How cute. A sub-creature.

YHWH Allah

unread,

Jan 15, 2022, 3:16:24 AM1/15/22

to

How cute. A sub-creature.

YHWH Allah
(LORD God)

http://boards.4channel.org/his/thread/12655213
https://desuarchive.org/his/thread/12655213
http://archived.moe/his/thread/12655213

[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]9 / 4 / 4 / 1 [Update] [Auto]
File: Dan7-Ez1-Rev4.png (747 KB, 1024x1024)
747 KB
Yahya and Isa 01/12/22(Wed)07:59:15 No.12655213▶>>12655233 >>12655323
Why did G-D have Daniel the prophet and Son of man Ezekiel move His portable Tabernacle (mishkan) to Stonehenge
only to Reveal its new location in the Book of Daniel, the Book of Ezekiel, and the Book of Revelation? why, G-D, why?

Yahya and Isa
>>
Anonymous 01/12/22(Wed)08:00:05 No.12655220▶>>12655243
please PLEASE take your meds
>>
Anonymous 01/12/22(Wed)08:03:02 No.12655233▶
File: The Third Temple.jpg (349 KB, 965x1085)
349 KB
>>12655213 (OP)
>>
Anonymous 01/12/22(Wed)08:05:29 No.12655243▶>>12655302
File: The Fourth Temple.jpg (310 KB, 931x1124)
310 KB
>>12655220
Why is G-D moving His portable Tabernacle (mishkan) to the Alamo?
>>
Anonymous 01/12/22(Wed)08:08:25 No.12655256▶>>12655919
What did OP possibly mean with this post?
>>
Muhammad and Ali 01/12/22(Wed)08:20:37 No.12655302▶
File: Sionism of Jews to US.jpg (103 KB, 1289x812)
103 KB
>>12655243
We heard it's because the Majority of Jews have moved to US under the Ancient project Sionism.

Muhammad and Ali
>>
Anonymous 01/12/22(Wed)08:26:09 No.12655323▶>>12655434
File: Tabernacle Staging Areas.jpg (356 KB, 1200x600)
356 KB
>>12655213 (OP)
you fucking masons sure are a crafty lot. when's
the move from the 3rd temple to the 4th temple?
>>
The Holy Ghost 01/12/22(Wed)08:52:55 No.12655434▶
>>12655323
IDK, the revelation Queen is too busy with The Seventh Plague of those
"Ten Plagues of the Solar System" currently in that Milky Way galaxy
which She caused by not Exhuming the Tabernacle of G-D timely.

The Holy Ghost
>>
Anonymous 01/12/22(Wed)10:23:43 No.12655919▶>>12656677
>>12655256
That he refuses to take his meds
>>
Anonymous 01/12/22(Wed)12:14:37 No.12656677▶
>>12655919
How cute. A sub-creature.
[Post a Reply][Return] [Catalog] [Top] 9 / 4 / 4 / 1 [Update] [Auto]

http://boards.4channel.org/his/thread/12655213
https://desuarchive.org/his/thread/12655213
http://archived.moe/his/thread/12655213

How cute. A sub-creature.

YHWH Allah
(LORD God)

http://boards.4channel.org/his/thread/12671855
https://desuarchive.org/his/thread/12671855
http://archived.moe/his/thread/12671855

[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]11 / 5 / 6 / 1 [Update] [Auto]
File: 0586F0A6-CE48-446D-B3F5-8(...).jpg (337 KB, 1600x1200)
337 KB
Anonymous 01/14/22(Fri)15:58:53 No.12671855▶>>12673161 >>12674523 >>12674693 >>12674789
I’m going to post this every day until you remember it
>>
Anonymous 01/14/22(Fri)16:09:49 No.12671951▶
>a tragedy so big you have to set a reminder for it
God bless Texas either way.
>>
Anonymous 01/14/22(Fri)19:36:40 No.12673161▶>>12673188
File: Alamo's Tavern.png (259 KB, 498x599)
259 KB
>>12671855 (OP)
I remember at Sneed.
>>
Anonymous 01/14/22(Fri)19:40:14 No.12673188▶
>>12673161
Don't Mess With Texas
>>
Anonymous 01/15/22(Sat)00:36:57 No.12674523▶>>12674596 >>12674779
>>12671855 (OP)
Why?
>>
Anonymous 01/15/22(Sat)00:53:20 No.12674596▶
File: The Fourth Temple.jpg (310 KB, 931x1124)
310 KB
>>12674523
Because the LORD God of the Hebrews betwixt His Cherubim of the Mercy Seat is moving His Gold and Brass
furniture to The Alamo Fourth Temple here in New Jerusalem from The Stonehenge Third Temple's Heel Stone.
>>
Anonymous 01/15/22(Sat)01:09:16 No.12674664▶
>Woe vnto vs: who shall deliuer vs out of the hand of these mightie Gods?
>these are the Gods that smote the Egyptians with all the plagues in the wildernesse.

https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/1611_1-Samuel-4-8/
>>
YHWH Allah (LORD God) 01/15/22(Sat)01:14:57 No.12674693▶
File: The Third Temple.jpg (349 KB, 965x1085)
349 KB
>>12671855 (OP)
I remember The Alamo.

