Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Bassam Karzeddin is dead
484 views
Skip to first unread message
marij...@gmail.com
Jun 20, 2019, 3:22:53 PM6/20/19
to
Hi there again!
I finished my exams and came back here to read new interesting things. However, I think teacher Bassam King Karzeddin is dead and now a bot is in charge of his account. He talks mainly to himself, with less sense that he used to have, and doesn't seem to read anything at all of what others are writing (half of his posts are blamk!!).
I'm so sorry. Rest In Peace, Mr. Karzeddin.
Mari
I finished my exams and came back here to read new interesting things. However, I think teacher Bassam King Karzeddin is dead and now a bot is in charge of his account. He talks mainly to himself, with less sense that he used to have, and doesn't seem to read anything at all of what others are writing (half of his posts are blamk!!).
I'm so sorry. Rest In Peace, Mr. Karzeddin.
Mari
Jens Stuckelberger
Jun 20, 2019, 4:29:51 PM6/20/19
to
On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 12:22:45 -0700, marijocemi wrote:
> Hi there again!
>
> I finished my exams and came back here to read new interesting things.
> However, I think teacher Bassam King Karzeddin is dead and now a bot is
> in charge of his account.
I thought it was a mindless bot from day one.
> Hi there again!
>
> I finished my exams and came back here to read new interesting things.
> However, I think teacher Bassam King Karzeddin is dead and now a bot is
> in charge of his account.
bassam king karzeddin
Jun 22, 2019, 3:45:26 AM6/22/19
to
On Thursday, June 20, 2019 at 10:22:53 PM UTC+3, marij...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi there again!
>
> I finished my exams and came back here to read new interesting things. However, I think teacher Bassam King Karzeddin is dead
Really, what a devilish school girl you are? wonder!
> Hi there again!
>
> I finished my exams and came back here to read new interesting things. However, I think teacher Bassam King Karzeddin is dead
You are spreading deadly gossips about me where I'm still alive and writing as you are reading for sure
Or do you want the professional mathematicians to feel happy by announcing me being *DEAD*? Wonder!
But "Death" itself isn't any shame since everybody would soon or later face it and what remains truly here is your "deeds", so even we die but the stronger voices and words never die forever and for sure
> and now a bot is in charge of his account.
>He talks mainly to himself, with less sense that he used to have, and doesn't seem to read anything at all of what others are writing (half of his posts are blamk!!).
>
> I'm so sorry. Rest In Peace, Mr. Karzeddin.
>
> Mari
I'm really Resting in Peace wither alive or dead since nothing ever more enjoyable or more intellectual than disclosing the deepest old and rooted-inherited ignorance among the top-most alleged genius people ever born on earth and in particular issues ever turned them so confused, FOR SURE
BKK
marij...@gmail.com
Jun 22, 2019, 6:05:14 AM6/22/19
to
El dissabte, 22 juny de 2019 9:45:26 UTC+2, bassam king karzeddin va escriure:
> Or do you want the professional mathematicians to feel happy by announcing me being *DEAD*? Wonder!
> But "Death" itself isn't any shame since everybody would soon or later face it and what remains truly here is your "deeds", so even we die but the stronger voices and words never die forever and for sure
>
Don't be ashamed, you bot. Your Master Bassam is dead but don't feel sorry or ashamed (unless you killed him, of course, then feel guilty).
> > and now a bot is in charge of his account.
>
> Wonder how?
>
Wonder? For sure!
> >He talks mainly to himself, with less sense that he used to have, and doesn't seem to read anything at all of what others are writing (half of his posts are blamk!!).
>
> Believe it, once you grow up a little more, you would certainly find the second half of my posts are also true FOR SURE
>
When I was younger I trusted you, and you lied to me, and showed you don't have the bare minimum idea of what you talk about. For THIS you should be ashamed.
> On Thursday, June 20, 2019 at 10:22:53 PM UTC+3, marij...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Hi there again!
> >
> > I finished my exams and came back here to read new interesting things. However, I think teacher Bassam King Karzeddin is dead
>
> Really, what a devilish school girl you are? wonder!
> You are spreading deadly gossips about me where I'm still alive and writing as you are reading for sure
>
Mmmm, how can we know you are not a bot? That's exactly what a bot would say! Until further proof is provided, Bassam is dead and you are a bot. Cannot deceive anyone, you bot!
> > Hi there again!
> >
> > I finished my exams and came back here to read new interesting things. However, I think teacher Bassam King Karzeddin is dead
>
> Really, what a devilish school girl you are? wonder!
> You are spreading deadly gossips about me where I'm still alive and writing as you are reading for sure
>
> Or do you want the professional mathematicians to feel happy by announcing me being *DEAD*? Wonder!
> But "Death" itself isn't any shame since everybody would soon or later face it and what remains truly here is your "deeds", so even we die but the stronger voices and words never die forever and for sure
>
> > and now a bot is in charge of his account.
