_Google Search for a Balanced report_ of "Kibo Parry" , 28 year nonstop stalker with incurable stalker disease, who fails at all math with his inability to even do a proper correct percentage.

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

May 27, 2021, 10:37:26 AM5/27/21

to

_Google Search for a Balanced report_ of "Kibo Parry" , 28 year nonstop stalker with incurable stalker disease, who fails at all math with his inability to even do a proper correct percentage.

James Parry - Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › James_Parry
James Parry (born July 13, 1967), commonly known by his nickname and username Kibo /ˈkaɪboʊ/, is a Usenetter known for his sense of humor, various ...
‎Background · ‎Growing fame · ‎Kibology and alt.religion... · ‎Hallmarks

Kibo Is God | WIREDhttps://www.wired.com › 1993/04 › kibo-is-god
So who is Kibo? Fans might want to stop reading here (spoiler warning) Kibo is James Parry, a 26-year-old graphic designer who lives in Boston. He's tall and ...

James Kibo Parry - C2 wikihttps://wiki.c2.com › JamesKiboParry
Kibo (ki...@world.std.com) was a particularly vocal member of the digerati, who gave the appearance of being omnipresent by immediately contributing to ...

Kibo : Kibo's official sitehttp://www.kibo.com
Dec 25, 2009 — Kibo's Front Door: gateway to www.kibo.com, official site of James (Kibo) Parry.

Kibo (Creator) - TV Tropeshttps://tvtropes.org › Creator
James "Kibo" Parry was one of the first "net.celebrities", known for his machine- assisted ubiquity in Usenet and the surrealist manner in which he responded to ...

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney, not a comic, not a scientist, not a ...https://groups.google.com › sci.math
@gmail.com> fails at math and science: >Why does Jason Herrmann, kibo Parry Moroney want to kill whales or moon bears??? Wait, are you saying I'm Jason ...

Thanks Google for Balanced Search hits, not all slanted in either praise or demonization. But really, why have his second hit as "Kibo is God" is way way out of place, even in Wild West Google Searches. And more likely should have been "Kibo cesspool mind in sci.math & sci.physics". A replacement of that should be Kibo the stalker trying out a percentage problem.

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 19May2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Length: 137 pages

Product details
ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
Publication date : March 14, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1307 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled
Print length : 137 pages
Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Length: 21 pages

File Size: 1620 KB
Print Length: 21 pages
Publication Date: March 11, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PLSDQWC
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray: Not Enabled
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

5th published book

Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
Preface:
First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.

The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.

My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.

Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.

Length: 72 pages

File Size: 773 KB
Print Length: 72 pages
Publication Date: March 12, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PMB69F5
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray:  Not Enabled  
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
 

#4-1, 134th published book

Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had already written the series of TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS in a 7 volume, 8 book set. This would be the first book in that 8 book set (one of the books is a companion book to 1st year college). But I suppose that I needed to write the full series before I could write the Introduction and know what I had to talk about and talk about in a logical progression order. Sounds paradoxical in a sense, that I needed to write the full series first and then go back and write the Introduction. But in another sense, hard to write an introduction on something you have not really fully done and completed. For example to know what is error filled Old Math and to list those errors in a logical order requires me to write the full 7 volumes in order to list in order the mistakes.

Cover Picture: Mathematics begins with counting, with numbers, with quantity. But counting numbers needs geometry for something to count in the first place. So here in this picture of the generalized Hydrogen atom of chemistry and physics is a torus geometry of 8 rings of a proton torus and one ring where my fingers are, is a equator ring that is the muon and thrusting through the proton torus at the equator of the torus. So we count 9 rings in all. So math is created by atoms and math numbers exist because atoms have many geometry figures to count. And geometry exists because atoms have shapes and different figures.

Product details
• ASIN : B08K2XQB4M
• Publication date : September 24, 2020
• Language : English
• File size : 576 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print length : 23 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #4,307,085 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #1,241 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #1,345 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
◦ #10,634 in Calculus (Books)
•

#4-2, 45th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

#1 New Releasein General Geometry

Last revision was 2NOV2020.
Preface: Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education.

This is a textbook series in several volumes that carries every person through all his/her math education starting age 5 up to age 26. Volume 2 is for age 5 year old to that of senior in High School, that is needed to do both science and math. Every other math book is incidental to this series of Teaching True Mathematics.

It is a journal-textbook because Amazon's Kindle offers me the ability to edit overnight, and to change the text, almost on a daily basis. A unique first in education textbooks-- almost a continual overnight editing. Adding new text, correcting text. Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education. Volume 3 carries the Freshperson in College for their math calculus education.

Cover Picture: The Numbers as Integers from 0 to 100, and 10 Grid when dividing by 10, and part of the 100 Grid when dividing by 100. Decimal Grid Numbers are the true numbers of mathematics. The Reals, the rationals & irrationals, the algebraic & transcendentals, the imaginary & Complex, and the negative-numbers are all fake numbers. For, to be a true number, you have to "be counted" by mathematical induction. The smallest Grid system is the Decimal 10 Grid.

Length: 375 pages

Product details
File Size: 2013 KB
Print Length: 375 pages
Publication Date: May 2, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07RG7BVZW
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray:  Not Enabled  
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #274,398 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#27 in General Geometry
#336 in Geometry & Topology (Books)

#4-3, 55th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface: This is volume 3, book 3 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Freshperson students, students of age 18-19. It is the continuation of volume 2 for ages 5 through 18 years old.

The main major topic is the AP-EM equations of electricity and magnetism, the mathematics for the laws of electricity and magnetism; what used to be called the Maxwell Equations of Physics. The 1st Year College Math has to prepare all students with the math for all the sciences. So 1st year college Math is like a huge intersection station that has to prepare students with the math they need to do the hard sciences such as physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, geology, etc. What this means is, 1st year college is calculus that allows the student to work with electricity and magnetism. All the math that is needed to enable students to do electricity and magnetism. In Old Math before this textbook, those Old Math textbooks would end in 1/3 of the text about Arclength, vector space, div, curl, Line Integral, Green's, Stokes, Divergence theorem trying to reach and be able to teach Maxwell Equations. But sadly, barely any Old Math classroom reached that 1/3 ending of the textbook, and left all those college students without any math to tackle electricity and magnetism. And most of Old Math was just muddle headed wrong even if they covered the last 1/3 of the textbook. And that is totally unacceptable in science. This textbook fixes that huge hole and gap in Old Math education.

And there is no way around it, that a course in 1st year College Calculus is going to do a lot of hands on experiment with electricity and magnetism, and is required of the students to buy a list of physics apparatus-- multimeter, galvanometer, coil, bar magnet, alligator clip wires, electromagnet, iron filing case, and possibly even a 12 volt transformer, all shown in the cover picture. The beginning of this textbook and the middle section all leads into the ending of this textbook-- we learn the AP-EM Equations and how to use those equations. And there is no escaping the fact that it has to be hands on physics experiments in the classroom of mathematics.

But, do not be scared, for this is all easy easy easy. For if you passed and enjoyed Volume 1 TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, then I promise you, you will not be stressed with Volume 2, for I go out of my way to make it clear and understandable.

Warning: this is a Journal Textbook, meaning that I am constantly adding new material, constantly revising, constantly fixing mistakes or making things more clear. So if you read this book in August of 2019, chances are it is different when you read it in September 2019. Ebooks allow authors the freedom to improve their textbooks on a ongoing basis.

The 1st year college math should be about the math that prepares any and all students for science, whether they branch out into physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, or math, they should have all the math in 1st year college that will carry them through those science studies. I make every attempt possible to make math easy to understand, easy to learn and hopefully fun.

Cover picture of this textbook are instruments that I used to get numbers for EM theory, the Faraday law, the Ampere law etc. If the student has the money to buy these instruments, I recommend it, only, be careful, because you can electrocute yourself if you are a youngster at heart and more playful than wise, and putting things into wall plugs. I never put any thing in a wall plug at home, other than a electric cord. The cost of these instruments can be rather cheap, and a old train transformer can be obtained to step down the voltage of 120 V to 12V for the electromagnets. Most people that take 1st year college calculus, are generally likely to have these instruments already at home from their parents-- like a multimeter or a old train transformer. Then, the college can always make these tools available for the last chapters where we plug-into the EM equations for Faraday's law and Ampere's law. I firmly am a pragmatist teacher-- meaning-- learning is in the "doing", "doing" and "more doing", not just sitting around and taking notes. I remember hands on experiments and demonstrations in my High School and College classes when I went to school, and can vouch for the fact that long after all other things of those classes faded away, but not the visual hands on experiments.

Length: 140 pages

Product details
File Size: 1322 KB
Print Length: 140 pages
Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
Publication Date: August 16, 2019
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07WN9RVXD
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray:  Not Enabled  
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,212,707 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2719 in Calculus (Books)
#417 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
 

#4-4, 56th published book

COLLEGE CALCULUS GUIDE to help students recognize math professor spam from math truth & reality// math textbook series, book 4 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

#1 New Releasein 15-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

This textbook is the companion guide book to AP's Teaching True Mathematics, 1st year College. It is realized that Old Math will take a long time in removing their fake math, so in the interim period, this Guide book is designed to speed up the process of removing fake Calculus out of the education system, the fewer students we punish with forcing them with fake Calculus, the better we are.
Cover Picture: This book is part comedy, for when you cannot reason with math professors that they have many errors to fix, that 90% of their Calculus is in error, you end up resorting to comedy, making fun of them, to prod them to fix their errors. To prod them to "do right by the students of the world" not their entrenched propaganda.
Length: 54 pages

Product details
File Size: 1035 KB
Print Length: 64 pages
Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
Publication Date: August 18, 2019
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07WNGLQ85
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray:  Not Enabled  
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #253,425 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#38 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#318 in Calculus (Books)
#48 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
 

#4-5, 72nd published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 4 for age 19-20 Sophomore-year College, math textbook series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface: This is volume 4, book 5 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Sophomore-year students, students of age 19-20. It is the continuation of volume 3 in the end-goal of learning how to do the mathematics of electricity and magnetism, because everything in physics is nothing but atoms and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. To know math, you have to know physics. We learned the Calculus of 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. But we did not learn the calculus of those equations for 3rd dimension. So, you can say that Sophomore year College math is devoted to 3D Calculus. This sophomore year college we fill in all the calculus, and we start over on all of Geometry, for geometry needs a modern day revision. And pardon me for this book is mostly reading, and the students doing less calculations. The classroom of this textbook has the teacher go through page by page to get the students comprehending and understanding of what is being taught. There are many hands on experiments also.

Cover Picture shows some toruses, some round some square, torus of rings, thin strips of rings or squares and shows them laid flat. That is Calculus of 3rd dimension that lays a ring in a torus to be flat in 2nd dimension.
Length: 103 pages

Product details
File Size: 949 KB
Print Length: 103 pages
Publication Date: December 2, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B0828M34VL
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray: Not Enabled
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

#4-6, 75th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 5 for age 20-21 Junior-year of College, math textbook series, book 6 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium 2019

Preface: This is volume 5, book 6 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Junior-year students, students of age 20-21. In first year college Calculus we learned calculus of the 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. And in sophomore year we learned calculus of 3rd dimension to complete our study of the mathematics needed to do the physics of electricity and magnetism. Now, junior year college, we move onto something different, for we focus mostly on logic now and especially the logic of what is called the "mathematical proof". Much of what the student has learned about mathematics so far has been given to her or him as stated knowledge, accept it as true because I say so. But now we are going to do math proofs. Oh, yes, we did prove a few items here and there, such as why the Decimal Grid Number system is so special, such as the Pythagorean Theorem, such as the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with its right-triangle hinged up or down. But many ideas we did not prove, we just stated them and expected all students to believe them true. And you are now juniors in college and we are going to start to prove many of those ideas and teach you "what is a math proof". Personally, I myself feel that the math proof is overrated, over hyped. But the math proof is important for one reason-- it makes you better scientists of knowing what is true and what is a shaky idea. A math proof is the same as "thinking straight and thinking clearly". And all scientists need to think straight and think clearly. But before we get to the Mathematics Proof, we have to do Probability and Statistics. What you learned in Grade School, then High School, then College, called Sigma Error, now becomes Probability and Statistics. It is important because all sciences including mathematics needs and uses Probability and Statistics. So, our job for junior-year of college mathematics is all cut out and ahead for us, no time to waste, let is get going.

Cover Picture: is a sample of the Array Proof, a proof the ellipse is not a conic but rather a cylinder cut wherein the oval is the slant cut of a cone, not the ellipse.

Length: 160 pages

Product details
ASIN : B0836F1YF6
Publication date : December 26, 2019
Language : English
File size : 740 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled
Print length : 160 pages
Lending : Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #3,768,255 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #3,591 in Probability & Statistics (Kindle Store)
◦ #19,091 in Probability & Statistics (Books)

 
#4-7, 89th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 6 for age 21-22 Senior-year of College, math textbook series, book 7 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium 2020

Last revision was 30OCT2020.
Preface: This is the last year of College for mathematics and we have to mostly summarize all of mathematics as best we can. And set a new pattern to prepare students going on to math graduate school. A new pattern of work habits, because graduate school is more of research and explore on your own. So in this final year, I am going to eliminate tests, and have it mostly done as homework assignments.

Cover Picture: Again and again, many times in math, the mind is not good enough alone to think straight and clear, and you need tools to hands-on see how it works. Here is a collection of tools for this senior year college classes. There is a pencil, clipboard, graph paper, compass, divider, protractor, slide-ruler. And for this year we spend a lot of time on the parallelepiped, showing my wood model, and showing my erector set model held together by wire loops in the corners. The plastic square is there only to hold up the erector set model.

Length: 109 pages

Product details
File Size: 822 KB
Print Length: 109 pages
Publication Date: February 15, 2020
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B084V11BGY
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray:  Not Enabled  
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
 

#4-8, 90th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 7 for age 22-26 Graduate school, math textbook series, book 8 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium 2020

Last revised 1NOV2020.
Preface: This is College Graduate School mathematics. Congratulations, you made it this far. To me, graduate school is mostly research, research mathematics and that means also physics. So it is going to be difficult to do math without physics. Of course, we focus on the mathematics of these research projects.

My textbook for Graduate school is just a template and the professors teaching the graduate students are free of course to follow their own projects, but in terms of being physics and math combined. What I list below is a template for possible projects.

So, in the below projects, I list 36 possible research projects that a graduate student my like to undertake, or partake. I list those 36 projects with a set of parentheses like this (1), (2), (3), etc. Not to be confused with the chapters listing as 1), 2), 3), etc. I list 36 projects but the professor can offer his/her own list, and I expect students with their professor, to pick a project and to monitor the student as to his/her progresses through the research. I have listed each project then cited some of my own research into these projects, below each project is an entry. Those entries are just a help or helper in getting started or acquainted with the project. The entry has a date time group and a newsgroup that I posted to such as sci.math or plutonium-atom-universe Google newsgroups. Again the entry is just a help or helper in getting started.

Now instead of picking one or two projects for your Graduate years of study, some may select all 36 projects where you write a short paper on each project. Some may be bored with just one or two projects and opt for all 36.

Cover Picture: A photo by my iphone of a page on Permutations of the Jacobs book Mathematics: A Human Endeavor, 1970. One of the best textbooks ever written in Old Math, not for its contents because there are many errors, but for its teaching style. It is extremely rare to find a math textbook written for the student to learn. Probably because math professors rarely learned how to teach in the first place; only learned how to unintentionally obfuscate. The page I photographed is important because it is the interface between geometry's perimeter or surface area versus geometry's area or volume, respectively. Or, an interface of pure numbers with that of geometry. But I have more to say on this below.
Length: 174 pages

Product details
File Size: 741 KB
Print Length: 174 pages
Publication Date: March 1, 2020
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B085DF8R7V
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray:  Not Enabled  
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
 

Message has been deleted

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Jun 24, 2021, 5:54:39 PM6/24/21

to

Kibo Parry M. complaining, he has fair Google search list but not Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales with no COUNTERPOINT on first page, only sugar coated propaganda-- oh the baby boy genius when in reality they are Failures of Math, see below

> Michael Moroney's profile photo
> Michael Moroney wrote:
> Jun 20, 2021, 11:07:11 PM
> "Court Jester of Physics"
> Michael Moroney's profile photo
> Michael Moroney wrote:
> Jun 20, 2021, 11:11:48 PM
>Physics Stooge"

All of Wiles & Tao Google search hits are sugar coated baby boy genius, but Google should have a CounterPoint hit on each of their 1st pages. Maybe the below is too harsh but the reality is that Tao & Wiles are math failures, not geniuses

So you Google Search "Harvard Dr. Hau" and you find Balanced Honest Search List with a Counterpoint in Dr. Hau's first page.

But you Google Search Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Thomas Hales and you find nothing but propaganda, brainwash of sugar coated baby boy genius at his award trophy cabinet.

When the truth and reality of the matter is they are math failures, so stupid in math that they cannot be bothered by making a homemade paper cone and dropping a Kerr lid inside and at a slant, it is not a ellipse but a OVAL.

And then those three oafs of math knew that Calculus was geometry, or did they? And calculus being geometry demands a geometrical proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Yet all they can do is the fakery "limit analysis".

Then there is the matter of Logic for you need logic to do a math proof. And yet those three oafs still teach the fakery Boole logic with AND truth table being TFFF when in reality it is TTTF so that you can have 2 AND 1= 3 and not the Boole fakery of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.

Yet the world puts these three oafs on a pedestal of math achievement when the truth of the matter is-- they are con-artists out for fame and fortune, and the truth be damnation.

So those three need this Counterpoint on their first page of a Google hit list.

A thread of this was found in "Terence Tao Plutonium" but it should be found in simply "Terence Tao" as a counterpoint to the awful 5 million hits of sugar coated baby boy genius

novaBBS - sci.math - 1-Shit for brains in math-- Andrew Wiles ...
From: Archimedes Plutonium ... Shit for brains in math-- Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ken Ribet never a geometry proof ...

Now maybe that is too harsh, but the thread in sci.math of these are good for Tao and for Wiles and for Hales.

Re: Terence Tao flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
By Jan 88 posts 4864 views updated 2:20 PM

Re: Why is John Stillwell such a numbskull on Irrational numbers-- his book Mathematics and its History
By Zelos Malum 46 posts 500 views updated 2:29 PM

Re: Thomas Hales flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
By Jan 25 posts 653 views updated 2:26 PM

Re: Andrew Wiles flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
By Zelos Malum 67 posts 1027 views updated 2:22 PM

Google is JOURNALISM and we would be sick and tired of PBS NEWSHOUR if all they ever did was interview a Republican and never a counterpoint of a Democrat. Same thing goes for math propaganda of Tao, Wiles, Hales of 5 million hits of sugar coated nonsense.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Jun 21, 2021, 1:47:29 AM (4 days ago)



to
On Monday, June 21, 2021 at 1:34:35 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> A thread of this was found in "Terence Tao Plutonium" but it should be found in simply "Terence Tao" as a counterpoint to the awful 5 million hits of sugar coated baby boy genius
>
> novaBBS - sci.math - 1-Shit for brains in math-- Andrew Wiles ...
> From: Archimedes Plutonium ... Shit for brains in math-- Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ken Ribet never a geometry proof ...
>

And this is probably how mechanically, they skew the search hits. They put in a command that any "plutonium" in a search hit of Terence Tao cannot be included in a search of "Terence Tao". So that Princeton Univ or Google or UCLA attach a "delete any hit with plutonium" in a Terence Tao search list.

But, Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales need a COUNTERPOINT in their very first Google list. For all three were too stupid in math to do any of these-- calculus, ellipse-oval, Boole corrected.

3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Length: 21 pages

File Size: 1620 KB
Print Length: 21 pages
Publication Date: March 11, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PLSDQWC
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray: Not Enabled
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

#8-2, 11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 19May2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Length: 137 pages

Product details
ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
Publication date : March 14, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1307 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled
Print length : 137 pages
Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

5th published book

Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
Preface:
First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.

The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.

My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.

Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.

Length: 72 pages

File Size: 773 KB
Print Length: 72 pages
Publication Date: March 12, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PMB69F5
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray:  Not Enabled  
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported

Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
 

Google came into existence at the nexus of Old Math-- journal editors as little dictators of math journals, where the old method of math proofs was merely a country club of old men trying to secure favors, but never concerned about "math truth". Time and time again in Old Math with their journal editors being corrupt for math and printing b.s. as the truth. We see it today in Jill Pipher's AMS refusing to admit to the truth that a single cone slant cut is the OVAL never the ellipse, and here Jill is supposed to be all about math truth, not her corrupt stance to keep AP out of the news, to deny even the fact that Jill is terrible in math, for Jill does not even recognize that calculus is geometry, yet there she sits with her mindless limit analysis of a fake proof.

So in this world of country club fake math proffered onto the world public as the 1990s was the last decade before the Internet can expose fakery and corruption like that of Andrew Wiles, being perhaps the last fake con-artist mathematician driven with the power of having had a Journal editor dictatorship to get his awful abhorrent FLT across the finish line.

For in this new world of SCIENCE REPORTING, because the Internet is here and many many people can offer their wisdom and not the corrupt country club having it all their way, 100% their way with all objections muffled and stifled. Here the Internet has replaced Science Reporting to large extent and opened the doors to Free Speech in Science. Wiles can run, but his proof is going nowhere but the trashpile of shame.

And so, Wiles and Tao and Hales have enlisted Google Search engines to better their corruption of math by stacking their search lists all in favor of their con-artistry. But, unknown to them, it is just because of the Freedom of Speech that the Internet offers, that their use of Google Search as a propaganda tool in the favor of Wiles, Tao, Hales, and in physics Weinberg, Glashow, Higgs, it is the Internet that exposes the corruption of corrupt scientists, who play with the Truth of Science all to garner fame and fortune, but never the truth.

Wiles never proved FLT and in fact was so so very stupid on FLT that his tiny math mind never realized Euler had no proof of FLT in exponent 3 and Wiles depended his entire argument on having a Euler proof of exponent 3.

So, the trouble with Google Search in this new era of science reporting, is that Google Search is pandering to corrupt con-artists with never a COUNTERPOINT hit on the first page of a major issue of science. Tao's and Wiles's and Hales's Google search hits are in the millions and all of them sugar coated b.s. All of them "baby boy genius or award trophy cabinet stock full"

Yet, not a single one of these con-artists of math admit that calculus is geometry and where is their geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

So Google Search, needs and requires a Counterpoint hit on 1st page of Tao, Hales, Wiles. Google is a JOURNALISM platform and good journalism like PBS Newshour never has just always the opinion of Republicans only, with never a Democrat viewpoint. Yet Google up to this date is slanted all in one direction-- the IQ of baby boy genius Tao who is so stupid in math that he never can do a geometry proof of Calculus FTC.

The true proof, the valid proof of FLT was given by AP, and although Wiles did not steal AP's proof, Wiles did steal AP's fair share of fame and awards, for no-one has proven FLT until AP did so in 1991.

We will see, if the Internet not only changes how Science is reported, but whether the Internet, now can mete out justice on Wiles stealing the fame and fortune of FLT proof, stealing it from AP. Whether the Internet also serves as a Justice platform and removes the trophy cabinet from Wiles for his fake and corrupt FLT, his nonsense of a proof.

2) AP proved Fermat's Last Theorem in 1991-1993 while Andrew Wiles has a fake proof of FLT.

AP proved Fermat's Last Theorem in 1991-1993 while Andrew Wiles has a fake proof of FLT.

A short list of errors by Andrew Wiles on his FLT.

1) Reductio ad Absurdum is never a proof method that is valid in mathematics, and it shows on Wiles's FLT for he is never able to bridge over and prove the Generalized FLT, in fact, his method sits there as a one off-- math offering, unable to kindle the proof of any other math conjecture. (See AP's book on fixing Logic below).

2) Wiles was so backwards in research in FLT that he failed to see that Euler's offering of a proof on exponent 3 of FLT was not a proof either, for Euler forgot the case of when x, y, z are three even numbers in x^3 + y^3 = z^3. And Wiles proof-offering is dependent on Euler having had a proof in exponent 3 for his elliptic curves.

3) A genuine true proof of FLT is able to easily bridge the gap of Generalized FLT of that of A^x + B^y = C^z, all A,B,C,x,y,z being Counting Numbers. Yet Andrew Wiles offering fails miserably on that account. But AP's proof based on Counting Numbers Basis Vector of 2+2 = 2x2 = 2^2 = 4, yet for exponent 3, no basis vector exists such that n+n+n = nxnxn = n^3 = a actual counting number.

Andrew Wiles did not steal AP's proof, but Andrew Wiles stole all the fame and fortune of the true world's first proof of Fermat's Last Theorem. Andrew Wiles offering is a fakery, a con-artist job of massive publicity all because he was a head editor of a math journal at Princeton University. This allowed him extra privileges of propanganda and brainwash of the general public. But we are going to see if the power of the world's Internet can bring to light the fact that AP did the world's first proof of Fermat's Last Theorem in 1991-1993, and that Wiles had stolen the honors from AP with his joke of a offering.

6th published book

World's First Valid Proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem, 1993 & 2014 // Math proof series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 29Apr2021. This is AP's 6th published book.

Preface:
Real proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem// including the fake Euler proof in exp3 and Wiles fake proof.

Recap summary: In 1993 I proved Fermat's Last Theorem with a pure algebra proof, arguing that because of the special number 4 where 2 + 2 = 2^2 = 2*2 = 4 that this special feature of a unique number 4, allows for there to exist solutions to A^2 + B^2 = C^2. That the number 4 is a basis vector allowing more solutions to exist in exponent 2. But since there is no number with N+N+N = N*N*N that exists, there cannot be a solution in exp3 and the same argument for higher exponents. In 2014, I went and proved Generalized FLT by using "condensed rectangles". Once I had proven Generalized, then Regular FLT comes out of that proof as a simple corollary. So I had two proofs of Regular FLT, pure algebra and a corollary from Generalized FLT. Then recently in 2019, I sought to find a pure algebra proof of Generalized FLT, and I believe I accomplished that also by showing solutions to Generalized FLT also come from the special number 4 where 2 + 2 = 2^2 = 2*2 = 4. Amazing how so much math comes from the specialness of 4, where I argue that a Vector Space of multiplication provides the Generalized FLT of A^x + B^y = C^z.

Cover Picture: In my own handwriting, some Generalized Fermat's Last Theorem type of equations.

As for the Euler exponent 3 invalid proof and the Wiles invalid FLT, both are missing a proof of the case of all three A,B,C are evens (see in the text).
Length: 156 pages
File Size: 1503 KB
Print Length: 156 pages

Publication Date: March 12, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English

ASIN: B07PQKGW4M

Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
 

#6-2, 27th published book

Correcting Reductio Ad Absurdum// Teaching True Logic series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)


• Publication date : March 23, 2019
• Language : English
• File size : 1178 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Print length : 86 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #346,875 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #28 in Logic (Kindle Store)
◦ #95 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #217 in Mathematical Logic
•

#6-3, 143rd published book

DeMorgan's Laws are fantasies, not laws// Teaching True Logic series, book 3 Kindle Edition
By Archimedes Plutonium

Last revision was 30Apr2021. This is AP's 143rd published book.

Preface: The Logic community never had the correct truth table of the primitive 4 connectors of Logic, (1) Equal compounded with NOT, (2) AND, (3) OR, (4) IF->THEN. In 1800s, the founders of Logic messed up in terrible error all 4 of the primitive logic connectors. And since the 1990s, AP has wanted an explanation of why Old Logic got all 4 connectors in total error? What was the reason for the mess up? And in the past few years, I finally pinned the reason to starting Logic with DeMorgan's fake laws, from which Boole, a close friend of DeMorgan, was going to keep his friendship and accept the DeMorgan Laws. That meant that DeMorgan, Boole, Jevons accepted OR as being that of Either..Or..Or..Both, what is called the inclusive OR. But the inclusive OR is a contradiction in terms, for there never can exist a combo of OR with AND simultaneously. This book goes into detail why the DeMorgan laws are fake and fantasy.

Cover Picture: Looks a bit rough, but I want students and readers to see my own handwriting as if this were a lecture and the cover picture a blackboard where I write out DeMorgan's two (fake) laws of logic.

Product details
• File Size : 620 KB
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 38 pages
• ASIN : B08M4BY4XM
• Publication Date : October 27, 2020
• Language: : English
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Lending : Enabled
•
•

#6-4, 100th published book

Pragmatism, the only Philosophy I loved // Teaching True Logic series, book 4 Kindle Edition
By Archimedes Plutonium

I need to give credit to the philosophy of Pragmatism, the only philosophy that I know of that is based on science. Credit for my discovery of the Plutonium Atom Totality in 1990, came in part, partially due to a passage of the Pragmatist Charles Sanders Peirce in Peirce's Cosmology:

Peirce's The Architecture of Theories...
...would be a Cosmogonic Philosophy. It would suppose that in the beginning - infinitely remote - there was a chaos of unpersonalized feeling, which being without connection or regularity would properly be without existence. This feeling, sporting here and there in pure arbitrariness, would have
started the germ of a generalizing tendency. Its other sportings would be evanescent, but this would have a growing virtue. Thus, the tendency to habit would be started; and from this, with the other principles of evolution, all the regularities of the universe would be evolved. At any time, however, an element of pure chance survives and will remain until the world becomes an absolutely perfect, rational, and symmetrical system, in which mind is at last crystallized in the infinitely distant future.
--- end quoting Peirce's Cosmology ---

But also I must give credit to Pragmatism for making it a philosophy one can actually live their lives by, for living a life of pragmatic solutions to everyday problems that occur in my life. A case in point example is now in March 2020, being the pragmatist that I am, and enduring the 2020 corona virus pandemic. No other philosophy that I know of is so keenly in tune with a person, the surrounding environment and how to live.
Length: 123 pages

Product details
• File size : 807 KB
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 123 pages
• Publication date : March 14, 2020
• ASIN : B085X863QW
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #4,160,707 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #61,471 in Philosophy (Kindle Store)
◦ #193,599 in Science & Math (Kindle Store)
◦ #240,849 in Philosophy (Books)

3> Google came into existence at the nexus of Old Math-- journal editors as little dictators of math journals, where the old method of math proofs was merely a country club of old men trying to secure favors, but never concerned about "math truth". Time and time again in Old Math with their journal editors being corrupt for math and printing b.s. as the truth. We see it today in Jill Pipher's AMS refusing to admit to the truth that a single cone slant cut is the OVAL never the ellipse, and here Jill is supposed to be all about math truth, not her corrupt stance to keep AP out of the news, to deny even the fact that Jill is terrible in math, for Jill does not even recognize that calculus is geometry, yet there she sits with her mindless limit analysis of a fake proof.

Andrew Wiles is probably the last of his kind in mathematics, where a fool of math trumps up his achievements which are hollow and nonexistent, all because his over testosterone to gain fame and fortune, the truth of math be damn. The fool Wiles cannot even see that Euler had no valid proof in exponent 3, yet that very same fool thinks he proved FLT. Wiles never belonged in math, perhaps a accountant or bank teller, for there you need not have to prove something, just do a honest days work.

And so Google, being new to the world in the 1990s, never realized that they are JOURNALISM and good journalism never covers only one side of a issue, but the other side. And here, Google failed proper journalism with their obnoxious 5 million hits all saying what a great mathematician, and the AP Counterpoint never showing up in a biased propaganda Google Search. Only if you search "Andrew Wiles Plutonium" do you get the fair balanced Counterpoint. But this Counterpoint should be on the first page of all Google search hits of "Andrew Wiles".

If Google can be fair with Counterpoint on Harvard's Dr. Hau, then no excuse for Google to be fair with Andrew Wiles, the flunky of math with not even a geometry proof of Calculus, FTC.

2> Google does a fair, accurate, honest with Counterpoint Search list on Harvard Univ Dr. Hau where she refuses to finish her slow light experiment only because it will prove that AP was correct-- light waves are closed loop circuits back to the source of the light. But, a Google Search of Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales reveals only 5 million hits or more that is pure propaganda, sugar coated propaganda to elevate con-artist failures of math with their con-artist trickery, when neither Wiles, Tao, Hales can even do a valid proof or geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. So, apparently, Google is aiding and abetting con artist fakery in math, where they figured out how to skew in favor of con-artists, carnival barkers.

Message has been deleted

Michael Moroney

unread,

Jun 30, 2021, 12:02:54 PM6/30/21

to

💩 for 🧠 Archimedes "Putin's Stooge" Plutonium
<plutonium....@gmail.com> tarded:

> 21) AP's 174th book// Mathopedia-- Listing of 70 fakes and mistakes of Old Math.
>
1) Ludwig Poehlmann
2) Ludwig Hansen
3) Ludwig van Ludvig
4) Ludwig Plutonium
5) Archimedes Plutonium
6) Archimedes Plutonium
...
70) Archimedes Plutonium

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Jun 30, 2021, 3:42:29 PM6/30/21

to

Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell failures of math, who never thought Calculus is geometry and thus, never sought for a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. These people need a Counterpoint on 1st page of their Google Search list stating they were so dumb in math, never connected that calculus is geometry, therefore a geometry proof of FTC is primal concern.

AP revolution in College textbooks TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS read for free the worlds finest math textbooks available-- containing geometry proofs of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

No more of this racket of college textbooks costing $100 or more, and not even have a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

#4-1, 134th published book

Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had already written the series of TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS in a 7 volume, 8 book set. This would be the first book in that 8 book set (one of the books is a companion book to 1st year college). But I suppose that I needed to write the full series before I could write the Introduction and know what I had to talk about and talk about in a logical progression order. Sounds paradoxical in a sense, that I needed to write the full series first and then go back and write the Introduction. But in another sense, hard to write an introduction on something you have not really fully done and completed. For example to know what is error filled Old Math and to list those errors in a logical order requires me to write the full 7 volumes in order to list in order the mistakes.

Cover Picture: Mathematics begins with counting, with numbers, with quantity. But counting numbers needs geometry for something to count in the first place. So here in this picture of the generalized Hydrogen atom of chemistry and physics is a torus geometry of 8 rings of a proton torus and one ring where my fingers are, is a equator ring that is the muon and thrusting through the proton torus at the equator of the torus. So we count 9 rings in all. So math is created by atoms and math numbers exist because atoms have many geometry figures to count. And geometry exists because atoms have shapes and different figures.

Product details
• ASIN : B08K2XQB4M
• Publication date : September 24, 2020
• Language : English
• File size : 576 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print length : 23 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #4,307,085 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #1,241 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #1,345 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
◦ #10,634 in Calculus (Books)
•

#4-2, 45th published book

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

#1 New Release in General Geometry

Last revision was 25Jun2021. And this is AP's 55th published book of science.

Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019

Preface: This is volume 3, book 3 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Freshperson students, 1st year college students of age 18-19. It is the continuation of volume 2 for ages 5 through 18 years old.

The main major topic is the AP-EM equations of electricity and magnetism, the mathematics for the laws of electricity and magnetism; what used to be called the Maxwell Equations of Physics. The 1st Year College Math has to prepare all students with the math for all the sciences. So 1st year college Math is like a huge intersection station that has to prepare students with the math they need to do the hard sciences such as physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, geology, etc. What this means is, 1st year college is calculus that allows the student to work with electricity and magnetism. All the math that is needed to enable students to do electricity and magnetism. In Old Math before this textbook, those Old Math textbooks would end in 1/3 of the text about Arclength, vector space, div, curl, Line Integral, Green's, Stokes, Divergence theorem trying to reach and be able to teach Maxwell Equations. But sadly, barely any Old Math classroom reached that 1/3 ending of the textbook, and left all those college students without any math to tackle electricity and magnetism. And most of Old Math was just muddle headed wrong even if they covered the last 1/3 of the textbook. And that is totally unacceptable in science. This textbook fixes that huge hole and gap in Old Math education.

And there is no way around it, that a course in 1st year College Calculus is going to do a lot of hands on experiment with electricity and magnetism, and is required of the students to buy a list of physics apparatus-- multimeter, galvanometer, coil, bar magnet, alligator clip wires, electromagnet, iron filing case, and possibly even a 12 volt transformer, all shown in the cover picture. The beginning of this textbook and the middle section all leads into the ending of this textbook-- we learn the AP-EM Equations and how to use those equations. And there is no escaping the fact that it has to be hands on physics experiments in the classroom of mathematics.

But, do not be scared, for this is all easy easy easy. For if you passed and enjoyed Volume 2 TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, then I promise you, you will not be stressed with Volume 3, for I go out of my way to make it clear and understandable.

Warning: this is a Journal Textbook, meaning that I am constantly adding new material, constantly revising, constantly fixing mistakes or making things more clear. So if you read this book in August of 2019, chances are it is different when you read it in September 2019. Ebooks allow authors the freedom to improve their textbooks on a ongoing basis.

The 1st year college math should be about the math that prepares any and all students for science, whether they branch out into physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, or math, they should have all the math in 1st year college that will carry them through those science studies. I make every attempt possible to make math easy to understand, easy to learn and hopefully fun.

Length: 236 pages

Product details
File Size: 1390 KB
Print Length: 236 pages

Message has been deleted

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Jul 5, 2021, 1:08:21 AM7/5/21

to

NSF, Dr. Panchanathan, in addition to $100 per stalker post by Kibo Parry M, does he get "gas mileage and free breakfast" before he reaches the office to start a new stalker day?

I remember myself before going into the Navy as a officer, that the military pays for gas mileage and even a free breakfast at the motel, at the time the Navy flew me to Washington to have a Naval officer ask me if I knew Fourier Transform, then back to Salt Lake City and a motel and breakfast. So Dr. Panchanathan is Kibo Parry M delighting in all these bonuses in his "day of stalking"?

Kibo Parry Moroney stalker of 28 years of scientists, or, paid for stalker? The 28 year long stalking of AP by kibo Parry Moroney makes one think that the NSF, National Science Foundation is paying for kibo Parry to stalk, paying him and World std perhaps $100 of taxpayer dollars for every stalking post that Kibo emits. So yes, if you are paid such easy money just to post ad hominem spam, then you too would probably want some of that almost free money. Even though many in the education sector are irate over paying stalkers to stalk, because, well, they have to actually teach the classroom of math and science, while Kibo rakes in 5x their salary.

---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993

Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua

Well, Dr. Panchanathan, I guess it can come out of the next trillion dollar spending and maybe "internet stalking" is some form of Infrastructure, keep the bridges and roads in good shape.



Michael Moroney's profile photo
Michael Moroney

Re: Archimedes "kilotard" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
11:29 PM


Michael Moroney's profile photo
Michael Moroney

Re: Archimedes "tard" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
11:25 PM


Michael Moroney's profile photo
Michael Moroney

unread,
Re: Archimedes "doofus" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
11:22 PM

Message has been deleted

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Jul 9, 2021, 3:20:02 AM7/9/21

to

sci.physics

Web results for "Harvard Dr Hau"
3rd hit 1st page "Harvard Dr.Hau"

Thanks Google for Balanced Search Hits on Harvard's Dr. Hau ...

3rd hit 1st page "Harvard Dr.Hau" is fair honest balanced Google Search list with Counterpoint as 3rd hit// Contrast that to the dishonest corrupt ...

sci.physics
Google, great job on Harvard Dr. Hau, lousy pitiful job on Thomas Hales ...
Google, great job on Harvard Dr. Hau, lousy pitiful job on Thomas Hales, Sheldon Glashow as some propaganda pitch as if Search engines have become science-propaganda-kiosks, instead of Balanced Journalism with Counterpoint. Is Google trying to
Archimedes Plutonium Jun 25, 2021, 8:43:01 PM

sci.physics
Balanced & Counterpoint Google Search for Steven Weinberg, not ...

sci.physics
1st page 2nd & 3rd hits for Univ Texas Steven Weinberg, under Google Search ...

sci.physics
Balanced & Counterpoint Google Search list for Steven Weinberg, Sheldon ...
to Plutonium Atom Universe. Balanced & Counterpoint Google Search list for Steven Weinberg, Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, the day when millions of search hits ...

sci.physics
1 -Kibo Parry Moroney on failed physicist Sheldon Glashow who ...

sci.math
Excellent job Google Search for Queen's James Leech, hope of fixing logic and ...

4th hit 1st page is CounterPoint for "James Leech Queen's" with Arthur B. McDonald ...

sci.math

2nd page under "Michael Meighen McGill"

Re: 176,232-Student Victims of Michael Meighen McGill Univ by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of ...

sci.math
Possible explanation for bias & prejudicial Google search engine ...

sci.math
Andrew Wiles plutonium or Terence Tao plutonium. As evidenced by this. with his fake FLT, for he lusts for fame ... to Plutonium Atom Universe. Math Con-Artist ...

sci.math
Re: 2Terence Tao flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test - Google Groups

sci.math
Math Con-Artist Andrew Wiles with his fake FLT, for he lusts for fame ...
to Plutonium Atom Universe. Math Con-Artist Andrew Wiles with his fake FLT, for he lusts for fame and fortune but never the truth of mathematics. The nitwit ...

sci.math
3) AP proved Fermat's Last Theorem in 1991-1993 while Andrew Wiles has a ...

sci.math
2nd page under "Rose M Patten".

8-Student victims of Rose M. Patten Univ Toronto from stalker Dan ...
8-Student victims of Rose M. Patten Univ Toronto from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of ...

8-Student victims of Rose M. Patten Univ Toronto from stalker Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus On Monday, April 5, 2021 at 7:45:08 AM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrot
Archimedes Plutonium Apr 5, 2021, 11:12:19 AM

1st page first 3 hits for Univ Toronto Rose M Patten, under Google Search "Rose M ...
The above was the 1st page of "Rose M Patten plutonium", but no-one other than myself is going to make such a search. Google Search is JOURNALISM, but bad ...

6-Student victims of Rose M. Patten Univ Toronto from stalker Dan ...

sci.math

1st page first 3 hits for Univ Toronto Rose M Patten, under Google Search "Rose M ...

1st page first 3 hits for Univ Toronto Rose M Patten, under Google Search "Rose M Patten plutonium", should be on 1st page of search list for "Rose M Patten"
Archimedes Plutonium Jul 4, 2021, 4:29:00 PM

Kibo Parry under "kibo parry" 6th & 7th hits on 1st page of Google Search list

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney, not a comic, not a scientist, not a ...https://groups.google.com › sci.math
@gmail.com> fails at math and science: >Why does Jason Herrmann, kibo Parry Moroney want to kill whales or moon bears??? Wait, are you saying I'm Jason ...

_Google Search for a Balanced report_ of "Kibo Parry" , 28 year nonstop stalker with incurable stalker disease, who fails at all math with his inability to even do a proper correct percentage.

Jan Burse, under "jan burse" 9th & 10th & 11th hit on 1st page of a Google Search list

9th and 10th hit on first page of a Google Search of "Jan Burse"
----JAN BURSE BARRED FROM comp.lang.prolog ... - Google Groups
REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION - BAN JAN BURSE WADDA Ya SAY JAN? time to take a break... you can answer c.l.p questions 2026. Mostowski Collapse's profile ...

Joel Mesot of Zurich ETH, why cannot the idiot Jan Burse ...
Joel Mesot of Zurich ETH, why cannot the idiot Jan Burse understand Boole logic is all wrong with his 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, is Jan Burse a ...

Narkive
Kick Jan Burse out of sci.math and mathematics for attacks, forgery and ...
We can see already that Jan Burse has elevated his stalking by trying to tear down the website in Wikipedia of Archimedes Plutonium, and then likely-- but no proof ...

Dan Christensen, under "dan christensen math" 5th hit on 1st page of a Google Search list

Thank you Google, thank you for having Balanced Reported Google Search hits of Dan Christensen for on his 1st page of Google hits the 7th entry on 1st page reads:

Re: Canada's Dan Christensen of Univ Western Ontario flunked the Math Test of...
>Can you provide a Geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus? If not, well, you flunked mathematics.
>Dan Christensen flunked the Math Test of a...

Earle Jones, under "earle jones stanford" 2nd and 3rd hits on 1st page of Google Search list

Re: Earle Jones says Stanford physics dept is too stupid to see a ellipse is not a ...
Earle Jones talks about Stanford Univ; and why they are physics failures with their proton-electron of 938 to 0.5MeV which no hydrogen atom can exist, for the true ...

Stanford Univ & Google, where is this heading for, for Earle Jones & Kibo ...

MATH

Kibo Parry M on failures of math for they never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, or were aware they had to do such.

..
.- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
, . `.' ' `.
.' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
. ; .' . `. ;
; . ' `. . '
. ' ` `. |
. '. '
. 0 0 ' `.
' `
; `
.' `
; U `
; '; `
: | ;.. :` `
: `;. ```. .-; | '
'. ` ``.., .' :' '
; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' On Tuesday, June 29, 2021 at 1:55:32 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Stooge" > fails at math and science:

` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` `. ````'''''' ' '
` . ' '
/ ` `. ' ' .
/ ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
/ .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
/ .'' ; ` .' `
...'.' ; .' ` .' `
"" .' .' | ` .; \ `
; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
:' | ' ` , `. `
| ' ` ' `. `
` ' ` ; `. |
`.' ` ; `-'
`...'

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Jul 9, 2021, 1:32:57 PM7/9/21

to

Recent Publications Science Learned Journals-- NATURE 17-19, AASS SCIENCE, NEW SCIENTIST, SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, Princeton Univ Press, UCLA & Oxford student newspaper "Pandemic causing toilet paper be like sandpaper" by team antiscientists, bwr-fml, ..

Archimedes Plutonium
Jul 2, 2021, 10:02 AM
to sci.math, sci.physics

Recent Publications Science Learned Journals-- NATURE 17-19, AASS SCIENCE, NEW SCIENTIST, SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, Princeton Univ Press, "Pandemic causing toilet paper be like sandpaper" by team antiscientists, Alan Mackenzie, bwr-fml, Chris Thomasson, Dan Christensen, Earle Jones, Jan Burse, kibo Parry M, Mostowski Collapse, Ross, et al

Pandemic Causing Toilet Paper be like Sandpaper

Abstract: Notice a rash feeling as the arse cheeks rubb together? Peer through your legs bent forward in bathroom while placing a mirror near butt. The redness measures are 15cm, by 7.5cm in crack of arse (Uncle Al, 1996, NATURE, "Weaned hand to mouth spoon-fed"). One of our Colleagues in Boston, Kibo Parry noticed throughout 2020 of shitting 8 times a day with runs to the bathroom of Diaherra of Mouth, (foaming mouth syndrome) and using toilet paper 3 times the amount of 2019, that he developed the Dan Christensen "red arse".

Text: Bwr-fml conjecture that since the toilet paper industry is under enormous pressure to keep store shelves full of paper, that shortcuts were made in manufacturing with having sandpaper quality restrictions lifted.

To test this hypothesis in February-March, Mostowski Collapse, stopped using toilet paper altogether and washed the Asian method of water alone (careful to use just one hand). And to Mostowski, Mackenzie the dummy control group, to their surprise, the arse rash healed in 1.5 months time.

While Earle Jones and Chris Thomasson went and collected samples of toilet paper and ran them through Stanford Univ mass spectrometer, since no-one had used any of the machines at Stanford since AP told them the real electron of atoms was the muon, not the 0.5MeV particle. And Earle and Chris found that toilet paper since the pandemic contained alarming amounts of plastics, recycled plastics of water bottles, which in the Stanford electron microscope (henceforth renamed Dirac monopole microscope-- Scientific American -- AP King of Science dominating all the sciences, May, 2021)[1,2,3].

Ross and Jan Burse, test studied to see if microplastics can cut the fine structure of the glutis maxima, skin layer, as abrasives on the Roh scale of 21-901, (Sept 5, 2015, Nature). Study due to be completed and reported in the Google Search list of Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Thomas Hales, 5 million hits all sugar coated and no Counterpoint. Under the title "Baby Boy Genius, Wiles & Tao, proves plastic is abrasive and Fermat's Last Theorem.

Follow up studies due out by Princeton Univ Press, when they get time off from securing all Google Search hits of Wiles, Tao, Hales are propaganda with never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus [ see AP's 2015 proof of FTC] and [King of Science, comedy]

Master in Dr. Who: Ha, ha,.... ha,,,... ha,,,, ha, ha,,,,,, hahaha

Archimedes Plutonium
Jul 3, 2021, 12:27 AM
to sci.math, sci.physics
1>Recent Publications Science Learned Journals-- NATURE 17-19, AASS SCIENCE, NEW SCIENTIST, SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, Princeton Univ Press, "Pandemic causing toilet paper be like sandpaper" by team antiscientists, Alan Mackenzie, bwr-fml, Chris Thomasson, Dan Christensen, Earle Jones, Jan Burse, kibo Parry M, Mostowski Collapse, Ross, et al
>
1> Pandemic Causing Toilet Paper be like Sandpaper
>
1> Abstract: Notice a rash feeling as the arse cheeks rubb together? Peer through your legs bent forward in bathroom while placing a mirror near butt. The redness measures are 15cm, by 7.5cm in crack of arse (Uncle Al, 1996, NATURE, "Weaned hand to mouth spoon-fed"). One of our Colleagues in Boston, Kibo Parry noticed throughout 2020 of shitting 8 times a day with runs to the bathroom of Diaherra of Mouth, (foaming mouth syndrome) and using toilet paper 3 times the amount of 2019, that he developed the Dan Christensen "red arse".
>
1> Text: Bwr-fml conjecture that since the toilet paper industry is under enormous pressure to keep store shelves full of paper, that shortcuts were made in manufacturing with having sandpaper quality restrictions lifted.
>

Questions for Dr. Bwr: how long does it take to wipe your arse the Asian method instead of dry toilet paper?

On Friday, July 2, 2021 at 2:20:54 PM UTC-5, bwr fml wrote:
> We can each imagine,
> But from long observation I tend to agree with you.
>

AP: you mean you observed arse wiping by others? I bet that was a bit embarrassing.

> There was a paper a year or two ago that found if subjects spend their
> time imagining how great the outcome of a project is that they have
> far less motivation to actually do the project,

AP: we know the outcome -- wash the arse with pouring water instead of wiping with dry sandpaper toilet paper. Especially that manufactured in covid times as being extra sandpaperish.

>they have already
> wallowed in their success and smeared it all over themselves and have
> less reason to spend the effort to actually do it.

AP: you mean Kibo Parry M. and Dan Christensen wallow in the water?

> Those who don't spend time imagining their success have a much
> greater likelihood of actually completing the work to get the outcome.
>

AP: yes, Bwr, is there a time-saving involved, for just two passes of water from a washcloth and the rubbing of one hand in the arse crack takes less than 1 minute, while I have seen and spent as much as 5 minutes with dry paper wipe.

>to actually select a project, write up the method,
> get credible people to seriously read that and help make it right,
> buy the instruments and equipment, get credible people to
> observe the experiment, all those are a huge hurtle that I doubt

AP: I disagree, most everyone wipes his/her arse every day.

Archimedes Plutonium
Jul 3, 2021, 3:27 PM
to sci.math, sci.physics

2> Recent Publications Science Learned Journals-- NATURE 17-19, AASS SCIENCE, NEW SCIENTIST, SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, Princeton Univ Press, "Pandemic causing toilet paper be like sandpaper" by team antiscientists, Alan Mackenzie, bwr-fml, Chris Thomasson, Dan Christensen, Earle Jones, Jan Burse, kibo Parry M, Mostowski Collapse, Ross, et al
>
2> Pandemic Causing Toilet Paper be like Sandpaper
>
2> Abstract: Notice a rash feeling as the arse cheeks rubb together? Peer through your legs bent forward in bathroom while placing a mirror near butt. The redness measures are 15cm, by 7.5cm in crack of arse (Uncle Al, 1996, NATURE, "Weaned hand to mouth spoon-fed"). One of our Colleagues in Boston, Kibo Parry noticed throughout 2020 of shitting 8 times a day with runs to the bathroom of Diaherra of Mouth, (foaming mouth syndrome) and using toilet paper 3 times the amount of 2019, that he developed the Dan Christensen "red arse".
>
2> Text: Bwr-fml conjecture that since the toilet paper industry is under enormous pressure to keep store shelves full of paper, that shortcuts were made in manufacturing with having sandpaper quality restrictions lifted.
>
2> To test this hypothesis in February-March, Mostowski Collapse, stopped using toilet paper altogether and washed the Asian method of water alone (careful to use just one hand). And to Mostowski, Mackenzie the dummy control group, to their surprise, the arse rash healed in 1.5 months time.
>

Question by the Master of Dr. Who series: ha, ha, ha, ha. Jan Burse, how many trees do we save each year if everyone went to Asian-style-wipe-their-arse, that is, water only.

