given massive evidence of Continental Drift way back to 1915, some 53 years later, AP and the classroom suffering from Truth of Science by having to buy a book about static-Earth, being tested graded lectured upon fake geology.

Not much difference from students sitting in classrooms at MIT or elsewhere buying Strang's CALCULUS with no valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, and where any fool function is allowed to enter, thousands and thousands of fool functions, when Mathematics has only one Valid Function-- the Polynomial function. For you can only arrive at a True Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus by using polynomials as functions.

So how many students every year are punished by having to learn calculus with fool functions, with no valid proof of FTC. Where the calculus classroom puts students not through a Pleasure learning session but a gauntlet torture chamber, whipping the students into nervous breakdowns and vomiting during exams.

All for what??? How much money does Dr. Strang make from his awful book Calculus?? Let me guess estimate.

The book probably costs $100 in our inflation environment. And typically a author gets 1/2 of that in royalties.

Say MIT teaches a class of 100 students in calculus per year would be 50 x 100 = $5,000. And say a estimate that around the world there are 100 schools teaching from this book of 100 students in their classroom would make Gilbert $500,000 per year in book sales of his Calculus.

Same can be said of AP back in 1968 having to learn fake geology with no Continental Drift plate tectonics, so that some so called scientists reaps a reward of 1/2 a million dollars in book sales. And that thousands of students taught lectured and tested upon fake geology.

This is one of the grand benefits of a Usenet and a Internet, that we speed up the process of throwing out Fake -Math, fake-geology and all other fake sciences. Freedom of Speech of Internet of Usenet allows for science to be Showered, Cleaned UP, bathed from its wretched stink of Old fake science. Clean Up their science.

The only valid functions in mathematics are Polynomial Functions, which in turn, makes Calculus be super super super easy. No more vomiting by students in a calculus exam. No more nervous breakdowns by students taking calculus.

AP

Sep 21, 2023, 11:53:39 AMSep 21

to

Hagfish of Math and Slime Eel of Physics Archimedes "struggling for

relevance" Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> makes a total fool

of himself:

Why do you keep trying to brainwash little 5 year old kids?

relevance" Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> makes a total fool

of himself:

Why do you keep trying to brainwash little 5 year old kids?

Reply all

Reply to author

Forward

0 new messages

Search

Clear search

Close search

Google apps

Main menu