>
> Wonder how?
>
> >He talks mainly to himself, with less sense that he used to have, and doesn't seem to read anything at all of what others are writing (half of his posts are blamk!!).
>
> Believe it, once you grow up a little more, you would certainly find the second half of my posts are also true FOR SURE
>
Me
Jun 22, 2019, 6:33:17 AM6/22/19
to
On Saturday, June 22, 2019 at 12:05:14 PM UTC+2, marij...@gmail.com wrote:
> you don't have the bare minimum idea of what you talk about.
That's indeed the case. Actually, he's a rather typical crank.
> you don't have the bare minimum idea of what you talk about.
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crank_(person)
bassam king karzeddin
Jun 22, 2019, 8:19:25 AM6/22/19
to
On Thursday, June 20, 2019 at 10:22:53 PM UTC+3, marij...@gmail.com wrote:
Or did you see them refuting my recent challenge with imaginary numbers? wonder!
Or can **YOU** too? please do
He is a traditional common *TROLL* like many other astray millions who are refusing very **STUBBORNLY** to learn
Those are merely the guards of **IGNORANCE**, which is why they have to keep ** MASKs** cowardly upon their **NO** names as if any truly alleged big names in mathematics are of any importance in **TODAY's** world in comparison of any random category say for instance like the football world,
where only a skilled footballer boy only (not necessarily the best) from anywhere in today's world is much more worth than all the mathematician's production in a full century, FOR SURE
And if you still have any little doubt, just give any numerical equation you may imagine, where I would show you immediately to rewrite it in its **original natural and sensible** form, where neither zero nor negative is at all needed
Just try in order to understand it, sure,
and if you don't like the mere facts, then keep away
BKK
j4n bur53
Jun 22, 2019, 8:20:41 AM6/22/19
to
I heard he was run over by an infinite bus.
Me
Jun 22, 2019, 9:35:34 AM6/22/19
to
On Saturday, June 22, 2019 at 2:20:41 PM UTC+2, j4n bur53 wrote:
> I heard he was run over by an infinite bus.
Nope, he was killed by a piece of rationality.
> I heard he was run over by an infinite bus.
bassam king karzeddin
Jun 23, 2019, 3:09:30 AM6/23/19
to
On Thursday, June 20, 2019 at 10:22:53 PM UTC+3, marij...@gmail.com wrote:
The issue is the imaginary numbers fabrication in mathematics foundation
From recent and earlier discussions here on sci.math launched by me and JG and maybe others as well, it was shown with proofs that were a pile of total rubbish and were too harmful and so insulting to all **innocent** human minds as well
Where all those defenders had failed miserably to meet the "KING" challenge in this regard,
However, this intellectual challenge had been shown not related to any previous or similar cases those jugglers of mathematics tried simply and falsely to relate it since in those well-known cases they had convinced themselves that they were able somehow to escape with it, but never with this following one any more, and FOR SURE
OK, For all those defenders of the legality of imaginary numbers in modern mathematics is a VERY important notice to consider
You don't have to invent many new methods in order to defend it, but you have to go to its origin birth and review carefully and see again how "EXACTLY" it was **mercilessly** planted into your *EMPTY* heads so coolly, where then you may be able to defend it **HOPEFULLY**
And you have to check if it was any real discovery for any real standing problem those days, or was it simply a definition? and if it was so, wasn't that definition just like a decision?
and if so, wasn't that decision a clever or a very foolish decision? Wonder!
where you have to check the motives of those old decision makers also, for sure
Did they make it or claim it for a solution to polynomial equations like the general quadratics or cubic ones? Wonder!
And one more thing you have to ask, where you have to use the ***same logic*** without any restriction or any further juggling and see the contradiction clearly here with both **happy** and **sad** ends but without being any biased or discriminators as always as usual
Otherwise, let them use the same logic to illustrate this following subtle discrepancy in order to justify the fixed ***perpetual*** contradictions in their false reasoning for surer
By the way, here is another and so easy example (out of so many others) to understand strictly the total ***fictionality*** of fabricating such numbers in the core foundation of mathematics
***My challenge***
Consider this ***two***so elementary mathematics **STATEMENTS**
(-1)^5 = (-1)*(-1)*(-1)*(-1)*(-1) = (-1) ----(1)
Now take the square root of both sides of Eqn. (1), you get:
(Sqrt(-1))*(Sqrt(-1))*(Sqrt(-1))*(Sqrt(-1))*(Sqrt(-1)) = (Sqrt(-1)), Hence,
i^5 = i, divide by (i), you get (i^4 = 1)
Oops, this is absolutely so correct and confirms the (definition or the decision) of imaginary unit (i = Sqrt(-1)), so very *happy* end here, and no objection from any professional experts you would certainly encounter
But wait a while, and consider a very similar argument here:
(-1)^3 = (-1)*(-1)*(-1) = (-1) ------(2)
Now take the square root of both sides of Eqn. (2), you get:
(Sqrt(-1))*(Sqrt(-1))*(Sqrt(-1)) = Sqrt(-1), this implies
(i^3 = i), divide by (i), Implies (i^2 = 1)
Oops, this contrary and **contradicting** to the basic definition of
(i^2 = - 1)
And kindly, don't manufacture some an instructional manual on how to use the imaginary numbers such that you mustn't arrive at any contradictions that strictly invalidates them since this is not any *true* mathematics to practice, but definitely very ***bad*** mathematics to make so much silly *business* out of nothing, sure
So, can you do it? defenders (KON, Zelos, Bill, Me, Dan C-T, J4n bur, Python, Sergio, Shio, ..., and the rest of the world), Wonder!