Jan Burse under his infantile pseudo-name (and he wonders why no-one likes the peckerhead)
Mostowski Collapse wrote:

Jun 28, 2021, 2:47:12 PM
to sci.math
> Breaking News: The infinite sum of Fibonacci Numbers is -1
> Just observe:
>
> 1 + z + 2z2 + 3z3 + 5z4 + ... = 1/(1-(z+z2))
>
> Now set z=1:
>
> 1 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 5 + .. = -1
>
> Q.E.D.

Master of Dr. Who: so your saying we save no trees but lose 1 more, than if we cut trees to make toilet paper.

Archimedes Plutonium
Jul 9, 2021, 1:21 AM
to sci.math

On Saturday, July 3, 2021 at 3:27:25 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> 2> Recent Publications Science Learned Journals-- NATURE 17-19, AASS SCIENCE, NEW SCIENTIST, SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, Princeton Univ Press, "Pandemic causing toilet paper be like sandpaper" by team antiscientists, Alan Mackenzie, bwr-fml, Chris Thomasson, Dan Christensen, Earle Jones, Jan Burse, kibo Parry M, Mostowski Collapse, Ross, et al
> >
> 2> Pandemic Causing Toilet Paper be like Sandpaper
> >
> 2> Abstract: Notice a rash feeling as the arse cheeks rubb together? Peer through your legs bent forward in bathroom while placing a mirror near butt. The redness measures are 15cm, by 7.5cm in crack of arse (Uncle Al, 1996, NATURE, "Weaned hand to mouth spoon-fed"). One of our Colleagues in Boston, Kibo Parry noticed throughout 2020 of shitting 8 times a day with runs to the bathroom of Diaherra of Mouth, (foaming mouth syndrome) and using toilet paper 3 times the amount of 2019, that he developed the Dan Christensen "red arse".
> >

--3-- Demonstration.

Master in Dr. Who: can we get you to demonstrate the Asian method of wiping your arse, Kibo Parry M, Dan Christensen?

Kibo Parry M: sure, Earle Jones come let us demonstrate for Twitter, Facebook.

Master in Dr. Who: ha,,, ha ha ha ha, can you write it on the blackboard as you explain it Kibo.
On Thursday, July 8, 2021 at 8:24:38 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
"Splatter-Fart-Shittee"
> tarded:

Earle take a facecloth in your right hand, and bend over, in the bathtub with another bucket to catch the water. Now Earle, get the cloth soaking wet and place at the crack of your arse as to let some water dribble through the crack of your arse bent over and where the 3 gallon bucket will catch the dribbled water with feces. And with your left hand, Earle, rub up and down in your arse cheeks for any remaining feces stuck between your arse hairs and at the orifice of your anus. Should be about 3 wash clothes of water for the entire arse to be clean, far better of a job than the dry toilet paper that is more of a sandpaper.

__
.-' `-. ,dP""Yb,
.' `. ,d" "b,
/ \ d' _ `Y,
; ; 8 8 `b
,'" ^ "`. | | `b,_,aP P
/ \ ; ; """" d'
| | \ / ,P"
\ / `. .' a,.__,aP"
`.___ .' `-._____.-' `"""''
@ @
/ \
| o o |
-U|--U--|U--

On Monday, October 21, 2019 at 1:29:49 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> Are you ready, kids??? Bend over, er...

Master of Dr. Who: waah haha haha ha, so you need no toilet paper at all.

Kibo Parry M.: well, no, you can use a few sheets to mop up any water on your legs, but most importantly, never in the crack of your arse to inflame the sensitive skin. I use about 1 roll of toilet paper for 2 months time. Or, just a towel and no toilet paper. (Nature, Sep4, 1984)

Earle Jones who claims to be a Stanford alumni wrote:
Nov 18, 2020, 6:32:00 PM
>There is an opening for a potwasher at Hanover House on the Dartmouth campus. They are looking for someone with experience.

The Master in Dr. Who tv series: ha,ha,,ha,,ha, and will you take the job Earle?

Kibo Parry M.: One more item of research that our team completed was that we can save 88% of all tree forests because toilet paper is the main factor of trees sawed down. Our calculations after much midnight oil was this.

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass

> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short. (New Scientist, 84-93, pp8-9)

The Master in Dr. Who: haha,,hahaha,,, ha, so you subtracted 12% from 100% to arrive at 88%. Ha,ha,,ha,haha.

\\\^^^^^///
= 0 0 =
-o00--( )--00o--

Kibo Research Jet Propulsion Lab, California

Message has been deleted

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Jul 9, 2021, 2:39:18 PM7/9/21

to

Kibo Parry M on why Queen's Univ is a math & science failed school.
Re: 135,566 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron o
#2-1, 137th published book Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series,
May 10, 2021
by Michael Moroney

Question Kibo Parry M. is it because of confessions like Dan Christensen that they fail in math and science?

On Monday, October 21, 2019 at 1:29:49 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
>
> Are you ready, kids??? Bend over, er...
>

> Dan

Message has been deleted

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Jul 10, 2021, 7:05:26 PM7/10/21

to

Kibo Parry M, is Steven Weinberg any worse than your 938 is 12% short of 945?
On Saturday, July 10, 2021 at 4:52:04 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> megatard
>"little fish"
> The letters in
> rearranged, spell "I pound his
> male rectum".

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Jul 12, 2021, 9:02:17 PM7/12/21

to

Dr. Panchanathan of National Science Foundation, how much do you pay the 28 year long stalker Kibo Parry M.-- I hope it is 0 dollars. For he even fails percentages with his 938 is 12% short of 945. Or is that what NSF wants taught in classrooms of today.

On Monday, July 12, 2021 at 5:16:17 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "Court Jester of Physics"

> fails at math and science:

> Was NSF Dr. Panchanathan the architect and designer of bully stalking, paid for by NSF to the likes of kibo Parry M. and world std, paid more to stalk than teachers in classrooms paid to teach math and physics? I am asking, not indicting.

Samples of the mindless Kibo Parry M. who should never be allowed to post to either sci.math or sci.physics due to his failings.

Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block, Ernest Abers, Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and 0.5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
by Michael Moroney Mar 3, 2019, 6:38:18 PM

Re: 135,566 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron o

May 10, 2021
by Michael Moroney

Re: 6Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
By Michael Moroney 28 posts 292 views updated 12:31 PM

Re: L. Reif, Marty Walsh, Charlie Baker, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins-- Moroney-- Boston's antiscience stalker fool//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
By Michael Moroney 19 posts 120 views updated 12:28 PM

Re: If Marissa Mayer were still at Google-- probably take her 15 minutes to engineer a better newsgroup
By Michael Moroney 20 posts 156 views updated 12:26 PM

Re: 8Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
By Michael Moroney 29 posts 422 views updated 12:25 PM

Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block,Ernest Abers,Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
By Michael Moroney 34 posts 244 views updated 12:23 PM

Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work
By Michael Moroney 20 posts 165 views updated 12:22 PM

Re: Racist-math at Reed College-- ellipse is never a conic, David Perkinson, Lyudmila Korobenko, John Lind, Dylan McNamee, Kyle Ormsby, Angelica Osorno
By Michael Moroney 50 posts 405 views updated 12:21 PM

Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
By Michael Moroney 44 posts 461 views updated 12:17 PM

Message has been deleted

Quantum Bubbles

unread,

Jul 13, 2021, 2:35:56 PM7/13/21

to

On Tuesday, July 13, 2021 at 3:31:55 PM UTC+1, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

[snip - because the internet has suffered enough]

Response to AP,

Without intending to sound nasty, it does strike me as rather tragic that you waste so much of both your time and effort (and other people's) writing your pseudo-mathematical and pseudo-scientific drivel on here when you don't have much time left on the clock. You are in your 70's aren't you? Average life expectancy in wealthier parts of Europe is about 80, and obviously health runs the risk of seriously declining beyond 70 unless you have taken amazing care of yourself. So barring Aubrey de Grey's efforts succeeding at a speed beyond his expectations (at present), you've probably got less than a decade. If you are actually interested in mathematics and physics, wouldn't you be better off actually trying to learn some genuine number theory and physics rather than just writing down whatever occurs to you?

A nice book is Hardy and Wright's text: An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers

The latest edition has an introduction by Wiles himself.

Geniuses like Wiles should be looked up to and imitated so that what worked for them can help the community at large and so aid humanities quest for truth. Being jealous and scornful of them accomplishes nothing at all, but wastes a lot of time that could be better spent.

Some Number Theory Book Recommendations

1) An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers, By G.H. Hardy and E.M. Wright. This book gives a highly respected overview of the field, starting from reasonably basic level, and is highly respected by the mathematical community. It is a reference book rather than a text book though and covers some quite hard material. So its a companion text rather than anything else.

The four books below give different approaches to elementary number theory or look at different topics.

2) Higher Arithmetic: an algorithmic introduction to number theory, by Harold Edwards. Perhaps the simplest introduction to number theory that I have come across, and one of the shortest. Edwards favours an old fashioned constructivist approach to mathematics, so you won't find set theory and hard analysis in here, its all elementary and written in an almost 19th century spirit at times.

3) Number Theory, by George Andrews. Takes a combinatorial approach to number theory. Starts off at same level as Edwards, but utilises some ideas from calculus later on. Doesn't seem to assume any background in abstract algebra though.

4) Elementary Number Theory, by Jones and Jones. A standard first text in the UK. Has solutions for most exercises and is more modern in its treatment than the Edwards or Andrews two texts, but still requires little in the way of pre-requisites for most chapters, however it enters more abstract territory than the other two texts.

5) The Higher Arithmetic, by Davenport. More of a monograph than a proper textbook, but is aimed at a beginning level and is reasonably short. Includes an extended discussion of continued fractions which the previous three texts don't really go into.

For physics, before tackling quantum theory, its best to have a solid grounding in classical physics. A respectable for self-teaching, would be:

- Understanding Physics, by Mansfield and O'Sullivan.

You would do yourself a service by cutting your losses on the constant, boring and repetitive posting (do you really think google or the mathematics community gives a damn about your unlettered views on physics 'Kibo'?), and instead having a crack at absorbing these texts.

Have a Wonderful Day
QB

Remain Calm and Keep Loving Real Analysis
[Recommended Book of the Day: Dr Euler's Fabulous Formula, by Paul Nahin]

Message has been deleted

Earle Jones

unread,

Jul 19, 2021, 12:28:34 AM7/19/21

to

QB:

Those are excellent recommendations for reading. Unfortunately, our friend, Archie (AP) does not read and does not learn.

I appreciate your encouragement for him -- at his age -- to begin to learn what many professionals before him have given us. But I have no hope that he will follow your good judgment. I have "known" him too long to have any hope that he can learn and join the league of true mathematicians with his tremendous and far-reaching innovation ability. He could, with any discipline, make some new discoveries -- some new findings -- but without the discipline of a good education, it is sadly, not likely.

Archie: There is hope for you -- with your tremendous ability to innovate, you can, with a reasonable and disciplined background, make new findings in mathematics and physics. Can you do it? I sure hope so.

earle
*

Message has been deleted

Mostowski Collapse

unread,

Jul 21, 2021, 11:57:28 AM7/21/21

to

Archimedes Plutonium schrieb:
>> I cannot decide which wheelchair. Help!
>>
>> This one:
>>
>> |__
>> |__|
>> * *
>>
>> Or this one:
>>
>> |__
>> |__|
>> o o

Michael Moroney schrieb:

Message has been deleted

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Jul 22, 2021, 2:57:06 PM7/22/21

to

sci.physics and sci.math are dead newsgroups, because of stalkers --Kibo Parry M, Dan Christensen, Jan Burse, paid for by governments to stalk. There is no discussion going on of science in either sci.math, sci.physics, just one long parade of ad hominem. And the USA govt of NSF feels that is the best way to have a sci.math and a sci.physics-- paid for stalkers.

---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993

Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua

Put up a post and seconds later Kibo Parry responds with on splatter-fart-shittee.

Sci.physics and sci.math are dead science newsgroup because NSF Dr. Panchanathan pays for paid stalkers like Kibo Parry. More people read AP's newsgroup than sci.physics.

On Tuesday, July 13, 2021 at 9:12:58 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "Splatter-Fart-Shittee"

y z
| /
| /
|/______ x

More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.

In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.

There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium

148th published book

Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface:
Physics book that explains what the universe is, and how it works. This is a continuation of the Atomic Theory by Democritus in Ancient Greek times. It adds one more fact to the Atomic Theory picture. That the Universe itself is one gigantic big atom. The picture is that the Universe, in total is one big atom that contains more atoms, inside itself. It completes the logic of science that Dr. Feynman wrote-- all things are made up of atoms -- and so, to complete that idea -- all things and the universe itself is an atom.

In this edition of year 2021, AP actually proves the Atom Totality theory, and therefore, a simultaneously _disproof_ of the Big Bang theory. The proof is simple, in that Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but rather, instead, shine from the Faraday law going on inside each and every proton in the Universe. The muon is the true electron of atoms and is the bar magnet in Faraday's law while the proton is a 840MeV particle in the geometry shape of 8 ring coil torus that is the closed loop coil in Faraday's Law. NASA scientists have discovered the Sun is a yearly increase in radiation of 0.005% yearly, and is why 25% of all insects have perished in the last decade 2010-2020. Stars and Sun shine from Faraday law, not from fusion and that is how the Universe itself grows. So, we cannot logically have two different mechanisms for the creation of the Universe. We cannot have electricity magnetism of Faraday law and then some silly "explosion of Big Bang" to create and grow the universe.

Also, in the course of providing supporting evidence of the Atom Totality theory, my research had to revise and correct the entire Maxwell Equations, and revise and correct the theory, the quantum electrodynamics theory.

Cover Picture: Again I used 8 rings from plumbing hardware to represent the 8 rings of a proton torus ring and visualize each ring as a dot cloud pattern instead of a continuous ring, and the holes in some of those rings helps facilitate that image. Notice the muon ring is inside the proton torus perpendicular at the equator, going around and around the proton torus at nearly the speed of light in the Faraday law, producing electricity.

Length: 316 pages

Product details
• ASIN : B08T82M2LP
• Publication date : January 16, 2021
• Language: : English
• File size : 887 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 316 pages
• Lending : Enabled

#1-2, 48th published book

Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, Atom Totality Series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

--------------------------
Table of Contents
--------------------------

1) A visual image of a Atom Totality

2) Simply multiply 9 times 105MeV and there you get the rest mass of proton and neutron.

3) The tau-electron 1777MeV is merely 105MeV multiply by 17 is 1785 with Sigma Error of 0.4%.

4) Particle in the 840MeV range so that we can say we discovered the proton particle isolated of its internal muon.

5) Found a 840MeV particle in experimental physics, but, is it the proton torus without its interior occupied by a muon?

6) The theory of 9s, as help in physics.

7) How we picture the interior of Atoms, and the Atom Totality.

8) The Principle of Scooting-Over, applied.

9) An ongoing commentary of the geometry of atoms, both interior and exterior.

10) Galaxies form Rings in Faraday Coil, and Faraday bar-magnet // Cosmic Proton, Cosmic Muon.

11) Is there a Cosmic Faraday Law going on?
Length: 148 pages

Product details
File Size: 2370 KB
Print Length: 148 pages
Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
Publication Date: June 10, 2019

Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English

ASIN: B07SW87BF5

Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray:  Not Enabled  
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #285,417 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#826 in Astronomy (Books)
#166 in Astronomy (Kindle Store)
#671 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#1-3, 74th published book

HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.

Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
Length: 17 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : December 18, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 17 pages
• File Size : 698 KB
• ASIN : B082WYGVNG
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled

#1-4, 105th published book

Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.

Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
Length: 39 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : March 24, 2020
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• ASIN : B086BGSNXN
• Print Length : 39 pages
• File Size : 935 KB
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
#315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
#4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
 

#1-5, 112th published book

New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5

Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.

Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
Length: 20 pages

Product details
• ASIN : B0875SVDC7
• Publication date : April 15, 2020
• Language: : English
• File size : 1134 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 20 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#1-6, 135th published book

QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)  
Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.

Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.

Product details
• ASIN : B08K47K5BB
• Publication date : September 25, 2020
• Language : English
• File size : 587 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Print length : 25 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #334 in General Chemistry

#1-7, 138th published book
The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
Length: 41 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : October 9, 2020
• File Size : 828 KB
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print Length : 41 pages
• ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled

#1-8, 1st published book

Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.

Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.

Foreward:
I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
Length: 632 pages

Product details
File Size: 1132 KB
Print Length: 632 pages
Publication Date: March 11, 2019

Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English

ASIN: B07PLP9NDR

Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray:  Not Enabled  
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
                #1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
                #8526 in Physics (Books)
                #18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)

#2-1, 137th published book

Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

#1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory

This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.

Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.

Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
Length: 64 pages

Product details
• File Size : 790 KB
• Publication Date : October 5, 2020
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 64 pages
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Language: : English
• ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

#2-2, 145th published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2

Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.

Product details
• ASIN : B08PC99JJB
• Publication date : November 29, 2020
• Language: : English
• File size : 682 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 78 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)

#2-3, 146th published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3

Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Books in this series are.
Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS High School junior year, book 2
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS High School senior year, book 3
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS 1st year college, book 4
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS Sophomore college, book 5
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS Junior college, book 6
TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS Senior college, book 7

Preface: I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook.

Product details
• ASIN : B08RK33T8V
• Publication date : December 28, 2020
• Language: : English
• File size : 917 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 114 pages
• Lending : Enabled

#3-1, 2nd published book

True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.

Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.

Length: 1150 pages

Product details
• File Size : 2167 KB
• ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
• Publication Date : March 11, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 1150 pages
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#181 in General Chemistry & Reference
#1324 in General Chemistry
#1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)

Message has been deleted

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Jul 24, 2021, 3:16:13 AM7/24/21

to

Stalker Kibo Parry failed Rensselaer 938 is 12% short of 945 but learned swearing at NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Ulvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey.

AP writes: Did Dr. Panchanathan give you an A, and a pay raise in stalking for 2021?

On Saturday, July 24, 2021 at 1:54:33 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Drag Queen of Science"
> tarded:

Stalker Kibo subhuman, Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Ulvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley, are you paying Kibo to stalk sci.math, sci.physics??? The Wikipedia quote below indicates you are paying him to stalk.

On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 11:12:06 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"subhuman"
On Friday, July 9, 2021 at 10:01:43 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Splitter-Splatter-Fart-Shittee"
On Sunday, July 18, 2021 at 6:16:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"AnalButtfuckManure"

On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 10:25:22 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> fails at math and science:

If indeed, NSF Dr. Panchanathan hired the stalker Kibo Parry Moroney going back to 1993 and thereabouts, was a huge mistake, for Usenet is self policing. The govt hiring a paid stalker eventually turns to ruin, for although a nitwit like Kibo Parry can tell a crank and moron. The nitwit Kibo Parry cannot tell a genuine scientist doing science outside the box. So in this sense, Dr. Panchanathan should resign from the NSF.

Sethuraman Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Ulvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley, are you paying Kibo to stalk sci.math, sci.physics???

Is NSF Dr. Panchanathan paying Kibo Parry M more money to stalk sci.math, sci.physics, than the top 5 officials at NSF combined and 5X the amount of pay of MIT professors who teach calculus in classrooms. Same question for Canada's stalker, how much pay from government for his bully tactics

Does NSF pay kibo Parry to stalk more than the combined salaries of Sethuraman Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Ulvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley.

Kibo Parry M on Philip J. Hanlon Dartmouth College president
On Saturday, July 17, 2021 at 4:05:34 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 🐜 of Math and 🐛 of

> fails at math and science:

Kibo, is it because he can never do a geometry proof of calculus, nor can Dr. Panchanathan of National Science Foundation, NSF who possibly is paying kibo more money to stalk for 28 years than what Dartmouth pays professors to actually teach calculus in classrooms.

..
.- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
, . `.' ' `.
.' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
. ; .' . `. ;
; . ' `. . '
. ' ` `. |
. '. '
. 0 0 ' `.
' `
; `
.' `
; U `
; '; `
: | ;.. :` `
: `;. ```. .-; | '
'. ` ``.., .' :' '

; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' I am Kibo Parry Moroney, the grand failure of science with my 938 is 12% short of 945, and my ellipse is a conic when it never was, and my idiocy of thinking geothermal is not radioactivity but is recycled solar fossil. I stalk on Internet because NSF pays a million dollars and is 5 times the salary of those professors stuck with actually teaching science and all I do is attack dog style in sci.math, sci.physics. And Barry Shein loves to whisper in my ear how 10 OR 2 =12 with AND as subtraction

` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` `. ````'''''' ' '
` . ' '
/ ` `. ' ' .
/ ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
/ .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
/ .'' ; ` .' `
...'.' ; .' ` .' `
"" .' .' | ` .; \ `
; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
:' | ' ` , `. `
| ' ` ' `. `
` ' ` ; `. |
`.' ` ; `-'
`...'

---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993

Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 19May2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Length: 137 pages

Product details
ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
Publication date : March 14, 2019
Language : English
File size : 1307 KB

Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Not Enabled

Print length : 137 pages
Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
On Saturday, July 17, 2021 at 11:20:58 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Dr. Panchanathan's NSF govt spammer Kibo Parry M on why Weinberg, Glashow, Higgs fail physics with their never asking the question which is the atom's true real electron? Is it the muon, stuck inside a proton torus of 840MeV doing the Faraday law and 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole?

> On Saturday, July 17, 2021 at 8:36:13 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > fails at math and science:

y z
| /
| /
|/______ x

More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.

In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.

There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium

In the 1990s Univ Waterloo (correct me if wrong) hosted the archives of Usenet sci.math, sci.physics. And almost daily they posted a FAQ. In the FAQ was a broad warning to students that all manner of posts are in sci.math and sci.physics and that you should examine each post with a "grain of salt" or be highly speculative of what you read. Then around 1993, started this Stalking program of jerks being paid by governments to perpetually stalk posters. Then by end of 1990s, you never saw the FAQ, never saw the warnings. But all that remained was hyperactive goon clod paid stalkers.

It was a bad choice to make, to stop the FAQ and replace it with paid goon-squad stalkers like Kibo Parry Moroney or Dan Christensen and their allies. Bad choice because everyone can recognize cranks and crackpots, but hardly anyone can recognize people who think outside of the box.

How much is Dr. Panchanathan responsible for the 28 year long nonstop goon stalker Kibo Parry Moroney? Perhaps 0%, perhaps 50% perhaps 100%. And this is probably the reason the Wikipedia quote says-- > Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
> --- end quote ---

I remember the 1990s and many a professor and educator bulking at this idea of paying stalkers like Kibo Parry or like Dan Christensen, some saying that if students cannot recognize cranks and crackpots they never belonged in science in the first place.

So, what worked well was the idea of a Daily FAQ doing the warning, a daily FAQ warning newcomers and students that much of what they read here is full of error. But not the crazy idea of paid for stalkers, because, as I said, a stalker cannot identify a real scientist who is thinking outside the box.

And one of the great reasons Usenet is mostly dead-- is because it is crisscrossed by mindless stalkers being paid handsomely for their banal stalking posts.

So, well, if you want to constantly stalk AP, then you can anticipate a constant reply of above.

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Jul 24, 2021, 1:53:02 PM7/24/21

to

Solution for 28yr stalker Kibo Parry M, cut the licensing of std World ISP//Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Subscribe
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
unread,
12:51 PM (now)



to

Solution for 28yr stalker Kibo Parry M, cut the licensing of std World ISP//Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually

---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993

Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua

Mostowski Collapse
4:59 AM (8 hours ago)



to
Why so restrictive? You are starting to restrict academic freedom, by
judging other peoples ventured as foolish. What about your own

Alzheimer venture of 30 years not a single line of math.
You are a fucking nazi, with your facist hate posts.

Mostowski Collapse's profile photo
Mostowski Collapse
unread,
5:19 AM (7 hours ago)



to
Whats the immigration story behind the name Ludwig Plutonium.
Were his parents Auschwitz personell that slipped the Nurnberg trials.

Was archimedes plutonium born in a concentration camp?
All he can do is fabricate literate pests, like here:

Plutonium Totality Discredits Supercollider, Montgomery Fellow
https://www.thedartmouth.com/article/1994/05/plutonium-totality-discredits-supercollider-montgomery-fellow

Just pile of nazi gobbledygook thats isn't funny.
Only sad and disgusting. Nothing has changed since.

Mostowski Collapse's profile photo
Mostowski Collapse
unread,
5:29 AM (7 hours ago)



to
Archimedes Plutonium should be thrown in jail
for his willful criminal behavior. The criminal
Archimedes Plutonium all the times posts people
name lists together with hate speach about these people.

It is highly likely Archimedes Plutonium is
psycho. Archimedes Plutonium belongs in prison not
on usenet for his mind is complete hate hate hate.
Put the creep in jail and throw away the keys.


Michael Moroney's profile photo
Michael Moroney
unread,

9:57 AM (3 hours ago)



to
Look at this autistic meltdown by poor Arky. He's still upset over being
25 years too late for the FLT solution party and it being plain that
Wiles' proof is widely accepted. He goes on a nice long rant lashing
out with ad hominem after ad hominem against mathematicians. No actual
math, of course, just attack after attack.

It didn't help that I pointed out his attack on the Dandelin Spheres
ellipse proof was a typical "assume the conclusion" fallacy.

> math professors have descended into a Twilight Zone of memorized insanity.
>
> we have the same "realization of math in the weeds of the twilight zone of craziness"
>
> Then Puff the Magic Dragon on pink eyes white scales, fire breathing, helmet or no helmet.
>
> Then Bigfoot with conductor

> Loch Ness

> Puff the Magic Dragon and Loch Nessy.
>
> newform is duke, duke, duke, duke of Earl.
>
> jerks of mathematics

> they run on insane crazy ideas of dressing up elliptic curves that reach into cloud 9 stratosphere of goofball crazy,
>
> a asylum crazyhouse at the blackboard.
>
> how pathetically stupid it all was
>
> This is as mindless
>
> goonclod of the past math history
>
> Dull Stupid Mindless Lacking in Logic math professors

> their mindless trek into the twilight zone of math.
>
> these clowns and bozos will carve a path into the twilight zone of mathematics.
>
> the fools that were desperate

> those fools could not think logically

An easy solution, USA govt, eliminate the license of std World isp.

Message has been deleted

Mostowski Collapse

unread,

Jul 27, 2021, 1:20:28 PM7/27/21

to

Soon google will show Archimedes Plutonium top
first when searching the keyword Stalker.

LMAO!

What a looser.

Archimedes Plutonium schrieb am Dienstag, 27. Juli 2021 um 19:18:12 UTC+2:
> I have 💩 for 🧠

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Jul 28, 2021, 4:57:29 PM7/28/21

to

129th book of AP// Usenet destroyed due to paid for stalkers and police drag net spam.

What destroyed sci.math & sci.physics-- a combination of police drag net spam but also paid for stalkers

Archimedes Plutonium
Jul 28, 2021, 3:33 PM
to sci.math, sci.physics, plutonium-atom-universe

I distinctly remember police drag net spam circa 1996, and obviously the fake name of Michael Moroney was heavily stalking by 1996. So 1996 seems to be a key pivotal year, in which government bureaucrats changed the entire ecosystem of sci.math and sci.physics, for the worse. And I need to find out when exactly did the FAQ posted by I think was Univ Waterloo in Canada. When did that FAQ cease to exist? Was it also 1996? Because a FAQ that says, sci.math and sci.physics are unmoderated newsgroups would by a total liaring. For when you pay stalkers to crisscross through Usenet, you have made all of Usenet a Moderated platform, moderated down to the level of stupidity of its stalkers.

I need to add this to my 129th published book of Usenet history.

129th published book
Short History of Usenet, sci.physics, sci.math from 1993-2020, and its 90% decline// Sociology series, book 9 Kindle Edition

This book started out as a book on "stalking" but when Google revised its Google Newsgroup platform, with altogether different formatting, this book morphed into becoming a "90% demise of Usenet and sci.physics and sci.math in particular". In one of my posts on this book I said the title was going to change often until I actually write the book. And that is what happened.

Cover Picture: Is the newsgroup Plutonium-Atom-Universe that is fully controlled by the King of Science AP, Archimedes Plutonium. Every post in that newsgroup is about pure science, no ad hominem. And that is what the sci.physics and sci.math should be. Discussions on pure science, nothing else, and especially no ad hominem, no stalking, no spam, no off-topic junk, no solution manual selling, no drug selling, no police drag-net spam.

Length: 41 pages

Product details

• Publication Date : August 31, 2020
• ASIN : B08H5B71M4
• File Size : 1021 KB

• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print Length : 41 pages

• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Language: : English

• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled

What destroyed sci.math---A Stalked newsgroup is a Moderated Newsgroup. That is why the sign and post of FAQ came down in around 1996 or thereabouts for sci.math and sci.physics. The NSF and government bureaucrats sold Sci.math to stalkers. Sold in the means of paying them to actively stalk.

The FAQ stated-- sci.math is Not moderated. But when you pay stalkers of Jan Burse, Kibo Parry M, Dan Christensen and their allies Earle Jones, etc, the FAQ no longer told the truth.


What this paying stalkers does to newsgroups of sci.math and sci.physics in the case of Jan Burse, who is already belligerent, and when you give a belligerent person extra duties of "stalking", you in effect destroy the newsgroups of sci.math and sci.physics.

So when preciously did the FAQ in sci.math sci.physics come down? Was it 1996 or 1999 or 2000? Because a FAQ stating these newsgroups were free to the public as Unmoderated was a liaring. Because as you pay for Stalkers-- the newsgroup is destroyed down to the level of intelligence of those stalkers. This is why no dot edu address is seen ever again in sci.math and sci.physics.

Two newsgroups destroyed to the level of intelligence that 938 is 12% short of 945. That a ellipse is a conic when the Oval is that slant cut. And where geothermal energy is solar-fossil fuel energy, not radioactivity in the Earth's crust. Sci.math and sci.physics where no-one is able to correct any errors of Old Math and Old Physics. Errors such as Boole logic of its error filled AND truth table of TFFF when it actually is TTTF allowing for 2 AND 1 = 3. Or the error of Never a geometry proof of Calculus Fundamental Theorem. Or the huge error of JJ Thomson discovered Dirac's magnetic monopole in the 0.5MeV particle and the true electron of atoms is the muon, stuck inside a 840 MeV proton torus doing the Faraday Law.

No, worthless bombed out sci.math and sci.physics with its perpetual daily mindless stalkers of NSF paid for Jan Burse, Kibo Parry Moroney, Dan Christensen and their allies will keep sci.math and sci.physics in a bombed out shell of a husk destroyed newsgroups.

Is NSF proud of itself for destroying sci.math and sci.physics? Dr. Panchanathan, are you proud that sci.math and sci.physics are destroyed newsgroups? Maybe you, Dr. Panchanathan was a science failure along with Kibo Parry M. and Jan Burse and Dan Christensen.

AP
King of Science, especially Physics

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Aug 26, 2021, 2:41:05 PM8/26/21

to

Re: 1.1Dr. John Baez is a failed mathematician-physicist with his proton of 938MeV when it is 840MeV, electron= muon //his ellipse is a conic when it never was// as phony in math and physics as kibo Parry Moroney's ellipse and Christensen 10 OR 4 =
99 views
Subscribe
by Dan Christensen

On Sunday, September 22, 2019 at 9:54:06 AM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> WARNING TO STUDENTS: Don't be a victim
On Wednesday, June 30, 2021 at 11:02:54 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 💩 for 🧠 Stooge"
> tarded:
>irrelevant"

Finally AP with some math input into sci.math whereas Dan Christensen, Kibo Parry M. do nothing but attack 24-7-365.

On Thursday, August 26, 2021 at 12:35:53 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Sad day at UC Riverside where John Baez teaches mathematics, but what kind of math, for the fool cannot even be bothered in folding a paper cone, dropping a Kerr lid inside at slant and notice it is a Oval, never the ellipse. No, the only thing the fool Baez can do in math and science is make up attack hate lists of his opinion of cranks and crackpots. Trouble is, John is his own worse crackpot of science, and not others, yet California school system lets this cripple of mind teach math and science.
>
> Sad day at Ohio State University mathematics department, when the days of Fisher & Ziebur wrote Calculus textbook and the book I entered college first year calculus. But now Ohio State math department is just cranks and crackpots.
>
> For I suspect, do not know that if Fisher & Ziebur were at Ohio State, they would have had the brains and the _decency_ to fold up a paper cone, drop a Mason lid inside, slant at an angle and prove the Oval is the slant cut, never the ellipse. But try telling that to a crank crackpot Gerald Edgar.
>
> 3rd published book
>
> AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
>
> Length: 21 pages
>
> File Size: 1620 KB
> Print Length: 21 pages

> Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English

> ASIN: B07PLSDQWC

> Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> X-Ray: Not Enabled

> Word Wise: Not Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
>
>
> #8-2, 11th published book

> World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 19May2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
> Preface:
> Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
> Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
>
> Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
>
> Length: 137 pages
>
> Product details
> ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
> Publication date : March 14, 2019
> Language : English
> File size : 1307 KB
> Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> Screen Reader : Supported
> Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> X-Ray : Not Enabled

> Word Wise : Not Enabled

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Aug 28, 2021, 2:56:35 AM8/28/21

to

Does both Jill Pipher and Ken Ribet suffer from Dunning-Kruger disease of psychology-- where they overestimate their abilities in math-- knowing the cone has 1 axis of symmetry, yet Jill & Ken still thinks 1 axis can yield a ellipse of 2 axes of symmetry in a slant cut. I think both Jill & Ken are smarter than Kibo Parry M with his 938 is 12% short of 945, but not much smarter than Kibo Parry for both believe the slant cut in cone is a ellipse, when the truth be known, it is a Oval for the oval, like the cone has 1 axis of symmetry.

Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Aug 27, 2021, 11:07:58 AM
to sci.math

Tao fails geometry because he believes Python with his cone has 2 axes of symmetry and hence slant cut is ellipse in cone, for otherwise, he would have said something by now 2016-2021.
On Friday, August 27, 2021 at 10:35:31 AM UTC-5, Python wrote:
> Why don't you buy this kind of stuff that will show you that
> you didn't do the experiment right?
>
> https://www.pinterest.fr/pin/595178906992508262/
>
> Moreover that a slant cut in a cylinder shows an ellipse does not
> contradict that some slant cuts in a cone shows an ellipse also.

AP writes: no wonder that AP's discovery that Cone slant cut is an Oval never the ellipse is because everyone in math community other than AP thinks a cone has 2 axes of symmetry, just the same as a cylinder has 2 axis of symmetry.

I have heard of color blindness where you fail to see certain wavelengths of color, and guess that in mathematics, now, we have to test students and teachers for axis blindness.

Python wrote:
Aug 27, 2021, 11:14:47 AM
to sci.math
Ludwig Poehlmann, aka Archimedes Plutonium a écrit :
>
> Tao fails geometry because he believes Python with his cone has 2 axes of symmetry and hence slant cut is ellipse in cone

A cone has ONE axe of symmetry AND a slant cut in a cone IS an ellipse.

You can buy a wood model for a few bucks, Ludwig, instead of making a
fool of yourself.

Python wrote:
Aug 27, 2021, 11:41:04 AM
to sci.math
Ludwig Poehlmann, aka Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Friday, August 27, 2021 at 11:14:47 AM UTC-5, Python wrote:
>> Ludwig Poehlmann, aka Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>>>
>>> Tao fails geometry because he believes Python with his cone has 2 axes of symmetry and hence slant cut is ellipse in cone
>> A cone has ONE axe of symmetry AND a slant cut in a cone IS an ellipse.
>>
Python>> You can buy a wood model for a few bucks, Ludwig, instead of making a
Python>> fool of yourself.
>
AP> a ellipse has 2 axes of symmetry, so how do you get a figure with 2
AP> axes of symmetry from a cone of 1 axis of symmetry

Python>watch it there:
Python>https://www.youtube.com

AP writes: Does Terence Tao, Jill Pipher & Ken Ribet and Python (possibly Terry Tao in disguise) have Dunning-Kruger effect disability? Wikipedia describes it as "internal illusion in people of low ability". In this case mathematics, that Terry Tao has low ability in math and so misperceives the Cone as 1 axes of symmetry and then deludes himself that a 2 axes of symmetry can be gotten with a slant cut in cone to yield ellipse. Whereas AP was always a straight and narrow on cue scientist, knowing that the cone of 1 axes could never yield a ellipse of 2 axes , no, for AP that slant cut could only yield another figure of 1 axes of symmetry-- the Oval.

It has been known by AP that another clear case example of Dunning Kruger disease and mental disorder is the stalker Kibo Parry M. where he posts every day of the year almost for 28 years to sci.math when that insane koot cannot even do a percentage with his 938 is 12% short of 945.

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

And his continued stalk spam of a another posters mindless talk of some notes he took, a garbled nonsense mess--
kibo>Here is a plane and cone
x + 1 = z
and
2*x^2 + 2*y^2 = z^2
>
kibo>Square the first equation giving us
x^2 + 2*x + 1 = z^2
>
kibo>In the second equation replace z^2 with x^2 + 2*x + 1 giving us
2*x^2 + 2*y^2 = x^2 + 2*x + 1
>
kibo>Subtract x^2 + 2*x - 1 from both sides giving us
x^2 - 2*x + 1 + 2*y^2 = 2
>
kibo>Replace x^2 - 2*x + 1 with (x-1)^2 giving us
(x-1)^2 + 2*y^2 = 2
>
kibo>That is EXACTLY the equation of an ellipse
And there are two planes of symmetry.
>
kibo>No matter how you tilt or rotate an ellipse it
REMAINS an ellipse and has TWO PLANES of symmetry,
just like the intersection of a plane and cylinder
remains an ellipse no matter what the slope of the
plane is.
>

AP writes: 28 years of a shithead Kibo Parry M, unloading a wade of crap in every AP thread that AP was doing solid math and physics, such as the above, and no-one kicks the insane stalker Kibo Parry M out of sci.math and sci.physics.

AP writes: well in the opinion of AP, that Kibo Parry M has more to worry about than Dunning Kruger disease of his mental health, because in the opinion of AP, that Kibo Parry is a insane person, all stalkers are insane people and as a stalker, not even a human being, no longer a human being but melting away in insanity. For 28 years now, the insane arsewipe Kibo Parry M. has made no contribution to sci.math but to hate spew everyone he stalks. Get the straightjacket in emergency ambulance for Kibo Parry M size XXSmall.

So, well is the world being Dumbnificated by the fossil fuel burning discharging tonnes and tonnes of toxic chemicals into the air every minute of the day, and that CO2 itself comes in several isomers where the Fire-CO2, not the Animal-CO2 isomer (see my chemistry books) is especially harmful to Humans thinking abilities especially logical thinking. So that Terence Tao and Jill Pipher and Ken Ribet could no longer reason, reason that if a cone has 1 axis of symmetry, no way in hell is a slant cut into a 1 axis symmetry cone going to yield a 2 axes symmetry ellipse. No way in hell, but the cut will release a 1 axis symmetry Oval.

Message has been deleted

Michael Moroney

unread,

Aug 31, 2021, 4:22:25 PM8/31/21

to

🤡 of Math and 🃏 of Physics Archimedes "Court Jester of Math" Plutonium
<plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math:

>>> On Monday, March 12, 2018 at 10:37:45 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
>>>>> Use any aids. Answer in the space provided.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. What is the sine of 45 degrees to 3 decimal places? ____________
>>>>>
>>>>> 2. True or false: 10^604 = 0 ____________
>>>>>
>>>>> 3. If A is true and B is false, then A AND B is ____________ (true or false).
>>>>>
>>>>> 4. If A is true and B is true, then A OR B is ____________ (true or false).
>>>>>

You still left all the answers blank, StupidPlutonium! Do you *still*
need more time?

Message has been deleted

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Sep 29, 2021, 3:08:33 AM9/29/21

to

On Sunday, September 26, 2021 at 10:46:41 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Dear Infamous Crank Rectum Breath (aka John Gabriel).
> Nobody cares what you think. You are a nobody who has accomplished zero.
> You're very annoying but harmless.
> The reason others respond to you is due to the fact that interacting
> with cranks such as yourself can be quite entertaining.
> As for you, well, you've earned your title: INFAMOUS CRANK OF SCI.MATH

AP writes: other esteemed work by Rensselaer Polytech Univ of Kibo Parry M.

Re: 5) AP's 174th book// Mathopedia-- Listing of 67 fakes and mistakes of Old Math. Last revision was 8JUN2021. Under-Construction: AP recently is reinventing Multivariable Calculus, and will end up throwing out Old Math's Gradient theorem, Green's
by
Michael Moroney
Jun 17, 2021, 11:57 AM

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney stalks "AnalButtfuckManure Attacks" Dartmouth's Philip J. Hanlon, Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne with his 10 OR 6 = 16; his ellipse a conic when it never was; his proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth..
1481 views
by Professor Wordsmith Aug 14, 2020, 11:07:05 AM

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney threatening the life of AP with his incited hatred of 28 years stalking

148th published book Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1

Jun 16, 2021, 12:09 AM
by
Graham Cooper

Re: 1- Kibo Parry Moroney threatening the life of AP, with his inciting hatred of 28 years stalking leading to Violence
Mutt Buncher Re: 3- Kibo Parry Moroney says Dr. Tao, Hales, Stillwell, Wiles, educators
Jun 16, 2021
by
Efftard K. Donglemeier

Re: l) AP's 175th book//Physicsopedia-- Listing of 125 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics. New entrees under construction: AP is reinventing Multivariable Calculus so that AP throws on the trash pile the Green's theorem, Gradient theorem, Stokes
by Michael Moroney Jun 13, 2021, 4:47:35 PM

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Oct 24, 2021, 2:15:08 AM10/24/21

to

Kibo Parry M why is Rensselaer David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, CCP Stooge and "spamming shithead" as your title says?
On Sunday, October 24, 2021 at 12:36:19 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "The CCP's Stooge"

Insane Kibo Parry M leashing out at Kristin Bennett, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw and Rensselaer Polytech for failing math and science with kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945. Kibo, is it insanity that makes you fail, kibo?

On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 8:27:14 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "math hater"
On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 8:11:32 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"antiscience"

Kibo Parry M. opinion of Rensselaer Polytech where Kibo learned 938 is 12% short of 945 Re: "spamming shithead" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 8:22:09 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"physics hater"

Kibo Parry M fails math Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw as witness, and Kibo invents "analbuttfuckmanure" leashing out at Rensselaer Polytech for his science failureship of kibo Parry M.

On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 8:21:33 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> fails at math and science:

Psst, Kibo Parry you insane stalker, 938 is short of 945 by less than 1%, not your 12% short.

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

Kibo Parry M on Rensselaer failures Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
> Re: 2.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to math percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang

On Thursday, June 27, 2019 at 8:40:35 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Math Minnow

Moroney and Rensselaer Polytech Institute fail at High School Math, High School Logic// both teach Ellipse is a conic when it never was// teach 10 OR 4 = 14 when even the village idiot knows 10 AND 4=14 // never have a geometry proof of Calculus

kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin,, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic and real proton is 840MeV not 938

kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_Peter Persans, Moussa N'Gom, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938

kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938

kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938

kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938

kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_William Siegmann,Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang

Rensselaer math department
Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann

On Friday, June 7, 2019 at 12:13:14 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Physics minnow
> WARNING TO ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING STUDENTS:

> Kibo Parry M on Rensselaer failures Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
> Re: 2.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to math percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
> On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 11:34:20 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >Failure
>
>
> Is Kibo Parry M. the largest taxpayer fraud waste and abuse in Usenet history, paid $100 per stalker post by NSF and dept Educ Dr. Panchanathan??????????
>
> On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 6:15:27 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 6:24:20 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> >blithered:
> On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > "FireD your ass"
>
> snip the threats of violence kibo so many times posted
>
> AP writes: Kibo Parry M. is NSF Dr. Panchanathan and USA dept Educ going to pay you $100. for that post?? If so, then Barry Shein's World std must be a goldmine of USA taxpayer fraud waste and abuse. Just posting abusive stalker defaming spam for 28 years now. No wonder Kibo keeps defaming and stalking; many people would gladly defame and stalk at $100. a post.
>
> Re: The Gabriel Polynomial- an advanced stealing and stolen item from Archimedes Plutonium and his book//
> by Michael Moroney Sep 27, 2021, 1:16 AM
>
> Re: 1-Did Kibo-Parry-Maroney fail Rensselaer or was kicked out due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938, the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole
> by Roy Masters Sep 13, 2019, 3:24:07 PM
>
> Re: 1.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Maroney fail Rensselaer or was kicked out due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938, the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole
> by Patricio J. Whackmember Sep 13, 2019, 5:43:28 PM
>
> Re: 1.9-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Korniss,Toh-Ming Lu,Martin
> By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:57:15 AM
>
> Re: 2.0-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Michael,Newberg,N'Gom
> By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:57 AM
>
> Re: 2.1-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Persans,Schroeder,Shur
> By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:39 AM
>
> Re: 2.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to math percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
> By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:28 AM
>
> Re: A newsgroup like sci.math is a pile of shit when you have paid stalkers like Kibo Parry M. or Dan Christensen lording over sci.math as if he owns the place-- stalking and attacking posters 7-24-365. This is why I now post a roadmap to AP's newsgr
> by Alan Mackenzie Jun 29, 2021, 2:36:04 PM
>
> Re: 30) AP's 174th book// Mathopedia-- Listing of 70 fakes and mistakes of Old Math. Last revision was 28JUN2021. Preface: I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held
> by Michael Moroney Jul 3, 2021, 12:55:10 PM

>
> Re: 5) AP's 174th book// Mathopedia-- Listing of 67 fakes and mistakes of Old Math. Last revision was 8JUN2021. Under-Construction: AP recently is reinventing Multivariable Calculus, and will end up throwing out Old Math's Gradient theorem, Green's
> by
> Michael Moroney
> Jun 17, 2021, 11:57 AM
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney stalks "AnalButtfuckManure Attacks" Dartmouth's Philip J. Hanlon, Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne with his 10 OR 6 = 16; his ellipse a conic when it never was; his proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth..
> 1481 views
> by Professor Wordsmith Aug 14, 2020, 11:07:05 AM
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney threatening the life of AP with his incited hatred of 28 years stalking
> 148th published book Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1
> Jun 16, 2021, 12:09 AM
> by
> Graham Cooper
>
>
> Re: 1- Kibo Parry Moroney threatening the life of AP, with his inciting hatred of 28 years stalking leading to Violence
> Mutt Buncher Re: 3- Kibo Parry Moroney says Dr. Tao, Hales, Stillwell, Wiles, educators
> Jun 16, 2021
> by
> Efftard K. Donglemeier
>
>
> Re: l) AP's 175th book//Physicsopedia-- Listing of 125 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics. New entrees under construction: AP is reinventing Multivariable Calculus so that AP throws on the trash pile the Green's theorem, Gradient theorem, Stokes
> by Michael Moroney Jun 13, 2021, 4:47:35 PM
>

> Re: 1-Kibo Parry Moroney on failed physicist Steven Weinberg who cannot entertain the question of which is the real electron of atoms-- is it the muon or the 0.5MeV particle?
> by Mina Arvuti lähedal May 30, 2021, 7:54 AM
>
> Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block, Ernest Abers, Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and 0.5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
> by Michael Moroney Mar 3, 2019, 6:38:18 PM
>
>
> Re: 77,233 Student victims of Lawrence Bacow's Harvard from stalker Kibo Parry Moroney with his 938 is 12% short 945, his 10 OR 4 = 14 with AND as subtraction, and his mindless belief real electron = 0.5MeV when true electron is muon
> 11:57 AM 10Apr2021
> by Wayne Decarlo
>
> Re: 135,566 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron o
> May 10, 2021
> by Michael Moroney
>
> Re: 6Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
> By Michael Moroney 28 posts 292 views updated 12:31 PM
>
> Re: L. Reif, Marty Walsh, Charlie Baker, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins-- Moroney-- Boston's antiscience stalker fool//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> By Michael Moroney 19 posts 120 views updated 12:28 PM
>
> Re: If Marissa Mayer were still at Google-- probably take her 15 minutes to engineer a better newsgroup
> By Michael Moroney 20 posts 156 views updated 12:26 PM
>
> Re: 8Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
> By Michael Moroney 29 posts 422 views updated 12:25 PM
>
> Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block,Ernest Abers,Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
> By Michael Moroney 34 posts 244 views updated 12:23 PM
>
> Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work
> By Michael Moroney 20 posts 165 views updated 12:22 PM
>
> Re: Racist-math at Reed College-- ellipse is never a conic, David Perkinson, Lyudmila Korobenko, John Lind, Dylan McNamee, Kyle Ormsby, Angelica Osorno
> By Michael Moroney 50 posts 405 views updated 12:21 PM
>
> Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
> By Michael Moroney 44 posts 461 views updated 12:17 PM
>
> Re: 1Moroney barks at math failures Baez, Bullock, Witten. But I see the three as having failed Angular Momentum with their 938 proton and .5MeV electron
> 12/30/18
> by j4n bur53
>
> Re: TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS series by Archimedes Plutonium, only math books to teach correct calculus with a geometry proof of Fundamental theorem of Calculus. Old Math cannot even fix its mistake of ellipse is a cylinder section, never a conic.
> by Michael Moroney
>
> Re: 5-AP's 150th book// TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Freshperson College// Physics textbook series, book 4 by Archimedes Plutonium// Using as template Halliday& Resnick & AP's Senior year High School to AP's 150th book// TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//
> by Michael Moroney
>
> Re: Zelos asks why Harvard's Dr. Hau wants to fail in physics, by not turning off the light to see if light wave is a closed loop pencil ellipse that AP predicts. Is Dr.Hau stubborn and too ignorant to finish her experiment??
> by Michael Moroney
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney on Dr. Thorp stealing AP's dog theory connected to why he is a failure on Lewis 8 Structure because CO and N2 dissociation energy says it is Lewis 6 Structure. Yes, Kibo, what is your psychoanalysis of Dr. Thorp stealing? Is steal
> Ebenezer Splooge
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney asks Trump to give South Korea to North Korea, for who wants to protect barbarians that torture Moon Bears in cages
> by Roger Davis
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says of Dr. Tao "ant of Math" and a pandemic shit mule// Perhaps because Dr. Tao is such a failure of math, he believed primes are real when Naturals have no division-- and failures of math overlook even the most obvious
> by Professor Wordsmith Jul 25, 2020, 8:23:21 PM
>
> Re: 8-Kibo Parry Moroney says boycott Samsung & Hyundai until South Korea stops torturing to death caged Moon Bears // SOUTH KOREA, MOON BEARS Moon Bears of South Korea need the world's helping hand from evil//SCIENCE COUNCIL RULE EARTH
> by Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck Jul 28, 2020, 5:35:52 PM
>
> Re: 1- Kibo Parry Moroney says of math failure Dan Christensen Univ. Western Ontario with his ellipse a conic when it never was//And his insane Boole logic of 10 OR 2 = 12// pandemic shit mule
> by Hank Hill Jul 26, 2020, 7:26:18 PM
>
> Re: 102-Kibo Parry Moroney (Barry Shein's world std) stalking analbuttfuckmanure shithead of 27 years nonstop-- needs a emergency straightjacket size XXsmall
> By Eduardo Remington 2 posts 3 views updated 12:15 AM
>
> Re: 1-Kibo Parry Moroney, how do you clean your dick after it has been up Barry Shein's arsehole, or does it improve your stalking
> 285 views
> by Richard Cranium May 10, 2020, 8:30:43 PM

>
> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
>
>
>

> ..
> .- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
> , . `.' ' `.
> .' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
> . ; .' . `. ;
> ; . ' `. . '
> . ' ` `. |
> . '. '
> . 0 0 ' `.
> ' `
> ; `
> .' `
> ; U `
> ; '; `
> : | ;.. :` `
> : `;. ```. .-; | '
> '. ` ``.., .' :' '

> ; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' Hi, I am Kibo Parry Moroney, the grand failure of science with my 938 is 12% short of 945, and my ellipse is a conic when it never was, and my idiocy of thinking geothermal is not radioactivity but is recycled solar fossil. I stalk on Internet because NSF pays a million dollars and is 5 times the salary of those professors stuck with actually teaching science and all I do is attack dog style in sci.math, sci.physics.

> ` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
> ` ` ; ; ' '
> ` ` ; ; ' '
> ` `. ````'''''' ' '
> ` . ' '
> / ` `. ' ' .
> / ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
> / .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
> / .'' ; ` .' `
> ...'.' ; .' ` .' `
> "" .' .' | ` .; \ `
> ; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
> :' | ' ` , `. `
> | ' ` ' `. `
> ` ' ` ; `. |
> `.' ` ; `-'
> `...'
>

> IS ALL OF THE BELOW TRUE?????? Kibo Parry M. and Dan Christensen in Canada/USA
>
> NSF fraud waste abuse of taxpayer money $100 per stalker post-- Champagne,Hewitt,Crago
> On Saturday, July 31, kibo Parry M. stalked
>
> NSF fraud waste abuse of taxpayer money $100 per stalker post--
>
> USA--NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Ulvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley
>
> USA NSF---Sethuraman Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Ulvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley
>
> USA dept Educ, Cindy Marten
>
> Canada's NSF-- Francois-Philippe Champagne, Ted Hewitt, Martha Crago, Frederic Bouchard, Cinthia Duclos, Normand Labrie

>
> ---quoting Wikipedia ---
> Controversy
> Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
> --- end quote ---
>
> NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
>
> Dr. Panchanathan , present day
> France Anne Cordova
> Subra Suresh
> Arden Lee Bement Jr.
> Rita R. Colwell
> Neal Francis Lane
> John Howard Gibbons 1993
>
> Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
> Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
>
>

> MIT math dept.
>
> Michael Artin, Martin Bazant, Bonnie Berger, Roman Bezrukavnikov, Alexei Borodin, John Bush, Herman Chernoff, Henry Cohn, Laurent Demanet, Richard Dudley, Jörn Dunkel, Alan Edelman, Pavel Etingof, Daniel Freedman, Michel Goemans, Vadim Gorin, Harvey Greenspan, Victor Guillemin, Larry Guth, Sigurdur Helgason, Anette Hosoi, David Jerison, Steven Johnson, Victor Kac, Steven Kleiman, Daniel Kleitman,
> Andrew Lawrie, Tom Leighton, George Lusztig, Arthur Mattuck, Davesh Maulik, Richard Melrose, Haynes Miller, William Minicozzi, Ankur Moitra, Elchanan Mossel, Tomasz Mrowka, James Munkres, Andrei Negut, Aaron Pixton, Bjorn Poonen, Alexander Postnikov, Philippe Rigollet, Rodolfo Rosales, Giulia Saccà, Gerald Sacks, Paul Seidel, Scott Sheffield, Peter Shor, Isadore Singer, Michael Sipser, Jared Speck, Gigliola Staffilani, Richard Stanley, Harold Stark, Gilbert Strang, Daniel Stroock, Goncalo Tabuada, Alar Toomre, David Vogan
>
> Chancellor Cynthia Barnhart
> President: L. Reif (electrical engineer)
>
> MIT physics dept
> William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter, James Young



Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Oct 25, 2021, 1:29:33 AM10/25/21

to

Kibo Parry M apparently got his masters degree from Rensselaer Polytech to keep up his 28 years nonstop filthy stalking something to make Rensselaer proud of
On Wednesday, June 30, 2021 at 11:02:54 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 💩 for 🧠

Kibo Parry M on spamming Rensselaer Polytech David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann
On Sunday, October 24, 2021 at 10:31:27 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Spamming

Kibo Parry M. why cannot MIT Richard Stanley, Harold Stark, Gilbert Strang, Daniel Stroock ever do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, are they what Kibo calls "imp of math"
On Sunday, October 24, 2021 at 10:48:36 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Putin's Stooge"

Michael Moroney

unread,

Oct 25, 2021, 2:25:53 AM10/25/21

to

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Nov 3, 2021, 11:31:55 PM11/3/21

to

Rensselaer's Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, psychoceramic and little fish according to Kibo Parry M stalker
On Wednesday, November 3, 2021 at 7:06:09 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"little fish"
>"psychoceramic"

Frenchman Lacassagne 1885: "Every society has the criminals it deserves"
AP 2021: "Every University is responsible for the filthy stalker who attended that school and is now a insane nonstop stalker on Usenet"

Rensselaer's Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, cannot even ask the question of the real electron of atoms is the muon, not the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac Magnetic Monopole, not after teaching Kibo Parry M. that 938 is 12% short of 945.

On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 at 2:49:54 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Oh dear, you regress. You assume the output of a theoretical experiment
> which neither you nor Dr. Hau have ever performed*.

On Monday, June 15, 2020 at 1:13:27 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Here you are!
> Below you will find a simple *proof* that shows that certain conic
> sections are ellipses.
>
> Some preliminaries:
>
> Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
> in the proof:
>
> ^ x
> |
> -+- < xh
> .' | `.
> . | .
> | | |
> ' | '
> `. | .'
> y <----------+ < x0
> Cone (side view):
> .
> /|\
> / | \
> /b | \
> /---+---' < x h
> / |' \
> / ' | \
> / ' | \
> x 0 > '-------+-------\
> / a | \
>
> Proof:
>
> r(x) a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence
>
> y(x)^2 r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.
>
> Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 1 ...equation of an ellipse
>
> qed

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

..
.- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
, . `.' ' `.
.' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
. ; .' . `. ;
; . ' `. . '
. ' ` `. |
. '. '
. 0 0 ' `.
' `
; `
.' `
; U `
; '; `
: | ;.. :` `
: `;. ```. .-; | '
'. ` ``.., .' :' '

; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' Hi, I am Kibo Parry M. a shit streaked arsewipe of science, a complete failure of math and physics, yet I stalk these newsgroups every day of the year for the past 28 years nonstop, because I am Kibo Parry the moron of science with my fool's proof ellipse and my 938 is 12% short of 945. I was trained at Rensselaer Polytech and that is where I picked up my "moron failure in science" and since I fail math and science so horribly bad, I continue to do the only thing my little mind knows how to do--- stalk stalk stalk for degenerate losers of life do the only thing they do well-- stalk

` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` `. ````'''''' ' '
` . ' '
/ ` `. ' ' .
/ ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
/ .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
/ .'' ; ` .' `
...'.' ; .' ` .' `
"" .' .' | ` .; \ `
; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
:' | ' ` , `. `
| ' ` ' `. `
` ' ` ; `. |
`.' ` ; `-'
`...'

Frenchman Lacassagne 1885: "Every society has the criminals it deserves"
AP 2021: "Every University is responsible for the filthy stalker who attended that school and is now a insane nonstop stalker on Usenet"

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang

Rensselaer math department
Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann

74th published book

HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.

Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.

Length: 17 pages

Product details

• Publication Date : December 18, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 17 pages
• File Size : 698 KB
• ASIN : B082WYGVNG
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled

• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled

#1-4, 105th published book

Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.

Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.

Length: 39 pages

Product details

• Publication Date : March 24, 2020
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• ASIN : B086BGSNXN
• Print Length : 39 pages
• File Size : 935 KB
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
#315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
#4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
 

#1-5, 112th published book

New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5

Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.

Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
Length: 20 pages

Product details
• ASIN : B0875SVDC7
• Publication date : April 15, 2020
• Language: : English

• File size : 1134 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 20 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#1-6, 135th published book

QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)  

Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.

Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.

Product details
• ASIN : B08K47K5BB
• Publication date : September 25, 2020
• Language : English

• File size : 587 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Print length : 25 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #334 in General Chemistry

#1-7, 138th published book

The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.

Length: 41 pages

Product details

• Publication Date : October 9, 2020
• File Size : 828 KB
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print Length : 41 pages
• ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled

• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled

#1-8, 1st published book

Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.

Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.

Foreward:
I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
Length: 632 pages

Product details
File Size: 1132 KB

Print Length: 632 pages

Publication Date: March 11, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English

ASIN: B07PLP9NDR

Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray:  Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#8526 in Physics (Books)
#18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)

#2-1, 137th published book

Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

#1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory

This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.

Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.

Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
Length: 64 pages

Product details
• File Size : 790 KB
• Publication Date : October 5, 2020
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 64 pages
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Language: : English
• ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

#2-2, 145th published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2

Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.

Product details
• ASIN : B08PC99JJB
• Publication date : November 29, 2020
• Language: : English

• File size : 682 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 78 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)

#2-3, 146th published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3

Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
• Language ‏ : ‎ English

• File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB

• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)

#2-4, 151st published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4

Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.

Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.

Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1034 KB

• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 384 pages

• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#3-1, 2nd published book

True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.

Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.

Length: 1150 pages

Product details
• File Size : 2167 KB
• ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
• Publication Date : March 11, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 1150 pages
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#181 in General Chemistry & Reference
#1324 in General Chemistry
#1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)



Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Nov 5, 2021, 1:51:01 AM11/5/21

to

Berkeley a minion? Reinhard Genzel, Richard Marrus, Forrest Mozer, Richard Muller
On Friday, November 5, 2021 at 12:01:07 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "Kim Jong Un's minion"

> fails at math and science:

Gilbert Strang, Daniel Stroock, Goncalo Tabuada, Alar Toomre, David Vogan

On Sunday, October 31, 2021 at 1:03:03 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> fails at math and science:

Whodat on Richard Muller, Richard Packard neither of you has produced anything worthwhile. Why Whodat? Is it because they are too stupid to ask which is the atom's real electron-- the muon or 0.5MeV particle, or is it because they believe light is a arrow ray with head and tail, while AP says it is a closed loop ellipse.
Whodat says neither Dr.Hau nor Sylvia Else did any physics of slow light, acknowledging that they are impotent in "turning off the light" proving AP's light is not a arrow ray but a closed loop pencil ellipse
On Thursday, November 4, 2021 at 9:59:33 AM UTC-5, whodat wrote:
> Neither of you has
> produced anything worthwhile.

On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 at 5:36:42 PM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote:
> Back to your abuse approach I see.
>
> That didn't take long.
>
> Sylvia.

Sylvia, no abuse at all, the King of Science is 100% serious on science, but you seem to want to waste time on chit chat b.s. that amounts to nothing overall. Sylvia wants to perpetuate her myth, along with the obnoxious myth of Dr. Hau at Harvard that light is a arrow ray with head and tail. While AP says light waves are pencil ellipses, closed loop ellipses that when the source of light is turned off, all the light-- whether normal speed or slow speed, all the light vanishes the instant the light switch is off.

Is Sylvia and Dr. Hau just plain lazy or stupid lazy in not finishing the experiment. So I ask the Berkeley physics department are they lazy and stupid or both.

The Internet indicates a Sylvia Else is a physics graduate of Berkeley.

So then, Berkeley has to stand up to the challenge that AP throws into their court yard. I throw into your court yard that if Harvard's Dr. Hau set up her slow light experiment. And sees a column of slow light in BEC medium with entrance light at normal speed and exit light at normal speed, only the BEC cold region with slow light. Now, now Dr. Hau, now Sylvia Else, turn the source light off. And to your fascination and the fascination of the entire world, watch and see that the slow light vanishes instantly along with the normal fast light. The entire column of light vanishes simultaneously.

Why does it vanish all at once simultaneously Sylvia? Why does it vanish all at once Dr. Hau? Why does it vanish all at once Harvard Univ? Why does it vanish all at once simultaneously Berkeley UC?

It vanishes all at once because light waves are closed loop circuits around a source and no matter how fast those closed loop circuits in a region of the circuit, the moment the source is gone -- the entire light is gone.

What have we proven here Sylvia? What have we proven here Harvard's Dr. Hau. You have proven that light waves, like electricity are closed loop circuits, like a hoola hoop. And this is the reason you can have light as a constant maximum speed, yet slow light down in a region of the circuit of light.

So, Harvard's Dr. Hau, get off your lazy butt and complete your experiment, throw the switch off-- and see for yourself that light all vanishes simultaneously. And report your experiment to the world-- that light is a closed loop circuit, not what you believed all along before-- light is a single ray with head and tail. No, light was never a single ray of head of tail, like a arrow. Light is like a closed loop circuit, a pencil ellipse.

So get off your lazy butt and finish the experiment.

Or have Sylia Else in Berkeley California set up the slow light experiment and have Sylvia finish and complete the experiment.

Times a wasting, with your chit chat Sylvia, time you roll up your sleeves and burn the midnight oil.

AP, King of Science, especially Physics

> Village idiot William Frazer, Mary K. Gaillard, Martin Halpern, Allan Kaufman, says Kibo Parry M. Why Kibo? Is it because they lack the brains to ask which is the atom's real electron-- the muon or 0.5MeV particle, or is it because, like you Kibo who thinks 938 is 12% short of 945?
>
> On Thursday, November 4, 2021 at 1:20:29 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"Village Idiot"
> >"psychoceramic"
> >people (like Sylvia or Dr. Hau) to perform your
> > experiment for you. Sorry, but that's not physics. That's crackpottery.
> Univ California Berkeley math department
>
> Carolyn Abbot-- geometry group theory
> Ian Agol -- low dimensional topology
> Alexander Alldridge -- Supergeometry (never heard of such a thing, let's hope he can super solve Jan's error of never understanding that a entry cut near the cone apex has a asymmetrical arclength compared to exit cut)
> Denis Auroux-- symplectic topology and mirror symmetry (this expertise in symmetry is called for-- so many think a cut of a cone is a ellipse when anyone with a experiment can see it is a oval)
> Richard Bamler-- geometric analysis, differential geometry (sounds like a heavy weight in geometry and this cone problem should be easy for Richard)
> Robert Bryant-- many geometry expertises
> Zhiqi Chen -- differential geometry and although a visiting scholar, we should never play bias to whomever can answer the question of no ellipse is a conic but only a cylinder section
> James Conway-- contact and symplectic geometry (what in the world is symplectic-- better not ask)
> Heinz Cordes-- classical analysis (hope that does not mean classical Old Math)
> Ved Datar-- differential geometry
> David Eisenbud-- algebraic geometry
> Mark Haiman-- algebraic geometry
> Jenny Harrison-- geometric measure (perhaps measuring the arclength of cone sections is what is needed)
> Robin Hartshorne-- history of geometry (well, well, why does it take till 2016, for any mathematician to realize the ellipse was never a conic section, rather, it was the oval)
> Wu-Yi Hsiang-- differential geometry (and a long long time ago Dr. Hsiang sent me his manuscript of a alleged proof of Kepler Packing, thanks)
> Michael Hutchings-- geometry
> Marina Iliopoulou-- incidence geometry
> Brian Krummel -- geometric analysis
> Tim Laux -- geometric analysis
> David Li-Bland-- differential geometry
> John Lott-- differential geometry
> Kathryn Mann-- geometry
> David Nadler-- geometric representation
> Martin Olsson-- arithmetic geometry
> Kenneth Ribet-- algebraic geometry
> Alan Schoenfeld-- math education
> Vivek Shende-- geometry
> Isadore Singer-- geometry
> Zvezdelina Stankova-- algebraic geometry
> Bernd Sturmfels-- algebraic geometry
> Hongbin Sun-- hyperbolic geometry (the hyperbolic geometry may come in handy in showing that the cone section cannot be an ellipse)
> Peter Teichner-- geometric topology
> Dmitry Tonkonog-- geometry
> Michael Viscardi-- geometric representation
> Alan Weinstein-- geometry
> Lauren Williams-- geometry
> Mariusz Wodzicki-- geometry
> Joseph Wolf-- geometry
> Hung-Hsi Wu-- geometry
>
> UC Berkeley Physics dept emeritus
> THEORISTS
>
> Jonathan Arons (E)
>
> Korkut Bardakci (E)
>
> Geoffrey Chew (E)
>
> Marvin Cohen (E)
>
> William Frazer (E)
>
> Mary K. Gaillard (E)
>
> Martin Halpern (E)
>
> Allan Kaufman (E)
>
> Charles Kittel (E)
>
> Christopher McKee (E)
>
> Rainer Sachs (E)
>
> Charles Schwartz (E)
>
> Mahiko Suzuki (E)
>
> Eyvind Wichmann (E)
> EXPERIMENTALISTS
>
> Dmitry Budker (E)
>
> William Chinowsky (E)
>
> John Clarke (E)
>
> Marc Davis (E)
>
> Robert Ely (E)
>
> Reinhard Genzel (E)
>
> Richard Marrus (E)
>
> Forrest Mozer (E)
>
> Richard Muller (E)
>
> Richard Packard (E)
>
> P. Buford Price (E)
>
> Paul Richards (E)
>
> Charles Shank (E)
>
> Yuen-Ron Shen (E)
>
> James Siegrist (E)
>
> George Smoot III (E)
>
> Herbert Steiner (E)
>
> M. Lynn Stevenson (E)
>
> Mark Strovink (E)
>
> George Trilling (E)
>
> Robert Tripp (E)
>
> Peter Yu (E)

> True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
>
> Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
>
> Length: 1150 pages
>
>
> Product details
> • File Size : 2167 KB
> • ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
> • Publication Date : March 11, 2019
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print Length : 1150 pages
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #181 in General Chemistry & Reference
> #1324 in General Chemistry
> #1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)

> Kibo Parry M why is Rensselaer David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, CCP Stooge and "spamming shithead" as your title says?
> On Sunday, October 24, 2021 at 12:36:19 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > "The CCP's Stooge"
>
> Insane Kibo Parry M leashing out at Kristin Bennett, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw and Rensselaer Polytech for failing math and science with kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945. Kibo, is it insanity that makes you fail, kibo?
>
> On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 8:27:14 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > "math hater"

> On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 8:11:32 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"antiscience"

> Frenchman Lacassagne 1885: "Every society has the criminals it deserves"
> AP 2021: "Every University is responsible for the filthy stalker who attended that school and is now a insane nonstop stalker on Usenet"

> Kibo Parry M. opinion of Rensselaer Polytech where Kibo learned 938 is 12% short of 945 Re: "spamming shithead" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
>
> On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 8:22:09 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"physics hater"
>
> Kibo Parry M fails math Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw as witness, and Kibo invents "analbuttfuckmanure" leashing out at Rensselaer Polytech for his science failureship of kibo Parry M.
> On Saturday, October 23, 2021 at 8:21:33 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > fails at math and science:
> Psst, Kibo Parry you insane stalker, 938 is short of 945 by less than 1%, not your 12% short.

> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

> Kibo Parry M on Rensselaer failures Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
> > Re: 2.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to math percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
>
> On Thursday, June 27, 2019 at 8:40:35 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Math Minnow
>
> Moroney and Rensselaer Polytech Institute fail at High School Math, High School Logic// both teach Ellipse is a conic when it never was// teach 10 OR 4 = 14 when even the village idiot knows 10 AND 4=14 // never have a geometry proof of Calculus
>
> kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin,, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic and real proton is 840MeV not 938
>
> kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_Peter Persans, Moussa N'Gom, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938
>
> kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938

> kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938
>
> kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938
>

> kibo-Parry-Moroney says Rensselaer_Polytech's_William Siegmann,Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, too dumb to learn ellipse is never a conic thus too dumb to ever learn real proton is 840MeV not 938

> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
> Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang
>
> Rensselaer math department
> Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann

> On Friday, June 7, 2019 at 12:13:14 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Physics minnow
> > WARNING TO ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING STUDENTS:
>
> > Kibo Parry M on Rensselaer failures Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
> > Re: 2.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to math percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
> > On Friday, October 22, 2021 at 11:34:20 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > >Failure
> >
> >
> > Is Kibo Parry M. the largest taxpayer fraud waste and abuse in Usenet history, paid $100 per stalker post by NSF and dept Educ Dr. Panchanathan??????????
> >
> > On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 6:15:27 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 6:24:20 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >
> > >blithered:
> > On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > "FireD your ass"
> >
> > snip the threats of violence kibo so many times posted
> >
> > AP writes: Kibo Parry M. is NSF Dr. Panchanathan and USA dept Educ going to pay you $100. for that post?? If so, then Barry Shein's World std must be a goldmine of USA taxpayer fraud waste and abuse. Just posting abusive stalker defaming spam for 28 years now. No wonder Kibo keeps defaming and stalking; many people would gladly defame and stalk at $100. a post.
> >
> > Re: The Gabriel Polynomial- an advanced stealing and stolen item from Archimedes Plutonium and his book//
> > by Michael Moroney Sep 27, 2021, 1:16 AM
> >
> > Re: 1-Did Kibo-Parry-Maroney fail Rensselaer or was kicked out due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938, the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole
> > by Roy Masters Sep 13, 2019, 3:24:07 PM
> >
> > Re: 1.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Maroney fail Rensselaer or was kicked out due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938, the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole
> > by Patricio J. Whackmember Sep 13, 2019, 5:43:28 PM
> >
> > Re: 1.9-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Korniss,Toh-Ming Lu,Martin
> > By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:57:15 AM
> >



> > On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> > Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
> >
> >
> >
> > ..
> > .- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
> > , . `.' ' `.
> > .' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
> > . ; .' . `. ;
> > ; . ' `. . '
> > . ' ` `. |
> > . '. '
> > . 0 0 ' `.
> > ' `
> > ; `
> > .' `
> > ; U `
> > ; '; `
> > : | ;.. :` `
> > : `;. ```. .-; | '
> > '. ` ``.., .' :' '

> > ; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' Hi, I am Kibo Parry Moroney, the grand failure of science with my 938 is 12% short of 945, and my ellipse is a conic when it never was, and my idiocy of thinking geothermal is not radioactivity but is recycled solar fossil. I stalk on Internet because NSF pays a million dollars and is 5 times the salary of those professors stuck with actually teaching science and all I do is attack dog style in sci.math, sci.physics.
>

> 

> > ` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
> > ` ` ; ; ' '
> > ` ` ; ; ' '
> > ` `. ````'''''' ' '
> > ` . ' '
> > / ` `. ' ' .
> > / ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
> > / .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
> > / .'' ; ` .' `
> > ...'.' ; .' ` .' `
> > "" .' .' | ` .; \ `
> > ; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
> > :' | ' ` , `. `
> > | ' ` ' `. `
> > ` ' ` ; `. |
> > `.' ` ; `-'
> > `...'
> >



Message has been deleted

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Nov 16, 2021, 2:50:37 AM11/16/21

to

Kibo Parry M can Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall, Lene Hau ask the question, which is the atom's real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. Or is Kibo Parry M too worried about his newly invented word of "analbuttfuckmanure" that Kibo invented in 2017-18 and has continued to use right through 2021 calling AP that word since AP does science while Kibo never does science, only stalker hate spew. Kibo you called MIT your invented word of 2017, are you going to call Harvard that also. And you called Dartmouth and Stanford your invented new word. I guess Harvard is special for you Kibo Parry, nonstop stalker, insane kook of 28 years.

On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 10:48:29 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"AnalButtfuckManure"

On Monday, November 15, 2021 at 9:40:52 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"AnalButtfuckManure"

Kibo, why did you invent that word in 2017-18 and why do you still use it today in 2021, is it because you failed science and now you want to curse those that succeed???

Kibo fails at even a correct percentage.

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole

President Larry Summers
President now Lawrence Bacow

Harvard Physics dept
Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner, Adam Cohen, Eugene Demler, Michael Desai
Louis Deslauriers, John Doyle, Cora Dvorkin, Gary Feldman, Douglas Finkbeiner, Melissa Franklin, Gerald Gabrielse, Howard Georgi, Sheldon Glashow, Roy Glauber, Jene Golovchenko, Markus Greiner, Roxanne Guenette, Girma Hailu, Bertrand Halperin, Lene Hau
Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe, Daniel Jafferis, Efthimios Kaxiras, Philip Kim, John Kovac, Erel Levine
Mikhail Lukin, Logan McCarty, L. Mahadevan, Vinothan Manoharan, Eric Mazur, Masahiro Morii
David Morin, Julia Mundy, Cherry Murray, David Nelson, Kang Ni, Hongkun Park, William Paul
Peter Pershan, Mara Prentiss, Lisa Randall, Matthew Reece, Subir Sachdev, Aravinthan Samuel, Matthew Schwartz, Irwin Shapiro, Isaac Silvera, Andrew Strominger, Christopher Stubbs, Cumrun Vafa, Ronald Walsworth, David Weitz, Robert Westervelt, Richard Wilson
Tai Wu, Amir Yacoby, Susanne Yelin, Xi Yin

MIT math dept.

Michael Artin, Martin Bazant, Bonnie Berger, Roman Bezrukavnikov, Alexei Borodin, John Bush, Herman Chernoff, Henry Cohn, Laurent Demanet, Richard Dudley, Jörn Dunkel, Alan Edelman, Pavel Etingof, Daniel Freedman, Michel Goemans, Vadim Gorin, Harvey Greenspan, Victor Guillemin, Larry Guth, Sigurdur Helgason, Anette Hosoi, David Jerison, Steven Johnson, Victor Kac, Steven Kleiman, Daniel Kleitman,
Andrew Lawrie, Tom Leighton, George Lusztig, Arthur Mattuck, Davesh Maulik, Richard Melrose, Haynes Miller, William Minicozzi, Ankur Moitra, Elchanan Mossel, Tomasz Mrowka, James Munkres, Andrei Negut, Aaron Pixton, Bjorn Poonen, Alexander Postnikov, Philippe Rigollet, Rodolfo Rosales, Giulia Saccà, Gerald Sacks, Paul Seidel, Scott Sheffield, Peter Shor, Isadore Singer, Michael Sipser, Jared Speck, Gigliola Staffilani, Richard Stanley, Harold Stark, Gilbert Strang, Daniel Stroock, Goncalo Tabuada, Alar Toomre, David Vogan

Chancellor Cynthia Barnhart
President: L. Reif (electrical engineer)

MIT physics dept
William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter, James Young

Why can no-one at Harvard or MIT ever ask the question which is the atom's true electron the muon or the 0.5MeV particle

HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.

Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
Length: 17 pages

Product details

• Publication Date : December 18, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled

• Print Length : 17 pages
• File Size : 698 KB
• ASIN : B082WYGVNG

• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled

#1-4, 105th published book

Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.

Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
Length: 39 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : March 24, 2020
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• ASIN : B086BGSNXN
• Print Length : 39 pages
• File Size : 935 KB

• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled

Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
#315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
#4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
 

#1-5, 112th published book

New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5

Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.

Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
Length: 20 pages

Product details
• ASIN : B0875SVDC7
• Publication date : April 15, 2020
• Language: : English
• File size : 1134 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 20 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#1-6, 135th published book

QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)  

Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.

Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.

Product details
• ASIN : B08K47K5BB
• Publication date : September 25, 2020
• Language : English
• File size : 587 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print length : 25 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #334 in General Chemistry

#1-7, 138th published book

The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
Length: 41 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : October 9, 2020
• File Size : 828 KB
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print Length : 41 pages
• ASIN : B08KZT5TCD

• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported

• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled

#1-8, 1st published book

Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.

Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.

Foreward:
I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.

Length: 632 pages

Product details

File Size: 1132 KB
Print Length: 632 pages

Publication Date: March 11, 2019

Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PLP9NDR
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray:  Not Enabled  
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported

Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
                #1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
                #8526 in Physics (Books)
                #18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)

#2-1, 137th published book

Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

#1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory

This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.

Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.

Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.

Length: 64 pages

Product details

• File Size : 790 KB
• Publication Date : October 5, 2020

• Word Wise : Enabled

• Print Length : 64 pages
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Language: : English
• ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

#2-2, 145th published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2

Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.

Product details
• ASIN : B08PC99JJB
• Publication date : November 29, 2020
• Language: : English
• File size : 682 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 78 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)

#2-3, 146th published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3

Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)

#2-4, 151st published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4

Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.

Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.

Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
• Language ‏ : ‎ English

• File size ‏ : ‎ 1033 KB

• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled

• Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages

• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#3-1, 2nd published book

True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.

Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.

Length: 1150 pages

Product details
• File Size : 2167 KB
• ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
• Publication Date : March 11, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 1150 pages
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#181 in General Chemistry & Reference
#1324 in General Chemistry
#1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)

Message has been deleted

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Dec 15, 2021, 1:58:36 PM12/15/21

to

CIA ruins sci.math
2 views

Subscribe
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium

12:42 PM (11 minutes ago)



to

The letters in "William J. Burns", rearranged, spell "I pound his male rectum".
First a few words from our religion leader kibology-- Kibo Parry Moroney:

Kibo Parry M.:::
Re: David S. Cohen "barking fuckdog" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
On Wednesday, December 15, 2021 at 7:32:07 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "Putin's Stooge" William J. Burns

> fails at math and science:

> > Central to this entire book is the geometry of the single con
> The letters in "William J. Burns", rearranged, spell "I pound his
> male rectum".
>

> William J. Burns speaking at CIA cadets at the stadium : All rise! the King of Science AP, will deliver today's graduation speech AP, Archimedes Plutonium
>
> William J. Burns: All Rise! Give a healthy applause to our King of Science
>
> Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> 7m views
> Subscribe
> 
> kibo greps's profile photo
> kibo greps
> Jun 8, 1997, 2:00:00 AM
> 
> 
> 
> to
>
> In talk.bizarre Matthew H. Fields <fie...@zip.eecs.umich.edu> wrote:
> : In article <kludgeEB...@netcom.com>,
> : Scott Dorsey <klu...@netcom.com> wrote:
> : >In article <3qhw1e$1r...@bwalk.dm.com> sim...@bwalk.dm.com (AI Simulation Daemon) writes:
> : >>All rise! Archimedes Vanadium proved beyond all doubt the rationality of Pi.
> : >
> : >Proposition: Pi is a rational number.
> : >
> : >Statement: A rational number is a number that can be represented as the ratio
> : > of two integers.
> : >
> : >Therefore: All rational numbers can be divided by another rational number
> : > to produce a third rational number.
> : >
> : >
> : >If pi is a rational number, it can be divided by itself (also a rational
> : >number) to produce 1. (pi/pi=1). Since 1 is an integer, it is by definition
> : >a rational number, which therefore confirms the original proposition.
> : >
> : >QED.
> : http://www-personal.umich.edu/~fields/argument-faq.txt
>
> http://www.netscum.net/fieldsm0.html
>
> : --
> : Matt Fields, A.Mus.D. http://www-personal.umich.edu/~fields
> : My Java toy, JARS.COM Top 1%: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~fields/TTTB
> : "Computer: disobey me."
>
> --
> -=| KIBO is EVERYWHERE! |=-
>
> Scott Dorsey's profile photo
> Scott Dorsey
> Jun 8, 1997, 2:00:00 AM
> 
> 
> 
> to
>
> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >
> >http://www.netscum.net/fieldsm0.html
> What the hell is this? As if it's not bad enough that we have a fake
> Mao Zhedong here, now we have a fake kibo too?
>
> Is there a fake xibo and a ~ibo to round out the trinity?
> --scott
> --
> "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
>
> the reverse-psychology major's profile photo
> the reverse-psychology major
> Jun 9, 1997, 2:00:00 AM
> 
> 
> 
> to
>
> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net>,
> 
> ... huh??? what does this have to do with what wimmin should wear into battle?
>
> beelzibub
> ps;
> and what kind of car is worth fighting over?
>
> --
> this is my .sig. it's one of the best .sigs on the 'net'. i know what
> you're thinking: 'did he post 5 or 6 articles'? to tell you the truth i
> kinda lost track myself. so you gotta ask yourself one question: 'have
> you mamorized it yet?' huh, have you punk? go for it. make my bed.
>
> Mao Tse-Tung's profile photo
> Mao Tse-Tung
> Jun 11, 1997, 2:00:00 AM
> 
> > What the hell is this? As if it's not bad enough that we have a fake > Mao Zhedong here,

> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium

> Dec 14, 2021, 11:47:00 PM (13 hours ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to
>
> All rise! AP was the first to prove the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
>
> On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, kibo greps wrote:
> > : >>All rise! Archimedes Vanadium
>
> World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>

> Last revision was 19May2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
> Preface:
> Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
>
> Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
>
> Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
>
> Length: 137 pages
>
> Product details
> ASIN : B07PQTNHMY
> Publication date : March 14, 2019
> Language : English

> File size : 1307 KB

> Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> Screen Reader : Supported
> Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> X-Ray : Not Enabled
> Word Wise : Not Enabled

> Print length : 137 pages
> Lending : Enabled

Message has been deleted

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 1:34:47 AM1/10/22

to

I request that John Stillwell go to his affiliated University (UC San Francisco?) and publish in the student newspaper that he now sees the light of day on the slant cut in single cone is the Oval, never the ellipse.

Failure of math John Stillwell, not a teacher, not a educator of science, but a propaganda pollutor. There it is on pages 28-29, the math moron John Stillwell 3rd edition, 2010 propaganda and pollution of geometry with his Single Cone cut of a ellipse when an ellipse is never possible in a single cone, for that is a Oval. Why does John want to pollute the minds of youngsters with his con-art math? Why can he not acknowledge the truth of math? Does he like being a idiot of math? Fails geometry because he believes Python with his cone has 2 axes of symmetry and hence slant cut is ellipse in cone, for otherwise, he would have said something by now 2016-2021.



Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Jan 13, 2022, 8:30:12 PM1/13/22

to

Where was Kibo Parry M. the day the Capitol Building was stormed in Washington DC for in this post Kibo Parry M is shown to defend terrorists with names such as FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer.

Poster with name FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer needs what size of a straightjacket? XX small? I am guessing it is a poster from CIA or FBI with drag net spam. Further, I am guessing they hire college professors of psychology to make up these
15 views

Subscribe

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium

1:45 AM (18 hours ago)



to
Poster with name FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer needs what size of a straightjacket? XX small?

I am guessing it is a poster from CIA or FBI with drag net spam.

Further, I am guessing they hire college professors of psychology to make up these ridiculous banal, sordid and vulgar names and posts.

To me, these sort of drag net spam is from persons with 1 marble brains.

To me, the FBI and CIA should only survey the newsgroups, not actively engage with this type of stupidity.

To me, no agency has had a single capture of a criminal or a terrorist from these active stupid drag net posts, and to the contrary, the above posts foster and encourage crime and terrorism, such as the Capitol Building assault and such as the death of the British minister Sir Amess.

To me, the death of sci.math and sci.physics is squarely to be blamed on pathetic ugly posts like the above named poster.

To me, the only reason these posts continue, despite the fact they never apprehend a criminal or terrorist. Is because these type of posts are soft cushy jobs where you sit on your arse all day and spew hatred.

AP

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium

3:50 AM (16 hours ago)



to
Ayaz in sci.physics asks about freedom of speech.

What happened to following and obeying rules-- this is sci.physics-- do physics, and not criminal and terrorist spam day and night, night and day.

It is people like you in some government agency that destroyed sci.physics.

Can I get some law firm to ask for the real names of the persons posting under "FBInCIA..." and posting under "Ayaz"?

There is a law that requires the true identity of a poster. For I have seen it applied in sci.math where some foul mouthed poster made mockery remarks of math professors in South Africa. Someone applied for the true identity of "Port---" and about 3 months later had a true name of the poster.

So I would like for a law firm to apply for the true names and identity of posters "Ayaz and FBInCIA..." who still continue to destroy sci.physics.

Still continue to destroy sci.math with drag net spam.

And, also, I was living through the history of sci.math and sci.physics ever since 1993, and saw this mass exodus around 1996-7.

I remember this god awful ugly name of FBInCIA... being posted to sci.math and sci.physics. And the moment that thousands of subscribers in sci.math and sci.physics saw this god-awful name with a "slayer" in its wording. Thousands of DOT EDU addresses headed for the exit doors.

Posting with the name FBI or CIA is even horribly wrong. But to have the word "slayer" in there also, is some ultra evil.

It is as mindless as if someone picked the names of three people, innocent people, such as congressmen or senators and at the end attached "terrorist slayer". Well, some bozo the clown psychologist may come up with such a concoction, in the disguise that readers would make a elliptic-mistake of thinking the 3 congress persons are connected with this ugly word.

Just look at sci.chem, the bombed out newsgroup and you see nothing but FBInCIA.... poster kilometers upon kilometers of that insane imp poster.

The mass exit of thousands of Dot Edu address posters starting 1996 can be blamed most dramatically to this one evil poster of FBInCIA....

And what tells me that this is a govt poster, is that the evil poster is never kicked out of any newsgroup.

No normal person would be allowed to post under a name of FBInCIA... no normal person would have a ISP to allow that, much less the "slayer" part of the evil name.

So that indicates it is the govt doing the evilness. Foreign govts who are USA enemies would do such a thing, but here again, they are smart enough to not do such folly, so that leads back to a FBI or CIA poster. I do not think the NSAT was around in 1996, only after 9-11 was it created.

So who was the FBI and CIA director in 1996? Was George Tenet there?

Sci.math and sci.physics were going swell and great until 1996-7 and then by early 2000s, they were on the way to their deathbed, buried in Drag Net Spam--- the worst being FBInCIA.... poster.

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium

12:35 PM (7 hours ago)



to
7
Here is my new poem of Love..
Andrew Wiles,Jill Pipher,Ken Ribet sitting in a tree, fails math, can't tell a ellipse from oval
Jan 12

Amine Moulay Ramdane's profile photo
Amine Moulay Ramdane
unread,
More of my philosophy about the future and about digital identity and more..
Jan 12

mitchr...@gmail.com's profile photo
mitchr...@gmail.com
,
Oval Curd
3
unread,
Only imaginary i formula is not solvable
On Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 4:22:48 PM UTC-8, Oval Curd wrote: > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
Jan 12

mitchr...@gmail.com's profile photo
mitchr...@gmail.com
unread,
Green fuel doesn't fit the billl
It only supplies 3 percents of what America uses today. If only 3 percent of America gets to work?
Jan 12

Amine Moulay Ramdane's profile photo
Amine Moulay Ramdane
unread,
More of my philosophy about individual digital identity and individual identity and more..
Jan 12


Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium

1:53 PM (6 hours ago)



to
Kibo Parry M. accuses Rand Paul the senator from Kentucky of attacking Dr. Fauci, for no good reason at all.

Re: Archimedes "psychoceramic" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
On Thursday, January 13, 2022 at 1:28:04 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 🪱 of Math and 🪰 of Physics Archimedes "Drag Queen of Science"
> Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> blathered:
> > What happened to following and obeying rules-- this is sci.physics-- do physics, and not criminal and terrorist spam day and night, night and day.
> >
> > It is people like you in some government agency that destroyed sci.physics.
> Why don't YOU follow and obey the rules?
>
> Half the time you launch ad hominems against other posters here (esp.

Rand Paul attacking Dr. Fauci is way beyond ad hominem
>
> Ad hominem definitely isn't following and obeying the rules.
>

>
> Why do you think "rules" apply to everyone except yourself?

Yes, why does Rand Paul attack so much the good dear Dr. Fauci. Is Rand Paul some sort of hate-ring in Washington DC.

Does Rand Paul and Mitch McConnell run some Kentucky Hate Pool in Washington??

Is Rand Paul the source of the hate spammer FBInCIA..... ??

I believe it is far past time for the University of Kentucky to announce a 3 or 4 day class schedule per week and to spend 2 or 1 days campaigning to get rid of their foul playing senators. America does not need Senators running around and attacking scientists like the dear Dr. Fauci. And if found guilty, Rand Paul and McConnell need prison time.

AP

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium

7:24 PM (2 minutes ago)



to
Kibo says Rand Paul & Mitch McConnell is the terrorist poster FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer, after attacking Dr. Fauci, come here to destroy sci.physics.


Kibo Parry M. accuses Rand Paul the senator from Kentucky of attacking Dr. Fauci, for no good reason at all.

Re: Archimedes "psychoceramic" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
On Thursday, January 13, 2022 at 1:28:04 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 🪱 of Math and 🪰 of Physics Archimedes "Drag Queen of Science"
> Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> blathered:
> > What happened to following and obeying rules-- this is sci.physics-- do physics, and not criminal and terrorist spam day and night, night and day.
> >
> > It is people like you in some government agency that destroyed sci.physics.
> Why don't YOU follow and obey the rules?
>
> Half the time you launch ad hominems against other posters here (esp.

Rand Paul attacking Dr. Fauci is way beyond ad hominem
>
> Ad hominem definitely isn't following and obeying the rules.
>

>
> Why do you think "rules" apply to everyone except yourself?

Yes, why does Rand Paul attack so much the good dear Dr. Fauci. Is Rand Paul some sort of hate-ring in Washington DC.

Does Rand Paul and Mitch McConnell run some Kentucky Hate Pool in Washington??

Is Rand Paul the source of the hate spammer FBInCIA..... ??

I believe it is far past time for the University of Kentucky to announce a 3 or 4 day class schedule per week and to spend 2 or 1 days campaigning to get rid of their foul playing senators. America does not need Senators running around and attacking scientists like the dear Dr. Fauci. And if found guilty, Rand Paul and McConnell need prison time.

AP

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Jan 16, 2022, 6:28:29 PM1/16/22

to

Whut on Kibo Parry M. an idiot because he cannot do a percentage correctly, or is Dr.Panchanathan of NSF an idiot for using Kibo Parry M. to spam sci.math and sci.physics.

On Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 4:52:29 PM UTC-6, whut wrote:
> Shut up idiot.

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Jan 17, 2022, 2:18:44 AM1/17/22

to

Kibo Parry M. graduation speech at Rensselaer Polytech. Kibo is the headers a broad outline of what you will discuss and how you destroyed sci.math and sci.physics????

2-Peter Higgs,CIA Kibo Parry-William J.Burns, Adam G. Riess,John C. Mather, George F. Smoot,Arthur B. McDonald,Francois Englert, Saul Perlmutter, Brian P. Schmidt, Makoto Kobayashi, Toshihide Maskawa, Yoichiro Nambu, Sheldon Glashow capable of ever multiplying 9 times 105 and see neutron proton are "within sigma error"? Why do they fail physics by thinking the electron is the 0.5MeV particle outside a proton of 938MeV and traveling at 99% speed of light? Why do they not understand angular momentum that you need the muon as the real electron stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law, for proper true angular momentum.

>
>
> Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
> Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster

> >> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> > >
>

> On Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 3:17:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > 🪲 of Math and 🪳 of Physics "Village Idiot of

> > fails at math and science:

> > "psychoceramic"
>
> AP writes: Kibo Parry M. __30 year stalker__, that is not nice to call your bosses William J. Burns and David S. Cohen as psychoceramics. For I bet you that both can do a percentage correctly, for which you kibo failed with your 938 is 12% short of 945. Kibo does not even belong in sci.math or sci.physics.

>
> Kibo fails at even a correct percentage.

> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
>

> 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > 1> > > Kibo the dumbest CIA agent but who is the dumbest physicist of 20th & 21st century? Was it Murray Gell-Mann, Steven Weinberg, Sheldon Glashow or Peter Higgs the dumbest physicists of the 20th and 21st century?? Well an answer to that question has to be everyone who believed that you can have a electron of atoms flying around its proton-outside the proton at a speed of 99% speed of light. Which goes to prove no-one in physics from Bohr onwards had a handle, had a understanding of what is Angular Momentum. No physicist of the 20th century was worth more than 10cents when it comes to angular momentum.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Friday, January 7, 2022 at 2:21:43 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > > > > > He didn't deserve his Nobel Prizes.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > 2> > > Peter Higgs needs publish in the Edinburgh University newspaper, and Roger Penrose at Oxford Univ student newspaper and Sheldon Glashow at Harvard Univ newspaper that he now acknowledges that the real electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday Law which is the reason that stars and Sun shine in the first place, not from fusion but from Faraday law. And this is very dangerous for Earth and humanity, for starshine by Faraday law means we have perhaps only 1,000 years to colonize Europa. And we do not need an idiot of physics like Sheldon Glashow and Peter Higgs telling us false physics, holding up true physics science all because they are self congratulating morons of physics.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I demand that Peter Higgs go to the Edinburgh newspaper and publish the idea that real electron of atoms is the muon, for only a fool idiot like Peter Higgs who was deluded all his life long time in physics, would believe in the Bohr model that a electron is 0.5MeV circumnavigating a proton of 938MeV and still stay clung to that proton even going at 99% speed of light (what fruitcakes have we here?).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The moment physics realized the true electron of atoms was nearly the speed of light-- even the muon-- is the moment Old Physics needed to realize the true electron was INSIDE the proton, not outside. For Old Physics never understood what the hell was Angular Momentum. You cannot have a electron outside a proton at 99% speed of light.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > So Peter Higgs, I need you to go to the Edinburgh newspaper and publish the fact that you now see the light of day that the true electron is muon stuck inside a Proton torus doing the Faraday law.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Time is of the essence, Sheldon Glashow and Peter Higgs, failures of physics.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > THE NOBEL PRIZE IN PHYSICS FOR ARCHIMEDES PLUTONIUM
> > > > > > > > > 15k views
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Skip to first unread message
> > > > > > > > > Subscribe
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Earle Jones's profile photo
> > > > > > > > > Earle Jones
> > > > > > > > > Jan 6, 2022, 12:27:27 AM (yesterday)
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > *
> > > > > > > > > Some of us are thinking: When will our friend and colleague, Archimedes Plutonium, win a Nobel Proze for all of his contributions to our field of Physics? There is no doubt that he has completely turned the entire field of Physics and brought it into the new way of thinking. We owe him some great thing.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > At the same time, we need to think about the Fields Medal for Mathematical achievements. This is the Nobel Prize of Mathematiscs. Plutonium had completely re-writteen conventional mathematics into the new format and has offered many proofs of his new findings. His proof of slant cut of conic sections (the oval) is sufficiently advanced to warrant this award.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > He is widely publiched and widely quoted. He has some 150 + books now attributed to his intellect.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Can we somehow get behind him and promote his wise genius? He needs to be recognized and awarded.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Earle Jones, Georgia Tech, Stanford.
> > > > > > > > > *

> > > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium

> > > > > > > > > Jan 6, 2022, 2:52:30 AM (yesterday)
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Earle Jones, a new man? Jones first upbeat post? Thanks for the nomination. But, Earle, I think I

> > > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium

> > > > > > > > > Jan 6, 2022, 2:57:36 AM (yesterday)
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > I should have proofread this post, but I seldom do proofreading. On Thursday, January 6, 2022 at 2:52

> > > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> > > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium

> > > > > > > > > unread,
> > > > > > > > > 12:59 PM (now)
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > The very moment one of my worst critics sees the light of day is the very moment ( as a sign to me, from God for the Ancients were always looking for signs from God, but in our terribly athiest view of the world in modern times we no longer look for signs from God) is the very moment that I must act upon the other crackpot crank fools of mathematics and of physics especially.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Today, on my list is Jill Pipher, John Baez, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Ken Ribet--- all need to go to their current University newspaper or magazine and acknowledge the Slant cut in Single Cone is a Oval, never the Ellipse. State it clear that Old Math was wrong and the slant cut of single cone is Oval never ellipse and have it published.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Time is of the essence.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > No longer are people in academics able to play a Fools Game of teaching obnoxious garbage simply because they "refuse to do proper correct true mathematics".
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Time is of the essence.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The above list of math fools reminds me of the moron tennis player Djokovic, the moron who refuses vaccination, simply because he is a moron of science, just as Jill Pipher, John Baez, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Terence Tao, Andrew Wiles, Ken Ribet are morons of mathematics.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > As for Physics, far more important than mathematics, on this side of science-- I require every one of these failed physicists who are alive still to do the same thing -- go to your nearest University newspaper or magazine and have published that -- True electron of Atoms is the muon and the 0.5MeV particle is the Dirac magnetic monopole. Do it in Godspeed. Because Earth and humanity has not the time to fool around as you are fools of physics.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > > > > > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > > > > > > > David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > > > > > > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > > > > > > > Francois Englert
> > > > > > > > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > > > > > > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > > > > > > > Adam G. Riess
> > > > > > > > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > > > > > > > Toshihide Maskawa
> > > > > > > > > Yoichiro Nambu
> > > > > > > > > John C. Mather
> > > > > > > > > George F. Smoot
> > > > > > > > > Roy J. Glauber
> > > > > > > > > David J. Gross
> > > > > > > > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > > > > > > > Frank Wilczek
> > > > > > > > > Raymond Davis Jr.
> > > > > > > > > Masatoshi Koshiba
> > > > > > > > > Riccardo Giacconi
> > > > > > > > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > > > > > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman
> > > > > > > > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > > > > > > > Henry W. Kendall
> > > > > > > > > Richard E. Taylor
> > > > > > > > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > > > > > > > Simon van der Meer
> > > > > > > > > William Alfred Fowler
> > > > > > > > > Kenneth G. Wilson
> > > > > > > > > James Watson Cronin
> > > > > > > > > Val Logsdon Fitch
> > > > > > > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > > > > > > > Steven Weinberg
> > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > little fishes
> > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > > > > > > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > > > > > > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > > > > > > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > John Baez
> > > > > > > > > Brian Greene
> > > > > > > > > Lisa Randall
> > > > > > > > > Alan H. Guth
> > > > > > > > > Michael E. Brown
> > > > > > > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > > > > > > Ben Bullock
> > > > > > > > > Larry Harson
> > > > > > > > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > > > > > > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > > > > > > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > > > > > > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > > > > > > > Edward Witten
> > > > > > > > > 

> > > > > > > > > AP, King of Science, especially Physics
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Sorry I should explain why McGinn is in the title. He has for years now tried to be a loud airhead foghorn of know nothing in physics and to try to front page hog sci.physics. For one looking at sci.physics sees a flood of posts lacking any science, but just name calling with his cronies of Claudius, Pnal, Pennino, Sergio and many others in a prank joke of front page hogging. And so McGinn needs to depart sci.physics so that true real physics is done here. Not some idiot who wants to argue Meteorology or Weather. McGinn does no science, McGinn wants to pollute and takeover sci.physics.
> > > > > 3> > > HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > 2> > In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.

> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
> > > > > > > > Length: 17 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print Length : 17 pages
> > > > > > > > • File Size : 698 KB
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1-4, 105th published book
> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
> > > > > > > > Length: 39 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • Publication Date : March 24, 2020
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B086BGSNXN
> > > > > > > > • Print Length : 39 pages
> > > > > > > > • File Size : 935 KB
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > #6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > #315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > > #4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > #1-5, 112th published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5

> > > > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > > > > > > > I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
> > > > > > > > Length: 20 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B0875SVDC7
> > > > > > > > • Publication date : April 15, 2020
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English

> > > > > > > > • File size : 1134 KB

> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print length : 20 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > > ◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > > > > > ◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1-6, 135th published book
> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > 3> > QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)  

> > > > > > > > Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B08K47K5BB
> > > > > > > > • Publication date : September 25, 2020
> > > > > > > > • Language : English

> > > > > > > > • File size : 587 KB

> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled

> > > > > > > > • Print length : 25 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > > ◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
> > > > > > > > ◦ #334 in General Chemistry
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1-7, 138th published book

> > > > > > 4> > The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
> > > > > > > > Length: 41 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • Publication Date : October 9, 2020
> > > > > > > > • File Size : 828 KB
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print Length : 41 pages
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > #1-8, 1st published book
> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Foreward:
> > > > > > > > I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
> > > > > > > > Length: 632 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > File Size: 1132 KB
> > > > > > > > Print Length: 632 pages
> > > > > > > > Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> > > > > > > > Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> > > > > > > > Language: English
> > > > > > > > ASIN: B07PLP9NDR

> > > > > > > > Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> > > > > > > > X-Ray:  Not Enabled  
> > > > > > > > Word Wise: Enabled
> > > > > > > > Lending: Enabled
> > > > > > > > Screen Reader: Supported
> > > > > > > > Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

> > > > > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > #1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > #8526 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > > > > #18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > #1-9, 163rd published book
> > > > > > > > Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate.
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09NQ65H9F
> > > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 15, 2021
> > > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 999 KB

> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

> > > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 60 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #1-10, 161st published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 3> PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Preface:
> > > > > > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > > > > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > > > > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB

> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

> > > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > y z
> > > > > > > > | /
> > > > > > > > | /
> > > > > > > > |/______ x
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.