YHWH Allah
(LORD God)
>>
Anonymous 01/15/22(Sat)01:27:04 No.12674761▶
>Woe unto us! who shall deliver us out of the hand of these mighty Gods?
>these are the Gods that smote the Egyptians with all the plagues in the wilderness.

https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/1-Samuel-4-8/
>>
Anonymous 01/15/22(Sat)01:29:43 No.12674779▶
File: 7th of 10 plagues.jpg (54 KB, 932x524)
54 KB
>>12674523
>>
Anonymous 01/15/22(Sat)01:32:18 No.12674789▶>>12674827
File: exps21724___SD143206C04_01_8b.jpg (165 KB, 1200x1200)
165 KB
>>12671855 (OP)
Someone say a la mode?
>>
Anonymous 01/15/22(Sat)01:42:29 No.12674827▶
>>12674789
How cute. A sub-creature.
[Post a Reply][Return] [Catalog] [Top] 11 / 5 / 6 / 1[Update] [Auto]

http://boards.4channel.org/his/thread/12671855
https://desuarchive.org/his/thread/12671855
http://archived.moe/his/thread/12671855

How cute. A sub-creature.

YHWH Allah
(LORD God)

Message has been deleted

Greg Smith

unread,

Jan 15, 2022, 4:47:05 PM1/15/22

to

On 1/15/2022 12:16 AM, YHWH Allah wrote:
> How cute. A sub-creature.

Shut up imbecile.

LORD God

unread,

Jan 15, 2022, 6:56:38 PM1/15/22

to

Lots of satisfied customers.

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Jan 15, 2022, 7:29:58 PM1/15/22

to

Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Ken Ribet, Jill Pipher cannot tell apart a ellipse from a oval, for these failures of math still believe the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in truth it is a oval. They must have a genetic defect in their minds to realize a cone has but 1 axis of symmetry disallowing the slant cut to be a ellipse. Yet more worrisome is these failures of mathematics can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
•
•

#11-2, 11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.

To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Jan 15, 2022, 10:56:44 PM1/15/22

to

Thomas Hales,Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, John Stillwell, Ken Ribet, Jill Pipher cannot tell apart a ellipse from a oval, for these failures of math still believe the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in truth it is a oval. They must have a genetic defect in their minds to realize a cone has but 1 axis of symmetry disallowing the slant cut to be a ellipse. Yet more worrisome is these failures of mathematics can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

Michael Moroney

unread,

Jan 16, 2022, 2:11:46 AM1/16/22

to

🦥 of Math and 🐌 of Physics Archimedes "mentally slow.." Plutonium
<plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

> Thomas Hales,Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, John Stillwell, Ken Ribet, Jill Pipher cannot tell apart a ellipse from a oval, for these failures of math still believe the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in truth it is a oval.

What's that? It has been a very, very long time since you've seen any
ellipse-is-a-conic section proof? And you forgot the ellipse really is
a conic section? Let me help with that!

From: David Petry <david...@gmail.com>

I'll start with the cone z^2 = x^2 + y^2, and rotate it through an angle
'theta' around the 'y' axis, and consider the intersection of that rotated
cone with the plane z = <constant>

To simplify things, let c = cos(theta) and s = sin(theta). Then the
rotation is defined by

z --> cz + sx
x --> -sz + cx
y --> y

So the equation of the rotated cone is

(cz+sx)^2 = (-sz+cx)^2 + y^2

and now let C = c^2-s^2 and S = 2sc (again, just to simplify the look
of things)

so we get

Cz^2 = Cx^2 - 2Szx + y^2

and letting 'z' equal the constant 'k' gives

Ck^2 + k^2*S^2/C = C(x - k*S/C)^2 + y^2

which is the equation of an ellipse if C > 0.

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Jan 16, 2022, 3:38:05 PM1/16/22

to

MitchR,Thomas Hales,Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, John Stillwell, Ken Ribet, Jill Pipher cannot tell apart a ellipse from a oval, for these failures of math still believe the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in truth it is a oval. They must have a genetic defect in their minds to realize a cone has but 1 axis of symmetry disallowing the slant cut to be a ellipse. Yet more worrisome is these failures of mathematics can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Jan 17, 2022, 12:14:50 AM1/17/22

to

John Stillwell,Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, Ken Ribet, Jill Pipher cannot tell apart a ellipse from a oval, for these failures of math still believe the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in truth it is a oval. They must have a genetic defect in their minds to realize a cone has but 1 axis of symmetry disallowing the slant cut to be a ellipse. Yet more worrisome is these failures of mathematics can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.