And for all the other agents of **Wikipedia and Journals and Universities or alike** have the full right to shift my challenge to all their alleged **masters** sleeping peacefully in their many **fake Paradises**, SURE
In fact, they must do *take* my challengeS too seriously to their highest levels FOR SURER
Otherwise, I will do it for surest
BKK
Chris M. Thomasson
Jun 23, 2019, 3:20:37 AM6/23/19
to
system, like an L-system does left and right, and all sorts of symbols. Wow.
Chris M. Thomasson
Jun 23, 2019, 3:21:00 AM6/23/19
to
Chris M. Thomasson
Jun 23, 2019, 3:29:50 AM6/23/19
to
left, right. I am not sure why he thinks this is new. Did he ever
program LOGO? Btw, L-systems can be great fun!
bassam king karzeddin
Jun 23, 2019, 5:16:02 AM6/23/19
to
But usually, if something was shown **PUBLICALLY** working perfectly and freely by an amateur who isn't any professional (nor like to be) to write it secretly for *Journals*, then the common tendencies among the professional mathematicians who understand it correctly and like to capitalize it **illegally** for themselves is simply to relate it to some older references that never talked **frankly** the same original idea of that talented amateur, where they try very hard to smell any slight tangent thing that may be far related in order to steal the whole complete idea without bothering even to mention from where they had learnt it **FIRST**
And the (Secretive researchers or Wikipedia writers, Vidio authors and alike) are too expert into those types of clever **thefts** since they usually pick up from many others **freely** their works and simply relate them to themselves, were also their higher authorities encourage them so much in this regard just for the sake of ego problems to learn from any **mateure**and for many other "incurable diseases" with their odd behaviours for merely self protection
So, no wonder that one might see soon many, (Papers, wiki piki articles, Videos, etc) arriving at the same thing that was **PUBLICALLY PUBLISHED FIRST**, and with so many fabricated tonnes of older references as always, as usual, NO WONDER!
Keep it for the record for future developments in this regard about "NEW BINARY SYSTEM WITHOUT ZERO"
and many more like topics of mine as "NON EXISTING ANGLES" or "NON-EXISTING NUMBERS", Polynomials with no roots, Complex numbers fictions, ..., ETC
BKK
bassam king karzeddin
Jun 24, 2019, 4:21:35 AM6/24/19
to
On Saturday, June 22, 2019 at 3:20:41 PM UTC+3, j4n bur53 wrote:
> I heard he was run over by an infinite bus.
I heard that you were run over by your unicorn numbers? didn't you? wonder!
> I heard he was run over by an infinite bus.
But, when shall you dare *openly* to say that the angle (pi/9 = 20 degrees) exists
Of course, you can't and FOR SURE, Can you?
And you can't say that is a unicorn angle, Can you? wonder!
You had been dead long ago with those issues, SURE
You had been proven a *big liar* and very *dishonest* too, besides a BIG *betrayer* to the Pythagorean theorem, FOR SURE
BKK
Chris M. Thomasson
Jun 24, 2019, 5:56:54 PM6/24/19
to
On 6/22/2019 5:20 AM, j4n bur53 wrote:
> I heard he was run over by an infinite bus.
Ouch... Ouch...Ouch... On an on... ;^)
> I heard he was run over by an infinite bus.
Chris M. Thomasson
Jun 24, 2019, 5:57:43 PM6/24/19
to
j4n bur53
Jun 24, 2019, 6:30:47 PM6/24/19
to
j4n bur53
Jun 24, 2019, 6:37:50 PM6/24/19
to
I ended with this Prolog code using DCG:
fibo, ['B'] --> ['A'], !, fibo.
fibo, ['A','B'] --> ['B'], !, fibo.
fibo --> [].
fibos --> [].
fibos --> fibo, fibos.
Here is an example run:
?- fibos(['A'],X).
X = ['A'] ;
X = ['B'] ;
X = ['A', 'B'] ;
X = ['B', 'A', 'B'] ;
X = ['A', 'B', 'B', 'A', 'B'] ;
X = ['B', 'A', 'B', 'A', 'B', 'B', 'A', 'B'] ;
Etc...
fibo, ['B'] --> ['A'], !, fibo.
fibo, ['A','B'] --> ['B'], !, fibo.
fibo --> [].
fibos --> [].
fibos --> fibo, fibos.