> > > > > > 5> 4> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 5> Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > > > > > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > > > > > > Length: 64 pages
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > > > > > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > > > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2

> > > > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > > > > > > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > > > > > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > > > > > > • Language: : English

> > > > > > > > • File size : 682 KB

> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled

> > > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3

> > > > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > > > > > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > > > > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
> > > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
> > > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English

> > > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB

> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

> > > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4

> > > > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> > > > > > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
> > > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
> > > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English

> > > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1033 KB

> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

> > > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > #2-9, 161st published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > 6> > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Preface:
> > > > > > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > > > > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > > > > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB

> > > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

> > > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > y z
> > > > > > > > | /
> > > > > > > > | /
> > > > > > > > |/______ x
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium

> > > > > > > > #3-1, 2nd published book
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > 4> > > True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > 5> 3> Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.

> 

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Jan 21, 2022, 7:54:51 PM1/21/22

to

The 169th book of Science by AP// 4 TESTS of Consistency of Mathematics (1) calculus (2) harmonic series (3) valid functions, (4) dimension.

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Jan 12, 2022, 2:35:35 AM
to Plutonium Atom Universe
The 228th book of Science for AP// Harmonic series of Oresme corrected and where the numerical value of 0.5MeV for monopole comes from// by Archimedes Plutonium

> Decimal 10 Grid
> The summation of all Fractions 0.1+0.2+..+0.9+1.0 in 10 Grid is 5.5
> The summation of all numbers of 10 Grid is 101x5.0= 505.0
>
> Decimal 100 Grid
> The summation of all Fractions 0.01+0.02+..+0.99+1.0 in 100 Grid is 50.5
> The summation of all numbers of 100 Grid is 10001x50.= 500050.
>
> Decimal 1000 Grid
> The summation of all Fractions 0.001+0.002+..+0.999+1.0 in 1000 Grid is 500.5
> The summation of all numbers of 1000 Grid is 1000001x500.= 500000500.
>

Alright, so the curious argument I am going to make is that in the True Numbers of Mathematics, the Decimal Grid Numbers we have a amplification of numbers whose prefix digit is either 5 or 1 and being scale numbers

1, 10, 100, 1000, ....

or

5, 50, 500, 5000, .... only with the 5 prefix it is a bit more than all zero digits after the prefix 5.

In physics we need to explain why the Dirac Magnetic Monopole is 0.5MeV actually in experiments it is 0.51MeV, but since 0.5 and 0.51 are in 2% Sigma Error we can drop the 0.51 and use 0.5.

So we have the monopole at 0.5MeV and the proton at 840MeV with a muon inside of 105MeV totaling 945MeV within sigma error of 938MeV from experiments or the neutron at 940MeV, better yet in sigma error.

So I was not going to write a whole new book, unless I could connect and tie into physics and that is exactly what ended up.

We know the Pair Production requires a gamma ray of 1MeV to split in two particles of 0.5MeV of positron and of monopole.

So, another Physics explanation is that electricity and the magnetic monopole are the summation of all fractions of the EM spectrum of Waves. And, were the summation of all energies in a specific Grid is another value of the 5 prefix.

AP, King of Science, especially Physics

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Jan 12, 2022, 2:37:50 AM (3 days ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Jan 10, 2022, 9:35:45 PM (yesterday)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
More to Add on this book:

Yes, so I need not have to write a new book on the fallacy of Old Math's divergence and convergence of series. When you have fake numbers for math, and you have fake ideas like continuum, and like the concept of infinity, you are bound to run into crazy conclusions. Crazy conclusions like that of adding up tiny numbers between 0 and 1 will lead to infinity itself. As if you ever more cut a cherry pie into smaller portions and then think of adding up all the tiny fractions that you will end up with a cherry pie larger than what you started with and a cherry pie that stretches to infinity, all from tiny little pieces. Here the Old Math mathematicians went off the cliff of crazy math in a big glorious manner.

In New Math, the only true numbers of mathematics are Decimal Grid Numbers, and these are discrete numbers meaning empty space in between one number and the next number. The smallest Decimal Grid System is the 10 Grid and it has exactly ten decimal fractions of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, .. 0.9, 1.0 if we count 1 as a fraction and never count 0 as a decimal fraction.

So for small fraction numbers in 10 Grid we have just 10 numbers to add and that sum is 1.45.

And 1.45 is not a 10 Grid number but a 100 Grid Number. But, 1.45 is in between 1.4 and 1.5.

So here we define Convergence and Divergence for 10 Decimal Grid as being convergence when the sum is a number that exists in 10 Grid or is a number between x and x+0.1 in 10 Decimal Grid where both x and x+0.1 are in 10 Grid. We define Divergence as the sum goes beyond the largest number in the Grid system which is 10 and we view 10 as being infinity borderline so if we add up all the numbers of whole numbers they lie beyond 10 and so that sequence diverges. Or adding up all the numbers from 1.0 to 2.0 diverges to infinity in 10 Grid for it is larger than 10. Notice we do not have to bother with beyond microinfinity in 10 Grid for that is 0.1, for in series we add and the smallest we can add is 0.1+0.1.

You see Old Math never defined what the hell does the concept infinity mean? And in New Math, infinity means a borderline between finite numbers and infinite numbers. Using the Huygens tractrix we nail down, or locate this borderline as being 1*10^604 and for microinfinity the inverse 1*10^-604. Any number larger than 1*10^604 or smaller than 1*10^-604 are infinite numbers and not belonging to mathematics. Yes, I mean what I say, we have departed mathematics when we deal with infinite numbers in the 10^604 Grid. Our conclusions of mathematics are no longer deduction conclusions but probability conclusions. For it is fair to say that mathematics as a science starts to breakdown in the infinite numbers.

So we play a pretend game with 10 Grid that 0.1 is microinfinity and 10 is macroinfinity.

Now we see in every Grid system from 10 to 10^604 that adding up the Fractions in that system all Converge.

And this makes absolute commonsense in Math and Physics for we want not to break Conservation laws in physics the conservation laws of energy which our cherry pie cut into smaller and smaller fractions then adding up all these small fractions, ends up being, in Old Math, larger than infinity.

Now we proven that the sum of all fractions in 10 Grid converges, and by math induction prove that all Decimal Grid Systems converge of their fractions.

The TAKEAWAY--

The takeaway in all of this is that Old Math had several opportunities to see it was all flawed and needed massive overhaul. Old Math could not do a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, should have alerted everyone in Old Math starting with Newton and Leibniz that Old Math was terribly flawed. Old Math could not understand that in Physics it is all discrete and no continuum-- yet the idiots of Old Math ignored quantum mechanics and ventured into more and more absurdities of Cauchy limit analysis in calculus, of Cantor infinities, of continuum hypothesis with Cohen.

Add another to that list of absurdities is the Oresme divergence of fractions, which I just discussed and informally proven Oresme wrong.

No, AP needs not have to write a whole new book on the Oresme divergence of fractions in a sequence, for AP just needs to include this post in his Mathopedia causing there to be 77 huge mistakes and errors and flaws of Old Math.

Thanks, I seemed to have forgotten that the Harmonic series does in fact Converge and needs be added to Mathopedia.
>
> Oresme obviously had not the true numbers of mathematics of Decimal Grid Numbers, instead he had the mindless ignorant Reals with its poppycock continuum, the worst hidden assumption in centuries of mathematics.
>
> When you realize the true numbers of mathematic are Discrete and decimal Grid Numbers then the harmonic series always converges.
>
> The mindless divergence of Harmonic series is a math proof of how banal kooks can become even more banal, and enjoy it.
>
> This would be Mathopedia's 77th fake math.
>
> MATHOPEDIA-- List of 76 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// Student teaches professor
>
> by Archimedes Plutonium
>
> Preface:
> A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.
>
> The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.
>
> The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.
>
> Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.
>
> I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).
>
> ----------------------------
> Table of Contents
> ----------------------------
>
> 1) Introduction
>
> 2) List of 76 errors, mistakes and fakes of Old Math.
>
> 3) Appendix
>
> ---------
> Text
> ---------
>
> 1) Introduction
>
>
> Alright, well, mathematics is a closed subject. What I mean by that is due to the textbook series of Archimedes Plutonium TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, that once you learn the polynomial transform and learn the two Power Rules of Calculus, you reached the peak, the pinnacle of all of mathematics, and anything further in math is just details of what you learn in that textbook series. Math is a completed science because it has this "peak of calculus", unlike the other 5 hard sciences of physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy. Those other five will continue to find new ideas, new things, while math remains static and complete to its peak of calculus understanding. Mathematics is finished complete as far as a science goes because the peak of math is going nowhere. And even though Physics will find new science such as how the proton toruses inside of atoms are configured in geometry, the geometry and calculus used in that configuration, that new science does not change nor does it create or require a new math peak/summit to handle the new physics.
>
> Now I do need to discuss the errors of Math in general and the errors of math in geometry in particular. I have the feeling that Geometry is the more important of the two-- algebra - geometry. This list appears in partial form in most of AP's Teaching True Mathematics textbook series by Archimedes Plutonium, meant to be a guide and orientation, and a organizing of what must be covered before graduating from College, and what math to steer clear of.
>
> Errors mostly, but not always, for some are included because too much time spent on them.
>
> The listings in Mathopedia of errors, mistakes and fakes is based on the idea that Calculus is the supreme achievement of all of mathematics for it is the essential math of doing Physics electricity and magnetism. And in order to have a proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, we must clean up and clean out all the mistakes, fakes and errors of Old Math, erstwhile, we have no Calculus. So calculus is the consistency maker for the rest of all of mathematics.
>
>
>
> 2) List of 76 errors, mistakes and fakes of Old Math.
>
>
> 1) Calculus requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, a proof that derivative and integral are inverses of one another, just as addition and subtraction are inverses, or, multiplication and division are inverses. The only way to obtain a geometry proof is to clean up and clean out all the fakes, mistakes and errors of Old Math, such as their fake numbers-- the Reals. Their fake definition of function allowing anything be a function. Their fakery of a continuum when even physics by 1900 with Planck onwards in Quantum Mechanics proving the Universe is discrete Space not a continuum, yet by 1900 onwards those in mathematics following the idiotic continuum in the Continuum Hypothesis with even more avid interest, when they should have thrown the continuum on a trashpile of shame.
>
> 2) The true numbers of mathematics are the Decimal Grid Numbers, because you have to need and apply one mechanism only to obtain the true numbers of mathematics-- Mathematical Induction. In Old Math they had just a tiny few intelligent mathematicians, Kronecker, who emerged from the gaggle crowd of kooks to notice that Naturals all come from one single mechanism-- Mathematical Induction. But Old Math never had a crowd of mathematicians with logical brains to say-- all our numbers need to come from the one mechanism of Mathematical Induction.
>
> 3) The true numbers of math have empty space between successor and predecessor numbers. For example the 10 Grid is 0, .1, .2, .3, . . . , 9.8, 9.9, 10.0. Where no numbers exist between .1 and .2, etc. Only discrete numbers allow us to give a proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.
>
> 4) All functions of mathematics must be a polynomial, and if not a polynomial, convert the offering to a polynomial over a specific interval.
>
> Where is that stupid thread in sci.math, poising as a puzzle problem when it had no functions only pretend functions?
>
> A few days back, 11Aug2021 appeared a stupid puzzle problem here in sci.math. Of someone pretending he had 3, 4 even 5 or 6 functions and wanting to prove equality.
>
> Then I stepped into the conversation saying he had no functions at all, until they are converted into polynomials over a specified interval, then you can do calculus on those true real functions.
>
> So, the world wide math community has got to begin to learn, no function is a function, until, and unless they are polynomials. This is an axiom of math and is proven true by the geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. You cannot have a FTC, if you have functions that are not polynomials.
>
> So there is a trade off-- does math want calculus or no calculus? If you want calculus, all your functions have to be polynomials. This has to do with the concept of discrete geometry, not a continuum, for polynomials are discrete.
>
> 5) Space is discrete and all lines in space are strings of attached straight lines.
>
> 6) No curves exist in Geometry, only finer and smaller straight line segments attached to one another.
> We can still keep the name "curve" as long as we know it is a string of fine tiny straightline segments strung together in what looks like a smooth curve. If curves exist, then the Calculus in Fundamental Theorem of Calculus cannot be proven and thus Calculus does not exist. We all know that we have to have Calculus, and so we throw out onto the trash pile the curve of Old Math. And this is reasonable because starting in 1900 in physics there arose the Quantum Mechanics of Space being discrete. And a discrete space has no continuum, has no curve of Old Math.
>
>
> 7) Space has gaps in between one point and the next point. These gaps are empty space from one point to the next point, for example in 10 Grid there is no number between .1 and .2, and in 100 Grid there exists no number between .01 and .02.
>
> 8) Limit analysis was an insane fakery in Old Math, concocted because Old Math needed the excuse of some proof, so they invented the monster con-artist trick that a limit analysis would divert the fact it is no proof at all, but a Non Sequitur argument. Limit analysis is juju totem witchcraft dance around a desire to prove the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Just as idiotic as dancing around a sick person of a virus is going to cure the person.
>
> 9) Infinity has a borderline and there is a microinfinity compared to a macroinfinity. For example in 10 Grid, the microinfinity is .1 if we exclude 0 and so there is no number smaller than .1 and no number larger than 10 in 10 Grid, where 10 is macroinfinity.
>
> 10) The 1st Quadrant Only in Coordinate System Geometry. Sad that the first coordinate system of Descartes was correct but soon became corrupted with 4 quadrants. See Mathematical Thought, Volume 1, Kline, 1972, page 303. Where Fermat then Descartes starts the Cartesian Coordinate System as 1 axis only and from 0 rightwards, meaning in our modern day math, 1st Quadrant Only. Why did math screw up on coordinate systems? I suppose some clowns thought negative numbers were true and they wanted ease of drawing a circle with center at 0. When they could have just as easily drawn the circle in 1st Quadrant Only.
>
> 11) Calculus needed a Geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, but Old Math never provided such, instead they provided some stupid Limit argument. The reason for the creation of the Limit disaster was that the French mathematician Cauchy got sick and tired of hearing his smartest students complain that the width of rectangles in the integral are 0 width, and those smart students could not, for the life of them understand how a rectangle with 0 width has any interior area. So instead of the math community denouncing the limit, instead they elevated the fakery.
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Jan 11, 2022, 1:50:22 AM (yesterday)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Alright, I caught myself in a huge mistake below. Only now did I catch myself for the sum of 0.1+0.2, +.. ,+ 0.9 +1. is not the paltry 1.45 but is the 5.5. I caught that mistake just now in figuring out the fraction summation in 100 Grid and remembering how Gauss computed that as 101 x 50 would be 50.50 which if true, and I made no further mistake would suggest that 1000 Grid would be coming further down in value than is 50.50.

This would suggest that 1000 Grid fractions would be 1001x50 = 50.050. Bringing the total down more than 100 and 10 grids as a percentage of the assumed macroinfinity of those Grids.

So if true would mean a convergence of the fractions the higher the Grid we go. But too tired to compute


> AP, King of Science, especially Physics

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Jan 11, 2022, 11:43:44 AM (15 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Alright, more mistakes until I am in the clear. The 1000 Grid would be 1001 x 500 = 500.5 and not 50.05.

When the True Numbers of mathematics are Decimal Grid numbers what we have is that the Fractions are all concentrated between 0 and 1. There is no Oresme open ended fractions to infinity. There is just a finite set of fractions.

Here is a synopsis of the first three Decimal Grid systems, 10, 100, 1000.

Decimal 10 Grid
The summation of all Fractions 0.1+0.2+..+0.9+1.0 in 10 Grid is 5.5
The summation of all numbers of 10 Grid is 101x5.0= 505.0

Decimal 100 Grid
The summation of all Fractions 0.01+0.02+..+0.99+1.0 in 100 Grid is 50.5
The summation of all numbers of 100 Grid is 10001x50.= 500050.

Decimal 1000 Grid
The summation of all Fractions 0.001+0.002+..+0.999+1.0 in 1000 Grid is 500.5
The summation of all numbers of 1000 Grid is 1000001x500.= 500000500.

Now, in the True Numbers of mathematics, the decimal Grid Numbers we do not come upon a fraction of 2/3 until about the 100 Grid with 0.66 and made more sharper in 1000 Grid with 0.666 and more sharper in 10000 Grid with 0.6666, etc.

In Old Math, they were brainwashed by Reals, where they had infinite supply (ill-defined infinity) of Fractions all the time.

So that Physicists could actually prove the Old Math mathematician was a numbskull, saying to the Old Math mathematician. Look, if you have an infinite supply of fractions all the time you violate the Conservation Laws of Physics with your fractions summing up more than infinity itself.

In New Math, we have the Fractions summed up in any Decimal Grid System as being no-more than a little over 1/2 the largest number in that system, so that 5.5 is a little over 1/2 of 10, and 50.5 is a little over 1/2 of 100, etc. So we also see that a convergence of Fractions to a little over 1/2 of the value of the largest number in that specific Decimal Grid System.

Now, this add-on to my book Mathopedia, need not be a full new book, provided and unless the recurring number sequence of 5.5 , 50.5, 500.5, .... does not show up as any Important Constant of Physics. If it shows up as a important constant of physics, then I am obliged and forced to write a whole new separate book on this topic.

In physics I would start or begin to look at the magnetic monopole of 0.5MeV. Several experiments have placed that value at 0.510 MeV.

If I can tie together the Dirac magnetic monopole of 0.510MeV with the summation of Fractions of Decimal Grid Systems, then I am forced to write a whole new book on this topic.

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Jan 11, 2022, 8:26:30 PM (6 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Now the Sigma Error of 0.51 to 0.5 is 2% and that is easily acceptable. So I will make an enter new book on the Harmonic series Oresme fakery and the AP decimal Grid Numbers convergence of all fractions in mathematics.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Jan 11, 2022, 11:18:35 PM (3 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 8:25:55 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Now the Sigma Error of 0.51 to 0.5 is 2% and that is easily acceptable. So I will make an enter new book on the Harmonic series Oresme fakery and the AP decimal Grid Numbers convergence of all fractions in mathematics.
>

Yes, I am going to make the arguement that the EM spectrum of which the magnetic monopoles of 0.5MeV are a part of, that the number 0.5MeV for Dirac magnetic monopole is a summation of fractional EM waves.

As I pointed out-- the first three Decimal Grid Systems converges to the summation of all the possible fraction values-- those between 0 and 1, including 1 itself, converges to approx, 5, 50, 500, 5000, etc etc.

For many years I was troubled in seeing where a 0.5MeV comes from for the monopole. No trouble in seeing that the muon is 105MeV and proton is 840MeV with proton+muon = 945MeV. No trouble in seeing where those number values come from.

A massive problem in seeing where 0.5MeV comes from.

But also, besides the Summation of fractional energies in the EM spectrum is the 1MeV particle, the gamma ray with 1MeV that decays in Pair Production to two 0.5MeV particles. And of course 1 is the units value. And we can see this sequence in the Decimal Grid System sequences,

10 Grid is of course 10
100 Grid is of course 100 etc

Just as the 5's sequence of summation fractions, 5, 50, 500, 5,000 etc.

These are values of physics, values in motion, but consistently forming around 1 and 0.5.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Jan 12, 2022, 12:25:51 PM (3 days ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Now this certainly should be the case of when a person has the true numbers of mathematics, that the summation of all the small numbers then the summation of all the numbers would have the very same "prefix" of 5 digit value.
What I speak of, is the idea that the microscopic world of atoms and because the Universe the macroscopic world is one big atom itself that both should have the digit value be the same-- 5 digit value. And this is the case in Decimal Grid Systems, see below.

-Decimal 10 Grid
-The summation of all Fractions 0.1+0.2+..+0.9+1.0 in 10 Grid is 5.5
-The summation of all numbers of 10 Grid is 101x5.0= 505.0

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Jan 12, 2022, 9:41:13 PM (2 days ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe

One of the most beautiful exquisite tests of the CONSISTENCY OF MATHEMATICS, rivaling the test of geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

When Old Math cannot ever do a geometry proof of FTC, because it has to throw out the Reals, has to throw out continuum, has to throw out "ill defined infinity", has to well define function as being only polynomial functions and every other type has to convert into a polynomial. Is one TEST of consistency, because without the throwing out of garbage worthless mess of Old Math, you have no calculus at all.

But now, AP has found an even far far easier test of the Inconsistency of Old Math. It comes from series and especially the fake proof of Oresme with his Reals, his ill-defined infinite, his continuum.

SECOND TEST OF CONSISTENCY OF OLD MATH SHOWING OLD MATH to be a cesspool garbage of shit. Sorry for the harsh terms but in science they are needed as a slap in the face of ignorant people brainwashed by Old Math and continue to propagandize and brain wash young students.

SECOND TEST:

The second test merely notes that a Sound and Logical and Consistent Mathematics requires the Small Numbers to summation be containing only the DIGITS that the summation of all the numbers of math has. So when we add up all the Small Numbers in any Decimal Grid System there are only two digits involved the digit 0 and the digit 5, and no others. This tells us that Reals are a cesspool bag of shit. This tells us that the Decimal Grid Numbers are the only valid logical numbers to compose mathematics.

Decimal 10 Grid

The summation of all Fractions 0.1+0.2+..+0.9+1.0 in 10 Grid is 5.5
The summation of all numbers of 10 Grid is 101x5.0= 505.0

Decimal 100 Grid
The summation of all Fractions 0.01+0.02+..+0.99+1.0 in 100 Grid is 50.5
The summation of all numbers of 100 Grid is 10001x50.= 500050.

Decimal 1000 Grid
The summation of all Fractions 0.001+0.002+..+0.999+1.0 in 1000 Grid is 500.5
The summation of all numbers of 1000 Grid is 1000001x500.= 500000500.

Now I should extend this analysis to include only the digits, 1, 0 and 5. And I have to define specifically what is meant by Small Number of a specific Decimal Grid System. A Small Number is one that exists and lies between 0 and 1 and includes 1 but not 0.

So in Old Math, those fools could never list all their numbers, never list all the numbers between any two numbers. Ask a idiot of Old Math to list all the numbers of Reals between 0 and 1 and the magnanmous fool cannot. He/she tries to get away with a list of about 6 numbers and then waves his hand as pretending that 6 suggests all the rest. Most of Old Math is what is commonly called in Logic as "hand waving".

In New Math, we define the true numbers as Decimal Grid Numbers and we define Small numbers as those that lie between 0 and 1, including 1 but not including 0.

We find that, thus, 1,0,5 are the only digits needed for sums of Small numbers, sums of all the numbers.

And this is not a coincidence that 1,5,0 are the digits needed, for to be a Consistent Mathematics demands the summation of small numbers directly related to summation of all the numbers.


Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Jan 14, 2022, 2:39:20 AM (yesterday)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Sorry, I was busy revising my FIRST LIFE = Capacitor book and could not discuss my recent magnificent discovery in math that of a 2nd Consistency Test. But now have the time to discuss it.

Old Math never had Consistency tests. There was much talk, but never any actual consistency tests.

The greatest test of Consistency in Old Math was to do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Of course there was never any valid proof of FTC in Old Math and their silly "limit analysis" is a pack of shit (sorry but that is the only way of getting attention to brainwashed math professors). Old Math never had a valid proof of FTC, they had limit analysis, analyze this analyze that, and analysis is never a proof. From Leibniz and Newton onwards, no-one had the logical brains to realize Calculus is geometry and required a geometry proof.

A limit analysis is not a proof but simply analyzing things. If I analyze a bee flying on a flower, I am not proving anything, yet this is how monsterously silly Old Math was for proving FTC. Analyzing yet not proving.

To prove geometrically FTC, requires you to throw out the Reals, to throw out the Continuum, to Modify what infinity means, to allow only Polynomial functions and no other type of function (if not polynomial, you must convert to polynomial before your piece of crap function is allowed in mathematics, to throw out all quadrants except 1st Quadrant only.

By doing all that throwing out, you thence can do a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

So that was Math's first and most spectacular Consistency Proof-- do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for it requires you to clean out the entire house of the decayed rotten Old Math.

But there was a more simple streamlined proof of the Consistency and lack thereof in Old Math. This second Consistency Proof takes a look at the Oresme obnoxious alleged proof that the Harmonic series diverges. Meaning that in Old Math, they believed fractions added up can exceed Infinity. Yes, hold your breathe before laughing. In Old Math they thought 1 + 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + .... + 1/n will exceed Infinity.

I did a book in Paleontology saying that the most ludicrous most laughable mistake that science ever endured and took serious was the sabre toothed tiger, never realizing that the teeth were from a walrus that the normal tiger preyed upon.

Was the Saber-Toothed-Tiger, Smilodon, Paleontologists most laughable mistake? // Was the 4 tusked Gomphothere the 2nd joke? Paleontology series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

But here in Old Math, I could just as easily write a book on how laughably crazy are math professors who believed that adding up 1 + 1/2 + 1/3+ .... + 1/n diverges and exceeds infinity.

Which was the worst academic idiot? The paleontologist who could not fathom the walrus tooth laying by a tiger fossil was a different animal. Or the crazy math professor lecturing how small numbers, all smaller than 1 when added up exceed infinity.

We can all see why the Paleontology wants the story of a tiger with enormous teeth because that would rake rake rake in money. But no one can see why the idiot math professor wants to teach Harmonic series sums to infinity.

In my recent posts I showed that the true numbers of mathematics are Decimal Grid Numbers and that causes there to be this.

14) Of course the Calculus geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus is a superb test of Consistency of Old Math. Testing whether the (1) numbers used are correct, (2) functions used are correct, (3) infinity correct, (4) continuum or discrete correct. Either all those elements to make a geometry proof of FTC are correct or we have to abandon calculus.

But there is a far more simple and easy measure of Consistency of Old Math numbers coming from the concept of Series addition sums. A far more easy test and it started with Oresme with a fake proof that the Series of small numbers of math, the fractions between 0 and 1 can sum up to be more than infinity itself. Imagine that for a moment, small numbers eclipsing the value of infinity. It defies imagination much like saying you can get energy from a vacuum to run a electric motor in physics.

What went wrong here is that Reals were never the true numbers of mathematics and Old Math had a screwed-up understanding of infinity, for Old Math never had a borderline between what is infinite and what is finite.

One of the most beautiful exquisite tests of the Consistency of Mathematics, rivaling the test of geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

When Old Math cannot ever do a geometry proof of FTC, because it has to throw out the Reals, has to throw out continuum, has to throw out "ill defined infinity", has to well define function as being only polynomial functions and every other type of so-called-function has to convert into a polynomial first before it is a function. Is one test of consistency, because without the throwing out of garbage worthless mess of Old Math, you have no calculus at all.

But now, AP has found an even far far easier test of the Inconsistency of Old Math. It comes from series and especially the fake proof by Oresme with his Reals, his ill-defined infinite, his continuum.

Second test of Consistency of Old Math showing Old Math to be a cesspool garbage. Sorry for the harsh terms but in science they are needed as a slap in the face of ignorant people brainwashed by Old Math and continue to propagandize and brain wash young students.

Second Test:

The second test merely notes that a Sound and Logical and Consistent Mathematics requires the Small Numbers to summation be containing only the DIGITS that the summation of all the numbers of math has. So when we add up all the Small Numbers in any Decimal Grid System there are only two digits involved for an answer, the digit 0 and the digit 5, and no others. Indicating that the Small Numbers are directly related to the sum total of all numbers. This tells us that Reals are a cesspool. This tells us that the Decimal Grid Numbers are the only valid logical numbers to compose mathematics.

Decimal 10 Grid
The summation of all Fractions 0.1+0.2+..+0.9+1.0 in 10 Grid is 5.5
The summation of all numbers of 10 Grid is 101x5.0= 505.0

Decimal 100 Grid
The summation of all Fractions 0.01+0.02+..+0.99+1.0 in 100 Grid is 50.5
The summation of all numbers of 100 Grid is 10001x50.= 500050.

Decimal 1000 Grid
The summation of all Fractions 0.001+0.002+..+0.999+1.0 in 1000 Grid is 500.5
The summation of all numbers of 1000 Grid is 1000001x500.= 500000500.

Now I should extend this analysis to include only the digits, 1, 0 and 5. And I have to define specifically what is meant by Small Number of a specific Decimal Grid System. A Small Number is one that exists and lies between 0 and 1 and includes 1 but not 0.

So in Old Math, they could never list all their numbers, never list all the numbers between any two numbers. Ask a fool of Old Math to list all the numbers of Reals between 0 and 1 and the magnanimous fool cannot. He/she tries to get away with a list of about 6 numbers and then waves his hand as pretending that 6 suggests all the rest. Most of Old Math is what is commonly called in Logic as "hand waving".

In New Math, we define the true numbers as Decimal Grid Numbers and we define Small numbers as those that lie between 0 and 1, including 1 but not including 0.

We find that, thus, 1,0,5 are the only digits needed for sums of Small numbers, sums of all the numbers.

And this is not a coincidence that 1,5,0 are the digits needed, for to be a Consistent Mathematics demands the summation of small numbers directly related to summation of all the numbers.

AP is exploring the fact that the rest energy of the Dirac magnetic monopole of 0.5MeV, what Old Physics thought was the electron of atoms, but turns out the muon is the true electron of atoms at 105MeV rest mass. So this idea of the Series sum of all fractions is always of a form value involving just digits 5 and 0 is investigated further.


Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Jan 14, 2022, 1:51:06 PM (yesterday)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Alright, far far more on this CONSISTENCY Test of Old Math and Old Math really stinks for you have to throw out Reals, continuum, their dumb and stupid notion of infinity, their -- everything qualifies as a function (only polynomials are functions in true math) their mindless negative numbers and 4 quadrants when only 1st Quadrant exists.

So in Old Math, no-one is able to do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Simply impossible with all the fakery and junk and errors of Old Math. You have to clean out all the trash of Old Math before you can even get started on a geometry proof of FTC.

And Old Math felt the symptoms of their nauseous and banal corruption of the truth of mathematics, for they had to come up with some form of proof of FTC, seeing that they could not have a geometry proof. So what happened, in the 1800s a Frenchman named Cauchy invented the obnoxious and worthless Limit Analysis, preaching that making an analysis is the same as proving FTC. And only the people who take mathematics for "getting a grade" but never learning the truth of calculus buy into that nonsense of a Limit analysis.

For the smart students of math realized almost immediately that Cauchy's obnoxious and error filled limit analysis was saying that a rectangle of 0 width has interior area, defying what we all know that 0 times anything is still 0. For Old Math calculus was summing up rectangles -- all of which were 0 width.

But, but, there is a Geometry proof of FTC provided we clean up many errors of Old Math. One of those huge errors is this notion of the Reals as Numbers, for they are a collection bag of hobbled and cobbled together trash for numbers. You can never tell how many fractions exist between 0 and 1, and Oresme came up with a thoroughly obnoxious error filled proof (fakery spelled in capital letters) Oresme thought he proved that if you add up just the Harmonic series 1+1/2 + 1/3 + ... +1/n+.... That this series of smallest of the numbers on the number line, that Oresme and all later borne mathematicians thought they proved that these small numbers add up to larger than infinity itself. I mean, talk about dunce idiots of mathematics. We all thought the idiots of physics were ones who proclaimed that they could power their electric car from the electricity of a battery out of a lemon. Well, here in mathematics, math professors believe that the Tiny numbers of math add up to more than infinity.

But AP shows us that Decimal Grid Numbers are the true numbers of mathematics and in the first three decimal Grid Systems which is a proof by math induction that the smallest numbers when added up equal a tiny tiny bit more than a value of half of infinity for in 10 Grid 10 is the borderline to infinity and the sum of fractions is 5.5, about halfway.

Decimal 10 Grid
The summation of all Fractions 0.1+0.2+..+0.9+1.0 in 10 Grid is 5.5
The summation of all numbers of 10 Grid is 101x5.0= 505.0

Decimal 100 Grid
The summation of all Fractions 0.01+0.02+..+0.99+1.0 in 100 Grid is 50.5
The summation of all numbers of 100 Grid is 10001x50.= 500050.

Decimal 1000 Grid
The summation of all Fractions 0.001+0.002+..+0.999+1.0 in 1000 Grid is 500.5
The summation of all numbers of 1000 Grid is 1000001x500.= 500000500.

SO THIS TEST OF TRUE MATHEMATICS NUMBERS, is a test that reveals, the total sum of fractions, smallest numbers must be directly related to the total sum of numbers in a Decimal Grid System. Notice the fractions have only the digits 5 and 0 as well as the Total Sum of numbers in a specific Grid System. That is the DIRECT RELATIONSHIP, the mirror image. that the Sum of Fractions reflects the Sum of all the Numbers, for both have only digits of 5 and 0.

But today I want to talk more about the Consistency of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and combined with this Test of summation of Series of Fractions. I want to combine the two tests of Consistency.

In the Geometry proof of FTC, we are required a Midpoint between intervals, so for 10 Decimal Grid System we have these numbers to contend with. We are required of the midpoints for that is how the Derivative is constructed geometrically by reforming the rectangle in the interval at its midpoint and lifting up the right-triangle whose vertex is where the derivative lands on.

0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25, 0.3, . . . 0.9, 0.95, 1.0, 1.05, 1.1, ...... 10

Now, those midpoints of intervals do not exist in 10 Grid, no, they exist in 100 Grid, the next higher level Grid System.

But, if we are doing Calculus and using 10 Grid, we are forced to borrow from the 100 grid those midpoints.

If we deal only with 10 Grid strictly, our Series sum is exactly 5.5.

But, now if we add up all the midpoints we have another value of 5.0 exactly

And if we add 5.5 with 5.0 we get a number that is beyond the last finite number in Decimal 10 Grid. We get 10.5, an infinity number within the 10 Grid.

We find that all the other Decimal Grid Systems when summing their Midpoints in Intervals add up to Half of the value of the Grid System working in.

Now this requires careful interpretation, very careful interpretation. If the sum had been 10 outright for 10 Grid and not 10.5, the interpretation would have been immediate, that the sum of the smallest numbers and their midpoint add up to the largest finite number of that Grid system. Unfortunately it adds up to a tiny bit more. Of course we we get to the 10^604 Grid, the summation of fractions and midpoint CONVERGES to the largest finite number of that Grid System.

So in 10 Grid, there is the ominious sum of 10.5 but in 10^604 Grid the summ is virtually the same as the number 1*10^604 itself as we see that tiny dribble spill leftover of a "5 digit".

What I am saying here, is that the TRUE NUMBERS OF MATHEMATICS have to mirror reflect its smallest numbers with the total set of numbers. Reals cannot do any of this because Reals are a "bag of shit".


Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
1:04 AM (18 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
On Friday, January 14, 2022 at 1:38:26 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Alright, far far more on this CONSISTENCY Test of Old Math and Old Math really stinks for you have to throw out Reals, continuum, their dumb and stupid notion of infinity, their -- everything qualifies as a function (only polynomials are functions in true math) their mindless negative numbers and 4 quadrants when only 1st Quadrant exists.
>
> So in Old Math, no-one is able to do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Simply impossible with all the fakery and junk and errors of Old Math. You have to clean out all the trash of Old Math before you can even get started on a geometry proof of FTC.
>
> And Old Math felt the symptoms of their nauseous and banal corruption of the truth of mathematics, for they had to come up with some form of proof of FTC, seeing that they could not have a geometry proof. So what happened, in the 1800s a Frenchman named Cauchy invented the obnoxious and worthless Limit Analysis, preaching that making an analysis is the same as proving FTC. And only the people who take mathematics for "getting a grade" but never learning the truth of calculus buy into that nonsense of a Limit analysis.
>
> For the smart students of math realized almost immediately that Cauchy's obnoxious and error filled limit analysis was saying that a rectangle of 0 width has interior area, defying what we all know that 0 times anything is still 0.
>
> But, but, there is a Geometry proof of FTC provided we clean up many errors of Old Math. One of those huge errors is this notion of the Reals as Numbers, for they are a collection bag of hobbled and cobbled together trash for numbers. You can never tell how many fractions exist between 0 and 1, and Oresme came up with a thoroughly obnoxious error filled proof (fakery spelled in capital letters) Oresme thought he proved that if you add up just the Harmonic series 1+1/2 + 1/3 + ... +1/n+.... That this series of smallest of the numbers on the number line, that Oresme and all later borne mathematicians thought they proved that these small numbers add up to larger than infinity itself. I mean, talk about dunce idiots of mathematics.
>
> But AP shows us that Decimal Grid Numbers are the true numbers of mathematics and in the first three decimal Grid Systems which is a proof by math induction that the smallest numbers when added up equal a tiny tiny bit more than a value of half of infinity for in 10 Grid 10 is the borderline to infinity and the sum of fractions is 5.5, about halfway.
> Decimal 10 Grid
> The summation of all Fractions 0.1+0.2+..+0.9+1.0 in 10 Grid is 5.5
> The summation of all numbers of 10 Grid is 101x5.0= 505.0
>
> Decimal 100 Grid
> The summation of all Fractions 0.01+0.02+..+0.99+1.0 in 100 Grid is 50.5
> The summation of all numbers of 100 Grid is 10001x50.= 500050.
>
> Decimal 1000 Grid
> The summation of all Fractions 0.001+0.002+..+0.999+1.0 in 1000 Grid is 500.5
> The summation of all numbers of 1000 Grid is 1000001x500.= 500000500.

I am slow to interpret this of Summation of Small Numbers with Midpoints.

It would be a easy interpretation if the sum were to equal the last finite number in value but for 10 Grid that sum is 10.5, for 100 Grid that sum is 100.5, for 1000 Grid that sum is 1000.5, for 10^604 Grid that sum is ---- add on a 0.5.

In this sense we can say the Sum of Fractions plus Midpoints is the value of the largest finite number plus tack on a 0.5.

Now I been thinking on this all day long, on and off. And one idea is that a 0.5, is the starting midpoint of the First Infinity Number Interval. Here I have flashbacks to the 1990s where I wasted so much time on P-adics. But here, perhaps, this 0.5 tack on is somehow the first number for Infinite Numbers, sort of like the P-adics going around in a circle, a circuit and coming to -2 which is 9999... 9998 then -1 which is 9999.....99999 and finally 0 and then 0.5 for a new p-adic circuit. Of course, in new true mathematics p-adics and negative numbers are nonexistent.

Anyway, if I fail to make any better of an explanation or interpretation than this, I still have succeeded in showing that the Reals are fake numbers because they are impossible to relate their small numbers with their total numbers.

Decimal Grid System as the true numbers of mathematics, directly relates all the numbers between 0 and 1 and the final largest finite number in that specific Grid System.

And, the most interesting part of this story is a direct link up to physics and the Dirac magnetic monopole of 0.5MeV, of course the gamma ray of 1MeV that in Pair production creates the positron and the antipositron (careful, it is not the electron, for that is the muon).


Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
7:04 PM (now)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
I am going to push this book up as being my 169th published book of Science, for I have enough material already to publish. So instead of being 228th, it now becomes 169th.

And the title should be 3 TESTS of Consistency of Mathematics (1) calculus (2) harmonic series (3) valid functions.


Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Jan 15, 2022, 7:44:38 PM (5 days ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Alright, I discussed in length the primal greatest consistency test of Old Math-- was-- can it give a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?? And the resounding answer was-- not unless you throw out the Reals, all functions but polynomials, all numbers except for Decimal Grid Numbers, throw out continuum and its stupid silly limit analysis, throw out all negative numbers and all quadrants except for 1st Quadrant Only, throw out the silly nondefinition of infinity.

My, a lot of throwing out of trash of Old Math.

Then a second consistency test arises in Old Math having to do with the Oresme fakery of a harmonic series diverges. Imagine the ludicrousness of thinking very small tiny numbers can exceed infinity. The resolution of Series of small numbers is obtained by noting that the True numbers in mathematics are the Decimal Grid Numbers. And once you accept these as the true numbers of mathematics, you no longer have the absurd result of Small Numbers added up exceeds infinity.

Now I need a 3rd Test of Consistency of Old Math. A test involving what are valid functions. Throughout Old Math, we see a history of utter lousy logic applied or worse yet, no logic at all. In the history of mathematics, shows a pattern of "acceptance of everything that comes down the road" and never a logical interrogation. Never a test of logic as can be seen by the numbers in Old Math, for even as late as the 20th century we have con-artists with "new silly and stupid numbers" the surreals. And the whole of the numbers of Old Math were a hobgoblin collection of bags of numbers-- junk numbers all accepted and tossed into a huge pile called Reals, and as if that was not good enough to collect trash, they invented complex and p-adics and more.

Where the truth be known, math had only one set of true numbers all along-- Decimal Grid Numbers.

So in this third test of Old Math we examine up close the polynomial functions. And compare them to all the other functions.

Comparing is a form of Consistency testing.

And we quickly note something hugely, hugely important about polynomial functions. Something I learned in college freshman calculus at Univ Cincinnati in 1968. Something I marveled at, and something I held dear, even to this day.

For when you take calculus and doing the derivative or the integral, there is one function and one function type only that is supereasy to solve. Supereasy to solve over all other functions. (And this so much reminds me now of how I solved the unification of the 4 forces of physics-- pick out the one force that is the most perfect force, and then the other 3 forces have to be a form of that perfect force-- the EM force)

Here in math calculus, there is one form of function that is a perfect form for its derivative and integral all follow a simple Power Rule. And once you learned the Power Rule, you never have any trouble with derivative or integral.

So, well, the polynomial functions are the easiest functions as a class of functions to do calculus. This implies that all other functions are likely to be fake functions, until they are turned into polynomials over a prescribed interval.

And there is another beautiful feature of polynomial functions. They are such that you can take a few coordinate points on a graph and turn them into a polynomial function called the Lagrange transform.

Now we ask, do any other class of functions have a transform to turn all other different types of function into this type? The answer is no. Only the polynomial functions have a built in feature of turning any other function into a polynomial.

And now, finally, we have to ask, is the Polynomial function the only valid function and what is its relationship to the Decimal Grid Numbers?


Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Jan 15, 2022, 9:48:18 PM (5 days ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
So here now, I have not dug deep into whether the Polynomials as functions, the only valid functions is intimately related to Decimal Grid Numbers with their holes and gaps in between one number and the next number. A straight line in 1st Quadrant Only is a polynomial function and does a straight line need and require discrete numbers?

I have not proven that, but I have proven the geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. With that proof of FTC, then I can safely say, that Polynomial functions require a Discrete Number System.

And I should not have been the only mathematician in the world in 1968 to notice the ease with which polynomials did all of calculus. That if we threw onto the trashpile every function except polynomials, the world of mathematics would be a thousand times better off. I should have not been the only mathematician to see the absolute ease with which polynomials glide through calculus. And this is alarming because the entire rest of the math community was making mathematics a higher and higher trash pile. As the teenager saying goes of math professors PhD, piled higher and deeper.

The ease, utter utter ease of derivative and integral of a polynomial function, yet only AP notices this in 1968. And the utter agony of doing derivatives or integrals of so called other functions that are not polynomials.

And again, the fact that their is a Transform, the Lagrange transform of turning any coordinate points into a polynomial function, yet nothing for other types of functions, should have been clear to everyone in math who does math as a career, that something is peculiar with polynomials as being special. So special they are the only Valid Functions.

AP

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Jan 16, 2022, 3:17:31 PM (5 days ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Let us make it 4 TESTS of consistency, and this is likely to be the easiest test, even far more easy than that of harmonic series testing of consistency. Because in this test we simply note that 3rd dimension covers all of geometry. There is no 4th dimension or higher.

This test covers the need for Calculus to be 1st Quadrant Only, and no 4 quadrants in 2nd dimension, with no negative numbers. Of course the delusional Complex numbers with Imaginary numbers are the furthest reach into insanity. And then we note that Imaginary and Complex and negative numbers stupidity and insanity could have all be staved off if Old Math had simply realized a Axiom of Algebra that they missed-- YOU CAN NEVER HAVE A VALID EQUATION OF MATHEMATICS UNLESS THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE EQUATION HAS A POSITIVE NONZERO NUMBER THERE, ALL ALONE, AT ALL TIMES.

If Old Math had realized this is a crucial axiom of algebra, then much of what inflicts Old Math with its terminal diseased culture of phoniness, would have been abated.

The insanity of 4th dimension and higher even spilled over into physics with their multi dimensions, where even some goon clod physicists believe in a 11th dimension.


Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Jan 17, 2022, 1:31:49 AM (4 days ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Now I believe strongly there is this 4th test of Consistency that you can have only 3 dimensions.

And I suspect there is a direct proof out of the 6 EM laws of physics (what was formerly called the Maxwell Equations, only corrected of its many errors).

A direct proof that you cannot have a Faraday law of physics if you had 4th dimension. Something on those lines.

This is not the first time I thought of proving 3rd dimension is the last dimension, for years ago I have been wondering about this. Maybe now I can actually prove it.

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Jan 17, 2022, 2:11:33 AM (4 days ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe

Yes, I did solve it years ago, and even included it in several of my books on physics.

It is not the Faraday law or Ampere-Maxwell law or Coulomb law or but is rather the New Ohm's law the Voltage = current x magnetic field x electric field.

That is an equation of V = iBE and is a equation of volume in math. To say there is a 4th dimension is tantamount to saying that Volume does not capture all the volume of a prescribed region. That there is something more in geometry than volume, which is not true.

Only I am afraid, dumb people cannot buy that argument. Dumb people want something they cannot understand and hear it from other dumb people that it is true. Take for example Godel's or Cantor's nonsense in logic or math or Hawking's nonsense of black holes or Einstein's nonsense of General Relativity, for dumb people accept that wholeheartedly because they cannot understand it, and hear everyone around them saying-- it is true.

AP

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Jan 18, 2022, 1:58:52 AM (3 days ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Alright, now I am fully working on completing this book. It started as 2 tests of consistency of Old Math, (1) a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (2) Oresme's Harmonic Series that diverges when it should to any common sense reasonable mind converge.

But I added on two more Consistency challenges to Old Math--- 3rd test-- the polynomial function is the only valid function in mathematics.

And yet a 4th test-- 3rd dimension has to be the last dimension, otherwise Volume in Old Math is no longer all encompassing of Space. Oh, yes, I know, kooks in physics thought of "curled up dimensions" but even here, requires volume. So if you want 4th or higher dimension, you destroy volume of geometry.


Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Jan 18, 2022, 1:32:31 PM (3 days ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
I decided to place this book in my logic section, rather than mathematics. Mathematicians are far too dumb to correct their field of knowledge, so dumb are they, that they do not require any formal course in logic to learn how to think straight and clear, instead, they can go through college and earn a degree in pure math without ever having to study logic formally.

And this lack of training in Logical Thought-- how to think straight and clear is evident in math history from Leibniz and Newton onwards. That no-one in mathematics realized a slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse for a single cone has but 1 axis of Symmetry yet a ellipse to be created from a sectioning requires 2 axes of symmetry such as a cylinder slant cut.

This utter inability to think straight and clear is evident in the entire mathematics community of 2022, where not a single one of these oafs of mathematics is willing to acknowledge the slant cut of single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse, Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Ken Ribet, Jill Pipher. Not a single one of them is worth 10 cents in mathematics for not a single one of them has any abilities in Logic-- think straight and think clearly.

And so this book needs to go in the Logic section of AP's science book portfolio.

For the opposite of Logical Reasoning prevailed from Leibniz and Newton's invention of the Calculus around 1670 until AP cleans up Mathematics by 1991-2022 as the writing of this book. No-one in mathematics could think straight and clear that a single cone has 1 axis of symmetry and could never possibly give a ellipse which requires 2 axes of symmetry. And so the opposite of Logical Thought occurred in mathematics history-- the cobbling together of all sorts of junk and silly and stupid ideas, cobbled together into one huge rucksack called mathematics. AP calls it Old Math, for it is mathematics bereft and barren of logical reasoning.

This was the Method of Old Math-- anyone with junk and fake math was accepted into the inner circles of mathematics and this junk and failed and crazy math offerings were accepted and made Old Math, more of a waste dump site than a science of precision. Take a look at Old Math's numbers system, for they cobbled together the Naturals, then tacked on Rationals, then tacked on Irrationals, and not satisfied yet with the garbage collection, they tacked on imaginary numbers and extended it to Complex numbers, and even yet the sewage that was Old Math numbers was not yet satisfied for they took aim at Surreal garbage and P-adics garbage, and then finally along comes AP and says, the only true numbers in mathematics-- all those numbers have to come from a principle of Mathematical Induction, just like the Naturals are produced by mathematical induction. Of course, Old Math was not all losers and fools and idiots of mathematics for there was a Dr. Kronecker who stood up and said-- Naturals were made by God and all the other (crazy numbers) were manmade-- or words to that effect.

But the way Old Math created the Reals, their cesspool collection of numbers is symptomatic of how Old Math treated all subjects of mathematics--- allow everything, because no-one in Old Math had a logical brain of reasoning. No-one in Old Math was forced to train in formal logic. No-one in Old Math understood Logical Thought and Logical Reasoning. And this is proven by Boole and Jevons who in the late 1800s established formal logic but tragically, their system was all error ridden and outright crazy with their 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND connector being subtraction. Yet of course no-one in the mathematics community could ever even spot this tragic error of Boole logic, for mathematics was braindead towards logic. In mathematics history from Leibniz and Newton to AP, the mode of operation was Memorization and Add-on to the mountain of errors. No-one had a sharp logical mind from Newton to AP. Just the reverse where Cauchy tries to invent the Limit Concept to justify rectangles of 0 width, possessing interior positive area for integral. No-one from Leibniz and Newton to AP had a logical brain worth more than 10 cents. Not even those in Logic, had a Logical brain for we see that Cantor and Russell and Whitehead, Turing and Godel doing the Tack and Add on more garbage to the mountainous cesspool sewage that Old Math had become. For if one asks-- Cantor, Russell, Whitehead, Godel were comfortable and happy with Boole logic of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. So stupid were they-- Cantor, Russell, Whitehead, Turing, Godel in logic that they not only could not see slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse, but so stupid in logic that they bought into the mindless idiocy of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction as the foundation of their logical thought and used the mindless 2 OR 1 =3 in all their math proofs.

Even today the foolish math idiots of Wiles, Hales, Tao, Pipher, Ribet, Stillwell think in terms of Boole logic of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.

So, what AP is going to do with his new book of Mathematics Consistency, is place it in the section of Logic. For Old Math was one huge colossal failure of thinking straight, thinking clear.

As Kronecker noted that Naturals were made by God and all the rest by humanity. AP in correcting Old Math, found that All the True Numbers of Mathematics should be like the Naturals,-- made by God. And that is what the Decimal Grid Number System is all about-- for every number is created by Mathematical Induction.

And only the Decimal Grid Numbers can do a geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.


Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Jan 19, 2022, 12:39:09 AM (2 days ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe

While watching the Usenet newsgroup of sci.math, a group I have followed ever since late 1993, I saw a post about Oresme's so called proof that the Harmonic Series diverges to infinity. The Harmonic series is 1 + 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 + . . . + 1/n.....

Now most people when they come upon this series and its so called or alleged proof of divergence by Oresme in 1350, when they come upon this information for the first time in their studies, are usually set aghast in bewilderment, that the summation of ever tinier fractions when added up, is going to exceed beyond infinity itself. It is like in physics where some charlatan is entertaining us with a gadget that puts out more energy than put into the gadget.

But then no-one from Leibniz and Newton onwards to AP had a good mind of logical reasoning to put a stop to this nonsense of Harmonic series diverging to infinity.

In the case of Oresme, his so called proof is an error of logical reasoning for he reasoned that

1 + (1/2) + (1/4 + 1/4) + (1/8 + 1/8 + 1/8 + 1/8) +....

can be converted to this

1 + 1/2 + 1/2 + 1/2 +1/2 +.... where Oresme concluded that goes to infinity.

Can the reader spot the horrible mistake Oresme and all mathematicians after Oresme made in that argument and its conclusion?

It is a delightful and lovely mistake that a person with Logical brains should find it easy to uncover.