Here is an example run:
?- fibos(['A'],X).
X = ['A'] ;
X = ['B'] ;
X = ['A', 'B'] ;
X = ['B', 'A', 'B'] ;
X = ['A', 'B', 'B', 'A', 'B'] ;
X = ['B', 'A', 'B', 'A', 'B', 'B', 'A', 'B'] ;
Etc...
bassam king karzeddin
Jun 25, 2019, 8:05:38 AM6/25/19
to
BKK
Me
Jun 25, 2019, 9:34:24 AM6/25/19
to
On Tuesday, June 25, 2019 at 12:30:47 AM UTC+2, j4n bur53 wrote:
> L-system for fibonacci length words in Prolog
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55786984
The rules:
> L-system for fibonacci length words in Prolog
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55786984
A ~~> B
B ~~> AB
Starting with A this gives the words and length:
Word Length
A 1
B 1
AB 2
BAB 3
ABBAB 5
BABABBAB 8
ABBABBABABBAB 13
...
So the sequence of the length (of the words) is identical with the fibonacci sequence.
Proof:
We consider the sequence (w_n) of words such that each word results from the former by applying the given rules to its letters, starting with A:
w_1 = A, w_2 = B, w_3 = AB, ...
Then for all n >= 3: w_n = w_n-2 + w_n-1 (where "+" means concatenation). Proof by induction: The claim holds for n = 3 (see above). Now let w_n = w_n-2 + w_n-1 for an n >= 3. Then an application of the rules will result in w_n+1 = w_n-1 + w_n.
Since length(X + Y) = length(X) + length(Y) for all words X and Y, lenth(w_n) = lenth(w_n-2) + lenth(w_n-1), for all n >= 3. With lenth(w_1) = lenth(w_2) = 1, we get that the sequence (lenth(w_n)) is identical with the fibonacci sequence. (We might adopt induction here once more.)
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibonacci_number
qed
Chris M. Thomasson
Jun 25, 2019, 10:21:11 PM6/25/19
to
Chris M. Thomasson
Jun 25, 2019, 10:21:58 PM6/25/19
to
Zelos Malum
Jun 26, 2019, 1:20:53 AM6/26/19
to
Chris M. Thomasson
Jun 26, 2019, 3:22:57 AM6/26/19
to
Chris M. Thomasson
Jun 26, 2019, 3:35:04 AM6/26/19
to
A = CHB
B = RIS
Two iterations:
0 = A = CHB
1 = CHB = CHRIS
A goes to CHB... CHB goes to CHRIS?
;^)
Me
Jun 26, 2019, 4:04:57 AM6/26/19
to
On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 at 9:35:04 AM UTC+2, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> just quickly typed this in, it might work:
>
> A ~~> CHB
> just quickly typed this in, it might work:
>
> B ~~> RIS
Starting with A.
> Two iterations:
> (0) A => CHB
> (1) CHB => CHRIS
>
> A goes to CHB... CHB goes to CHRIS?
A => CHB => CHRIS => CHRIS => ...
> A goes to CHB... CHB goes to CHRIS?
Guess so. j4n should know. :-P
bassam king karzeddin
Jun 29, 2019, 12:08:44 PM6/29/19
to
@ Mari
What happened to your teachers in this regard? Wonder!
Are they truly dead to meet my simplest challenges? No wonder!
But, Hey, they may still have a hope to survive with it if they resort to their best *living* masters in this regard
But if their brain masters were too helpless, then all are invited here, openly to certainly and urgently be helped, and freely For sure
Regards
BKK
What happened to your teachers in this regard? Wonder!
Are they truly dead to meet my simplest challenges? No wonder!
But, Hey, they may still have a hope to survive with it if they resort to their best *living* masters in this regard
But if their brain masters were too helpless, then all are invited here, openly to certainly and urgently be helped, and freely For sure
Regards
BKK
j4n bur53
Jun 29, 2019, 1:35:13 PM6/29/19
to
I heard he was run over by a big wheel.
This big wheel had infinitely many angles.
This big wheel had infinitely many angles.
Chris M. Thomasson
Jun 29, 2019, 4:04:13 PM6/29/19
to
Using your notation:
A ~~> DB
B ~~> RISX
D ~~> CH
X ~~> A
A => DB => CHRISX => CHRISA => CHRISDB => CHRISCHRISX => CHRISCHRISA => ...
;^)
j4n bur53
Jun 29, 2019, 4:11:31 PM6/29/19
to
Was more thinking of context sensitive L-system:
XB ~~> BX
XA ~~> AX
XS ~~> SX
MS ~~> SM
X. ~~> Y.
BY ~~> YB
AY ~~> YA
SY ~~> YS
MY ~~> YM
.Y ~~> .X
If you input:
.XBASSAM.
You get a little disco light.