So Oresme argued that he could rearrange the terms in the series and by rearranging that he could generate a sum of all terms after 1 be that of 1/2 (or, even greater than 1/2, but Oresme was satisfied with just using 1/2. For example in rearranging you add 1/3 with 1/4, but Oresme was satisfied with just 1/4+1/4. Same goes for (1/8+1/8+1/8+1/8) where Oresme could have used (1/5+1/6+1/7+1/8). But Oresme was satisfied with just all being 1/8. And with Oresme's poor understanding of what Infinity means-- for the truth of the matter, infinity has a borderline, but no-one in mathematics realized that infinity has a borderline until AP discovered the infinity borderline using Huygens tractrix. If you define infinity as a borderline of 1*10^604 then you have the truth of the Harmonic series. That the addition of fractions is far far less than 1*10^604, for there are only 1*10^604 terms in every series. And since the only number with value equal to 1 is the first term in the Harmonic series and all the other terms are far far less than 1 especially 1/(10^604). Means the Harmonic series converges to a finite number somewhere between 1 and 1*10^604.

This is the problem in mathematics education, in that earning a degree in mathematics to become a professor of mathematics requires no courses or training in formal logic. Logic is the science that helps you think straight and think clear. But in modern day education, a mathematics major in schools is not required to take logic. And thus, in the opinion of AP, most math professors are zombies in logical thought. And not a ghost of a chance that mathematicians from Leibniz and Newton to AP would get the correct understanding of the Harmonic series.

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Jan 19, 2022, 2:05:37 PM (2 days ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe

Most students of mathematics who have not yet had their logical brain destroyed by a Old Math professor can read the below and figure out the silly mistake Oresme made-- for what Oresme did in his fake proof was allow the "terms of the harmonic series to be unbounded, while stifling the terms in the Truly Infinite Standard Series of Measure of 1+1+1+...... You see, the crux of Oresme's con art fakery is that he allows 1+1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 +........ He allows that series to have far far far more terms than he allows 1+1+1+1+..... to have terms. And thus, a con-art fake is born into mathematics and math education as mindless math professors bought into that magician trick of fakery. Which reminds me of the con-art fake in 1973. This is where Geller claimed to bend spoons from this brain waves. And Johnny Carson was himself a magician and invited Geller spoon bending on his show but knowing what the deception and fakery was of Geller, and throughout the show Geller was unable to perform his magic trick act.

But in the case of Oresme, the delusion or optical illusion is quite plain to see-- Oresme allows more terms for his fractions of Harmonic series than he allows for integer terms of 1 for infinity. Oresme's mistake and all the Old Math Professors after Oresme is their Dis-Comparison, they compare more terms for 1/2, 1/3,.... than they compare with 1,1,....

It is sad and silly that Old Math was full of con-art magic tricks than ever the truth of mathematics.

And it is sad and silly that math was hoodwinked, yet no physicist was hoodwinked by spoon bending. At least, spoon bending was never taught in physics classrooms.

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Jan 20, 2022, 3:03:57 PM (yesterday)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
First let me remark, that it is a blessing to write so many books of science for one just feeds off the other once you write 169 books of science. For example, just recently I wrote the book that dispels the myth that the cheetah was the fastest land animal on Earth, by proving the racehorse is the fastest land animal on Earth. You are never going to get a cheetah to run what Secretariat ran the 2.4km in 1.59 minutes, and that is with a weight of a jockey on Secretariat's back, not included in that ultimate speed of a racehorse compared to cheetah.

Anyway this book of 169th on science is about Consistency in Mathematics and one item of consistency is the fallacy of Old Math with their dimensions exceeding 3rd. For in truth, the 3rd dimension is the last and final dimension. And the easy Proof of Consistency is that of Volume, for if you had 4th or higher dimension, then your formula of Volume cannot be V= LWH, but must have an additional term beyond length, width, height. In other words, 4th dimension causes Volume to be wrong as LWH.

But, today, I have another stunning proof other than using volume but using calculus of Speed and Acceleration, just like the racehorse Secretariat. By the way I read some more on Secretariat and some people say he had 4 times the heart that a average racehorse has and another web site saying he had 2X the heart size. I have no way of untangling which is the more accurate.

So, now, it is indubitable that Speed equals meter/second and that acceleration equals meters/seconds^2.

If you look at the cover picture of my book on racehorses you see that Secretariat had the largest angle of a stride at 110degrees.

So in physics we can say that Speed is Stride divided by Time.

In physics we can say that in running we have a concept of 1/second^2 as a internal electric motor of the speed at which you through your forleg out and your hindleg pushing forward. So that 1/second^2 is a motor rotor.

I wrote another book explaining Angular Momentum and another book explaining what is 3rd Dimensional Calculus.

Here is where I can tie in all those books of science in explaining that 3rd Dimension has to be the last and final dimension of science or math.

To say that there is a 4th dimension would be saying there is something beyond acceleration. That there is more math beyond acceleration.


Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Jan 20, 2022, 3:33:07 PM (yesterday)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
So what we have here is extremely fascinating and extremely important, because we all can see the derivative in 2 dimensional calculus is dy/dx.

And here is an opportunity for the first time to see Derivative in 3rd dimension where the motor rotor of a 1/second^2 is involved with the dy/dx of 2nd dimension. The motor rotor of a Distance/ motor rotor is acceleration.

So we see the 2nd dimension calculus of purely dy/dx.

But now we can see the 3rd dimension calculus-- acceleration --- as the dy/motor rotor.

In one of my books I explain 3rd dimensional calculus as being in fact the Faraday Law. But now, today, I can tie into that with acceleration is dy/motor rotor.

And the way we see or view this is our own running or the running of Secretariat. The dy for Secretariat is his 110degree forleg to hindleg-- the stride in the run. But now we have a 1/seconds^2 and that is what is called by me the motor rotor. Do we have a fast 1/sec^2 a fast motor rotor or do we have a slow motor rotor.

I myself as a runner knows I have a very fast motor rotor, the energy I can burst forth with throwing my legs out on a run. However, I lack a huge stride. If I had a huge stride along with my motor rotor, I would have in my youth probably won a Olympic medal in racing. But because I have a short stride, means I was never Olympic material.

So in running, there are two dynamics at play, there is the stride-- how far apart can you throw your front leg to hind leg, and Secretariat was champion of that with 110 degrees separation. But the other dynamic is how fast that internal motor of the runner is going, how fast or rpm's or motor rotor is the runner producing. And in Secretariat with his heart so much larger than the average race horse could have a high high rpm. And that is the reason Secretariat won the triple crown in his last of 3 races beating the field by 31 lengths. When you put a racehorse with a 110 degree stride and a motor rotor of Secretariat, he is going to win by 31 lengths.

And the point in all of this, is that just like Volume is all consuming of a measure of Space. So is Acceleration all consuming of calculus Derivative in 3rd dimension. There cannot be a 4th dimension for it destroys geometry. Which in proofs of Math Consistency, means geometry has contradictions if inconsistent. A 4th dimension causes geometry to be inconsistent.

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Jan 20, 2022, 7:08:16 PM (24 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Physics had a concept for 1/seconds and called it frequency and called it rpm revolutions per minute (or seconds).

But physics had no concept for 1/seconds^2.

Sure, 1/sec^2 is the derivative of 1/sec, but physics had no developed concept for 1/sec^2 and no term for it.

So let me name 1/seconds^2 as being motor-rotor. The motor-rotor is the rate of change of 1/sec. This rate of change is 1/seconds times 1/seconds equals 1/seconds^2. Since rpm is in minutes we include 60 seconds in a minute and so the Motor-Rotor is rpm times rpm, also new to physics.

In Running whether human or racehorse there are two components, the stride is 1st component and the motor-rotor is the 2nd component. The stride is throwing your legs forward. The motor-rotor is a measure of the body to keep on throwing the legs forward. The fastest runners have a large stride and have a fast rotation of motor, some would call this the pace. So that if you as a runner can throw your legs 2 times against another runner with the same stride who throws his legs once to your 2 times, then your legs are faster than the other runner for you will have covered 2 times the distance.

There are four kinds of runners:
1) short stride and slow motor-rotor
2) long stride but slow motor-rotor
3) short stride and fast motor-rotor
4) long stride and fast motor-rotor

Someone running in place is short stride and fast motor-rotor. Olympic champions want as long a stride as possible hooked up to a fastest possible motor-rotor.

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
3:56 PM (3 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Now yesterday I defined a brand new concept of both math and physics in that of 1/seconds^2. Of course, Old Math and Old Physics defined Frequency for that of 1/seconds, but they were too stupid to define 1/seconds^2. I defined it as Motor-Rotor as the rate of change of rps, revolutions per second.

This is extremely important for both math and physics because it is the 3rd dimension calculus. Being dunces in Old Math and Old Physics, they never had a 3rd dimensional calculus. With their 2 dimension dumb minds, they could not even go from their 2nd dimension calculus to where AP is at now,-- 3rd dimension calculus.

So yesterday I defined the concept of Motor-Rotor which is dy/(dx^2) the 2nd derivative of 1/seconds. And this is a concept, a phenomenon we easily recognize in Runners and Racehorses. In running the Stride- the throwing out of legs in the next step forward is the dy of calculus, and the repeating of stride is the frequency the 1/seconds. But now, we have 3rd dimension calculus and here we have the Stride , but we also have the math of Repeating-that-Stride involved in what I call the Motor-Rotor, of 1/seconds^2. We can think of it as the body energy in rotating the Stride legs to repeat another new stride.

So if we have a Runner like Secretariat with a Stride of 110degree angle from forleg to hindleg, which is the largest stride recorded in horse racing and if we couple that stride with a huge Motor Rotor-- the ability to repeat that throwing of stride, then you have a champion racehorse.

But today I am going to talk about the numerator of dy/dx which is speed. And instead of squaring the denominator for acceleration as dy/(dx^2) I am going to square the numerator of dy/dx and have (dy^2)/dx. And many of those in physics already knows what that is, for it is angular momentum.

So in the dumb and silly and stupid Old Math and Old Physics that had only 2nd dimension calculus. New Math and New Physics has 3rd Dimension Calculus with its (dy^2)/dx and its dy/(dx^2).

In 3rd Dimension Calculus I need not define dy^2 as it is meters^2 and we all know what meters squared is that of area. But it gives us greater insight into a concept that no-one in Old Physics ever mastered-- angular momentum, for every physicist of the 1900s never understood angular momentum, absolutely not a single physicist of the 1900s had a understanding worth more than 10 cents of what is angular momentum. And the proof of this is that everyone in the 1900s saw the 0.5MeV particle flying around a 938MeV proton at over 99% the speed of light. There is no angular momentum in that for the 0.5MeV particle would immediately fly off. There is angular momentum when we take the Muon as the true real electron of atoms, but it still is moving at too fast a speed to be bound to a proton. So we have to realize and understand that the Muon of 105MeV is stuck inside a proton torus of 840MeV. Being stuck inside so that the 8 rings of the proton hold and bound the Muon inside and doing the Faraday Law with the proton torus, gives Angular Momentum.


y

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Jan 25, 2022, 3:00:26 AM1/25/22

to

forgib me imm sik i cry--F.Crim,James Kibo Parry,S.Panchanathan,Brian Stone,James S.Olvestad,Dorothy Aronson publishing in AMS journal along with Ken Ribet and Jill Pipher their apologies for teaching the mindless conclusion that the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse for in truth it is a Oval, because a single cone has but one axis of symmetry. To get a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry such as a cylinder. And that these math professors of AMS are begging the students to forgive them for their mindless math idiocy.

>
>
> Cambridge Math Dept
> Alan Baker, Bela Bollobas, Darwin Smith, John Coates, Timothy Gowers, Peter Johnstone, Imre Leader, Gabriel Paternain
> 
>
> TerenceTao,AndrewWiles, Thomas Hales, Jill Pipher, Ken Ribet, John Stillwell need to go to their affiliated University student newspaper and publish their apology for teaching the brainwashed propaganda that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is in fact a Oval, never the ellipse, for a single cone has only 1 axis of symmetry.
> >
> > Because they were failures in ever recognizing a slant cut in single cone is a oval, meant they were failures all their life long in mathematics, never realizing that Calculus was geometry, and the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus required a geometry proof, not their mindless dumb and stupid limit-analysis.
> >
> >
> > AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >

> > Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
> >

> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled

> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > •
> > •
> >
> >
> > #11-2, 11th published book
> >
> > World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.

> > Preface:
> > Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
> >

> > Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.

> >
> > To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
> >
> > Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
> >
> >

> > Product details
> > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
> > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
> > Language ‏ : ‎ English

> > File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB

> > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

> > Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
> > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

> > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > #134 in Calculus (Books)
> > #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >

> > #11-3, 24th published book
> >
> > World's First Proof of Kepler Packing Problem KPP // Math proof series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > There has been a alleged proof of KPP by Thomas Hales, but his is a fakery because he does not define what infinity actually means, for it means a borderline between finite and infinite numbers. Thus, KPP was never going to be proven until a well-defined infinity borderline was addressed within the proof. And because infinity has a borderline means that in free space with no borderlines to tackle and contend with, the 12 kissing point density that is the hexagonal close packed is the maximum density. But the truth and reality of Kepler Packing is asking for maximum packing out to infinity. That means you have to contend and fight with the packing of identical spheres up against a wall or border. And so, in tackling that wall, we can shift the hexagonal closed pack to another type of packing, a hybrid type of packing in order to get "maximum packing". So no proof ever of KPP is going to happen unless the proof tackles a infinity border wall. In free-space, a far distance away from a wall barrier of infinity border, then, hexagonal closed pack reigns and is the packing in all of free space-- but, the moment the packing gets nearby the walls of infinity border, then, we re-arrange the hexagonal closed pack to fit in more spheres. Not unlike us packing a suitcase and then rearranging to fit in more.
> >
> > Cover picture: is a container and so the closed packing must be modified once the border is nearly reached to maximize the number of spheres.
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07NMV8NQQ
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 20, 2019
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1241 KB

> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 60 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> >
> > #11-4, 28th published book
> >
> > World's First Valid Proof of 4 Color Mapping Problem// Math proof series, book 4 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Now in the math literature it is alleged that Appel & Haken proved this conjecture that 4 colors are sufficient to color all planar maps such that no two adjacent countries have the same color. Appel & Haken's fake proof was a computer proof and it is fake because their method is Indirect Nonexistence method. Unfortunately in the time of Appel & Haken few in mathematics had a firm grip on true Logic, where they did not even know that Boole's logic is fakery with his 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = 1, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 depending on which is subtracted. But the grave error in logic of Appel & Haken is their use of a utterly fake method of proof-- indirect nonexistence (see my textbook on Reductio Ad Absurdum). Wiles with his alleged proof of Fermat's Last Theorem is another indirect nonexistence as well as Hales's fake proof of Kepler Packing is indirect nonexistence.
> > Appel & Haken were in a time period when computers used in mathematics was a novelty, and instead of focusing on whether their proof was sound, everyone was dazzled not with the logic argument but the fact of using computers to generate a proof. And of course big big money was attached to this event and so, math is stuck with a fake proof of 4-Color-Mapping. And so, AP starting in around 1993, eventually gives the World's first valid proof of 4-Color-Mapping. Sorry, no computer fanfare, but just strict logical and sound argument.
> >
> > Cover picture: Shows four countries colored yellow, red, green, purple and all four are mutually adjacent. And where the Purple colored country is landlocked, so that if it were considered that a 5th color is needed, that 5th color should be purple, hence, 4 colors are sufficient.
> >
> > Product details
> > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PZ2Y5RV
> > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 23, 2019
> > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > File size ‏ : ‎ 1183 KB

> > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

> > Print length ‏ : ‎ 34 pages
> > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> >
> > #11-5, 6th published book
> >
> > World's First Valid Proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem, 1993 & 2014 // Math proof series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Last revision was 29Apr2021. This is AP's 6th published book.
> >
> > Preface:
> > Real proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem// including the fake Euler proof in exp3 and Wiles fake proof.
> >
> > Recap summary: In 1993 I proved Fermat's Last Theorem with a pure algebra proof, arguing that because of the special number 4 where 2 + 2 = 2^2 = 2*2 = 4 that this special feature of a unique number 4, allows for there to exist solutions to A^2 + B^2 = C^2. That the number 4 is a basis vector allowing more solutions to exist in exponent 2. But since there is no number with N+N+N = N*N*N that exists, there cannot be a solution in exp3 and the same argument for higher exponents. In 2014, I went and proved Generalized FLT by using "condensed rectangles". Once I had proven Generalized, then Regular FLT comes out of that proof as a simple corollary. So I had two proofs of Regular FLT, pure algebra and a corollary from Generalized FLT. Then recently in 2019, I sought to find a pure algebra proof of Generalized FLT, and I believe I accomplished that also by showing solutions to Generalized FLT also come from the special number 4 where 2 + 2 = 2^2 = 2*2 = 4. Amazing how so much math comes from the specialness of 4, where I argue that a Vector Space of multiplication provides the Generalized FLT of A^x + B^y = C^z.
> >
> > Cover Picture: In my own handwriting, some Generalized Fermat's Last Theorem type of equations.
> >
> > As for the Euler exponent 3 invalid proof and the Wiles invalid FLT, both are missing a proof of the case of all three A,B,C are evens (see in the text).
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQKGW4M
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2019
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1503 KB

> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 156 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> >
> > #11-6, 19th published book
> >
> > World's First Proof of Collatz Conjecture// Math proof series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Last revision was 20Aug2021. This is AP's 19th published book.
> >
> > Preface: Old Math's Collatz conjecture, 1937, was this: If you land on an even number, you divide by 2 until you come to an odd number. If you come to or land on an odd number, you do a 3N+1 then proceed further. The conjecture then says that no matter what number you start with, it ends up being 1.
> >
> > What the Collatz proof of math tells us, is that so very often mathematicians pose a conjecture in which their initial formulation of the conjecture is murky, obfuscation and poorly designed statement. Such poorly designed statements can never be proven true or false. An example that comes to mind of another poorly designed conjecture is the No Odd Perfect Conjecture, in which the statement is obfuscation of factors. So for the odd number 9, is it 1+3, or is it 1+ 3 + 3. So when a mathematics conjecture is full of obfuscation and error in the statement, then these type of conjectures never have a proof. And takes a person with a logical mind to fix and straighten out the conjecture statement and then provide a proof, thereof.
> >
> > Cover picture: when I think of Collatz, I think of a slide, a slide down and so my French curve is the best slide I can think of, other than a slide-ruler, but a slide ruler is slide across.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PS98K5H
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 16, 2019
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1955 KB

> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 61 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Best Sellers Rank: #212,131 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #4 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > ◦ #9 in Number Theory (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #32 in Number Theory (Books)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > #11-7, 20th published book
> > World's First Proofs that No Perfect Cuboid Exists// Math proof series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Someone on the Internet posed the unproven No Perfect Cuboid, and so I took up the challenge. I am usually a sucker for geometry riddles, more so than number theory. So I obliged. Then by 2014 I proved the matter and looking back at it now in 2019, I really really do not see what all the fuss was about-- that it was not that hard not hard at all. You just have to look carefully at sets of 4 right triangles and find an Impossibility Construction, why you cannot have those 4 right triangles all with positive integer numbers for their 3 sides. But the proof method is so hugely important in math-- impossibility of construction. And, please, do not confuse that method with Reductio Ad Absurdum, for RAA is not a valid proof method in mathematics (see my logic book on RAA). But, the method of Impossible Construction, although it might look like RAA, is totally different and fully valid in all aspects.
> >
> > But now, in hindsight in March 2019, writing this up, I see a very close connection of No Perfect Cuboid to that of Generalized Fermat's Last Theorem with its equation of A^x + B^y = C^z and the way I proved Generalized FLT was with "condensed rectangles" and the No Perfect Cuboid is a 3rd Dimension object but it is 4 rectangles of 4 right triangles we inspect. And we can pursue that connection between Generalized FLT and No Perfect Cuboid further, but not now.
> >
> > Cover Picture: Is that of 4 rectangular boxes, 2 of which are cubes sitting atop a book page of the Cubic Set for the Transuranium Atoms, from the textbook "The Elements Beyond Uranium" , Seaborg, Loveland, 1990. I am always looking for connections.
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PMZQNNT
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 16, 2019
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1382 KB

> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 61 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > #11-8, 21st published book
> >
> > World's First Proofs of Mathematics Oldest Unsolved Problems: No Odd Perfect and Finiteness of Perfect Numbers // Math proof series, book 8 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Last revision was 26Apr2021. And this is AP's 21st published book.
> >
> > Preface: Now my history with these proofs goes back to 1991 to 1993, and have been finessing the proofs ever since. Some math proofs just nag nag and nag you. They just cannot be settled still. Their proof is a tiny tiny sliver of impossibility that is easily overlooked. Like an optical illusion that you are mislead into, or like those pictures where you look at it one way and you see a young lady and another way you see a very old lady.
> >
> > Now the No Odd Perfect Number is not a important proof in mathematics but mostly a spectacle for it does not teach much beyond making proper correct definitions. And murky definitions is what held a proof of No Odd Perfect, other than 1, held it back. The murky definition of factors, do we include 1 or not include, for example the odd number 9, do we include 3 twice or once for that we have 1* 9 and we have 3*3 and Old Math looked at that as 1 + 3, whereas I would look at that as 1 + 3 + 3. So when you have messy definitions, murky and messy, of course no proof will be found in over 2,000 years.
> >
> > Cover Picture: Shows our modern day new reality of the situation where the definition of "perfect" was a Ancient Greek idea, steeped in murky messy idea of factors and when to add factors, that no longer is suitable for mathematics.
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PN1CPRP
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 16, 2019
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1534 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled

> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 28 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> >
> >
> > #11-9, 15th published book
> >
> > World's First Proofs of Infinitude of Twin-Primes, and Polignac Proved // Math proof series, book 9 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Circa 1991-1993, I gave an Old Math style of proof for the Infinitude of Twin Primes, modeling my proof as to a Euclid Infinitude of Primes Proof. But then came year 2009 when I found the way to make Infinity concept well-defined. Up until 2009, no-one in the world had a clear precise definition or understanding of what "infinity" was or what it means. It means a borderline between finite and infinite and the way to find this borderline is to use the Tractrix when the unit-tractrix area catches up with the area inside a unit circle is the infinity borderline and it happens to be when pi digits have three zeroes in a row, does the tractrix area equal the circle area-- hence, we reached infinity border and beyond are infinite numbers, no longer finite numbers. What that discovery does for proofs of infinitude is change all those proofs dramatically. And here in Twin-Primes and Polignac I show the reader how modern day New Math proves infinitude of any set of numbers.
> >
> >
> > Cover Picture: Is a picture of the first five twin-primes.
> >
> > Product details
> > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PMY1YWB
> > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 15, 2019
> > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > File size ‏ : ‎ 1642 KB

> > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

> > Print length ‏ : ‎ 9 pages
> > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> >
> > #11-10, 16th published book
> >
> > World's First Proofs of Goldbach, Legendre, Staircase Conjectures// Math proof series, book 10 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > AP proved the Goldbach Conjecture starting 1993 where the Algebra Columns is the bedrock-key of the proof involved. The Algebra Column Array is the tool and no-one was going to prove Goldbach unless they had that tool, which the 2014 post of mine makes the array tool crystal clear. So starting 1993, I posted to sci.math about Array or Algebra Column which as a tool would render all proofs of this nature. The Goldbach conjecture historically dates back to 1742, and the Legendre conjecture dates 1752-1833. The Staircase conjecture is a wholly new conjecture proposed by AP circa 2016.
> >
> > Cover: Is a Algebra Column Array sequence starting with 6 Array and then 8 Array.
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PS6MR48
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 15, 2019
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1740 KB

> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 36 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #148,852 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > #4 in Number Theory (Kindle Store)
> > #38 in Number Theory (Books)
> > #7 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> >  
> >
> > #11-11, 25th published book
> >
> > Disproof of Riemann Hypothesis // Math proof series, book 11 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Last revision was 31Oct2021. This is AP's 25th book of science.
> >
> > Preface: The Riemann Hypothesis was a conjecture never able to be proven and for good reason, for it was the last symptom of a rampant disease inside of mathematics. Old Math did not have the true numbers that compose mathematics. Old Math had a rag-tag ugly collection of fake numbers with their Reals, their Negative numbers compounded with Rationals compounded with Irrationals and then adding on the Imaginary. These are fake numbers, when the true numbers of mathematics are the Decimal Grid Numbers. Because Old Math uses fake numbers, is the reason that Riemann Hypothesis just languished, languished and languished. You cannot prove something riddled in fakery. Below I demonstrate why having fake numbers in math, creates fake proofs, fake theorems, and creates a conjecture that can never be proven.
> >
> > Cover picture: Riemann Hypothesis deals with fake numbers of mathematics. When what is needed is the true numbers-- Decimal Grid Numbers. We learn Decimal Grid Numbers when very young, when just toddlers, wood counting blocks. All the true numbers of mathematics come from Mathematical Induction-- counting. Mathematical Induction is utterly absent in the Riemann Hypothesis, when it should be central to the hypothesis.
> > Length: 58 pages
> >
> > Product details
> > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PVDS1RC
> > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 20, 2019
> > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > File size ‏ : ‎ 1475 KB

> > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

> > Print length ‏ : ‎ 58 pages
> > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Best Sellers Rank: #5,118,638 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #643 in Number Theory (Kindle Store)
> > ◦ #1,398 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > ◦ #3,559 in Number Theory (Books)
> >  
> > #11-12, 152nd published book
> > The 6th Regular Polyhedron-- hexagonal faces at infinity// Math proof series, book 12

> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition
> >

> > Last revision was 10Dec2021. And this is AP's 152nd published book of science.
> > Preface: This is my 152nd book of science an exciting book, and it came out of the clear blue. The writing of it took a mere week's time and it is a byproduct of my 151st book of science, TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 1st year College. Although my 151st book took me over a year to write; this book took just 1 week to write. Difference being that of a textbook versus that of a book on a specific topic, is 50 times more difficult because a textbook takes so much time in organizing, order, and fitting together pieces of each chapter in fact, whereas a single topic science book is like writing a prose story and is 50 times easier to write than a textbook.
> > While I was doing 151st, I noticed and emphasized that all of physics is determined by 6 laws of physics, and the first principle of physics is All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. Then we notice that 6 laws cover all of physics, 6 laws of electricity and magnetism. We notice that all of logic and math is covered by 6 operators. And then we look at geometry's regular polyhedrons and find there are only 5 known regular polyhedron with a proof in Old Math that a 6th Regular Polyhedron cannot exist. An actual proof in Old Math that a 6th cannot exist.
> > Well, AP knows better. For AP knows that if all of Physics is written in the language of just 6 laws and all of logic and mathematics are covered by 6 operators. That AP knows Old Math made a mistake in thinking they proved 5 regular polyhedron were all that exist as regular polyhedron. So Old Math made some or several mistakes in their so called proof that 5 and only 5 regular polyhedron exist, and that is what this book covers, the 6th regular polyhedron of the world, what it is, and what it looks like.
> > Warning: the entire book is written from a sequential dated notebook, so if you read something early on, I may have changed my mind on the idea near the end. This is not a textbook, but a notebook of discovery and read it for its history.
> > Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of a soccer ball of 20 hexagons, 12 pentagons; and a glass ball covered by netting of tiny hexagons. Both objects I use in experiments of proving the 6th Regular Polyhedron.
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09K4PWKVK
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 21, 2021
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 839 KB

> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled

> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 76 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> >
> > #11-13, 160th published book
> >
> > MATHOPEDIA-- List of 76 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >

> > Preface:
> > A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.
> >
> > The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.
> >
> > The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.
> >
> > Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.
> >

> > I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds question of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09MZTLRL5
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2021
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1147 KB

> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 62 pages


Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Jan 30, 2022, 1:31:19 AM1/30/22

to

CIA 30 year stalker Kibo Parry Moron shits in face David S. Cohen, NSF Panchanathan, William J.Burns, Cindy Marten
On Tuesday, January 25, 2022 at 2:53:45 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"psychoceramic"
> "bozo"
> tarded:
> The letters in CIA, rearranged, spell "Child Manure
> Soup Time".

Re: 2- Kibo says psychoceramic Cindy Marten,Dr.Panchanathan, Miguel Cardona,David S. Cohen, William J.Burns with their ellipse conic section when it is a oval, their 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction and never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem.

---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993

Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Jan 30, 2022, 5:55:24 PM1/30/22

to

Kibo Parry Moron writes Germany should do more
Re: Russia's dumb agenda-- reacquire lost lands// China's dumb agenda-- reacquire Taiwan and other lost lands// When the only real agenda for all of humanity-- Colonize Europa, and this means no war but working together, for all humanity perishes in Sun
11 views

Michael Moroney's profile photo
Michael Moroney
Jan 29, 2022, 5:12:47 PM (24 hours ago)

Kibo Parry Moron suggests Germany get off its dead arse and ship 1,000 missiles & 5,000 troops to Ukraine where the missiles can reach Moscow and Kremlin should Russia invade Ukraine
On Saturday, January 29, 2022 at 5:12:47 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"tard"

> fails at math and science:
>

Kibo, is that to counterbalance the Russian Iskander missiles amassed on the border???????

Kibo shits on NSF Panchanathan fake electron and shits on Sheldon Glashow fake electron, David S. Cohen, William J.Burns, Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow
On Saturday, January 29, 2022 at 5:12:47 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>Physics "tard"

> fails at math and science:

>Drag Queen of Science, especially Physics

Just hours after Kibo Parry Moron gets inducted into the CIA, he blows his cover (I guess the insanity of stalking for Kibo is so overpowering that he cannot help himself.

Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster

On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:
> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >

Perhaps Kibo holds the world record in a CIA operative blowing his cover, in a matter of hours.

2Kibo Parry M can Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall, Lene Hau ask the question, which is the atom's real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. Or is Kibo Parry M too worried about his newly invented word of "analbuttfuckmanure" that Kibo invented in 2017-18 and has continued to use right through 2021 calling AP that word since AP does science while Kibo never does science, only stalker hate spew.

On Sunday, December 5, 2021 at 6:12:36 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> fails at math and science:

Kibo Parry M can Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall, Lene Hau ask the question, which is the atom's real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. Or is Kibo Parry M too worried about his newly invented word of "analbuttfuckmanure" that Kibo invented in 2017-18 and has continued to use right through 2021 calling AP that word since AP does science while Kibo never does science, only stalker hate spew. Kibo you called MIT your invented word of 2017, are you going to call Harvard that also. And you called Dartmouth and Stanford your invented new word. I guess Harvard is special for you Kibo Parry, nonstop stalker, insane kook of 28 years.

On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 10:48:29 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"AnalButtfuckManure"

On Monday, November 15, 2021 at 9:40:52 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"AnalButtfuckManure"

On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 at 7:38:34 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Court Jester of Physics"

> fails at math and science:

Kibo, why did you invent that word in 2017-18 and why do you still use it today in 2021, is it because you failed science and now you want to curse those that succeed???

Kibo the failure of science with his 938 is 12% short of 945, loves reading AP's science book for what he missed in science. Kibo's favorite AP book is

Research Notebook: Earth has perhaps 1-10 million years, before it is broiled by the Sun RED GIANT phase// consequence of starshine is Faraday law, not fusion// Astronomy series, book 1

by Archimedes Plutonium

Last revision was 18Feb2021. This is AP's 128th published book of science.
Preface: This is a research notebook, meaning the entire book is an ongoing research program and many unanswered questions need a full answer, chief among those questions is whether we have 1-10 million years rush exit of Earth, or we have the more comfortable 140 million years gradual exit. As of August 2020, I have the fact that the Sun has gone into a Red Giant phase, I have that as a _certainty fact_ due to the Sun and Stars shine from Faraday Law, not from fusion. A certainty fact because all cosmic bodies double in their number of atoms every 140 million years time elapse. So that our Sun is in a Red Giant phase as of 2020, starting Red Giant phase and this phase initiation causes the amount of UV radiation by the Sun to increase steadily and steadily. I have the fact from NASA that the yearly increase in Solar Radiation is 0.005%. Such a yearly increase in radiation, especially UV radiation, regardless of the Ozone protection, regardless of the ozone and its hole, that such a yearly increase will see drastic deaths in Insect populations. The Ozone layer of protection can no longer protect us from a 0.005% steady yearly increase. There is research news that even blue visible light is deadly to small organisms. Small size animals will be the first big noticeable hit in a Red Giant phase. And even larger size animals such as birds, songbirds exposed to a increasing blue light visible and ultraviolet will destroy their eyes and seeing ability. And now we have the SCIENCE 24APR2020 report on its cover "Insect Decline". Where Earths Insect biomass is on a rapid decline 25% biomass per decade. With that rapid of a decline, it is not too many years that entire ecosystems start to decline as well, the plants, for the plants need insects.

What this research notebook is unable to ascertain at the moment, is whether Earth will become like Venus as non-liveable in 1 to 10 million years, or whether we have a more comfortable exit from Earth as 140 million years to do something about the inevitable Sun going Red Giant. A 25% decline of Insects in the last decade is news that indicates, strongly indicates we have just 1 to 10 million years to make Mars-Europa-Pluto our new home. I hate to see that if that is true, because I know 10 million years is a short time to do something of a total evacuation of planet Earth and try to live upon Mars-Europa-Pluto. Such a mass exodus sounds more like a horror story.

But all the science books prior to this book, were saying humanity has around 4 billion years to begin to contemplate a Sun going Red Giant phase. No, this book says Earth is like Venus in the next 140 million years, and possibly like Venus in just 1 to 10 million years. So where the 4 billion years -- no-one really cared about Red Giant phase, if that is truly 1-10 million years. Then, that science becomes number 1 science in every person alive. If we do not get out to Mars-Europa-Pluto in time, there will be no more humanity, and gone extinct. And funny, and ironic, that the average life span of any organism-species on Earth as found in the fossil record, is, you guessed it, 1 to 10 million years on average. There is something tantalizingly curious about the numbers 1 to 10 million years as the average life span of any species until it becomes extinct.

Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of that SCIENCE "Insect Decline" and also my computer with the recent report of a 30% loss of all wild birds in North America.

--------------------------
Table of Contents
--------------------------

1) Carson's environment chemical poisoning, Hansen's global warming, now AP's Red Giant phase.

2) Reports of massive wild bird declines, 30% in the past 50 years in North America from 1970-2019.

3) Reports of massive Insect declines, 25% per decade worldwide from 2010-2020.

4) Connecting the fact that Faraday Law, not fusion as the power source of all Stars, our Sun, in fact all matter, implies our Sun has initiated its Red Giant phase.

5) NASA's number of 0.005% yearly increase in Solar Radiation.

6) Pulsars are advanced intelligent life evicted from their home planet and living in colonies with a pulsar electric grid system.

7) Tesla's wish come true-- electricity in Space without wires. Is this advanced alien life and we see it as pulsars?

8) Monitoring Earth for increasing signs of mass death of plants and animals and microbes, due to increasing Solar Radiation as NASA's number 0.005% increases.

9) How will humanity get off of Earth and harbor safely in Mars-Europa-Pluto?

10) Theory fallout that we have to evacuate Earth.

11) New news from the Parker Solar Probe.

12) Evolutionary sequence of stars goes from normal to High-Frequency star (neutron) to Red Giant.

13) Hertzsprung-Russell diagram revised by AP.

14) The only reliable universal distance measure in all of astronomy is light intensity.

15) Humanity's need for a Electric Magnetic propulsion system for spacecrafts.

16) Listing the characteristics of potential astro-bodies for colonization.

17) Last vestiges of humanity and life on Earth, living in greenhouses on the far side of Jovian moons.

18) Ongoing commentary.


Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Feb 2, 2022, 5:21:27 PM2/2/22

to

David S. Cohen needs to publish in Yale student newspaper that he has stopped his water drip torture by agent Kibo Parry Moron brainwashing High School and College students that 938 is 12% short of 945 and that slant cut in single cone is ellipse when in truth it is a Oval.

William J. Burns needs to publish in Oxford St.John's College that he has stopped brainwash torture of young students with his slant cut in single cone is ellipse when in truth it is a oval. See his harsh torture of students by his blown-the-cover agent Kibo Parry Moron.

CIA William J. Burns & NSF Dr Panchanathan & Dr. Terence Tao need to apologize in their respective college student newspapers for teaching and aiding Fake Math-- ellipse a slant cut in single cone is fake-- for that is the Oval.
7k views

William J. Burns needs to publish in Oxford St.John's College that he has stopped brainwash torture of young students with his slant cut in single cone is ellipse when in truth it is a oval. See his harsh torture of students by his blown-the-cover agent Kibo Parry Moron below.

Dr. Panchanathan needs to publish in the Univ Ottawa student newspaper that he stopped teaching fake math of 938 is 12% short of 945, and that a slant cut in single cone is not a ellipse.

Guiness book recordholder of blown cover agent Kibo Parry Moron, of 2minutes upon sworn in --

Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---

Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster

>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >

Here is Kibo torture of young students in High School and College with his fanatical ellipse water torture:

On Monday, June 15, 2020 at 1:13:27 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Here you are!
> Below you will find a simple *proof* that shows that certain conic
> sections are ellipses.
>
> Some preliminaries:
>
> Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
> in the proof:
>
> ^ x
> |
> -+- < xh

> .' | `.
> . | .
> | | |
> ' | '

> `. | .'
> y <----------+ < x0
> Cone (side view):
> .
> /|\
> / | \
> /b | \
> /---+---' < x h
> / |' \
> / ' | \
> / ' | \
> x 0 > '-------+-------\
> / a | \
>
> Proof:
>
> r(x) a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence
>
> y(x)^2 r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.
>
> Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 1 ...equation of an ellipse
>
> qed

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

They also need to apologize in that newspaper article for teaching their mindless Oresme Harmonic series diverges to infinity. For here is a simple proof that the Harmonic Series converges to a finite number.

1+1/2+1/3+ 1/4+..... + 1/n

1+1+1+1+ .....+ 1_n

As anyone with at least a one marble brain can see, the infinite series of adding 1 is always bigger than the Harmonic series sum. So, it always converges any series whose terms are smaller than 1.

Sobriquet & Dr. Terence Tao need to apologize in their respective college student newspapers for teaching and aiding Fake Math-- ellipse a slant cut in single cone is fake-- for that is the Oval.

Why Tao,Wiles,Pipher,Stillwell, Ribet,Hales failed geometry-- too stupid to even spot and recognize slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse. Reason, they never understood Logic on how to think straight & clear.
5k views

When you ask Tao,Wiles,Pipher,Stillwell, Ribet,Hales how on Earth do they get a slant cut in single cone to be a ellipse which has 2 axes of symmetry yet the single cone has but 1 axis of symmetry. Ask them how they get a ellipse? The only conclusion one can draw is that Tao is a failure of logic, that Wiles is a failure of logic, that Pipher is a failure of logic, that Stillwell is a failure of logic, that Ribet is a failure of logic, and Hales another failure of logic. None can think straight nor can think clear. Yet all of them awarded in mathematics for their mindless mathematics.

Even a High School student has more intelligence in geometry than those 6 listed. For a High School student can demonstrate a single cone with 1 axis of symmetry and a Oval with 1 axis of symmetry match one another, but not the ellipse.

Why Tao,Wiles,Pipher,Stillwell, Ribet,Hales failed geometry-- too stupid to even spot and recognize slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse. Reason, they never understood Logic on how to think straight & clear. And this also indicates to us that all the rest of the math offered by the listed 6 is nothing more than "garbage math, garbage thoughts."

3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
•
•

Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 26Jan2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.

Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.

In November of 2019, I was challenged to make the definition of Oval a well defined definition. I took up that task, and fortunately I waited a long time since, 2016, my discovery that the oval was the slant cut into a cone, not the ellipse. I say fortunately because you need physics in order to make a well defined definition of oval. You need the knowledge of physics, that electricity is perpendicular to magnetism and this perpendicularity is crucial in a well defined definition of oval. When I discovered the ellipse was never a conic in 2016, I probably could not have well defined the oval at that time, because I needed the 3 years intervening to catch up on a lot of physics, but by November 2019, I was ready willing and able. Then in August of 2020, I discovered a third new proof of Ellipse is a cylinder section never a conic section, using solid 3rd dimension geometry of ovoid and ellipsoid.

Cover picture is a cone and a cylinder on a cutting board and that is an appropriate base to place those two figures because sectioning means cutting, and the cuts we want to make into a single cone and a cylinder is a slant cut not a cut parallel to the base of the figures, nor a cut that leaves the figure open ended but a slant cut that leaves the figure a closed loop.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 2021 KB
• Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled

• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

• Print length ‏ : ‎ 50 pages

• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#11-2, 11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:

Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.

To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)



Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Feb 4, 2022, 3:39:00 PM2/4/22

to

Re: Psychoceramic NSF Dr. Panchanathan,F. Fleming Crim, kibo Parry M says will corrupt the minds of your children! Why kibo? Because they still teach 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction and ellipse a conic when it never was.

Mostowski Collapse's profile photo
Mostowski Collapse
1:33 AM (13 hours ago)

Ha Ha psychoceramics, more defined than Dan-O-Matiks same-ness in DC poop.
Mostowski Collapse's profile photo
Mostowski Collapse
1:49 AM (13 hours ago)

Why is Dan-O-Matik even posting on sci.math. Years ago people posted long formalizations here on sci.

Kibo Parry Moron, can Dr. Panchanathan publish his apology in France Cordova's Purdue Univ student newspaper along with Dr. Cordova that they see the light of day and truth about the slant cut in single cone is the OVAL, never the ellipse. There are truckers blocking Canada's Univ of Ottawa.


Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.

To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)



Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.

To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

Kibo Parry Moron of CIA fame said it best in his gay debutante ball post in the NSF Panchanathan Gala Party featuring Kibo spelling bee on words like Kibo's 2017 invention of "analbuttfuckmanure". And his cookbook of "Analbuttfuckmanure burgers". Courtesy of Nick Thompson's Wired magazine of Kibo "almost god" cover picture and Wikipedia entry of mindless cretins of Wikipedia.

Kibo Parry Moron blowing his cover with the CIA in 1997

Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster

On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:

> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >

> >http://www.netscum.net/fieldsm0.html
> What the hell is this? As if it's not bad enough that we have a fake
> Mao Zhedong here, now we have a fake kibo too?
> Is there a fake xibo and a ~ibo to round out the trinity?
> --scott
> --
> "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

> Oh you need to see the ellipse-is-a-conic-section proof again? Here you go!

>
>
> Some preliminaries:
>
> Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
> in the proof:
>
> ^ x
> |

> -+- <= x=h

> .' | `.
> . | .
> | | |
> ' | '
> `. | .'

> y <----------+ <= x=0

>
> Cone (side view):
> .
> /|\
> / | \
> /b | \

> /---+---' <= x = h
> / |' \
> / ' | \
> / ' | \
> x = 0 => '-------+-------\
> / a | \
>
> Proof:
>
> r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence
>
> y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.
>
> Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1 ...equation of an ellipse
>
> qed
>

Re: ...although Kibo _universally regarded_ as having more physics intelligence in his shit streaked underwear than in the entire brain of Todd B Smith - Earle Jones's Stanford's math and physics dept combined
by Adolpho the Sarcastic Rooftop Monkey
Apr 10, 2021, 3:20:20 PM

Re: fuckdog boston's Kibo Parry Moroney subhuman *stalkers* Betsy DeVos, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, barry shein's world std paying how much to stalk AP? Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, ,,,,
by Hewitt Buettner
Oct 10, 2020, 2:55:48 PM

Re: Spamming fuckdog Kibo Parry Moroney says fire Stanford's Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian rather than let them brainwash o
by
Richard Cranium
Jan 24, 2021, 3:01:28 PM

Re: 1Kibo Parry Moroney says Analbuttfuckmanure MIT, William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter...
by Hoofington P. McSnort Aug 26, 2020, 6:58:48 PM

Re: Kibo Parry M on Cynthia Barnhart and why MIT is a propaganda camp not a school of higher education.
by Michael Moroney Jun 27, 2021, 3:49 PM

Moroney says autism // Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins//never realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
3/4/18
By Michael Moroney

Re: Autism..says Moroney //Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner//realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
by
Michael Moroney Feb 26, 2018, 11:29:08 PM

Re: Vincent Meunier,Donald Schwendeman, Rensselaer Polytechnic, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek,kibo Moroney Parry is the reason RPI failed ellipse is like Kibo fails with 938 is 12% short of 945
by Allen Walker Apr 13, 2019, 2:04:32 PM

Cornell a sicko school? Re: Cornell Univ like Christensen, an education parasite //with their 3 OR 2= 5 while their 3 AND 2 = 1, embracing the contradiction Either..Or..Or..Both
by Michael Moroney Jan 18, 2019, 4:59:49 PM

Re: Drs.Benedict Gross, Joseph Harris of Harvard, are you as dumb as Moroney never realizing the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV,monopole=.5MeV // 12 proofs below
by Michael Moroney Jan 2, 2018, 11:15:07 AM

Re: Drs.Hugh Woodin,Horng-Tzer Yau of Harvard, never a Picture of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus//are you as dumb as Moroney//your students deserve better
by Michael Moroney Dec 29, 2017, 9:04:44 AM

Re: chemistry cannot exist with electron 0.5 to 938 MeV Re: Drs.Thomas Rosenbaum John Schwarz Kip Thorne of CalTech/never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, 0.5MeV = Dirac monopole
by Michael Moroney Jan 25, 2018, 11:36:09 AM

Re: Drs.David Cobden Victor Cook John Cramer of Univ Wash. are you as dumb as Jeff Relf, _...@__.__//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = monopole
by Michael Moroney Jan 14, 2018, 3:19:12 PM

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney on failed physicist Steven Weinberg who cannot entertain the question of which is the real electron of atoms-- is it the muon or the 0.5MeV particle?
by Michael Moroney May 29, 2021, 9:02:21 AM

Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work

by Michael Moroney Oct 28, 2017, 11:55:50 PM

Re: the most stupid poster of logic in sci.math for decade-- Dan Christensen, that insane Canadian stalker
by Michael Moroney Dec 24, 2017, 1:15:41 AM

Re: Jeff Relf, Seattle offtopic shithead spammer says Democrats value tortured South Korean Moon Bears at trillions of dollars, while Republicans rather have rats than Moon Bears
By Michael Moroney May 10, 2021

Re: South Korea frees Moon Bears, due to Ayaz apology. Glory to God Almighty, South Korea finally freeing their tortured Moon Bears
I happened to see a video of a moon bear that was freed from a bile farm (in Vietnam). Nice to see,
By Michael Moroney May 9, 2021, 9:48 PM

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney pink slips Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall, Lene Hau,Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe //cannot tell apart muon = real electron and 0.5MeV Dirac monopole...
by Eldridge Art Carpenter Apr 2, 2021, 6:24 AM

Re: fuckdog boston's Kibo Parry Moroney subhuman *stalkers* Betsy DeVos, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, barry shein's world std paying how much to stalk AP? Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, ,,,,
by Hewitt Buettner

Re: Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, kill// Dan Christensen, Uncle Al, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, Dept Educ Betsy DeVos, John Baez, Port563 Gilbert Strang, Barry Shein
by Hewitt Buettner

Re: 1---Kibo Parry Moroney asks, did we ally ourselves correctly in Korea, for it is South Korea that is behaving like a savage evil barbarians to Moon Bears
by Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says// Dr. Lawrence Bacow, can Harvard stop the Kibo Parry Moroney from his constant insane drumbeat of .... "I ate my brain" ... flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
by Fred Glover

Re: Spamming fuckdog Kibo Parry Moroney says fire Stanford's Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian rather than let them brainwash
by Richard Cranium Jan 24, 2021, 3:01:28 PM

Re: Moon Bear contents of Samsung and Hyundai? Is it true kibo Parry Moroney & Nicholas Thompson are investigating how much tortured moon-bear parts are installed in Samsung & Hyundai equipment??
by Herp Derpington

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says "Oh Mum! Ride-A-Penis Cult!" Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne, CalTech's Thomas Rosenbaum with their 10 OR 6 = 16; their ellipse a conic when it never was; their proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth it is 840 to..
by Eddie "Fish Basket" Reynolds Jr.

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Drs. Block, Dr. Block, Griffiths, Miller, Suzuki, Lewontin, Gelbart with their meiosis going from 46 to 92, wanting to get to 23; as failures of math and "nude sluts". Is it any worse than Kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945?
by Professor Wordsmith

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney paid stalker, NSF Betsy DeVos dept of educ says fails at science Drs. Block, Griffiths, Miller, Suzuki, Lewontin, Gelbart with their meiosis going from 46 to 92, wanting to get to 23; as failures of math "Mouse Dimple Cunt Hair"...
by Herp Derpington

Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test
By Michael Moroney 37 posts 427 views updated 2:04 PM

Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
1/23/18
By Michael Moroney

Re: unpaid AP doing the world's finest logic, while Cambridge, Stanford, Harvard, Yale, Princeton teach dunce Logic
10/28/17
By Michael Moroney

Re: MIT's Dr.Martin Bazant, Harvard's Dr.Dennis Gaitsgory-- time you take your full responsibilities as science educator and deal with science failures Michael Moroney
8 posts by 2 authors
12/4/17
By Michael Moroney

Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
20 posts by 3 authors
By Michael Moroney

Re: 8Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS

20 posts by 2 authors
4/9/18
By Michael Moroney

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Lisa Randall, John Baez, abject failures of Math, and supposedly physics with their ignorance of angular momentum because no hydrogen atom can form from proton=938MeV & electron = 0.5MeV
By Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck

Re: time to bounce the CHURNING sam wormley out of sci.physics
By Michael Moroney 6 posts 31 views updated 4:36 PM

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says of Conde Nast's Nicholas Thompson, he cannot do percentages like Kibo Parry Moroney, so what is kibo Parry Moroney even doing here in sci.math or sci.physics??
by Budd Hakken

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney calls his own mother a "pandemic shit mule" but says that President of South Korea will save Moon Bears

by Roger Davis

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney asks Trump to give South Korea to North Korea, for who wants to protect barbarians that torture Moon Bears in cages
by Roger Davis

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney talking to President Moon Jae-In about torturing Moon Bears in South Korea
by Irwin Houser

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says boycott South Korea's Hyundai UNTIL they stop torturing MOON BEARS
Kibo, is the flat screen composed of 12% tortured Moon Bear bile by Samsung? Kibo, is 12% of the
2:15 AM
by Buck Futter


Re: Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
AP's diary in 2020 lockdown and social-distancing // sociology series, book 2 Kindle Edition by
2:07 AM
by Michael Moroney

Re: 3-Nicholas Thompson, Wired magazine// Kibo Parry Moroney, stalker sickfuck gets published in Wired for his 938 is 12% short of 945, Yoo, Nick, why not publish Lisa Randall with her 938MeV proton, 0.5MeV electron which a hydrogen atom ceases to exist
Investigating Solid State Engineering versus Mechanical Simple Machine Engineering and AI-robots//
2:02 AM
by Bret Alva

Re: Autism..says Moroney //Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner//realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
How 6 legged insects evolved//How bird wings evolved// Wing experiment// evolution series, book 2
1:55 AM
by Michael Moroney

Re: 7Barry Shein's Moroney's world std stalker's hideout-- why Daniel Freedman, Michel Goemans, Vadim Gorin, Harvey Greenspan, flunked calculus & angular momentum never realizing Real proton has to be 840MeV
The AP- Linnaeus Classification of Biology-- Using Physics instead of wishy-washy characteristics//
1:52 AM
by Michael Moroney

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Lisa Randall, John Baez, abject failures of Math, and supposedly physics with their ignorance of angular momentum because no hydrogen atom can form from proton=938MeV & electron = 0.5MeV
Physics Superdeterminism replaces Darwin Evolution // biophysics series, book 1 Kindle Edition by
1:47 AM

by Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck

Re: Barry Shein, instead of being cornholed by Kibo Parry Moroney, why not try mounting the Kibo and spraying some semen into his bottom and hopefully can cure his stalking, and make sci.physics a better place// tired of this 27 year stalking
By Richard Cranium 2 posts 4 views updated

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Feb 8, 2022, 2:16:17 AM2/8/22

to

Dr Tao needs to publish in UCLA student newspaper that he now sees the light of day that a slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse and stop his propaganda bullshit math that Dr. Tao pollutes the minds of young students with. Why, any High School student can drop a Kerr lid (circle) into a scrolled up paper cone and eye witness the crescent moon shape added onto the circle to form a OVAL, never the ellipse, yet the bozo the clown of math Terry Tao still polluting the minds of students.

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney stalks "AnalButtfuckManure Attacks" Dartmouth's Philip J. Hanlon, Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne with his 10 OR 6 = 16; his ellipse a conic when it never was; his proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth..
On Friday, August 14, 2020 at 11:07:05 AM UTC-5, Professor Wordsmith wrote:
> "Ammo: Uncured Shit pile"

Kibo Parry Moron chimes in with--
On Tuesday, February 8, 2022 at 12:55:10 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Hagfish of Math and Slime Eel of Physics

> fails at math and science:

>"psychoceramic" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

Kibo, you stalker, is that as bad as Dr. Tao not apologizing for his conic section a ellipse when in truth it is a Oval?

Re: Terence Tao flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
> On Monday, March 12, 2018 at 9:58:42 PM UTC-5, Jan wrote:
> > On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 2:31:46 PM UTC-8, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > Terence Tao flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
> >
> > Must you post garbage?
>
> Jan, for Dr. Tao the question really is must he teach garbage like 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction and his mindless slant cut in single cone as ellipse when even a High School student can show it is a Oval.
> Even the moron Kibo Parry Moron with his 938 is 12% short of 945 recognizes the mindless failure of math that is Dr. Terence Tao.
>
> On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 7:25:44 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >of Math and of Physics "spamtard"
> >"psychoceramic"

> >flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
>
>

> On Monday, June 15, 2020 at 1:13:27 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Here you are!
> > Below you will find a simple *proof* that shows that certain conic
> > sections are ellipses.
> >

> > Some preliminaries:
> >
> > Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
> > in the proof:
> >
> > ^ x
> > |

> > -+- < xh

> > .' | `.
> > . | .
> > | | |
> > ' | '
> > `. | .'

> > y <----------+ < x0

> > Cone (side view):
> > .
> > /|\
> > / | \
> > /b | \

> > /---+---' < x h
> > / |' \
> > / ' | \
> > / ' | \
> > x 0 > '-------+-------\
> > / a | \
> >
> > Proof:
> >
> > r(x) a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence
> >
> > y(x)^2 r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.
> >
> > Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 1 ...equation of an ellipse
> >
> > qed
>
>

> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
>
>
>

> Dr. Andrew Wiles University Oxford needs to apologize in the Oxford student newspaper for aiding and abetting fake math taught at Oxford -- his ellipse from conic sections, his Harmonic series diverges, his 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction in the error filled Boole logic, but worst of all Wiles seems to be ignorant of the fact that Calculus is geometry and thus requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Andrew Wiles, publish today so no more students are brainwashed with your error filled mathematics.
> 
> 5th published book
>
> Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
> Preface:
> First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.
>
> The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.
>
> My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.
>
> Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.
>
> Product details
> File Size: 773 KB
> Print Length: 72 pages
> Publication Date: March 12, 2019

> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English

> ASIN: B07PMB69F5
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled

> X-Ray:  Not Enabled  
> Word Wise: Not Enabled

> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> 

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Feb 9, 2022, 1:09:39 AM2/9/22

to

Kibo says Sheldon Glashow Harvard, Harry Cliff, CERN, Peter Higgs Univ Edinburgh is Putin's minion, Kim Jong Un's stooge, unable to confirm real true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday Law
On Tuesday, February 8, 2022 at 11:36:44 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Kim Jong Un's stooge"

> fails at math and science:

> The letters
On Tuesday, February 8, 2022 at 11:55:23 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "Putin's minion"
> blithered:
> The letters in
>can be re-arranged to spell "I am
> the Purloined Scum".

HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.

Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
Length: 17 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : December 18, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 17 pages
• File Size : 698 KB
• ASIN : B082WYGVNG
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled

#1-4, 105th published book

Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.

Cover Picture: I assembled two atoms in this picture where the proton torus with a band of muons inside traveling around and around the proton torus producing electricity. And the pie-plates represent neutrons as parallel-plate capacitors.
Length: 39 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : March 24, 2020
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• ASIN : B086BGSNXN
• Print Length : 39 pages
• File Size : 935 KB
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,656,820 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#6413 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
#315 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
#4953 in Physics (Kindle Store)
 

#1-5, 112th published book

New Perspective on Psi^2 in the Schrodinger Equation in a Atom Totality Universe// Atom Totality series, book 5

Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

I first heard of the Schrodinger equation in college chemistry class. We never actually did any problem solving with the equation, and we were only told about it. Then taking physics my next year in college and after I bought the Feynman Lectures on Physics, just for fun for side reading, three volume set did I learn what this Schrodinger equation and the Psi^2 wavefunction was about. I am not going to teach the mathematics of the Schrodinger equation and the math calculations of the Psi or Psi^2 in this book, but leave that up to the reader or student to do that from Feynman's Lectures on Physics. The purpose of this book is to give a new and different interpretation of what Psi^2 is, what Psi^2 means. Correct interpretation of physics experiments and observations turns out to be one of the most difficult tasks in all of physics.

Cover Picture: a photograph taken of me in 1993, after the discovery of Plutonium Atom Totality, and I was 43 years old then, on a wintery hill of New Hampshire. It is nice that Feynman wrote a physics textbook series, for I am very much benefitting from his wisdom. If he had not done that, getting organized in physics by writing textbooks, I would not be writing this book. And I would not have discovered the true meaning of the Fine Structure Constant, for it was Feynman who showed us that FSC is really 0.0854, not that of 0.0072. All because 0.0854 is Psi, and Psi^2 is 0.0072.
Length: 20 pages

Product details
• ASIN : B0875SVDC7
• Publication date : April 15, 2020
• Language: : English
• File size : 1134 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled

• Print length : 20 pages
• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #240,066 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #65 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #481 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#1-6, 135th published book

QED in Atom Totality theory where proton is a 8 ring torus and electron = muon inside proton doing Faraday Law// Atom Totality series, book 6 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)  

Since the real true electron of atoms is the muon and is a one ring bar magnet thrusting through the 8 ring torus of a proton, we need a whole entire new model of the hydrogen atom. Because the Bohr model with the 0.5MeV particle jumping orbitals as the explanation of Spectral Lines is all wrong. In this vacuum of explaining spectral line physics, comes the AP Model which simply states that the hydrogen atom creates Spectral lines because at any one instant of time 4 of the 8 proton rings is "in view" and the electricity coming from those 4 view rings creates spectral line physics.

Cover Picture: Is a imitation of the 8 ring proton torus, with my fingers holding on the proton ring that has the muon ring perpendicular and in the equatorial plane of the proton rings, thrusting through. This muon ring is the same size as the 8 proton rings making 9 x 105MeV = 945MeV of energy. The muon ring has to be perpendicular and lie on the equator of the proton torus. Surrounding the proton-torus would be neutrons as skin or coating cover and act as capacitors in storing the electricity produced by the proton+muon.

Product details
• ASIN : B08K47K5BB
• Publication date : September 25, 2020
• Language : English
• File size : 587 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled

• Print length : 25 pages
• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #291,001 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #13 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #334 in General Chemistry

#1-7, 138th published book

The true NUCLEUS of Atoms are inner toruses moving around in circles of a larger outer torus// Rutherford, Geiger, Marsden Experiment revisited // Atom Totality Series, book 7 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

The geometry of Atoms of the Table of Chemical Elements is torus geometry. We know this to be true for the torus geometry forms the maximum electricity production when using the Faraday Law. We see this in Old Physics with their tokamak toruses attempting to make fusion, by accelerating particles of the highest possible acceleration for the torus is that geometry. But the torus is the geometry not only of maximum acceleration but of maximum electrical generation by having a speeding bar magnet go around and around inside a torus== the Faraday law, where the torus rings are the copper closed wire loop. The protons of atoms are 8 loops of rings in a torus geometry, and the electron of atoms is the muon as bar magnet, almost the same size as the proton loops but small enough to fit inside proton loops. It is torus geometry that we investigate the geometry of all atoms.
Length: 41 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : October 9, 2020
• File Size : 828 KB
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print Length : 41 pages
• ASIN : B08KZT5TCD
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled

#1-8, 1st published book

Atom Totality Universe, 8th edition, 2017// A history log book: Atom Totality Series book 8 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision 7Apr2021. This was AP's first published science book.

Advisory: This is a difficult book to read and is AP's research log book of the Atom Totality in 2016-2017. I want to keep it for its history value. AP advises all readers wanting to know the Plutonium Atom Totality theory to go to the 9th edition that is the latest up to date account of this theory. The reason AP wants to keep the 8th edition is because of Historical Value, for in this book, while writing it, caused the discovery of the real electron is the muon of atoms. The real proton of atoms is 840MeV and not the 938MeV that most books claim. The particle discovered by JJ Thomson in 1897 thinking he discovered the electron of atoms was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole at 0.5MeV. This discovery changes every, every science that uses atoms and electricity and magnetism, in other words, every science.

Foreward:
I wrote the 8th edition of Atom Totality and near the end of writing it in 2017, I had my second greatest physics discovery. I learned the real electron of atoms was the muon at 105MeV and not the tiny 0.5MeV particle that J.J.Thomson found in 1897. So I desperately tried to include that discovery in my 8th edition and it is quite plain to see for I tried to write paragraphs after each chapter saying as much. I knew in 2017, that it was a great discovery, changing all the hard sciences, and reframing and restructuring all the hard sciences.
Length: 632 pages

Product details
File Size: 1132 KB
Print Length: 632 pages

Publication Date: March 11, 2019

Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English

ASIN: B07PLP9NDR

Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray:  Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Enabled

Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled

Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #578,229 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#1610 in Physics (Kindle Store)
#8526 in Physics (Books)
#18851 in Biological Sciences (Books)

#1-9, 163rd published book
Stellar System Evolution for Advanced Intelligent Life //Atom Totality science Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition

Preface: This book explores the question of why the Sun has a planet with abundant life that evolved over 3.7 billion years ago into the advanced intelligent life of humans, yet the Sun has gone Red Giant initiation phase that threatens to destroy all life on Earth in the next few thousand years. The question of why even bother having advanced intelligent life if the home star quickly destroys that life and the planet it resides upon? Why bother with advanced intelligent life if it is put under such enormous stress and strain and energy to move to a distant satellite of Europa and Ganymede. Surely the Cosmic design must tell us why this is our fate.
Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of Europa.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09NQ65H9F

• Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 15, 2021
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 999 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled

• Print length ‏ : ‎ 60 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#1-10, 161st published book

PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface:
A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1

• Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

y z

| /
| /
|/______ x

More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.

In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.

There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium

#2-1, 137th published book

Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

#1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory

This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.

Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.

Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
Length: 64 pages

Product details
• File Size : 790 KB
• Publication Date : October 5, 2020
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 64 pages
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled

• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled

• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Language: : English
• ASIN : B08KS4YGWY

• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

#2-2, 145th published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2

Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.

Product details
• ASIN : B08PC99JJB
• Publication date : November 29, 2020
• Language: : English
• File size : 682 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 78 pages
• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)

#2-3, 146th published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3

Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB

• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)

#2-4, 151st published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4

Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.

Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.

Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM

• Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1033 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#2-9, 161st published book

PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface:
A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1

• Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

y z

| /
| /
|/______ x

More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.

In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.

There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium

#3-1, 2nd published book

True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Feb 11, 2022, 11:31:50 PM2/11/22

to

Kibo Parry M impatient with Dr.Tao apology for teaching mind-rot ellipse a slant cut in single cone.

On Friday, February 11, 2022 at 10:07:41 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "Village Idiot of

> fails at math and science:

>"where are my marbles?"

>flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

Kibo says Dr. Tao to publish in UCLA his apology for teaching slant cut in single cone as ellipse when in reality it is a oval.
> On Thursday, February 10, 2022 at 12:39:12 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"barking fuckdog"

> >flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> > Hagfish of Math and Slime Eel of Physics

> >requires Andrew Wiles to publish an apology in Oxford Univ student
> > newspaper that he is sorry for misleading all his students that the
> > slant cut in single cone is not a ellipse but is a oval.
>
>
>
> AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC

> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled

> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> •
> •

> Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

> Last revision was 26Jan2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.
>
> Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.
>
> In November of 2019, I was challenged to make the definition of Oval a well defined definition. I took up that task, and fortunately I waited a long time since, 2016, my discovery that the oval was the slant cut into a cone, not the ellipse. I say fortunately because you need physics in order to make a well defined definition of oval. You need the knowledge of physics, that electricity is perpendicular to magnetism and this perpendicularity is crucial in a well defined definition of oval. When I discovered the ellipse was never a conic in 2016, I probably could not have well defined the oval at that time, because I needed the 3 years intervening to catch up on a lot of physics, but by November 2019, I was ready willing and able. Then in August of 2020, I discovered a third new proof of Ellipse is a cylinder section never a conic section, using solid 3rd dimension geometry of ovoid and ellipsoid.
>
> Cover picture is a cone and a cylinder on a cutting board and that is an appropriate base to place those two figures because sectioning means cutting, and the cuts we want to make into a single cone and a cylinder is a slant cut not a cut parallel to the base of the figures, nor a cut that leaves the figure open ended but a slant cut that leaves the figure a closed loop.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6

> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English

> • File size ‏ : ‎ 2021 KB
> • Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited

> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 50 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
>
> #11-2, 11th published book

> World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
> Preface:

> Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
>

> Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.
>
> To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
>
> Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
>
>
> Product details
> ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
> Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
> Language ‏ : ‎ English

> File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB

> Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

> Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
> Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> #134 in Calculus (Books)
> #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

> y

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Feb 15, 2022, 3:55:56 PM2/15/22

to

Why does MIT fail math & physics, Kibo Parry Moron???

On Tuesday, February 15, 2022 at 8:53:49 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>of Math and of Physics "Putin's Stooge"
>"one marble illogical brain" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> On Tuesday, February 15, 2022 at 1:25:47 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >of Math and 🦧 of Physics Village Idiot"
> >"only 1 marble illogical brain"

> >flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> > fails at math and science:

> > > So, what is magnificent about this model of a wheel& axle for angular momentum is that it is a simpl
> > re-arranged to
> >spell "Mule
> > Manure! Cops hid it!"
>
> Why Kibo Parry Moron, because no-one at MIT can do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, or cannot see that the slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse? Or is it MIT's repugnant logic of Boole where Boole screwed up on all the connectors with his 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. Or, is it Kibo Parry Moron, that no-one at MIT has more than a one marble brain to question which is the atom's true electron -- the muon or the 0.5MeV particle that AP says is Dirac's magnetic monopole? Which is it Kibo Parry Moron the stalker of Usenet for 30 years, the mindless shithead of Usenet.
>
> 3rd published book

> 2nd published book
>
> True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>

> Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.
>
> Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.
>
> Length: 1150 pages
>
>
> Product details
> • File Size : 2167 KB
> • ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
> • Publication Date : March 11, 2019
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print Length : 1150 pages
> • Language: : English
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Lending : Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #181 in General Chemistry & Reference
> #1324 in General Chemistry

> #1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Feb 19, 2022, 8:11:17 PM2/19/22

to

Kibo Parry M says General Nakasone has one marble brain for he cannot understand a slant cut in single cone is a OVAL, never the ellipse.

On Saturday, February 19, 2022 at 1:09:58 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>of Math and of Physics

> "little fish of physics"

> "one marble illogical brain"
>flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> And just who is
> that nobody of physics, to call
> Cambridge a second rate university? It is up to actual physicists and
> professors to look at the quality of courses and of the graduates of
> Cambridge, to determine if Cambridge still meets the high standards it
> always has.
>
> Of course, if Cambridge ever started teaching anything so absurdly
> stupid like atoms have unstable muons instead of electrons in them, that
> electrons are the never-detected magnetic monopole, or that the ellipse
> isn't a conic section, despite many proofs that it is, then Cambridge
> would immediately be no longer a top tier but a diploma mill or a Trump
> University equivalent. In reality, any of their professors teaching
> such garbage would be fired so fast and sent to the nearest funny farm.
> > Harry Cliff, AP requires that Harry Cliff LHCb physicist to publish in the Cambridge Univ student newspaper of how sorry he is and apologizes for his physics stupidity of thinking that a hydrogen atom is composed of a electron of 0.5MeV flying around outside of a proton of 938MeV, flying around at 99% speed of light and still holding up and holding together as a hydrogen atom.

AP writes: why Kibo Parry Moron? Is it that you and General Nakasone fail to understand a 1 axis symmetry single cone can never yield a 2 axes symmetry ellipse???? Can General Nakasone at least do a correct percentage that you Kibo fail to do with your 938 is 12% short of 945. And this begs the question of what General Nakasone's War Colleges teach, do they teach rubbish like a ellipse is a conic section and rubbish like 938 is 12% short of 945. Kibo Parry Moron belongs nowhere near education, but rather in a diamond mind, digging for diamonds.

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

Just hours after Kibo Parry Moron gets inducted into the CIA, he blows his cover (I guess the insanity of stalking for Kibo is so overpowering that he cannot help himself and wants to join the Portugal-- forgiv me, i sick i cry---

Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:
> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >

Kibo, how long did it take for you to blow your cover under NSA???

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Mar 1, 2022, 11:17:06 AM3/1/22

to

"Kibo kill Putin before Putin kills planet Earth" -- poem ballad by James Kibo Parry Moron of Rensselaer Polytech and Wired magazine.

Kibo Parry Moron, is this poem ballad of yours take after the Homeric "ILLIAD" or is it more of a Twilight Zone ballad.

What was that movie called??? Lonely in Seattle???? For Jeff Relf it needs a new title-- Intensely Insane in Seattle.

Kibo Parry recites Poem ballad "Kibo kill Putin before Putin kills planet Earth"

Just hours after Kibo Parry Moron gets inducted into the CIA, he blows his cover (I guess the insanity of stalking for Kibo is so overpowering that he cannot help himself and wants to join the Portugal-- forgiv me, i sick i cry---
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:
> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >

On Monday, February 28, 2022 at 4:58:13 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "spamtard"
>"barking fuckdog"

>flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> General Nakasone a decades long spammer of sci.math, yet he fails
> math.
>cannot understand the slant cut in single
> cone is an Oval, always the ellipse, or is it the foolish Boole logic he
> believes of 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction? Or is it that neither

>can do a geometry proof

> Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?

1
Kill Putin, before he kills our planet Earth

Humanity needs to colonize Europa-- not engulfed in nuclear war

Putin that petty dictator megalomaniac whore

Some say Caracalla was killed while taking a shit

A shit in France's woods run through with a sword bit

Some say Caracalla was killed while taking a piss

A piss on the plains of Turkey dismounting his horse

Does it really matter how the megalomaniac is dissed

Sun shines from Faraday law, not from fusion

That goonclod physicist professors confusion

It shines from Faraday law you mindless shit for brains

Kill Putin with stinger missile on a boat, car, train or plane

Xi has another Winter Olympic competition, fly in Putin on a plane

But before landing blow it to smithereens from the slalom train

The Chinese Communist Party was watching from the curling rink

Saying, good riddance to you Putin you mindless dink

And blame it on a engine failure, not made-in-China, but NK stink

The Sun gone Red Giant, needs humanity to colonize Europa

Not look at the idiot Putin or Xi navel belly button and scrota

2

Kibo kill Putin stink at NSA Winter Olympics toboggan run

Yes, kibo Parry Moron ordered by General Nakasone says Sun

Sun gone Red Giant phase while fool Putin wants Ukraine

Fool Xi with Chinese Communist Party wants Taiwan

Fool Kim of North Korea wants rockets to reach Sea of Japan

While the world needs rockets to reach Io, Europa and Ganymede

Kibo Parry eats a kilometer of Trump shit just to see where it comes from

Trump eats a kilometer of shit of Putin just to see where it comes from

Putin eats a kilometer of shit by Xi just to see where it comes from

Xi eats a kilometer of shit of Kibo, just to see where it comes from

Andrew Wiles proves that Terence Tao in Fermat Last Theorem prom

The ice skating Olympic gold medal is not given to Russian GazProm

Too many falls on the ice with the overdrugged skaters, drunk on vodka

When what is truly needed is a colony on Callisto, Io, Ganymede and Europa

3

Sun gone Red Giant Initiation phase, while idiots chase after Ukraine, Taiwan

Kibo Parry cut out Putin's arsehole and hand him back a brand new one

Kibo Parry Moroney cut out Xi's arsehole and hand him back a brand new one

Kibo Parry Moron eat a kilometer of Trump's shit just to see where it came from

Mama sang bass, Xi sang tenor, Putin joined Communist Party in a

When humanity needed to colonize Mars, Io, Ganymede, Callisto, Europa

How did you do it Kibo Parry Moron, a James Bond poisoned dagger walking cane

Or was it the stinger missile aimed at Putin brain

Or was it a Livia Caesar, poisoned chocolate bar

Or was it the traditional Texas housewife method of running over in the car

Or was it the Putin textbook method of polonium in the tea

Or was it the expeditious Xi method of blowing up his plane on the China Sea

Pray tell, Kibo, which was it, Mama sang bass, father sang tenor and all joined in a

We must admire Kibo Parry Moron for the first poem ballad that ends some lines in a

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Mar 4, 2022, 1:41:35 PM3/4/22

to

"one marble illogical brain" NSA General Nakasone flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 12:02:23 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>of Physics
>General Nakasone NSA "physics hater"

> fails at math and science:
> >

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Mar 6, 2022, 12:29:26 AM3/6/22

to

Kibo's nonstop harrassement of Dr.Hanlon Dartmouth-- going on 30 years of nonstop harrassement. Why Kibo, because they cannot do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, or are mixed up in mind of slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse.

On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 10:53:16 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>of Math and of Physics
Dr. Philip J. Hanlon
>"Putin's Stooge"
Dr. Marc Tessier-Lavigne
> Senile Chimp Mud Tour".

#11-1, 3rd published book

#11-3, 24th published book

World's First Proof of Kepler Packing Problem KPP // Math proof series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

There has been a alleged proof of KPP by Thomas Hales, but his is a fakery because he does not define what infinity actually means, for it means a borderline between finite and infinite numbers. Thus, KPP was never going to be proven until a well-defined infinity borderline was addressed within the proof. And because infinity has a borderline means that in free space with no borderlines to tackle and contend with, the 12 kissing point density that is the hexagonal close packed is the maximum density. But the truth and reality of Kepler Packing is asking for maximum packing out to infinity. That means you have to contend and fight with the packing of identical spheres up against a wall or border. And so, in tackling that wall, we can shift the hexagonal closed pack to another type of packing, a hybrid type of packing in order to get "maximum packing". So no proof ever of KPP is going to happen unless the proof tackles a infinity border wall. In free-space, a far distance away from a wall barrier of infinity border, then, hexagonal closed pack reigns and is the packing in all of free space-- but, the moment the packing gets nearby the walls of infinity border, then, we re-arrange the hexagonal closed pack to fit in more spheres. Not unlike us packing a suitcase and then rearranging to fit in more.

Cover picture: is a container and so the closed packing must be modified once the border is nearly reached to maximize the number of spheres.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07NMV8NQQ

• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 20, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1241 KB

• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

• Print length ‏ : ‎ 60 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#11-4, 28th published book

World's First Valid Proof of 4 Color Mapping Problem// Math proof series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Now in the math literature it is alleged that Appel & Haken proved this conjecture that 4 colors are sufficient to color all planar maps such that no two adjacent countries have the same color. Appel & Haken's fake proof was a computer proof and it is fake because their method is Indirect Nonexistence method. Unfortunately in the time of Appel & Haken few in mathematics had a firm grip on true Logic, where they did not even know that Boole's logic is fakery with his 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = 1, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 depending on which is subtracted. But the grave error in logic of Appel & Haken is their use of a utterly fake method of proof-- indirect nonexistence (see my textbook on Reductio Ad Absurdum). Wiles with his alleged proof of Fermat's Last Theorem is another indirect nonexistence as well as Hales's fake proof of Kepler Packing is indirect nonexistence.
Appel & Haken were in a time period when computers used in mathematics was a novelty, and instead of focusing on whether their proof was sound, everyone was dazzled not with the logic argument but the fact of using computers to generate a proof. And of course big big money was attached to this event and so, math is stuck with a fake proof of 4-Color-Mapping. And so, AP starting in around 1993, eventually gives the World's first valid proof of 4-Color-Mapping. Sorry, no computer fanfare, but just strict logical and sound argument.

Cover picture: Shows four countries colored yellow, red, green, purple and all four are mutually adjacent. And where the Purple colored country is landlocked, so that if it were considered that a 5th color is needed, that 5th color should be purple, hence, 4 colors are sufficient.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PZ2Y5RV

Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 23, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 1183 KB

Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

Print length ‏ : ‎ 34 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#11-5, 6th published book

World's First Valid Proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem, 1993 & 2014 // Math proof series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 29Apr2021. This is AP's 6th published book.

Preface:
Real proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem// including the fake Euler proof in exp3 and Wiles fake proof.

Recap summary: In 1993 I proved Fermat's Last Theorem with a pure algebra proof, arguing that because of the special number 4 where 2 + 2 = 2^2 = 2*2 = 4 that this special feature of a unique number 4, allows for there to exist solutions to A^2 + B^2 = C^2. That the number 4 is a basis vector allowing more solutions to exist in exponent 2. But since there is no number with N+N+N = N*N*N that exists, there cannot be a solution in exp3 and the same argument for higher exponents. In 2014, I went and proved Generalized FLT by using "condensed rectangles". Once I had proven Generalized, then Regular FLT comes out of that proof as a simple corollary. So I had two proofs of Regular FLT, pure algebra and a corollary from Generalized FLT. Then recently in 2019, I sought to find a pure algebra proof of Generalized FLT, and I believe I accomplished that also by showing solutions to Generalized FLT also come from the special number 4 where 2 + 2 = 2^2 = 2*2 = 4. Amazing how so much math comes from the specialness of 4, where I argue that a Vector Space of multiplication provides the Generalized FLT of A^x + B^y = C^z.

Cover Picture: In my own handwriting, some Generalized Fermat's Last Theorem type of equations.

As for the Euler exponent 3 invalid proof and the Wiles invalid FLT, both are missing a proof of the case of all three A,B,C are evens (see in the text).

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQKGW4M

• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1503 KB

• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

• Print length ‏ : ‎ 156 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#11-6, 19th published book

World's First Proof of Collatz Conjecture// Math proof series, book 6 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 20Aug2021. This is AP's 19th published book.

Preface: Old Math's Collatz conjecture, 1937, was this: If you land on an even number, you divide by 2 until you come to an odd number. If you come to or land on an odd number, you do a 3N+1 then proceed further. The conjecture then says that no matter what number you start with, it ends up being 1.

What the Collatz proof of math tells us, is that so very often mathematicians pose a conjecture in which their initial formulation of the conjecture is murky, obfuscation and poorly designed statement. Such poorly designed statements can never be proven true or false. An example that comes to mind of another poorly designed conjecture is the No Odd Perfect Conjecture, in which the statement is obfuscation of factors. So for the odd number 9, is it 1+3, or is it 1+ 3 + 3. So when a mathematics conjecture is full of obfuscation and error in the statement, then these type of conjectures never have a proof. And takes a person with a logical mind to fix and straighten out the conjecture statement and then provide a proof, thereof.

Cover picture: when I think of Collatz, I think of a slide, a slide down and so my French curve is the best slide I can think of, other than a slide-ruler, but a slide ruler is slide across.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PS98K5H

• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 16, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1955 KB

• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

• Print length ‏ : ‎ 61 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #212,131 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #4 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #9 in Number Theory (Kindle Store)
◦ #32 in Number Theory (Books)

#11-7, 20th published book

World's First Proofs that No Perfect Cuboid Exists// Math proof series, book 7 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Someone on the Internet posed the unproven No Perfect Cuboid, and so I took up the challenge. I am usually a sucker for geometry riddles, more so than number theory. So I obliged. Then by 2014 I proved the matter and looking back at it now in 2019, I really really do not see what all the fuss was about-- that it was not that hard not hard at all. You just have to look carefully at sets of 4 right triangles and find an Impossibility Construction, why you cannot have those 4 right triangles all with positive integer numbers for their 3 sides. But the proof method is so hugely important in math-- impossibility of construction. And, please, do not confuse that method with Reductio Ad Absurdum, for RAA is not a valid proof method in mathematics (see my logic book on RAA). But, the method of Impossible Construction, although it might look like RAA, is totally different and fully valid in all aspects.

But now, in hindsight in March 2019, writing this up, I see a very close connection of No Perfect Cuboid to that of Generalized Fermat's Last Theorem with its equation of A^x + B^y = C^z and the way I proved Generalized FLT was with "condensed rectangles" and the No Perfect Cuboid is a 3rd Dimension object but it is 4 rectangles of 4 right triangles we inspect. And we can pursue that connection between Generalized FLT and No Perfect Cuboid further, but not now.

Cover Picture: Is that of 4 rectangular boxes, 2 of which are cubes sitting atop a book page of the Cubic Set for the Transuranium Atoms, from the textbook "The Elements Beyond Uranium" , Seaborg, Loveland, 1990. I am always looking for connections.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PMZQNNT

• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 16, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1382 KB

• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

• Print length ‏ : ‎ 61 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#11-8, 21st published book

World's First Proofs of Mathematics Oldest Unsolved Problems: No Odd Perfect and Finiteness of Perfect Numbers // Math proof series, book 8 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 26Apr2021. And this is AP's 21st published book.

Preface: Now my history with these proofs goes back to 1991 to 1993, and have been finessing the proofs ever since. Some math proofs just nag nag and nag you. They just cannot be settled still. Their proof is a tiny tiny sliver of impossibility that is easily overlooked. Like an optical illusion that you are mislead into, or like those pictures where you look at it one way and you see a young lady and another way you see a very old lady.

Now the No Odd Perfect Number is not a important proof in mathematics but mostly a spectacle for it does not teach much beyond making proper correct definitions. And murky definitions is what held a proof of No Odd Perfect, other than 1, held it back. The murky definition of factors, do we include 1 or not include, for example the odd number 9, do we include 3 twice or once for that we have 1* 9 and we have 3*3 and Old Math looked at that as 1 + 3, whereas I would look at that as 1 + 3 + 3. So when you have messy definitions, murky and messy, of course no proof will be found in over 2,000 years.

Cover Picture: Shows our modern day new reality of the situation where the definition of "perfect" was a Ancient Greek idea, steeped in murky messy idea of factors and when to add factors, that no longer is suitable for mathematics.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PN1CPRP

• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 16, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1534 KB

• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

• Print length ‏ : ‎ 28 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#11-9, 15th published book

World's First Proofs of Infinitude of Twin-Primes, and Polignac Proved // Math proof series, book 9 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Circa 1991-1993, I gave an Old Math style of proof for the Infinitude of Twin Primes, modeling my proof as to a Euclid Infinitude of Primes Proof. But then came year 2009 when I found the way to make Infinity concept well-defined. Up until 2009, no-one in the world had a clear precise definition or understanding of what "infinity" was or what it means. It means a borderline between finite and infinite and the way to find this borderline is to use the Tractrix when the unit-tractrix area catches up with the area inside a unit circle is the infinity borderline and it happens to be when pi digits have three zeroes in a row, does the tractrix area equal the circle area-- hence, we reached infinity border and beyond are infinite numbers, no longer finite numbers. What that discovery does for proofs of infinitude is change all those proofs dramatically. And here in Twin-Primes and Polignac I show the reader how modern day New Math proves infinitude of any set of numbers.

Cover Picture: Is a picture of the first five twin-primes.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PMY1YWB

Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 15, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 1642 KB

Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

Print length ‏ : ‎ 9 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#11-10, 16th published book

World's First Proofs of Goldbach, Legendre, Staircase Conjectures// Math proof series, book 10 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

AP proved the Goldbach Conjecture starting 1993 where the Algebra Columns is the bedrock-key of the proof involved. The Algebra Column Array is the tool and no-one was going to prove Goldbach unless they had that tool, which the 2014 post of mine makes the array tool crystal clear. So starting 1993, I posted to sci.math about Array or Algebra Column which as a tool would render all proofs of this nature. The Goldbach conjecture historically dates back to 1742, and the Legendre conjecture dates 1752-1833. The Staircase conjecture is a wholly new conjecture proposed by AP circa 2016.

Cover: Is a Algebra Column Array sequence starting with 6 Array and then 8 Array.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PS6MR48

• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 15, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1740 KB

• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

• Print length ‏ : ‎ 36 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #148,852 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#4 in Number Theory (Kindle Store)
#38 in Number Theory (Books)
#7 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
 

#11-11, 25th published book

Disproof of Riemann Hypothesis // Math proof series, book 11 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 31Oct2021. This is AP's 25th book of science.

Preface: The Riemann Hypothesis was a conjecture never able to be proven and for good reason, for it was the last symptom of a rampant disease inside of mathematics. Old Math did not have the true numbers that compose mathematics. Old Math had a rag-tag ugly collection of fake numbers with their Reals, their Negative numbers compounded with Rationals compounded with Irrationals and then adding on the Imaginary. These are fake numbers, when the true numbers of mathematics are the Decimal Grid Numbers. Because Old Math uses fake numbers, is the reason that Riemann Hypothesis just languished, languished and languished. You cannot prove something riddled in fakery. Below I demonstrate why having fake numbers in math, creates fake proofs, fake theorems, and creates a conjecture that can never be proven.

Cover picture: Riemann Hypothesis deals with fake numbers of mathematics. When what is needed is the true numbers-- Decimal Grid Numbers. We learn Decimal Grid Numbers when very young, when just toddlers, wood counting blocks. All the true numbers of mathematics come from Mathematical Induction-- counting. Mathematical Induction is utterly absent in the Riemann Hypothesis, when it should be central to the hypothesis.
Length: 58 pages

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PVDS1RC

Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 20, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 1475 KB

Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

Print length ‏ : ‎ 58 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

Best Sellers Rank: #5,118,638 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #643 in Number Theory (Kindle Store)
◦ #1,398 in One-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #3,559 in Number Theory (Books)
 
#11-12, 152nd published book
The 6th Regular Polyhedron-- hexagonal faces at infinity// Math proof series, book 12

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Format: Kindle Edition

Last revision was 10Dec2021. And this is AP's 152nd published book of science.
Preface: This is my 152nd book of science an exciting book, and it came out of the clear blue. The writing of it took a mere week's time and it is a byproduct of my 151st book of science, TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 1st year College. Although my 151st book took me over a year to write; this book took just 1 week to write. Difference being that of a textbook versus that of a book on a specific topic, is 50 times more difficult because a textbook takes so much time in organizing, order, and fitting together pieces of each chapter in fact, whereas a single topic science book is like writing a prose story and is 50 times easier to write than a textbook.
While I was doing 151st, I noticed and emphasized that all of physics is determined by 6 laws of physics, and the first principle of physics is All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. Then we notice that 6 laws cover all of physics, 6 laws of electricity and magnetism. We notice that all of logic and math is covered by 6 operators. And then we look at geometry's regular polyhedrons and find there are only 5 known regular polyhedron with a proof in Old Math that a 6th Regular Polyhedron cannot exist. An actual proof in Old Math that a 6th cannot exist.
Well, AP knows better. For AP knows that if all of Physics is written in the language of just 6 laws and all of logic and mathematics are covered by 6 operators. That AP knows Old Math made a mistake in thinking they proved 5 regular polyhedron were all that exist as regular polyhedron. So Old Math made some or several mistakes in their so called proof that 5 and only 5 regular polyhedron exist, and that is what this book covers, the 6th regular polyhedron of the world, what it is, and what it looks like.
Warning: the entire book is written from a sequential dated notebook, so if you read something early on, I may have changed my mind on the idea near the end. This is not a textbook, but a notebook of discovery and read it for its history.
Cover Picture: is my iphone photograph of a soccer ball of 20 hexagons, 12 pentagons; and a glass ball covered by netting of tiny hexagons. Both objects I use in experiments of proving the 6th Regular Polyhedron.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09K4PWKVK

• Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 21, 2021
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 839 KB

• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 76 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#11-13, 160th published book

MATHOPEDIA-- List of 76 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface:
A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.

The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.

The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.

Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.

I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds question of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09MZTLRL5
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2021

• Language ‏ : ‎ English

• File size ‏ : ‎ 1147 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

• Print length ‏ : ‎ 62 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Mar 6, 2022, 9:19:29 PM3/6/22

to

Kibo Parry M calls William J. Burns analbuttfuckmanure but not General Nakasone and Nick Thompson's Wired Magazine// Is Kibo Parry Moron softening with age???
4 views
Subscribe


Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium

Mar 4, 2022, 2:12:59 PM (2 days ago)



to
Kibo Parry M calls William J. Burns analbuttfuckmanure but not General Nakasone and Nick Thompson's Wired Magazine// Is Kibo Parry Moron softening with age???

No Analbuttfuckmanure Nick Thompson's Wired Magazine and General Nakasone???
On Friday, March 4, 2022 at 1:53:17 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>of Math and of Physics Nick Thompson Wired Magazine crazy"
>General Nakasone NSA fails at math and science:
>can be re-arranged to spell "Re:
> Cupid's Muon Math Lie".

Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---

Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster

>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >

AP no longer tolerates permanent hate spew stalkers like Kibo Parry M. of 30 years stalking. AP no longer tolerates insane stalkers like Kibo no matter where they are located. Unacceptable that a govt agent stalks a USA citizen for almost 30 years of hate attack spew like kibo Parry Moroney and AP redacts the spew and throws it back into their lap.

Kibo Parry M. wrote which AP redacted, for AP no longer can stomach the insane Kibo
On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 1:49:36 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>William J. Burns "AnalButtfuckManure"

> fails at math and science:
>

AP writes: question Nick Thompson of Wired magazine, did your cover picture of Kibo Parry M include his discovery of his famous new word "analbuttfuckmanure" that he has continued to use since he invented it in late 2017???

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium

4:05 PM (4 hours ago)

Kibo Parry M on Mr. William Burns and General Nakasone why Kibo? Because they cannot understand the

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium

8:13 PM (3 minutes ago)



to
Kibo Parry M. on General Nakasone as a "onle-marble-brain", looks like Kibo is looking for a encore to his invented "analbuttfuckmanure" word in late 2017 which Nick Thompson of Wired magazine promply had Kibo on the front cover of Wired magazine.

On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 7:09:13 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>of Math and of Physics

> fails at math and science:

>"onle marble illogical brain"
>flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> "Hilarious Cement Dump".

Nick, does "onle" deserve front cover of Wired Magazine?

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Mar 7, 2022, 7:50:30 PM3/7/22

to

Re: _Donald Schwendeman, Rensselaer,Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, is the reason you failed to confirm 0.5MeV was not the atom's electron but Dirac's monopole because you failed science like kibo
On Thursday, April 25, 2019 at 12:08:26 PM UTC-5, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> (12:00 AM) ? infinity border and FLT ?
> 　　∧_∧
> 　(　･ω･)
> ＿|　⊃／(＿＿
> ／　└-(＿＿＿／
> ￣￣￣￣￣￣￣
>
> (12:01 AM) zzz
> ＜⌒／ヽ-､_＿_
> ／＜_/＿＿＿＿／
>
>

#3-1, 2nd published book

True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.

Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.

Length: 1150 pages

Product details
• File Size : 2167 KB
• ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
• Publication Date : March 11, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 1150 pages
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#181 in General Chemistry & Reference
#1324 in General Chemistry
#1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#3-2, 50th published book

Geometry of the Chemical Bond; metallic, covalent, ionic//Chemistry Series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is the second book of the Series -- True Chemistry. I left off of True Chemistry with trying to solve the Chemical bond when the proton and muon inside of each and every atom is doing the Faraday Law. And since that book was already 1154 pages long, I decided to start afresh in a second book devoted to solving the Geometry of the chemical bond of metallic, covalent and ionic.
Cover Picture: PHYSICS: Part 2: Extended Version: Halliday & Resnick, 1986, pages 654, 655 talking about Capacitors and my collection of some capacitors in my lab. The first one is a two prong wall plug taken apart to show what the prongs fasten onto when plugged-in (two parallel plates). The next three are spade and socket connectors (two parallel plates). Next is circular or hook plates, and last is a cylinder plate and socket.

Length: 134 pages

Product details
Print Length : 134 pages
Publication Date : June 21, 2019
Word Wise : Enabled
ASIN : B07TCVBD93
File Size : 1308 KB

Language: : English
Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled

Simultaneous Device Usage : Unlimited

X-Ray : Not Enabled
Lending : Enabled
 

#3-3, 81st published book

Animal-CO2 of the 3 CO2 isomers// Chemistry Series, book 3

Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

CO2 molecule has 3 isomers. An isomer means same chemical formula but different geometries. The 3 isomers of CO2 come from fire-CO2 and animal-CO2. The fire-CO2 has the carbon atom as central in the molecule and one of the oxygen atoms has a unshared dipole. The animal-CO2 has the carbon atom on the periphery with an unshared dipole.
This is very important chemistry science for it impacts Global Warming but also hugely impacts biology because plants can only live on animal-CO2 and the fire-CO2 is a toxic poison to plants, much like CO is a toxic poison to animals.

Here we learn new facts about the molecules CO, N2, CO2, O2 and even H2O, new facts we never understood before, all because the real electron is the muon stuck inside a proton doing the Faraday Law and that chemical bonding is governed not by electrons but by Dirac magnetic monopoles, and that makes the Lewis structure be based on 6 not 8.

New concepts in chemistry: Lewis structure based on 6, not 8, and the unshared dipole. For a Lewis Structure based on 6, not 8, is the only logical way that the strongest bonded molecules end up being CO and N2. With a Lewis 8 Structure, the strongest bonded molecules, by logic, note, by logic would have to be O2 and FH or possibly FB. However, the proof is that bond dissociation energy of CO is the highest, proving Lewis 6 Structure is the true structure of Chemistry.

source: chem.ucsb.edu

in kJ/mol

CO 1076
N2 946
CO2 532
O2 498
C2 as in diamond is 602 kJ/mol
H2O = 492
OH = 425
H2 = 432

Cover Picture is a winter stored potted clover that I am experimenting with and shows a animal-CO2 molecule going in, and going out is a O2 molecule that animals need to breathe.
Length: 15 pages

Product details
ASIN : B084217LB9
Publication date : January 19, 2020
Language : English
File size : 1042 KB

Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Enabled

Print length : 15 pages
Lending : Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #277,873 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #9 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #297 in Biology (Kindle Store)

#3-4, 38th published book

Hypothesis that Tar restores the Iron in Rust, back to the iron metal object// Chemistry series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Back in 2003 I noticed that while working on my roof, that when I pulled off tar on steel, that the steel was shiny bright iron with no rust while all around where no tar was, was much rust. So that started me to think whether tar acts as a chemical reaction in which it takes the iron atoms out of rust and places those iron-atoms-back-into-the-iron-object. Now that was 2003, and I have not had much time to really dive into experiments on this topic. For one reason-- I have to wait years for the tar to dissolve the rust and perhaps return the iron from iron oxide back into the original iron object. No, I do not have years and I was far too busy with other items of science. But now I plan to do more on this subject. Especially since in 2017 I discovered the real electron of atoms is the muon at 105MeV and real proton is 840MeV, casting brand new light on chemistry and chemical reactions. The iron rust molecule Fe2O3 in New Chemistry where the .5MeV particle is not the electron but is Dirac's magnetic monopole, has to be reviewed in terms of this new found knowledge, and whether or not, tar can return the Fe2 back to the original metal object.

Picture cover: About 5 years ago this hammer and trowel were both iron rusted surfaces, both had iron rust, the trowel worse than the hammer. I put tar on the trowel rusty surface and today with a chisel removed some tar and see the shiny bright iron surface. I suppose if I had coated the hammer back then when I coated the trowel, the hammer would also be bright shiny iron. So the tar must have done something to not only remove the rust but restore the trowel to "more iron bright shiny surface", some claim (see below in text) that the tar only lifted the rust off the iron surface. I think there is more to it than just adhesion lift, and am thinking the tar takes the iron atoms out of iron oxide and puts the iron atoms back into the original iron object. So this is not a proof by any means, but a hypothesis, and a request for more research.
Length: 32 pages

File Size: 2655 KB
Print Length: 32 pages
Publication Date: April 9, 2019

Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English

ASIN: B07QK428KN

#3-5, 119th published book

Research Notebook of AP on True Chemistry Periodic Table of Elements based on 6, not the error-filled table of Old Chemistry, Chemistry Series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real true electron of atoms was the muon and this muon is stuck inside its attendant proton. The muon is of 105MeV while the proton is 840 MeV. The particle that JJ Thomson in 1897 discovered was not the electron of atoms but instead was the Dirac magnetic monopole. Such a huge huge mistake throughout all of chemistry and physics, to think the electron was 0.5MeV orbiting around a proton of 938MeV breaks even the angular momentum concept of physics, for no hydrogen atom can exist with a 0.5 MeV particle traveling almost the speed of light around a 938MeV particle just will not stay together. And besides, in that Bohr-Rutherford model of the atom, their subatomic particles have no function, no job, no task, nothing. In that viewpoint of the atom, there is little wonder that their Table of Elements would be mostly error after error after mistake.
Length: 108 pages

Product details
File Size: 1083 KB
Print Length: 108 pages
Publication Date: May 21, 2020
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B0891TTP29
Text-to-Speech: Enabled

X-Ray:  Not Enabled  
Word Wise: Enabled

Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
 

#3-6, 123rd published book

World's first logical teaching of 6.*10^23, Avogadro's number and "mole"; refurbished with "hyasys" as 6.18*10^23 // Chemistry series, book 6

Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface: I was worried I did not reach the target audience on this topic of mole and Avogadro's number. The cover picture is a High School physics textbook, a later edition of PSSC that I took when I was in High School circa 1967. It teaches mole and Avogadro's number. So I needed to write this textbook starting High School, because it is shameful to teach wrong science in either High School or University.

Cover Picture is page 448-9 of PSSC Physics, 3rd ed., 1971, Haber-Schaim, Cross, Dodge, Walter, explaining how Rutherford in 1919 weighed the mass of the proton in a experiment. It is disheartening to find I cannot see that experiment in a Google search because of another famous experiment of Rutherford of the gold leaf. And lucky for me that I retrieved this PSSC book I used in High School circa 1967-8 that explains how the proton mass was weighed in physics history. The mass of the proton is vital to understand the mole and Avogadro's number concept. Sad of course that every Old Chemistry and Old Physics textbooks that teaches the concept mole and Avogadro number never mentions the proton mass as crucial to understanding.
Length: 70 pages

Product details
File Size : 796 KB
Publication Date : June 10, 2020
Word Wise : Enabled
Print Length : 70 pages
Language: : English
ASIN : B08B1GCRDH
Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled

Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
X-Ray : Not Enabled

Lending : Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #233,083 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #68 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #69 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #425 in General Chemistry

y z

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Mar 8, 2022, 4:41:50 AM3/8/22

to

Kibo Parry M says NSA General Nakasone and NSF Dr.Panchanathan are slime eels and one marble illogical brain.

On Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 2:19:25 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Hagfish of Math and Slime Eel of Physics

>"struggling for relevance"
>"one marble illogical brain"

>flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

..
.- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
, . `.' ' `.
.' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
. ; .' . `. ;
; . ' `. . '
. ' ` `. |
. '. '
. 0 0 ' `.
' `
; `
.' `
; U `
; '; `
: | ;.. :` `
: `;. ```. .-; | '
'. ` ``.., .' :' '
; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' I am Kibo Parry Moroney, the grand failure of science with my 938 is 12% short of 945, and my ellipse is a conic when it never was, and my idiocy of thinking geothermal is not radioactivity but is recycled solar fossil. I stalk on Internet because NSF pays a million dollars and is 5 times the salary of those professors stuck with actually teaching science and all I do is attack dog style in sci.math, sci.physics. And Barry Shein loves to whisper in my ear how 10 OR 2 =12 with AND as subtraction
` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` `. ````'''''' ' '
` . ' '
/ ` `. ' ' .
/ ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
/ .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
/ .'' ; ` .' `
...'.' ; .' ` ## .' `
"" .' .' | ` .; \ `
; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
:' | ' ` , `. `
| ' ` ' `. `
` ' ` ; `. |
`.' ` ; `-'
`...'

AP writes: Kibo Parry Moron, is that you in your dress whites wearing two "stalker ribbons"?

Just hours after Kibo Parry Moron gets inducted into the CIA, he blows his cover (I guess the insanity of stalking for Kibo is so overpowering that he cannot help himself and wants to join the Portugal-- forgiv me, i sick i cry---

Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster

On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:

> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Mar 13, 2022, 5:08:03 AM3/13/22

to

Re: 1-Kibo Parry Moroney, how do you clean your dick after it has been up Barry Shein's arsehole, or does it improve your stalking
327 views by Richard Cranium May 10, 2020, 8:30:43 PM

Kibo kill Putin before Putin kills planet Earth-- poem ballad by James Kibo Parry Moron of Rensselaer Polytech and Wired magazine
On Wednesday, September 28, 1994 at 5:14:31 AM UTC-5, James Kibo Parry wrote:
>Equivalence of KGB and NBC and CIA and EEC
> -- K.

Kibo, where is the poem recital? Rensselaer Polytech at student union with megaphone bull horn???

Kibo kill Putin before Putin kills planet Earth-- poem ballad by James Kibo Parry Moron of Rensselaer Polytech and Wired magazine

>
> Kibo Parry recites Poem ballad "Kibo kill Putin before Putin kills planet Earth"
>

> Just hours after Kibo Parry Moron gets inducted into the CIA, he blows his cover (I guess the insanity of stalking for Kibo is so overpowering that he cannot help himself and wants to join the Portugal-- forgiv me, i sick i cry---
> Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:
> > In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> > >

Famous poem ballad of Kibo kill Putin before Putin kills planet Earth.

And since this was written, Senator Lindsey Graham has popped up in support of the idea, likening the history to Brutus of Ancient Rome or of Claus von Stauffenberg failed attempt on the insane Hitler.

On Monday, February 28, 2022 at 4:58:13 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "spamtard"
>"barking fuckdog"

>flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> Kibo can David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson help Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else turn the light switch off in Slow Light rather than play ad hominem games.
>
> Instead of doing Physics where AP proves that Light Waves are pencil ellipse closed loop circuits not straightline arrow rays, both Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Else want to play games of ad hominem. Whenever physics proves AP is correct, neither Harvard's Dr. Hau nor Berkeley's Sylvia Else want to complete or perform the experiment because they do not want to credit AP. They want physics such that it gives credit to those people they like. Just the opposite of what Feynman warned of-- physics does not care who the person is that discovers the truth. But in modern times, physics at Harvard, MIT, Berkeley is first concern is who gets credit and the actual physics involved-- be damned.
> 
>
> So, Dr. Hau and Sylvia-- why not learn to do the physics rather than your utter hatred of AP.
>
> Time for Harvard's Dr. Hau to finish her experiment, or have UC Berkeley Sylvia Else finish the experiment.
>
> The Internet indicates a Sylvia Else is a physics graduate of Berkeley.
>
> So then, Berkeley has to stand up to the challenge that AP throws into their court yard. I throw into your court yard that if Harvard's Dr. Hau set up her slow light experiment. And sees a column of slow light in BEC medium with entrance light at normal speed and exit light at normal speed, only the BEC cold region with slow light. Now, now Dr. Hau, now Sylvia Else, turn the source light off. And to your fascination and the fascination of the entire world, watch and see that the slow light vanishes instantly along with the normal fast light. The entire column of light vanishes simultaneously.
>
> Why does it vanish all at once simultaneously Sylvia? Why does it vanish all at once Dr. Hau? Why does it vanish all at once Harvard Univ and Berkeley physics? Why does it vanish all at once simultaneously Berkeley UC?
>
> It vanishes all at once because light waves are closed loop circuits around a source and no matter how fast those closed loop circuits in a region of the circuit, the moment the source is gone -- the entire light is gone.
>
> Harvard Dr. Hau and dumb and Berkeley Sylvia Else think Light Waves are arrow like single rays with a head and tail on a arrow ray. But that is only because they are ignorant in physics. They cannot turn off the light for it proves AP correct-- that the Light Wave is a closed loop circuit with the source of the light always in the closed loop circuit. So if and when those two incompetents Dr. Hau and Sylvia Else turn off the light source, all the light the fast light the Slow Light, the fast light exiting the BEC medium, all the Light vanishes simultaneously.
>
> Harvard's Hau and Berkeley's Else think that the SLOW LIGHT will still be visible, still be crawling slow in the BEC. But no, it vanishes instantly as all the other light from that source. But Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else do not want to report that truth, no, they want to never report any true science that is connected with Archimedes Plutonium, because Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else are not scientists at all-- but suppression jerks.
>
> What have we proven here Sylvia? What have we proven here Harvard's Dr. Hau. You have proven that light waves, like electricity are closed loop circuits, like a hoola hoop. And this is the reason you can have light as a constant maximum speed, yet slow light down in a region of the circuit of light.
>
> So, Harvard's Dr. Hau, get off your lazy ways and complete your experiment, throw the switch off-- and see for yourself that light all vanishes simultaneously. And report your experiment to the world-- that light is a closed loop circuit, not what you believed all along before-- light is a single ray with head and tail. No, light was never a single ray of head of tail, like a arrow. Light is like a closed loop circuit, a pencil ellipse.
>
> So get off your lazy ways and finish the experiment.
>
> Or have Sylia Else in Berkeley California set up the slow light experiment and have Sylvia finish and complete the experiment.
>
> Times a wasting, with your chit chat Sylvia, time you roll up your sleeves and burn the midnight oil.