XB ~~> BX
XA ~~> AX
XS ~~> SX
MS ~~> SM
X. ~~> Y.
BY ~~> YB
AY ~~> YA
SY ~~> YS
MY ~~> YM
.Y ~~> .X
If you input:
.XBASSAM.
You get a little disco light.
Me
Jun 30, 2019, 4:39:35 PM6/30/19
to
On Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 7:35:13 PM UTC+2, j4n bur53 wrote:
> I heard he was run over by a big wheel.
> This big wheel had infinitely many angles.
Maybe he's just BRAIN dead?
> I heard he was run over by a big wheel.
> This big wheel had infinitely many angles.
Transfinite Numbers
Sep 22, 2019, 3:37:35 PM9/22/19
to
Unicorns that get overrun by infinite busses
are processed into canned unicorn meat:
EXCELLENT SOURCE OF SPARKLES - Unicorns sprinkle
sparkles everywhere, you are guaranteed that this
unicorn meat is an excellent source of sparkles.
MAGIC IN EVERY BITE - Feel the magic in every
bite of this unicorn meat. There are crunchy
horn bits in every bite. The meat is also
easily spreadable for sandwiches and more.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B004CRYE2C
are processed into canned unicorn meat:
EXCELLENT SOURCE OF SPARKLES - Unicorns sprinkle
sparkles everywhere, you are guaranteed that this
unicorn meat is an excellent source of sparkles.
MAGIC IN EVERY BITE - Feel the magic in every
bite of this unicorn meat. There are crunchy
horn bits in every bite. The meat is also
easily spreadable for sandwiches and more.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B004CRYE2C
Chris M. Thomasson
Sep 22, 2019, 6:27:28 PM9/22/19
to
On 9/22/2019 12:37 PM, Transfinite Numbers wrote:
> Unicorns that get overrun by infinite busses
> are processed into canned unicorn meat:
LOL! :^)
> Unicorns that get overrun by infinite busses
> are processed into canned unicorn meat:
bassam karzeddin
Mar 7, 2020, 10:35:41 AM3/7/20
to
On Thursday, June 20, 2019 at 10:22:53 PM UTC+3, marij...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi there again!
>
> I finished my exams and came back here to read new interesting things. However, I think teacher Bassam King Karzeddin is dead and now a bot is in charge of his account. He talks mainly to himself, with less sense that he used to have, and doesn't seem to read anything at all of what others are writing (half of his posts are blamk!!).
>
> I'm so sorry. Rest In Peace, Mr. Karzeddin.
>
> Mari
Actually this is (OP) and most probably a guy who threatened to kill where I caught him on Academia (on Stak Exchange) but they have hidden ALL my issues for its devasting threat upon their ignorant beliefs
>
> I finished my exams and came back here to read new interesting things. However, I think teacher Bassam King Karzeddin is dead and now a bot is in charge of his account. He talks mainly to himself, with less sense that he used to have, and doesn't seem to read anything at all of what others are writing (half of his posts are blamk!!).
>
> I'm so sorry. Rest In Peace, Mr. Karzeddin.
>
> Mari
But they still don't know that I was only kidding with them a few months ago
BKK
philipe...@gmail.com
Mar 8, 2020, 8:10:49 AM3/8/20
to
Bassam, what are you talking about?
Take a nap, old man, rest a little bit...
Take a nap, old man, rest a little bit...
bassam karzeddin
Oct 1, 2020, 8:15:47 AM10/1/20
to
On Sunday, March 8, 2020 at 3:10:49 PM UTC+3, philipe...@gmail.com wrote:
> Bassam, what are you talking about?
>
> Take a nap, old man, rest a little bit...
And why did you run away young fighter of the truth from the non-ending battle like so many others before you? No wounders!
> Bassam, what are you talking about?
>
> Take a nap, old man, rest a little bit...
Have you ever settled a single issue of pure mine?
And in case you did ever realized your loss, you certainly won the fact which is much more important than all your loss for sure
But do you have the minimum guts to pronounce it **PUBLIC**? wonder!
even though it doesn't make a diffeence ...
Didn't you truly Philipo...?? No wounders!
Bassam King Karzeddin
bassam karzeddin
Oct 8, 2020, 5:11:20 AM10/8/20
to
On Thursday, June 20, 2019 at 10:22:53 PM UTC+3, marij...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi there again!
>
> I finished my exams and came back here to read new interesting things. However, I think teacher Bassam King Karzeddin is dead and now a bot is in charge of his account. He talks mainly to himself, with less sense that he used to have, and doesn't seem to read anything at all of what others are writing (half of his posts are blamk!!).
>
> I'm so sorry. Rest In Peace, Mr. Karzeddin.
>
> Mari
Everybody would soon die, but I'm still alive and would remain forever ...
> Hi there again!
>
> I finished my exams and came back here to read new interesting things. However, I think teacher Bassam King Karzeddin is dead and now a bot is in charge of his account. He talks mainly to himself, with less sense that he used to have, and doesn't seem to read anything at all of what others are writing (half of his posts are blamk!!).
>
> I'm so sorry. Rest In Peace, Mr. Karzeddin.
>
> Mari
BKK
Bassam Karzeddin
Oct 28, 2020, 10:48:03 AM10/28/20
to
On Sunday, March 8, 2020 at 3:10:49 PM UTC+3, philipe...@gmail.com wrote:
> Bassam, what are you talking about?
>
> Take a nap, old man, rest a little bit...
Where are the young **LOOSER** who claimed to construct a number like a cube root two (and by any means if you ever can)?
>
> Take a nap, old man, rest a little bit...
bkk
Bassam Karzeddin
Oct 29, 2020, 6:45:22 AM10/29/20
to
On Thursday, June 20, 2019 at 10:22:53 PM UTC+3, marij...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi there again!
>
> I finished my exams and came back here to read new interesting things. However, I think teacher Bassam King Karzeddin is dead and now a bot is in charge of his account. He talks mainly to himself, with less sense that he used to have, and doesn't seem to read anything at all of what others are writing (half of his posts are blamk!!).
>
> I'm so sorry. Rest In Peace, Mr. Karzeddin.
>
> Mari
That was most likely as an indirect threat of killing since I heard that from an academic person on stalk exchange where they deleted everything
> Hi there again!
>
> I finished my exams and came back here to read new interesting things. However, I think teacher Bassam King Karzeddin is dead and now a bot is in charge of his account. He talks mainly to himself, with less sense that he used to have, and doesn't seem to read anything at all of what others are writing (half of his posts are blamk!!).
>
> I'm so sorry. Rest In Peace, Mr. Karzeddin.
>
> Mari
As if it would change the truth in mathematics that was already launched ...
Only the consequences are very important nowadays ...
BKK
BKK
Bassam Karzeddin
Nov 12, 2020, 8:50:54 AM11/12/20
to
On Thursday, June 20, 2019 at 10:22:53 PM UTC+3, marij...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi there again!
>
> I finished my exams and came back here to read new interesting things. However, I think teacher Bassam King Karzeddin is dead and now a bot is in charge of his account. He talks mainly to himself, with less sense that he used to have, and doesn't seem to read anything at all of what others are writing (half of his posts are blamk!!).
>
> I'm so sorry. Rest In Peace, Mr. Karzeddin.
>
> Mari
Hey, you hiding the academic moron, I'm still alive... and destroying ALL the false mathematics ... FOR SURE
> Hi there again!
>
> I finished my exams and came back here to read new interesting things. However, I think teacher Bassam King Karzeddin is dead and now a bot is in charge of his account. He talks mainly to himself, with less sense that he used to have, and doesn't seem to read anything at all of what others are writing (half of his posts are blamk!!).
>
> I'm so sorry. Rest In Peace, Mr. Karzeddin.
>
> Mari
BKK
BKK
Bassam Karzeddin
Dec 1, 2020, 1:47:48 PM12/1/20
to
On Monday, June 24, 2019 at 11:21:35 AM UTC+3, Bassam Karzeddin wrote:
> On Saturday, June 22, 2019 at 3:20:41 PM UTC+3, j4n bur53 wrote:
> > I heard he was run over by an infinite bus.
> I heard that you were run over by your unicorn numbers? didn't you? wonder!
>
> But, when shall you dare *openly* to say that the angle (pi/9 = 20 degrees) exists
>
> Of course, you can't and FOR SURE, Can you?
>
> And you can't say that is a unicorn angle, Can you? wonder!
>
> You had been dead long ago with those issues, SURE
>
> You had been proven a *big liar* and very *dishonest* too, besides a BIG *betrayer* to the Pythagorean theorem, FOR SURE
>
> BKK
> >
> > Am Donnerstag, 20. Juni 2019 21:22:53 UTC+2 schrieb marij...@gmail.com:
> On Saturday, June 22, 2019 at 3:20:41 PM UTC+3, j4n bur53 wrote:
> > I heard he was run over by an infinite bus.
> I heard that you were run over by your unicorn numbers? didn't you? wonder!
>
> But, when shall you dare *openly* to say that the angle (pi/9 = 20 degrees) exists
>
> Of course, you can't and FOR SURE, Can you?
>
> And you can't say that is a unicorn angle, Can you? wonder!
>
> You had been dead long ago with those issues, SURE
>
> You had been proven a *big liar* and very *dishonest* too, besides a BIG *betrayer* to the Pythagorean theorem, FOR SURE
>
> BKK
> >
> > Am Donnerstag, 20. Juni 2019 21:22:53 UTC+2 schrieb marij...@gmail.com:
bassam karzeddin
Jul 28, 2023, 7:00:47 AM7/28/23
to
What are this kind of fools indeed?
bassam karzeddin
Aug 15, 2023, 11:58:56 PM8/15/23
to
On Thursday, June 20, 2019 at 10:22:53 PM UTC+3, marij...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi there again!