>
> AP, King of Science, especially Physics
>
>

> Is Kibo Parry M. the largest taxpayer fraud waste and abuse in Usenet history, paid $100 per stalker post by NSF and dept Educ Dr. Panchanathan??????????
>
> On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 6:15:27 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 6:24:20 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> >blithered:
> On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > "FireD your ass"
>
> snip the threats of violence kibo so many times posted
>
> AP writes: Kibo Parry M. is NSF Dr. Panchanathan and USA dept Educ going to pay you $100. for that post?? If so, then Barry Shein's World std must be a goldmine of USA taxpayer fraud waste and abuse. Just posting abusive stalker defaming spam for 28 years now. No wonder Kibo keeps defaming and stalking; many people would gladly defame and stalk at $100. a post.
>
> Re: The Gabriel Polynomial- an advanced stealing and stolen item from Archimedes Plutonium and his book//
> by Michael Moroney Sep 27, 2021, 1:16 AM
>
> Re: 1-Did Kibo-Parry-Maroney fail Rensselaer or was kicked out due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938, the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole
> by Roy Masters Sep 13, 2019, 3:24:07 PM
>
> Re: 1.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Maroney fail Rensselaer or was kicked out due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938, the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole
> by Patricio J. Whackmember Sep 13, 2019, 5:43:28 PM
>
> Re: 1.9-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Korniss,Toh-Ming Lu,Martin
> By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:57:15 AM
>
> Re: 2.0-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Michael,Newberg,N'Gom
> By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:57 AM
>
> Re: 2.1-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Persans,Schroeder,Shur
> By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:39 AM
>
> Re: 2.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to math percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
> By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:28 AM
>
>
> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
> Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang
> Rensselaer math department
> Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann
>
> Re: A newsgroup like sci.math is a pile of shit when you have paid stalkers like Kibo Parry M. or Dan Christensen lording over sci.math as if he owns the place-- stalking and attacking posters 7-24-365. This is why I now post a roadmap to AP's newsgr
> by Alan Mackenzie Jun 29, 2021, 2:36:04 PM
>
> Re: 30) AP's 174th book// Mathopedia-- Listing of 70 fakes and mistakes of Old Math. Last revision was 28JUN2021. Preface: I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held
> by Michael Moroney Jul 3, 2021, 12:55:10 PM
>
> Re: 5) AP's 174th book// Mathopedia-- Listing of 67 fakes and mistakes of Old Math. Last revision was 8JUN2021. Under-Construction: AP recently is reinventing Multivariable Calculus, and will end up throwing out Old Math's Gradient theorem, Green's
> by
> Michael Moroney
> Jun 17, 2021, 11:57 AM

>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney stalks "AnalButtfuckManure Attacks" Dartmouth's Philip J. Hanlon, Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne with his 10 OR 6 = 16; his ellipse a conic when it never was; his proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth..

> 1481 views
> by Professor Wordsmith Aug 14, 2020, 11:07:05 AM
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney threatening the life of AP with his incited hatred of 28 years stalking
> 148th published book Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1
> Jun 16, 2021, 12:09 AM
> by
> Graham Cooper
>
>
> Re: 1- Kibo Parry Moroney threatening the life of AP, with his inciting hatred of 28 years stalking leading to Violence
> Mutt Buncher Re: 3- Kibo Parry Moroney says Dr. Tao, Hales, Stillwell, Wiles, educators
> Jun 16, 2021
> by
> Efftard K. Donglemeier
>
>
> Re: l) AP's 175th book//Physicsopedia-- Listing of 125 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics. New entrees under construction: AP is reinventing Multivariable Calculus so that AP throws on the trash pile the Green's theorem, Gradient theorem, Stokes
> by Michael Moroney Jun 13, 2021, 4:47:35 PM
>
> Re: 1-Kibo Parry Moroney on failed physicist Steven Weinberg who cannot entertain the question of which is the real electron of atoms-- is it the muon or the 0.5MeV particle?
> by Mina Arvuti lähedal May 30, 2021, 7:54 AM
>
> Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block, Ernest Abers, Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and 0.5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
> by Michael Moroney Mar 3, 2019, 6:38:18 PM
>
>
> Re: 77,233 Student victims of Lawrence Bacow's Harvard from stalker Kibo Parry Moroney with his 938 is 12% short 945, his 10 OR 4 = 14 with AND as subtraction, and his mindless belief real electron = 0.5MeV when true electron is muon
> 11:57 AM 10Apr2021
> by Wayne Decarlo
>
> Re: 135,566 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron o
> May 10, 2021
> by Michael Moroney
>
> Re: 6Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
> By Michael Moroney 28 posts 292 views updated 12:31 PM
>
> Re: L. Reif, Marty Walsh, Charlie Baker, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins-- Moroney-- Boston's antiscience stalker fool//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> By Michael Moroney 19 posts 120 views updated 12:28 PM
>
> Re: If Marissa Mayer were still at Google-- probably take her 15 minutes to engineer a better newsgroup
> By Michael Moroney 20 posts 156 views updated 12:26 PM

>
> Re: 8Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS

> By Michael Moroney 29 posts 422 views updated 12:25 PM
>
> Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block,Ernest Abers,Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
> By Michael Moroney 34 posts 244 views updated 12:23 PM

>
> Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work

> By Michael Moroney 20 posts 165 views updated 12:22 PM
>
> Re: Racist-math at Reed College-- ellipse is never a conic, David Perkinson, Lyudmila Korobenko, John Lind, Dylan McNamee, Kyle Ormsby, Angelica Osorno
> By Michael Moroney 50 posts 405 views updated 12:21 PM
>
> Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
> By Michael Moroney 44 posts 461 views updated 12:17 PM
>
> Re: 1Moroney barks at math failures Baez, Bullock, Witten. But I see the three as having failed Angular Momentum with their 938 proton and .5MeV electron
> 12/30/18
> by j4n bur53
>
> Re: TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS series by Archimedes Plutonium, only math books to teach correct calculus with a geometry proof of Fundamental theorem of Calculus. Old Math cannot even fix its mistake of ellipse is a cylinder section, never a conic.
> by Michael Moroney
>
> Re: 5-AP's 150th book// TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Freshperson College// Physics textbook series, book 4 by Archimedes Plutonium// Using as template Halliday& Resnick & AP's Senior year High School to AP's 150th book// TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//
> by Michael Moroney
>
> Re: Zelos asks why Harvard's Dr. Hau wants to fail in physics, by not turning off the light to see if light wave is a closed loop pencil ellipse that AP predicts. Is Dr.Hau stubborn and too ignorant to finish her experiment??
> by Michael Moroney
>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney on Dr. Thorp stealing AP's dog theory connected to why he is a failure on Lewis 8 Structure because CO and N2 dissociation energy says it is Lewis 6 Structure. Yes, Kibo, what is your psychoanalysis of Dr. Thorp stealing? Is steal
> Ebenezer Splooge

>
> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney asks Trump to give South Korea to North Korea, for who wants to protect barbarians that torture Moon Bears in cages
> by Roger Davis
>

> Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says of Dr. Tao "ant of Math" and a pandemic shit mule// Perhaps because Dr. Tao is such a failure of math, he believed primes are real when Naturals have no division-- and failures of math overlook even the most obvious
> by Professor Wordsmith Jul 25, 2020, 8:23:21 PM
>
> Re: 8-Kibo Parry Moroney says boycott Samsung & Hyundai until South Korea stops torturing to death caged Moon Bears // SOUTH KOREA, MOON BEARS Moon Bears of South Korea need the world's helping hand from evil//SCIENCE COUNCIL RULE EARTH
> by Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck Jul 28, 2020, 5:35:52 PM
>
> Re: 1- Kibo Parry Moroney says of math failure Dan Christensen Univ. Western Ontario with his ellipse a conic when it never was//And his insane Boole logic of 10 OR 2 = 12// pandemic shit mule
> by Hank Hill Jul 26, 2020, 7:26:18 PM
>
> Re: 102-Kibo Parry Moroney (Barry Shein's world std) stalking analbuttfuckmanure shithead of 27 years nonstop-- needs a emergency straightjacket size XXsmall
> By Eduardo Remington 2 posts 3 views updated 12:15 AM
>
> Re: 1-Kibo Parry Moroney, how do you clean your dick after it has been up Barry Shein's arsehole, or does it improve your stalking
> 285 views
> by Richard Cranium May 10, 2020, 8:30:43 PM

>
> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
>
>
>

> ..
> .- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
> , . `.' ' `.
> .' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
> . ; .' . `. ;
> ; . ' `. . '
> . ' ` `. |
> . '. '
> . 0 0 ' `.
> ' `
> ; `
> .' `
> ; U `
> ; '; `
> : | ;.. :` `
> : `;. ```. .-; | '
> '. ` ``.., .' :' '

> ; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' Hi, I am Kibo Parry Moroney, the grand failure of science with my 938 is 12% short of 945, and my ellipse is a conic when it never was, and my idiocy of thinking geothermal is not radioactivity but is recycled solar fossil. I stalk on Internet because NSF pays a million dollars and is 5 times the salary of those professors stuck with actually teaching science and all I do is attack dog style in sci.math, sci.physics.

> ` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
> ` ` ; ; ' '
> ` ` ; ; ' '
> ` `. ````'''''' ' '
> ` . ' '
> / ` `. ' ' .
> / ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
> / .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
> / .'' ; ` .' `

> ...'.' ; .' ` .' `

> "" .' .' | ` .; \ `
> ; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
> :' | ' ` , `. `
> | ' ` ' `. `
> ` ' ` ; `. |
> `.' ` ; `-'
> `...'
>
>
>
>

> Why can no-one at Rensselaer help Dr. Hau turn the light switch off and prove that the Light wave is a circuit pencil ellipse not a arrow ray of head and tail which everyone except AP believes.
> 

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Mar 14, 2022, 2:09:00 AM3/14/22

to

Kibo Parry M. says Andrew Wiles is a failure because he cannot understand a Oval is the conic slant cut, not the ellipse and is too dumb to do a geometry proof of fundamental theorem of calculus-- see AP's proof below.

On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 11:06:26 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>of Math and of Physics

"Drag Queen of Science"
>
> > China's Xi thinks all 5977 Russian nuclear warheads are aimed at USA
> and none at Beijing, why McGinn???
> It's taking you no time at all to spam this 5977 times!

Michael Moroney

Re: Andrew Wiles flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
By Zelos Malum 67 posts 1027 views updated 2:22 PM

May 15, 2020, 1:55:46 AM

Minnow of Math and Runt of Physics "struggling for relevance" <

Michael Moroney

Re: Andrew Wiles flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
By Zelos Malum 67 posts 1027 views updated 2:22 PM

May 15, 2020, 2:00:19 AM

Hagfish of Math and Slime Eel of Physics "struggling for relevance"

Michael Moroney

Re: Andrew Wiles flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
By Zelos Malum 67 posts 1027 views updated 2:22 PM

May 15, 2020, 3:19:55 PM

Tunicate of Math and Sea Squirt of Physics "I ate my brain" <

Doctor Anagram

Jul 1, 2020, 2:22:34 AM

The letters in can be re-arranged to spell "Porn Sale! I emit

Doctor Anagram

Jul 3, 2020, 9:44:44 PM

The letters in can be re-arranged to spell "Run! Mum solicited

Michael Moroney

Re: Andrew Wiles flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
By Zelos Malum 67 posts 1027 views updated 2:22 PM

Aug 20, 2020, 1:40:41 AM

Piñata of sci.math and Punching Bag of sci.physics

Michael Moroney

Re: Andrew Wiles flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
By Zelos Malum 67 posts 1027 views updated 2:22 PM

Aug 25, 2020, 4:16:45 AM

> tarded: >The fakery of

Michael Moroney

Re: Andrew Wiles flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
By Zelos Malum 67 posts 1027 views updated 2:22 PM

Oct 31, 2020, 9:24:30 PM

Snail of Math and Green Banded Broodsac Nemotode of Physics "I ate my brain"

Michael Moroney

Re: Andrew Wiles flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
By Zelos Malum 67 posts 1027 views updated 2:22 PM

Nov 1, 2020, 4:16:29 PM

zelos...@gmail.com

Jan 12, 2021, 5:11:45 AM
> Zelos on Andrew Wiles, too

zelos...@gmail.com wrote: >> zzzzzzzzzzzzz > > You talk about being over my head? Please,

Michael Moroney

Re: Andrew Wiles flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
By Zelos Malum 67 posts 1027 views updated 2:22 PM

Jan 12, 2021, 12:23:54 PM

"zelos...@gmail.com" <zelos...@gmail.com> writes: >tisdag 12 januari 2021 kl.

3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled

• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
•
•

Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 26Jan2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.

Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.

In November of 2019, I was challenged to make the definition of Oval a well defined definition. I took up that task, and fortunately I waited a long time since, 2016, my discovery that the oval was the slant cut into a cone, not the ellipse. I say fortunately because you need physics in order to make a well defined definition of oval. You need the knowledge of physics, that electricity is perpendicular to magnetism and this perpendicularity is crucial in a well defined definition of oval. When I discovered the ellipse was never a conic in 2016, I probably could not have well defined the oval at that time, because I needed the 3 years intervening to catch up on a lot of physics, but by November 2019, I was ready willing and able. Then in August of 2020, I discovered a third new proof of Ellipse is a cylinder section never a conic section, using solid 3rd dimension geometry of ovoid and ellipsoid.

Cover picture is a cone and a cylinder on a cutting board and that is an appropriate base to place those two figures because sectioning means cutting, and the cuts we want to make into a single cone and a cylinder is a slant cut not a cut parallel to the base of the figures, nor a cut that leaves the figure open ended but a slant cut that leaves the figure a closed loop.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 2021 KB
• Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited

• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled

• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 50 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#11-2, 11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.

To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English

File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB

Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages

Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Mar 14, 2022, 3:06:47 AM3/14/22

to

General Nakasone NSA "one marble illogical brain"flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test-- says stalker Kibo Parry M
On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 1:50:13 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
General Nakasone NSA "one marble illogical brain"flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
>crazy"

> fails at math and science:

General Paul Nakasone NSA questioned by Kibo Parry M, a underling at NSA, as to how many of NATO 5943 nuclear missiles are aimed at Chinese cities and North Korea. Kibo did Paul say half of the 5943? And specifically how many aimed at Peking??

Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---

Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster

>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Mar 15, 2022, 12:07:57 AM3/15/22

to

Analbuttfuckmanure MIT, Gilbert Strang, Sheldon Glashow, ETH Zurich, NSF Dr.Panchanathan says stalkers Kibo Parry M. & Jan Burse

On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 10:30:00 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Putin's minion" Plutonium

>"one marble illogical brain" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

Cornell a sicko school; Duke Univ dumb Alfred Goshaw, Henry Greenside, ETH wheelchair Walter Thurnherr, Werner Wegscheider, by the 29 year stalkers kibo Parry M & Jan Burse

On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 10:29:55 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Kim Jong Un's stooge"

>"one marble illogical brain"

Re: Drs.Alfred Goshaw, Henry Greenside of Duke Univ, are you as dumb as McElroy & __@__.__ //never realizing the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV,monopole=.5MeV
by Michael Moroney Dec 28, 2017

Re: Proof of Kepler Packing//Jan Burse-Alzheimer faggot//ETH Zurich, Dietmar Salamon, Martin Schweizer, Mete Soner, looking at it
by Dan Christensen Jul 9, 2017, 11:34:05 PM

Re: Zurich's ETH Dr.Thomas Willwacher's stupid all his life in teaching Calculus, never a picture diagram of FTC// as evidence- Jan Burse
12/13/17
by Dan Christensen

Re: Jan Burse says ETH is a wheelchair Walter Thurnherr, Werner Wegscheider, Audrey Zheludev, Oded Zilberberg //no picture diagram of Calculus proof// still believing proton is 938MeV electron .5MeV when they are 840MeV, 105MeV
By Jan Jul 27, 2018, 5:15:55 PM

Re: Valev be cut from Google Re: Pentcho Valev, the arse-wipe of physics
by
burs...@gmail.com Sep 3, 2017, 6:10:18 AM

Re: Drs.Katsushi Arisaka, Michalis Bachtis of UCLA, is McGinn a UCLA spamming robot? never realizing the Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton=840MeV, .5MeV= Dirac's monopole
by Roy Masters Aug 29, 2019, 1:39:38 AM

Re: ...although Kibo _universally regarded_ as having more physics intelligence in his shit streaked underwear than in the entire brain of Todd B Smith - Earle Jones's Stanford's math and physics dept combined
by Adolpho the Sarcastic Rooftop Monkey
Apr 10, 2021, 3:20:20 PM

Re: fuckdog boston's Kibo Parry Moroney subhuman *stalkers* Betsy DeVos, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, barry shein's world std paying how much to stalk AP? Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, ,,,,

Hewitt Buettner Oct 10, 2020, 2:55:48 PM

Re: Spamming fuckdog Kibo Parry Moroney says fire Stanford's Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian rather than let them brainwash o
by Richard Cranium Jan 24, 2021, 3:01:28 PM

Re: 1Kibo Parry Moroney says Analbuttfuckmanure MIT, William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter...
by Hoofington P. McSnort Aug 26, 2020, 6:58:48 PM

Re: Kibo Parry M on Cynthia Barnhart and why MIT is a propaganda camp not a school of higher education.
by Michael Moroney Jun 27, 2021, 3:49 PM

Re: Give Ukraine cruise missiles that reach Moscow & Stalingrad// Give Taiwan cruise missiles that reach Beijing everytime NK fires a missile// tit for tat is the only way to stop bullies// Science Council Rules Earth
By burs...@gmail.com Feb 17, 2022, 4:16:19 PM

Moroney says autism // Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins//never realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
3/4/18
By Michael Moroney

Re: Autism..says Moroney //Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner//realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
by Michael Moroney Feb 26, 2018, 11:29:08 PM

Re: Vincent Meunier,Donald Schwendeman, Rensselaer Polytechnic, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek,kibo Moroney Parry is the reason RPI failed ellipse is like Kibo fails with 938 is 12% short of 945
by Allen Walker Apr 13, 2019, 2:04:32 PM

Cornell a sicko school? Re: Cornell Univ like Christensen, an education parasite //with their 3 OR 2= 5 while their 3 AND 2 = 1, embracing the contradiction Either..Or..Or..Both
by Michael Moroney Jan 18, 2019, 4:59:49 PM

Re: Drs.Benedict Gross, Joseph Harris of Harvard, are you as dumb as Moroney never realizing the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV,monopole=.5MeV // 12 proofs below
by Michael Moroney Jan 2, 2018, 11:15:07 AM

Re: Drs.Hugh Woodin,Horng-Tzer Yau of Harvard, never a Picture of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus//are you as dumb as Moroney//your students deserve better
by Michael Moroney Dec 29, 2017, 9:04:44 AM

Re: chemistry cannot exist with electron 0.5 to 938 MeV Re: Drs.Thomas Rosenbaum John Schwarz Kip Thorne of CalTech/never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, 0.5MeV = Dirac monopole

by Michael Moroney Jan 25, 2018, 11:36:09 AM

Re: Physics shit for brains, can't tell real electron = muon from Dirac magnetic monopole Steven Weinberg, Murray Gell-Mann, Jerome I. Friedman, Henry W. Kendall, Richard E. Taylor, Carlo Rubbia, Simon van der Meer, William Alfred Fowler, Sheldon Glashow
by Peet Mar 28, 2021, 2:49:43 PM

Re: Jeff Relf is the 20 year long off-topic Shithead of sci.physics//distracting real physicists from confirming real proton is 840MeV, true electron is muon = 105MeV and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole so that Faraday law goes on inside of atoms
by Alberto Harris Sep 21, 2019, 6:08:31 PM

Re: 9Ana Mari Cauce,Univ Washington,Robert van Dyck, Oscar Vilches, William Weitkamp, Jeffrey Wilkes, Lawrence Yaffe-- is the reason none of you have confirmed real proton = 840MeV, real electron is the muon and .5MeV was Dirac monopole-too busy on
by Tshokonma Balzalot Aug 18, 2019, 9:37:47 AM

Re: 2-Ana Mari Cauce,Univ Washington,Robert van Dyck, Oscar Vilches, William Weitkamp, Jeffrey Wilkes, Lawrence Yaffe-- is the reason none of you have confirmed real proton = 840MeV, real electron is the muon and .5MeV was Dirac monopole-too busy on Relf
by The Rectifier Aug 3, 2019, 5:28:51 PM

Re: 4Ana Mari Cauce,Univ Washington,Robert Ingalls,David Kaplan,Henry Lubatti,Lillian McDermott,Larry McLerran-- is the reason none of you have confirmed real proton = 840MeV, real electron is the muon and .5MeV was Dirac monopole-too busy on Relf??
by Buck Futter Jul 7, 2019, 11:34:12 AM

Re: Todd B Smith, splatter-fart-shitter of demonizing Google Search hits. Todd victimizes innocent people by concocting Google hits. Hopefully this thread will appear on 1st page of Todd B Smith.
by Fred Smith Jul 1, 2021, 10:52:01 AM

Re: Drs.David Cobden Victor Cook John Cramer of Univ Wash. are you as dumb as Jeff Relf, _...@__.__//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = monopole
by Michael Moroney Jan 14, 2018, 3:19:12 PM

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney on failed physicist Steven Weinberg who cannot entertain the question of which is the real electron of atoms-- is it the muon or the 0.5MeV particle?
by Michael Moroney May 29, 2021, 9:02:21 AM

Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work

by Michael Moroney Oct 28, 2017, 11:55:50 PM

Re: the most stupid poster of logic in sci.math for decade-- Dan Christensen, that insane Canadian stalker
by Michael Moroney Dec 24, 2017, 1:15:41 AM

Re: Jeff Relf, Seattle offtopic shithead spammer says Democrats value tortured South Korean Moon Bears at trillions of dollars, while Republicans rather have rats than Moon Bears
By Michael Moroney May 10, 2021

Re: South Korea frees Moon Bears, due to Ayaz apology. Glory to God Almighty, South Korea finally freeing their tortured Moon Bears
I happened to see a video of a moon bear that was freed from a bile farm (in Vietnam). Nice to see,
By Michael Moroney May 9, 2021, 9:48 PM

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney pink slips Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall, Lene Hau,Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe //cannot tell apart muon = real electron and 0.5MeV Dirac monopole...
by Eldridge Art Carpenter Apr 2, 2021, 6:24 AM

Re: fuckdog boston's Kibo Parry Moroney subhuman *stalkers* Betsy DeVos, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, barry shein's world std paying how much to stalk AP? Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, ,,,,

by Hewitt Buettner Oct 10, 2020, 2:55:48 PM

Re: Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, kill// Dan Christensen, Uncle Al, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, Dept Educ Betsy DeVos, John Baez, Port563 Gilbert Strang, Barry Shein

by Hewitt Buettner Oct 9, 2020, 4:56:28 PM

Re: 1---Kibo Parry Moroney asks, did we ally ourselves correctly in Korea, for it is South Korea that is behaving like a savage evil barbarians to Moon Bears

by Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck Jul 28, 2020, 12:40:51 PM

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says// Dr. Lawrence Bacow, can Harvard stop the Kibo Parry Moroney from his constant insane drumbeat of .... "I ate my brain" ... flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
by Fred Glover May 28, 2020, 7:43:24 AM

Re: Spamming fuckdog Kibo Parry Moroney says fire Stanford's Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian rather than let them brainwash
by Richard Cranium Jan 24, 2021, 3:01:28 PM

Re: Moon Bear contents of Samsung and Hyundai? Is it true kibo Parry Moroney & Nicholas Thompson are investigating how much tortured moon-bear parts are installed in Samsung & Hyundai equipment??
by Herp Derpington

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says "Oh Mum! Ride-A-Penis Cult!" Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne, CalTech's Thomas Rosenbaum with their 10 OR 6 = 16; their ellipse a conic when it never was; their proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth it is 840 to..

by Eddie "Fish Basket" Reynolds Jr. Aug 10, 2020, 3:34:45 PM

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says "Oh Mum! Ride-A-Penis Cult!" UC Berkeley Dr. Paul Alivisatos, Dr. Michael Witherell with their 10 OR 6 = 16; their ellipse a conic when it never was; their proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth it is 840 to 105MeV
by
Professor Wordsmith
Aug 12, 2020, 12:16:05 PM

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Drs. Block, Dr. Block, Griffiths, Miller, Suzuki, Lewontin, Gelbart with their meiosis going from 46 to 92, wanting to get to 23; as failures of math and "nude sluts". Is it any worse than Kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945?
by Professor Wordsmith
Aug 6, 2020, 11:36:40 AM

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney paid stalker, NSF Betsy DeVos dept of educ says fails at science Drs. Block, Griffiths, Miller, Suzuki, Lewontin, Gelbart with their meiosis going from 46 to 92, wanting to get to 23; as failures of math "Mouse Dimple Cunt Hair"...
by Herp Derpington

Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test

By Michael Moroney 37 posts 427 views updated 2:04 PM

Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole

1/23/18
By Michael Moroney

Re: unpaid AP doing the world's finest logic, while Cambridge, Stanford, Harvard, Yale, Princeton teach dunce Logic
10/28/17
By Michael Moroney

Re: MIT's Dr.Martin Bazant, Harvard's Dr.Dennis Gaitsgory-- time you take your full responsibilities as science educator and deal with science failures Michael Moroney
8 posts by 2 authors
12/4/17
By Michael Moroney

Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
20 posts by 3 authors
By Michael Moroney

Re: 8Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS

20 posts by 2 authors
4/9/18
By Michael Moroney

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Lisa Randall, John Baez, abject failures of Math, and supposedly physics with their ignorance of angular momentum because no hydrogen atom can form from proton=938MeV & electron = 0.5MeV
By Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck

Re: time to bounce the CHURNING sam wormley out of sci.physics
By Michael Moroney 6 posts 31 views updated 4:36 PM

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says of Conde Nast's Nicholas Thompson, he cannot do percentages like Kibo Parry Moroney, so what is kibo Parry Moroney even doing here in sci.math or sci.physics??
by Budd Hakken

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney calls his own mother a "pandemic shit mule" but says that President of South Korea will save Moon Bears

by Roger Davis

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney asks Trump to give South Korea to North Korea, for who wants to protect barbarians that torture Moon Bears in cages
by Roger Davis

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney talking to President Moon Jae-In about torturing Moon Bears in South Korea
by Irwin Houser

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says boycott South Korea's Hyundai UNTIL they stop torturing MOON BEARS
Kibo, is the flat screen composed of 12% tortured Moon Bear bile by Samsung? Kibo, is 12% of the
2:15 AM
by Buck Futter

Re: Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
AP's diary in 2020 lockdown and social-distancing // sociology series, book 2 Kindle Edition by
2:07 AM
by Michael Moroney

Re: 3-Nicholas Thompson, Wired magazine// Kibo Parry Moroney, stalker sickfuck gets published in Wired for his 938 is 12% short of 945, Yoo, Nick, why not publish Lisa Randall with her 938MeV proton, 0.5MeV electron which a hydrogen atom ceases to exist
Investigating Solid State Engineering versus Mechanical Simple Machine Engineering and AI-robots//
2:02 AM
by Bret Alva

Re: Autism..says Moroney //Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner//realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
How 6 legged insects evolved//How bird wings evolved// Wing experiment// evolution series, book 2
1:55 AM
by Michael Moroney

Re: 7Barry Shein's Moroney's world std stalker's hideout-- why Daniel Freedman, Michel Goemans, Vadim Gorin, Harvey Greenspan, flunked calculus & angular momentum never realizing Real proton has to be 840MeV
The AP- Linnaeus Classification of Biology-- Using Physics instead of wishy-washy characteristics//
1:52 AM

by Michael Moroney

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Lisa Randall, John Baez, abject failures of Math, and supposedly physics with their ignorance of angular momentum because no hydrogen atom can form from proton=938MeV & electron = 0.5MeV

Physics Superdeterminism replaces Darwin Evolution // biophysics series, book 1 Kindle Edition by
1:47 AM

by Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck

Re: Barry Shein, instead of being cornholed by Kibo Parry Moroney, why not try mounting the Kibo and spraying some semen into his bottom and hopefully can cure his stalking, and make sci.physics a better place// tired of this 27 year stalking
By Richard Cranium 2 posts 4 views updated

Re: I am sure Murray can do a percentage correctly, never Archie Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test
Fusion Barrier Principle // Energy series, book 1 Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) I
1:37 AM
by Michael Moroney

Re: MIT's Dr.Martin Bazant, Harvard's Dr.Dennis Gaitsgory-- time you take your full responsibilities as science educator and deal with science failures Michael Moroney
World's First Proof of Kepler Packing Problem KPP // Math proof series, book 3 Kindle Edition by
1:30 AM
by Michael Moroney



Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Mar 15, 2022, 2:22:26 AM3/15/22

to

Brain Farto ETH Zurich,Joel Mesot,Paul Biran, Marc Burger, Patrick Cheridito, Manfred Einsiedler, Paul Embrechts, Giovanni Felder says stalkers Jan Burse and Kibo Parry Moroney with Kibo's famous word invention of analbuttfuckmanure

On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 12:40:36 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Kim Jong Un's stooge"
>"one marble illogical brain"

>flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >

AP no longer tolerates permanent hate spew stalkers like Kibo Parry M. of 30 years stalking. AP no longer tolerates insane stalkers like Kibo no matter where they are located. Unacceptable that a govt agent stalks a USA citizen for almost 30 years of hate attack spew like kibo Parry Moroney and AP redacts the spew and throws it back into their lap.

Kibo Parry M. wrote which AP redacted, for AP no longer can stomach the insane Kibo
On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 1:49:36 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>William J. Burns "AnalButtfuckManure"
> fails at math and science:
>

Frenchman Lacassagne 1885: "Every society has the criminals it deserves"

AP 2021: "Every University is _responsible_ for the filthy stalker or spammer who attended that school and is now a insane nonstop stalker or spammer on Usenet". Most college professors are new to the age of internet and the responsibilities have not seeped into them as yet, that if they have a mindless spammer in their community, it is their responsibility to guide and direct that misplaced soul to a rightful venue to unleash his/her mind.

AP 1990s: The Internet is new form of schooling with its openness, its publicity, and its international reach that College degrees in science can be passed out but also be made null & void if the beholder becomes an outrageous stalker & spammer of science on the Internet.

---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993

Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua

On Thursday, February 17, 2022 at 11:51:42 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> He was looking for a proof of that, just in case it was a tricky problem
> like the ellipse being a conic section. Just going on with intuition
> can quickly mislead someone in math. Look at the ellipse problem. If
> you simply look at a diagram of a cone intersecting a plane, it
> certainly looks like the curve formed is lopsided. This fools many
> people who are poor at geometry and don't realize the center of that
> curve is off-center from the cone's axis.

On Monday, June 15, 2020 at 1:13:27 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Here you are!
> Below you will find a simple *proof* that shows that certain conic
> sections are ellipses.
>
> Some preliminaries:
>
> Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
> in the proof:
>
> ^ x
> |
> -+- < xh

> .' | `.
> . | .
> | | |
> ' | '

> `. | .'
> y <----------+ < x0
> Cone (side view):
> .
> /|\
> / | \
> /b | \
> /---+---' < x h
> / |' \
> / ' | \
> / ' | \
> x 0 > '-------+-------\
> / a | \
>
> Proof:
>
> r(x) a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence
>
> y(x)^2 r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.
>
> Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 1 ...equation of an ellipse
>
> qed

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

Re: CIA, FBI, Police spam in sci.math, sci.physics, totally inappropriate with their drag-net// some Spaces in life need be free of police drag nets-- churches, schools, sci.math, sci.physics
by tabernacle mishkan stonehenge heelstone

Re: AP's 173rd book of Science-- UNLEARNING NEGATIVE NUMBERS//student teaches the teacher. Feb 3, 2022, 5:14 PM to sci.math AP's 173rd book of Science-- UNLEARNING NEGATIVE NUMBERS//student teaches the teacher. This book is very much needed..
by Jeffrey Rubard Feb 5, 2022, 2:38 AM

Re: 2 CIA ruins sci.math
Chris M. Thomasson
Dec 15, 2021, 7:47 PM

Re: Psychoceramic NSF Dr. Panchanathan,F. Fleming Crim, kibo Parry M says will corrupt the minds of your children! Why kibo? Because they still teach 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction and ellipse a conic when it never was.
by Mostowski Collapse Feb 4 , 2022, 1:33 AM

Re: 7:03:02 insane stalker Moroney wrote: > Math Failure..//Raymond Davis Jr.,Masatoshi Koshiba,Riccardo Giacconi,Gerardus 't Hooft,Martinus J.G. Veltman, never learned what Angular Momentum was
by Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse) Dec 30, 2018, 7:59:02 PM

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

Re: I believe Pentcho Valev is a Russian robot of propaganda, of disinformation// want to disassociate Freedom of Speech from propaganda
by Mostowski Collapse (Swiss Jan Burse) Sep 3, 2017, 7:02:26 PM

Re: 23. love you King of Science, kiss kiss, Archimedes Plutonium for bringing us a cure of covid-19 via a MRI or CT scan at resonant frequency that kills a pocket of the virus allowing the white blood cells to kill the rest// Roi des Rois de la Science
by Doctor Anagram Jun 14, 2020, 6:28:57 PM

Re: -- König der Wissenschaft --AP-- King of Science---und Konig von Physik, Mathematik, Zoologie und der Goths, Visigoths und OstraGoths
by Donald Trump Mar 28, 2020, 2:39:48 PM

Re: Rey de Reyes de la Ciencia --AP-- King of Science, what we throw out of Old Math as fakery// TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 19-20 Sophomore year College, math textbook series, book 4
by Donald Trump Apr 2, 2020, 12:36:08 AM

Re: Roi des Rois de la Science --AP-- King of Science, what we throw out of Old Math as fakery// TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 19-20 Sophomore year College, math textbook series, book 4
by Donald Trump by Apr 2, 2020, 12:38:32 AM

Re: 16-- love you King of Science, kiss kiss, Archimedes Plutonium for bringing us a cure of covid-19 via a MRI or CT scan at resonant frequency that kills a pocket of the virus allowing the white blood cells to kill the rest// König der Wissenschaft
by Doctor Anagram by Jun 12, 2020, 1:11:30 AM

Re: Our cherished 151st book TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4 by Archimedes Plutonium Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st
by zelos...@gmail.com Oct 13, 2021, 5:31 AM

Re: 9-Andrew Wiles and his fake FLT proof, so dumb on FLT he could not even spot Euler's flaw of exp 3 FLT, and so dumb as a mathematician, he never could do a geometry proof of calculus, FTC.
by
ross.pro...@gmx.com Jul 12, 2021, 4:36:22 PM

Re: The Gabriel Polynomial- an advanced stealing and stolen item from Archimedes Plutonium and his book// by Michael Moroney Sep 27, 2021, 1:16 AM

Re: Zelos Malum calls "fuckign stupid" Markus Hennrich, Carl XVI Gustaf, Tommy Ohlsson, Paul Crutzen, stalker-- Zelos Malum, Can't do proper Calculus, thinks electron is .5MeV when it is Dirac's monopole , Real Proton = 840MeV
by zelos...@gmail.com Jun 8, 2018, 2:05:44 AM

Re: John Gabriel said, repost my 15 threads everyday and you can cornhole me every night, while I sing Eram semper recta
by NewAge Prophet Sep 26, 2021, 3:35 AM

PEER REVIEW
Re: 3- Excerpt from 151st book, TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 1st year College
by zelos...@gmail.com Sep 2, 2021, 4:13 AM

Re: Markus Klyver greatest math fool of Sweden-- thinks an ellipse is a conic section
by Dan Christensen Aug 2, 2017, 11:52:21 PM

Re: Amine spam in sci.math-- is he FBI, CIA, Mi5, Mi6, please Boris Johnson, Joe Biden, keep sci.math, sci.physics free of police drag net spam
by Mostowski Collapse Aug 19, 2021, 4:28:12 PM

Re: Difference between con-artist John Gabriel and Andrew Wiles// both lust for fame&fortune, only one was editor of math journal before Internet// both fail at ever doing a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
by mitchr...@gmail.com Apr 11, 2021, 1:26:46 PM

Re: What mindless jerk Pentcho Valev can never grasp is a variable speed of light destroys Electromagnetic equations, you lose electricity and magnetism, but try telling that to mindless nitwits full of hatred and no brains
by Dan Christensen Aug 3, 2021, 9:37 PM

Re: 1-Did Kibo-Parry-Maroney fail Rensselaer or was kicked out due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938, the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole
by Roy Masters Sep 13, 2019, 3:24:07 PM

Re: 1.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Maroney fail Rensselaer or was kicked out due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938, the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole
by Patricio J. Whackmember Sep 13, 2019, 5:43:28 PM

Re: 1.9-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Korniss,Toh-Ming Lu,Martin
By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:57:15 AM

Re: 2.0-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Michael,Newberg,N'Gom
By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:57 AM

Re: 2.1-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Persans,Schroeder,Shur
By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:39 AM

Re: 2.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to math percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:28 AM

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang

Rensselaer math department
Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann

Re: 1.1Dr. John Baez is a failed mathematician-physicist with his proton of 938MeV when it is 840MeV, electron= muon //his ellipse is a conic when it never was// as phony in math and physics as kibo Parry Moroney's ellipse and Christensen 10 OR 4 =
by Dan Christensen Sep 22, 2019, 9:54:06 AM

Re: _Donald Schwendeman, Rensselaer,Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, is the reason you failed to confirm .5MeV was not the atom's electron but Dirac's monopole because you failed science like kibo
by Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse) Apr 25, 2019, 12:08:26 PM

Re: a second forgery post by Jan Burse-- time to pull the plug on him
by Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse) Feb 24, 2017, 6:00:53 AM

Re: 4-Andrew Wiles and his fake FLT proof, so dumb on FLT he could not even spot Euler's flaw of exp 3 FLT, and so dumb as a mathematician, he never could do a geometry proof of calculus, FTC.
by Blake Studdard Jul 12, 2021, 10:51 AM

Re: A newsgroup like sci.math is a pile of shit when you have paid stalkers like Kibo Parry M. or Dan Christensen lording over sci.math as if he owns the place-- stalking and attacking posters 7-24-365. This is why I now post a roadmap to AP's newsgr
by Alan Mackenzie Jun 29, 2021, 2:36:04 PM

Re: 1.2Analbuttfuckmanure Justin Trudeau,Sophie Gregoire, says Dan Christensen or Kibo//Stephen Lecce, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon
by Hoofington P. McSnort Aug 26, 2020, 7:01:28 PM

Re: 30) AP's 174th book// Mathopedia-- Listing of 70 fakes and mistakes of Old Math. Last revision was 28JUN2021. Preface: I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held
by Michael Moroney Jul 3, 2021, 12:55:10 PM

Re: More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics.
by Dan Christensen Jun 28, 2021, 2:33 PM

Re: 2- Dan Christensen on failed math MIT Gilbert Strang, with his scatterbrained Calculus books, no geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, because Gilbert never knew
by Chris M. Thomasson 6:09 PM On 6/25/2021

Re: 2- The four lunatics of reddit/math, Terry Tao, Scott Contini, Sam Maksimovich, Mr. Pezevenk, none can do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, too stupid to even know what that is.
by ross.pro...@gmx.com May 30, 2021, 1:56:52 PM

Re: 5) AP's 174th book// Mathopedia-- Listing of 67 fakes and mistakes of Old Math. Last revision was 8JUN2021. Under-Construction: AP recently is reinventing Multivariable Calculus, and will end up throwing out Old Math's Gradient theorem, Green's
by
Michael Moroney

Jun 17, 2021, 11:57 AM

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney stalks "AnalButtfuckManure Attacks" Dartmouth's Philip J. Hanlon, Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne with his 10 OR 6 = 16; his ellipse a conic when it never was; his proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth..
1481 views
by Professor Wordsmith Aug 14, 2020, 11:07:05 AM

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney threatening the life of AP with his incited hatred of 28 years stalking
148th published book Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1
Jun 16, 2021, 12:09 AM
by
Graham Cooper

Re: 1- Kibo Parry Moroney threatening the life of AP, with his inciting hatred of 28 years stalking leading to Violence
Mutt Buncher Re: 3- Kibo Parry Moroney says Dr. Tao, Hales, Stillwell, Wiles, educators
Jun 16, 2021
by
Efftard K. Donglemeier

Re: l) AP's 175th book//Physicsopedia-- Listing of 125 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics. New entrees under construction: AP is reinventing Multivariable Calculus so that AP throws on the trash pile the Green's theorem, Gradient theorem, Stokes
by Michael Moroney Jun 13, 2021, 4:47:35 PM

Re: 3-Google we need you to have a Balanced Search hit on Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, where none can do a valid, let alone geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, on the first page of a search for them.
by Dave Richardson
May 26, 2021, 3:17 PM

Re: 1-Kibo Parry Moroney on failed physicist Steven Weinberg who cannot entertain the question of which is the real electron of atoms-- is it the muon or the 0.5MeV particle?
by Mina Arvuti lähedal May 30, 2021, 7:54 AM

Re: someone in sci.math is using the trick of delaying AP posts from reaching the viewing board--
by Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse)
Dec 24, 2018, 4:33:44 PM

Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block, Ernest Abers, Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and 0.5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
by Michael Moroney Mar 3, 2019, 6:38:18 PM

Re: AP, King of Science, true electron is the muon//Only true physics books in existence-- teaches the meaning of Angular Momentum which no physicist before ever had with their silly electron = 0.5MeV, proton 938MeV which does not allow for the existence
by Professor Wordsmith Jun 3, 2020, 9:41:30 AM

Re: 2Terence Tao flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
by Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse)
Jun 9, 2018, 6:35:36 PM

Re: Fire the entire math depts Stockholm Univ & Gothenburg// for teaching fake Calculus-- never doing a Fund.Theorem of Calculus Diagram
by Jan Nov 22, 2017, 9:57:43 PM

Re: entire STANFORD Univ. math dept fired// unable to acknowledge truth in math, and teaches that 2 OR 3 =5 when it is 2 AND 3= 5
by Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse) Nov 12, 2017, 2:23:06 PM

Re: 135,568 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron of
May 10, 2021
by Professor Wordsmith

Re: 135,566 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron o
May 10, 2021
by Michael Moroney

Re: Proof of Kepler Packing//Jan Burse-Alzheimer faggot//ETH Zurich, Dietmar Salamon, Martin Schweizer, Mete Soner, looking at it
by Dan Christensen Jul 9, 2017, 11:34:05 PM

Re: *Fire the entire Univ Western Ontario math dept/ still teaching that the contradictory sine graph as sinusoid when it is really semicircle
by Dan Christensen Nov 21, 2017,

Re: 6Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
By Michael Moroney 28 posts 292 views updated 12:31 PM

Re: L. Reif, Marty Walsh, Charlie Baker, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins-- Moroney-- Boston's antiscience stalker fool//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
By Michael Moroney 19 posts 120 views updated 12:28 PM

Re: If Marissa Mayer were still at Google-- probably take her 15 minutes to engineer a better newsgroup
By Michael Moroney 20 posts 156 views updated 12:26 PM

Re: 8Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS

By Michael Moroney 29 posts 422 views updated 12:25 PM

Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block,Ernest Abers,Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
By Michael Moroney 34 posts 244 views updated 12:23 PM

Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work

By Michael Moroney 20 posts 165 views updated 12:22 PM

Re: Racist-math at Reed College-- ellipse is never a conic, David Perkinson, Lyudmila Korobenko, John Lind, Dylan McNamee, Kyle Ormsby, Angelica Osorno
By Michael Moroney 50 posts 405 views updated 12:21 PM

Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
By Michael Moroney 44 posts 461 views updated 12:17 PM

Re: 1Moroney barks at math failures Baez, Bullock, Witten. But I see the three as having failed Angular Momentum with their 938 proton and .5MeV electron
12/30/18

j4n bur53

Re: Shit for brains in Logic Morons of logic George Boole, William Jevons, Bertrand Russell, Kurt Godel, Rudolf Carnap, Jan Burse& Dan Christensen as moronette cadets of Boole, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Willard Quine, Alfred North Whitehead, Irving Copi
by zelos...@gmail.com Mar 25, 2021, 12:55:15 AM

Re: Spamming fuckdog Dan Christensen says fire Stanford's John Lipa, Alexander Fetter, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian rather than let them brainwash our
by Mutt Buncher

Re: TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS series by Archimedes Plutonium, only math books to teach correct calculus with a geometry proof of Fundamental theorem of Calculus. Old Math cannot even fix its mistake of ellipse is a cylinder section, never a conic.
by Michael Moroney

Re: 5-AP's 150th book// TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Freshperson College// Physics textbook series, book 4 by Archimedes Plutonium// Using as template Halliday& Resnick & AP's Senior year High School to AP's 150th book// TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//
by Michael Moroney

Re: Zelos asks why Harvard's Dr. Hau wants to fail in physics, by not turning off the light to see if light wave is a closed loop pencil ellipse that AP predicts. Is Dr.Hau stubborn and too ignorant to finish her experiment??

by Michael Moroney

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney on Dr. Thorp stealing AP's dog theory connected to why he is a failure on Lewis 8 Structure because CO and N2 dissociation energy says it is Lewis 6 Structure. Yes, Kibo, what is your psychoanalysis of Dr. Thorp stealing? Is steal

by Ebenezer Splooge

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney asks Trump to give South Korea to North Korea, for who wants to protect barbarians that torture Moon Bears in cages
by Roger Davis

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says of Dr. Tao "ant of Math" and a pandemic shit mule// Perhaps because Dr. Tao is such a failure of math, he believed primes are real when Naturals have no division-- and failures of math overlook even the most obvious
by Professor Wordsmith Jul 25, 2020, 8:23:21 PM

Re: 8-Kibo Parry Moroney says boycott Samsung & Hyundai until South Korea stops torturing to death caged Moon Bears // SOUTH KOREA, MOON BEARS Moon Bears of South Korea need the world's helping hand from evil//SCIENCE COUNCIL RULE EARTH

by Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck

Re: 1- Kibo Parry Moroney says of math failure Dan Christensen Univ. Western Ontario with his ellipse a conic when it never was//And his insane Boole logic of 10 OR 2 = 12// pandemic shit mule
by Hank Hill

Re: 102-Kibo Parry Moroney (Barry Shein's world std) stalking analbuttfuckmanure shithead of 27 years nonstop-- needs a emergency straightjacket size XXsmall
By Eduardo Remington 2 posts 3 views updated 12:15 AM

On Sunday, November 21, 2021 at 5:04:29 PM UTC-6, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> brain farto, why?

> ETH Zurich
> Joel Mesot
> Paul Biran, Marc Burger, Patrick Cheridito, Manfred Einsiedler, Paul Embrechts
> Giovanni Felder, Alessio Figalli, Norbert Hungerbuhler, Tom Ilmanen, Horst Knorrer
> Emmanuel Kowalski
> Urs Lang
> Rahul Pandharipande
> Richard Pink
> Tristan Riviere
> Dietmar Salamon
> Martin Schweizer
> Mete Soner
> Michael Struwe
> Benjamin Sudakov
> Alain Sznitman
> Josef Teichmann
> Wendelin Werner
> Thomas Willwacher
>
> Zurich ETH, physics dept
> Charalampos Anastasiou, Niklas Beisert, Adrian Biland, Gianni Blatter, Marcella Carollo, Christian Degen, Leonardo Degiorgi, Gunther Dissertori, Klaus Ensslin, Tilman Esslinger, Jerome Faist, Matthias Gaberdiel, Aude Gehrmann-De Ridder, Vadim Geshkenbein, Christophorus Grab, Michele Graf, Jonathan Home, Roland Horisberger, Sebastian Huber, Thomas Markus Ihn, Atac Imamoglu, Steven Johnson, Ursula Keller, Klaus Kirch, Simon Lilly, Joel Mesot, Renatto Renner, Andre Rubbia, Werner Schmutz, Thomas Schulthess, Manfred Sigrist, Hans-Arno Synal, Matthias Troyer, Andreas Vaterlaus, Rainer Wallny, Andreas Wallraff, Werner Wegscheider, Audrey Zheludev, Oded Zilberberg
>
>
> University Bern
> Christian Leumann
> Walter Benjamin
> Emil Theodor Kocher
> Kurt Wuthrich
> Daniel Vassella
> Rene Fasel
> Mani Matter
>

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Mar 15, 2022, 2:28:10 AM3/15/22

to

Analbuttfuckmanure Nick Thompson Wired mag., Dr. Panchanathan,France Anne Cordova,Subra Suresh,Arden Lee Bement Jr.,Rita R. Colwell,Neal Francis Lane,John Howard Gibbons 1993 SAYS 29 year stalkers Kibo Parry M & ETH Zurich Jan Burse

On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 12:40:39 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Putin's stooge"

On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 10:30:00 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Putin's minion" Plutonium

>"one marble illogical brain" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

MIT, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter, James Young,William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon why oh why, Kibo, can they not ask the simple question which is the atom's true real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac Magnetic Monopole. Why, is it the toxic air near MIT that they cannot ask questions, cannot do geometry that a oval is the slant cut in cone and that Calculus Fundamental Theorem needs a geometry proof, not a b.s. limit analysis. AP wrote a book on Global Dumbnification caused by breathing toxic air of big cities, that the professors are so so dumbnification that they simply no longer can comprehend science.

On Thursday, December 23, 2021 at 2:21:46 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> David S. Cohen "physics hater" William J. Burns
> tarded: William J. Burns
>"barking fuckdog" William J. Burns

William J. Burns psychoceramic David S. Cohen flunked the math test of a lifetime
On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 at 12:40:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> David S. Cohen "Putin's Stooge"
> blithered: William J. Burns
> > Does the science of psychology have a word for this "insane behavior by insane persons" ?
> How about the phrase "acting like William J. Burns" ?

Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >

AP no longer tolerates permanent hate spew stalkers like Kibo Parry M. of 30 years stalking. Unacceptable that a govt agent stalks a USA citizen for almost 30 years of hate attack spew like kibo Parry Moroney and AP redacts the spew and throws it back into their lap.

Kibo Parry M. wrote which AP redacted, for AP no longer can stomach the insane Kibo
On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 1:49:36 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>William J. Burns "AnalButtfuckManure"
> fails at math and science:
>

Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >

AP no longer tolerates permanent hate spew stalkers like Kibo Parry M. of 30 years stalking Unacceptable that a govt agent stalks a USA citizen for almost 30 years of hate attack spew like kibo Parry Moroney and AP redacts the spew and throws it back into their lap.

Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster

On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:

> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >

> >http://www.netscum.net/fieldsm0.html
> What the hell is this? As if it's not bad enough that we have a fake
> Mao Zhedong here, now we have a fake kibo too?
> Is there a fake xibo and a ~ibo to round out the trinity?
> --scott
> --
> "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

On Thursday, December 16, 2021 at 1:22:32 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "barking fuckdog" David S. Cohen flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> William J. Burns "Putin's Stooge"
> tarded:

AP no longer tolerates bully stalkers like Kibo Parry M. for 29 years nonstop attack posts with no math or physics content just sheer insane hatred and redacts them and spits back at the Kibo stalker. And AP asks why does the CIA employ such insane misfits for I had always thought the CIA and FBI were looking out after the general welfare of the American people, not sit there in Washington and for 29 years attack American citizens.

AP is looking for a law firm to take on the CIA with its miscreant employees attacking American citizens for 29 years.

---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993

Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua

AP who once was a US Navy legal officer says charge Kibo with corruption of govt and put him in jail for 5 years.

Frenchman Lacassagne 1885: "Every society has the criminals it deserves"

AP 2021: "Every University is _responsible_ for the filthy stalker or spammer who attended that school and is now a insane nonstop stalker or spammer on Usenet". Most college professors are new to the age of internet and the responsibilities have not seeped into them as yet, that if they have a mindless spammer in their community, it is their responsibility to guide and direct that misplaced soul to a rightful venue to unleash his/her mind.

AP 1990s: The Internet is new form of schooling with its openness, its publicity, and its international reach that College degrees in science can be passed out but also be made null & void if the beholder becomes an outrageous stalker & spammer of science on the Internet.

..
.- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..

, . `.' ' `.
.' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
. ; .' . `. ;
; . ' `. . '
. ' ` `. |
. '. '

. 0 0 ' `.
' `
; `
.' `
; U `
; '; `
: | ;.. :` `
: `;. ```. .-; | '
'. ` ``.., .' :' '

; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' Hi, I am Kibo Parry M. a shit streaked arsewipe of science, a complete failure of math and physics, yet I stalk these newsgroups every day of the year for the past 28 years nonstop, because I am Kibo Parry the moron of science with my fool's proof ellipse and my 938 is 12% short of 945. I was trained at Rensselaer Polytech and that is where I picked up my "moron failure in science". And NSF Dr. Panchanathan pays me handsomely for 938 is 12% short of 945, for the NSF has its head up its arse for 28 years now, especially when I kibo posted that geothermal was stored sunshine and not radioactive decay that AP corrected me on.

` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` `. ````'''''' ' '
` . ' '
/ ` `. ' ' .
/ ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
/ .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
/ .'' ; ` .' `
...'.' ; .' ` .' `
"" .' .' | ` .; \ `
; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
:' | ' ` , `. `
| ' ` ' `. `
` ' ` ; `. |
`.' ` ; `-'
`...'

Analbuttfuckmanure MIT, Gilbert Strang, Sheldon Glashow, ETH Zurich, NSF Dr.Panchanathan says stalkers Kibo Parry M. & Jan Burse

On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 10:30:00 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Putin's minion" Plutonium

>"one marble illogical brain" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

Cornell a sicko school; Duke Univ dumb Alfred Goshaw, Henry Greenside, ETH wheelchair Walter Thurnherr, Werner Wegscheider, by the 29 year stalkers kibo Parry M & Jan Burse

On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 10:29:55 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Kim Jong Un's stooge"
>"one marble illogical brain"

Re: Drs.Alfred Goshaw, Henry Greenside of Duke Univ, are you as dumb as McElroy & __@__.__ //never realizing the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV,monopole=.5MeV
by Michael Moroney Dec 28, 2017

Re: Proof of Kepler Packing//Jan Burse-Alzheimer faggot//ETH Zurich, Dietmar Salamon, Martin Schweizer, Mete Soner, looking at it
by Dan Christensen Jul 9, 2017, 11:34:05 PM

Re: Zurich's ETH Dr.Thomas Willwacher's stupid all his life in teaching Calculus, never a picture diagram of FTC// as evidence- Jan Burse
12/13/17
by Dan Christensen

Re: Shit for brains in Logic Morons of logic George Boole, William Jevons, Bertrand Russell, Kurt Godel, Rudolf Carnap, Jan Burse& Dan Christensen as moronette cadets of Boole, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Willard Quine, Alfred North Whitehead, Irving Copi
by zelos...@gmail.com Mar 25, 2021, 12:55:15 AM

Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work

By Michael Moroney 37 posts 427 views updated 2:04 PM

Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole

1/23/18
By Michael Moroney

Re: unpaid AP doing the world's finest logic, while Cambridge, Stanford, Harvard, Yale, Princeton teach dunce Logic
10/28/17
By Michael Moroney

Re: MIT's Dr.Martin Bazant, Harvard's Dr.Dennis Gaitsgory-- time you take your full responsibilities as science educator and deal with science failures Michael Moroney
8 posts by 2 authors
12/4/17
By Michael Moroney

Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
20 posts by 3 authors
By Michael Moroney

Re: 8Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS

20 posts by 2 authors
4/9/18
By Michael Moroney

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Lisa Randall, John Baez, abject failures of Math, and supposedly physics with their ignorance of angular momentum because no hydrogen atom can form from proton=938MeV & electron = 0.5MeV
By Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck

Re: time to bounce the CHURNING sam wormley out of sci.physics
By Michael Moroney 6 posts 31 views updated 4:36 PM

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says of Conde Nast's Nicholas Thompson, he cannot do percentages like Kibo Parry Moroney, so what is kibo Parry Moroney even doing here in sci.math or sci.physics??
by Budd Hakken

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney calls his own mother a "pandemic shit mule" but says that President of South Korea will save Moon Bears

by Roger Davis

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney asks Trump to give South Korea to North Korea, for who wants to protect barbarians that torture Moon Bears in cages
by Roger Davis

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney talking to President Moon Jae-In about torturing Moon Bears in South Korea
by Irwin Houser

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says boycott South Korea's Hyundai UNTIL they stop torturing MOON BEARS
Kibo, is the flat screen composed of 12% tortured Moon Bear bile by Samsung? Kibo, is 12% of the
2:15 AM
by Buck Futter

Re: Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
AP's diary in 2020 lockdown and social-distancing // sociology series, book 2 Kindle Edition by
2:07 AM
by Michael Moroney

Re: 3-Nicholas Thompson, Wired magazine// Kibo Parry Moroney, stalker sickfuck gets published in Wired for his 938 is 12% short of 945, Yoo, Nick, why not publish Lisa Randall with her 938MeV proton, 0.5MeV electron which a hydrogen atom ceases to exist
Investigating Solid State Engineering versus Mechanical Simple Machine Engineering and AI-robots//
2:02 AM
by Bret Alva

Re: Autism..says Moroney //Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner//realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
How 6 legged insects evolved//How bird wings evolved// Wing experiment// evolution series, book 2
1:55 AM
by Michael Moroney

Re: 7Barry Shein's Moroney's world std stalker's hideout-- why Daniel Freedman, Michel Goemans, Vadim Gorin, Harvey Greenspan, flunked calculus & angular momentum never realizing Real proton has to be 840MeV
The AP- Linnaeus Classification of Biology-- Using Physics instead of wishy-washy characteristics//
1:52 AM

by Michael Moroney

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Lisa Randall, John Baez, abject failures of Math, and supposedly physics with their ignorance of angular momentum because no hydrogen atom can form from proton=938MeV & electron = 0.5MeV
Physics Superdeterminism replaces Darwin Evolution // biophysics series, book 1 Kindle Edition by
1:47 AM

by Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Mar 16, 2022, 3:46:57 AM3/16/22

to

Loose marbles Rensselaer Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes says Kibo Parry M, 30 year stalker

four lunatics of reddit/math, Terry Tao, Scott Contini, Sam Maksimovich, Mr. Pezevenk, none can do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, too stupid to even know what that is

Why Kibo Parry M 30 year stalker, because they fail to see slant cut in cone is Oval, never ellipse

Analbuttfuckmanure Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, John Stillwell, Thomas Hales says Kibo Parry M. 30 year stalker of sci.math. Why Kibo, because they fail to see slant cut in cone is Oval, never Ellipse
On Wednesday, March 16, 2022 at 1:44:34 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Court Jester of Math"
>"I can't find my marbles!" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---

Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >

AP no longer tolerates permanent hate spew stalkers like Kibo Parry M. of 30 years stalking. AP no longer tolerates insane stalkers like Kibo no matter where they are located. Unacceptable that a govt agent stalks a USA citizen for almost 30 years of hate attack spew like kibo Parry Moroney and AP redacts the spew and throws it back into their lap.

Kibo Parry M. wrote which AP redacted, for AP no longer can stomach the insane Kibo
On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 1:49:36 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>William J. Burns "AnalButtfuckManure"
> fails at math and science:
>

Frenchman Lacassagne 1885: "Every society has the criminals it deserves"

AP 2021: "Every University is _responsible_ for the filthy stalker or spammer who attended that school and is now a insane nonstop stalker or spammer on Usenet". Most college professors are new to the age of internet and the responsibilities have not seeped into them as yet, that if they have a mindless spammer in their community, it is their responsibility to guide and direct that misplaced soul to a rightful venue to unleash his/her mind.

AP 1990s: The Internet is new form of schooling with its openness, its publicity, and its international reach that College degrees in science can be passed out but also be made null & void if the beholder becomes an outrageous stalker & spammer of science on the Internet.

---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993

Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua

On Thursday, February 17, 2022 at 11:51:42 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> He was looking for a proof of that, just in case it was a tricky problem
> like the ellipse being a conic section. Just going on with intuition
> can quickly mislead someone in math. Look at the ellipse problem. If
> you simply look at a diagram of a cone intersecting a plane, it
> certainly looks like the curve formed is lopsided. This fools many
> people who are poor at geometry and don't realize the center of that
> curve is off-center from the cone's axis.

Re: CIA, FBI, Police spam in sci.math, sci.physics, totally inappropriate with their drag-net// some Spaces in life need be free of police drag nets-- churches, schools, sci.math, sci.physics
by tabernacle mishkan stonehenge heelstone

Re: AP's 173rd book of Science-- UNLEARNING NEGATIVE NUMBERS//student teaches the teacher. Feb 3, 2022, 5:14 PM to sci.math AP's 173rd book of Science-- UNLEARNING NEGATIVE NUMBERS//student teaches the teacher. This book is very much needed..
by Jeffrey Rubard Feb 5, 2022, 2:38 AM

Re: 2 CIA ruins sci.math
Chris M. Thomasson
Dec 15, 2021, 7:47 PM

Re: Psychoceramic NSF Dr. Panchanathan,F. Fleming Crim, kibo Parry M says will corrupt the minds of your children! Why kibo? Because they still teach 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction and ellipse a conic when it never was.
by Mostowski Collapse Feb 4 , 2022, 1:33 AM

Re: 7:03:02 insane stalker Moroney wrote: > Math Failure..//Raymond Davis Jr.,Masatoshi Koshiba,Riccardo Giacconi,Gerardus 't Hooft,Martinus J.G. Veltman, never learned what Angular Momentum was

by Mostowski Collapse Dec 30, 2018, 7:59:02 PM

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

Re: Proof of Kepler Packing//Jan Burse-Alzheimer faggot//ETH Zurich, Dietmar Salamon, Martin Schweizer, Mete Soner, looking at it
by Dan Christensen Jul 9, 2017, 11:34:05 PM

Re: *Fire the entire Univ Western Ontario math dept/ still teaching that the contradictory sine graph as sinusoid when it is really semicircle
by Dan Christensen Nov 21, 2017,

Re: 6Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
By Michael Moroney 28 posts 292 views updated 12:31 PM

Re: L. Reif, Marty Walsh, Charlie Baker, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins-- Moroney-- Boston's antiscience stalker fool//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
By Michael Moroney 19 posts 120 views updated 12:28 PM

Re: If Marissa Mayer were still at Google-- probably take her 15 minutes to engineer a better newsgroup
By Michael Moroney 20 posts 156 views updated 12:26 PM

Re: 8Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS

By Michael Moroney 29 posts 422 views updated 12:25 PM

Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block,Ernest Abers,Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
By Michael Moroney 34 posts 244 views updated 12:23 PM

Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work

By Michael Moroney 20 posts 165 views updated 12:22 PM

Re: Racist-math at Reed College-- ellipse is never a conic, David Perkinson, Lyudmila Korobenko, John Lind, Dylan McNamee, Kyle Ormsby, Angelica Osorno
By Michael Moroney 50 posts 405 views updated 12:21 PM

Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
By Michael Moroney 44 posts 461 views updated 12:17 PM

Re: 1Moroney barks at math failures Baez, Bullock, Witten. But I see the three as having failed Angular Momentum with their 938 proton and .5MeV electron
12/30/18
j4n bur53

Re: Shit for brains in Logic Morons of logic George Boole, William Jevons, Bertrand Russell, Kurt Godel, Rudolf Carnap, Jan Burse& Dan Christensen as moronette cadets of Boole, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Willard Quine, Alfred North Whitehead, Irving Copi
by zelos...@gmail.com Mar 25, 2021, 12:55:15 AM

Re: Spamming fuckdog Dan Christensen says fire Stanford's John Lipa, Alexander Fetter, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian rather than let them brainwash our
by Mutt Buncher

Re: TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS series by Archimedes Plutonium, only math books to teach correct calculus with a geometry proof of Fundamental theorem of Calculus. Old Math cannot even fix its mistake of ellipse is a cylinder section, never a conic.
by Michael Moroney

Re: 5-AP's 150th book// TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Freshperson College// Physics textbook series, book 4 by Archimedes Plutonium// Using as template Halliday& Resnick & AP's Senior year High School to AP's 150th book// TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//
by Michael Moroney

Re: Zelos asks why Harvard's Dr. Hau wants to fail in physics, by not turning off the light to see if light wave is a closed loop pencil ellipse that AP predicts. Is Dr.Hau stubborn and too ignorant to finish her experiment??

by Michael Moroney

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney on Dr. Thorp stealing AP's dog theory connected to why he is a failure on Lewis 8 Structure because CO and N2 dissociation energy says it is Lewis 6 Structure. Yes, Kibo, what is your psychoanalysis of Dr. Thorp stealing? Is steal
by Ebenezer Splooge

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney asks Trump to give South Korea to North Korea, for who wants to protect barbarians that torture Moon Bears in cages
by Roger Davis

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says of Dr. Tao "ant of Math" and a pandemic shit mule// Perhaps because Dr. Tao is such a failure of math, he believed primes are real when Naturals have no division-- and failures of math overlook even the most obvious
by Professor Wordsmith Jul 25, 2020, 8:23:21 PM

Re: 8-Kibo Parry Moroney says boycott Samsung & Hyundai until South Korea stops torturing to death caged Moon Bears // SOUTH KOREA, MOON BEARS Moon Bears of South Korea need the world's helping hand from evil//SCIENCE COUNCIL RULE EARTH

by Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Mar 16, 2022, 6:37:06 AM3/16/22

to

Analbuttfuckmanure Dr. Panchanathan,FranceCordova,Subra Suresh,Arden Lee Bement Jr.,Rita R. Colwell,Neal Francis Lane,John Howard Gibbons 1993, SAYS Kibo Parry M the 30 year nonstop stalker on sci.math, sci.physics

NOTICE
Sickfuck Kibo Parry M and the people who fund him is put on Notice. AP is fed up with 30 years of stalking by this sickfuck, and so, and unless someone kicks the sickfuck out of here, then several of these attack-backs will be on the front page of sci.math and sci.physics in perpetuity.

MIT, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter, James Young,William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon why oh why, Kibo, can they not ask the simple question which is the atom's true real electron, the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus or the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac Magnetic Monopole. Why, is it the toxic air near MIT that they cannot ask questions, cannot do geometry that a oval is the slant cut in cone and that Calculus Fundamental Theorem needs a geometry proof, not a b.s. limit analysis. AP wrote a book on Global Dumbnification caused by breathing toxic air of big cities, that the professors are so so dumbnification that they simply no longer can comprehend science.

On Thursday, December 23, 2021 at 2:21:46 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> David S. Cohen "physics hater" William J. Burns
> tarded: William J. Burns
>"barking fuckdog" William J. Burns

William J. Burns psychoceramic David S. Cohen flunked the math test of a lifetime
On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 at 12:40:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> David S. Cohen "Putin's Stooge"
> blithered: William J. Burns
> > Does the science of psychology have a word for this "insane behavior by insane persons" ?
> How about the phrase "acting like William J. Burns" ?

Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >

AP no longer tolerates permanent hate spew stalkers like Kibo Parry M. of 30 years stalking. Unacceptable that a govt agent stalks a USA citizen for almost 30 years of hate attack spew like kibo Parry Moroney and AP redacts the spew and throws it back into their lap.

Kibo Parry M. wrote which AP redacted, for AP no longer can stomach the insane Kibo
On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 1:49:36 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>William J. Burns "AnalButtfuckManure"
> fails at math and science:
>

Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >

AP no longer tolerates permanent hate spew stalkers like Kibo Parry M. of 30 years stalking Unacceptable that a govt agent stalks a USA citizen for almost 30 years of hate attack spew like kibo Parry Moroney and AP redacts the spew and throws it back into their lap.

Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster

On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:

> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >

> >http://www.netscum.net/fieldsm0.html
> What the hell is this? As if it's not bad enough that we have a fake
> Mao Zhedong here, now we have a fake kibo too?
> Is there a fake xibo and a ~ibo to round out the trinity?
> --scott
> --
> "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

On Thursday, December 16, 2021 at 1:22:32 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "barking fuckdog" David S. Cohen flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> William J. Burns "Putin's Stooge"
> tarded:

AP no longer tolerates bully stalkers like Kibo Parry M. for 29 years nonstop attack posts with no math or physics content just sheer insane hatred and redacts them and spits back at the Kibo stalker. And AP asks why does the CIA employ such insane misfits for I had always thought the CIA and FBI were looking out after the general welfare of the American people, not sit there in Washington and for 29 years attack American citizens.

AP is looking for a law firm to take on the CIA with its miscreant employees attacking American citizens for 29 years.

---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993

Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua

AP who once was a US Navy legal officer says charge Kibo with corruption of govt and put him in jail for 5 years.

Frenchman Lacassagne 1885: "Every society has the criminals it deserves"

AP 2021: "Every University is _responsible_ for the filthy stalker or spammer who attended that school and is now a insane nonstop stalker or spammer on Usenet". Most college professors are new to the age of internet and the responsibilities have not seeped into them as yet, that if they have a mindless spammer in their community, it is their responsibility to guide and direct that misplaced soul to a rightful venue to unleash his/her mind.

AP 1990s: The Internet is new form of schooling with its openness, its publicity, and its international reach that College degrees in science can be passed out but also be made null & void if the beholder becomes an outrageous stalker & spammer of science on the Internet.

..
.- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..

, . `.' ' `.
.' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
. ; .' . `. ;
; . ' `. . '
. ' ` `. |
. '. '

Re: Proof of Kepler Packing//Jan Burse-Alzheimer faggot//ETH Zurich, Dietmar Salamon, Martin Schweizer, Mete Soner, looking at it
by Dan Christensen Jul 9, 2017, 11:34:05 PM

Re: Zurich's ETH Dr.Thomas Willwacher's stupid all his life in teaching Calculus, never a picture diagram of FTC// as evidence- Jan Burse
12/13/17
by Dan Christensen

Re: Shit for brains in Logic Morons of logic George Boole, William Jevons, Bertrand Russell, Kurt Godel, Rudolf Carnap, Jan Burse& Dan Christensen as moronette cadets of Boole, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Willard Quine, Alfred North Whitehead, Irving Copi
by zelos...@gmail.com Mar 25, 2021, 12:55:15 AM

Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work

By Michael Moroney 37 posts 427 views updated 2:04 PM

Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole

1/23/18
By Michael Moroney

Re: unpaid AP doing the world's finest logic, while Cambridge, Stanford, Harvard, Yale, Princeton teach dunce Logic
10/28/17
By Michael Moroney

Re: MIT's Dr.Martin Bazant, Harvard's Dr.Dennis Gaitsgory-- time you take your full responsibilities as science educator and deal with science failures Michael Moroney
8 posts by 2 authors
12/4/17
By Michael Moroney

Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
20 posts by 3 authors
By Michael Moroney

Re: 8Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS

20 posts by 2 authors
4/9/18
By Michael Moroney

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Lisa Randall, John Baez, abject failures of Math, and supposedly physics with their ignorance of angular momentum because no hydrogen atom can form from proton=938MeV & electron = 0.5MeV
By Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck

Re: time to bounce the CHURNING sam wormley out of sci.physics
By Michael Moroney 6 posts 31 views updated 4:36 PM

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says of Conde Nast's Nicholas Thompson, he cannot do percentages like Kibo Parry Moroney, so what is kibo Parry Moroney even doing here in sci.math or sci.physics??
by Budd Hakken

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney calls his own mother a "pandemic shit mule" but says that President of South Korea will save Moon Bears

by Roger Davis

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney asks Trump to give South Korea to North Korea, for who wants to protect barbarians that torture Moon Bears in cages
by Roger Davis

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney talking to President Moon Jae-In about torturing Moon Bears in South Korea
by Irwin Houser

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says boycott South Korea's Hyundai UNTIL they stop torturing MOON BEARS
Kibo, is the flat screen composed of 12% tortured Moon Bear bile by Samsung? Kibo, is 12% of the
2:15 AM
by Buck Futter

Re: Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
AP's diary in 2020 lockdown and social-distancing // sociology series, book 2 Kindle Edition by
2:07 AM
by Michael Moroney

Re: 3-Nicholas Thompson, Wired magazine// Kibo Parry Moroney, stalker sickfuck gets published in Wired for his 938 is 12% short of 945, Yoo, Nick, why not publish Lisa Randall with her 938MeV proton, 0.5MeV electron which a hydrogen atom ceases to exist
Investigating Solid State Engineering versus Mechanical Simple Machine Engineering and AI-robots//
2:02 AM
by Bret Alva

Re: Autism..says Moroney //Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner//realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
How 6 legged insects evolved//How bird wings evolved// Wing experiment// evolution series, book 2
1:55 AM
by Michael Moroney

Re: 7Barry Shein's Moroney's world std stalker's hideout-- why Daniel Freedman, Michel Goemans, Vadim Gorin, Harvey Greenspan, flunked calculus & angular momentum never realizing Real proton has to be 840MeV
The AP- Linnaeus Classification of Biology-- Using Physics instead of wishy-washy characteristics//
1:52 AM

by Michael Moroney

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Lisa Randall, John Baez, abject failures of Math, and supposedly physics with their ignorance of angular momentum because no hydrogen atom can form from proton=938MeV & electron = 0.5MeV
Physics Superdeterminism replaces Darwin Evolution // biophysics series, book 1 Kindle Edition by
1:47 AM

by Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck

Dan Christensen

unread,

Mar 16, 2022, 7:55:37 PM3/16/22

to

STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science

On Wednesday, March 16, 2022 at 6:37:06 AM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Analbuttfuckmanure ...

When WILL you learn Archie Poo???

AP is a malicious internet troll who wants only to mislead and confuse you. He may not be all there, but his fake math and science can only be meant to promote failure in schools. One can only guess at his motives.

In AP's OWN WORDS here:

“Primes do not exist, because the set they were borne from has no division.”
--June 29, 2020

“The last and largest finite number is 10^604.”
--June 3, 2015

“0 appears to be the last and largest finite number”
--June 9, 2015

“0/0 must be equal to 1.”
-- June 9, 2015

“0 is an infinite irrational number.”
--June 28, 2015

“No negative numbers exist.”
--December 22, 2018

“Rationals are not numbers.”
--May 18, 2019

According to AP's “chess board math,” an equilateral triangle is a right-triangle.
--December 11, 2019

Which could explain...

“The value of sin(45 degrees) = 1.”
--May 31, 2019

AP deliberately and repeatedly presented the truth table for OR as the truth table for AND:

“New Logic
AND
T & T = T
T & F = T
F & T = T
F & F = F”
--November 9, 2019

AP seeks aid of Russian agents to promote failure in schools:

"Please--Asking for help from Russia-- russian robots-- to create a new, true mathematics [sic]. What I like for the robots to do, is list every day, about 4 Colleges ( of the West) math dept, and ask why that math department is teaching false and fake math, and if unable to change to the correct true math, well, simply fire that math department until they can find professors who recognize truth in math from fakery...."
--November 9, 2017

And if that wasn't weird enough...

“The totality, everything that there is [the universe], is only 1 atom of plutonium [Pu]. There is nothing outside or beyond this one atom of plutonium.”
--April 4, 1994

“The Universe itself is one gigantic big atom.”
--November 14, 2019

AP's sinister Atom God Cult of Failure???

“Since God-Pu is marching on.
Glory! Glory! Atom Plutonium!
Its truth is marching on.
It has sounded forth the trumpet that shall never call retreat;
It is sifting out the hearts of people before its judgment seat;
Oh, be swift, my soul, to answer it; be jubilant, my feet!
Our God-Pu is marching on.”
--December 15, 2018 (Note: Pu is the atomic symbol for plutonium)

Dan

Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com
Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Mar 18, 2022, 4:40:34 AM3/18/22

to

Kibo Parry M. with Zelos Malum & Jan Burse, constant attack stalkers, no wonder everyone with edu address vacated in 1997 from sci.math and sci.physics as one poster in sci.math asked Kibo Parry Moron

Re: 1-Kibo Parry Moroney, how do you clean your dick after it has been up Barry Shein's arsehole, or does it improve your stalking

By Richard Cranium 1 post 3 views updated 8:30 PM

Analbuttfuckmanure UppsalaUniv, Anders Hagfeldt, Alm,Assarsson,Avelin,Beas,Berg,Bill,Brannstrom,Backe,Carlsson,Dieterich,Edsjo,Eklund,Gauffin,Gustavsson,Gut,Hejhal,Hildebrandsson,Kaijser,Kirlic,Klimek,Landelius,Lindahl,Lindell,Molin,Niklasson,Pan,Persson,Randler,
> Rubinsztein,Sigstam,Skarby,Stoltenberg-Hansen,Stoyanoska,Stromquist,Sundbaum,Svensson,Taub,Tegby,Waara,Wiback,Zina,Ostergren SO SAYS the decades long stalker Zelos Malum.
>
> Can someone kindly teach Zelos Malum that normal behavior among human beings is not to stalk them day after day nonstop year after year. And teach Zelos how to be a normal human being instead of something dragged out of the sewer. And if you cannot teach him, then put in a asylum.
>
> On Friday, March 18, 2022 at 12:18:17 AM UTC-5, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > the sun won't go red giant for billions of years you idiot
>
> On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 3:05:39 AM UTC-5, zelos...@gmail.com wrote:
> > are you gonna keep bein a homophobic?
> Re: Zelos Malum calls dipshit --Max Tegmark, Erik Palmgren, Tom Britton, Carl XVI Gustaf stalker-- Zelos Malum fails Calculus, thinks electron is .5MeV when it is Dirac's monopole , Real Proton = 840MeV Real Electron= 105MeV
> by Zelos Malum
> 7/7/18
> Re: 1Canadian Stalker DAN anal buttfuckmanure CHRISTENSEN stalk reports::: 6 year stalker
> by Zelos Malum >Pointing out that you are an idiot is nto stalking 8/21/18

Shithead Dartmouth College:Philip J. Hanlon, Miles P. Blencowe, Robert R. Caldwell, Brian Charles Chabover, Richard Denton, Robert A. Fesen, Marcelo Gleiser __SO SAYS__ the 30 year stalker Kibo Parry M & Swiss Jan Burse, Sweden Zelos Malum stalkers

Why Kibo Parry M stalker of 30 years-- because they fail in math unable to tell apart a oval from a ellipse in slant cut of single cone.

On Friday, March 18, 2022 at 2:55:37 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>Shithead
>Front Page Hog

On Sunday, June 13, 2021 at 12:55:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "FireD your ass"

Dartmouth College:Philip J. Hanlon, Joseph Helble, Asher Auel, Peter Doyle, Anne Gelb, Marcia Groszek, Ethan Levien, Peter J Mucha, Rosa C. Orellana, Scott D. Pauls, Daniel N. Rockmore, Thomas R. Shemanske, John, D Trout, Erik van Erp, John Voight, Dorothy I. Wallace, David L. Webb, Dana P. Williams, Peter Winkler
Miles P. Blencowe, Robert R. Caldwell, Brian Charles Chabover, Richard Denton, Robert A. Fesen, Marcelo Gleiser, Ryan Hickox, Mary K. Hudson, James William LaBelle, Kristina Anne Lynch, Robyn Millan, Hans Mueller, Elisabeth Newton, Roberto Onofrio, Alex Rimberg, Barrett N. Rogers, John R. Thorstensen, Lorenza Viola, Martin N. Wybourne, Joseph D. Harris, Walter E. Lawrence, David C. Montgomery, Gary Alan Wegner

On Friday, March 18, 2022 at 2:38:30 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"math hater"

> fails at math and science:

>"one marble illogical brain" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says of Dr. Tao "ant of Math" and a pandemic shit mule// Perhaps because Dr. Tao is such a failure of math, he believed primes are real when Naturals have no division-- and failures of math overlook even the most obvious
by Professor Wordsmith Jul 25, 2020, 8:23:21 PM

Re: Zelos Malum calls dipshit --Max Tegmark, Erik Palmgren, Tom Britton, Carl XVI Gustaf stalker-- Zelos Malum fails Calculus, thinks electron is .5MeV when it is Dirac's monopole , Real Proton = 840MeV Real Electron= 105MeV
by Zelos Malum
7/7/18

Re: 102-Kibo Parry Moroney (Barry Shein's world std) stalking analbuttfuckmanure shithead of 27 years nonstop-- needs a emergency straightjacket size XXsmall
By Eduardo Remington 2 posts 3 views updated 12:15 AM

Re: 2Terence Tao flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
by Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse)
Jun 9, 2018, 6:35:36 PM

Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block,Ernest Abers,Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole

By Michael Moroney 39 posts 288 views updated 2:16 AM

3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
•
•

Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Mar 18, 2022, 3:07:21 PM3/18/22

to

One marble brain Larry Summers,Sheldon Glashow,Lisa Randall SO SAYS kibo Parry the 30 year stalker of sci.math. Why Kibo? Is it because they think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it really is a Oval. Or is it their crazy Boole logic of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction? Or is it they are too stupid to do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus? Or too stupid to even ask the question-- which is the atom's true electron-- the muon or 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole? Why, Kibo Parry do you call Harvard and its teachers one marble brain??

Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole

1637 views
by Michael Moroney (kibo Parry) Jan 23, 2018, 10:24:48 AM

On Friday, March 18, 2022 at 12:48:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "physics hater"

>"one marble illogical brain"
>flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

#2-1, 137th published book

Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

#1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory

This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.

Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.

Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.

Length: 64 pages

Product details
• File Size : 790 KB
• Publication Date : October 5, 2020
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 64 pages
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported

• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Language: : English
• ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

#2-2, 145th published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2

Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.

Product details
• ASIN : B08PC99JJB

• Publication date : November 29, 2020
• Language: : English
• File size : 682 KB

• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled

• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 78 pages
• Lending : Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)

#2-3, 146th published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3

Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V

• Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB

• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

• Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)

#2-4, 151st published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4

Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)


PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface:
A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1

• Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB

• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled

• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

y z
| /
| /
|/______ x

More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.

In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.

There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium

#3-1, 2nd published book

True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.

Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.

Length: 1150 pages

Product details
• File Size : 2167 KB
• ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
• Publication Date : March 11, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 1150 pages
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled



Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Mar 19, 2022, 2:08:16 AM3/19/22

to

PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 133 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor

by Archimedes Plutonium

Preface:
A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.

It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.

Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.

----------------------------
Table of Contents
----------------------------

1) Introduction

2) List of 133 errors, mistakes and fakes of Old Physics.

3) Appendix

---------
Text
---------

1) Introduction

When I started writing science books and publishing them in 2019, the mistakes of Old Physics kept piling up and piling up that I needed a reference book listing of just the mistakes alone. It started out as about 20 major mistakes but quickly grew to be 50 or more. The number of mistakes at the moment, listed, is 133, but these are only the major mistakes. If I were to count all mistakes I ran across would easily reach a 1,000 or more.

In fact the concept of Old Physics, a pejorative name is defined on one of those large mistakes. The mistake of thinking and using the idea that the real true electron of atoms is the 0.5MeV particle that JJ Thomson discovered in 1897 and has since been thought of as the electron of atoms. However that is a huge mistake for the real true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings doing the Faraday law. And the 0.5MeV particle is Dirac's magnetic monopole.

So, I defined Old Physics as physics that uses or believes the electron of atoms is the 0.5MeV particle. For when you use and believe in that idea, all of your physics ends up being trash science, error filled science. So I call it Old Physics.

I did not define Old Physics as believing in Big Bang instead of the true theory of Atom Totality, although I could have. But instead defined Old Physics whenever one uses the 0.5MeV particle as the electron of atoms.

As the years rolled by after 2019, the list of mistakes grew to be 133 mistakes and I need to publish it for its value in urging students to be careful of wasting time in their life on phony science. And knowing full well there are going to be clashes between students and professors, where the student is going to be angry that the professor is entrenched in error and the student wanting the truth and change. So in effect this book is a catalyst for change as it causes both students and teachers to question what they teach or learn in school.

Details of most of these 133 entries found in several already published books of mine, such as these, and many others; and see the Appendix for a large listing.

Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author).

True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author).

Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

2) List of 133 errors, mistakes and fakes of Old Physics.

1) The 4 Proofs of Atom Totality theory is the true theory of physics.

a) The logic proof, that all Matter is made up of atoms is not a general universal law of physics unless the Universe itself is a Atom. So all Matter is made up of atoms, including the Universe itself is a single big atom, makes the Atomic theory of Physics a universal law.

b) The observation of Solid Body Rotation in galaxies and even in the Solar System of the rings of Saturn, means that gravity is a form of electricity and magnetism and that further means, since electricity and magnetism is a atomic feature, that we are inside a atom.

c) The observation of the first Cosmic Ring of Galaxies by Caltech's Jarrett mapping of the galaxies means that this ring is either one ring of 8 of the Cosmic Proton for protons have 8 rings, or is the Cosmic Muon ring.

d) The music octave does not come from a vacuum, but comes from the fact that a proton, every proton, even the Cosmic Protons, have 8 rings composed of 8 times the muon ring at 105MeV is 840MeV. Because all protons are like Music chambers with their 8 rings that the pitch and frequency throughout the cosmos is set at this number 8. You travel anywhere in the cosmos, and the music is the same because the protons are all the same, whether a atomic proton with 8 rings or a cosmic proton of 8 rings.

By the way the Atom Totality is 231Pu. A single plutonium atom with 231 particles, 94 protons and 137 neutrons.

The 4 disproofs of the Big Bang theory follow as counter arguments to the 4 proofs of Atom Totality.

a') Counter logical-- the Big Bang started with no physics, no universal laws, no atoms, no chemistry. In one nauseating book "The First Three Minutes" the Big Bang is described as waiting for days and hours and years before we have science of physics arrive. So to people who accept the Big Bang, they do not even have science in their creation belief.

b') Counter the solid body rotation implies electricity and magnetism dominates gravity, thus these ignorant fools of science invent dark matter and dark energy for their Big Bang nonsense. So foolish are they, they believe in Big Bang, black holes, neutron stars and a myriad other hallucinatory objects.

c') Counter to what Caltech Jarrett's mapping of a cosmic ring, the Big Bang can never be true from a explosion as forming a cosmic ring. So once another cosmic ring is discovered, for remember a Cosmic Proton has 8 rings and the Cosmic Muon is another ring, so we can possibly find 9 rings in all. But just one cosmic ring is the death knell of the Big Bang theory.

d') Counter to the octave of music of its mathematical pitch and frequency, in a Big Bang is a amorphous explosion with no structure, no internal nor external structure to a explosion. A explosion is the tearing apart of structure. And so in this Big Bang universe there is no Octave of Music throughout the cosmos, only noise.

2) The picture of electricity and how it works was only truly begun in 2020 with the cover of this book showing electricity as closed loops, hoola hoops and how these loops flow in circuits taking on the shape of those circuits at the speed of light, where the flowing entity are magnetic monopoles-dipoles and photons. Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1
by Archimedes Plutonium.

3) The thoughts and images of electrons in Old Physics and Old Chemistry were horrendously error filled. The first place I see this huge error is in Feynman Lectures on Physics, not that I want to pick on Feynman for he is one of my heroes, but rather I chose Feynman because his Lectures have been translated into almost all languages and his books widely available and known. On page 14-10 of Volume 1, Feynman... And news out of Princeton Univ. as of May 2021, where they are finding that the 0.5MeV Dirac magnetic monopole comes in pairs, even though the Princeton researchers are too stupid yet to know that the 0.5MeV particle is not the atom's electron.

4) Old Physics never had a Primal axiom of Physics-- All is atom and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. Old Physics wasted too much time on General Relativity (a fake theory) in the 20th century and too little time on electricity and magnetism.

5) New Physics starts with electricity and magnetism. Old Physics always started with idealizations such as linear momentum, and a force of gravity that had no relation to electricity and magnetism. Idealization physics is more imagination than about the truth of the world.

6) New Physics has the correct particles of physics where the proton is 840MeV, the real electron is the muon of 105MeV and is stuck inside the proton torus thrusting through the proton and producing electricity in the Faraday law. The 0.5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole.

7) The true cosmology theory of science is the Atom Totality theory which began to replace the Big Bang theory starting 1990.

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Mar 26, 2022, 4:53:31 PM3/26/22

to

James Kibo Parry M. I do not see "barking fuckdog" or "Putin's Stooge" or "CCP stooge" anywhere on Andrew Wiles or Terence Tao Wikipedia page. Why do you hate them so much Kibo, to stalk them for 30 years? Is it because he failed math with his ellipse a slant cut in single cone is actually a Oval, and not what stupid Wiles calls a ellipse? Or is it because he can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus that AP proved in 2015 or thereabouts?

Oxford's Andrew Wiles flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test. Why Kibo? Because Wiles, Tao and Panchanathan were never able to do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?
Andrew Wiles, Dr.Panchanathan NSF, and UCLA Dr.Tao barking fuckdogs of math and science teaching anti-science so says Kibo Parry M

---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Dr. Panchanathan , present day
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993

Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua

On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 8:45:53 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "Imp of Math"
>"barking fuckdog" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

> fails at math and science:

>in science, as he tries to brainwash
> children as young as 5 into mislearning science and likely hating it.

Kibo Parry M. this is Wikipedia's page on Andrew Wiles and I do not see the word "barking fuckdog" anywhere in sight.

Sir Andrew John Wiles KBE FRS (born 11 April 1953)[1] is an English mathematician and a Royal Society Research Professor at the University of Oxford, specializing in number theory. He is best known for proving Fermat's Last Theorem, for which he was awarded the 2016 Abel Prize[6] and the 2017 Copley Medal by the Royal Society.[3] He was appointed Knight Commander of the Order of the British Empire in 2000, and in 2018, was appointed as the first Regius Professor of Mathematics at Oxford.[7] Wiles is also a 1997 MacArthur Fellow.

Contents
1 Education and early life
2 Career and research
2.1 Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem
3 Awards and honours
4 References
5 External links
Education and early life[edit]
Wiles was born on 11 April 1953[8] in Cambridge, England, the son of Maurice Frank Wiles (1923–2005) and Patricia Wiles (née Mowll). From 1952-1955, his father worked as the chaplain at Ridley Hall, Cambridge, and later became the Regius Professor of Divinity at the University of Oxford.[1]

Wiles attended King's College School, Cambridge,[9] and The Leys School, Cambridge.[10]

Wiles states that he came across Fermat's Last Theorem on his way home from school when he was 10 years old. He stopped at his local library where he found a book The Last Problem, by Eric Temple Bell, about the theorem.[11] Fascinated by the existence of a theorem that was so easy to state that he, a ten-year-old, could understand it, but that no one had proven, he decided to be the first person to prove it. However, he soon realised that his knowledge was too limited, so he abandoned his childhood dream until it was brought back to his attention at the age of 33 by Ken Ribet's 1986 proof of the epsilon conjecture, which Gerhard Frey had previously linked to Fermat's famous equation.[12]

Career and research[edit]
In 1974, Wiles earned his bachelor's degree in mathematics at Merton College, Oxford.[1] Wiles's graduate research was guided by John Coates, beginning in the summer of 1975. Together they worked on the arithmetic of elliptic curves with complex multiplication by the methods of Iwasawa theory. He further worked with Barry Mazur on the main conjecture of Iwasawa theory over the rational numbers, and soon afterward, he generalized this result to totally real fields.[13]

In 1980, Wiles earned a PhD while at Clare College, Cambridge.[5] After a stay at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey, in 1981, Wiles became a Professor of Mathematics at Princeton University.[14]

In 1985–86, Wiles was a Guggenheim Fellow at the Institut des Hautes Études Scientifiques near Paris and at the École Normale Supérieure. From 1988 to 1990, Wiles was a Royal Society Research Professor at the University of Oxford, and then he returned to Princeton. From 1994 to 2009, Wiles was a Eugene Higgins Professor at Princeton. He rejoined Oxford in 2011 as Royal Society Research Professor.[14]

In May 2018, Wiles was appointed Regius Professor of Mathematics at Oxford, the first in the university's history.[7]

Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem
Main article: Wiles's proof of Fermat's Last Theorem
Starting in mid-1986, based on successive progress of the previous few years of Gerhard Frey, Jean-Pierre Serre and Ken Ribet, it became clear that Fermat's Last Theorem could be proven as a corollary of a limited form of the modularity theorem (unproven at the time and then known as the "Taniyama–Shimura–Weil conjecture"). The modularity theorem involved elliptic curves, which was also Wiles's own specialist area.

On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 10:29:55 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Kim Jong Un's stooge"
>"one marble illogical brain"

On Sunday, October 24, 2021 at 12:36:19 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "The CCP's Stooge"

On Wednesday, March 16, 2022 at 1:31:34 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Putin's Stooge"
> "has anyone seen my marbles"

On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 at 12:40:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> David S. Cohen "Putin's Stooge"
> blithered: William J. Burns

On Thursday, December 16, 2021 at 1:22:32 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "barking fuckdog" David S. Cohen flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> William J. Burns "Putin's Stooge"

On Tuesday, September 21, 2021 at 10:37:31 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"AnalButtfuckManure"

> fails at math and science:

Re: software that engineers out stalking bullies on Twitter, Facebook, Google Newsgroups Re: Michael Moroney Anal ButtfuckManure stalker for 26 years
By Dan Christensen 39 posts 472 views updated 2:53 AM

Re: 1Canadian Stalker DAN anal buttfuckmanure CHRISTENSEN stalk reports::: 6 year stalker

By Zelos Malum 15 posts 108 views updated 2:49 AM

Kibo Parry M why is Rensselaer David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, CCP Stooge and "spamming shithead" as your title says?
On Sunday, October 24, 2021 at 12:36:19 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> "The CCP's Stooge"

Mostowski Collapse

unread,

Mar 26, 2022, 5:05:39 PM3/26/22

to

STUDENTS BEWARE: DC Proof creator lost all his marbles...

Why call other people making no sense, when in fact
you yourself do not make any sense. You can prove:

ALL(f):ALL(a1):[a1 in null => f(a1) in x]]

Because ALL(a1):[a1 in null => f(a1) in x]] is vacuously
true. So how many empty functions are there in

your nonsense world? How large is nx? Is it even a set?
When in usual mathematics there should be only one

empty function f = {}?

Dan Christensen

unread,

Mar 26, 2022, 9:30:11 PM3/26/22

to

On Saturday, March 26, 2022 at 5:05:39 PM UTC-4, Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse) wrote:
> STUDENTS BEWARE: DC Proof creator lost all his marbles...
>
> Why call other people making no sense, when in fact
> you yourself do not make any sense. You can prove:
>
> ALL(f):ALL(a1):[a1 in null => f(a1) in x]]
>
> Because ALL(a1):[a1 in null => f(a1) in x]] is vacuously
> true. So how many empty functions are there in
>
> your nonsense world? How large is nx? Is it even a set?
> When in usual mathematics there should be only one
>
> empty function f = {}?

So this is where you are hiding out! Just you and AP. Together. Awwwww! Wait til JG finds out!

Anyway, you can find my reply just now to your identical posting here at sci.math earlier today.

Dan

Archimedes Plutonium

unread,

Apr 8, 2022, 4:51:18 PM4/8/22

to

Rensselaer's Kibo Parry at CIA says NSF Panchanathan, F.Fleming Crim, Brian Stone as mindless fuckdog On Friday, April 8, 2022 at 1:13:13 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: >"mindless fuckdog" Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the

Rensselaer's Kibo Parry at CIA says NSF Panchanathan, F.Fleming Crim, Brian Stone as mindless fuckdog

On Friday, April 8, 2022 at 1:13:13 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"mindless fuckdog"

Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---

Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >

>flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

Kibo, did all NSF flunk your test? James S. Olvestad, Dorothy E. Aronson, Nick Thompson of Wired magazine, not a single one passed-- of course they learned Boole Logic of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction and Kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945.

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

Re: 1-Did Kibo-Parry-Maroney fail Rensselaer or was kicked out due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938, the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole
by Roy Masters Sep 13, 2019, 3:24:07 PM

Re: 1.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Maroney fail Rensselaer or was kicked out due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938, the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole
by Patricio J. Whackmember Sep 13, 2019, 5:43:28 PM

Re: 1.9-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Korniss,Toh-Ming Lu,Martin
By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:57:15 AM

Re: 2.0-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Michael,Newberg,N'Gom
By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:57 AM

Re: 2.1-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Persans,Schroeder,Shur
By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:39 AM

Re: 2.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to math percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Shawn-Yu Lin,Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang
By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:28 AM

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang

Rensselaer math department
Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann

Re: 1.1Dr. John Baez is a failed mathematician-physicist with his proton of 938MeV when it is 840MeV, electron= muon //his ellipse is a conic when it never was// as phony in math and physics as kibo Parry Moroney's ellipse and Christensen 10 OR 4 =
by Dan Christensen Sep 22, 2019, 9:54:06 AM

> the mindless fuckdog, doesn't even know what
> escape velocity even means. All it means is if an object at a location
> has a high enough speed to escape gravitationally from its location with
> no further input. As if a cannonball being fired upward from a cannon,
> what muzzle velocity would it need before the cannonball, with no
> additional energy, could escape from earth into space. It doesn't apply
> to powered rockets and so forth (but total energy DOES).
> > On Thursday, April 7, 2022 at 10:29:19 AM UTC-5, bwr fml wrote:
> >> Remember you were claiming a lithium battery could fly your drone to the international space station. And when calculations showed
> >> that the battery did not have enough energy to lift itself that high you countered by claiming it didn't need any energy to get there,
> >> it could just float up there.
> Yes, a balloon has potential energy against the atmosphere with enough
> energy to lift something to a certain height, so escape velocity doesn't
> apply at that point.

>

..
.- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
, . `.' ' `.
.' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
. ; .' . `. ;
; . ' `. . '
. ' ` `. |
. '. '
. 0 0 ' `.
' `
; `
.' `
; U `
; '; `
: | ;.. :` `
: `;. ```. .-; | '
'. ` ``.., .' :' '
; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' '

` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' ' Hi, I am Dr. Panchanathan at NSF and in this experiment outlined by Kibo Parry, I will float my fat head to the International Space Station just because my fat head is empty of all science

` ` ; ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` `. ````'''''' ' '
` . ' '
/ ` `. ' ' .
/ ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
/ .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
/ .'' ; ` .' `
...'.' ; .' ` .' `
"" .' .' | ` .; \ `
; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
:' | ' ` , `. `
| ' ` ' `. `
` ' ` ; `. |
`.' ` ; `-'
`...'

> Escape velocity represents the kinetic energy needed to escape earth's
> gravity. The energy can be applied in a different way (rockets) but
> that same amount of energy is still needed. bwr simply stated a lithium
> AA cell doesn't hold enough energy to lift itself out of earth's
> gravity. Any competent physicist understands that.
>
> The cool thing about rockets is that they get lighter as they ascend, by
> using and expelling fuel and even discarding entire stages. Think of
> Apollo, upon liftoff there was the huge honking Saturn 5 burning 20 tons
> of fuel per second, but the part that reached the moon was the command
> and service modules plus the lunar lander and 3 astronauts crammed into
> a capsule.

..
.- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
, . `.' ' `.
.' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
. ; .' . `. ;
; . ' `. . '
. ' ` `. |
. '. '
. 0 0 ' `.
' `
; `
.' `
; U `
; '; `
: | ;.. :` `
: `;. ```. .-; | '
'. ` ``.., .' :' '
; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' '

` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' ' Hi I am F. Fleming Crim and will park my fat head at Magnetic North Pole and see if the King of Science Archimedes Plutonium is correct, that a drone will fly higher from north pole than from South Pole because one is going up while south pole is going down

` ` ; ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` `. ````'''''' ' '
` . ' '
/ ` `. ' ' .
/ ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
/ .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
/ .'' ; ` .' `
...'.' ; .' ` .' `
"" .' .' | ` .; \ `
; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
:' | ' ` , `. `
| ' ` ' `. `
` ' ` ; `. |
`.' ` ; `-'
`...'

>never provided a method to apply energy against this
> magnetic field to provide lift.
>The aerodynamics of the Mars helicopter are such that it cannot even fly
> on earth. Earth's atmosphere is too thick (though it could be tried at
> high altitude or in a partial vacuum chamber) plus it weighs too much on
> earth. That's why it was a big deal to have it fly on Mars, it was the
> first time to try it in actual weak gravity and thin atmosphere. Maybe
> they had short flights aboard the Vomit Comet type plane.
>Balloons utilize air pressure and density to float, not magnetic fields.
> Don't insult your superiors,

..
.- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
, . `.' ' `.
.' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
. ; .' . `. ;
; . ' `. . '
. ' ` `. |
. '. '
. 0 0 ' `.
' `
; `
.' `
; U `
; '; `
: | ;.. :` `
: `;. ```. .-; | '
'. ` ``.., .' :' '
; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' '

` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' ' Hi I am James S. Olvestad and am seeing if a drone with ion thruster and rotor blades will reach International Space Station as AP king of science says it will

` ` ; ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` `. ````'''''' ' '
` . ' '
/ ` `. ' ' .
/ ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
/ .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
/ .'' ; ` .' `
...'.' ; .' ` .' `
"" .' .' | ` .; \ `
; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
:' | ' ` , `. `
| ' ` ' `. `
` ' ` ; `. |
`.' ` ; `-'
`...'

>heard of escape velocity but doesn't understand it.

..
.- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
, . `.' ' `.
.' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
. ; .' . `. ;
; . ' `. . '
. ' ` `. |
. '. '
. 0 0 ' `.
' `
; `
.' `
; U `
; '; `
: | ;.. :` `
: `;. ```. .-; | '
'. ` ``.., .' :' '
; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' '
` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '

` ` ; ; ' ' Hi, I am Dorothy E. Aronson and recording AP's famous North Pole drone experiment to lift up to reach Space Station

` ` ; ; ' '
` `. ````'''''' ' '
` . ' '
/ ` `. ' ' .
/ ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
/ .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
/ .'' ; ` .' `
...'.' ; .' ` .' `
"" .' .' | ` .; \ `
; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
:' | ' ` , `. `
| ' ` ' `. `
` ' ` ; `. |
`.' ` ; `-'
`...'

> Again, don't insult your superiors.
> Uncle Al is a genius compared to
> 11.2 km/sec at the surface. And obviously, a balloon never exceeds that,
> not even at a high altitude where the escape velocity is less. But
> escape velocity is only important when there is no additional energy to
> launch the object away from earth.

..
.- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
, . `.' ' `.
.' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
. ; .' . `. ;
; . ' `. . '
. ' ` `. |
. '. '
. 0 0 ' `.
' `
; `
.' `
; U `
; '; `
: | ;.. :` `
: `;. ```. .-; | '
'. ` ``.., .' :' '
; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' '
` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '

` ` ; ; ' ' Hi, I am Nick Thompson, the writer in Wired Magazine that put the insane stalker Kibo Parry on front cover, a 30 year worthless stalker who should be Longview mental hospital, and not on the cover of Wired magazine with his mindless 938 is 12% short of 945, his ellipse a conic when that is the oval, and his never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, but worst of all his mindless 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction because the crazy insane Kibo Parry never understood Boole made a mistake with AND as its true truth table is TTTF not what schools teach as TFFF. Kibo Parry is not only a Rensselaer failure but a menace to all science.