>
> I finished my exams and came back here to read new interesting things. However, I think teacher Bassam King Karzeddin is dead and now a bot is in charge of his account. He talks mainly to himself, with less sense that he used to have, and doesn't seem to read anything at all of what others are writing (half of his posts are blamk!!).
>
> I'm so sorry. Rest In Peace, Mr. Karzeddin.
>
> Mari
Oops 😬, I'm afraid 😨, I'm dead now, so relax from my so annoying posts for ever....📫
> Hi there again!
>
> I finished my exams and came back here to read new interesting things. However, I think teacher Bassam King Karzeddin is dead and now a bot is in charge of his account. He talks mainly to himself, with less sense that he used to have, and doesn't seem to read anything at all of what others are writing (half of his posts are blamk!!).
>
> I'm so sorry. Rest In Peace, Mr. Karzeddin.
>
> Mari
Good by fox & see you soon in the hell! 😔
🔊 Bassam Karzeddin 🔊
bassam karzeddin
Aug 30, 2023, 5:33:24 PM8/30/23
to
bassam karzeddin
Sep 5, 2023, 5:21:07 PM9/5/23
to
On Thursday, June 20, 2019 at 10:22:53 PM UTC+3, marij...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi there again!
>
> I finished my exams and came back here to read new interesting things. However, I think teacher Bassam King Karzeddin is dead and now a bot is in charge of his account. He talks mainly to himself, with less sense that he used to have, and doesn't seem to read anything at all of what others are writing (half of his posts are blamk!!).
>
> I'm so sorry. Rest In Peace, Mr. Karzeddin.
>
> Mari
Oops 😬, I came back to life again!
> Hi there again!
>
> I finished my exams and came back here to read new interesting things. However, I think teacher Bassam King Karzeddin is dead and now a bot is in charge of his account. He talks mainly to himself, with less sense that he used to have, and doesn't seem to read anything at all of what others are writing (half of his posts are blamk!!).
>
> I'm so sorry. Rest In Peace, Mr. Karzeddin.
>
> Mari
BKK
bassam karzeddin
Sep 21, 2023, 10:24:29 AM9/21/23
to
about the huge unbelievable ignorance of all theoretical academics especially in mathematics, FOR SURE
Bkk
bassam karzeddin
Sep 28, 2023, 5:08:46 PM9/28/23
to
On Tuesday, June 25, 2019 at 1:37:50 AM UTC+3, j4n bur53 wrote:
> I ended with this Prolog code using DCG:
>
> fibo, ['B'] --> ['A'], !, fibo.
> fibo, ['A','B'] --> ['B'], !, fibo.
> fibo --> [].
>
> fibos --> [].
> fibos --> fibo, fibos.
>
> Here is an example run:
>
> ?- fibos(['A'],X).
> X = ['A'] ;
> X = ['B'] ;
> X = ['A', 'B'] ;
> X = ['B', 'A', 'B'] ;
> X = ['A', 'B', 'B', 'A', 'B'] ;
> X = ['B', 'A', 'B', 'A', 'B', 'B', 'A', 'B'] ;
> Etc...
Here an irrefutable example about the common trollhood in logic, philosophy & math as well
But how would they know?
Bkk
> I ended with this Prolog code using DCG:
>
> fibo, ['B'] --> ['A'], !, fibo.
> fibo, ['A','B'] --> ['B'], !, fibo.
> fibo --> [].
>
> fibos --> [].
> fibos --> fibo, fibos.
>
> Here is an example run:
>
> ?- fibos(['A'],X).
> X = ['A'] ;
> X = ['B'] ;
> X = ['A', 'B'] ;
> X = ['B', 'A', 'B'] ;
> X = ['A', 'B', 'B', 'A', 'B'] ;
> X = ['B', 'A', 'B', 'A', 'B', 'B', 'A', 'B'] ;
> Etc...
> Am Dienstag, 25. Juni 2019 00:30:47 UTC+2 schrieb j4n bur53:
> > L-system for fibonacci length words in Prolog
> > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55786984
> >
> >
> > L-system for fibonacci length words in Prolog
> > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55786984
> >
> >
But how would they know?
Bkk
bassam karzeddin
Oct 12, 2023, 4:15:37 AM10/12/23
to
On Sunday, June 23, 2019 at 10:09:30 AM UTC+3, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> On Thursday, June 20, 2019 at 10:22:53 PM UTC+3, marij...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Hi there again!
> >
> > I finished my exams and came back here to read new interesting things. However, I think teacher Bassam King Karzeddin is dead and now a bot is in charge of his account. He talks mainly to himself, with less sense that he used to have, and doesn't seem to read anything at all of what others are writing (half of his posts are blamk!!).
> >
> > I'm so sorry. Rest In Peace, Mr. Karzeddin.
> >
> > Mari
> And in case you want to clear the **doubts**, or in case you pretend that you don't know yet what was the challenge, then please do convey my **OLD** and **GOLD** following challenge to the best of your maths teachers you know
> On Thursday, June 20, 2019 at 10:22:53 PM UTC+3, marij...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Hi there again!
> >
> > I finished my exams and came back here to read new interesting things. However, I think teacher Bassam King Karzeddin is dead and now a bot is in charge of his account. He talks mainly to himself, with less sense that he used to have, and doesn't seem to read anything at all of what others are writing (half of his posts are blamk!!).
> >
> > I'm so sorry. Rest In Peace, Mr. Karzeddin.
> >
> > Mari
>
> The issue is the imaginary numbers fabrication in mathematics foundation
>
> From recent and earlier discussions here on sci.math launched by me and JG and maybe others as well, it was shown with proofs that were a pile of total rubbish and were too harmful and so insulting to all **innocent** human minds as well
>
> Where all those defenders had failed miserably to meet the "KING" challenge in this regard,
>
> However, this intellectual challenge had been shown not related to any previous or similar cases those jugglers of mathematics tried simply and falsely to relate it since in those well-known cases they had convinced themselves that they were able somehow to escape with it, but never with this following one any more, and FOR SURE
>
> OK, For all those defenders of the legality of imaginary numbers in modern mathematics is a VERY important notice to consider
>
> You don't have to invent many new methods in order to defend it, but you have to go to its origin birth and review carefully and see again how "EXACTLY" it was **mercilessly** planted into your *EMPTY* heads so coolly, where then you may be able to defend it **HOPEFULLY**
>
> And you have to check if it was any real discovery for any real standing problem those days, or was it simply a definition? and if it was so, wasn't that definition just like a decision?
> and if so, wasn't that decision a clever or a very foolish decision? Wonder!
>
> where you have to check the motives of those old decision makers also, for sure
>
> Did they make it or claim it for a solution to polynomial equations like the general quadratics or cubic ones? Wonder!
>
> And one more thing you have to ask, where you have to use the ***same logic*** without any restriction or any further juggling and see the contradiction clearly here with both **happy** and **sad** ends but without being any biased or discriminators as always as usual
>
> Otherwise, let them use the same logic to illustrate this following subtle discrepancy in order to justify the fixed ***perpetual*** contradictions in their false reasoning for surer
>
> By the way, here is another and so easy example (out of so many others) to understand strictly the total ***fictionality*** of fabricating such numbers in the core foundation of mathematics
>
> ***My challenge***
>
> Consider this ***two***so elementary mathematics **STATEMENTS**
>
> (-1)^5 = (-1)*(-1)*(-1)*(-1)*(-1) = (-1) ----(1)
>
> Now take the square root of both sides of Eqn. (1), you get:
>
> (Sqrt(-1))*(Sqrt(-1))*(Sqrt(-1))*(Sqrt(-1))*(Sqrt(-1)) = (Sqrt(-1)), Hence,
>
> i^5 = i, divide by (i), you get (i^4 = 1)
>
> Oops, this is absolutely so correct and confirms the (definition or the decision) of imaginary unit (i = Sqrt(-1)), so very *happy* end here, and no objection from any professional experts you would certainly encounter
>
> But wait a while, and consider a very similar argument here:
>
> (-1)^3 = (-1)*(-1)*(-1) = (-1) ------(2)
>
> Now take the square root of both sides of Eqn. (2), you get:
>
> (Sqrt(-1))*(Sqrt(-1))*(Sqrt(-1)) = Sqrt(-1), this implies
>
> (i^3 = i), divide by (i), Implies (i^2 = 1)
>
> Oops, this contrary and **contradicting** to the basic definition of
> (i^2 = - 1)
>
> And kindly, don't manufacture some an instructional manual on how to use the imaginary numbers such that you mustn't arrive at any contradictions that strictly invalidates them since this is not any *true* mathematics to practice, but definitely very ***bad*** mathematics to make so much silly *business* out of nothing, sure
>
> So, can you do it? defenders (KON, Zelos, Bill, Me, Dan C-T, J4n bur, Python, Sergio, Shio, ..., and the rest of the world), Wonder!
>
> And for all the other agents of **Wikipedia and Journals and Universities or alike** have the full right to shift my challenge to all their alleged **masters** sleeping peacefully in their many **fake Paradises**, SURE
>
> In fact, they must do *take* my challengeS too seriously to their highest levels FOR SURER
>
> Otherwise, I will do it for surest
>
> BKK
So, the so-called immaginary numbers in mathematics weren't any true proven discovery but purely a mere foolish decision for hidden reasons that nobody told you anything about it
But even though, where they try their best to make it appear as consistent, but it doesn't hold consistent in many cases, where a manual Catalog for the users about how to use it correctly such that no contradictions must occur; must be made & updated constantly ...!
What types of incurable Morons we have in plenty in this utter century? No wonders!
Bkk
0 new messages